Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 3601–3800

SAKHARAM GENA SANGULE AND ANOTHERversusASHOK MANOHAR HATWATE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking permission to add the legal representatives of a deceased respondent to the title of an ongoing writ petition. The death of respondent No.2 was learned belatedly, causing a delay of 919 days in filing the application. The petitioners explained that …

KAVITA YOGESHWAR PATILversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 JALGAON AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …

ASHOK TOLARAM KAREDAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 DHULE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …

TUSHAR DIGAMBAR JOSHIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …

MANOJ RAMHARI FUTANEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …

SUBHASH LAXMAN TODKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Subhash Laxman Todkar filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been complied with. The court, after noting the compliance, disposed of the petition. No further arguments or evidence were …

NILESH SAHEBRAO SONAWANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought quashment of criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the CrPC for alleged abetment of suicide (IPC 306 read with 34) arising from the death of 18‑year‑old Shrikant, who allegedly committed suicide after alleged physical and mental harassment at Garudzep Academy. The …

SAKHARAM GENA SANGULE AND ANOTHERversusASHOK MANOHAR HATWATE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought to amend their writ petition after learning that respondent No.2 had died, requesting that the legal representatives of the deceased be added to the case. They filed a civil application for permission to bring those representatives on record, but the application was filed 919 …

SALIM ALIAS PAPYA KHAWAJA SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Salim Alias Papya Khawaja Shaikh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed a disinclination to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the bail …

MOHD JAVEED GULAM MOHIUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Amjad @ Pappu was arrested for assaulting a relative with a sword, an offence under Sections 109, 324(4), 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution highlighted the use of a deadly weapon, recovery of the sword and the accused's prior conviction, arguing that bail …

RAVI ABA DOLASversusSADHANA RAVI DOLAS

DISPOSED OFF

Ravi filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against a decree involving Sadhana. During the hearing, the appellant, through his counsel Mr. A.R. Gaikwad, submitted a written instruction dated 16‑06‑2026 expressing his desire to withdraw the appeal. The court recorded the …

ARVIND WAMAN DHUPKARversusINDUMATI ARVIND DHUPKAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Arvind Waman Dhupkar and others, filed criminal applications (Nos. 2569 and 2568 of 2009) before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, seeking relief against an order arising from earlier proceedings. The learned advocate for the applicants argued that the original …

ARVIND WAMAN DHUPKARversusINDUMATI ARVIND DHUPKAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Arvind Waman Dhupkar and others, filed criminal applications (Nos. 2569 and 2568 of 2009) before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, seeking relief against an order arising from earlier proceedings. The learned advocate for the applicants argued that the original …

BALIRAM SHAMRAO MORE AND ANRversusASHOK NAGNATH MORE

DISMISSED

The plaintiff claimed ownership of a 1000 sq.ft plot in Wadgaon, Osmanabad, based on a Kabala (order of the Tahsildar) and sought a perpetual injunction against alleged encroachment by the defendants. The defendants contested the validity of the Kabala, arguing it was not proved, and appealed the …

BALIRAM SHAMRAO MOREversusASHOK NAGNATH MORE

DISPOSED OFF

The plaintiff claimed ownership of a 1000 sq.ft plot in Wadgaon, Osmanabad based on a Kabala (order of the Tahsildar) and sought a perpetual injunction against the defendants who allegedly encroached by raising a tin‑shed. The trial court and the first appellate court upheld the plaintiff's title …

BHAUSAHEB SUKHDEO THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Bhau Saheb Sukhdeo Thorat filed Contempt Petition No. 417 of 2020 arising out of Writ Petition No. 1239 of 2018 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The State’s Additional Government Pleader, Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar, relied on an affidavit‑in‑reply of respondent No. 5 and the petitioner’s service …

KIRAN DNYANOBA DEVNALE (KHAROBE)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Kiran Dnyanoba Devnale, filed a second bail application alleging prolonged incarceration without substantial progress in the trial. The trial court report indicated that two witnesses had been examined and one was pending cross‑examination due to the non‑production of Muddemal …

BAJIRAO BABURAO CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABATED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard several criminal revision applications filed by Balu, Vishnu Apparao Kale, Bajirao Baburao Chavan and Vishnu Ramchandra Deokar against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant Bajirao Baburao Chavan submitted a death certificate during the hearing. …

CHINANNA VITHAL DAHILODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Chinna Vithal Dahilod, filed a bail application (Bail Application No. 956 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing, the court indicated its reluctance to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty …

RAVINDRA BABULAL JAINversusTHE CHIEF COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions pending before it in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of …

VYANKAT DATTARAO GUTTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vyankat Dattarao Gutte, filed a criminal writ petition and initially obtained documents and a brief from his counsel. However, he failed to engage any further lawyer or advance the matter in court. The court observed that this inaction indicated a lack of interest in prosecuting the …

SANJAY MANOHAR KUMBEPHALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sanjay Kumbephalkar, sought quashment of an FIR registered for alleged illegal operation of a de‑addiction centre, alleging offences under IPC Section 420, the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The prosecution argued that the centre was …

ANAND PRAFULLCHAND TANDUREversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGERversusBHASKAR SHIVDAS PATIL AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions (Nos. 5409 and 5418 of 2012) filed by Orion Ropes Pvt. Ltd. against different respondents. Court service notices were served on the petitioner on 15 March 2014 and 29 April 2014 respectively. The petitioner failed to file any …

ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGERversusVITTHAL MADHUKAR CHAVAN AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

Orion Ropes Pvt. Ltd., through its manager, filed two writ petitions (Nos. 5409 and 5418 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging unspecified orders. Court service notices were served on the petitioner on 15 March 2014 and 29 April 2014 respectively. The petitioner failed to …

DATTAPRASAD VISHNUDAS CHANDAKversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

DIPALI DINESH BHAYEKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SADHNA PRAMOD KUMAR SANCHETIversusRAMLAL KESHARCHAND LODHA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, three women, filed a regular civil suit (No. 103 of 2013) seeking partition and separate possession of ancestral property against their parents, brothers and sisters‑in‑law. During trial they applied for an adjournment to cross‑examine Defendant 5 and later sought to amend the …

KIRANKUMAR RAMVILAS CHANDAKversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I LATUR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

ANIRUDHA GOVIND MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the lands were irrigated and that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the …

SHAIKH ZAFAR SHAIKH AFSARversusRAJE N LONDHE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Court considered a contempt petition filed by Shaikh Zafar Shaikh Afsar against respondents Raje N. Londhe and others. The petition arose from an interim contempt order that had been issued earlier. Subsequently, the original writ petition (WP/845/2011) was disposed of by an order dated 29 …

LAXMANRAO NANASAHEB PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Laxmanrao Nanasaheb Pawar filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release pending trial. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution filed the charge sheet. The applicant's counsel, Mr. A.B. Pakhe, requested permission to withdraw the bail …

ANAND AMBADAS PHALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Anand Ambadas Phalkar filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra but delayed filing it by 106 days. The applicant sought condonation of this delay through Criminal Application No. 1878 of 2026. The court examined the reasons provided in the application and determined that the delay …

ANAND AMBADAS POHALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Anand was convicted under IPC sections 354 and 354-A(2) and POCSO Act section 8 for allegedly touching a minor victim's hand while she was riding his rickshaw. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of his three‑year sentence and bail, arguing that as a rickshaw driver he could not have …

MOHAMMAD EJAZ MOHAMMAD RIYAZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Mohammad Ejaz Mohammad Riyaz, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, Mr. K. H. Dongre, sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the bail application was disposed …

SANJAY ELECTRICALS AND APPLIANCESversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

VIKAS CHANDRAKANT DALVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Vikas was convicted by a Special Court under the POCSO Act and sentenced to a term of up to three years. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 350 of 2026). The State opposed, arguing that the conviction was final and the …

ARUN PANDURANG MORE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …

SHRIPATI GOVIND MORE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging it was too low and that the land was irrigated, not dry. The acquiring body appealed, contending the award was …

MOHAN RANGRAO MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …

KISHOR ARVIND PURIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 1

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

VITHAL KRISHNANATH DONGRE AND 45 ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A contempt petition filed in 2010, which only came on board in 2011, sought enforcement of a court order directing the decision of an application for rental compensation. The court noted that other contempt petitions arising from the same order had been disposed after the order was complied with by …

SHILADEVI SUDHIR TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mrs. Shiladevi Sudhir Tiwari applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief for offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(2), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial …

DATTATRAY VAJINATH BOKADEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court …

SHIVAJI NARAYAN KASALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shivaji Narayan Kasal was convicted under IPC sections 324, 341, 504 r/w 149, 143, 148 and fined by the trial court on 24 March 2022, a conviction that was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed on 7 May 2026. Kasal had been on bail throughout the trial and the appeal, but was later arrested …

VISHAL KESHARMAL BRAHMECHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAMKUMAR HERGUNIDAS PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAM GANPATI MORE L.RS. ANJALI RAM MORE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …

KISHOR DINKAR SANAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kishor Dinkar Sanap, filed a writ petition (No. 1412 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over time, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after noting the petition was no longer viable, disposed of it as …

KAUSHABAI BHUJANGRAO MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, while the acquiring body …

STATE OF MAHAversusNILKANTRAO APPARAO PATIL

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against four land acquisition awards dated in 2003, contending that the reference court had enhanced compensation only up to four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer and had omitted interest, statutory benefits, and rental compensation. The …

LAXMIKANT SHALIGRAM MANIYARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 HINGOLI AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

VINOD BABRUWAN HULSUREversusUDHAVRAO PANDURANG GAMBHIRE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner applied to the trial court for temporary custody of his minor daughter during a vacation period (10‑05‑2022 to 30‑05‑2022), but the application was rejected. He filed a writ petition challenging the rejection, and subsequently filed another application for temporary custody, which was …

KIRANKUMAR RAMVILAS CHANDAKversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 LATUR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

DILIP S/O. ASARAMJI SOLUNKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Dilip Solunke, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving this submission, disposed of the petition without further hearing. No …

KARBHARI THANA SONAWANE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 18-08-2026. The court recorded the absence of counsel for the petitioners and, noting that no petitioner was present, dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was entered as a final order, and any …

VISHAL KESHARMAL BRAHMECHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SUYOG SUNIL KOTECHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

TUKARAM VIJAY PAMPATWARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SIDDHARTH SANJAY BOPALKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

TEJRAO SAKHARAM MIRGEversusM/S. SIDDHESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA MARYADIT

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Tejrao Sakharam Mirge, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dated 03‑04‑2019 that dismissed his 2015 unfair labour practice complaint on the ground that a separate factory‑level agreement existed. The petitioner failed to produce the alleged agreement …

RAVINDRA BHASKAR SONAVANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, represented by Mr. A.D. Sonkawade, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the police station to take cognizance of complaints dated 18‑05‑2021, 26‑05‑2021 and 02‑06‑2021 and to register FIRs. The court noted that the disputes involved rival groups in the Jalgaon Zilla …

RAMKUMAR HERGUNIDAS PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I NANDED AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAMESH KISAN KHEDKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHER

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

KARAN JAYESH GANGARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I LATUR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

PRIYANKA W/O. SHUBHAM MHASKE.versusSHUBHAM S/O. BHAGWAN MHASKE AND ANR.

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Priyanka, filed a Family Court Appeal which was found to be within the prescribed time limit. The respondent filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay for the appeal. The court examined the office note confirming the timely filing of the appeal. Since the appeal was …

DADARAO SONAJI SONNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioner, Dadarao Sonaji Sonne, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The court noted that in a similar matter (Civil Application No.10621 of 2019) it had previously condoned delay. Relying on that precedent, …

TULJIRAM YEDBA PATULEversusMOHAN BHAGWAT GAIKWAD

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and requested that the Civil Judge Junior Division, Paranda, be directed to decide Regular Civil Suit No.392/2014 within three months. The respondent's counsel appeared. The High Court, after noting the petitioner's request, …

RAMRAO BHAURAO RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a 2014 order by the State Minister (Revenue) that allowed a revision of a land consolidation scheme in Wanjarkheda village, Latur district, originally finalized in 1974 under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The scheme had …

RAMESH KISAN KHEDKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHER

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAJENDRA ASARAM CHARKHAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusRAMRAO DHONDIBA MADHEKAR AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 1961/2013) before the National Lok Adalat at the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, against Ramrao Dhondiba Madhekar and others. The insurer, through its counsel Mr. Abhijit G. Choudhari, submitted written instructions to withdraw the …

VINAYAK SADASHIV JADHAVversusHIRALAL JADHAV

Withdrawn

The petitioner, represented by Mr. R.A. Jaiswal, sought to withdraw a series of contempt petitions (Nos. 415 of 2018, 89 of 2019, 284 of 2020, 285 of 2020) and criminal writ petitions (Nos. 423 of 2019 and 1385 of 2023) pending before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court noted the …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusANITA GANESH MALI AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Shriram General Insurance Co. filed a first appeal (No. 1962/2013) before the National Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench. The insurer, through its counsel, submitted written instructions (Exhibit X) to withdraw the appeal. The panel, noting the withdrawal purses, disposed of the …

GITA VAIBHAV SABLE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, a police constable and a driver, were charged with offences arising from a road‑side quarrel on 11 April 2026 that resulted in injuries to the complainant. They filed an anticipatory bail application, arguing that the incident was spontaneous, there was no pre‑meditation, the …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.versusPRABHAKAR NAMDEO KADAM AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Shriram General Insurance Co. filed First Appeal No. 1960/2013 before the National Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench. The insurer, through its counsel Mr. Abhijit G. Choudhari, submitted a written instruction (Exhibit X) to withdraw the appeal. The Lok Adalat accepted the …

RATNAMALA ALIAS GAURI BHAGWAN WADGHULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ratnamala @ Gauri Bhagwan Waghule, filed a bail application and subsequently sought modification of clause ‘F’ of the court's earlier order dated 07.05.2026, which required the production of an Aadhar card and PAN card as identity proof. Counsel highlighted that the applicant is a …

BALRAJ PRAKASH PANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation challenging the land acquisition for the proposed Jalna Township Project at Kharpudi village. The petitioner submitted a copy of a notification dated 23-29 July 2020 showing that the land acquisition had been denotified. The court observed that this …

SARDAR SHAHWALI KHANversusSHRIKANT SINGH and OTHERS

Withdrawn

The petitioner, represented by Mr. R.A. Jaiswal, filed a request to withdraw a series of contempt petitions and criminal writ petitions pending before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitions involved various prisoners and state officials, each with different respondents and counsel. …

VINOD KUMAR OMPRAKASH MUNDADAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHER

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAVINDRA SUBHAH BORDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant was arrested for murder under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, stemming from a dispute where the deceased stabbed the appellant and the appellant allegedly assaulted the deceased, leading to the latter's death. The …

KISAN DEVRAM GAFALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kisan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No.0250/2025 and the pending Sessions Case No.69 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 64, 329(1), 329(3), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, respondent No.2, filed an …

VISHNU S/O. ACHUTRAO SHINDE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS KAMLABAI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE BEED AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

A group of first appeals filed by various claimants sought condonation of a delay of roughly 1,000 days in filing the appeals against awards. The respondents’ second party was served but did not appear. The applicants explained that the delay was due to non‑receipt of compensation, the need for …

VISHNU S/O. BHAURAO HAKE SINCE DEAD THROUGH LEGAL REPR. SHAKUNTALA W/O. VISHNUPANT HAKE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE BEED AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants filed a group of first appeals against the State of Maharashtra (District Collector, Beed) seeking relief under civil applications. The appeals were filed after a delay of about 1,000 days, which the respondents contested. The claimants explained that the delay was due to non-receipt …

DINESH BHAUSAHEB GALHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Dinesh Bhausaheb Galhate, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, claiming custody since 13 January 2022. The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed reluctance to grant bail and the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, which the …

RAJARAM S/O. GANPATI NAKURE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL REPR. LAKHUPATIBAI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, BEED AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered a group of first appeals filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra. The appeals were delayed by about 1000 days, and the respondents’ second party did not appear. The claimants explained the delay, citing non-receipt of …

ANNAPURNA W/O. HARIBHAU HARE THR LEGAL REPR. HARIBHAU SINCE DEAD THR LEGAL HEIRS BHASKAR AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, BEED AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

A group of first appeals filed by various claimants against the State of Maharashtra were delayed by about 1000 days. The claimants explained the delay, citing non-receipt of compensation and the need to obtain a corrected award copy. The court found the delay was not intentional and, in the …

JAYASHRI NIWAS BHUJANG AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicants filed a criminal application seeking relief after the trial court in Sessions Case No. 252 of 2021 acquitted them. The applicants' counsel submitted that the acquittal left no issue for the court to consider. The State's counsel agreed and placed the trial court judgment on record. …

DATTATRAY UMAKANT LAKHADIVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay dismissed two anticipatory bail applications filed by the former branch manager, Namdeo Ramrao Gaddime, and the accountant, Dattatray Umakant Lakhadive, who were accused of orchestrating a large‑scale fraud in a cooperative credit society. The FIR alleged that the accused …

LOVEKUSH VINAYAK RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Lovekush Vinayak Rathod, filed Contempt Petition No. 202 of 2013 arising out of Writ Petition No. 9004 of 2012 against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief on the ground that the respondents had allegedly committed contempt of the court. During …

DATTATRAYA BABURAO KALEversusRENUKA ANIL DAHIWAL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Dattatraya Baburao Kale (deceased) represented by Rohini Dattatraya Kale and others, filed a writ petition seeking an order that the trial court expedite the hearing of Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2012 against the respondent Renuka Anil Dahiwal. Both parties agreed that, given the …

RAMA PANDURANG SARTAPEversusPANDURANG KISHANRAO SARTAPE

DISPOSED OFF

A writ petition (No. 6512 of 2015) was filed by Rama Pandurang Sartape against Pandurang Kishanrao Sartape. The petition was examined by the High Court at Aurangabad. The Court observed that the parties were ad idem, meaning there was no substantive dispute between them. Consequently, the Court held …

JENYA S/O. HURJI GAVITversusSANJAYKUMAR SHAH AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Jenya, filed a criminal revision application (St.) No.153 of 2019 challenging an earlier order. The learned trial court had already disposed of RCC No.50/2018 on 10 March 2022, thereby extinguishing any remaining cause of action. Counsel for the applicant argued that, because the …

DHANRAJ DHANANJAY DATTU DATAL AND OTHERSversusANANT MADHAVRAO SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a stay order dated 22‑11‑2012 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Latur, which halted proceedings in appeal No. 2011/ROR/A/128. The stay was based on a pending civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 538 of 2012) filed by different parties to contest the same Tahsildar order …

RAHUL GANPAT JAWAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Rahul Ganpat Jaware filed a writ petition challenging an order and sought to contest it by filing a revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner’s counsel, Satyajit S. Bora, argued that the order was amenable to revision. The Court observed that the …

KOMALSING HARISING PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Komalsing was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.21,281. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the hearing of his appeal …

SACHIN PRAKASH BHADREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, a Rural Housing Engineer, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR alleging fraud under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code for misappropriating funds under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana scheme. The prosecution’s case is based on an …

RAVI SHRIVIAS MAIDEWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Ravi Shrivias Maidewad filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court was not inclined to grant bail, and the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Manojkumar Ramchandra ZawarversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1 Jalna

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

NIVRUTTI NAMDEO TEKALE AND ANRversusRAJU SURESH RAGDE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants Nivrutti Namdeo Tekale and another filed First Appeal No.969 of 2021 against Raju Suresh Ragde and others. Both parties appeared before the Bench and submitted a compromise deed dated 25 June 2026 indicating an amicable settlement of the dispute. The deed was taken on record and …

Manojkumar Ramchandra ZawarversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1 Jalna

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAZIUDDIN MOHD NAZIRUDDINversusRAMA DASHRATHA JADHAV AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner Raziuddin Mohd Naziruddin filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 1 April 2023 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, in an application filed under Exhibit‑689 in Regular Civil Suit No.1007 of 1989. While the writ petition was pending, the underlying civil suit …

Manojkumar Ramchandra ZawarversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1 Jalna

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SHAKUNTALABAI TUKARAM GATTEversusVENKAT NARAYAN VALSE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shakuntalabai Tukaram Gatte, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the dispute had become infructuous. The court examined this submission and found no need for further …

Ravindra Prakash Chand JethaniversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1, Nanded

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

KALYAN BHAUSAHEB BARHATE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, convicted in Sessions Case No. 367 of 2025 for offences under Sections 332, 323 and 353 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a criminal application seeking suspension of their substantive sentence and release on bail pending the hearing of their appeal. The Additional …

Ravindra Prakash Chand JethaniversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1 Nanded

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

Ravindra Prakash Chand JethaniversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1 Nanded

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

Ravindra Prakash Chand JethaniversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1 Nanded

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SAVITA PARSHURAM PARATWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Savita Parshuram Paratwad, filed a contempt petition (No. 584 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. T.S. Kotkar, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court held that there was no longer any …

Ravindra Prakash Chand JethaniversusIncome Tax Officer Ward 1, Nanded

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

SARANGDHAR WAMAN DIKEversusSTATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sarangdhar Wawman Dike, challenged an order of the District Co‑operative Election Officer that rejected his objection to the nomination of respondent 5 as the delegate of respondent 3 (a co‑operative society) for the election of the Aurangabad District Central Co‑operative Bank. The …

YOGESH CHINTAMAN DEORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Yogesh Deore and others, filed an application to quash FIR No.599 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC based on a complaint by the wife (respondent No.2). The court observed that the FIR contained only vague, omnibus allegations without any …