Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 7001–7200

DNYANESHWAR ASHRUBA AVHADversusVAIBHAV VITTHAL AVHAD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1336 of 2026 filed by Vaibhav Ovitth Avhad against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with the pending criminal matter. The Court expressed a disinclination to grant any …

SAUDAGAR SEKU NARWADE (DIED) THRO. LRS. RAHIBAI DIED ABHIMAN DIED THR LRS LAXMI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, heirs of the deceased Saudagar Seku Narwade, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw an amount deposited by the State of Maharashtra in a previous civil suit. The State had deposited the amount pending the outcome of First Appeal No. 3158/2016, which was disposed of …

SADEV @ SAHDEV SHIVRAM KAMBALEversusINDRAJEET SHIVRAM KAMBALE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, original plaintiff in a partition suit, had the suit dismissed for default after failing to lead evidence within the prescribed time. He filed applications for restoration of the suit and framing of issues, which the trial court rejected, citing lack of diligence. The petitioner …

SURESH NANASAHEB KHILARI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Suresh Nanasaheb Khilari and others filed a writ petition challenging the delay by Respondent No.3 in deciding their representation/application dated 08‑08‑2022. The High Court examined whether the respondent had unreasonably delayed the decision. The Court found that the delay warranted …

DEBASHIS AJIT DASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Debashis Ajit Das, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, expressed a disinclination to grant the relief sought. On the instructions of the applicant, counsel sought to withdraw the …

Maruti So Laxman Jagtap died through LRSversusThe Executive Engineer

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a civil application to have the legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.1, Maruti Laxman Jagtap, brought on record in an appeal where the respondent had died on 04‑04‑2025. The applicant submitted a death certificate and a legal heirship certificate. The court examined whether …

MAYUR ASHOK CHAPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTEHRS

DISPOSED OFF

Mayur Ashok Chape filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of respondent No.8, a girl who had gone with the petitioner. The State raised an objection regarding the petitioner's locus to file the petition, but the Court kept the maintainability issue open. The …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusAPPASAHEB SUKHDEV KADAM AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed, which had enhanced compensation awarded to land acquisition claimants. The respondents argued that the enhanced amount did not exceed four times the amount fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. The State …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusAPPASAHEB SUKHDEV KADAM AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed, which had enhanced compensation awarded to land acquisition claimants. The respondents argued that the enhanced compensation did not exceed four times the amount fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. The …

BIPASHA IBRAHIM SHAIKHversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Bipasha Ibrahim Shaikh filed a writ petition challenging Respondent No.3’s failure to decide a representation submitted by her on 13 June 2022. The petitioner claimed the delay infringed her right to a timely decision on her representation. The Court considered whether the administrative …

ASHUTOSH SURESH ZAREversusHARSHADA ASHUTOSH ZARE

DISMISSED

The husband appealed to the Bombay High Court seeking to quash two orders of the Family Court, Dhule, which had enhanced his wife’s maintenance from Rs.3,000 to Rs.7,000 per month under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. and had dismissed his own application for modification. The husband argued that his …

GOVIND SURESH DHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Govind Suresh Dhavan, sought regular bail in a murder case (IPC Sections 302 and 506) for the killing of a woman who had rejected his marriage proposal. The prosecution presented a strong prima facie case, including eyewitness testimony, a recovered knife, forensic blood‑group …

VITTHAL WAMANRAO RASVE AND ORSversusPRABHAKAR MAROTRAO RASVE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Vitthal Wamanrao Rasve and others, filed a civil application seeking recall of a judgment dated 23 June 2026 that dismissed their writ petition on the ground of non‑supply of spare copies. They argued that a common order had been passed which they could not notice, and that the …

JASWANTSING KARANSINH BAYAS AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, former teachers at a government school, claimed arrears of salary and regularisation of their appointments, alleging they had worked from 2009 to 2018 without payment. They sought the court’s direction to compel the respondents to approve their appointments and pay dues. The court …

ISHWAR BABAN CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicants, Ishwar Baban Chavan and others, filed Criminal Application No. 3046 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The applicants' counsel submitted that the applicants had been acquitted by an order dated 04.09.2024 in RCC No. 283/2022. The court noted that, …

KISAN HARI HADWALEversusDivisional Managar

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The applicants, Kisan Hari Hadwale and another, filed a civil application seeking to withdraw the compensation awarded by a tribunal in their favour against HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurance company appealed the tribunal's award, but deposited the awarded amount as directed by the …

VANITA LALU SHETIWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vanita Lalu Shetiwar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that due to subsequent developments, the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as …

ASHUTOSH SURESH ZAREversusHARSHADA ASHUTOSH ZARE

DISMISSED

The husband (applicant) sought to quash a Family Court order that enhanced his wife’s (respondent) maintenance from Rs 3,000 to Rs 7,000 per month under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. The original maintenance of Rs 3,000 each for the wife and elder son was granted by a Judicial Magistrate in 2015 under …

RAJESH VISHWANATHAPPA VALANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, who were either trustees or employees of Shardopasak Shikshan Sanstha, sought quashment of FIRs alleging mis‑appropriation of trust land sold without prior sanction of the Charity Commissioner. Two criminal applications (Nos. 3733/2024 and 3735/2024) were heard together. The Court …

MADOLAYYA SAGAYYA MATHPATI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, who are members and former trustees of Shardopasak Shikshan Sanstha, sought quashment of FIR No. 278/2023 alleging mis‑appropriation of trust land sold without prior permission of the Charity Commissioner. The petition raised that the 1992 resolution authorising the sale of plots was …

RAJU CHOKHAJI SALVE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The original accused filed an application seeking quashing of FIR No. 0345 of 2023 and the related criminal proceeding (R.C.C. No. 76 of 2025) for offences under Sections 324, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the accused and the State jointly submitted that the dispute …

SANJAY SOPANRAO KENDREversusSHOBHA LAXMIKANTRAO GANJEWAR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The respondents filed a special civil suit seeking declaration of ownership, recovery of possession and perpetual injunction over two plots, alleging that the petitioner had encroached their land. During the trial, the respondents applied under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC for the appointment of a …

AFZAL ALIAS AFZALKHA ANWAKHA PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Afzal Alias Afzalkha Anwakha Pathan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a lack of inclination to grant the relief sought. Consequently, counsel for the applicant requested …

SHAHARUKH SANDU SAYYADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) considered the bail application of Shaharukh Sandu Sayyad, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 0289 of 2026 for offences under Sections 122 and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 and Section 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The …

SHIVAJI RANJI DALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shivraj Dalve was arrested on 7 July 2026 during a police combing operation after a pistol and an empty magazine were recovered from his possession. He was charged under Sections 3/25 and 7/25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 for illegal possession and attempted sale of an unlicensed firearm. The …

SAGAR SHRAWAN BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, Sagar Shrawan Bhosale, sought to withdraw his pending bail application after being re-arrested following a non-bailable warrant. The earlier bail application had been rejected because charges were not yet framed, with liberty to file a fresh application once charges were framed. The …

DNYANESHWAR BHUJANG AVHADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Bhujang Avhad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a police case alleging assault with an iron rod and several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR described an incident on 25 June 2026 where the applicant and co‑accused allegedly assaulted the …

SOMNATH DAMODHAR SONJE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Somnath Damodhar Sonje and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 469 of 2012) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel submitted that they had complied with the earlier contempt order. The court examined the compliance submission and found no remaining issues to …

PRANALI VASANT AVHADversusSAROJINI BALWANT TARGE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Pranali filed writ petitions (Nos. 3509/2014 and 3510/2014) along with a civil application in 2014‑2015 against respondents Sarojini and others. The petitioner, through counsel, argued that the considerable passage of time had rendered the petitions infructuous. The Court examined whether …

KALPANA SUPADU GAIKWAD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who are primary and secondary education officers employed by the Zilla Parishad, filed writ petitions alleging denial of salary benefits under the one‑step pay scale applicable to employees working in Tribal and PESA areas. They sought verification of their service records and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusANANDA PATILBA TUPE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti‑Corruption Bureau, charged Ananda Patilba Tupe, a senior clerk, with demanding a Rs 1,000 bribe to restore a dismissed file. The ACB set up a trap, recording a pre‑trap verification and a main trap, but the conversation was not recorded. The complainant and …

NEHA KALPESH PATILversusKALPESH SOMNATH PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

In a family court appeal filed by Neha Kalpesh Patil against Kalpesh Somnath Patil, the matter was referred to mediation during pendency. The mediator submitted a report dated 11‑08‑2026 confirming a successful mediation and provided the compromise terms agreed by both parties. The court verified …

MUNJA VAIJENATH NIRDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Munja Vaijenath Nirde and Pandurang Bhagwat Nirde, challenged caste certificates issued to them that listed their community as “Mahadev Koli” instead of the prescribed “Koli Mahadev” and were not in the statutory Form C format under the Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of …

PANDURANG BHAGWAT NIRDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Munja Vaijenath Nirde and Pandurang Bhagwat Nirde, challenged caste certificates issued to them that listed their community as “Mahadev Koli” instead of the prescribed “Koli Mahadev” and were not in the statutory Form C format under the Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of …

NITIN BALAJI ADBEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nitin Balaji Adbe, filed a writ petition challenging notices issued by the State of Maharashtra demanding submission of a Tribe Validity Certificate, threatening adverse action if not produced. The petitioner argued that the claim before the Committee had been pending since 2017 and …

RAHUL SOMAJI WAGHMAREversusASHLESHA RAHUL WAGHMARE

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant filed a criminal revision application after a delay of 260 days, seeking condonation of the delay. The applicant produced receipts of deposit in the Family Court, which were taken on record. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to condoning the delay and also waived service of …

ASHOK CHANDRABHAN KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ashok Chandrabhai Kale filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of habeas corpus for his son, who was reported missing. The petitioner alleged that his son was detained against his will, but the missing complaint filed with the police did not allege any abduction. The Court …

DNYANOBA BAPURAO JAGTAP AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to pay rental compensation ordered on 03/11/2015. The respondents, through their Advocate General, submitted that the compensation order had already been issued and that directions for payment had been given …

BHAU ABA SUDREIK AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard several writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits from the State of Maharashtra. Relying on its earlier decision in Writ Petition No.15662/2025, the Court held that petitioners are entitled to the difference …

SANDIP SAKHARAM BACHKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sandip Sakharam Bachkar, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1205 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After filing, the petitioner, through counsel Jagtap Adinath B., requested permission to withdraw the petition, …

RAJSHRI RAJKUMAR DESHMUKHversusNANDKUMAR RAJRAM KISANRAO SARAF AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajshri Rajkumar Deshmukh, filed Writ Petition No. 1436 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court examined whether the …

JANARDHAN JAGANNATH SATPUTE AND ANOTHERversusPANDIT BABURAO SONAWANE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners Janardhan Jagannath Satpute and another filed Writ Petition No. 6173 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Pandit Baburao Sonawane. The petitioners' counsel argued that the matter had already been decided in RCS No.463/2015, and therefore no …

VALMIK JAIRAM KAJALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 11465 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the petition was filed, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of …

RAJKUMAR EKNATH SHINDE AND OTHERSversusGAJANAN NAMDEO SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought relief concerning mutation entries in land records, alleging that the entries conferred ownership rights. The respondents contended that mutation entries are merely fiscal records and do not establish title. The High Court reiterated settled law that mutation entries serve …

KALYAN SHIVAJIRAO LOMATEversusPRASHANT CHANDRAKANT SHINDE

Transfer to other court

The applicant filed a petition seeking leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, …

THIMMAYA HIMMAYA GUNJALKARversusJUNED ABDUL HAKIM AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Thimmaya Himmaya Gunjalkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the substantive suit that formed the basis of the petition was disposed of by the trial court. The …

KALU BABASAHEB MUNJALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, owner of a tractor seized by police after his son allegedly used it to run over two officials during a sand‑theft investigation, filed a criminal revision under CrPC s. 397 challenging the Additional Sessions Judge’s refusal to grant interim custody of the vehicle under BNSS s. 501. …

PRAVIN KACHRULAL PARAKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, four relatives of the husband in a matrimonial dispute, were named in an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498-A, 504, 506 and 34. They moved the High Court under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of the FIR, contending that the allegations were vague, general and …

RAVINDRA UKHDU SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ravindra Ukhdu Salve, filed a contempt petition (Cont. Petition No. 512 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and found that there was no …

SAYED MUJAHID SAYED FAROOQUEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, Sayed Mujahid Sayed Farooque, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Food Safety and Standards Act after a police raid seized contraband gutka worth Rs. 14,02,405 from his premises. He argued that he had already been granted …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERversusIBRAHIM NAZIR KOTWAL

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga, which had, on reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhanced compensation for land acquired for earthquake rehabilitation by fixing a market value of Rs.30 per square metre. The …

RAVINDRA RAJARAM WAGHversusBHAGYASHRI BHIMRAO BADADE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ravindra Rajaram Wagh, filed a writ petition in 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over the years, the petitioner failed to appear for any hearing, including on 7 April 2026 when the court noted his absence. The court observed that the petition had been pending for …

ARJUN ASHOKKUMAR BHUTDA AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Arjun Ashokkumar Bhutda and others, filed a writ petition seeking compensation, three times the market value of the land (TDR), and the RCC structure for land acquired by the corporation. The respondents (Corporation) contended that the petitioners' residential construction was …

SANKET MANOJ JATWEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sanket Manoj Jatwe, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed against him. The applicant sought to withdraw the bail application and indicated his intention to file a fresh application before …

VIKAS SHARAD GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Vikas Sharad Gaikwad applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the bail application, the prosecution filed a charge-sheet, prompting the applicant's counsel to seek withdrawal of the bail petition and to file a fresh application before the trial court …

SANDU SAKHARAM BHUJANGversusCHANDRAMUNI BHIKAJI MULE AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

The appellant, Sandu Sakharm Bhujang, filed an appeal against Order No. 4 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant informed the court that the appellant wished to withdraw the appeal. The court examined whether a pending appeal could be …

ABDUL QUADEER ABDUL HAEEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits after their superannuation. The petitioners argued that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the annual …

MAROTI BAPU DEVKAR DIED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRSversusTHE STAE OF MAHARASHTRA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants, legal heirs of a deceased landowner, sought to withdraw a portion of the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body under a court-awarded award. The High Court had earlier ordered the acquiring body to deposit the full compensation with interest, and the claimants now applied …

PRATAP DIGABAR BANDGARversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR DHARASHIV AND OTEHRS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, owner of a Hyva truck bearing registration MH‑24‑AU‑4654, was authorized by an E.T.P. to transport sand on 3 June 2026. Due to punctured rear tyres, the vehicle could not reach the destination within the permitted time and was seized by the anti‑mining squad near the unloading point. …

SUNIL BALAJI ATNUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

This first appeal challenged the Reference Court's judgment and award dated 03.05.2019 in L.A.R. No. 385 of 2012, seeking enhancement of compensation for an acquired house property in village Itgyal, Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded, acquired for the Lendi project. The notification under Section 4 was …

Beed Zilla Nyayalayin Karmachari SangatanaversusState of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The Beed Zilla Nyayalayin Karmachari Sangatana filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking a directive for respondent No.3 to decide a pending proposal that had been forwarded by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Beed (respondent No.6) on 8 November 2021. The petitioners …

NISHANT ZAREEN ABDUL HAFEEZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Dr. Nishat Zareen Abdul Hafeez, challenged specific clauses (4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.7) of a Government Resolution dated 7 August 2012. The High Court noted that the same resolution had already been examined in Writ Petition No. 6549/2026, where the court upheld the validity of those …

SHAIKH JAKIR SHAIKH SAGIRversusAAFIYA KHAZI NAFE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Aafiya Khazi Nafe filed a criminal writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel G.S. Kalve, later filed a withdrawal petition stating she no longer wished to pursue the matter and had already approached the Chief Judicial …

PRAMOD ZUMBAR BHAILUMEversusThe Executive Engineer Kukadi Prakalp Vibhag Shrigonda

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants sought to withdraw their share of the amount deposited by the acquiring body, which had only deposited 13% of the 50% amount previously directed by the court. The High Court noted that in a similar case it had permitted claimants to withdraw the deposited 13% without any conditions. …

ARUN SHAMRAV MHASKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction from the High Court to register an FIR based on a complaint dated 20 September 2021. The petitioners failed to address objections raised by the office and did not provide necessary instructions to their counsel, showing negligence in …

ARBAJ KHAN JAMIR KHAN PATHANversusTHE EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Arbaj Khan Jamir Khan Pathan filed a writ petition challenging the Head Master’s order rejecting his request to correct his school record caste designation from “Muslim Waghwale” to “Muslim”. The petitioner argued that under Regulation 26.4 of the Secondary School Code, 1997, the Head Master was …

PREMALA ALIAS SUMAN VILAS KULARNIversusVILAS MADHUKARRO KULKARNI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Premala alias Suman Vilas Kularni filed an application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing a petition for restoration of an appeal and requested that the appeal be returned to its original position. The Court examined the application and heard the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Sharad Shinde. …

RAJESH CHANDRAMAL GALANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajesh Chandramal Galani, sought a measurement of a sub‑division of City Survey No. 3550/B/1. The respondent (the municipal authority) refused, stating that a joint owner’s "no objection" letter was required for the measurement. The High Court examined whether the lack of such …

NITIN MANOHAR SHINDEversusASHOKRAO SHANKARRAO KALE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a former trustee of the Congress Bhavan Trust, challenged the approval of a change report that renamed the trust to Shri Saibaba Trust, alleging procedural violations and that the change was impermissible under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The respondent trustees argued …

KADUBAI NIVRUTI AALATversusASHA SANDIPAN AALAT AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Kadubai filed Writ Petition No. 9464 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against respondents Asha and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the submission that the …

SAKHARAM RAMA JADHAVversusMANJARA SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Sakharam Rama Jadhav, filed a civil application and writ petition against Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana. The matter was heard by Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court considered the relief sought in prayer clause (B) of the …

GANESHGIR JIVANGIR GOSAVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Akash Atmaram Dhangar applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court expressed disinclination to grant bail and the applicant, on his counsel's advice, sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application after one year if the trial …

MAHESH BHAUSAHEB JATADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Mahesh Bhausaheb Jatade filed a criminal revision application. The order dated 10/09/2026 erroneously stated that the revision was disposed, whereas only prayer clause (C) was allowed. The applicant sought deletion of the erroneous paragraph and addition of specific clauses, including issuance of …

PANKAJ YESHWANT KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ravindra Waman Koli, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking liberty pending the filing of a charge-sheet, which he anticipated within 90 days (by 29-08-2026). The applicant's counsel indicated a disinclination to argue the merits at that stage and …

SHAHRUKH SATTAR SAYYEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered two regular bail applications filed by Arbaz Mazher Khan and Shahrukh Sattar Sayyed, who were charged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 4/25 of the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act for an assault that occurred …

LAXIMAN KASHINATH SABLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Laximan Kashinath Sable, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to implement a communication dated 27 July 2021 issued by the Residential Deputy Collector, Ahmednagar, concerning a complaint of alleged breach of Covid Protocol by public representatives of Kopargaon …

KISAN NAMDEO WAIKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Kisan Namdeo Waikar filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the compensation amount deposited by the State of Maharashtra in the reference court after a stay of execution was granted. The court permitted the claimant to withdraw 50% of the amount upon furnishing a standard undertaking, an …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMOHASIN SHAIKH PATEL AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The National Insurance Company appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held it and the vehicle owner jointly liable to pay Rs.80,000 plus interest for a road accident that occurred on 3 May 2008. The insurer argued that its policy, shown to be effective only from 14 Jan 2007 to 13 Jan …

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMOHASIN SHAIKH PATEL AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held it jointly liable with the vehicle owner to pay Rs. 80,000 to the claimants. The insurer argued that its policy, dated 14‑01‑2007 to 13‑01‑2008, was not in force on the accident date of 03‑05‑2008, and …

RUSHIKESH UTTAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Rushikesh Uttam Patil, was arrested on 17 July 2026 in connection with a large seizure of liquor valued at Rs. four crore from the premises of Hari Om Fiber Pvt. Ltd. The prosecution alleges that Patil owned the premises, permitted a co‑accused to use it, and was to receive proceeds …

RAJSHRI DIGAMBAR CHALWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Rajshri, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an offence under Section 105 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 arising from a domestic altercation that led to her husband's death. The prosecution alleged that after a quarrel, the …

SHANKAR SHRIDHAR RAUT AND ANOTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The Court examined the …

ASIF MAGDUM PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Asif Magdum Pathan sought correction of his caste entry in a school record from ‘Chaparband’ to ‘Muslim’. After leaving the school, the headmaster forwarded his correction proposal to the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2), who rejected it on the ground that the petitioner was no longer …

PRAMILA SHIVAJIRAO YELLULWADversusSHIVAJIRAO ARJUNRAO YELLULWAD

DISMISSED

The appellant, Pramila Shivajirao Yellulwad, filed a family court appeal and two civil applications against her husband, Shivajirao Arjunrao Yellulwad. The respondent's counsel had offered to provide the appellant's address, but the court issued notice based solely on the address supplied by the …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

PRADEEP TUKARAM KOKADWARversusTHE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER

Transfer to other court

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of Section …

BASAVRAJ HAVANNA SAMANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant was convicted under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code in 2018 and his appeal was dismissed in 2021. During the pendency of the revision, the complainant and the applicant settled their dispute, with the complainant filing an affidavit stating no grievance and agreeing to a …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

DEVIDAS SADASHIV SOMDHANEversusANKUSH RAMDEV SOMDHANE AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Ankush Ramdev Somdhane, sought regular bail in a murder case (Crime No.488/2025) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant conspired with four assailants, maintained contact via multiple phone calls, and had …

N. RAJSHEKHARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

N. Rajshekhar filed Criminal Revision Application No. 196 of 2017 and a related Criminal Application No. 1312 of 2018 against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Bench, after considering the request, …

PRAYAGABAI BANSI NAVTHAR AND ANOTHERversusVASANT SHANKAR JOSHI

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Prayagabai Bansi Navthar and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later informed the court that, due to the passage of time, their prayers no longer survived for consideration and they wished to withdraw the petition. The petitioners' counsel, …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that …

DNYANESHWAR BHAUSAHEB GAGAREversusRAMJAN ISMAIL SHAIKH AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Bhausaheb Gagare, filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MACP No.11/2008) for compensation, but it was dismissed for non‑prosecution after he could not attend proceedings due to his appointment as a legal officer. He later obtained a certified copy of the dismissal order …