High Court of Gujarat
NIRAVKUMAR AMRATBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Niravkumar Amratbhai Patel, filed a special criminal application before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent when the matter was called for hearing. The Court, noting the lack of representation, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The judges reserved liberty to file a fresh petition if necessary. No substantive merits of the case were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s counsel’s absence
Subjects
criminal procedurewant of prosecutionpetition dismissedhigh court order
Judgment
R/SCR.A/3967/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3967 of 2026
==========================================================
NIRAVKUMAR AMRATBHAI PATEL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS AKANKSHA S MISHRA(10571) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS KRINA CALLA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 24/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
When the matter was called out, learned advocate for the
petitioner is not remained present to assist the Court.
Hence, matter stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Liberty is reserved to le fresh petition, if need so arise.
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
(R. T. VACHHANI, J)
KUMAR ALOK
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: ALOK KUMAR(HC01091), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 24/03/2026 14:58:40
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "criminal procedure"Sign in to search