Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 3401–3600
The applicant, Rushabh Dattrao Solanke, was arrested on 15 April 2026 for alleged stalking and harassment of a woman, based on complaints that he repeatedly called, messaged, and pursued her since March 2024. He was detained for over one and a half months and his bail application was initially …
The applicant failed to appear before the High Court despite multiple notices and also defaulted on the maintenance payment of Rs.3,000 per month, accruing a arrear of Rs.1,23,000 even after depositing the earlier arrears of Rs.2.40 lacs. The respondent’s counsel urged the Court to vacate the stay …
The petitioner, Khalil Beg Husain Beg, filed a writ petition (No. 10130 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil appeal (No.3/2015) pending before the District Judge‑2, Bhusawal, was decided on 2 January 2019, a fact confirmed by the …
The applicant, Nivruti Laxman Alapure, a Munim (accountant) of Manjara Seeds Pvt. Ltd., sought bail in a case involving alleged misappropriation of soybean deposits under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the company failed to pay …
Sahebrao Narayan Borde filed a writ petition (21 WRIT PETITION NO. 4851 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Shantabai Harakchand Soni and others. The respondents, through counsel Mr. Darak, argued that the petition had become infructuous because of the …
The applicants filed a criminal application and later sought the Court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicants, on their instructions, moved the Court for such permission. The Court considered whether a criminal application can be withdrawn at the applicants' request. It …
These appeals arise from two reference court awards in LAR No. 80/1998 and LAR No. 32/1998 concerning acquisition of the claimants' lands for M.I.D.C. Dhule. The claimants and the acquiring body argued that the lands were from the same village, acquired for the same public purpose and under the same …
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. filed a first appeal before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, contesting a motor accident claim. The appellant, through Advocate M. R. Deshmukh, submitted withdrawal purses and an authority letter, indicating its intention to …
The petitioner, who is also defendant No.3, filed a writ petition seeking a decree for removal of encroachment, recovery of possession and perpetual injunction under Order XX Rule 12 of the Civil Procedure Code after a trial court had passed a ‘no say’ order for default because he failed to file a …
The applicant, Dilip Kachru Wadekar, filed a civil application seeking an interim order to prevent the respondents from obstructing a cart road that traverses land belonging to the respondents. He argued that a standing crop in his field was ready for harvest and any obstruction would cause serious …
Shahik Aziz Shahik Karim filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking an order for the registration of his birth. After filing, the petitioner, through his counsel, requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. He also sought liberty to approach the Judicial Magistrate First Class …
Milind Pandurang Jadhav filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others. The High Court held that the petitioner must first approach the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted under the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024. The Court directed the petitioner to file an …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2010 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from Venkat Jaywanta Pawar, alleging the enhancement and statutory benefits were unsupported by material and imposed an illegal burden on the public exchequer. The State argued that the reference court erred …
The petitioner, Parwatibai Parmeshwar Vesmode, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra for the failure to decide her representation dated 20 August 2025. The petition raised the issue of undue delay in adjudicating the representation. The …
The petitioners, a group of educational societies and headmasters, challenged two Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified their institutions from receiving grant‑in‑aid on the ground of alleged non‑compliance with prescribed norms. The petitioners argued that the …
Peoples Education Society filed an application seeking leave to amend its writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents opposed the amendment, relying on an affidavit-in-reply. The Court noted that the writ petition had not yet been admitted and therefore was inclined to permit the …
The petitioner, Dhananjay alias DhanU Vedant Doijad, filed a bail application (No. 930 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, on the ground of undue delay in the trial. The Court directed the applicant's counsel to obtain a schedule for concluding the trial, which was later …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to conduct an enquiry into allegations they raised. The Court, after reviewing the Resource Personnel report, found that the same allegations had already resulted in the registration of FIR C.R. No.60/2020 at …
The appellants' agricultural lands in Kalgaon village were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for flood rehabilitation, and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.1,110 per rupee. The appellants protested and sought a reference under Section 18, where …
The applicant, Sumit alias Om Shailendra Dure, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicant's counsel to seek withdrawal of the bail application and permission to file a fresh …
Ashutosh Dattatray Dahale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioner submitted a communication dated 16 June 2026 from the Deputy Superintendent of State Excise, Pune, indicating that his …
The petitioner, a Grampanchayat, challenged a Labour Court order that directed it to pay arrears of wages and leave‑encashment to a former employee who claimed to have worked from 2001 to 2012 regulating village water supply. The petitioner argued that a Grampanchayat is not an "industry" within …
The appellants' agricultural lands in Kalgaon village were acquired in 2006 for flood rehabilitation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.1110 per rupee, which the claimants accepted under protest and then sought a reference …
The petitioners challenged a communication dated 22 April 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad, which rejected their proposals for grant approval on the basis of a letter dated 28 May 2025 from the Director of Education. The petitioners submitted a Government Resolution dated …
The petitioners challenged a communication dated 22 April 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad, which rejected their proposals for grant approval on the basis of a letter dated 28 May 2025 from the Director of Education. The petitioners submitted a Government Resolution dated …
The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad appealed against the judgment and award dated 04‑07‑2013 in Land Acquisition Reference No. 701 of 2007, contending that the compensation for the dry land was excessively high. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs. 605 per R, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2010 award that fixed compensation for irrigated land at Rs 40,000 per acre after the land was acquired for a Benitura Medium Project. The claimants, whose land (2 ha 10 R) was similarly situated, sought a higher rate, arguing that other claimants in the same …
The petitioner, Aslam Khan Afzal Khan Pathan, challenged an order of the Deputy Charity Commissioner who held that he had not established how he acquired membership or his interest in the subject matter of the charity litigation. The petitioner submitted a change report along with documents …
Iranna Malikarjun Chinchore filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Hirabai Sidhram Chinchole and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a judgment in a related appeal rendered the writ petition infructuous. The Court considered whether the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on their representation dated 09 January 2023, which the respondent had not yet acted upon. The petition alleged undue delay and violation of their right to a timely administrative decision. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Aslam Khan Afzal Khan Pathan, filed writ petitions challenging an order of the Deputy Charity Commissioner who held that the petitioner failed to establish how he acquired membership and his interest in the charity matter. The petitioner submitted a change report together with …
The appellants' lands were acquired by the State for the Upper Manjra Project and initially awarded compensation of Rs.250‑330 per R under the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The reference court later enhanced the award to Rs.642 per R, which the appellants contested, arguing that a prior order …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications (Nos. 6057, 6059, 6061, 6063, 6065, 6067, 6069, 6071, 6074, 6076, 6078, 6080, 6082, 6084, 6086) seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in a land …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in a land acquisition matter. The applications argued that the delay was justified and that the appeals should be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking leave to correct the cause title of the proceedings. The petition also raised the issue of how a representation dated 28‑08‑2025 should be dealt with, including whether any measurement requested by the petitioners should be carried out. The Court granted …
The petitioners filed an application seeking restoration of Criminal Application No. 1287/2024, which had been dismissed for failure to file a required amendment within the prescribed time. The respondents opposed the restoration. The court examined the delay in filing the restoration application …
Petitioner Kailas Manohar Gaikwad filed a petition seeking a direction that his candidature be considered for the post of Surveyor Grade‑II under Rule 29(a) of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board Classification and Recruitment Regulations, 1961. The respondents filed an affidavit‑in‑reply …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were filed on behalf of the Division against multiple respondents. …
The petitioners, Dnyaneshwar Abhimanyu Wakade and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 363 of 2020) against Sugat Shankar Gamare and another respondent in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petition was presented before Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. On September …
The applicants filed three civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,056‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment of the reference court. The respondents appeared, but one respondent was not represented. The court examined the reasons for delay, finding them satisfactory and not …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were heard before Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar of the Bombay High Court, …
The State of Maharashtra and other authorities filed multiple first appeals challenging judgments and awards of a reference court in land acquisition matters involving Bhalchandra Bhimrao Patil and Trivenibai Shivaji Patil. The reference court had enhanced compensation up to four times the market …
The petitioner, a hard‑of‑hearing individual, applied for the post of Live Stock Supervisor under the 2023 advertisement for the PwD‑HH category and scored 94 marks, exceeding the qualifying mark of 90. Despite his eligibility, the authorities did not issue a call‑letter, citing an alleged improper …
The petitioners, a group of educational institutions, challenged Government Resolutions dated 1st and 2nd April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant-in-aid and ordered the closure of their schools without granting a hearing. The High Court held that the earlier decisions of the Kolhapur …
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 disqualifying several private educational institutions from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordering the closure of their schools without affording any hearing. The affected institutions filed writ petitions challenging the …
The applicants filed three civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,056‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment of the reference court. The respondents appeared, but one respondent did not appear despite being served. The court examined the applicants’ explanation for the delay and found …
The petitioners, a group of educational institutions, challenged Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordered closure of their schools. The High Court noted that the same issues had already been decided by a Kolhapur …
The applicants filed three civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,056‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment of the reference court. The respondents appeared, but one respondent did not appear despite being served. The court examined the applicants' explanation for the delay, finding …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications argued that the delay was justified and requested the court to allow …
The petitioners, appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Zilla Parishads and later promoted to Graduate Teacher pay scales, applied for inter‑district transfers. The 24‑April‑2017 Government Resolution required them to consent to a reversion to their original Assistant Teacher posts upon …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an unspecified action of the State of Maharashtra. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents argued that the passage of time had rendered the subject matter of the petition infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions pending before it in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of …
A group of sixteen first appeals arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Tapi Minor Irrigation Project in Dhule, where the appellants' dry lands were compulsorily acquired. The reference court had fixed compensation at Rs.1,20,000 per hectare (or Rs.1,10,000 for two cases), which the …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.6108 of 2005 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, applied for …
Petitioners Mahadeo Bhagoji Solankar & others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief concerning their representation. The Court granted leave to add the Sub Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer, Paithan, as an additional respondent. It further …
Petitioner Ayesha Siddiqua Masood Iqbal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition raised the issue of a pending proposal submitted by the petitioner on 30 July 2019 that had not been decided by …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798-5847 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against various respondents seeking relief. The petitions were initially taken on board by the Court. The petitioners, through their counsel, later instructed the Court to …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798-5847 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court against various respondents. The petitions sought relief, but the petitioners, through their counsel, decided to withdraw all the writ petitions. The Court first took petition No. 5802 on board and …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798-5847 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court against various individuals, primarily former employees, seeking relief. The petitions were consolidated before a single bench of Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. The petitioners, through their counsel, …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798-5847 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against various respondents seeking relief. The petitions were taken on board by the Court, with Writ Petition No. 5802 specifically noted as being taken on board. The …
Bajaj Auto Ltd filed ten writ petitions (Nos. 5798‑5847) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of various respondents. The petitions were listed before Justice S.S. Deshmukh. The petitioners, through counsel, sought to withdraw all the writ petitions. The Court took petition 5802 on board …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) against several respondents seeking various reliefs. The petitions were taken on board by the court. On instructions, the petitioners’ counsel requested withdrawal of all the petitions. The court …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798-5847 of 2014) against various individuals, primarily former employees, seeking relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitions were presented before Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. The court first took petition No. 5802 …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798-5847 of 2014) against various respondents seeking relief. The petitions were initially taken on board by the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through their counsel, subsequently instructed the withdrawal of all …
Bajaj Auto Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798‑5847 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, against various respondents seeking unspecified relief. The petitions were listed before Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. The petitioners, through counsel, requested that the petitions be …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798‑5847 of 2014) against various respondents seeking relief. The High Court initially noted that one petition was not on board and subsequently took all petitions on board. The petitioners, through their counsel, later instructed the court …
The applicant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed an application seeking condonation of a 24‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found it was neither deliberate nor intentional, thereby …
Bajaj Auto Limited filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 5798‑5847 of 2014) against various respondents seeking relief. The High Court took petition No. 5802 on board and, upon the petitioners' instructions, agreed to withdraw all the petitions. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the …
The petitioner, Abrar Muktar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police to arrest accused persons in two crimes, to transfer the investigations to an independent agency, and to provide protection and departmental action against police officials. The respondents …
The Renukadevi Shikshan Prasrak Sanstha filed a contempt petition seeking recognition to open a D.Ed college for the 2007‑08 academic year. The High Court directed that the petitioner must file an appeal within four weeks, after which the Appellate Authority must provide the State Government’s …
The petitioner, Mustafa Dilawar Khan Pathan, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in his writ petition against the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation, Chh Sambhajinagar. The court examined whether the procedural lapse could be excused. It held that the delay was condoned, …
The applicants, Faizal Bin Masud Chaus and others, filed a criminal application but failed to appear before the court. The court noted that even on 19 June 2026, no appearance was caused, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the application. Consequently, the court held that the application …
The matter before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, was Second Appeal No.45 of 2016 filed by GOPINATH SANGRAM HINGMIRE and others against RAMESH MADHAVRAO BUTTE and others. Two civil applications were filed: Application No.11243 of 2024 sought condonation of a 1,103‑day delay in filing a …
The petitioner, a prisoner, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to provide police escorts for prisoners requiring urgent medical assistance at a civil hospital. The petition sought a general direction for all such prisoners rather than a specific order for …
The petitioners challenged orders dated 27‑04‑2026 issued by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co‑operative Societies, which stayed their applications (Nos. 8/2025 and 9/2025). The High Court, on 08‑05‑2026, issued an interim order restraining the respondent APMC from allotting a suit plot to any …
The petitioner, Rajesh Vasantrao Joshi, challenged a order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, which had rejected his application to be impleaded as a defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 346 of 2025 filed by Rahull Dyandeo Sukte. The respondent‑plaintiff sought a declaration that the …
The petitioners challenged the validity of a registered agreement to sale dated 10 April 1991 and sought a declaration that it was void ab initio, along with a perpetual injunction against the defendants. They also contested a subsequent unregistered agreement to sale of 1996, arguing that the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of Section …
The appellant Bhaskar, a member of the Hindu Mang Scheduled Caste, alleged that while collecting his ration from the shop of respondent Sitaram, he was verbally abused with caste slurs and physically assaulted by Sitaram in the presence of villagers. A FIR was lodged, a charge‑sheet filed and …
The petitioner, Annasaheb R. Abhale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents regarding his representation dated 06/04/2026. The petition sought a directive for the respondents to consider the representation on its …
Shaikh Khaled Shaikh Yakub and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in the consideration of their representation dated 20 December 2022. The petitioners were represented by Advocate Mr. J. M. Murkute, while the State of Maharashtra was …
The petitioners, Shaikh Yakub and another, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a previous order directing the preparation of a corrected seniority list. The State of Maharashtra, through its Education Officer, filed an affidavit‑in‑reply stating that the corrected seniority list …
A writ petition (No. 7351 of 2015) was filed by Asaram Sampat Mandal against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel was absent on the scheduled hearing date. The court noted the non-appearance and recorded the matter for dismissal. No arguments or evidence were presented by …
The appellant, Branch Manager of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd, filed an application seeking a stay of the trial court's judgment and award after depositing the full compensation amount with interest in the trial court. The appellant is simultaneously challenging that judgment in a civil …
The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs.64,800 to the respondent, which was subsequently increased to Rs.82,800 by the Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal challenging the compensation amount. The High Court noted that the quantum involved was meager and, …
The petitioner, Neekita Suresh Ainlawar, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent State, represented by AGP Mr. N. B. Patil, argued that the contempt order had been complied with. The Court, after hearing counsel, found that the petitioner had indeed …
Shattari Abdul Navid Abdul Hafij filed Writ Petition No. 5443 of 2023 challenging clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of the Government Resolution dated 07‑08‑2012. The Bombay High Court noted that a related group of writ petitions had been decided on 30‑07‑2026, and that several petitioners had …
The petitioner, Jamir Kueshi Dadamiya Kureshi, filed Writ Petition No. 4703 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Union of India and another party. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due …
The appellant, Kishor Pawar, was convicted by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act and several sections of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping, rape, aggravated sexual assault, and attempted murder of a minor girl. He appealed, alleging false implication, lack of proof of the victim's minority, …
The writ petition filed in 2018 by Appasaheb Shankar Lembhe and others remained pending for several years. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on multiple occasions, including both morning and afternoon sessions on 24 February 2026 and again on 4 March 2026. The court, after giving the …
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, filed applications seeking condonation of delay for over six hundred first appeals filed beyond the limitation period against judgments and awards of the Reference Court. The court examined the applications, noting no serious challenge to the averments and no …
The petitioner, Ganesh Tukaram Waghmare, challenged an interim maintenance order of Rs.4,000 per month granted by the Family Court, Jalgaon, on the ground that he had been suspended from his Zilla Parishad job and was unemployed. He argued that he could not afford the payment, had to support his …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kanmal Jain, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel submitted a pursis seeking withdrawal of the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and marked the pursis as Exhibit X. Consequently, the writ …
The petitioner, Somnath Jalindar Shinde, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for the police to take criminal action based on a representation he submitted on 15 March 2026. The police station examined the representation, summoned the petitioner for inquiry, and found contradictions …
The appeal challenges a 2016 award of compensation in a land acquisition case (Reference No.216 of 2006) concerning land from Gaurgaon village for the Nagulgaon Storage Tank. The appellant argued that the dispute is identical to a prior appeal (First Appeal No. 1775 of 2011) decided by the same …
The applicants, Gokul Vitthal Khairnar and others, filed several applications seeking permission to withdraw the entire remaining amount along with accrued interest that had been deposited by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in the court. The respondent NHAI did not object, provided …
The applicants, Gokul Vitthal Khairnar and others, filed several applications seeking permission to withdraw the entire remaining amount, together with accrued interest, that had been deposited by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in the court. The respondent NHAI did not oppose the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …
The petitioner, Aslam Mehmood Qureshi, was detained for twelve months under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA) on the ground that he was a “dangerous person”. The detention order was issued on 27 January 2026, six months after the last offences (registered on 1 …
The petitioner, Sangita Siddharam Koli, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel, expressed a disinclination to grant the relief. The petitioner’s counsel then sought leave to withdraw the application. The court allowed …
Petitioner Nilkanth Haridas Pawar filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner died before the hearing, as confirmed by the bailiff's report. The Court noted that the petitioner's advocate had been elevated to the bench, prompting a notice. Considering the death of the …
The applicant, Jaganath Govindrao Phulare, sought the withdrawal of the full amount of an arbitration award of Rs.14,31,37,791 dated 28 December 2018, which had previously been challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and dismissed. The respondent, the Union of …
The petitioner filed a suit for declaration of title in 2010 which was decreed in his favour after the defendants failed to appear despite service of summons. Two years later the defendants filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC seeking to set aside the decree, alleging improper …
The acquiring authority filed first appeals against the judgment and award dated 27‑11‑2019 in three land acquisition references, but the appeals were lodged seven days after the prescribed period. The authority contended that the delay was neither deliberate nor negligent and cited a recent Supreme …
The acquiring body, represented by the Ex. Engineer of the Minor Irrigation Division, filed first appeals against a judgment and award dated 27‑11‑2019 in three land‑acquisition references. The appeals were lodged seven days after the statutory deadline, and the applicants sought condonation of this …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
The petitioner, Ganesh Sampat Shel ar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the State authorities to decide his representation dated 25 March 2021, alleging that he was omitted as the pillion rider in the accident that killed Rohit Rajendra Bagade on 8 August 2020. He claimed the …
The acquiring authority filed first appeals against the judgment and award dated 27‑11‑2019 in three land acquisition references, but the appeals were lodged seven days after the prescribed period. The authority contended that the delay was neither deliberate nor negligent and cited the Supreme …
The acquiring authority, represented by Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Parbhani, filed first appeals against a judgment and award dated 27‑11‑2019 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gangakhed in three land‑acquisition references. The appeals were filed seven days after the prescribed …
The Aurangabad bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a review application filed by Pandurang Narayan Patil, who contested a prior order that incorrectly stated he had superannuated. Patil sought to recall that statement and obtain the same relief granted to other petitioners in related writ …
The acquiring authority filed first appeals against the judgment and award dated 27‑11‑2019 in three land‑acquisition references, but the appeals were lodged seven days after the statutory deadline. The authority pleaded that the delay was neither deliberate nor negligent and cited a recent Supreme …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a matter that was already pending in a suit. The respondent argued that the suit had been disposed of, leaving no issue for the writ petition. The court examined whether the petition retained any relevance after the suit's disposal. Finding that the …
The acquiring authority, aggrieved by a judgment and award dated 27‑11‑2019 in three land‑acquisition references, filed first appeals after a seven‑day delay. The authority sought condonation of the delay, arguing it was neither deliberate nor negligent, and cited a Supreme Court decision (Sheo Raj …
The appellant, Noorjahan Begum, appealed against the Maharashtra State Waqf Tribunal’s order rejecting his application to amend his written statement in Waqf Suit No.75/2023 after the trial had begun. The amendment sought to incorporate references to documentary evidence already filed on record. The …
The applicants, who are the parents and sister of the husband, sought to quash an FIR registered under IPC sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 r/w 34 alleging physical and mental cruelty, assault and intimidation against the wife. The FIR and charge‑sheet contained only vague, collective allegations …
The petitioner, convicted by a Judicial Magistrate and appealing the conviction, was arrested during the pendency of his appeal and an order suspending his sentence conditioned on depositing 20% of the compensation awarded. He sought modification of this condition, arguing financial hardship and …
The petitioner, Vijaya Pralhad Shimpi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and other authorities to enforce an order of the District Consumer Forum, Dhule, against Credit Co-operative Society No.4. The petition alleged that the authorities had failed to act on …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, had earlier granted an ad‑interim order on 7 May 2024 directing the applicant to deposit 50% of the arrears of maintenance in the Family Court, Beed. The applicant failed to make any deposit and did not appear at the subsequent hearing on 14 February 2025, …
The petitioners, Ramavtar Sagarmal Saboo and others, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, the State, contested the petitions. During proceedings, the petitioners informed the court that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, rendering the …
The applicant, Ravi Pralhad Beldar, filed a bail application in the High Court at Aurangabad. During the pendency of the application, the investigation was completed and a charge sheet was filed. The applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh …
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a 19‑day delay in filing its first appeal, arguing the delay was not deliberate. The court, after hearing Mr. R.H. Dahat, accepted this explanation and …
The plaintiff, Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Application No. 6050 sought condonation of a 630‑day delay in filing its first appeal, arguing the delay was not deliberate. The Court, after hearing the applicant's …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two civil applications filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. The first application (No. 6050 of 2026) sought condonation of a 630‑day delay in filing a first appeal, and the Court found the delay was not deliberate and granted condonation …
The petitioner, Shubhesh Dilip Jain, is a guarantor for a credit facility extended by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. to an original borrower. Recovery proceedings were initiated, leading to arbitration where an award was passed, and subsequent execution applications were filed by decree holders. …
The applicant, Asadullakhan Mohammadkhan Pathan, filed Civil Application No. 5499 of 2026 seeking relief in a writ petition originally filed as WP/6796/2011. The application was filed 7 days after the prescribed period, raising the question of whether such delay could be condoned. The High Court …
The petitioner, Sunil Rahul Ghorpade, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University to include him among the selected candidates for twelve vacant Ph.D. seats and to treat the vacancy as twenty‑seven seats as per the Research Guide List. The …
The petitioner, Kuldeep Manohar Ghante, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection under the Criminal Procedure Code. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court indicated a …
The appellants, a group of agricultural landowners from Deoni (Kh) in Latur district, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Borol Storage Tank project. Earlier reference judgments (LAR Nos. 479/2007‑476/2007) had awarded …
The appellants, owners of lands acquired for the Borol Storage Tank project in Latur, filed first appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation. They relied on a prior judgment of this Court dated 25 March 2026, which had increased compensation for …
The applicant, a Maintenance Surveyor in the Bhusawal Land Records Office, was alleged to have demanded a bribe of Rs 1,000 from a complainant seeking mutation of land records and to have facilitated the payment through a co‑accused. The complainant was caught in a trap set up by the Anti‑Corruption …
The complainant, Rajabai Hanumant Hare, filed a private complaint alleging that four members of the Hare family assaulted her, threatened her, and outraged her modesty on 18 June 2010. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the complainant's testimony exaggerated and the eyewitness accounts …
Janardan Nathrao Kute and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra in deciding their representation dated 14 February 2024. The petitioners sought a judicial direction compelling the respondent to adjudicate the …
The Executive Engineer of the Sina Kolegaon Project appealed against a compensation award dated 13‑8‑2014, while the original claimants filed a cross‑objection (Stamp No. 5955/2017). Both parties argued that the dispute was identical to that decided in FA No. 3147/2017, which involved land from the …
The petitioner, Raffique Gaffar Memon, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quash of an FIR. The petitioner’s counsel reported that the petitioner could not be contacted and was not responding. The State’s counsel was present. The Court noted that the petitioner was absconding and showed no …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ahmednagar that enhanced compensation awarded to Baliram Bapurao Shivarage in a land acquisition matter. The compensation was increased by the reference court to an amount not exceeding four times the award …
Petitioner Siddharth Sahebrao Patkar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Collector regarding a representation he submitted on 10 February 2025. The petition sought relief directing the Collector to consider the representation on its …
The appellants challenged compensation awards granted by reference courts for land acquired for the Sina‑Kolegaon Medium Project, arguing that a 1994 sale (Exhibit 19) should be treated as a comparable transaction and that a uniform compensation rate should apply. The State and the acquiring body …
The applicant, a passing officer of Mahila Urban Cooperative Credit Society, was arrested in September 2025 for alleged participation in a large-scale fraud involving the siphoning of society funds, charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest …
The State of Maharashtra issued resolutions on 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 disqualifying several private educational institutions from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordering the closure of their schools without affording any hearing. The affected institutions filed writ petitions challenging the …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project, seeking higher rates and escalation on the ground of parity with similar acquisitions. The lands, classified as non‑irrigated and semi‑irrigated, were acquired under a notification issued on …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench dealt with three first appeals (Nos. 1105, 1104, and 1106 of 2005) filed by the Darade family against the State of Maharashtra. In Appeal No. 1105, two of the appellants were reported dead and the remaining appellants failed to appear, leading the court to …
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of a delay of approximately 2417-2418 days in filing their appeals, with the delay spanning from 28 July 2022 to 2 December 2022. The respondents contested the applications, but the court found no evidence of mala fides on their …
The Shantiniketan Co‑Operative Housing Society purchased 2 acres 20 R of land in 1966 but its name was never entered in the revenue records. Respondents 4 and 5 later bought the same open space in 2008 and obtained a mutation entry. The Society challenged the mutation, leading to a series of appeals …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed in 2017. All petitioners were government officials whose tenures had already expired in 2020. The Court observed that since the petitioners no longer held the positions from which the relief was sought, the petitions …
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed in 2017. All petitioners were government officials whose tenures had already expired in 2020. The Court observed that since the petitioners no longer held the positions from which the relief was sought, the petitions …
The petitioner, NANDABAI, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to decide her representation dated 21‑03‑2023 and to prevent deletion of sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Crime No.14 of 2023. The Court observed that a related Special …
The appellant, Machindra Baburao Gaikwad, challenged the compensation of Rs.1,339 per R awarded for land acquired for a canal project, seeking enhancement based on two sale deeds executed in May 2001. The lower Reference Court considered the later sale deed (Exhibit 17) and applied a 10% per annum …
Balaji Maruti Ravikar and Dnyaneshwar Maruti Ravikar were arrested in December 2025 for assaulting the informant's father with a deadly weapon, causing grievous injuries. The FIR (Crime No. 737 of 2025) led to charges under Sections 109, 308(4), 308(5), 190 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. …
The Executive Engineer of the Osmanabad Irrigation Project filed a civil application for a stay against Sudhakar Murlidar Pawar and others. The matter came before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, on a first appeal. The Attorney General for the State waived service of notice on the …
The petitioner, Nitinkumar Prabhakar Saner, filed a writ petition challenging the lower court's order rejecting his application for a stay and the termination order dated 08.08.2024. He sought directions for the pending appeal before the School Tribunal to be decided promptly, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Omprakash Gopalkrishna Khandelwal, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief regarding the requirement of his personal presence for recording a statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner offered to deposit Rs.10,000 as a show of bona fides and to …
The Zilla Parishad Nandurbar filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 182‑day delay in filing a petition for restoration of a second appeal that had been dismissed in default. The respondents opposed the condonation. The bench, relying on the Supreme Court’s principles in M.D.A. Chaudhary …
The appellants’ 0.36‑R land in Vaijapur was acquired for a left‑canal project and they were awarded Rs 48,204 as compensation. They filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhancement based on two sale deeds executed in May 2001, one showing a higher …
The applicants, Kamalbai Waman Dahiphale and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking an order for publication of a notice. The respondents, including Kachru Pandurang and others, opposed the application. The sole question before the court was whether …
The appellants' 0.34‑R land in Vaijapur was acquired for a canal project and they were awarded Rs.40,868 as compensation. They challenged the award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on two sale deeds dated May 2001 showing different per‑R rates. The Reference Court applied …
In the matter of Vijay Nandkishore Bhave v. Sukhvinder Singh, Kamal Singh Kange and Anr, the applicant sought permission to serve notice on Respondent No.1, who had not been personally served. The applicant requested time to effect service through newspaper publication. The court examined the record …
The claimants sought to withdraw 75% of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, subject to an undertaking to redeposit if an adverse order is later made. The court noted a prior order in a related first appeal that permitted such withdrawal under similar conditions, and the …
Bharat Babulal Sanghavi and others filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief concerning a representation they had submitted on 04.04.2026. The petitioners claimed that the District Collector had not yet decided their representation. They approached the High Court for a …
The petitioners filed multiple contempt petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, asserting that they had complied with the orders previously issued in each case. The petitioners, through counsel, submitted that compliance was complete for petitions numbered 57/2023, 673/2023, …
The appellants' 0.32 R of land in Vaijapur was acquired for a left canal project and they were awarded Rs 38,464 as compensation. They filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhancement based on two sale deeds executed after the Section 4 notification, one …
The claimants filed civil applications seeking withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited by the Acquiring Body following a prior court order. Relying on a similar order in a connected first appeal, they requested permission to withdraw 75% of the deposited sum with accrued interest, …
The applicant, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sought suspension of his six‑month simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.12,50,000, arguing that he was on bail during trial and appeal and had already deposited Rs.2,50,000. He further undertook to deposit an additional …
Dastagir Ajmoddin Pathan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representations to the Collector dated 13 June 1999 and 4 July 2022. The petitioner alleged that these representations remained undecided. …
Sharad Sitara Nikam filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 700 of 2023 seeking the addition of Sections 307, 326 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code to the charge sheet in C.R. No. 52 of 2023 lodged at Jinsi Police Station, Aurangabad. The court observed that a charge sheet had already been filed only under …
Asharani Satish @ Balaji Wadkar (Mali) and others filed a civil application before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Balasaheb Anant Kada and others. The court examined the reasons stated in the application. After consideration, the court allowed the …
The Executive Engineer of the Sina Kolegaon Project filed appeals challenging a 2014 award concerning land acquisition, while the original claimants filed a cross‑objection. Both parties agreed that the dispute was identical to that decided in FA No. 3147/2017 (MKVDC Through Ex. Engineer v. Jagdish …
The Executive Engineer of the Sina Kolegaon Project appealed against the award dated 13‑08‑2014 concerning land acquisition from claimants, while the claimants filed a cross‑objection (Stamp No. 5955/2017). Both parties submitted that the dispute is identical to that decided in FA No. 3147/2017 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Prashant Sukhdev Vidhate and Sushant Sukhdev Vidhate against the State of Maharashtra. A charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under Sections 74, 118(1), 115(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and …
The applicants, Balu Mahadu Gadkar and others, challenged a order dated 05.05.2022 issued by the Deputy Director of Land Records, Aurangabad, which rejected their appeal on the ground that Section 252(a) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not permit an appeal against the decision to condone …
The case involved a large group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants alleged that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was inadequate. The claimants …
The petitioner, Dnyaneswar Pralhadrao Renge, filed a writ petition seeking inclusion in the Shalarth Pranali and issuance of a Shalarth ID. The Court observed that the issues raised were identical to those decided in Writ Petition No.1520/2026 dated 04.03.2026. Relying on that precedent, the Court …
The case involved a large group of land acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court was too low and that the land was irrigated, seeking a higher rate and interest under Section 34 …
The petitioner, Shaikh Aref Namdar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief regarding an application he had submitted to the State Information Commission on 22 July 2025. The petition alleged that the Commission had not yet decided the application. The Court examined …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The applicants, relatives of the deceased, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of an FIR that alleged dowry demands, cruelty and abetment of suicide, invoking Sections 304B, 306 and 498A IPC against them. The FIR alleged that the informant's sister was harassed by …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
Akshay Meshok Ingale was arrested on 13 June 2024 in connection with Crime No. 521 of 2024 for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read with 34 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. He filed a third bail application, offering to deposit Rs 5 lakhs …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations, through its …
Petitioners married on 23 March 2025 but separated within a week and lived apart thereafter, having made unsuccessful attempts at reconciliation. They filed a petition under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking a decree of divorce by mutual consent and applied for a waiver of the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Additional District Judge‑I, Beed, which awarded compensation in several land acquisition cases (LAR Nos. 173/2005 to 191/2005). The State contended that the Reference Court had enhanced the compensation but not beyond four times the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Additional District Judge‑I, Beed, which awarded compensation in several land acquisition cases. The State argued that the reference court had enhanced the compensation beyond four times the amount fixed by the Land Acquisition …
The deceased was killed on 28‑02‑2009 when his rickshaw was struck by a tractor with an attached trolley. The mother, widow and children of the deceased claimed compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 6,20,000 and …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Additional District Judge‑I, Beed, which had enhanced compensation in several land acquisition cases. The State argued that the enhancement did not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, and that a …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
The State of Maharashtra and others appealed the judgment and award dated 10 April 2007 passed by the Additional District Judge‑I, Beed in several land acquisition reference cases (LAR Nos. 173/2005 to 191/2005). The appellants contended that the compensation enhancement ordered by the reference …
The petitioner, Danish Akhtar, filed a criminal revision application (No. 95 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through Advocate B.P. Pande, sought leave to withdraw the revision. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant leave to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 6518 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Due to the passage of time, the petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petition could no longer be …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment and award dated 10 April 2007 passed by the Additional District Judge‑I, Beed, in several land acquisition cases, alleging that the reference court's enhancement of compensation was improper. The reference court had increased the compensation but did not …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
