Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 6801–7000

AMOL MAHADEVRAO DHONDREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Amol Mahadevrao Dhondre, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed, prompting the applicant's counsel to seek permission to withdraw the bail application and obtain liberty to file a fresh …

ABHIMAN NARHARIK METRE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging non‑payment of rental compensation ordered by the court. Respondent No.3 filed an affidavit stating that the compensation was deposited on 09‑12‑2013, implying that the petitioners had withdrawn the amount. The court noted that, given the passage of …

KAILAS BABURAO SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad bench) considered applications by Sandeep Khade and Kailas Sonawane seeking suspension of the sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, for conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The applicants argued they were falsely …

PRAKASH SHANKAR AGALEversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Petitioner Prakash Shankar Agale and Dr. Govind Gaurang Roy filed criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. S. B. Kingare and Mr. D. H. Jadhavar, later instructed the court to …

NAJIM KARIM SHAIKH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicants filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case. The applicants, through their counsel, sought to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh …

JEEVAN KARYAPPA BIJJANDA ALIAS B. K. JEEVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Jeevan Karyappa Bijjanda, was arrested on 22‑12‑2024 in connection with a fraud involving the diversion of approximately Rs 1.99 crore from a government department, allegedly facilitated by his wife, an accounts clerk. The prosecution alleged that the applicant received the proceeds …

BALIRAM GORAKHANATH NEMANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Baliram Gorakhanath Nemane, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet against the applicant. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail …

USHA MANGESH BHINGARDIVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Usha Mangesh Bhingardive filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest in a criminal case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. The court, after hearing both parties, expressed reluctance to grant the interim bail relief. …

VILAS S/O. BHASKAR DARADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, convicted by the Sessions Court and released on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, filed a criminal revision challenging the conviction. They argued that the prosecution's case relied on witnesses who turned hostile and that the only remaining evidence was a police …

VILAS S/O. BHASKAR DARADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, convicted by the Sessions Court and released under the Probation of Offenders Act, filed a criminal revision challenging the conviction on the ground that the prosecution's case rested on hostile witnesses and a police report. The prosecution alleged that the applicants formed an …

JAYSHREE NITIN GIDHANEversusVIJAY EKNATH NARWADE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Jayshree Nitin Gidhan applied to vacate or modify an interim order in Writ Petition No.5656/2026, asserting that her appointment as Administrator on 5 June 2026 was in line with the Court’s directions. The original petitioner contended that the appointment violated the High Court’s order dated 26 …

JAYSHREE NITIN GIDHANEversusVIJAY EKNATH NARWADE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Jayshree Nitin Gidhane filed Civil Application No. 9082 of 2026 seeking vacation/modification of an interim order dated 21 July 2026 in Writ Petition No. 5656 of 2026, claiming she had taken charge as Administrator on 5 June 2026 and that her appointment was in accordance with court orders. The …

MANGAL GIRDHAR GUJARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Mangal Girdhara Gujar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0097/2026, alleging assault on an informant. The FIR charges him under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Police Act. The applicant contended that a prior counter‑report and CCTV …

YOGITA HANMANT RONTE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Yogita Hanmant Ronte and another, filed a writ petition seeking a Tribe Validity Certificate recognizing them as members of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior order dated 01.08.2023 in Writ Petition No.9144 of 2023, which had quashed a Scrutiny Committee order …

MADHUKAR WAMAN GAIKWADversusTHE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KALLAMB AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Madhukar Waman Gaikwad filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition. The Court entertained the request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits were considered. The case …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusNARAYAN DAULATRAO MORE

DISMISSED

The State acquired land from Narayan Daulatrao More for extending the Gaothan of Bhopani village, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1996 and awarding compensation at Rs 451 per R. More appealed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, arguing that comparable sale transactions justified a rate …

MOHAN YASHWANT GANGANEversusYASHWANT SIDHAPPA GANGANE

DISPOSED OFF

Mohan Yashwant Gangane filed a writ petition against Yashwant Sidhappa Gangane. The High Court ordered mediation to be conducted at Taluka Ausa, which resulted in a successful compromise deed executed before the Taluka Vidhi Seva Samiti. The mediation report and compromise deed were submitted to the …

GOVIND BABURAO PATILversusTHE EX. ENGINEER, PATBANDHARE PRO., OMERGA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

These appeals and cross-objections arose from a common judgment and award dated 17.01.2014 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga, in Land Acquisition Reference Nos. 279 of 2008 and 278 of 2008. The acquiring body challenged the award, while the claimants filed cross-objections …

R L STEELS AND ENERGY LIMITED.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, R L Steels And Energy Ltd., filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the decree amount of Rs.79,41,114 awarded in a first appeal, together with interest at 14% per annum, which was already deposited with the court. The respondent, New India Assurance Co Ltd., opposed …

Kishor So Devidas GadadeversusThe State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kishor So Devidas Gadade, filed a civil application (No. 9983 of 2026) along with a contempt petition (No. 326 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking an amendment and related relief. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by the Additional …

RAHUL @ KALIDAS ARUN GHOLAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant was convicted for rape (Sec. 376(1) IPC) and related offences including criminal trespass (Sec. 452 IPC) and assault (Secs. 354, 354D, 323, 506, 451 IPC). The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, spot‑panchnama, medical examination reports showing abrasions on the victim and …

NANDKUMAR PANDURANGRAO MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Nandkumar Pandurangrao More filed Contempt Petition No. 34 of 2013 (WP/3561/2012) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through Advocate S. M. Gunjkar, sought relief but later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The learned judges considered the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORSversusCHANDRAKANT ZUMBAR YADAV AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a common Judgment and Award that had enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Lasona Percolation Tank. The acquisition was notified in 1995, but possession was taken in 1992 and the award was made in 1998. Claimants had accepted compensation under protest and …

LAXIMEN BHAUSAHEB PUREKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Laximen B. Purekar filed a writ petition challenging an order that confirmed a Tahsildar's decision based on a spot inspection conducted without his presence. The court examined the panchnama and found that the inspection was carried out behind the petitioner's back, violating the Mamlatdar’s Courts …

SCARIA MATHEW GEEVARGHESE AND ANOTHERversusVAISHALI VISHAL MUNDALE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a special civil suit for specific performance of a land purchase agreement dated 22 March 2019, filed a writ petition alleging that the lower court had only made observations, not a proper order, regarding the impounding of the unregistered sale deed. They …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORSversusMANGALBAI FULCHAND YADAV

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common Judgment and Award dated 11 March 2013 that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Lasona Percolation Tank. The acquisition was notified in 1995, but possession was taken in 1992; the Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed …

MOHD IMRAN HAROONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a civil application filed by Mohd. Imran Haroon seeking permission to produce two government orders dated 31 July 2006 and 23 July 2026 and to amend his writ petition. The court examined the request and, finding no substantive impediment, …

BHAGWAN ONKAR SHRAVANEversusTHE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER I UPTH JALGAON AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division Latur appealed against a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur, which had enhanced compensation for land acquisition up to four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. The appellant argued that the enhancement …

AISHWARYA PRITAM WAGH NEE AISHWARYA SADASHIV SONAWANEversusPRITAM AMAR WAGH

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The wife filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of a family court petition (No. 274/2026) from the Family Court in Thane to the Family Court in Ahilyanagar. The child, aged about five, resides with the mother at Ahilyanagar, and the distance between the two courts is roughly 230 …

AMOL VILAS CHINTAMANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Dhamasagar alias Balu Hiralal Samdura, was charged with cheating a complainant of Rs.13.80 lakh by using his bank account to receive the money, which was subsequently withdrawn. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, together with co‑accused Deokate, orchestrated the fraud, while …

NITIN RAVSAHEB KALUNKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nitin Ravsaheb Kalunke, filed an anticipatory bail application after being arrested. He later informed the court that his arrest rendered the application moot and sought to withdraw it as infructuous. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted a request for permission to withdraw …

ANUPKUMAR KRISHNARAO GHORPADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Anupkumar Krishnarao Ghorpade, a court commissioner, sought quashment of an FIR registered under Sections 354, 354B, 452, 504, 506 IPC and Section 34 read with the IPC, alleging sexual assault and abuse of a lady on 13 January 2020. He claimed the FIR was a false implication aimed at …

Balwant Kour Shankarsingh GadiwaleversusState of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners obtained an heirship certificate for the estate of Shankarsingh Gopalsingh Gadiwale but the certificate omitted the required details of the properties and their valuations, as mandated by the lower court's order. They filed an application before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, …

SURYAKANT GALSHING PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Suryakant Galshing Pawar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not paid rental compensation due to him. The court noted that, given the lapse of time since the petition was filed in 2013, it is presumed that the petitioner has already received the …

PUNLAL SHIVLAL DHANAWATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a contempt petition seeking rental compensation from the State of Maharashtra. The Court observed that, given the passage of time, it could be presumed that the petitioner had already received the compensation. Moreover, the petition had not been circulated since 2013, …

SIDRAM TULSIRAM MASKE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Sidram Tulsiram Maske and others filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and others, alleging non‑compliance with an order for rental compensation. Respondent No.3 submitted an affidavit stating that the compensation was deposited on 9 December 2013, and the court inferred that …

ASHOKKUMAR SHRINAVASARAO KOLGANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ashokkumar Shrinavasarao Kolgani filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction to restrain the self‑proclaimed investigation by Ibrahimpathan Police Station in Krishna district, Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner alleged that the investigation was unauthorized and requested the court to …

SANJAY PUNDLIK BETAWARversusUNION OF INDIA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sanjay Pundlik Betawar, filed Writ Petition No.10238 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Union of India and others. The Court, after hearing the parties, disposed the petition by directing Respondent No.5 to decide the petitioner's …

SHIVAJI SATWAJI BHAGDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants, including the deceased Shivaji Bhagade, were in police custody and, after a complaint that their handcuffs were too tight, allegedly loosened them and fled, assaulting a police constable in the process. They were charged under sections 224 and 353 read with section 34 of the Indian …

SAMBHARAO KAUTIKA HOLPADE AND ORS.versusGANGADHAR S/O. NARYAN NAGARE AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The respondent insurance company had filed a first appeal against a judgment and award of a MAC tribunal, which was later withdrawn on 23 March 2026. Before the withdrawal, the original respondents in that appeal were allowed to amend the names of respondents No. 2 to 6 by an order dated 20 January …

GORAKHNATH RANGNATH YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

Gorakhnath Rangnath Yadav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner sought an adjournment to comply with a prior order dated 17 January 2026. The Court granted a final adjournment, directing the petitioner to file an additional affidavit with documents by 6 …

RAJABAI LAXMAN WAGHMARE.versusM JALPATHRAO AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Rajabai Laxman Waghmare, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the entire amount that the court had directed to be deposited following a first appeal that enhanced her compensation. The enhanced compensation had been deposited by the insurance company on 16 February 2023 …

PRALHAD ASARAM KAKDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Pralhad Asaram Kakde, sought enhancement of compensation for semi‑irrigated land acquired for the Jaipur Percolation Tank, arguing that a settlement reached in a related Lok‑Adalat case (First Appeal No.2834 of 2024) should apply by parity. The original award under Section 4 of the …

SHAKIL KHAJASAB PATELversusPASHA HUSEN PATEL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Shakil Khajasab Patel and others, and Pasha Husen Patel and others, applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal matters arising from a politically charged incident on 24 June 2026 in Nilanga, Latur. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

PRASAD PANDITRAO KAPILEversusSHRUSTI PRASAD KAPILE

DISPOSED OFF

The writ petition (No. 5940 of 2020) was filed by Prasad Panditrao Kapile against Shruti Prasad Kapile in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner sought relief, but later informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Babasaheb V. Dhage, …

NIKHIL PRAVIN PATIL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioners Nikhil Pravin Patil and another applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, in a criminal case against the State of Maharashtra. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought bail, while the State opposed. The Court, after hearing both sides, expressed …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSANJAY DATTATRAY MODWAN

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of Sanjay Dattatray Modwan, a sectional engineer, by the Adhoc District Judge in a special PCA case. The prosecution alleged that Modwan demanded a bribe of Rs 5,000 to sanction a contractor’s pending bill and …

SHAIKH MOHAMMAD SHAIKH ISAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shaikh Mohammad Shaikh Isak was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for an offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two years' imprisonment, while being acquitted of Sections 306 and 304-B. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence …

GANGADHAR KONDIBA DEVAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Gangadhar Kondiba Devare, filed Writ Petition No. 10240 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was presented by Advocate L. H. Kawale, assisted by K. J. Suryawanshi. Respondents were …

KUMAR PRAKASH SATPUTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of his wife and two children, alleging they were taken by Respondent No.4. The court observed that the wife is a major adult and there is no evidence that she or the children were abducted or detained by …

SATISH NARSAYYA AAKENversusSARIKA SATISH AAKEN AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Satish Narsayya Aaken, filed a criminal revision application (No. 132 of 2021) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the applicant, through Advocate A. S. More, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the revision. The court considered whether it has the …

RAHUL BHIKAJI THOKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rahul Bhikaji Thoke, was alleged to have forcibly taken beer bottles from a wine shop and the informant filed a FIR under Sections 308(2), 308(5), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant contended that he had paid the full amount for the bottles via UPI before the …

SACHIN DILIP GHORPADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sachin Dilip Ghorpade was charged under Sections 122 and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 and Section 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 for allegedly possessing a pistol. The applicant sought regular bail, arguing that the co‑accused Shaharukh Sandu Sayyad had already been released …

LAXMIBAI BABURAO SHINDE AND OTHERSversusISHWARI MAHESH SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Laxmibai Baburao Shinde et al., filed a writ petition challenging the trial court’s ‘No Cross’ order dated 19 January 2026 and the ‘Evidence Close’ order dated 26 February 2026 in a partition suit. They argued that the original defendants (female members) and their counsel could not …

KAVITA SHIVAJI KHAIRNAR AND ANOTHERversusANIL PRABHAKAR DESHMUKH AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Kavita Shivaji Khairnar and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioners' counsel argued that the passage of time rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined the claim of delay and …

APPASAHEB RAMRAO SHERKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Appasaheb Ramrao Sherkar and others, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a court order directing that a writ road be widened to a total width of 12 metres (10 metres plus one metre on each side). The court examined photographs submitted by the respondent’s A.G.P., …

SNEHALATA RAMANLAL SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Snehalata Ramanlal Shah, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the petition, counsel informed the Court that the sole petitioner had died. The Court examined whether the …

PRADEEP MOTILAL KULTHE AND ANOTHERversusMANISH SHESHMAL BHANDARI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition (24 WRIT PETITION NO. 3211 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both parties agreed that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether any further hearing was required. Since the parties were ad idem, the court found no …

ASARAM KAMLAJI KALAMKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioners, comprising senior members of a family, sought quash of FIR No. 317 of 2026 filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging offences arising from matrimonial disputes. The complainant, the wife, consented to withdraw the complaint after a settlement …

SHRIKRUSHN ALIAS KAPIL SUDARSHAN DALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Shrikrushn alias Kapil Sudarshan Dalve, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge‑sheet. The applicant sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a …

RAMKISHAN MURLIDHAR NATVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Ramkishan Murlidhar Natve, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh …

GANGASAGAR ABHIMANYU RASKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Gangasagar Abhimanyu Raskar, filed a criminal application seeking quashment of proceedings in Special Case No. 93/2023, which arose from an FIR alleging assault (IPC 323) and intimidation (IPC 504 r/w 34) as well as offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …

DIGAMBAR ANKAT PATIL DECEASED THROUGH LRS PADMABAI AND ORS.versusTHE AREA MANAGER MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION JALGAON, MIDC, JALGAON AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased sought modification of the order dated 22‑08‑2016 passed by this Court and permission to withdraw the award amount in the name of petitioner No. 1/2. The application was heard and the court considered the averments made in the prayer …

SHAINATH KARBHARI GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shainath Karbhari Gaikwad, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to measure his land (Gut No. 99, new Gut No. 30) in Ghusur village, acquire 40 R of it and award compensation. The Court examined whether it could compel the authorities to carry out the …

UMAR HAJI ISMAIL ZIYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest for offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 351, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to an alleged assault with an axe and iron rod on 7 July 2026. The applicant claimed false implication, relying on hotel …

SANJAY APPASAHEB PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant filed a criminal application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 1005 of 2021, which had been dismissed for default on 16 January 2026 after failing to amend the petition as directed by the Apex Court. The application was filed 178 days after the dismissal, and the applicant …