Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 4601–4800
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by …
The petitioner, Smita Khursale, challenged the termination of her services by Mahatma Gandhi Mission, Aurangabad, filing a writ petition against the order dated 31 January 2018. She also sought to overturn an earlier decision of the University and College Tribunal that refused an interim stay of the …
Sangeeta Nandlal Pawar, a headmistress of a private school, was suspended in June 2024 after an FIR under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. She was reinstated in September 2024 after a preliminary enquiry found the charges baseless, but the Education Officer failed to grant …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2009 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from the Kadam family, alleging the enhancement and statutory benefits were unsupported and imposed an undue burden on the exchequer. The respondents produced sale deeds from 1995‑1998 as comparable market …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2009 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from the Kadam family, arguing the increase was unsupported and that statutory benefits were improperly granted. The High Court examined whether the enhancement could be quashed and whether the solatium, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of four respondents charged under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B IPC for the death of Rupali, who died from burns within seven years of her marriage. The prosecution alleged that the respondents repeatedly harassed her for the unpaid dowry of Rs 20,000 and …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the continuation of FIR Nos. 198/2017 and 359/2017, alleging they pertained to the same offence. The State argued that the Economic Offences Wing, Ahmednagar, had taken over the investigation and merely altered the FIR numbers. The Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning income tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, requested that all these matters be transferred to the Principal Seat of the Court in …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. R.U. Gavhane on behalf of Adv. Karhale and Ms. Bhagyashree S., filed three separate contempt petitions (Nos. 329, 330, 332 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw these …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning income tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance with a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation appealed against a reference court judgment that awarded interest on enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Neopur Medium Project. The dispute centered on whether interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act should accrue from the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
M/s Millenium Beer Industries (now United Breweries Ltd.) filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the Union of India, the Central Board of Excise & Customs, and the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax. While the petition was pending, the related Central Excise Appeal …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1) vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The Court directed that the petitioners may amend their petitions to …
In 2012 a contempt petition was filed alleging that the order dated 31 January 2011 in Writ Petition No.295/2011 had not been complied with. The order was subsequently challenged in Letters Patent Appeal No.52/2015, which was decided on 6 July 2015. The appellate decision held that the petitioner, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026. The Court directed that all petitioners who intend to challenge the validity of Section 147-A of the Income Tax Act must file amendments within one …
Shivaji Nagnath Koshti filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Uttam Nagnath Koshti. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. S. Y. Mahajan, sought liberty to withdraw the petition in order to pursue an appropriate remedy under the law. The Court considered whether a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications that were pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax …
The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.34/2022 and the accompanying charge‑sheet alleging abetment of suicide under Sections 306 and 34 IPC and Section 39 of the Maharashtra Money‑Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. The deceased had left a note naming several creditors, including the petitioners, …
The applicant, Dattatraya Kapale, filed a criminal revision seeking relief against the respondent, Yogesh Jaiswal. The trial court had ordered the applicant to deposit a certain amount, which the applicant complied with, and the respondent subsequently withdrew the same amount. The applicant argued …
The appellant, Laxman Deorao Sakalkar, appealed the award of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge concerning compensation for land acquired for the Dhudhana Minor Irrigation Project. He argued that the land was irrigated, citing the Special Land Acquisition Officer's separate compensation for a well and …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation appealed a judgment dated 5 April 2007 that had enhanced compensation awarded to the claimants in a land acquisition matter. The appellants argued that the reference court’s enhancement should not exceed four times the amount awarded by the …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications. The petitioners requested that all these matters be transferred to the Principal Seat of the High Court, relying on a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), …
The Union of India (Central Railway) sought to acquire land in Arvi village for a railway line expansion, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1995. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs 127 per square metre, which the claimants challenged before the reference court; the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications filed by Ravindra Prakash Chand Jethani and others against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning income tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in compliance …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications that were pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the Supreme Court's decision in Income Tax Officer, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Income Tax Officer, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
Shraddha Rajendra Mokase filed several writ petitions and civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear for hearing on the scheduled dates. The Court observed that the matters …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning income tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a …
Petitioner Prakash Murlidhar Mate filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Ashok Sahakari Karkhana Ltd. and others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the dispute had already been settled between the parties. Consequently, there was …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
The appellant, Tulshidas Vasant Khadke, appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought to have the appeal transferred from the High Court to the District and Sessions Court. …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition seeking direction that they be posted to vacant posts of the Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, after the Education Officer communicated to the Director of Education (Primary) that their documents should be scrutinized and postings granted. The Director …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications filed by various petitioners against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications that had arisen in various tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the transfer was required in accordance with a Supreme …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, through counsel, requested that all these matters …
The appellant, Vatchalabai Shivaji More, challenged the award of a land acquisition proceeding where 2.82 hectares of irrigated land were taken for a storage tank. While accepting the market‑value rate fixed by the Reference Court (Rs 1,78,400 per acre), she sought separate compensation for …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, through counsel, requested that all these …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and …
The appellant, Laxmikanth Prabhakarrao Birajdar, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the respondent's counsel, Ms B. B. Gunjal, produced the original death certificate of the appellant, marking it for identification. The court accepted the death certificate …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning the petitioner, Ravindra Prakash Chand Jethani, against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance with a …
The appellants, original claimants in a 2008 land acquisition for the Karkheli Storage Tank, challenged the compensation awarded by the Learned Additional Officer (LAO) as inadequate. They argued that the Reference Court had improperly deducted 50% from the sale consideration of a comparable sale …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the Supreme Court's decision in Income Tax Officer, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking the …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning income tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought direction that all these matters be transferred to the Principal Seat of the High Court. …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications that had been pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms Rutuja Pawar and Ms Sneha More, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The appellant, a 19‑year‑old student, was convicted by a Special Judge under IPC Section 452 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act for allegedly assaulting a 17‑year‑old girl inside her house and giving her two dollars. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statements, her mother’s testimony, an …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the Supreme Court's decision in Income Tax Officer, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in compliance with a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in compliance with a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 …
The petitioner, Junaid Ahmedkhan, filed writ petition No. 7000 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, through counsel Mr. G. B. Patunkar on behalf of Mr. Vibhute Sunil M., the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally. The sole question before the …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in accordance with a …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the Supreme Court's decision in Income Tax Officer, …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, citing a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026), sought transfer of all these …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in compliance with a …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court …
The petitioners filed a criminal application seeking restoration of Criminal Application No. 3388 of 2025, which had been dismissed on 5 February 2026 for failure to take steps within the stipulated period. The petitioners argued that they were now ready to comply with the procedural requirements …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 …
The claimants' land in Jawalga village was acquired in 1983 for the K.T. Weir project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.174.90 per R for irrigated land and Rs.121.80 per R for other land in 1986. The claimants appealed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, …
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority for a railway expansion project, acquired land in Arvi village under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs 127 per square metre, which the claimants challenged before …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra, through the Revenue Secretary, to decide on their representation dated 11 March 2024, which had not yet been adjudicated. The petition raised the issue of undue delay in the consideration of the representation. …
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority, sought to acquire land in Arvi village for the expansion of a broad‑gauge railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.127 per square metre, which the claimants challenged before the reference court, leading to an …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the State and the Maharashtra State …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme …
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority, sought to acquire land in Arvi village for the expansion of a broad‑gauge railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs.127 per square metre, which was enhanced by the reference court to Rs.70 per square foot. The …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward …
A large number of writ petitions and accompanying civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance with a Supreme …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications concerning income tax matters. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court in accordance …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications following a Supreme Court judgment in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh (Diary No. (S) 2196 of 2026). Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications filed by Ravindra Prakash Chand Jethani against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of …
The applicant, Laxman Sopan Mamadge, filed an application seeking the quashment of FIR No. 0097/2023 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 447, 427 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The dispute centres on Gat No. 69, where the informant claims to have …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications filed by various petitioners against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme …
Miss Gauri Karjatkar and others filed a counter‑claim in a suit instituted by Mr Sameer Gaikwad. The 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, rejected the application to entertain the counter‑claim, alleging lack of pecuniary jurisdiction, despite earlier directions from this Court to reconsider …
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought transfer of these matters to the Principal Seat, invoking a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 …
The applicants, Usha Muralidhar Upasani and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether it could grant permission for withdrawal of a pending …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of the petitioners on the basis that their mark‑sheets had been tampered with, finding sufficient material to support the cancellation. However, the Court set aside the order that permanently …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications that had been pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court in …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for transfer to the Principal Seat of the Court. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, argued that the matters must be transferred in accordance with the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications pending before it. The petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar and Ms. Sneha More, sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the High Court, invoking a Supreme …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms Rutuja Pawar …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications for consideration following a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh v. Tej Pratap Singh. Petitioners, represented by Ms. Rutuja Pawar …
The petitioner, Sandeep Rohidas Salve, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release pending trial. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet, prompting the petitioner's counsel to seek withdrawal of the bail …
The petitioners, Ramlal Brijlal Joshi and others, filed Contempt Petition No. 392 of 2020 arising from Writ Petition No. 2076 of 2016 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners' counsel argued that the contempt petition pertained only to an interim order and that the main writ …
The applicant, Bhagwat Dnyanoba Mulgir, sought quashment of FIR No. 304 of 2025, the charge‑sheet and a pending special case alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (including sections 69, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5), 89) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …
The petitioners sought a stay of an interim order but the competent authority later issued a final order. The petitioners then applied to withdraw the writ petition and to challenge the final order in separate proceedings. The Court examined whether a writ petition could be withdrawn after a final …
The petitioner, Lokseva Sevabhavi Sanstha, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order had been complied with, and the Additional Public Prosecutor filed a compliance affidavit. The court accepted the compliance …
Lokseva Sevabhavi Sanstha filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior contempt order against Dr. Harshdeep Kamble and another. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order had been complied with. The court examined the submission and found that the compliance rendered the …
The petitioners, who are doctors employed in government and semi‑government hospitals, challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government Resolution dated 07‑08‑2012 that barred them from private practice and made the receipt of a non‑practicing allowance compulsory. The issue was whether …
The State of Maharashtra filed a first appeal against a 2007 judgment and award in a land acquisition proceeding (LAR No. 1972/2005) related to the Waghur Project. The learned Advocate General for the State argued that the same court had already decided appeals filed by the original claimants …
The appellants‑claimants challenged the awards dated 18‑04‑2008 and 21‑04‑2008 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kandhar in four land‑acquisition references concerning dry lands acquired for the Upper Manar Project. They argued that the controversy was identical to that decided in First …
The appellants challenged the 2008 judgments and awards of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kandhar, concerning land acquired for the Upper Manar Project. They argued that the same controversy had already been decided in First Appeal No. 276 of 2013, and therefore the present appeals should be …
Vishnu, son of Pratap Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 6862 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Latur. The respondents were the Returning Officer for that election and other officials. The petitioner’s counsel …
In a contempt petition (No. 322 of 2013) arising out of Writ Petition No. 1540 of 2013, the petitioners, Sanjay Lalsing Rathod and others, sought relief against the respondents, J.S. SahrAIYA and others. The petition alleged that a previous order had been contravened, leading to contempt …
The applicant and the prosecutrix, both adults, were in a consensual romantic relationship and the FIR (Crime No. 97 of 2026) alleged offences under Sections 64, 64(2)(m), 69 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The parties later entered into a compromise deed in which the prosecutrix …
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Sajid Majid Khan and Moin Majid Khan in connection with FIR No. 36/2026 alleging crop‑insurance fraud under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Applicant 1 withdrew his application, and the court dismissed it as …
The appellants‑claimants challenged the awards dated 18‑04‑2008 and 21‑04‑2008 made by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kandhar in respect of land acquired for the Upper Manar Project. They argued that the controversy was identical to that decided in First Appeal No. 276 of 2013, a view conceded by …
The appellants‑claimants challenged the awards dated 18‑04‑2008 and 21‑04‑2008 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kandhar in respect of lands acquired for the Upper Manar Project. They argued that the controversy was identical to that decided in First Appeal No. 276 of 2013, where the Court …
The appellants challenged the award of a land acquisition reference concerning 47 acres in Vilad village, Ahmednagar, seeking higher compensation and interest. The High Court noted that identical issues had been decided in earlier appeals (First Appeal No.639 of 2010 and First Appeal No.2196 of …
Sudhir Subhash Satpute filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and whether the writ petition could be restored. The Court held that the delay may be condoned …
The petitioner, Pravar Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed University), through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw its contempt petition filed earlier. The respondents were Vilas Bhikulal Mundada and another. The bench considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Sayyad Jamaluddin Gaffar, filed a writ petition (WP 9477/2022) and a related civil application (No. 15997 of 2022) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later instructed his counsel, Mr. Syed Mois Ali (h/f Mr. Suhail Farooqui Gulam), to withdraw both …
The petitioner, Ashok Madan Prakashkar, filed a contempt petition. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, noting compliance, ordered that the petition stand disposed. No further directions were given. The judgment was delivered …
The petitioner filed a civil suit for partition which was ultimately decreed, but the respondents sought to challenge the decree through various appeals and a pending civil review. In parallel, mutation proceedings were initiated, and the Sub Divisional Officer kept the matter on "sane die" due to …
The appellant was convicted under Section 354 IPC for outraging the modesty of a deaf‑and‑dumb girl who was allegedly taken to a school toilet and stripped. The appellant appealed, arguing that the victim’s non‑verbal testimony, recorded through an interpreter, was unreliable and that the …
The petitioner, Suresh Bharat Badakh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised a stay application under section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which was pending before the respondent. The …
Smt. Manjusha Rajendra Shinde filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no …
The applicants were arrested in connection with Crime No. 303 of 2026, arising from a dispute over hoisting a blue flag on a pole already bearing a saffron flag, which led to stone‑pelting by a mob of over 200 persons and injuries to an informant and police officers. The applicants contended that no …
The 22‑year‑old applicant sought anticipatory bail for an alleged attempt to murder under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that he assaulted an informant with an iron rod, causing three skull fractures and loss of consciousness. The applicant argued that there were …
Four writ petitions filed in 2016 challenged the jurisdiction of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) over pharmacy colleges, seeking relief regarding admissions and regulatory authority. The petitioners argued that the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) should have supremacy over …
Four writ petitions (Nos. 6687, 6689, 6690, 6691 of 2016) were filed by pharmacy colleges challenging the admission process and the jurisdictional hierarchy between the Pharmacy Council of India and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). The petitioners contended that AICTE's …
The applicant filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 120‑day delay in filing a criminal revision. The court considered the reasons provided in the application. It held that the delay could be condoned and allowed the application. Consequently, the criminal application was disposed and …
The High Court heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from Crime No. 303 of 2026, involving a dispute over hoisting a blue flag over a saffron flag on an electric pole, which led to stone‑pelting and injuries to an informant and police personnel. The applicants, named in the FIR, …
The appellant, Rushindar Deorao Khole, challenged a 1990 award of compensation for his agricultural land acquired for an industrial area, alleging that the reference for enhanced compensation was dismissed because it was filed three days beyond the 60‑day limitation period. The reference court had …
The petitioners, the management of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Urdu High School, sought to set aside a School Tribunal order that had declared the oral termination of a watchman on 15‑02‑2011 invalid and ordered his reinstatement with back wages. The employee had approached the Tribunal under Section 9 …
Petitioner Atul Subhash Dusane filed a writ petition challenging his appointment. The Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Region issued a communication dated 07.03.2019 confirming his absorption as an Assistant Teacher in Zilla Parishad, Nashik, thereby redressing his grievance. The petitioner …
Four writ petitions filed in 2016 challenged the jurisdiction of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) over pharmacy colleges, seeking relief regarding admissions. The petitioners argued that the Pharmacy Council should have exclusive authority over such matters. The Court observed …
The petitioner, appointed on a clock‑hour basis in 2004 to a Lecturer‑Hindi post reserved for the Scheduled Tribes (ST) category, sought regularisation as a full‑time lecturer under the Scheduled Castes (SC) category. The University rejected his 2016 proposal, relying on the Government Resolution …
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring first appeals against orders dated 19 August 2025. The applications were filed well beyond the prescribed period, with delays ranging from 444 to 1829 days. The State respondents contested the applications, …
The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to compel the sub‑registrar to register a sale deed of tenancy land that she had purchased from the defendant under an oral agreement, having paid part of the consideration by cheque. The sub‑registrar refused registration citing revenue record …
The petitioner, Bhikesing Amrut Patil, filed Writ Petition No. 7171 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was argued by advocates Sachin A. Mane and Prakashsing B. Patil. The court observed that, due to the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …
The applicant, Bhagwan Kondiba Kakde, filed a criminal application (No. 2458 of 2026) seeking to initiate appropriate proceedings against an Investigating Officer. The applicant, through counsel Mr. R.B. Dhakane (on behalf of Mr. Andhale M.R.), later instructed the court to withdraw the application. …
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring first appeals against orders dated 19 August 2025. The applications were filed well beyond the prescribed period, with delays ranging from 444 to 1829 days. The State respondents contested the applications, …
The applicants, Somnath S/o Vithal Shinde and another, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later instructed their counsel to seek the Court's permission to withdraw the revision. The learned Advocate for the applicants moved the Court requesting …
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring first appeals against orders dated 19 August 2025. The applications were filed well beyond the prescribed period, with delays ranging from 444 to 1829 days. The State respondents contested the applications, …
The applicant, Ashish Chandan Imale, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in his proceedings against the Union of India and others. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned under the applicable procedural rules. Relying on the submissions and the merits of the …
The Executive Engineer, as the acquiring body, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,053‑day delay in filing a first appeal against a judgment and award dated 3 May 2016. The applicant argued that the delay was not intentional but resulted from administrative procedures required to …
The Executive Engineer, Mini Irrigation Division, Z.P. Osmanabad filed an application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The application sought relief after the disposal of a first appeal (ST) No. 18643 of 2019. The Court observed that, in view of the disposal of the first appeal, no …
Ujwla Vijay Bhosle filed a civil application against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant sought relief under prayer clause B, which pertained to amending the pleadings and adding respondents. The High Court, after considering the reasons set out in the application, allowed the …
The applicant, Santosh Maruti Revgade, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both parties were heard, and the court expressed reluctance to grant relief. On the court's indication, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application. The court …
The petitioners, Haridas Mahadev Khande and others, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1175 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision. Their counsel informed the court that the petitioners had already been acquitted by an order dated 15 June 2026 in RCC No. …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 79/2021 registered at Ardhapur Police Station and a restraining order against the respondents from filing a charge-sheet. The Court noted that, following the FIR, a criminal case (R.C.C. No. 131/2021) had already been …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. B.R. Warma, sought a court order directing the Assistant Charity Commissioner of Nanded to expedite the adjudication of four pending Change Report proceedings (Nos. 785 of 2021, 322 of 2022, 325 of 2022, and 623 of 2022) concerning their trust. The respondents, …
The applicant, Samir Kha, was charged under the POCSO Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly forcing a 16‑year‑old girl into a sexual relationship and kidnapping her to Surat. The victim, who had met the applicant via Instagram, testified that the relationship was non‑consensual and that …
The petitioner sought registration of an offence against the intervenor for allegedly overpaying Rs.37,50,05,051 to farmers under the National Highways Act, 1956, based on a 2020 report. The court considered a later departmental enquiry report dated 12‑Nov‑2025, which found no evidence to support …
Sachin Sarjerao Chavan was arrested on 17‑Nov‑2024 for assaulting an informant who later died of septicemia following facial bone fractures. The prosecution alleged that Chavan struck the victim with a stone, causing serious injuries, while the post‑mortem indicated death was due to infection rather …
The applicants, Akshay Dadu Chavan and another, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the …
The petitioners filed a criminal application in 2010 seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The matter was adjourned multiple times, and the original criminal case (S.C.C. No. 213 of 2009) was disposed on 16 February 2016 because the complainant was absent and no steps were taken to …
Anandrao Ramrao Patil appealed a 2019 land acquisition compensation award, filing his first appeal 335 days late. He claimed the delay was due to lack of legal knowledge, difficulty in obtaining counsel, and financial constraints. The High Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Suresh …
