NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRANAY SETHI AND ORS.
2017 INSC 106831 October 2017Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined the computation of compensation under Sections 163‑A, 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in death claims, focusing on the appropriate multiplier, the addition of future prospects to the deceased's income, and the quantification of conventional heads such as loss of estate, loss of co…
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusASHALATA BHOWMIK AND ORS.
2018 INSC 77631 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Dilip Bhowmik, was the owner‑cum‑driver of his vehicle and died in an accident caused by his own rash and negligent driving, with no other vehicle involved. His legal representatives filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation, and the Motor Accidents Clai…
ANIL KUMARversusBRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.
2018 INSC 77531 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 25‑year‑old cleaner, was struck by a lorry and suffered fractures of both pelvic bones, urethral rupture, abdominal injuries and a 25% partial permanent disability, losing his job and incurring substantial medical expenses. He claimed compensation under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and t…
YADAVA KUMARversusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANOTHER
2010 INSC 55931 August 2010Case Partly allowed
Yadava Kumar, a 30‑year‑old painter, suffered fractures of both forearms in a road accident and was assessed with 33% disability of the right upper limb, 21% of the left and 20% total disability. The Motor Vehicles Tribunal awarded Rs.52,000 as compensation, which the Karnataka High Court enhanced to Rs.72,000 but refu…
LEELA GUPTA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2010 INSC 56031 August 2010Case Partly allowed
A 39‑year‑old government engineer died in a motor accident, and his wife and three children filed a claim petition under Section 11 OA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,61,800 as compensation, which the High Court enhanced to Rs. 4,70,000 by applying a multiplier of 16 an…
M/S. BALWANT SINGH & SONSversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ANR.
2019 INSC 84431 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a motor vehicle at an auction from a bank that had lifted its hypothecation lien and paid the insurance premium to the insurer, which issued a policy in the name of the original owner but also listed the appellant’s address. The vehicle was stolen shortly after purchase, and the insurer denied t…
RANI & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 65231 July 2018Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a motor accident in 2009 where a lorry collided with a motorcycle, killing the rider Satish and injuring his pillion rider Anand. Separate claims were filed under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation to Satish's legal representatives and to Anand, and the Motor Accident Claims Trib…
REP. BY SEC. AND ORSversusK. BALU & ANR.
2017 INSC 30231 March 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court revisited its earlier directions prohibiting the grant of liquor licences within 500 metres of national and state highways, hearing numerous interlocutory applications for extensions or modifications. It held that the Court’s directions, grounded in public‑health policy and the constitutional right to…
DR. S. RAJASEEKARAN (II)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 115930 November 2017Directions issued
The petition, filed by Dr. S. Rajaseekaran, an orthopaedic surgeon, sought enforcement of road‑safety norms and better treatment of accident victims under Article 32 of the Constitution. The Court had earlier constituted a Committee on Road Safety, which submitted recommendations that the Union and State governments ha…
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusGEETA DEVI AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 95430 October 2023Dismissed
A motor accident in 2010 caused the death of a motorcyclist, leading the victim's dependents to claim compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but held that the insurer, IFFCO Tokio, was not liable because the driver of the insured Tempo vehicle possessed …
SHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI GAUSHALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
2022 INSC 104530 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed
A truck transporting eighteen cattle was intercepted for lacking proper permits, leading to seizure of the animals and registration of FIRs under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and related statutes. The private respondents, claiming ownership, applied under CrPC sections 451 and 457 for interim custody, which …
K. RAMYAversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2022 INSC 104430 September 2022Disposed off
The deceased businessman K. Kumareshan died in a motor accident, leaving a widow, minor children and parents as dependents who claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 4,29,37,700 based on the deceased's income tax returns and audit reports, but the…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSUSHIL KUMAR GODARA
2021 INSC 58030 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, United India Insurance Co., denied the claim of the respondent, Sushil Kumar Godara, for the theft of his Bolero car, arguing that the vehicle was being used without a valid registration, constituting a fundamental breach of the insurance contract. The car had a temporary registration that expired on 19-…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSATINDER KAUR @ SATWINDER KAUR & ORS.
2020 INSC 44730 June 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 after Satpal Singh, a Qatari resident, died in a road accident in India in 1998, leaving his widow Satinder Kaur and three minor children as dependants. The Court held that the deceased's income should be calculated from his 1984 emp…
SRI B.T. KRISHNAPPAversusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER
2010 INSC 25830 April 2010Case Allowed
The appellant, a 50‑year‑old mason, was injured in a road accident and awarded Rs 1,55,000 compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The High Court enhanced the award by only Rs 34,000, noting that the Tribunal’s compensation for loss of amenities and loss of earnin…
SAVELIFE FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2016 INSC 28930 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The SaveLife Foundation filed a public‑interest writ petition seeking a legal framework to protect by‑standers who assist victims of road accidents, arguing that fear of police harassment deters timely help. The Supreme Court examined whether it could, under Articles 32, 141 and 142 of the Constitution, issue binding g…
STATE OF PUNJABversusSAURABH BAKSHI
2015 INSC 27630 March 2015
The respondent, Saurabh Bakshi, was convicted under Section 304A of the IPC for causing the deaths of two persons by rash and negligent driving. The trial magistrate sentenced him to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine; the High Court reduced the sentence to the 24 days already served, relying on the fact that…
URMILA DEVI & ORS.versusBRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.
2020 INSC 10730 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The claimants filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act after the husband/father suffered a road accident, and the Motor Vehicle Accidental Claim Tribunal ordered the National Insurance Company to pay Rs.2,47,500. The insurer appealed to the Patna High Court, challenging its liability to pay, and the claimants filed a…
SUMIT KUMAR SAHAversusRELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
2019 INSC 11430 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a hydraulic excavator in 2007 and insured it for Rs 46,56,600 for the period 22‑07‑2009 to 21‑07‑2010. The excavator was totally destroyed by fire in June 2010. While the insurer’s surveyor calculated depreciation from the original purchase price, the appellant’s surveyor deducted only 10% depre…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
2013 INSC 72929 October 2013Matter referred to larger bench
The respondent filed a claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation after a road accident, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 3.5 lakh. United India Insurance Company appealed, arguing that the claim was not maintainable because the claimant was the driver and no disability…
ARVIND KUMAR MISHRAversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.
2010 INSC 65929 September 2010Case Partly allowed
Arvind Kumar Mishra, a 25‑year‑old final‑year engineering student, suffered multiple injuries and 70% permanent disability in a motor accident caused by the negligent driving of a truck. He claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking loss of future earnings among other damages. The M…
GURU BASAVARAJ @ BEENE SETTAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2012 INSC 35629 August 2012Dismissed
Guru BasavaraJ @ Beene Settappa, the driver of a tractor‑trailer, was convicted under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and 304‑A and Motor Vehicles Act section 187 for a highway accident that caused multiple injuries and one death. The accused claimed the crash resulted from mechanical failure and argued that his young age a…
RUPA ROYversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.
2019 INSC 82429 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rupa Roy, and her 10‑year‑old son were injured when a high‑speed van collided with their rickshaw van, leaving the son with a medically certified 70% permanent disability. She filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a compensation of …
RANJANA PRAKASH AND ORS.versusDIVISIONAL MANAGER AND ANR.
2011 INSC 52729 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a 46‑year‑old bank manager earning Rs.23,134 per month, died in a motor accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.24,12,936 with interest. The insurer appealed, and the High Court reduced the award by 30% on the ground of income‑tax deduction, bringing it down to Rs.16,89,055…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusJAG RAJ SINGH @ HANSA
2016 INSC 44429 June 2016Dismissed
The State of Rajasthan appealed the acquittal of Jag Raj Singh (alias Hansa) for possession of opium recovered from a jeep. The Supreme Court examined whether the police complied with the mandatory provisions of Sections 42(1) and 42(2) of the NDPS Act when they acted on secret information and conducted the search. It …
KAMAL DEV PRASADversusMAHESH FORGE
2025 INSC 59129 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a forging machine operator, lost multiple phalanges of four fingers of his right hand in an accident at work. The Commissioner under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 initially assessed a 100% disability and awarded compensation based on a factor of 213.57. On appeal, the High Court reduced the disab…
MASTER AYUSHversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2022 INSC 36429 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered the claim of a five‑year‑old child who became a paraplegic after a road accident in 2010. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 18,24,000, which the Karnataka High Court reduced to Rs 13,46,805. On appeal, the Court examined the method of calculating compensation under the Motor Veh…
M. C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 28529 March 2017Directions issued
M.C. Mehta filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a ban on the sale and registration of commercial vehicles that do not meet Bharat Stage‑IV (BS‑IV) emission standards from 1 April 2017, arguing that such vehicles pose a serious health hazard. The manufacturers contended that they were entitled to sell the exis…
S. VISHNU GANGA & ORS.versusM/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER & ORS.
2025 INSC 12329 January 2025Disposed off
The appellants' parents, who were partners in a mill, died in a road accident when a bus collided with their vehicle. The appellants filed separate claim petitions under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking Rs 1 crore each, and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 58.24 lakh and Rs 93.61 lakh respectively, ba…
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALAversusMIS K.T.C. AUTOMOBILES
2016 INSC 10629 January 2016Dismissed
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes of Kerala challenged a penalty of Rs.86 lakh imposed on K.T.C. Automobiles for allegedly evading Kerala sales tax by registering 263 cars sold from its Mahe branch under the Pondicherry Sales Tax Act. The High Court set aside the penalty, holding that the sale was completed at Mahe …
SANJAY VERMAversusHARYANA ROADWAYS
2014 INSC 6129 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 25‑year‑old self‑employed man, was paralysed below the waist after a bus accident and filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded Rs 3 lakh, which the High Court enhanced to Rs 8,08,052 by applying a multiplier of 15 and clubbing future treatment with pai…
PAWAN KUMAR & ANR. ETC.versusM/S HARKISHAN DASS MOHAN LAL & ORS
2014 INSC 6229 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The claimants, passengers in a jeep that collided with a fleeing truck, sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 after two of them were killed and one injured. The High Court held both the truck and the jeep responsible but apportioned liability 70% to the truck driver/owner and 30% to the jeep driver/own…
LAXMIDHAR NAYAK AND ORS.versusJU GAL KISH ORE BEHERA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 115028 November 2017Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the sons and daughter of Chanchali Nayak, an agricultural labourer who died in a head‑on collision between a bus and a truck. The tribunal had awarded Rs 70,600 as compensation based on a monthly income of Rs 650 and a multiplier of 12, which the High Court affirmed but reduced…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusCENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT & ORS.
2020 INSC 51628 August 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against two orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) that directed the State to prohibit fuel dealers from supplying petrol to any motor vehicle that did not display a valid Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificate and to deposit Rs 25 crore as security for compliance. The respo…
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusKAMLESH AND OTHERS.
2025 INSC 72428 April 2025Disposed off
The claimants, legal heirs of a government employee who died in a motor accident, were awarded Rs.37,85,800 compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer, New India Assurance Co., appealed seeking deduction of the financial assistance payable under the Haryana Compensation Assistance Rules, 2006, whil…
SHIVAWWA AND ANRversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.
2018 INSC 28528 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Chanabasayya, was killed when he fell from a tractor‑trailer owned by respondent No.2 while returning from unloading maize at Holealur. His father filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation from the insurer (respondent No.1), the vehicle owner (respondent No.2) an…
MONTFORD BROTHERS OF ST. GABRIEL & ANR.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE & ANR. ETC.
2014 INSC 5528 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Catholic society Montford Brothers of St. Gabriel filed a claim before the Mizoram Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, after one of its members, a "Brother" who had renounced his family ties, died in a road accident. The Tribunal allowed the claim, but the insu…
HANUMANAGOUDAversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ETC.
2014 INSC 5728 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
A goods vehicle accident resulted in the death of Hanumanth, who was employed as a 'Gumasthe' accompanying the goods in transit. The claimants (his widow and children) obtained a compensation award from the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claim Tribunal against both the owner‑driver and United India Insurance Company. The Hig…
PARMESHWARIversusAMIR CHAND & ORS.
2011 INSC 7928 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Parmeshwari, a pillion passenger on a motorcycle, suffered a fractured right leg and 32% permanent disability after being hit by a scooter. She filed a complaint with the Superintendent of Police (Hisar) and later a compensation claim, which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,36,547 with 9% interest. The H…
JITHENDRANversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR
2021 INSC 68127 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 21‑year‑old pillion rider, suffered severe head injuries and 69% permanent disability in a 2001 motor accident, leaving him cognitively impaired, immobile and unable to earn. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.5,74,320 compensation, which the High Court increased to Rs.9,38,952 but omitted a…
MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C.versusNEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2015 INSC 80327 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) operated a bus owned by a private individual under a lease agreement. An accident caused by the bus led claimants to seek compensation. The dispute centered on whether liability for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rested on the registered owner, the…
KAMLESH & ORS.versusATTAR SINGH & ORS.
2015 INSC 80527 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The dependants of Rishi Parkash filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the driver, owner and insurer of a Maruti car and the driver of a tempo, seeking compensation for his death in a collision. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held both drivers negligent and awarded Rs.5,81,000 with inter…
ALL KERALA DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, KOTTAYAM UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARYversusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ANR.
2022 INSC 75227 July 2022Dismissed
The petitioners, a Kerala distributors association, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments to the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976 (ss.4(7) and 4(8)), Section 15 of the same Act, and Section 8A of the Kerala Motor Transport Workers’ Welfare Fund Act, 1985, arguing that these provisions made the pa…
ERUDHAYA PRIYAversusSTATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD.
2020 INSC 46627 July 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 23‑year‑old software engineer, was injured in a bus‑accident caused by the negligent driving of a State Express Transport Corporation bus, sustaining a permanent disability of 31.1%. She filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) award…
ALIFIYA HUSENBHAI KESHARIYAversusSIDDIQ ISMAIL SINDHI & ORS.
2024 INSC 45727 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Alifiya Husenbhai Keshariya, was injured in a road accident and claimed Rs 10 lakhs before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded her Rs 2,41,745 with interest. She filed a Miscellaneous Application in the Gujarat High Court seeking permission to appeal the award as an indigent person, arguing…
MOHAR SAI AND ANR.versusGAYATRI DEVI AND ORS.
2018 INSC 42927 April 2018Dismissed
The deceased Krishna Kumar Sahu died in a motorcycle accident; his heirs filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that the motorcycle was driven by the appellant's son, Prem Lal Rajawade, whose rash driving caused the accident, and awa…
NISHAN SINGH & ORS.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH REGIONAL MANAGER & ORS.
2018 INSC 43127 April 2018Case Partly allowed
The appellants filed a claim petition after Balvinder Kaur died in a collision where a Maruti car rear-ended a truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Uttarakhand High Court held that the car driver was at fault for not maintaining a safe distance and dismissed the claim, finding no negligence on the part of …
AVISHEK GOENKAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2012 INSC 18627 April 2012Case Partly allowed
The petitioner, a public‑spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that all motor vehicles in India be fitted only with safety glass having 100% visual light transmission (VLT) and that the use of black films on vehicle windshields and side windows be prohibited. The petition also dem…
PUNJAB ROADWAYS MOGA THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGERversusPUNJA SAHIB BUS AND TRANSPORT CO. AND ORS.
2010 INSC 24427 April 2010Disposed off
The Punjab Roadways, Moga challenged High Court orders that directed the State Transport Authority to grant regular stage‑carriage permits to private operators on routes where State Transport Undertakings (STUs) had either not utilized or had surrendered their permits. The dispute centered on the interpretation of the …
BASAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2014 INSC 14727 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Basappa was charged under IPC sections 279 and 304A and the Motor Vehicles Act for a tractor accident that killed a two‑year‑old child. The trial magistrate acquitted him, finding no cogent evidence that he was the driver at the time of the accident. The State appealed under Cr.P.C. s.378; the High Court …
A.V. PADMA & ORS.versusR. VENUGOPAL & ORS
2012 INSC 5327 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The widowed mother and her two educated daughters of a deceased motor accident victim were awarded compensation, which was later enhanced by the High Court. The insurer deposited the full amount with the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which ordered a portion to be placed in long‑term fixed deposits despite the claiman…
SKODA AUTO VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2020 INSC 66126 November 2020Dismissed
Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Ltd sought to quash an FIR registered under Sections 34, 471, 468, 467, 420, 419 and 406 IPC for alleged installation of defeat devices in its vehicles. The High Court refused to quash the FIR, granting only protection against arrest. The petitioner argued that the police could not i…
AMBALA BUS SYNDICATE PVT. LTD.versusCHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ORS.
2018 INSC 89526 September 2018Leave Granted & Disposed off
Ambala Bus Syndicate, a private operator of non‑air‑conditioned buses, obtained an inter‑state permit from Punjab and sought a counter‑signature from the Chandigarh Union Territory to operate in Chandigarh. The High Court Single Judge allowed the request, but the Division Bench reversed, holding that the 1998 Scheme (a…
STATE OF M.P. & ORS.versusRAKESH SETHI & ANR.
2020 INSC 50626 August 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Madhya Pradesh High Court struck down Rule 55A of the State Motor Vehicles Rules, which imposed fees for reserving specific vehicle registration numbers, holding it ultra vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. The State appealed, arguing that under Sections 65(1) and 211 of t…
KISHAN GOPAL & ANR.versusLALA & ORS.
2013 INSC 56626 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The parents of a ten‑year‑old boy filed a claim petition under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for his death in a tractor‑trolley accident caused by the driver (respondent No.1). The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the claim, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove …
MASTER MALLIKARJUNversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.
2013 INSC 56426 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 12‑year‑old child, was hit by a motorcycle and suffered multiple injuries resulting in a 34% disability of the right lower limb and an 18% disability of the whole body. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.63,500 and the Karnataka High Court enhanced it to Rs.1,09,500, which the child challen…
PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
2013 INSC 56326 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Pepsu Road Transport Corporation (PRTC) owned a bus driven by Nirmal Singh, who was involved in a fatal accident. The claimants obtained compensation from the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, but the insurer, National Insurance Company, was absolved on the ground that the driver’s licence was fake. PRTC appealed, a…
URVIBEN CHIRAGHBAI SHETHversusVIJAYBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI JORANPUTRA .& ORS.
2011 INSC 33526 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed
In 1990 a car driven by the first respondent crashed, leaving the appellant, Urviben, permanently disabled and bedridden. She claimed Rs.15 lakh compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The MACT awarded Rs.6.07 lakh with 9% interest, recording that the a…
MANAM SARASWATHI SAMPOORNA KALAVATHI & ORS.versusMANAGER, APSRTC, TADEPALLIGUDEM A.P. & ANR.
2010 INSC 17626 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased was riding a scooter when an APSRTC bus, driven rashly and without sounding the horn, struck it from behind, causing his death. The deceased's parents and sisters filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that the bus driver’s rash…
N. JAYASREE & ORS.versusCHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
2021 INSC 66625 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a 52‑year‑old Assistant Professor, died in a motor vehicle accident, leaving behind his wife, two daughters and his mother‑in‑law who lived with the family and was financially dependent on him. The appellants filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, but the Kerala High Cou…
SHARDA ASSOCIATESversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
2022 INSC 74525 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Sharda Associates insured a JCB excavator with United India Insurance for Rs 13.50 lakhs. While the excavator was being used for road construction, a section of the road collapsed, causing the machine to fall into a ditch, killing two workers and resulting in total loss of the excavator. The insurer denied the claim, i…
UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusKULSUM & ORS.
2011 INSC 51525 July 2011Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) hired a privately owned mini‑bus, which was insured by National Insurance Company, and the bus was involved in a fatal accident. The claimants sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the corporation l…
V. MEKALAversusM. MALATHI & ANR.
2014 INSC 34425 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 16‑year‑old student who secured first rank in her class, suffered 70% permanent disablement after a motor vehicle accident. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded Rs 6,46,000 and the Madras High Court enhanced it to Rs 18,22,000, taking a notional monthly income of Rs 6,000. The Supreme Court held t…
ANJANI SINGH & ORS.versusSALAUDDIN & ORS.
2014 INSC 32825 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The husband of the claimants, Sergeant Dalbir Singh, died in a road accident caused by the negligent driving of the respondent. The claimants filed a compensation claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 2,49,600 with a dependency multiplier of 8, which the…
SRIKRISHNA KANTA SINGHversusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 39425 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
A Block Development Officer was riding pillion on a scooter when it collided with the tail‑end of a long trailer, resulting in the amputation of both his legs. The claimant sought compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, but the Tribunal and the Calcutta High Court held that the scooter driver, w…
SMT. SAVITAversusMOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988
2014 INSC 20425 March 2014Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Smt. Savita, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of her husband, Sandeep Chauhan, in a road accident. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 4,28,000 based on a notional annual income of Rs. 36,000, a multiplier of 17, and deductions fo…
SRI. BENSON GEORGEversusRELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.& ANR.
2022 INSC 23525 February 2022Case Partly allowed
The claimant, a 29‑year‑old bank employee, suffered grievous brain injuries in a motor accident on 01‑01‑2013 and has remained in a permanent coma and bedridden. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 94.37 lakh with 9% interest; the High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 1.24 crore but reduced the interest …
UNITED LNDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ANR.
2017 INSC 114324 November 2017Hearing Adjourned
The appeal concerned a claim for compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by Sunil Kumar against United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurer attempted to defend the claim by alleging negligence of the driver/owner of the vehicle. The Supreme Court examined whether such a defence is permiss…
DR. BALRAM PRASADversusDR. KUNAL SAHA & ORS.
2013 INSC 71724 October 2013Disposed off
Dr. Kunal Saha filed a consumer complaint after his wife died while being treated for toxic epidermal necrolysis at AMRI Hospital. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the hospital and four doctors negligent but reduced the claim, deducted 10% for alleged contributory negligence and awarded only Rs.…
S. PERUMALversusK. AMBIKA & ANR.
2015 INSC 15124 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a poultry labourer, was injured in a motor vehicle collision on 18 November 2009, sustaining multiple rib fractures and a 25% permanent disability. He claimed Rs 5,00,000 compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, but the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs 25,300 with 7.5% interest, a d…
BELI RAMversusRAJINDER KUMAR & ANR.
2020 INSC 56023 September 2020Dismissed
The plaintiff Beli Ram, owner of a truck, employed a driver who had been driving with an expired licence for nearly three years. The driver suffered a road accident resulting in 20% permanent disability and claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The High Court held the insurer not liable and p…
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHASHI SHARMA & ORS.
2016 INSC 90923 September 2016Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether amounts paid to the dependents of a deceased government employee under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules, 2006 should be deducted from compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for a fatal motor accident. The Court reiterated that compensation must be "just and …
SMT. DARIYAO KANWAR & ORS.versusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2023 INSC 75623 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Sumer Singh, was employed as a driver by the owner of a truck and was on duty driving from Delhi to Baroda when he felt unwell, parked the vehicle and died. The claimants, his dependents, filed an application under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 and were awarded compensation by the Workmen's Compen…
REBEKA MINZ AND ORS.versusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.
2012 INSC 35023 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The husband of the appellants died in a road accident, and the wife and children claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Tribunal awarded Rs 10,08,000 using a multiplier of 12 and interest at 7% for certain periods. The High Court reduced the compensation to Rs 5,00,000 and the inte…
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusKUSUMA AND ANR.
2011 INSC 60023 August 2011Dismissed
In 1995 a pregnant woman (Kusuma) was injured in a road accident and subsequently delivered a still‑born baby. She filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for loss of the unborn child and pain and suffering. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 50,000 for the loss of the unborn…
MEENAKSHIversusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
2024 INSC 57323 July 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Meenakshi, mother of Suryakanth who died in a road accident, claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1.04 crore based on the deceased’s gross monthly salary of Rs 50,942, which included house rent allowance, a flexible benefit plan and employer’s c…
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusKALU RAM AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 65323 June 2026
The deceased, a 20‑year‑old CA final student, was killed when his roommate's car struck a truck that had been left stationary on a dark road without any warning lights or signs. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that the negligence lay with the truck driver for leaving the vehicle unattended, and awarded Rs 81,21…
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMANNAT JOHAL & ORS. ETC. ETC.
2019 INSC 56123 April 2019Dismissed
An oil tanker collided with a car driven by Rajpal Singh Johal, killing him and injuring his family. The claimants (his parents, wife, and children) sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, while the insurer challenged the quantum of award and the interest rate. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal initial…
MANASVI JAINversusDELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS
2014 INSC 31123 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The father of the appellant, an Executive Engineer earning a gross salary of Rs.26,950 per month, died in a motor accident. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal computed his net monthly income by deducting contributions to the General Provident Fund, house rent, GIS and income tax, arriving at Rs.15,784 and awarded Rs.1…
SANTOSH DEVIversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 18123 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Santosh Devi, claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of her husband, a self‑employed dairy farmer, in a road accident caused by the negligent driving of another vehicle. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,32,000 with a 12% interest, applying a mu…
K.S. MURALIDHARversusR. SUBBULAKSHMI & ANR.
2024 INSC 88622 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, K.S. Muralidhar, suffered a severe spinal injury resulting in 100% functional disability after his company vehicle collided with a negligently driven lorry. The Tribunal awarded Rs.58,09,930 plus interest and future medical expenses, while the Karnataka High Court enhanced the award to Rs.78,16,390, calc…
KAVINversusP. SREEMANI DEVI & ORS.
2025 INSC 102822 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Kavin, aged 21, suffered 100% permanent disability in a bus accident and claimed Rs.1 crore compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.67,83,866, but the Madras High Court reduced it by Rs.19 lakh, cutting amounts for future medical expens…
ARUN KUMAR AGRAWAL AND ANOTHERversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND OTHERS
2010 INSC 41622 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, the husband and son of a 39‑year‑old housewife who died in a road accident, claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal initially awarded Rs 6 lakhs based on the notional income provision of Clause 6 of the Second Schedule but reduced it to…
NIDHI BHARGAVA & ORS. A1: NIDHI BHARGAVA A2: MANUJ BHARGAVA A3: ANUJ BHARGAVAversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. R1: NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER R2: K. L. BHARGAVA R3: ANIL KUMAR KUKREJA
2025 INSC 52622 April 2025Disposed off
The appellants, heirs of a businessman who died when a bus collided with his motorcycle in August 2008, claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 31,41,000 with 9% interest, but the Delhi High Court reduced the amount to Rs 16,97,370, excluding the deceased's…
IN RE: COMPENSATION AMOUNTS DEPOSITED WITH MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNALS AND LABOUR COURTSversusNA
2025 INSC 53022 April 2025
The Supreme Court, acting suo motu, examined the problem of large sums of unclaimed compensation lying with Motor Accident Claims Tribunals (MACTs) and Labour Courts under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, after an email from a retired district judge highlighted the issue. The Court…
S. RAJASEEKARANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 115922 April 2014Hearing Adjourned
The petitioner, an orthopaedic surgeon, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the Supreme Court’s intervention to enforce the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and related regulations to curb the high incidence of road accidents in India and to improve post‑accident care. The Court examined the extensive data on accide…
KALPANARAJversusTAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION
2014 INSC 30222 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Kalpanaraj, the legal representative of a deceased 46‑year‑old motorcyclist, filed a claim for compensation under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on behalf of his wife and two minor children. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs.20.90 lacs based on a monthly income of Rs.15,000 and a multiplier of 18…
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS
2022 INSC 22122 February 2022Dismissed
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. (the appellant) had extended a loan for the purchase of a transport vehicle. When the borrower defaulted, the financier repossessed the vehicle and contested liability to pay motor vehicle tax under the Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997. The High Court held that…
STATE OF KERALAversusE.T.ROSE LYND & ORS.
2012 INSC 9822 February 2012Case Partly allowed
An accident on a national highway caused the death of a pillion rider when his motorcycle collided with a stationary lorry. The claimants obtained a compensation award from the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, holding the truck owner, driver, insurer and the motorcycle rider liable. The truck owner and rider appealed t…
SHIV KUMAR & ORSversusGAINDA LAL & ORS.
2022 INSC 113021 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the original claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of a 25‑year‑old housewife who was also engaged in tuition work and was pregnant at the time of a vehicular accident. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal had awarded Rs …
ANANT SON OF SIDHESHWAR DUKREversusPRATAP SON OF ZHAMNNAPPA LAMZANE & ANOTHER
2018 INSC 73821 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 29‑year‑old driver earning Rs 8,500 per month, was injured in a motor‑vehicle collision that left him with 75% permanent disability, causing loss of livelihood. He claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a lump‑sum of Rs 7,00,000, which the Hi…
MANUARA KHATUN & ORS.versusRAJESH KR. SINGH & ORS.
2017 INSC 16421 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed
In 2001 a Tata Sumo collided head‑on with a truck, killing two passengers and injuring others who were travelling as gratuitous passengers. The claimants obtained compensation from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, but the Tribunal held that the insurer of the Tata Sumo was not liable because the victims were gratuit…
M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE
2024 INSC 88020 November 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether mobile service providers (MSPs) could claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid for mobile towers and prefabricated buildings (PFBs) used in their networks. The dispute arose from conflicting decisions of the Bombay High Court, which held the towers and PFBs to be immovable property a…
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusBALAKRISHNAN & ANOTHER
2012 INSC 52120 November 2012Case Partly allowed
The Managing Director of a company was injured while travelling in a car owned by the company and insured with National Insurance Company Ltd. He claimed compensation under Sections 140, 147 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal held the insurer liable. The insurer appealed, arg…
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSURENDRA NATH LOOMBA AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 52020 November 2012Disposed off
The claimant, Surendra Nath Loomba, lost both eyes when a car insured by Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. collided with a tree; he claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.20,97,984, which the High Court reduced to Rs.16,42,656, holding the ins…
SUDARSAN PUHANversusJAYANTA KU. MOHANTY & ANR. ETC.
2018 INSC 85020 September 2018Case Partly allowed
The claimant, Sudarsan Puhan, suffered paraplegia after a motorcycle accident and obtained a compensation award of Rs.24,62,065 from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Both the claimant and the insurer appealed to the Orissa High Court; the insurer's appeal was partially allowed, red…
NUTAN RANI AND ANR.versusGURMAIL SINGH AND ORS.
2018 INSC 62120 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Ashok Kumar, a 30‑year‑old salesman earning Rs 3,000 per month, died in a bus accident. His heirs filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs 50,000, while the High Court increased the award to Rs 3,98,500 but neither added a benefit for future pro…
RAJ TRANSPORT CO. PVT. LTD., AMRITSARversusSTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PB. & ORS.
2010 INSC 79419 November 2010Dismissed
The State Transport Commissioner invited applications for four stage‑carriage permits on the Samana‑Amritsar route. Two permits were granted to the Pepsu Road Transport Corporation (PRTC) and the remaining two were withheld. The appellants filed appeals, which were pending when the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was repealed…
K. SURESHversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR
2012 INSC 49019 October 2012Case Partly allowed
K. Suresh was injured in a motor vehicle accident and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.25,00,000 in various heads including permanent disability and loss of earning capacity. The Madras High Court reduced the award to Rs.9,78,000, deleting the permanent disability component and lowering other heads, reason…
SUSHMAversusNITIN GANAPATI RANGOLE & ORS.
2024 INSC 70619 September 2024Disposed off
In 2013 a car collided with a 14‑wheeler that had been abandoned in the middle of a highway without any warning lights or markers, killing the car's driver and three passengers while one passenger, Smt. Sushma, survived with injuries. The claimants filed compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act against the owne…
VISHAL ASHOK THORAT AND ORS.versusRAJESH SHRIRAMBAPU FATE & ORS.
2019 INSC 78119 July 2019Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined a challenge to the recruitment of Assistant Inspectors of Motor Vehicles (Group‑C) in Maharashtra, where a petitioner who had never applied for the post sought to quash the 2016 recruitment Rules, the advertisements of 2017 and the select list of 832 candidates. The High Court had allowed the…
MANIYAR ILIYAZ @ SHAIK RIYAZ & ANR.versusP. AYYAPPAN & ORS.
2026 INSC 64719 June 2026Disposed off
The appellant, a father, lost his five‑year‑old son when a tanker struck the boy as they walked to school on a road that had no footpath or pedestrian crossing. The father filed a claim for Rs 25,00,000 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded Rs 7,82,000 with interest; the High Court later reduced the …
GENERAL INSURANCE COUNCIL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
2010 INSC 22519 April 2010Disposed off
The General Insurance Council and several insurers filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution alleging that police and other agencies were not complying with Supreme Court directions concerning the disposal of vehicles seized in criminal investigations. They contended that non‑compliance of Sections 451…
SUNITA & ORS.versusVINOD SINGH & ORS.
2025 INSC 36619 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, the family of Smt. Tarawati who was killed by a negligent truck driver, challenged the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and enhanced by the High Court under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. They contended that the deceased's age was incorrectly taken as 60 years, that her monthly …
N. SURESHversusYUSUF SHARIFF & ANR.
2012 INSC 13819 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, N. Suresh, was severely injured in a motor accident caused by the rash driving of a lorry, resulting in 90% permanent disability of his right leg and 50-60% facial disability. He claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, asserting a monthly income of over Rs.8,000 prior to t…
RAMRAO LALA BORSE AND ANRversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR
2018 INSC 4319 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The parents of Deepak, a 29‑year‑old assistant teacher who died in a bus‑truck collision, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs 61.20 million using a multiplier of 17 based on the deceased’s age, plus conventional heads. The Bombay…
PAPPU AND ORS.versusVINOD KUMAR LAMBA AND ANR.
2018 INSC 3619 January 2018Disposed off
The widowed wife of Om Prakash, who died in a road accident on 12‑08‑1995 when his truck was struck by Truck No. DIL‑5955, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The offending truck was comprehensively insured by National Insurance Co. Ltd. (respondent No.2). The Motor Accident Claims Tribun…
ANIL & ORSversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS
2018 INSC 4019 January 2018Dismissed
The case involved a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act after a tractor allegedly ran over Ram Kanwar, resulting in his death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs. 21,38,000 to the claimants, finding the tractor driver negligent, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court reversed the award, ho…
GEETA DUBEY & ORS.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 65218 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The claimants, wife and son of the deceased Chakradhar Dubey, filed a motor accident claim after he was injured and later died following a collision between his car and a truck (MP-19-HA-1197). The First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded compensation of Rs. 50,41,289 against the truck driver and …
B.A. LINGA REDDY ETC. ETC.versusKARNATAKASTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY & ORS.
2014 INSC 89018 December 2014Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Karnataka State Government, while modifying road‑transport schemes under section 102 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, must record reasons for its decision. The Court held that modification of a scheme is a quasi‑judicial function and, therefore, the State must give a reasoned orde…
T. J. PARAMESHWARAPPA@PARAMESHWARAPPA@J. T. PARAMESHWARAPPA@TALALKENA GOWDRA PARAMESHWARAPPAversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2022 INSC 118018 November 2022Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a cleaner, suffered comminuted fractures of both tibiae in a road accident on 15 May 2015 and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 21,08,400, but the Karnataka High Court reduced the permanent disability assessment to 20% and the award to Rs 7,3…
SMT. MEENA PAWAIA & ORS.versusASHRAF ALI & ORS.
2021 INSC 75018 November 2021Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the parents of a 21‑22‑year‑old civil engineering student who died in a motor vehicle accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had fixed the deceased’s future loss of income at Rs.15,000 per month and applied a multiplier of 14 based on the parents’ age, awarding Rs.12,85,000…
RAJ BALA & ORS.versusRAKEJA BEGAM & ORS.
2022 INSC 110718 October 2022Case Partly allowed
The wife and children of a deceased Head Constable filed a claim under Sections 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking Rs 50 lakh after a bus in which he was a passenger fell into the Chenab River. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 17,73,704 and the Punjab & Haryana High Court enhanced it to R…
DIVYAversusTHE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR
2022 INSC 110818 October 2022Disposed off
The appellant, a two‑year‑old girl, suffered near‑total loss of lower‑limb function in a 1998 motor‑vehicle accident and was later certified by a Medical Board as having almost 100% permanent disability. The Motor Vehicles Tribunal dismissed her claim on technical grounds, but the Madras High Court set aside that dismi…
RAJ KUMARversusAJAY KUMAR & ANR.
2010 INSC 70318 October 2010Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a 25‑year‑old roadside cheese vendor, suffered fractures in a motor accident and claimed compensation for loss of future earnings. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a modest sum, basing the claimant's monthly income on the minimum wage and deducting one‑third for personal expenses, while treatin…
MAGMA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusNANU RAM ALIAS CHUHRU RAM & ORS.
2018 INSC 82818 September 2018Leave Granted & Disposed off
The deceased, a 24‑year‑old self‑employed motorcyclist, was killed when his bike was struck by a car driven by respondent No.3. The father and sister of the deceased filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation, which was initially awarded by the MACT at Rs.3,39,208. The Punjab & Har…
MITHUSINH PANNASINH CHAUHANversusGUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR.
2015 INSC 67918 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 35‑year‑old constable, suffered severe head injury, loss of speech, memory and mobility after being hit by a Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation bus. He filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking Rs 4 lakh compensation for medical expenses, loss of earnings, permanent…
INDRA DEVI & ORS.versusBAGADA RAM & ANR.
2010 INSC 52318 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation after a motorcycle accident that killed Ramniwas, and also claimed "no fault" compensation under Section 140, which was paid by the insurer. The Tribunal held that the deceased was at fault, rejected the Section 166 claim, a…
ESHWARAPPA @ MAHESHWARAPPA & ANR.versusC.S. GURUSHANTHAPPA & ANR.
2010 INSC 52418 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
A privately owned car met with a fatal accident killing the driver and four occupants, while a fifth passenger was injured. The heirs of the deceased filed claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, both of which were rejected, including a denial of "no‑fault" compensation unde…
SURENDRA KUMAR BHILAWEversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
2020 INSC 43418 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Surendra Kumar Bhilawe, owned an Ashok Leyland truck that was insured by New India Assurance. The truck was involved in a serious accident in November 2011, and the appellant filed a claim for the loss. The insurer denied the claim, alleging that the vehicle had been sold in 2008 to Mohammad Iliyas Ansar…
SURESHCHANDRA BAGMAL DOSHI & ANR.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.
2018 INSC 36218 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The parents of a 25‑year‑old widowed engineer who died in a motor accident claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Tribunal awarded Rs.15,71,000, applying a 100% increase for future income rise, a one‑third deduction for personal expenses, and a multiplier of 16. The Gujarat High Court altered the award …
R. HALLEversusRELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
2026 INSC 26018 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant R. Halle, a 30‑year‑old manager, suffered grievous injuries including head injury, facial injuries and a left femur fracture in a head‑on collision with a motorcycle driven by R. Chinnadurhi. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) certified a permanent physical disability of 63% and awarded Rs 65,53,8…
JAKIR HUSSEINversusSABIR & ORS.
2015 INSC 13518 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Jakir Hussein, a professional driver, suffered grievous injuries to his right arm in a collision caused by the negligent driving of Sabir, rendering him permanently disabled and unable to earn a livelihood as a driver. The claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 sought compensati…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusK.M. POONAM & ORS.
2011 INSC 13518 February 2011Disposed off
The owner of a jeep obtained a motor insurance policy covering six occupants, including the driver. The vehicle, however, was carrying fifteen passengers when it met with an accident, resulting in multiple deaths and injuries. Claimants filed compensation claims, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the insurer …
SRI K.R. MADHUSUDHAN & ORS.versusTHE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER & ANR.
2011 INSC 13718 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a 53‑year‑old senior assistant of Karnataka Electricity Board, died in a road accident caused by a van owned by the first respondent. The claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) with a multiplier of 11, awarding Rs.14,27,496…
RAVIversusBADRINARAYAN AND ORS.
2011 INSC 13918 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ravi, a minor, was severely injured when a truck reversed and struck him, resulting in permanent 50% disability. His father lodged the FIR three months after the accident, citing the child's critical condition and lack of legal awareness as reasons for the delay. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and th…
ISHWARJI NAGAJI MALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER
2022 INSC 5718 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The case involves an alleged murder of Daxaben, where the husband (respondent No.2) was accused of conspiring with co‑accused to kill her for insurance money and stage it as an accident. The investigation produced extensive material, including call records and a charge‑sheet linking the accused to the crime under Secti…
SARUP SINGH @ RAM SARUPversusHDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.
2022 INSC 109817 October 2022Case Partly allowed
The deceased, a 28‑year‑old, died in a motor accident and his wife, minor daughter, father and sister claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 20.64 lakh based on a notional monthly income of Rs 10,000, a 30% uplift for future prospects and a one‑quarter ded…
MANUSHA SREEKUMAR & ORS.versusTHE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
2022 INSC 110217 October 2022Case Partly allowed
The deceased, a 32‑year‑old fish‑vendor‑cum‑driver, died in a 2015 road accident caused by a rash driver of a car insured by United India Insurance Co. The claimants (wife, minor son and mother) sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, including loss of dependency. The Tribunal awarded Rs 32,39,000, whic…
PAPPU DEO YADAVversusNARESH KUMAR AND ORS.
2020 INSC 55317 September 2020Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a 20‑year‑old data‑entry operator, lost his right hand in a motor‑vehicle accident and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal assessed his disability at 89% but reduced it to 45% and used a monthly income of Rs 8,000, omitting a 50% addition for future…
R. VENKATA RAMANA & ANR.versusTHE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2013 INSC 63117 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed
A 17‑year‑old student suffered an 80% permanent disability in a motor accident and became bedridden, requiring lifelong care. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded the parents compensation of Rs.18,75,800 with 7.5% interest. The Andhra Pradesh High Court reduced the award to Rs.12,45,800, relying on the precedent …
AMRIT PAUL SINGH & ANR.versusTATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 53117 May 2018Dismissed
The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for compensation after a truck, allegedly without a valid permit, struck a motorcycle on 19‑02‑2013, causing the rider's death. The insurer contended that the vehicle was unpermitted and the driver unlicensed, invoking Section 149(2) to deny lia…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusLAXMAMMA & ORS.
2012 INSC 17517 April 2012Dismissed
The owner of a bus paid the premium for a motor vehicle insurance policy by cheque, which later bounced. The bus was involved in an accident causing the death of a passenger, and the claimants sought compensation from the insurer, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurer argued that the policy was void due to non-pa…
PARMINDER SINGHversusHONEY GOYAL AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 36117 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 21‑year‑old veterinary student and state‑level volleyball player, suffered quadriplegia and 100% disability after being hit by a car, and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 5,16,000, which the High Court enhanced to Rs 15,25,600 by ass…
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY & ANR.versusSHAJU ETC
2022 INSC 19617 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Regional Transport Authority sought to replace a stage‑carriage vehicle under a permit, but the applicant's request to use an older vehicle was rejected under Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The High Court held the rule ultra‑vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a view the Supreme Court rejec…
PRAVEENBHAI S. KHAMBHAYATAversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2015 INSC 12817 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, owner of two vehicles, claimed that United India Insurance Company should indemnify him for the death of his employee, Ramesh Lalmani Yadav, who was a cleaner and died while filling water in the radiator of a second vehicle on the employer's direction. The Labour Court held the owner jointly liable with …
P. S. SOMANATHAN AND ORS.versusDISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER AND ANR.
2011 INSC 13117 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed
A 33‑year‑old unmarried man was killed by a lorry on a highway. His mother, brother and later the mother’s daughter filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded Rs.1,71,600 using a multiplier of 16 based on the deceased’s age and…
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDHANBAI KANJI GADHVI & ORS.
2011 INSC 5317 January 2011Disposed off
The heirs of a deceased motor accident victim filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for fault-based compensation and later filed a separate claim under Section 163A for no‑fault compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation under Section 163A and subsequently permitted the cl…
SAFIQ AHMADversusICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS
2021 INSC 91016 December 2021Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the widespread filing of fraudulent compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Workmen's Compensation Act, as investigated by a Special Investigating Team (SIT) in Uttar Pradesh. The SIT reported 1,376 suspicious claims, of which 247 had been examined, leading to 92 criminal cas…
SIDRAMversusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.
2022 INSC 120416 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 19‑year‑old utensil seller, suffered paraplegia and a 45% permanent disability in a road accident on 18 July 2012. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 6,13,000 in compensation, which the Karnataka High Court enhanced to Rs 9,26,800 by increasing the notional monthly income to Rs 7,000 and th…
KURVAN ANSARI ALIAS KURVAN ALI & ANR.versusSHYAM KISHORE MURMU & ANR.
2021 INSC 73416 November 2021Case Partly allowed
The appellants, parents of a seven‑year‑old child who died after being struck by a motorcycle, filed a claim under Section 163‑A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs.15,000 per annum (as per Schedule‑II) and awarded Rs.2,25…
VIMLA DEVI & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.
2018 INSC 107616 November 2018Leave Granted & Allowed
The claimants, the wife and two minor children of a deceased bus passenger, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the insurer, driver and owner of the offending truck, seeking compensation for death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the petition on the ground that …
RAMESHversusKARAN SINGH & ANR
2022 INSC 97416 September 2022Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a merchant navy seaman earning USD 1,000, suffered a severe vehicular accident on 2 January 1997 resulting in amputation of his right upper limb below the elbow and required five surgeries. He claimed Rs 1.02 crore compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, s.166 for permanent disability, but the M…
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusKAHLON @ JASMAIL SINGH KAHLON (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE NARINDER KAHLON GOSAKAN AND ANOTHER
2021 INSC 40316 August 2021Case Partly allowed
The claimant suffered severe injuries in a motor accident in 1999 and filed a claim under Section 166(1)(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs.1,00,000, which the claimant appealed; he died in 2015 of causes unrelated to the accident, and his daughter was substituted as…
SMT. SUNITA TOKAS & ANR.versusNEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2019 INSC 91216 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The parents of 21‑year‑old Pradeep Tokas filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act after he died as a pillion rider in a collision with a stationary truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of Rs 16,246, a multiplier of 15 derived from the …
RAVI KAPURversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2012 INSC 33316 August 2012Dismissed
The appellant Ravi Kapur was charged under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A for a bus accident that caused multiple deaths and injuries. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution failed to prove his identity as the driver and that procedural lapses, such as the absence of a test identification para…
RAVIRAJ UDUPAversusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2011 INSC 58016 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 32‑year‑old private contractor, claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a road accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.4,06,400 with 8% interest, considering the nature of injuries and loss of future earnings. The insurer appeale…
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusBABY P. P. & ORS.
2018 INSC 52516 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), a State Transport Undertaking (STU), sought to enforce a scheme notified under Sections 99 and 100 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 that gave it exclusive rights on the Angamaly‑Perumbavoor route, a notified route. Private operator Baby P.P. applied to the Regional Tr…
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusJAGBIR SINGH
2015 INSC 33116 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Jagbir Singh purchased a tractor with a loan from Central Bank of India. The tractor was initially insured but the insurance was not renewed after May 2005. On 24 September 2007 the uninsured tractor was involved in a fatal accident, and a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation against the driver and owner…
SHIVALEELA AND OTHERS A1: SHIVALEELA A2: KUMARI KAVYA A3: KUMARI PURNIMA A4: KUMARI SHRAVYA A5: MASTER VEERESH A6: K. H. M. SHIVAMURTHAIAHversusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS R1: THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. R2: SRI. GIRISH B. R3: DR. BASAVARAJA
2025 INSC 35716 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The deceased, K.H.M. Shivamurthaiah, died in a motor vehicle accident, leaving behind a family dependent on his earnings from agriculture, milk‑vending and tractor‑hiring. The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT) awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of Rs.10,000, which the High Court reduced to Rs.8…
HARPREET KAUR & ORSversusMOHINDER YADAV & ORS.
2022 INSC 128315 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a 35‑year‑old farmer who cultivated 66 acres and owned 12 acres, died in a motor vehicle accident caused by the negligent driving of a truck. The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded Rs 6,60,000, which the High Court lat…
GOHAR MOHAMMEDversusUTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHERS
2022 INSC 128215 December 2022Dismissed
The deceased, Gohar Mohammed, was killed when his car was rear‑ended by a bus owned by Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded Rs.31.90 lakh compensation, holding the owner liable because the vehicle was operated without a valid permit and in breach of insurance…
SRI DINESH KUMAR J. @ DINESH J.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS .
2017 INSC 124715 December 2017Case Allowed
The appellant, a 26‑year‑old motorcyclist, was injured in a collision with a mini‑lorry owned by the second and third respondents and insured by the first respondent. He claimed Rs 40 lakhs compensation, but the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal assessed his permanent disability at 10% and awarded Rs 9 lakhs, later reduce…
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY HOME, PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPT & ORS.versusK. BALU & ANR.
2017 INSC 30215 December 2016Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the presence of retail liquor shops on national and state highways after the Union Government, through expert bodies and advisories, highlighted the danger of drunken driving on these roads. The petitioners (State of Tamil Nadu and other states) sought a blanket prohibition on granting licenc…
GIAN CHAND & ORS.versusGURLABH SINGH & ORS.
2015 INSC 92415 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The claimants, parents of a deceased school teacher, filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation after a bus accident that killed their son. The bus driver and the transport undertaking argued that the accident resulted from a sudden mechanical failure of the belt of springs,…
CHANDRAMANI NANDAversusSARAT CHANDRA SWAIN AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 77715 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Chandramani Nanda, suffered severe head injuries in a motor vehicle accident on 16 January 2014, resulting in 100% functional disability and loss of earning capacity. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him ₹20,60,385, which the High Court enhanced to ₹30,99,873 by treating his disability as 100% …
SUSHILA AGGARWAL & ORS.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2020 INSC 10615 May 2018Dismissed
The appellant, Amrit Paul Singh, challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held Tata AIG General Insurance liable to pay compensation for a fatal road accident involving a truck that lacked a valid transport permit. The High Court affirmed the tribunal's decision, and the Supreme Court examined whether the…
MUNNALAL JAIN AND ANOTHERversusVIPIN KUMAR SHARMAANO OTHERS
2015 INSC 42015 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The parents of Satendra Kumar Jain, a 30‑year‑old self‑employed bachelor who died in a motor accident, claimed loss of dependency under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 6,24,000, which the Delhi High Court enhanced to Rs 12,61,800 by fixing a monthly income of …
SUSHILABEN INDRAVADAN GANDHI & ANR.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.
2020 INSC 33615 April 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sushilaben Gandhi, claimed compensation under a Motor Vehicles Act claim for the death of her husband, Dr. Alpesh I. Gandhi, who died in a bus accident owned by the Rotary Eye Institute. The insurer, New India Assurance, denied liability invoking a limitation of liability clause that excludes deaths occu…
LAL SINGH MARABIversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2017 INSC 14515 February 2017
The appellant, a 29‑year‑old professional driver, lost his left leg in a bus accident and claimed compensation under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal fixed his annual income at Rs 15,000 and a 60% loss of efficiency, awarding Rs 2,75,000. The High Court raised his income…
PRAKASH CHAND DAGAversusSAVETA SHARMA & ORS.
2018 INSC 121314 December 2018Dismissed
The appellant, Prakash Chand Daga, sold his Santro car to Saveta Sharma on 11 September 2009 and the vehicle was involved in an accident on 9 October 2009, injuring Rakesh Kumar. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.12.47 lakh, holding the driver and the first respondent (the buyer) liable. The…
M/S. TATA MOTORS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS
2018 INSC 120414 December 2018Dismissed
The appellants, manufacturers and dealers including M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., challenged tax assessments levied by the State of Jharkhand under Section 6 of the Bihar Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1994, which imposed tax on motor‑vehicle chassis while in the possession of the manufacturer or dealer before delivery. The key…
CITICORP. MARUTI FINANCE LTD.versusS. VIJAYALAXMI
2011 INSC 79314 November 2011Disposed off
The appellant Citicorp Maruti Finance Ltd. entered into a hire‑purchase agreement with the respondent for a Maruti Omni. After the respondent defaulted on monthly instalments, the bank repossessed the vehicle, informed police, and later auctioned it to a third party. The respondent filed a complaint before the Consumer…
ROOPWATI & ORS.versusRAM KISHAN & ORS.
2022 INSC 108914 October 2022Dismissed
Hari Ram died in a motor accident on 22 November 2010 while riding a three‑wheeler driven by Ram Kishan and insured by IFFCO Tokio. His wife, son and mother claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 4,33,000 using a multiplier of 9, based on an alleged age of…
RAM CHANDRA SINGHversusRAJARAM AND ORS.
2018 INSC 70014 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
A motor accident on 10 May 2012 resulted in the death of Sanoj Kumar. The victims filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded compensation but absolved the insurer on the ground that the driver, Shivgyani, held a fake licence. The vehicle owner appealed, arguing that the insurer should remain…
FIRDAUSversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2017 INSC 61714 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Parvez Khan was killed in a motor accident while driving a truck that was owned by defendant No.1 (Santosh Dental Hospital) and insured by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The claimant, the deceased's father, sought compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner award…
SUNITA & ORS.versusRAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR.
2019 INSC 20014 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a fatal road accident in which Sitaram, a government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle that collided with a bus owned by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and driven rashly by its driver. The claimants sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Cl…
M/S L.C.D.S. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE & ANR.
2013 INSC 3314 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed
M/S I.C.D.S. Ltd., a non‑banking finance company, purchased trucks and leased them to third parties, registering the vehicles in the lessees' names. The company claimed depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 at both the normal and higher rates, arguing it owned the trucks and used them in its leasing…
MEENA DEVIversusNUNU CHAND MAHTO @ NEMCHAND MAHTO & ORS
2022 INSC 108013 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
A 12‑year‑old boy died when a jeep struck him while he was playing outside his house. The mother filed a claim petition under Sections 140, 166 and 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking Rs 2,00,000 compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1,50,000 and the High Court enhanced it only to the claimed am…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHILA DATTA & ORS.
2011 INSC 75913 October 2011Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined whether a motor insurer can challenge a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award on the quantum of compensation and whether it may join the vehicle owner in an appeal. The Court held that when an insurer is impleaded as a party‑respondent, it may contest the claim on any ground and may jointly ap…
M/S. BAJAJ ALLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.versusRAMBHA DEVI AND ORS
2023 INSC 83213 September 2023Directions issued
The Supreme Court was asked to consider whether a holder of a light motor vehicle (LMV) licence may drive a transport vehicle of the same class (unladen weight up to 7,500 kg) without a separate endorsement. The issue arose from the earlier decision in Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Co., which had interpreted th…
A. SRIDHARversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2011 INSC 68013 September 2011Dismissed
A. Sridhar, while riding a motorcycle with a pillion rider, met with an accident on 14 January 1998 due to an oil spill on the road, sustaining grievous injuries. He filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking Rs. 6,00,000 as compensation, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 1…
D. SAMPATHversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2011 INSC 68113 September 2011Case Partly allowed
A pillion rider of a motorcycle insured by United India Insurance suffered injuries in an accident caused by an oil spill. A medical doctor certified that the rider had a 75% disability, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 3,50,000. The High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 4,90,000…
MATHEW ALEXANDERversusMOHAMMED SHAFI AND ANR.
2023 INSC 62113 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's son was driving a Maruti Alto that collided with a gas tanker lorry, killing him and five passengers. The police filed an FIR under IPC sections 279 and 304A, but the charges against the son abated due to his death. After a further investigation, the police submitted a final report stating the accident …
RAKESH KUMAR & ETC. ETC.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC.
2016 INSC 52513 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a fatal road accident in 2008 where a three-wheeler was struck by a truck. The victims' representatives filed claims under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the truck's owner, driver, and insurer. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the insurer liable, finding that the truck driver p…
MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTAversusVIJAY CHHIBBER & ORS.
2016 INSC 51913 July 2016Disposed off
The petitioner filed contempt petitions alleging that the respondents, including state transport authorities and the contractor M/s Utsav Safety Systems Pvt. Ltd., failed to implement the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) scheme in accordance with Supreme Court orders dated 8 December 2011, which prohibit sub‑co…
SHYAMWATI SHARMA & ORS.versusKARAM SINGH & ORS.
2010 INSC 40213 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed
A Sub‑Inspector aged 36 died in a motor accident, leaving six dependants who claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 14,44,600, which the Delhi High Court enhanced to Rs 14,65,776 by assuming future salary growth, a 30% tax deduction and a 13‑year multiplier. The…
HANUMANTHARAJU B (DEAD) BY LR.versusM AKRAM PASHA & ANR.
2025 INSC 68213 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Sub‑Inspector of the CRPF was injured in a road accident and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) initially awarded compensation based on a 61.94% disability assessed by a Medical Board, but on reconsideration a Commissioner appointed by the Tri…
M. C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 127813 April 2017Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the implementation of the National Auto Fuel Policy and Bharat Stage‑IV (BS‑IV) emission norms, which required that from 1 April 2017 no vehicle non‑compliant with BS‑IV could be sold or registered in India. Automobile manufacturers intervened, arguing that they could continue to sell their e…
SHASHIKALA & ORS.versusGANGALAKSHMAMMA & ANR.
2015 INSC 21213 March 2015Matter referred to larger bench
The deceased H.S. Ravi, a 45‑year‑old self‑employed transport businessman, died in a road accident on 14‑12‑2006. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 7,85,000 as compensation. The Karnataka High Court enhanced the award to Rs 14,69,372 by averaging the deceased’s income over two assessment years and applying …
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusMAHADEO KRISHNA NAIK
2025 INSC 21813 February 2025Disposed off
Mahadeo Krishna Naik, a bus driver for Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), was dismissed after a fatal accident in 1996. The Labour Court upheld his dismissal, but the corporation later obtained a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) award that placed sole blame on the lorry driver, a fact it failed…
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERSversusGOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU ETC. ETC.
2023 INSC 2713 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Himachal Pradesh government imposed a special road tax under s.3A(3) of the Himachal Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1972 on transport vehicles operating without a valid permit. The High Court struck down this provision, holding it to be a penalty and ultra‑vires the State’s legislative competence under List I…
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusBIRENDER AND ORS.
2020 INSC 3413 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased government employee died in a road accident caused by a negligent dumper driver, and her major married sons filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal awarded compensation based on the deceased's net salary, applying a 50% deduction for personal expenses and a multiplie…
SITHARA N.S. & ORS. ETC.versusSAI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
2025 INSC 142512 December 2025Dismissed
The appellants, legal representatives of two deceased motorcyclists, claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, alleging that a canter lorry driven by respondent No.1 caused the fatal accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Karnataka High Court dismissed the claims, finding tha…
N. MANJEGOWDAversusTHE MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.
2013 INSC 74912 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 36‑year‑old advocate, suffered grievous injuries including loss of strength and sensation in all four limbs after a motorbike accident. He claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and the Tribunal awarded Rs.6,17,500 as loss of future income based on a 50% whole‑body disability…
SEBASTIANI LAKRA & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.
2018 INSC 96712 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased employee died in a motor vehicle accident and his family claimed compensation under Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal awarded Rs 40,90,000, but the insurer argued that the monthly Rs 50,082 received by the family under the Employees Family Benefit (EFB) Scheme …
M. H. UMA MAHESHWARI & ORS.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2020 INSC 42412 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 after the death of the deceased, who was aged 50 years and 3 months, alleging loss of dependency and future prospects. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal applied a multiplier of 13, considering the deceased in the 40‑50 year age group…
DEEP SHIKHA & ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 67512 May 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the married daughter (appellant No.1) and the mother (appellant No.2) of a woman who died in a road accident. The High Court had reduced the daughter’s compensation to Rs.50,000 and dismissed the mother’s claim, relying on Manjuri Bera. The Court held that a married daughter ca…
B. KOTHANDAPANIversusTAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD.
2011 INSC 39312 May 2011Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a foreman, suffered partial loss of eyesight and amputation of a finger in a motor vehicle accident caused by the negligence of a state transport corporation driver. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him a total compensation of Rs.5,05,053.45, including Rs.1,50,000 for permanent disability. The …
SANJAY GUPTA & ORSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS
2022 INSC 42112 April 2022Directions issued
A fire broke out on 10 April 2006 at the India Brand Consumer Show in Meerut, killing 65 people and injuring 161. The victims filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking compensation from the event organizers (Mrinal Events and Expositions) and the State of Uttar Pradesh, alleging negligence and violation of the rig…
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusPEARL BEVERAGES LTD.
2021 INSC 24712 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed
Pearl Beverages' Porsche, insured with IFFCO Tokio, was destroyed in a high‑speed crash on 22 December 2007. The driver, Aman Bangia, was reported to have smelled of alcohol and was later convicted under IPC 279 for rash driving, but no breath or blood test was conducted. IFFCO Tokio denied the claim invoking an exclus…
RAJESH & OTHERSversusRAJBIR SINGH & OTHERS
2013 INSC 24812 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the widow and minor children of Bijender Singh, a 33‑year‑old clerk who died in a motor accident. They claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 8,96,500, which the High Court increased to Rs 10,17,000 after applying the Sarla…
U.P.S.R.T.C.versusKM. MAMTA & ORS
2016 INSC 16412 February 2016
The appellant corporation’s bus collided with a motorcyclist, leading to a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded Rs.24,73,252, which the corporation appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 173 of the Act. The High Court dismissed the appeal witho…
G. DHANASEKARversusM.D. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPN. LTD.
2014 INSC 9612 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 46‑year‑old tourist‑taxi driver, suffered fractures to his right arm and leg in a collision with a bus operated by the respondent. He claimed compensation under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, asserting functional disability of 35% that impaired his earning capacity. The Motor Accident Claims Tr…
HIMACHAL PRADESH BUS STAND MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HPBSM & DA)versusTHE CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE ETC. & ORS.
2021 INSC 1812 January 2021Disposed off
The Himachal Pradesh Bus Stand Management and Development Authority (HPBSM&DA) obtained a 99‑year lease on forest land that had been diverted for a parking space and a bus stand under Forest (Conservation) Act orders of 1997 and 2001. It then authorised a private contractor to construct a Bus Stand‑cum‑Parking Complex …
ALISTER ANTHONY PAREIRAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 1812 January 2012Dismissed
Alister Anthony Pareira was convicted for causing the death of seven labourers and grievous injuries to eight others by driving a car rashly and negligently while under the influence of alcohol. The Supreme Court examined whether a person could be tried and convicted under both s.304(Part II) IPC (culpable homicide not…
PUSHPA @ LEELA & ORS.versusSHAKUNTALA & ORS.
2011 INSC 3612 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The heirs of Prem Chand and labourer Nikku Ram filed claim petitions after a truck, owned by Jitender Gupta on the registration but possessed by Salig Ram, met with a fatal accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but held only Salig Ram liable, ignoring the fact that the registration still nam…
BABY SAKSHI GREOLAversusMANZOOR AHMAD SIMON AND ANOTHER
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 95811 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a child of seven years, suffered grievous injuries and moderate mental retardation in a motor vehicle accident, resulting in 75% disability which the Court treated as 100% for compensation purposes. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.5,90,750, which the Delhi High Court enhanced by Rs.5,60,000…
SANJEEV KUMAR SAMRATversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 57611 December 2012Dismissed
The owner of a goods vehicle insured the truck with National Insurance Co. and hired it to transport goods. During the journey the hirer and two of his labourers were killed in an accident. The legal heirs of the deceased filed claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the insur…
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusMANI BHUSHAN KUMAR
2011 INSC 74611 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The State Transport Authority of Bihar issued a temporary stage‑carriage permit for a vehicle to ply from Motihari (Bihar) to Siliguri (West Bengal) without the required counter‑signature of the West Bengal State Transport Authority. The vehicle was seized by the Motor Vehicle Department in Siliguri for lack of a valid…