Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 4801–5000

ROHIDAS RANGNATH POLE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Rohidas Rangnath Pole and another filed a contempt petition (No. 365 of 2020) against the State of Maharashtra and others in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petitioners, through Advocate V. A. Patil and counsel S. B. Chaudhari, asserted that the order of contempt had been complied with. …

PAWAN SUBHASH SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The appellant was convicted by a Special Judge for outraging the modesty of a woman under Section 354-A(1)(i) IPC. The appellant appealed, arguing that the prosecution case lacked independent corroboration, that the victim's mother’s testimony was hearsay, and that no medical examination was …

BHAUSAHEB TUKARAM KHODADEversusNAMDEO SAKHARAM KHODADE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bhausahab Tukaram Khodade, filed Writ Petition No. 8006 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. While the petition was pending, the regular civil suit numbered 862 of 2005, which involved the same parties and issues, was finally …

GANESH VENKAT GADEKARversusRAJENDRA PRABHAKAR GADEKAR

Transfer to other court

In Criminal Appeal No. 608 of 2019, the respondent was represented by an advocate appointed by the High Court. The learned counsel highlighted that an order dated 18-03-2026 transferred the matter to the District and Sessions Court, but the advocate's fees were not quantified in that order. The …

MAHADEO SITARAM TEKALE AND ORSversusDEELIP WAKIL MULEKAR AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners Mahadeo Sitaram Tekale and others filed an application seeking condonation of a 907‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that no sufficient reason existed and that condoning the delay would preclude payment of interest to the …

BALAJI NIVRUTTI HAMBARDEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Balaji Nivrutti Hambarde filed Contempt Petition No. 368 of 2012 (WP/584/2011) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner alleged non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The respondents, through counsel, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The bench …

ARVIND PANDURANG BAWAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Arvind Pandurang Bawake was arrested in Crime No.213 of 2026 for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, stemming from his role as a special power of attorney in a land sale transaction. The prosecution alleged cheating and criminal …

SHAMSUNDAR NARSINGRAO NAIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shamsundar Narsingrao Naik, a state transport bus conductor, was convicted by the Jalna District Court for molestation of a minor under Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Section 354-A of the Indian Penal Code, receiving a three‑year sentence. He filed a …

NAKUL SURESH TAMBEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nakul Suresh Tambe, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the prayers originally sought in the PIL no longer …

KAMAL GANGADHAR JAGTAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 6423 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. On 12 August 2026, the court recorded the absence of the petitioner's counsel. No counsel appeared on the scheduled date of 27 August 2026. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of …

KAKUJI RAMCHANDRA THAKREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a member of the Bhill Scheduled Tribe, sought restoration of agricultural land that had been sold in 1965 without the permission required under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. His father had previously filed a similar restoration claim in 1981, …

PRABHAKAR BARKU SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAH.

ABATED

The appellant, Prabhakar Barku Sathe, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the appellant’s advocate withdrew his authority, prompting the court to issue a notice to the appellant. A service report later indicated that the appellant had died, and the court …

BABITAI NAGORAO IREWADversusTHE COLLECTOR NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Babitai Nagorao Irewad, filed writ petition No. 7046 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector Nanded and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be dismissed due to the passage of time. The Court examined …

PARAJI DHIRAMAN BRINGANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The father of a 17-year-old girl filed a habeas corpus petition seeking her release from police custody. The police produced the girl before the court, and her school leaving certificate confirmed her age as 17 years and 8 months. During a private interaction, the girl stated she resides with her …

AVINASH GENA PANDULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Avinash Gena Pandule, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for a special independent investigating team to conduct investigation into Crime No.12/2026 under Section 108 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 39 of the Maharashtra Money Lending Regulation Act, 2014. The …

PAPINDER KAURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees' Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …

KIRAN RAMDAS BORHADEversusVIVEK MADHAV ALIAS KADUBA GORE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vivek Madhav alias Kaduba Gore (Applicant 1) and Samadhan Dagduba Gore (Applicant 2) in connection with FIR No.30/2026 alleging assault under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Applicant 2 withdrew his …

SAMPAT GANPAT WANVEversusAMBADAS GANPAT VANVE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sampat Ganpat Wanve, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondents, Ambadas Ganpat Vanve and others. The petition was argued by Advocate Vivek Bhavthankar on behalf of the petitioner, while Advocate S.J. Salunke …

SAKINA KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Sakina Khan and Papinder Kaur filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus directing the respondents to deposit salary arrears and pay Employees Provident Fund contributions with interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not first …

KIRAN RAOSAHEB JAGDALE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants, Somnath Shingate and Narendra Sonawane in one appeal and Kiran Jagdale and Harshad Kakde in another, applied for bail in connection with CR No. 481/2025, which alleged assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the …

KANTABAI SHIVAJI GADAKHversusJAGANNATH BHIKA GADAKH AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kantabai Shivaji Gadakh, filed a suit seeking a perpetual injunction against the respondents for alleged encroachment of ancestral land. The respondents filed a counter‑claim for ownership of a portion of the land and later sought to amend their written statement and counter‑claim. …

DEVIDAS LAXMAN PRADHAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Devidas Laxman Pradhan and others, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 197/2026, alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR was lodged on 29 March 2026 for an incident that occurred on 24 March 2026, alleging that …

RAOSAHEB BHIMRAJ PAGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raosaheb Pagare, who was charged under IPC sections 395 and 397 and MCOCA sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) for assault and rioting. The applicant argued that there was no direct evidence against him, that the test identification parade was the …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusSHIVANAND ANANDRAO HONSHETTE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed a First Appeal before the Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 360 of 2001. The appellant subsequently submitted a withdrawal …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.versusSHIVANAND ANANDRAO HONSHETTE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The New India Assurance Company filed a First Appeal before the Special Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad, seeking to withdraw the appeal after accepting the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nanded, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 360 of 2001. The appellant submitted a …

DEELIP S/O. BHIKAJI RAHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Deelip, failed to appear before the High Court on 25 August 2026, prompting the court to issue a non‑bailable warrant. He subsequently appeared before the court, represented by Advocate Shardul G. Shinde. The applicant contended that he had already served his sentence, and therefore …

ATUL S/O. BABASAHEB KHILLARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Atul, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief after a settlement was reached with the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, per the order dated 07.04.2026, no cost should be imposed because the settlement terms were filed within four weeks. The victim …

SHAIKH SAMEERUDDIN AJEEMODDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shaikh Sameeruddin Ajeemoddin filed Contempt Petition No. 415 of 2013 challenging a contempt order issued against him in the earlier proceeding WP/8084/2012. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the petitioner had fully complied with the contempt …

SYED AFROZ BEGUM SYED ALI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Syed Afroz Begum and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 June 2022 that altered their pay scale. The petition contended that Clause‑3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016 was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court observed that the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusPURUSHOTTAMDAS GULABDAS SHAH

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay heard two first appeals and two cross‑objections arising from the same land acquisition for the New Aurangabad development scheme. The claimants sought enhanced compensation beyond the original award of Rs.7,500 per acre, and the acquiring body (CIDCO) challenged the …

RAMBHAU TUKARAM WANVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ramabhau Tukaram Wanve, filed an application seeking condonation of a 160‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal. The application was supported by Advocate Prakash B. Jadhav, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Advocate S. M. Ganachari. The Court examined the reasons …

SUDHIR VASANTRAO KOLASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Sudhir Vasantrao Kolase, appealed under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged assault and caste‑based abuse that led to the death of a deceased by alleged poison consumption. The FIR …

BALRAJ SHIVRAM CHONDE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

Balraj Shivram Chonde and another filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, both applicants were arrested and subsequently released on regular bail. The State of Maharashtra, through advocate P. J. Bharad, informed the …

PANDURANG VITHAL VAIDYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Pandurang Vithal Vaidya, one of three accused in a FIR under Sections 105, 115(2), 189(2) and 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, applied for anticipatory bail. The High Court had earlier imposed a condition that he attend the police station every Monday. The applicant complied and argued …

HEDGEWAR GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTDversusVILAS KACHRU MADAVGADH

Transfer to other court

The appellant, Hedgewar Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd, appealed against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a blind victim, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction for the police inspector to record her supplementary statement in Crime No.133 of 2026. The respondent State argued that such a direction could be issued to the investigating officer. The Court agreed, directing …

MAHADEV BALASAHEB GHOLVEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mahadev Balasaheb Gholve filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to register an offence against an intervenor for alleged misappropriation in the Loknete Gopinath Munde Backward Co-operative Spinning Mill, based on a complaint dated 16‑10‑2019. The Court’s resource personnel report …

TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusMUKHTYARSING SUPADU PATIL

DISMISSED

The Special Land Acquisition Officer acquired 74 R of land in Dharagir village for a medium project, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1998 and declaring an award in 2000 with minimal compensation. The claimant sought a higher market value under Section 18, presenting sale evidence and a private …

RAHUL @ BALA DIGAMBAR SONWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISMISSED

Rahul @ Bala Digambar Sonwane filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to decide his representation dated 24.08.2020 and to award compensation. The petitioner failed to take any steps to pursue the matter after 2023 and was absent when the court heard the petition on 31.08.2026. The court …

NILESH ASHOK JAGDALEversusSUVARANA NILESH JAGDALE

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Nilesh Ashok Jagdale, filed a criminal revision application (No. 210 of 2022) against Suvarna Nilesh Jagdale. The High Court, noting its earlier order that the matter would be dismissed for want of prosecution if no one appeared, observed that no party appeared on the scheduled date. …

BALU BHAGWAN MULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

DISPOSED OFF

Balu Bhagwan Mule filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a decision on his representation dated 13 August 2025, which the State of Maharashtra had not yet acted upon. The petitioner alleged undue delay contrary to the Court’s earlier orders and a Government …

OMPRAKASH RATANLAL MALPANIversusPANCHAKSHARI GAURISHANKAR APPA MITKARI

Transfer to other court

The appellant, Omprakash Ratanlal Malpani, appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), he sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court. …

OMPRAKASH RATANLAL MALPANIversusPANCHAKSHARI GAURISHANKAR APPA MITKARI

Transfer to other court

The appellant, Omprakash Ratanlal Malpani, appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and …

OMPRAKASH RATANLAL MALPANIversusPANCHAKSHARI GAURISHANKAR APPA MITKARI

Transfer to other court

The appellant, Omprakash Ratanlal Malpani, appealed against an order of acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the District and …

DNYANDEO NAGORAO SAKHARE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OHTERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a group of writ petitions filed by former Maharashtra government employees seeking monetary benefits and pensionary arrears. The petitioners argued that their pensions were calculated without the annual increment in their last drawn salary and …

VASANT DAULAT DEORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 5372 of 2019) arising from Regular Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2011. The court noted that the underlying appeal had been withdrawn on 18 October 2019, leaving no surviving cause of action. Consequently, the writ petition could not proceed. The court therefore …

HUMAYUN RASHEED S/O. UMAR NAIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Humayun Rasheed, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction to register an FIR against several respondents for alleged illegal appointments. The court noted that the petitioner had approached the police on 19‑08‑2019, challenging the appointment of Mr. Ashfaquddin Kadri …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusKAUSHALYA RAGHU MULE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the compensation awarded to claimants whose lands in Salegaon village were acquired for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons. The claimants sought parity with other similarly situated claimants who had been awarded Rs.20 per square foot in …

AMBUBAI SURESH PAVTEKARversusSUMAN MADHUKARRAO CHINKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner died and no legal representatives were filed on record. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be abated. The court examined whether a writ petition can continue …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusKAUSHALYA RAGHU MULE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed the compensation awarded for lands acquired in Salegaon village for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons, while the claimants filed cross‑objections seeking the same enhanced rate granted to similarly situated claimants in other appeals. The original …

PARMESHWAR BHAIDAS DEOREversusNIVEDITA VED SINGHAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Parmeshwar Bhaidas Deore filed a contempt petition against Nivedita Ved Singhal and others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the respondents filed a reply indicating that the order in the contempt proceedings had been complied with. The Court examined the reply and found that …

MAHEK LAXMAN PUSOLLUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Mahek Laxman Pusollu, was appointed on compassionate grounds to a class‑IV Safai Kamgar post after his father's death, despite his H.S.C. and MS‑CIT qualifications. He later sought promotion to a class‑III post, invoking Government Resolutions dated 23‑08‑1996 and 08‑07‑2008, and …

RAMESHWAR SHIVAJI KONDALWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rameshwar Shivaji Kondalwade, who is charged under Sections 108, 64(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for an alleged sexual assault on Savita and the subsequent suicide of the victim. The prosecution’s case rests …

DEORAM ZIPA PATILversusSPECIAL LAND ACQ OFFICER and ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The High Court considered appeals concerning lands acquired for the MIDC Dhule project. The claimants argued that their case was identical to a previously decided matter (FA No. 1210/12) and sought enhanced compensation and statutory benefits. The court accepted that the controversy was the same as …

BABRUVAHAN VYANKURAM CHEBLEversusKANTABAI BABRUWAHAN BASTAPURE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner claimed ownership of 82 R of land that was part of a 1962 partition deed and purchased by his son in 2001, alleging that the respondents were obstructing his cultivation in June 2023. The trial court held that the petitioner had not produced prima facie evidence of obstruction and …

JANARDAN GORAKSHANATH SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Janardan Gorakshanath Salve filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody. The applicant's counsel, on instructions, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, noting its disinclination to entertain the application, …

PADMABAI SHAMRAO KARHEversusDISTRICT COLLECTOR BEED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petition challenged an order of the District Collector, Beed, which had validated a no‑confidence motion passed against Padmabai Shamrao Karhe on 16 January 2026 under Section 35(3‑B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The petitioner argued that a prior no‑confidence motion, held on …

BHARATI RAMESH TAYADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ms. Bharati Ramesh Tayade, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Nashik, to decide her claim dated 01/06/2012 within a stipulated time. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner, while Ms. J. P. Reddy, AGP, …

SHESHRAO MANIKRAO PATIL AND ANOTHERversusBHIMRAO SANGRAM GAROLE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Sheshrao Manikrao Patil and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matter that was also the subject of a civil suit. During the pendency of the writ petition, the underlying civil suit was abated, rendering the cause of action …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusKESHAV BHAUSAHEB KALE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a batch of first‑appeal stamp cases challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the reference court erred by considering sale comparables that were not in the vicinity of the …

MOHAN KISANRAO BHOSALE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mohan Kisanrao Bhosale and another filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding their representation dated 22 June 2026. They sought a directive compelling the State and other respondents to make a decision on the representation. The Court examined the relevant Government policy, …

SHRIKANT MAROTI KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, ShriKant Maroti Kadam, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the bail application was disposed …

NISHA VINOD YEOLEversusVINOD SUKHDEO YEOLE

Rejected at Admission stage

The applicant filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to transfer Marriage Petition No. 377 of 2021 from Jalgaon to Beed. No notice was issued to the respondent in the application. When the matter was called for hearing, the applicant failed to …

RAM BHANUDAS MAGARversusNARAYAN SANTRAM BANSODE

DISPOSED OFF

Ram Bhanudas Magar filed a contempt petition against Narayan Santram Bansode after a prior order directed the Head Master to forward the petitioner's proposal, including his pay scale, to the appropriate authorities. The respondent filed an affidavit stating that the proposal had been forwarded to …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusARJUN GANPAT KAMBLE AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a batch of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the reference court improperly relied on distant comparable sale transactions and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSUNIL DAGADU GHORPADE AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar district. The State argued that the Reference Court erred by considering sale comparables that were not in the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusRAJENDRAKUMAR ATMARAM AGARWAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had upheld compensation determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for several parcels of land. …

PRASHANT NARAYAN JATALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Prashant Narayan Jatal, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his empty tipper truck (Reg. No. MH-24-AU-7219) which he alleges was seized by the Tahsildar without a panchnama. The respondents produced a panchnama dated 5 June 2026, stating that the petitioner was illegally …

RAGHUNATH WAMAN SANAP AND ANOTHERversusSANJAY NILKANTHRAO LAKHE PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Ragunath Waman Sanap and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent Sanjay Nilkanthrao Lakhe Patil. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the cause of action had become …

VIKAS PANDIT PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vikas Pandit Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because of the passage of time. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSHRIMANT MADHAV BABAR

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed the award of compensation in five land‑acquisition cases concerning lands in Salegaon village that were acquired for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons. The claimants argued that, in earlier judgments involving similar lands, the compensation had been …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusPOPAT DAGADU SHEWALE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to set aside the compensation awards granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, in numerous land‑acquisition cases. The State argued that …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSHRIMANT MADHAV BABAR

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the compensation awarded to claimants whose lands in Salegaon village were acquired for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons. The original award was Rs 15,500‑20,000 per hectare, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs 96,400 per hectare. The …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusBABAN SHRIPATI NIKAM AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed multiple first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to set aside the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had upheld compensation determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for various parcels of …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusMADHUKAR KASHINATH BABAR

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed the award of compensation in five land‑acquisition cases concerning lands in Salegaon village, acquired for rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons. The claimants argued that, in similar acquisitions for the same project, the Court had enhanced compensation to …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSHUBHANGI BHANUSAHEB SHEWALE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first appeals under the Stamp Act challenging the compensation awarded by a Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the reference court erred by considering sale comparables that were not in the vicinity of …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusMACHINDRA PARBATI DONGARE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to set aside the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had determined compensation for lands acquired under the land‑acquisition process. The State …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusRAJKUMARI KANHAYALAL NAVLANI AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the compensation awarded by a Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by a Reference Court for numerous land acquisition cases in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the lands were remote from the …

CHANDRAKALA ISHWAR GAIKWADversusMADHUKAR NAVNATH BIDVE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, ChandraKala Ishwar Gaikwad, challenged his disqualification under Section 14(1)(j‑3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. He argued that the term of the panchayat body had expired, making the disqualification co‑terminus with the body’s term and therefore no longer …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSANJAY VINOD AGARWAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, concerning compensation for lands acquired under a special land acquisition proceeding. The State argued that the lands were remote from Nagar‑Manmad Road and …

RAJENDRA LAHANU TULEversusFULABAI PADNURANG KOLTE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajendra Lahanu Tule, filed writ petitions No. 7544 of 2016 and No. 7499 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Fulabai Padnurang Kolte and another. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petitions should be entertained. The Court examined the …

BABASAHEB PIRAJI ARGADEversusKHUSHALSING PARDESHI

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Babasaheb Argade alleged that the Additional Commissioner and Additional Collector committed contempt by entertaining a revision and an appeal that allegedly contravened the High Court's interim order dated 29‑07‑2024, which stayed the award of a National Lok‑Adalat in RCA No.5/2016. The …

ZEESHAN JAAN MOHMMAD SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Zeeshan Jaan Mohammad Shaikh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORSversusBHANUDAS SANTRAM SHINGADE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra filed multiple first appeals challenging awards dated 23 February 2007 in land acquisition proceedings of 1996. The trial court had awarded compensation, which the reference court enhanced, but the State argued the enhancement exceeded four times the amount awarded by the …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORSversusMAHALING SUBHASH MITKARI

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment and award dated 23 February 2007 issued by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur, concerning land acquisition proceedings from 1996. The appellants contended that the compensation enhanced by the reference court should not exceed four …

PRADIP SHREEDHARRAO JOSHIversusTHE POLICE INSPECTOR AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging a notice issued by the police. The High Court ordered the petitioner to place on record a copy of the reply to the impugned notice by 23 July 2026. The petitioner failed to comply, and the Court granted a further opportunity on 6 August 2026, …

SUNANDABAI GULABRAO SANER PATIL AND ANRversusRAJENDRA BHASKARRAO VABHANDIK AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, wife and son of the deceased teacher Gulabrao Saner, appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs 14,32,756 for a fatal road accident on 14 July 2009. They argued that the Tribunal erred by applying the split‑multiplier method, by deducting 20% income‑tax from …

SUSHILABAI AMBADASRAO and OTHERS.versusAMBABAI BHAGWANRAO and OTHERS.

DISMISSED

The appellants filed a civil application in 2007 seeking a direction under the court's inherent powers, specifically Section 151 read with Order 22 Rule 10-A of the CPC, to compel respondents 3 and 4 to produce their death certificates. The respondents argued that a death certificate is a public …

RAJENDRA LAHANU TULEversusFULABAI PADNURANG KOLTE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajendra Lahanu Tule, filed writ petitions (909 WRIT PETITION NO. 7544 of 2016 and WRIT PETITION NO. 7499 of 2016) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Pravin D. Biradar, appearing on behalf of …

CHAYA SHAILENDRA KAMBLEversusSHAILENDRA KESHEVRAO KAMBLE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Chaya Shailendra Kamble filed Writ Petition No. 8468 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of Shailendra Keshevarao Kamble and another. The Court examined the status of the related family court proceedings (Petition A-No.87 of 2022) before the Family Court, …

SUMIT JAIRAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sumit Jairam Patil, filed a writ petition seeking the approval of his appointment by the Education Officer (Secondary). The petition alleged that the proposal for his appointment was pending with the respondent. The Court examined whether the Education Officer was obligated to …

SOMNATH KARBHARI DHOBALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Somnath Karbhari Dhobale and others, filed a writ petition challenging the failure of Respondent No.2 to decide their representation dated 10 May 2024. The High Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to consider the representation on its merits. The Court found no …

BALASAHEB S/O. PUNJAJI JAGTAP.versusVARSHA W/O. BALASAHEB JAGTAP.

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a Family Court appeal, alleging the appeal was filed late. The court examined the office remark, which indicated that the appeal had actually been filed within the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the court found no …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusRANJANA VILAS WAGHMARE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Limited relating to motor accident claim petitions. The appellant submitted withdrawal letters and authority letters dated 25‑03‑2026, which the court accepted and …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusSINDHU RAOSAHEB JONDHALE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals and civil applications filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against various claimants arising from motor accident claim petitions. The insurance company submitted withdrawal letters and authority …

RAMESHWAR FAKIRCHAND TOTALAversusSHANKARLAL GANGADHAR SHANKARPALI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rameshwar Fakirchand Totala, filed writ petition No. 11158 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shankarlal Gangadhar Shankarpali. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Ganesh S. Yadav (through V.C.). During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed …

HARSHADA DEVIDAS GHATEversusDEVIDAS SUKHDEV GHATE

DISMISSED

Harshada Devidas Ghate filed a Section 125 CrPC application for maintenance against her husband Devidas Sukhdev Ghate, claiming a valid Hindu marriage on 11‑11‑2010. The Family Court dismissed the application, finding that Harshada had a prior marriage to Ganesh More and had not produced a competent …

REHAN ZAHEER AHMED SHAIKHversusMOHD. ZAFARPHASHA AKTHAR MIYAN AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Rehan Zaheer Ahmed Shaikh filed a civil application against Mohd. Zafarphasha Akthar Miyan and another. The respondents were duly served but failed to appear before the court. The court examined the application despite the non‑appearance of the respondents. Relying on the prayer clause “A” of the …

ASHOK SHAHADEO BHOKREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN AT ADMISSION STAGE

Ashok Shahadeo Bhokre filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a disinclination to grant any relief. On the instructions of the applicant, counsel sought to …

NANDKUMAR LAXMAN DAKOREversusTHE RETURNING OFFICER PARBHANI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nandkumar, challenged the nomination of respondent No.4 as a delegate to the Parbhani District Central Cooperative Bank election, alleging that he was a defaulter of Kawalgaon Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society and therefore disqualified under Section 73CA(1)(i) of the …

NIVRUTI RAMRAO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nivruti Ramrao Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking appointment under the Project Affected Persons (PAP) reservation quota. Respondent No.2 argued that the petitioner’s mother had already been appointed under the same quota in 1990 and that the scheme permits only one appointment …

Indrajit So Krunaji JadhavversusThe State of Maharashtra Through, Collector

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body in an appeal. The High Court had previously ordered that 75% of the disputed amount be deposited by the acquiring body. The court held that, given the deposit, the claimants may withdraw the …

Rajendra Krishna ManeversusThe State of Maharashtra Through, Collector

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Rajendra Krishna Mane filed a civil application seeking the withdrawal of the entire amount deposited by the Acquiring Body as security for a stay granted by this Court. The stay had already been ordered, and the applicant relied on a prior decision (First Appeal No.445 of 2023, decided on 28 April …

BAJIRAO RAGHUNATH VANJARIversusKEVALBAI HIMATRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Bajirao Raghunath Vanjari filed writ petition No. 7704 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against respondents including Kevalbai Himatrao Patil. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil suit No. 3 of 2005, which was pending before the Civil Judge, Junior …

The Oriental Insurance Company LtdversusVilas Bhaskar Jadhav and Anr

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 194‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a separate application for a stay of execution of the impugned judgment. The court examined the delay, finding it was caused by administrative exigency and not deliberate, and …

The Oriental Insurance Company LtdversusVilas Bhaskar Jadhav and Anr

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 194‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a separate application for a stay of execution of the impugned judgment. The court examined the delay, finding it was caused by administrative exigency and not deliberate, and …

VAIBHAV V NAWADKARversusVASANTRAO BHAGWANRAO SUWARNAKAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Vasantrao Bhagwanrao Suwarnakar filed a contempt petition alleging that an interim order passed in his writ petition (WP/525/2007) was being disobeyed. The High Court noted that the main writ petition had already been disposed on 24 June 2008, leaving no operative order to be contravened. …

GUDDU .. KANSHA WAHAB SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking parole. During proceedings, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner had already been released. The court examined whether parole could be granted to a person who is no longer in custody. Finding that the petitioner was …

THE STATE OF MAHversusSURESH PANDHARINATH MAHAJAN and ANR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra acquired 79 ropani of land in Hol village, Jalgaon district, for a civil court building, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1986 and awarding compensation of Rs 40 per square metre. The claimants challenged the award, relying on a 1986 sale (Exhibit‑41) of 320 sq m in the …

VIJAY MADANCHAND JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Vijay Madanchand Jain, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1105 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest in a criminal case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A. D. Ostwal, and counsel for the …

SANDESH HARISHCHANDRA KAWATHEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Sandesh Harishchandra Kawathekar filed a writ petition alleging that Respondents No.6 and No.7 failed to implement an earlier order directing verification of his sports certificate. The Court noted that despite the order issued by Respondent No.3 (Joint Director of Sports) on 25.07.2025, …

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.versusDurga Vitthal Khadap and Ors.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, Durga Vitthal Khadap and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in their proceedings before the High Court at Aurangabad. They also filed a separate application for withdrawal of an amount, which the court deferred to the final hearing. The court examined the …

M/S SANJAY TRADERSversusRAMCHANDRA TUKARAM PATIL AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, M/s Sanjay Traders, filed a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondents. The matter was heard before the Hon'ble Justice Abhay S. Waghwase. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant stated that the dispute had been amicably settled …

ANJANABAI ROHIDAS ANEBOINWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Chinna Vithal Dahilod, filed a bail application (Bail Application No. 956 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing, the court indicated its reluctance to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty …

ASHOK RAMDAS MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Ashok Ramdas Mahajan, filed a bail application (BA/1282/2026) seeking release pending trial. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet, prompting the applicant to request withdrawal of the bail application and permission to file a fresh application …

JAVED AHMAD SHAIKH HABIBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Javed Ahmad Shaikh Habib, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed, and the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the bail application with liberty to file a fresh one before the trial …

LAXMAN DHONDIBA FARTADEversusCOLLECTOR BEED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Laxman Dhondiba Fartade filed a writ petition (No. 8069 of 2016) before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector, Beed and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Bhavthankar Vivek Vasantrao. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the …

DARASINGH DAULATSINGH THAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Hanumansinh Gangasinh Thakur and Darasingh Daulatsingh Thakur filed separate bail applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both applicants, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the applications and to re‑file them after the prosecution produces the viscera report, …

ADITYA LAHU SAKATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Aditya Lahu Sakat, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release pending trial. The Court expressed its disinclination to grant bail, after which the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application and to file a …

MANINDARSINGH DHARAMSINGH JAHAGIRDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

VAISHALI MANGESH PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners, appointed before 1 November 2005, filed a writ petition seeking entitlement to the old pension scheme. They contended that the issue was under active consideration by the State and that a proposal had been submitted to the Education Officer. The petitioners requested permission to …

SHAMSUNDAR VAIJNATH KADAM AND ANOTHERversusSHRIRANG VYANKAT KADAM AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a 2014 order by the State Minister (Revenue) that allowed a revision of a consolidation scheme for land in Wanjarkheda, Latur, originally finalized in 1974 under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The scheme had been consented …

NILU SOPANRAO GHULE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Nilu Sopanrao Ghule and Asha Sopan Ghule, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0067/2026, alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR, lodged five days after the alleged incident, disclosed a dispute between the parties and was …

YUSUF GULAB JAKATE AND ANOTHERversusJAMIR AKBAR JAKATE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Yusuf Gulab Jakate and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, Mr. Sanjay N. Gaikwad, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the request and, after taking it on record, ordered the petition to stand disposed of …

ANIL VISHNU SUDRIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Anil Vishnu Sudrik filed writ petition No. 8272 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. After a considerable lapse of time, the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous and requested permission to withdraw it. …

ASHA KIRAN PAWARversusKIRAN SUBHASH PAWAR AND ANOTHER

Rejected at Admission stage

The applicant, Asha Kiran Pawar, filed a miscellaneous application seeking transfer of three pending proceedings – a Hindu Marriage Petition (No.367 of 2023) from Ahmednagar to the Family Court in Beed, and two Criminal Miscellaneous Applications (Nos.185 of 2020 and 125 of 2022) filed under the …

RAVI VYANKATRAO AKULWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra, through its AGP, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw statements recorded in earlier orders of Writ Petition No. 7098 of 2015. The applicant requested that the writ petition be treated as withdrawn, effectively disposing of the matter. The court, after …

DIVYANKA ADESH SINGVI @ DIVYANKA PRAKASHJI KOTHARIversusADESH ASHOK SINGVI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, a mother of nine‑year‑old twins, filed a transfer application seeking to move Marriage Petition No. 1777 of 2026 from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pimpri Chinchwad to the Family Court at Jalgaon. The court noted that the children’s custody is with the mother and that the 450 km …

AJAY S/O. SIDDESHWAR SOMWANSHIversusRESHMA W/O. AJAY SOMWANSHI

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ajay, filed a criminal revision application against his wife Reshma. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel informed the court that the parties had settled their dispute amicably over time. The court noted that, given the settlement, there were no pending issues or matters that …

PRAVIN MAYARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Pravin, was arrested in connection with a large-scale insurance fraud that allegedly involved fabricating the accidental death of Rajendra Jadhav to obtain about ₹1.17 crore from several insurers. The prosecution claims Pravin was the mastermind who coordinated false police, medical …

KHESE SANDIP PANDURANG AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Khese Sandip Pandurang and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 372 of 2020) alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to act on a grievance concerning a transfer that was to be addressed by the Chief Executive Officer. The petition sought relief on the ground that the …