Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 4401–4600

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, XYZ, filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to Respondent No.2, who was charged with offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 376(3) and 506 of the IPC and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The bail order imposed a condition that the accused not contact the victim …

SUKHDEV SAKHARAM BHAVLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Sukhdev Sakharam Bhavle, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. N.R. Thorat, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, …

POOJA GAURAV JAISWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Pooja Gaurav Jaiswal filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation of Crime No.251/2026 and a disciplinary enquiry against Respondent No.4. The respondent State filed an application indicating that a ‘B’ summary report had been filed on 08.08.2026. The Court held …

AJINATH DAGDU AVHAD AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Ajinath Dagdu Avhad and others filed Contempt Petition No. 332 of 2012 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising out of Writ Petition (Civil) No. 10672 of 2010 against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought relief on the ground that a prior order of contempt had not been complied …

KIRAN PRAKASH JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kiran Prakash Jadhav, filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking enforcement of an earlier order directing the closure of unauthorized schools. The court had ordered that such schools not be allowed to operate from the academic year 2013‑2014 based on a …

RAJENDRA @ RAJU JIVANLAL BAMBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajendra Jivanlal Bamb, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Maharashtra order the clubbing of all FIRs of similar nature registered against him in Dhule district and conduct a common investigation by a single police agency. The Court noted that three …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KKVM THR MID, OSMANABAD AND ORSversusPANDIT KALYAN GIRI

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant's land was compulsorily acquired and he received compensation that he deemed inadequate. He approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. The acquiring body, dissatisfied with the enhancement, filed a first appeal and …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KKVM THR MID, OSMANABAD AND ORSversusPANDIT KALYAN GIRI

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The land of Pandit Kalyan Giri was compulsorily acquired by the State of Maharashtra and compensation was awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. The applicant approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. The acquiring body, aggrieved …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPOPAT NANABHAU UGHADE DIED THR HIS LRS LATA AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2011 award of compensation in a land acquisition matter involving Popat Nanabhau Ughade and others, challenging the enhancement of compensation and certain statutory benefits. The State argued that the Reference Court had erred in raising the market value and in …

SUNIL BHAUSING RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and his father over a land dispute. The FIR alleged that Sunil Bhausing Rathod assaulted the informant with an axe, causing a grievous head injury, while …

SHANKAR FAKIRA GAIKWAD AND ORSversusBABAN GOVIND CHOURE AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Chhaya Shankar Gaikwad died in a motor vehicle accident and her dependents filed a claim for compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but omitted amounts for loss of future prospects and loss of consortium. On appeal, the High Court applied Supreme Court precedents …

DADARAO RAMA CHAVAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their representation dated 12 April 2018, seeking rental compensation under Government Circulars of 1 December 1972 and 2 April 1979, had not been decided by Respondent No.2. The Court examined whether the administrative authority was obligated to …

BHAGWAT SARJERAO SHIRSAT AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their representation dated 2 April 2018, seeking rental compensation under Government Circulars of 1 December 1972 and 2 April 1979, had not been decided by Respondent No.2. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to decide the …

DINKAR SHANKAR DESHPANDEversusSANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed three contempt petitions (Nos. 305, 306, 307 of 2014) alleging that the respondents, Sanjay Kumar and others, had failed to comply with a prior contempt order. The State, through its Additional Government Pleaders, filed affidavits stating that the contempt order had been fully …

PADMINBAI LALASAHEB HANDE AND ANOTHERversusMADHAV BABASAHEB HANDE

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Padminbai Lalasaheb Hande & others filed a writ petition in 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for an extended period. On 1 September 2026, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the passage of time rendered the petition infructuous. The …

RAHIL SIDDIQUI SHAKEEL SIDDIQUIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 98 of 2026, alleging that the FIR alleging assault on an informant was false and that the evidence, including CCTV footage and medical reports, did not implicate them. The prosecution argued that the accused were part of an …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The appellant, X.Y.Z., filed a complaint alleging that on 5 June 2016 the accused entered her home, assaulted her mother with an iron rod, pressed her breast, tore her clothes and threatened them. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution evidence unreliable. On appeal, the High …

LAXMIBAI TRIMBAK KHARATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The petitioners, members of the Kharat family, filed a series of civil applications seeking to bring legal representatives of a deceased claimant on record and to challenge earlier judgments and awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition proceedings. They argued that the Reference …

KACHRU NARAYAN KHARATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay heard a group of first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings involving several members of the Kharat family and the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that earlier judgments and awards of the Reference Court had been set aside and the matters were remitted for …

GIRJABAI NAMDEO CHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Girjabai Namdeo Chate, filed a writ petition (3-WP-6874-2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time, raising the question of its viability. The petitioner’s …

Harshada Aakash DhawareversusAakash Kanu Dhaware

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The wife filed an application seeking transfer of the husband’s divorce petition from the Family Court in Dharashiv to the Civil Judge Senior Division in Kallam, where she resides. The husband lives in Pohner, about 5-6 km from Dharashiv, while Kallam is roughly 60 km away. A pending case under the …

VAIJANATH VENKATRAO JADHAVversusSUBHASH RAMRAO JADHAV AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant filed Special Civil Suit No.146 of 2023 seeking specific performance of a sale agreement and a perpetual injunction. The respondents contended that the plaintiff had earlier instituted Regular Civil Suit No.265 of 2021 on the same transaction, and therefore the later suit was barred by …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusNOORJAHABEE NISSARKHA PATHAN AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The dispute between New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (appellant) and Noorjahabee Nissarkha Pathan & Ors. (respondents) was referred to the National Lok Adalat. The appellant filed a withdrawal petition, accompanied by an authority letter, to withdraw its appeal. The Lok Adalat accepted the withdrawal, …

SHAFIQ NOORAHMED SHAIKH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shafiq Noorahmed Shaikh and his co‑accused Azhar Shamshoddin Shaikh were charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for alleged assault, use of an iron rod and alleged caste‑based abuse during a road‑rage …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusKUNDLIK GYANBA (DIED) CPS (1) AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑2, Ambajogai, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired for a percolation tank. The land, 1 hectare 47 roods, was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act with a notification in 1996 and an award in 1999 at Rs.245 per …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusKUNDLIK GYANBA (DIED) CPS (1) AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑2, Ambajogai, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired for a percolation tank. The land, acquired under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894, was initially compensated at Rs 245 per rupee and the claimants sought …

SARASWATIBAI HARISHCHANDRA HALBURGKARversusSURAJ PRATAP JAISWAL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Saraswatibai, filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 20 October 2020 directing the respondent, an education officer, to issue a simple notice for granting her a family pension. The court observed that the petitioner had not taken any steps to circulate the …

SANTOSH RAVINDRA PANCHAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Santosh Ravindra Panchal and others, filed a contempt petition seeking payment of consequential benefits after being approved for appointment from non‑aided to aided posts. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and they did not prosecute the petition. The court observed …

SUBHASH S/O. GUNWANTRAO DHAKAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Subhash, filed a criminal application and a revision seeking relief, alleging that the proceedings had become infructuous due to the passage of time after the charge was framed and evidence commenced. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the delay rendered the …

KISHANLAL SO SHIVLAL JAISWALversusSAMPATRAJ SOKUNDANMAL JAIN

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed Civil Application No. 10585 of 2009 seeking to fix a second appeal for final hearing. The court noted that the application was originally filed in 2009 and therefore considered it already disposed. No steps had been taken against the deceased respondent, leading the court to …

BALAJI DHONDIRAM GAVANE AND ANOTHERversusANNUSAYA VAYANKAT GAVANE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Balaji Dhondiram Gavhane and another, sought restoration of their writ petition (No. 1917/2026) after it was dismissed for failure to bring on record the legal heirs of Defendant No. 4, Raosaheb Pundalik Gavane. The dismissal was based on a deadline set by the court, which the …

NAMDEV ALIAS HANUMAN RAMBHAU PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Namdev alias Hanuman Rambhau Pawar, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The State argued that the trial was already underway with six witnesses examined and a seventh summoned, and that the remaining twenty-one witnesses required the trial to be …

SEEMA BABRUWAN RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Seema Babruwan Rathod and others, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 109(1), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 49 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an alleged assault on an informant and a witness on 28‑05‑2026. The …

RAJU S/O. BHAGWAT SURYAWANSHI AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, noting that many petitions required amendment, extended the time for filing such amendments by four weeks from the date of the order, granting …

SANDIP EKNATH DHANGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Sandip Eknath Dhangar was convicted under Section 498-A of the IPC by the trial court while co‑accused were acquitted. He appealed, contending that the prosecution failed to prove any mental or physical cruelty and that the conviction was based on assumptions and material omissions in witness …

HIGH SCHOOL LOHARA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHERversusV.K. KHNADKE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard Contempt Petition No. 477 of 2013 filed by High School Lohara through its Secretary against V. K. Khnadke and others. The petitioners, represented by Adv. Yashraj H. Gaherwar on behalf of Adv. Gunale V. D., sought relief alleging contempt. During the …

SAKHARAM UMAJI KAMBLE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

In a bail application (No. 1199 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, the applicants Sakharam Umaji Kamble and Shriram Balasaheb Pande sought a correction to the court's order dated 22 September 2026. Their counsel pointed out that the order mistakenly referred to "Crime No.345 of …

DILIP VINAYAK THORAT AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Dilip Vinayak Thorat and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioners were represented by Advocate S.B. Kakde, while the State was represented by Advocate Saie …

KHAN MINHAJ ABDUL JALEEL KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Khan Minhaj Abdul Jaleel Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 0169 of 2026, alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the applicant's brother and …

BHAGYASHRI SACHIN KADAMversusSACHIN UMAKANT KADAM

Withdrawn

The applicant, Bhagyeshri Sachin Kadam, filed a miscellaneous civil application and subsequently sought leave from the court to withdraw the same. The learned counsel, Mrs. Madhaveshwari Mhase, made the request. The bench, presided over by Justice Rohit W. Joshi, considered the request and granted …

Bharti Nikhil Sonawane @ Bharti Ashok SalveversusNikhil Dadarao Sonawane

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Bharti Nikhil Sonawane, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On 5 August 2026, the applicant's counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The court directed the counsel to obtain instructions from the …

PRIYANKA ONKAR YENDHEversusONKAR RAVINDRA YENDHE

DISPOSED OFF

Priyanka Onkar Yendhe applied to transfer her divorce suit (HMP No. 286/2025) from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Junnar to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Newasa. She asserted that she has no income and cannot travel the 170 km to Junnar, and that related proceedings under the Domestic …

VITTHAL BHAUSAHEB DIWTE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, four members of the Diwte family, were arrested on 2 June 2026 in connection with Crime No. 195 of 2026 for alleged assault on the father of the informant, Tukaram, during a land‑related dispute. The FIR alleges that the accused kicked and struck Tukaram, who had a prior brain …

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusRANJANA BHAUSAHEB KAKADE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

In a National Lok Adalat proceeding, Reliance General Insurance Co. appealed against claimants Ranjana Bhausaheb Kakade and others. The parties, represented by advocates Mr. Dahat and Mr. Mayure, presented a settlement agreement (Exhibit X) along with supporting documents. The Lok Adalat approved …

THE STATE OF MAH and ORSversusMURLIDHAR RAMA GORE and ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the VI Adhoc Additional District Judge, Beed, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired in 1989 for a percolation tank. The claimants had originally received meager compensation of Rs.72 per ropani for land and Rs.2 for potkharab land and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBALU S/O. LIMBAJI SANAP

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of a talathi accused of demanding a bribe of Rs.1,500 for a land mutation. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the complainant (PW1) who claimed the accused demanded money orally, and a shadow …

MANISH MANEUL ABBASIversusTHE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Manish Maneul Abbasi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector, Jalna. The petition was heard by Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasahab D. Shinde. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the second respondent to decide the …

MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEYversusTHE STATE OF MAH and ANR

DISMISSED

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation appealed the award of compensation dated 18 June 1994 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.26/1992, 341/1993 and 266/1992, alleging that the award exceeded four times the compensation fixed by the State Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO). The …

MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEYversusTHE STATE OF MAH and ANR

DISMISSED

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation appealed the award of compensation dated 18 June 1994 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.26/1992, 341/1993 and 266/1992, alleging that the award exceeded four times the compensation fixed by the State Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO). The …

AMAN KHAN USMAN KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Aman Khan filed Contempt Petition No. 417 of 2013 arising out of WP/4582/2012, alleging that the order passed in the earlier proceeding had not been complied with. The petitioner was represented by Advocate S. S. Khoche on behalf of Mr. Palodkar Deodatt P. The State of Maharashtra was represented by …

HARIRAM BABURAO KANJEversusMANISHA HARIRAM KANJE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a marriage petition. The marriage petition was subsequently disposed, rendering the subject matter of the writ petition infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner argued that with the disposal of the marriage petition, there was nothing left for the …

KAKASAHEB RADHKISAN KANSEversusAYYAJ NASIRODDIN MOMIN AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants were charged under several offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant and witnesses with iron pipes and a spade on 27 April 2025, causing injuries. The applicants argued that a counter‑report showed the incident was a free fight between two groups, …

HAUSABAI MOHAN THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, members of the Thorat family, challenged a judgment that awarded them Rs.1,050 per R as compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They argued that the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court erred by averaging the market values from two sale …

UTTAM SHAMRAO THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, heirs of the Thorat family, challenged a judgment that had enhanced their compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra to Rs.1,050 per R, whereas they claimed Rs.2,000 per R. They relied on three prior sale deeds (Exhibits 14, 15, 16) showing market values of Rs.2,142, …

KARBHARI SHAMRAO THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, heirs of several deceased landowners, appealed against a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Beed, which had enhanced their compensation for land acquired by the State to Rs.1,050 per R based on an average of two sale values. They argued that the Reference Court erred by averaging the …

MOHAN SHAMRAO THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Thorat family members appealed against a judgment that awarded them Rs.1,050 per R as compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They argued that the reference court erred by averaging the market values of three pre‑notification sale deeds, instead of considering the higher …

RAHUL PRABHAKAR BAGULversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rahul Prabhakar Bagul, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to register a crime against respondents 5 to 13 based on a complaint lodged on 09.02.2022 at Azad Nagar Police Station, Dhule. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. …

APPASAHEB BHAGWAT DHEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Appasaheb Bhagwat Dhere applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, contending that his detention was illegal because the alleged crime had not been established and that a writ petition, not a bail application, was the proper remedy. He argued that no prior grievance or …

ASHOK HEERAMAN SATDIVEversusSTATE OF MAHA

Appeal Abated

The appellant, Ashok Heerman Satdive, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant's counsel submitted information that the appellant had died, corroborated by the appellant's employer. The Court considered whether the …

RAFAT YAR KHAN SAMAD YAR KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered six anticipatory bail applications filed by individuals accused of assaulting an informant under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that 8‑10 persons, including the applicants, …

UJWAL HARIDAS BHOGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, Ujwal Haridas Bhogale, filed an application seeking quashment of FIR No. 422/2022 alleging offences under Sections 376(2)(n) and 417 IPC, claiming that the alleged sexual relationship with a married informant was consensual and based on a false promise of marriage. The State opposed, …

GANESH RAYSING RATHODversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Ganesh Raysing Rathod filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection against arrest in a case instituted by the Superintendent of Police. The applicant was represented by Advocate V. S. Wakale, while the State was represented by Advocate N. …

RAMKUMAR HERGUNIDAS PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …

ANIL ASHOK KUMAR PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the High Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April …

KISHOR ARVIND PURIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (10 April 2026). Petitioners, represented by Ms Rutuja Pawar and Ms Sneha More, …

ANAND PRAFULLCHAND TANDUREversusINCOMET TAX OFFICER WARD - I LATUR AND ORS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in …

RAMKUMAR HERGUNIDAS PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I NANDED AND ORS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance with a Supreme …

ANIL ASHOK KUMAR PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these …

RANSING SATISH MANOHARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I JALNA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …

ANITA SANJAY RANALKARversusSANJAY PURSHOTTAM RANALKAR AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a first appeal against a judgment dated 27 September 2023 under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 concerning custody of a minor child. The appeal was filed 171 days after the judgment, exceeding the prescribed time limit. The court examined the reasons …

PAWAN SURESH KARWAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 …

KISHOR ARVIND PURIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. …

GEETA ELECTRICALS PARTNERSHIP FIRMversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme …

SANJAY RATANSING PATALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Sanjay Patale, was arrested on 3 January 2026 in connection with a murder alleged to have occurred on 30 December 2025, for which he was named as accused No.3 in Crime No. 001 of 2026. The prosecution alleged that the victim died from throttling and that the accused was present at the …

KIRANKUMAR RAMVILAS CHANDAKversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 LATUR AND OTHER

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …

FIROZ HUSEN SHAIKHversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AHMEDNAGAR

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these …

KISHOR ARVIND PURIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I LATUR AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme …

RAMKUMAR HERGUNIDAS PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The transfer was directed in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

J.K. ENTERPRISESversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2 AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …

JIYA PRAKASH PAHUJAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking the Supreme Court's decision in Income Tax Officer, …

KARAN JAYESH GANGARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking the Supreme Court's decision …

MANOJKUMAR GHANSHYAM DHANKANIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 DHULE AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the High Court. The transfer was ordered in compliance with the Supreme Court's judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap …

RATNA SOPAN NARKHEDEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1) JALGAON AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance with a Supreme …

ASHOK TOLARAM KAREDAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 DHULE AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications that were pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a …

SUNILDATT LAXMANDAS POPLIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 DHULE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, …

KIRANKUMAR RAMVILAS CHANDAKversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 LATUR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in …

PRAKASH ARUNRAO SHETEversusINCOMET TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 (5) AURANGABAD AND ORS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance with a Supreme …

TUKARAM VIJAY PAMPATWARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court …

SANJAY SUMANLAL SHAHversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court …

PRADEEP RADHAKISAN YENDHEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSANJAY S/O. MADHAV DALAL

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra sought leave to appeal an acquittal of Sanjay Dalal, an Assistant Manager of Maharashtra State Financial Corporation, by the Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption Court, Aurangabad. The prosecution alleged that Dalal demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs 5,000 (later negotiated to Rs …

SADASHIVRAO VITHALRAO AHERversusS J KOCHE ANDO RS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a contempt petition in 2011 seeking rental compensation ordered under a contempt direction. The respondent Collector filed an affidavit stating that compensation had already been paid under the award of Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, specifically under Sections 23 and …

PRANIT BABASAHEB GUND THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER BABASAHEB AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER, OSMANABAD.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, a minor aged 13 and his father, sought to lease land for a solar‑wind project, agreeing to a 28‑year‑6‑month term with M/s Juniper Company. The District Judge allowed the lease only until the minor attained majority, limiting the project's viability. The appellants appealed, arguing …

SANJAY BALAJI YELGIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, a clerk in the Osmanabad Sub‑Divisional Office, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe to influence a pending case under the Bombay Prohibition Act. The prosecution’s case relied on …

ASHOK WAMANRAO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ashok Wamanrao Patil, filed a contempt petition (No. 359 of 2012) arising from a writ petition (WP/4996/2006) that had been dismissed in default by the Bombay High Court on 18 August 2017. After the dismissal, the petitioner took no steps to circulate the matter or pursue any further …

VINOD BABURAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of three writ petitions (Nos. 16, 18 & 29) that challenged the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a non‑practising allowance, issues previously decided in a common judgment dated 30‑07‑2026 (Writ Petition No. …

SHRIRAM RADHAKISAN FUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Shriram Radhakisan Funde, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (CR No. 265/2026) alleging offences under Sections 143 and 144(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 to 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The FIR was based on a police raid at a lodge …

RAMESH GOVINDRAO MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ramesh Govindrao Mali, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief against Police Inspector Ashok Ghorband, alleging accumulation of disproportionate assets. The petitioner argued that the inspector's transfer from Nanded District rendered his first two prayers moot and requested …

SAJABAI NAKU MANURE AND ANRversusSHEETAL UGALE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Sajabai Naku Manure and others, filed a contempt petition alleging that an order directing their names be added to the beneficiary list of the Indira Awas Yojana had been disobeyed. The Court noted that the Resource Personnel report showed the petitioners had made no effort to …

ASHOK BHAURAO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ashok Bhaurao Patil filed a writ petition seeking a fresh pension proposal from the management of a school under the Zilla Parishad. The petition raised the issue of continuity in service, which the Court noted had already been decided in Writ Petition No.1036 of 2003. The Court directed the …

VIJAY ASARAM GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Narayan Kardile was arrested on 23 April 2026 for alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including hurling a stone at a vehicle and assault with a stick causing simple injuries. The informant, who was the driver of the truck, filed the FIR and later expressed no …

ROHIT ALIAS ROHIDAS DADASAHEB JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, Rohit alias Rohidas Dadasaheb Jadhav, was arrested on 12 February 2023 in connection with a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 201) and filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The prosecution argued that the applicant was the driver of a tractor …

BASHIR MOHDDINSAB SHAIKHversusUMAKANT SHIVRAM DANGE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bashir Mohdinsab Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the respondent, Umakant Shivram Dange. The petitioner sought relief despite the existence of a pending suit. The respondent contended that the trial court had already decided …

SHRADDHA RAJENDRA MOKASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shraddha Rajendra Mokase filed several writ petitions and civil applications against the State of Maharashtra and multiple respondents seeking relief. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates. The court observed that the matters raised were already decided in Writ …

SULOCHANABAI SHESHRAO KHARATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The petitioners, members of the Kharat family, filed several civil applications seeking to bring legal representatives of a deceased claimant on record in land acquisition proceedings. The first appeals arose from earlier judgments and awards of the Reference Court, which the petitioners contended …

BHUJANG CHATRAPATINATH ZAMBREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Bhujang Chatrapatinath Zambre, filed a fourth anticipatory bail application in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences (307, 326, 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149). Earlier bail applications had been rejected on merit, but the parties now claim to have settled the …

AMEYA DEEPAK BHIDE AND OTHERversusSAKSHI AMEYA BHIDE AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Amay Deepak Bhide filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matter involving Sakshi Amay Bhide. While the petition was pending, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shrirampur, passed an order on 14 August 2026 in Criminal M.A. No. 69/2024 that …

GEETA ELECTRICALS PARTNERSHIP FIRMversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …

MILIND BHAVSARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 DHULE

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax …

AKASH ASHOK DARGADversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD LATUR

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking the Supreme …

RUKMABAI LAXMAN KHOKLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rukmabai Laxman Khokle, filed a writ petition challenging a February 2025 order that effected a ‘no‑confidence motion’ against her under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and a subsequent April 2025 order by the District Collector dismissing her appeal. She alleged …

KHEMA APPA KOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petition was a contempt petition filed by Khema Appa Kole against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner sought enforcement of a rental compensation order previously directed by the Court. Respondent No.3 filed an affidavit‑in‑reply stating that the rental compensation claim had …

UMESH BADHUBHAI PATILversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 DHULE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer …

DIPALI DINESH BHAYEKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD N AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought the transfer of all these …

RAHUL KONDIRAM LIMBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rahul Kondiram Limbale, filed a criminal writ petition and subsequently, through his counsel, sought to withdraw the petition in favor of pursuing an alternate remedy under the law. The High Court, after noting the request, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition, …

REKHA W/O. RAJENDRA DOKHE AND ANOTHERversusRAJENDRA S/O. BANSI DHOKE

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant sought to quash a Family Court order directing him to pay maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month to his son until further orders, arguing that the son has attained majority and all arrears have been paid. The respondent opposed, contending that the proper remedy for modification is under …

VISHNU SHESHRAO MOHITEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The transfer was ordered in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. …

SUNIL GANPAT DIGHEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …

MADAN GANGADHAR BIDARKARversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income …

GUNVANT SHIVAJI KOTAKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 DHULE AND OTHERS

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, …