Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 4201–4400
The petitioners filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership, possession and a declaration that a sale deed in favour of the third respondent was void, and later moved to implead the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation as a fourth defendant. The trial court allowed amendment of the plaint but rejected …
Bhanudas, son of Shriram Uttwar, filed Writ Petition No. 6956 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Amol Ashok Kokad, later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 03‑06‑2020 issued by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, and a subsequent corrigendum dated 16‑10‑2020 that altered the Commissioner’s earlier finding that a 06‑01‑2015 order of the Sub‑Divisional Officer was confirmed. They argued that the …
The Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation appealed a 2012 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from Gousiya Begum and others, arguing that the increase was unsupported and that statutory benefits were improperly granted. The respondents relied on oral and documentary evidence, …
Jitendra Vaijnathrao Patil filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.06.2026 by the Education Officer that his service was to be absorbed. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a copy of a subsequent order dated 05.08.2026 which cancelled the earlier absorption order. The Court observed that …
The applicants, Shaikh Gudu Miran Saheb and others, filed a civil application and an appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They were represented by Ms. Fatema S. Kazi and Mr. S. S. Kazi. During the pendency of the proceedings, the applicants sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The …
Shivaji Laxman Digule filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not paid rental compensation as ordered by the Court. Respondent No.4 submitted a letter dated 12 March 2014 confirming that the rental compensation had been paid to the petitioner. The Court recorded the …
The petitioner, Drupadabai Appasaheb Karale, filed a contempt petition (No. 336 of 2013) alleging non-compliance with a prior order. The respondent State, represented by A.G.P. N.B. Patil, submitted a letter dated 12 March 2014 indicating that rental compensation had been paid to the petitioner, …
Shankar Nathabhau Dole filed a contempt petition (No. 331 of 2013) alleging that he had not received rental compensation due from the State of Maharashtra. The Court observed that, given the lapse of time, it could be presumed that the petitioner had already received the compensation. Moreover, the …
The petitioner, Shobhabai Kaluba Geete, filed a contempt petition alleging that she had not received rental compensation awarded by the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed in 2013 but had not been circulated for several years. The Court noted that the passage of time creates a presumption …
The petitioner, Manik Ambadas Pokharkar, filed a contempt petition (No. 335 of 2013) alleging that he had not received rental compensation due to him. The Court noted that, given the lapse of time, it is presumed that the petitioner must have received the compensation. Additionally, the petition had …
The petitioners, a group of individuals, challenged recovery orders passed by the State of Maharashtra that required them to pay certain amounts. They contended that the orders were illegal and that they were entitled to a refund of the amounts recovered along with all consequential retiral …
The appellants, owners of lands acquired in 1994 for the resettlement of earthquake‑affected villagers, challenged the Land Acquisition Reference Court's award of Rs.400 per rupee and sought enhanced compensation on the principle of parity with similar cases. They argued that their lands possessed …
Ramkisan Dagduba Tangde filed a contempt petition (No. 334 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra and others, alleging non-payment of rental compensation. The State, through an affidavit, asserted that the compensation was calculated according to government policy and had already been paid to the …
Rustam Appaji Tangde filed a contempt petition (No. 337 of 2013) alleging that he had not received rental compensation from the State of Maharashtra. The Court noted that, given the lapse of time, it is presumed the petitioner must have received the compensation. Moreover, the petition had not been …
The petitioners, Vishnu Sampatrao Yadav, Dnyandeo Babasaheb Naik, and Lahanibai Rangnath Mahajan, filed contempt petitions (Nos. 329, 330, 332 of 2013) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, Mr. R.U. Gavhane on behalf of Adv. Karhale and Ms. Bhagyashree S., sought the Court's …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. R.U. Gavhane (on behalf of Adv. Karhale) and Ms. Bhagyashree S., filed three separate contempt petitions (Nos. 329, 330, 332 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners sought the Court's permission to withdraw these contempt …
Sheshrao Dattshetti Tuptewar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order of the State Bank of India's Deputy Managing Director and to compel the bank and its officials to follow a 2013 circular on the rotation-based allocation of cases to panel advocates, including himself. The petitioner argued …
The petitioners sought to amend a land reference filed under the Land Acquisition Act, claiming that a clerical error had listed 19 mango trees instead of the actual 300. The amendment was sought under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but the trial court rejected the application, …
In Writ Petition No.7643 of 2026, the petitioner, Sachin Ratnakar Deshmukh, moved a motion before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking correction of a clerical error in the order dated 22/07/2026. The petitioner contended that the date mentioned in the second line of the first paragraph, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 04.05.2026 passed by the Additional Commissioner in Review Application No. 246/2024, which upheld an earlier order dated 28.08.2024 in Revision Application No. 153/2023. They contended that although a revision and a stay application …
The petitioner, Vitthal Tukaram Kapse, filed a criminal writ petition on 8 June 2026 challenging an order dated 4 January 2023 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, which had allowed condonation of delay in a maintenance application on the condition that 25% of the maintenance amount be deposited …
The petitioner, Gopal Iraba Tembhurne, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Election Commission of India. During the pendency of the case, subsequent events caused the petition to lose its basis, leaving nothing surviving in the petition. The Court examined the lack of any remaining …
The petitioner, Dattu Sopan Narsinge, filed a contempt petition against Sanjay Shirsagar. The petitioner, through counsel R.D. Biradar, moved before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, to withdraw the contempt petition on his own instructions. The Court, presided over by Justice Rohit W. Joshi, …
The petitioner, Shaikh Shahrukh, was acquitted by the Sessions Court in a criminal matter. A revision application (No. 102 of 2020) was filed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the acquittal. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Ashwini P. Patil, argued that the acquittal rendered …
The wife filed a Section 24 CPC application seeking transfer of a marriage petition and a civil suit from Buldhana to Jalgaon, alleging the 115‑km distance, lack of accompaniment and financial hardship. She also argued that her pending Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) case in …
The petitioners, Baban @ Kisan Patilba Kawad and another, filed a criminal writ petition challenging actions of the Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar and others. The State responded by placing on record a communication dated 16 February 2022 indicating that a departmental enquiry against …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …
The applicant, Nilesh Nitin Kadam, filed four anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 965, 966, 967, 968 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the applications, the applicant was arrested, leading the court to consider the effect of the arrest on the pending …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking recall of an order dated 7 April 2026 that dismissed their writ petition for want of prosecution. The application was filed three days after the dismissal order, and the petitioners claimed they were unaware of the order. The court considered whether …
Nilesh Nitin Kadam filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing both sides, the applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, having shown disinclination to grant bail, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the …
The applicant, Pandurang Sudam Shravane, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The trial court had adjourned the proceedings to 22 September 2026 for framing of charge, and the applicant sought liberty to withdraw the bail application and re‑file it if the trial did …
The applicant, Nilesh Nitin Kadam, filed four anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 965, 966, 967, 968 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the applications, the applicant was arrested, leading the court to consider the effect of the arrest on the pending …
Ashok S/o Mulchand Agrawal filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals should be heard by the District …
Ashok filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals should be heard by the District and Sessions …
The petitioner, Shailendra Satyanarayen Thakur, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashment of Rule 20 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2018. The Court, after noting the Resource Personnel report, observed that the petitioner had already been …
The applicant, Nilesh Nitin Kadam, filed four anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 965, 966, 967, 968 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the applications, the applicant was arrested, leading the court to consider the effect of the arrest on the pending …
Ashok Agrawal filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeals should be heard by the District and Sessions …
The applicant, Ashok Agrawal, filed multiple applications for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of these leave applications to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
Ananda filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1127 of 2020 against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later submitted a written communication stating that he had received his deposits along with accrued interest and wished to withdraw the petition. The court recorded this communication as Exhibit X. …
Ashok Agrawal filed multiple applications seeking leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to request that the appeals be transferred to the District and Sessions …
Sunil Shridhar Mhaske filed a bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad bench, while the investigation in the underlying criminal case was still pending. During the pendency of the bail application, the investigating agency completed its investigation and filed a charge-sheet. The …
The petitioner, Pragat Maharashtra Mandal Degloor, filed Writ Petition No. 8458 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through its counsel, submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court …
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (924 WRIT PETITION NO. 6801 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief related to Regular Civil Suit No.45/2013 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bhokardan. The petition alleged that the civil suit was still pending …
Two writ petitions were filed by groups of students against the State of Maharashtra challenging the non‑implementation of directions issued by the District Level Grievance Redressal Committee, Latur, dated 18 September 2025. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Shirsat Suhas R, sought a court order …
The petitioners filed writ petitions in 2020 concerning matters that had been pending since 2016 and 2021. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Bhagwan A. Husale, was absent and no representative appeared for the petitioners in both the morning and afternoon sessions on 16 April 2026. The court noted the …
The petitioners, Kisan Vitthal Borate and others, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik, decide their appeal under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 within a fixed period. Their earlier applications …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Pandurang Wamne, a Block Education Officer, who was charged under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding Rs.2,500 to recommend the continuation of a Special Teacher's service. The prosecution claimed the demand …
The applicant, Akash Alias Akya Dinkar Saudagar, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, on 15 September 2026, recorded its disinclination to grant bail and adjourned the matter to allow the applicant's counsel to take instructions. On 21 September 2026, …
The petitioner filed a contempt petition arising from a prior order dated 7 October 2025. During the pendency of the petition, Respondent No.3 complied with that order, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the court of the compliance. The court accepted the statement that the order had been …
The petitioner, a charitable trust, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a 2010 Board Resolution and allotment letter by CIDCO that allocated a plot in New Aurangabad to another trust (Respondent No.3) and to have the plot allotted to the petitioner instead. The petitioner argued that its …
The petitioners, Kalyan Raghunath Barhate and another, filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd (MSEDCL). MSEDCL contended that the petitioners' application was deficient and required submission of specific documents, notifying them on 27 …
The petitioner, Dr N J Paulbudhe Institute of Technology, filed a writ petition challenging the non-availability of the Central Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CGIT-1) in Mumbai at the time of filing. The petition sought relief pending the filing of an appeal before the Tribunal. The …
The petitioners, Madhukar Uddhav Bhagwat and others, filed R.C.S. No.249 of 2024 seeking a declaration and a temporary injunction against the State of Maharashtra (through the Tahsildar) and private respondents. They submitted an application (Exhibit‑5) for a temporary injunction but failed to join …
The applicant, Laxman More, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and offences under the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act for allegedly shooting Devidas, the brother of a complainant, with a pistol. The prosecution presented a prima facie case showing the applicant's use …
The petitioners, a public trust, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the Deputy Charity Commissioner’s rejection of their application for provisional acceptance of Change Report No.436 of 2024 and the Joint Charity Commissioner’s dismissal of their revision. They argued that the previous managing …
The petition was filed by the father of a 34‑year‑old woman with moderate intellectual disability who was sexually assaulted and is pregnant at 28 weeks. The petitioner sought an emergency medical board and permission for termination of pregnancy beyond the 24‑week limit, along with preservation of …
The appellants Bhimrao Madhavrao Kute and others filed a criminal appeal challenging the trial court's judgment in Crime No. 119/2026, which involved offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. During the hearing, counsel …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking the Court's permission to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased Gorakh Rangnath Ghogare, who died on 27 February 2026. The Court considered the submissions and the necessity of allowing the representation of the deceased for …
The appellant, Dhiraj Ravindra Fugare, filed a criminal application seeking suspension of his sentence and grant of bail. Counsel for the appellant indicated readiness to proceed, but the application was subsequently withdrawn. The court therefore disposed of the application as withdrawn. The appeal …
The applicant, a landowner whose land was compulsorily acquired, sought enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, alleging the reference court had awarded inadequate compensation. In the first appeal filed by the acquiring body, the applicant needed to file a …
The applicant, Amol Ramrao Nelwade, through his next friend, sought permission to withdraw the compensation amount that had been awarded by a tribunal and deposited by HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. The High Court examined the competing interests of the parties and the need to balance them. It …
The petitioner, Syed Khaja Miyan Syed Baba Miyan, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, in both the morning and subsequent sessions of the hearing. The court inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the writ petition. Consequently, the court exercised its …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a matter, but the court found that the petition could not proceed because the cause of action had become time-barred. The learned advocate for the petitioners argued that the petition did not survive due to the efflux of time. The court agreed, …
The petitioner, Prabhakar Dhondopant Choudhary, filed Contempt Petition No. 285 of 2014 arising out of Writ Petition No. 8725 of 2012 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition alleged that a contempt order had been passed against the respondent and sought appropriate relief. The …
The insurance company appealed against the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited the full amount as ordered by the court. The applicants filed a civil application seeking to withdraw a portion of the deposited compensation pending the appeal. The court, after noting that the tribunal had …
The applicant, Rahul Ramraje Maketedar, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. He later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented in the proceedings. The learned counsel for the …
Petitioner Nilkantha Prabhakar Wagle filed a contempt petition (No. 548 of 2019) against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner had passed away and that his legal representative wished to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioners challenged the orders of the Additional Collector and the Tahsildar that allowed respondents to file an application under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906 for completing a road. The petitioners argued that the application was not for removal of an obstruction of a …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a conviction of Nilkantrao Apparão Patil, and a subsequent order dated 24‑08‑2026 was issued by the Bombay High Court. The respondent’s counsel, Mr. S.V. Mundhe, moved the court to correct the minutes of that order, pointing out that the words ‘under section 28 of …
The matter involved a second appeal (No. 206 of 1999) filed by Sitabai Santosh Mali and others against Dayaram Deolal Mali, along with several related civil applications (Nos. 11948 of 2021, 1789 of 2020, and 6417 of 2026). The appellants were represented by Mr. A. P. Bhandari, while the respondents …
Shraddha Rajendra Mokase filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11911/2025, 12201/2024, 12896/2024, 14090/2024, 10487/2024, 11117/2024, 11972/2025) against the State of Maharashtra and multiple respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates. The bench observed that …
The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Madhav Wankhede, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of this application, the charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application so that a …
The applicant, Bhika Dangal Patil, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body. The applicant relied on a prior order of the same court dated 18 July 2026, which was not contested. The father of the applicant, who was the original claimant, …
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking leave to withdraw the balance of money deposited with the Court during the pendency of their appeals. The appeals had been disposed on 20 April 2026, and the Court had previously allowed withdrawal of 50% of the deposited amount upon an …
The petitioners, Sanjaykumar Babasaheb Sathe and others, filed a writ petition. Their counsel later informed the court that the matter had become infructuous. The respondent, Mrs. Manisha Sanjaykumar Sathe, was represented by counsel. The court, upon hearing that the petition was no longer viable, …
The Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust, Shirdi, through its CEO, filed a civil application seeking a court order to implement Resolution No. 139 dated 27.02.2025, which authorizes laying a 900‑mm diameter pipeline from the Godavari Right Canal to a new storage tank at Nimgaon Korhale, at an estimated …
The petitioner, Sudam Sampatrao Wagh, appealed against Order No. 48 of 2023 which involved a remand. After the impugned order, the underlying suit was decided on 13 January 2026, as evidenced by a copy of the judgment tendered. Because the suit had been finally decided, the appeal became …
The petitioners challenged a 2010 order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal that set aside a tenancy declaration made by the Additional Tahsildar and Deputy Collector regarding agricultural land in Parbhani. The petitioners claimed lawful possession as a tenant since 1955, supported by oral evidence …
The petitioners Vijay Ankushrao Ghodke and others filed Contempt Petition No. 316 of 2020 in WP/4941/2020 against Prerana Deshbharatar and others before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition alleged that a prior order of contempt had not been complied with. On behalf of the …
The petitioners, Rizawana Begum Sharif Pathan and others, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had suppressed facts concerning the disbursement of a certain amount. The petitioners contended that this alleged suppression amounted to contempt of court. The learned counsel for the …
The applicants filed a review application against the High Court's order dismissing their second appeal in a possession suit concerning encroached agricultural land. They argued that the General Power of Attorney holder for Respondent No.2 died during the pendency of the appeal, and that the Court …
Santosh Dnyanoba Machave filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a directive that the State of Maharashtra, through its respondent No.4, decide on a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 12 March 2026. The petitioner alleged that the proposal had not been …
Amol Wilson Umbare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a directive that Respondent No.4 consider his proposal dated 12 March 2026. The petitioner alleged that the proposal had not been acted upon and requested the Court to order a decision on its merits. The Court examined …
Ramrao Wamanrao Deshmukh appealed the 2012 award of the Joint Civil Judge concerning the acquisition of 2 ha 41 R of land for a village tank. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs 854 per R, but the reference court, using a sale of 47 R from a neighboring village at Rs 3213 per R, …
The petitioners, Anil Eknath Kolhe and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 355 of 2020) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition alleged non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioners, through counsel Akash E. Madne and A. B. Kale, informed the court that …
Shri Mohan Mangu Rathod applied to the High Court seeking permission to withdraw a portion of the amount deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to an award of the Reference Court that granted compensation for the loss of over 354 lemon trees. The Reference Court had awarded compensation exceeding …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The appellants challenged a 2019 award by the Reference Court that granted only a 40% enhancement of compensation for their house property acquired for the Lendi project, despite a private valuer’s report valuing the property at Rs.10,22,503. They argued that the court should accept the private …
The High Court considered the bail application of Jalamsing Soma Padvi, accused of murdering Laxmi Vasave under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution’s case is largely circumstantial but includes frequent telephonic contact between the …
Shadul Nazir Shaikh applied for bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration, filing a successive bail application after the trial had commenced. The applicant argued that only three of the eighteen scheduled witnesses had been examined and the trial was proceeding slowly. The prosecution indicated …
The petitioner, Triambak Kisan Randhavane, filed a writ petition challenging a matter that was concurrently pending in a regular civil suit (No. 883/2012) before the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Rahata. During the pendency of the writ petition, the civil suit was disposed of on 28 August …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the enhancement of compensation awarded to claimants for lands acquired for earthquake rehabilitation in villages Pethsangavi and Holi, while the claimants appealed seeking further enhancement. The reference court had increased the market value of the lands …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
Petitioner No.8 died on 28-10-2024 and a civil application was filed to bring his legal representatives on record. Although the application was filed after a delay, the respondents did not oppose it. The court considered the pending petitions and the fact that other petitioners were also contesting …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The applicant-wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to transfer Petition No. A‑405 of 2025 from the Family Court at Amravati to the Family Court at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, alleging that the 300 km distance would cause financial hardship. She relied on a …
The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The …
The petition was filed by Maharashtra Rajya Sahkari Adiwasi Vikas Mahamandal through its President against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' association is located in Nagpur, as indicated by the endorsement of the board. The Court observed that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of …
The petitioner, a wife, filed a private criminal complaint alleging misappropriation of her stridhan and sought to have the regular bail granted to her brother‑in‑law (respondent No.1) cancelled. The trial court had admitted the accused after a long period of absence and imposed bail with …
The applicants sought condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing their first appeal, a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, and permission to withdraw a portion of the amount they had deposited in the court. The court, after hearing counsel, condoned the delay in the interest of …
The applicants filed a first appeal 30 days late and sought condonation of the delay, a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, and permission to withdraw the amount they had deposited with the court. The court, after hearing counsel, condoned the delay, ordered a stay of the judgment …
The appellant Jalna Merchants Co‑Op Bank Ltd. appealed an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent, Rameshwar Dnyaneshwar Misal, through counsel, sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The High Court of Bombay noted that on March 13, 2024 the counsel for the appellants, M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Enterprises and others, informed the Court that he had no instructions in the matter. Subsequent attempts to serve notice on the appellants failed because the address of Appellant No. 1 was no …
The appellant, deceased Sampada Gunwant Suryawanshi, suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident caused by a vehicle owned by Respondent No.2, driven by Respondent No.1 and insured by Respondent No.3. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.2,00,000 in compensation, although it found the …
The petitioner filed a contempt petition challenging an interlocutory order that had already been disposed of by the District Judge. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the subject matter of the contempt petition had become infructuous. Moreover, the underlying writ petition …
The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. concerning motor accident claim petitions. The insurer had accepted the awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and filed withdrawal pursis along with …
The Special Lok Adalat of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against various claimants in motor accident claim matters. The insurer sought condonation of delay in filing the appeals and submitted withdrawal letters authorising …
The Thorat family members appealed against a judgment that had enhanced their compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra to Rs.1,050 per R, based on an average of two sale values. They argued that the higher market value evidenced by a sale at Rs.2,142 per R should be the basis for …
The appellant, Lala Ranjan Bhosale, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending his appeal. The prosecution narrated that Bhosale stabbed the deceased with a knife during a quarrel at a village function, …
The petitioners, owners of several beer bars and permit rooms, filed writ petitions challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. They argued that the denial was arbitrary. The State contended that the petitions were no longer viable due to the lapse of time and subsequent …
A series of writ petitions (WP 5478/19 to WP 5487/19) were filed by various beer bar proprietors seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents concerning the grant of licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy …
Shubham Santosh Jawane appealed for bail in a criminal case (C.R. No. 212/2026) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, including false promise of marriage and forcible sexual relations. The FIR alleged that the appellant had …
The applicant filed a criminal application seeking to amend a pending criminal revision. The court noted that the required amendments to the revision had already been carried out. Consequently, there was no further ground to entertain the amendment application. The applicant also waived service of …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through its authorized signatory, filed a withdrawal petition for its first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar (Motor Accident Claim Petition No.57 of 2005). The Special Lok Adalat condoned the delay in filing the appeal and …
A series of writ petitions (WP 5478/19 to WP 5487/19) were filed by various proprietors of beer bars and permit rooms in Maharashtra challenging the grant of licences. The petitioners argued that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy rendered their petitions ineffective. The …
A group of beer bar proprietors filed multiple writ petitions (WP 5478/19 & Ors.) challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant or renew licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent policy changes rendered their petitions ineffective. The Court examined …
The six applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 220/2026) under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that they were implicated in an incident that resulted in grievous injuries to a victim. The FIR described a violent assault, but the …
Jyoti, the petitioner, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 891 of 2019 against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel returned the brief, and the petitioner failed to engage new representation. Respondent No. 8’s counsel alleged that the petitioner was not serious …
Several proprietors of beer bars and permit rooms filed writ petitions (Nos. 5504‑5511 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in the law regarding liquor …
Several beer bar proprietors filed writ petitions (WP 5478/19 & Ors.) in the Bombay High Court challenging the denial or conditions of their liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in licensing policy rendered their petitions ineffective. The State …
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Pune filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 68‑day delay in filing an income‑tax appeal. The applicant's counsel argued that the filing occurred during a vacation period and the actual delay was only 49 days. The respondent, Shri Chhatrapati …
Vishnu @ Tukya Haridas Dake filed a criminal writ petition seeking release on furlough. No counsel appeared for him. The court noted that his criminal appeal (No. 386 of 2022) had been allowed and he was acquitted on 27 February 2024. Since the conviction no longer existed, the petition had no …
The petitioner, Kisan Dnyanoday Mandal Gudhes Dr. Uttamrao Mahajan Institute of Engineering, filed a contempt petition seeking approval for conducting an engineering course. The petition alleged that the respondents, including the Union of India, had failed to grant the required approval. During the …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates. The Court noted that the matters raised are directly covered by its earlier decision in Writ Petition …
The applicant, Omkar Chavan, sought regular bail for offences under Sections 109(1), 351(2), 352, 189(2), 189(4), 190, 191(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, arising from a February 2026 incident involving a knife (katti). Although his name does not appear in the FIR, a …
Shraddha Rajendra Mokase filed several writ petitions and civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates, despite adjournments. The …
Petitioner Kiran Nimab Baviskar filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to add Lalchand Patil as an accused in C.R. No. 675 of 2022 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhule. The court noted that a charge sheet has already been filed and the trial is underway. It held that any …
The petitioner, Anilkumar, filed a contempt petition (No. 282 of 2009) arising out of a writ petition concerning admission to the fourth year of an engineering course. The petition was filed against the Registrar of North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon and others. The Court observed that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Ananda Chaudhari, accused of offences under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS, relating to the alleged strangulation and disposal of Nilesh's body. The prosecution presented circumstantial evidence, an extrajudicial confession to a …
Priyanka Sandeep Rathod applied for anticipatory bail after being charged under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly pushing her husband from a balcony. The husband alleged she attempted to kill him, while the applicant claimed he was drunk, jumped on his own, and that she had …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2008 award that enhanced compensation and granted statutory benefits to Baburao Pandurang Pawar under the Land Acquisition Act. The State argued that the enhancement lacked material support, the comparable sale used was inappropriate, and the statutory benefits …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard three bail applications filed by Mandar Mukund Karambelkar in criminal matters. After hearing counsel for the applicants and the State, the court noted that the applicants in Bail Applications No.1104/2026 and No.1160/2026 chose to withdraw their …
The petitioner, Yashvant Harikurshanarao Kulkarni, filed writ petition No. 8172 of 2017 arising out of civil suit R.C.S. No.20 of 2010. The court noted that the civil suit had already been disposed on 16 August 2017. Since the underlying suit was concluded, the petition had no surviving cause of …
The petitioner, Rajesh Rameshwar Somani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent. The petition was filed while a related original suit was still pending. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the original suit had …
The New India Assurance Company Limited filed a first appeal (No. 2993 of 2013) before the Special Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad, challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in a 2005 motor accident claim. The appellant submitted a withdrawal pursis …
The petitioner, Anil Ambadas Tandale, filed a contempt petition seeking a fresh advertisement for the post of Kotwal in Ghogargaon village. The court ordered the respondent authority to issue the advertisement. The respondent filed an affidavit showing that a process for appointment had already been …
Petitioner Dinkar Manikrao Ingole filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a directive that Respondent No.2 decide on the petitioner's representation dated 30 January 2026. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to consider the representation on …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard Contempt Petition No. 325 of 2012 arising out of Writ Petition No. 9327 of 2011 filed by Gyanba Kishanrao Deshmukh and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court had earlier directed the parties to decide an application under Section 28A of …
The appellants, charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Arms Act, sought bail in connection with CR No. 481/2025 relating to an alleged assault on 24 August 2025. The prosecution alleged that the appellants …
The applicant, Rajendra Mahadu Gavali, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 0177/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and causing grievous hurt. The FIR alleged that the applicant and co‑accused assaulted an …
Smt. Jubedabi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. She later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition, contending that an alternate legal remedy was available to her. The Court examined whether it could allow the withdrawal and grant her …
A contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 333 of 2019) was filed by Ashok Laxman Bari and others against Somnath Sakharari Adhav and others in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners submitted a written communication dated 11 September 2026 requesting the withdrawal of the …
The petitioner challenged the order of the District Co-operative Election Officer that rejected his objection to the nomination of Respondent No.3 as a delegate of a member society in the District Central Co-operative Bank election. The objection was based on the claim that the respondent was a …
The petitioners, a charitable society, challenged three orders dated 1 May, 27 May and 2 June 2026 that cancelled their agreement with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and directed them to surrender possession of washrooms to the Divisional Controller. The High Court noted a similar …
The original claimants Vishwas Trambak Jadhav and Indubai Pandurang Chauthe died before the filing of the first appeal by the acquiring body. Their legal representatives applied to the High Court seeking permission to amend the title clause of the appeal memorandum and any related applications to …
The petitioners challenged an order of the District Co‑operative Election Officer refusing to include their newly nominated representative in the provisional voters list for the Parbhani District Central Co‑operative Bank election. The earlier delegate had been deleted from the list because he was a …
The acquiring body, after a judgment awarding compensation for land acquisition, deposited 75% of the award amount as directed by the High Court. The original claimants applied to withdraw the deposited amount, arguing that the award was justified and that they needed the funds for livelihood. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (WP No. 4394 of 2006) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. Subsequently, the petitioners, through their counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the writ petition, submitting a written …
The State of Maharashtra, through Karjat Police Station, sought leave to appeal the acquittal of Jyoti Narayan Parihar, a Block Education Officer, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrigonda, in a case under Section 306 of the IPC for alleged abetment of the suicide of teacher Jeevan Ramchandra …
The petition filed by Teachers Co‑operative Credit Society Ltd. challenged a Labour Court order that reinstated Pavankumar Mahadeo Choure and awarded back‑wages. The petitioner raised three objections: lack of jurisdiction of the Labour Court because the dispute allegedly fell under the Maharashtra …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a directive that Respondent No.4 decide a representation dated 13 November 2024. The Court examined whether it could order an administrative authority to adjudicate the representation on its merits within a stipulated period. No substantive legal …
The applicant Venkata Wamanrao Pawar filed a civil application against Rangnath Tukaram Shinde and others. The court, after considering the pleadings, allowed the civil application. Consequently, the court ordered that a first appeal be registered. No further factual or legal discussion was …
The respondent filed a suit to recover possession of a leased plot, which was dismissed, leading to an appeal that was allowed. During the pendency of the appeal, the Central Government acquired the property and gave constructive possession to the appellants. The court ordered the appellants to pay …
Vivek Madhav alias Kaduba Gore (Applicant 1) filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest under FIR CR No.30/2026 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged assault with iron rods and wooden sticks but no evidence of grievous injury by Applicant 1. The State …
The petitioners filed an appeal on 13 January 2025 which remained pending before Respondent No.2, the Committee, beyond the period prescribed by the Government Resolution dated 27 March 2024. That resolution mandates that an appeal must be decided within six months after hearing the parties, taking …
Petitioner Rajendrakumar Kishanlal Jaiswal filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction to register offences under the Cyber Law and the Indian Penal Code against respondents 4 and 5. The police had already recorded three non‑cognizable reports at Badnapur and Kadim Jalna police stations …
The accused, Javed alias Bablu Mehtabsab Bagwan, filed a second bail application in a case involving offences under Sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging delay in the trial. The High Court examined the status report, which showed that the charge was framed on 28‑03‑2024 and several …
Ganesh Hiraman Pimple filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 20.05.2026 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Nanded, and to obtain a direction for police protection of his life and landed property. The Attorney General noted that a civil suit concerning the same matter was …
The High Court of Bombay dismissed a series of first appeals filed by the Executive Engineer (Acquiring Body) challenging various judgments and awards of the Land Acquisition Reference Court concerning land taken for the Sina‑Kolegaon Medium Project. The appellant argued that the earlier judgments …
Ramprasad Kisanrao Thorat filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Divisional Commissioner and other respondents regarding his representations dated 2 June 2026 and 8 June 2026. The petitioner sought a directive for the respondents to …
The petitioner, Bhiku Sopan Patil, alleged that his land was taken in 1998 and that a compensation award was passed on 25 May 2022, but no compensation had been paid to date. He filed a representation with the Sub-Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) on 22 April 2025, which remained undecided. The …
Haribhai Laxman Bharti claimed that his land was taken in 2004 and an award for compensation was passed on 15 December 2022, but no compensation had been paid. He filed a representation with the Sub-Divisional Officer on 22 April 2025, which remained pending. The petitioner approached the High Court …
Nirmalabai Sunil Bhangare filed a writ petition (No. 6608 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector, Latur and others. The petitioner sought relief but the court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred since the cause of action …
The City and Industrial Corporation (CIDCO) filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 58‑day delay in filing its first appeal, arguing the delay was due to necessary administrative procedures. The court, after hearing opposition from the claimants and the Attorney General, condoned the …
Petitioners Dattatray Hanmantrao Khandare and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were represented by Smt. Surekha G. Chincholkar, while the respondents were represented by Mr. S. …
The applicant filed Civil Application No. 8655 seeking condonation of a 112‑day delay in filing a second appeal against a decree for possession of a mortgaged property. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found them neither deliberate nor intentional, granting condonation in the …
The petitioner, Shivaji Shaikshanik Pratishthan Vivekanand Institute Of Technology, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tukaram Narayan Kini, who was arrested for alleged sexual assault of a 13‑year‑old deaf‑and‑dumb girl in Latur. The prosecution presented the victim’s recorded statement, an injury certificate, a disability certificate, and corroborative …
Vijay Venkatrao Patil filed a writ petition (No. 10269 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petition was presented by Ms. Shradha Patil on behalf of Mr. P.C. Bhagure, while the State was represented by Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP, and …
Shubham Dattatray Hajare applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 344/2026, alleged to involve offences under Sections 123, 223, 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State sought additional time to produce investigation papers, marking the fourth such request, and the …
The petitioners, all holders of M.Phil degrees and recipients of fellowships from BARTI or BANRF, filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a direction to the university to constitute a Research Recommendation Committee and to admit them to the Ph.D. programme without undergoing the prescribed …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, filed a complaint alleging that the accused Gram Sevak demanded a bribe of Rs 51,000 to issue a completion resolution for a construction bill of about Rs 7‑8 lakh. The ACB conducted a trap operation with a pancha, leading to the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kaduba Sonwane, filed a writ petition seeking a validity certificate confirming his belonging to the Scheduled Tribe 'Koli Malhar'. He relied on a prior order in Writ Petition No. 6154/2026 (Swapnil Rajiv Sonwane v. State of Maharashtra) where the court had directed a …
The appellant filed a Family Court Appeal seeking relief, but the parties subsequently settled their dispute and obtained a divorce by mutual consent. The appellant's counsel, on instructions, moved the court to withdraw the appeal. The court, noting the amicable settlement and the mutual consent …
Varsha Aakash Kamble, the wife, filed an application seeking the transfer of her pending Hindu Marriage Petition (No. A-51 of 2025) from the Family Court in Latur to the Family Court in Nanded. The court noted that the non‑applicant failed to appear despite multiple notices. After hearing the …
The applicants, Ramkisan Balasaheb Patil and others, filed a civil application seeking restoration of a writ petition (WP/676/2020) that had been dismissed in default because they failed to remove office objections within the two‑week period ordered on 24‑03‑2026. The application was filed 60 days …
The appellant, convicted under Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for penetrative sexual assault on a six‑year‑old girl, appealed the Sessions Court judgment. The appellant challenged the victim's age, the authenticity of the birth certificate, the …
Petitioner Sandeep Dhondiba More challenged his detention order dated 09.02.2026 issued by the District Magistrate, Nanded, under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug‑Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons …
The appellant, Dattatray Murlidhar Deshmukh, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing, the court indicated it would not grant any relief. Consequently, the appellant's counsel, on instructions, withdrew the appeal. The court dismissed the appeal as …
The wife filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking transfer of a restitution of conjugal rights petition from the Family Court in Aurangabad to the Family Court in Dhule, citing a 175‑km distance, financial constraints and lack of accompaniment. She also noted three criminal proceedings …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief against the respondents. During the hearing, the respondents informed the court that the original plaintiff was prepared to add the Wakf Board as a party-defendant in the related civil suits. The court accepted this statement as a binding …
The petitioner, Imran Abdul Tamboli, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a notice dated 18 May 2023 issued by Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar, which demanded production of documents in response to a complaint by Rajendra Punjaji Pagar. The petitioner argued that the notice was unlawful, …
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway (the acquiring body), filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay of 996 days and 401 days in preferring its appeals against the respondents. The respondents did not contest the applications and no malafide intent was shown by the applicant. The …
The petitioner, Navkar Goshala Panjarpole Sanstha, a cow shelter, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 13 August 2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, which set aside a lower court order granting interim custody of seized bullocks to respondent No.2, the owner of …
Ankush Rangnath Kale filed a writ petition challenging the order that upheld the rejection of his nomination in the election of a sugar cooperative (Karkhana). The Returning Officer had rejected his nomination on the ground that he failed to comply with the society’s bye‑law clause 26(1)(E)(4) and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (901 WRIT PETITION NO. 12140 OF 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the underlying civil suit was fully disposed of. The petitioner's counsel submitted that, with the suit concluded, there was no remaining …
The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 908 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. After filing, the petitioner failed to take any further steps in the proceedings after 1 August 2019 and remained absent …
The petitioner, Ramnath Gahininath Golhar, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his nomination by the Returning Officer, who found him non‑compliant with Clause 26(1)(F)(1) of the Sugar Industry Bye‑laws requiring a candidate to have supplied sugarcane for at least three of the …
The petitioners, M.A. Quadeer Siddiqui and others, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 321 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra. After filing, the petitioners failed to appear before the court and did not take any further steps, including no circulation of the petition after 27 …
The applicant's land was compulsorily acquired and he received compensation that he deemed inadequate. He approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. The acquiring body, aggrieved by the enhancement, filed a first appeal and deposited …
The applicant's land was compulsorily acquired and compensation was awarded. The applicant approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement, which was granted. The acquiring body, aggrieved by the enhanced award, filed a first appeal and deposited the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 9655 of 2015) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Subhash V. Mundhe, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The court accepted the request for withdrawal. …
The petitioners filed an application seeking restoration of an appeal that had been dismissed because the appellant had failed to remove the court’s office objections. The application was filed 73 days after the dismissal, a delay the court examined to determine whether it was intentional. The court …
