Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 7401–7600

CHAYABHAI SUBHASH BHADANGEversusHARI SHRIRANG MALI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Chayabhai Subhash Bhadange, sought permission to withdraw an amount that the accused had deposited pursuant to a court order dated 02/04/2026 directing the accused to deposit 25% of compensation. The accused complied and deposited the amount with the court. The applicant argued that …

AARTI NAMDEO GAWALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Aarti Namdeo Gawali, filed a writ petition seeking relief because a prior order dated 20 July 2026 directing a Committee to decide her claim within one month had not yet resulted in a judgment. The petitioner feared that the limited protection granted by the court would lapse before …

THE STATE OF MAH THR COLLECTOR AND ORSversusREVA MAHATRYA GAVIT

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against the judgment and award dated 23 November 2007 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nandurbar in LAR No. 252/2005. The appeal challenged the amount of compensation awarded to Reva Mahatrya Gavit, …

THE STATE OF MAH THR COLLECTOR AND ORSversusREVA MAHATRYA GAVIT

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against the judgment and award dated 23 November 2007 in LAR No. 252/2005. The court allowed the application and condoned the delay. The appeal challenged the compensation awarded, contending that the reference …

DNYANESHWAR DINKAR BADVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioner, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment, a fine of Rs.10,000 and compensation of Rs.3,50,000 with interest, filed a revision seeking condonation of a 184‑day delay, suspension of the sentence and bail. The High …

HARINATH SANGRAMAPPA KALPEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in his writ petition against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The High Court examined the application and ordered that the delay be condoned, subject to a deposit of Rs.3,000 with the Advocates’ …

HARINATH SANGRAMAPPA KALPEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing his writ petition (WPST/37633/2025) against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and the writ petition restored. The Court ordered that the delay …

HARINATH SANGRAMAPPA KALPEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Harinath Sangramappa Kalpe, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in a writ petition (WPST/37632/2025) against the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Nanded. The application argued that the delay was justified and requested the court to allow the writ petition to proceed. …

HABIB UR REHMAN MALANI AND ORS.versusNAIMULLAH KHAN S/O. AMANULLAH KHAN AND ORS..

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Habib ur Rehman Malani and others, filed a first appeal (No. 526/2026) against a temporary injunction order issued in the lower court. They sought to have the appeal heard at the admission stage and also applied for the production of certain documents. The respondents opposed the …

MAHADEO RAMA BARLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Mahadeo Rama Barle, the land‑loser, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the entire amount that the acquiring body had deposited in the court after the High Court stayed execution of a compensation award. The applicant argued that earlier orders dated 5 December 2025 and 10 December 2025 …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Rahul Suresh, convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(f)(k)(n) (rape), 452 (kidnapping) and 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. The victim, his first cousin, alleged forced sexual relations, blackmail with a video, and injuries corroborated by …

GORAKH POPAT BHAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Gorakh Bhawal applied for anticipatory bail in a cyber fraud case where an informant was deceived into transferring Rs. 1.10 crore via WhatsApp messages allegedly sent from a number impersonating a factory chairman. The FIR named unknown persons, but the prosecution relied on witness statements that …

AKHIL SURESH GUPTAversusTHE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Akhil Suresh Gupta, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of the Divisional Commissioner and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rahul I. Dusuriya, on behalf of the petitioner, moved the court seeking to withdraw the petition. …

BASANTI RAMESH SULANEversusTHE DISTRICT SUPERITENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Basanti Ramesh Sulane, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the addition of offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act to Crime No. 225/2023 registered at Sillegaon Police Station. The petition also requested an adjournment. The Court …

SUKHDEV NAMDEV PATILversusCHINTAMAN NAMDEV PATIL DIED LRS UTTAM AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioner filed Civil Application No. 13130 of 2016 seeking to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondent on record, requesting condonation of a 473‑day delay. The court examined whether such a delay could be condoned under procedural law. Finding the reasons for delay satisfactory, the …

GANGABAI TIMMA MARWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a series of first appeals filed by numerous claimants against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents concerning compensation for fruit‑bearing trees affected by land acquisition. The parties, represented by counsel, …

BABU KOETYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a large group of first appeals filed by various private claimants against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for fruit‑bearing trees acquired under a land acquisition project. The claimants sought enhancement …

ANIKET VISHNU MUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Aniket Vishnu Munde, sought regular bail for murder charges under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the death of Balu, the informant's son, at a hospital owned by Dr. Pramod. The prosecution alleged that Munde, a nephew of Dr. Pramod, …

ANIL S/O GOPALRAO GHADGEversusUSHA W/O ANIL GHADGE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Anil Gopalrao Ghadge filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 67‑day delay in filing his Family Court Appeal (Stamp No. 8469 of 2026) and the setting aside of an order dated 05.05.2026 that refused registration of the appeal due to office objections. The applicant undertook to remove all …

SHRIRANG GOVINDRAO BIRAJDARversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISMISSED

The appellant, Shrirang Govindrao Birajdar, appealed against a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga which, on reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, enhanced the market value of his acquired land to Rs.533 per Are after applying a 60% deduction to a sale price …

JIJABHAU TUKARAM SHINDEversusDEELIP VITHALRAO GADGE

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Jijabhau Tukaram Shinde, filed a civil revision seeking condonation of an eight‑day delay in filing the revision. The delay was not alleged to be deliberate. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted an affidavit supporting the request. The court examined the application and, …

BABURAOL MANIKRAO JANGAPALLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants and cross‑objection petitioners challenged the award dated 11‑June‑2010 of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur, which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Tambat‑Sangvi Storage Tank Project. The parties submitted that the controversy was identical to that …

GAJANAN SHANKARRAO JOSHIversusVASANT SHANKARRAO JOSHI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Gajanan Joshi, had filed Writ Petition No.3068 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. On counsel’s instructions, he sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a comprehensive application before the same Court. The Court examined its …

KESARSINGH DHANSINGH JARWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Kesarsingh Dhansingh Jarwal, filed an anticipatory bail application but was found to have suppressed his criminal antecedents. The court, noting this suppression, was reluctant to entertain the application and the applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw it and refile after …

VINOD MARUTI GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Vinod Maruti Gaikwad filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The applicant was represented by Mr. N. B. Narwade, assisted by Mr. R. V. Gore. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed …

VAIJINATH DATTARAM BYAGALWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vaijinath Dattaram Byagalwar claimed membership in the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated his claim on 10 July 2018 after a Vigilance Cell report was submitted on 3 July 2018, but the petitioner was not provided a copy of the report nor an opportunity to file …

SANJAY TUKARAM LOKHANDE AND OTHERSversusBAPU KISAN LOKHANDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who purchased the entire 6‑9‑R land in two halves, sought to overturn an order that allowed the respondents to restrain excavation for a water tank despite an earlier temporary injunction in the petitioners' favor. The petitioners argued that their registered sale deeds gave them …

KIRAN UTTAM POLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Kiran Uttam Pole, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigation concluded and a charge sheet was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a …

SAMADHAN DINKAR KOLI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Samadhan Dinkar Koli and Laxman Ishwar Koli, were implicated in an assault case (Crime No. 0384/2026) where the witness Kalpesh suffered a simple head injury allegedly caused by a stick. Applicant No. 1 withdrew his anticipatory bail application, leading to its dismissal. Applicant …

DR DADASAHEB HANUMATRAO DHAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Several doctors filed writ petitions (Nos. 11919 of 2021, 2933, 3056, 3057 of 2019) challenging orders of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through counsel M. P. Kale, sought to withdraw one petition and later argued that the remaining petitions were fully covered by a prior judgment of …

ASHOK NANA RAVATEversusGORAKHNATH SONAJI SONABA RAVATE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ashok Nana Ravate filed a writ petition (No. 12315 of 2017) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of Gorakhnath Sonaji Sonaba Ravate and others. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Nitin T. Tribhuwan. The respondents were represented by Advocates Sudarshana …

SHAIKH ARBAJ FAROOQUEversusTHE EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner sought correction of his primary school record, but the headmaster of the school rejected the application. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the rejection. The Court examined Regulation 26.4 of the Secondary School Code, 1977, which obliges a headmaster to forward such …

Manager United India Insurance Co LtdversusShantabai Vitthal Pawar and others

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Manager of United India Insurance Co Ltd filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 49‑day delay in filing an appeal against a judgment and award dated 21‑April‑2025 passed by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation. The insurer argued that the delay was caused by the time taken to …

RAJKUMAR GOVINDRAO BODAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a large group of writ petitions (numbers 904‑931) that raised the issue of whether Medical Officers are entitled to engage in private practice and receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the matter had already been decided in a …

KUSUM JITENDRA CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The applicant, Kusum Jitendra Chaudhari (alias Kusum Dattatray Patil), filed three criminal applications and accompanying revision applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After a hearing during which the Court expressed reluctance to entertain the matters, the applicant’s …

RIYA RAJU KADAMversusTHE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Riya Raju Kadam, filed a writ petition challenging the respondents' refusal to declare her NEET-UG 2026 result, arguing that she was not named as an accused in the CBI charge sheet and had already appeared for the Re‑NEET‑UG examination. The court examined whether there was any legal …

GOVIND ALASING PAWAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants' land of 2 hectares 85 R, acquired in 1997 for the Palaiguda Brahad Minor Irrigation Project, contained numerous fruit‑bearing trees, teak trees and a well. They claimed compensation of Rs 21,08,746, relying on two sale instances (Exh. 58 and Exh. 59) to argue for a higher per‑hectare …

SHAKER SAHEBJAN SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shaker Sahebjan Shaikh filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representation dated 04‑08‑2026. The petition sought a directive for the respondent to consider the representation in accordance with the …

ALKABAI ANANDA BHOLE AND ANOTHERversusMRUNALI SACHIN BHOLE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 5th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalgaon, which had refused to reject the plaint in Special Civil Suit No. 186 of 2025 under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. They alleged that the first defendant was not the legal wife of the …

SHAIKH SALEEM SHAIKH CHANDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a quo warranto against Respondent No.6, who was appointed to a position in a private college. The Court examined whether the office in question qualified as a public office, which is a prerequisite for a quo warranto proceeding. Relying on the Supreme …

CHANDRAVADAN LAKHAMICHAND GUJARATHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court considered several writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be recalculated to include the annual increment in their last drawn salary and that they were entitled to arrears from the …

SACHIN LAHU CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sachin Lahu Chavan, filed an application under Section 483 of the BNSS seeking relaxation of a bail condition that barred him from entering the village of Poi Tanda until trial concluded. The original bail order dated 26‑03‑2024 imposed this restriction. Counsel argued that the …

MOHAMMED WAJED MOHAMMED AYYUBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Mohammed Wajed Mohammed Ayyub, sought the court's permission to withdraw his writ petition while retaining the liberty to raise the same grounds before the appropriate authority. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Sayyed Tauseef Yaseem and Mr. Mohammad Aseem, made the application. The …

BHIMA VITTHAL KARDILE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants, Bhima Vitthal Kardile and another, filed a bail application before this Court. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency completed its investigation and filed a charge sheet. The applicants' counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and …

VIMALBAI LAXMAN PATILversusLAXMAN SHENPADU PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vimalbai, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, Laxman, objected to the maintainability of the petition. In response, the petitioner sought leave from the Court to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to initiate …

RAJU MANSINGH RATHOD AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Raju Mansingh Rathod, Sanjay Harishchandra Phoke and Sachin Gabru Rathod in connection with two FIRs alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust …

RAMSING LAKHESING GIRASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Ramsing Lakhansing Girase filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of Respondent No.2 to decide his representation dated 29 July 2025. The petition raised the issue of undue delay in adjudicating the representation, seeking a directive …

KIRAN ARJUN VALAVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Two anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 1601 and 1625 of 2026) were filed before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by Kiran Arjun Valavi and Dnyaneshwari Harishchandra Ghuge respectively, seeking protection from arrest. Both the applicants' counsel appeared and indicated that the Court was …

SHIV RAMRAKSHA YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Chaudhari N. L., filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigation concluded and a charge sheet was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a …

HABIB UR REHMAN MALANI AND ORS.versusNAIMULLAH KHAN S/O. AMANULLAH KHAN AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Habib ur Rehman Malani and others, filed a first appeal (No. 526/2026) against a temporary injunction order issued in the lower court. They sought to have the appeal heard at the admission stage and also applied for the production of certain documents. The respondents opposed the …

MACCHINDRA LAKSHMAN KHESEversusBHASKER BHANUDAS KHESE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit, alleging that the suit had not been settled. The respondent argued that the parties had already compromised the suit before the Lok Adalat, rendering the petition moot. The court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication. …

MADHAV KUNDALIK WAYCHAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Madhav Kundalik Waychal and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners had submitted proposals on 02/01/2024 and 29/06/2026 that remained pending. The Court, after hearing …

SUKHDEO PIRAJI THOMBAREversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Sukhdeo Piraji Thombare, filed a civil application seeking restoration of his writ petition (No. 8761 of 2021) after it was dismissed pursuant to a conditional order dated 5 May 2026. The application was filed 34 days after the dismissal, raising the issue of whether the delay could …

TUKARAM DNYANOBA KACHGUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Tukaram Dnyanoba Kachgunde applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged assault on informant Ashok on 28 June 2026, for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant claimed the applicant sat on his chest and throttled him, while co‑accused used iron …

MADHAV ASHOK SALUNKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Madhav Ashok Salunkhe, filed a bail application which was pending when the charge-sheet was filed. He sought to withdraw the bail application and request permission to file a fresh bail application together with the charge-sheet before the trial court. The court allowed the withdrawal …

ASAF SARVARKHA PATHAN AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Asaf Sarvarkha Pathan and another filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the respondent authority regarding a proposal forwarded by the Headmaster of Zilla Parishad, Bhogalwadi. The High Court examined the applicability of the precedent set in Janabai Himmatrao Thakur vs. …

RAMCHANDRA S/O. DEVRAO CHORGHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ramchandra filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1271 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. M. R. Achar and Mr. Laxmikant R. Tade, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The …

SAYYAD APRIN AYUBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sayyad Aprin Ayub, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Dean (Respondent No.3) to grant him educational leave for pursuing an M.Sc. in Nursing from 2026 to 2028. The petitioner had already obtained all necessary no‑objection permissions and secured admission at S.M.B.T. …

AMOL BHIMASHANKAR KUMAWATversusDINYAR NAVROJ JALNAWALA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Amol Bhimashankar Kumawat filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the Principal District Judge, Jalna. The petitioner argued that the relief sought was still required. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that a …

HARUN SAMADSAB SHAIKHversusTHE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant filed a civil application seeking to amend an existing writ petition by adding eight original judgment debtors as parties, alleging they were inadvertently omitted. The court examined whether such an amendment could be permitted under procedural rules. It held that the amendment was …

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDINESH BALIRAM AHIRRAO AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Cholamandalam General Insurance Co., appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held the owners and insurers of two trucks jointly and severally liable for compensation arising from a crash. The appellant argued that liability should be divided between the two vehicle owners …

CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDINESH BALIRAM AHIRRAO AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Cholamandalam General Insurance Co., appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held both owners and insurers of two trucks involved in an accident jointly and severally liable for compensation. The appellant argued that liability should be divided between the two owners and …

NARESH CHINANNA SHANKRODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, challenged the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee’s order that invalidated their ST certificates on the ground that they failed to prove caste affiliation, affinity, and that school records showed alleged overwriting of the …

RAJESH CHINANNA SHANKRODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, members of the Mannervarlu community, challenged the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee’s order that invalidated their caste certificates on the ground that they failed to prove tribal affiliation and that school records showed alleged overwriting of the tribe …

MONIKA SATISH THAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Transfer to other court

Monika and Chetan Thakur, brother‑sister, applied to the Maharashtra Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee for a Thakur Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificate. Their father and grandfather’s school records listed the caste as Hindu‑Thakur, and four siblings had earlier been granted ST certificates. The …

JITENDRA RAMLINGAPPA AMBEKARversusARUNA JITENDRA AMBEKAR

DISPOSED OFF

Jitendra filed a writ petition against his wife Aruna. During the pendency of the petition, the related civil suit (H.M.P. No.70/2014) before the Civil Court, Nanded was fully disposed. The respondent’s counsel placed the civil court’s judgment on record. The High Court observed that with the …

SANDIP SATISH PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Executive Engineer of the Sina Kolegaon Project appealed against a judgment and award dated 13‑08‑2014 concerning land acquisition in Paranda, while the original claimants filed a cross‑objection (Stamp No. 5955/2017). Both parties submitted that the dispute was identical to that decided in FA …

SATISH BHAGWAT PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Executive Engineer of the Sina Kolegaon Project appealed against a 2014 award concerning land acquisition, while the original claimants filed a cross‑objection. Both sides agreed that the dispute was identical to that decided in FA No. 3147/2017 (MKVDC Through Ex. Engineer v. Jagdish Patil). The …

GIMLIBAI BAMNYA RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Gimlibai Bamnya Raut applied for anticipatory bail in a murder case (Crime No. 65 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleges that Mahendra, a mentally ill man, entered her house, assaulted her with a stick, and that she and family members later tied …

ANIL S/O BHAWARLAL JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Anil Jain, filed Criminal Application No. 5665 of 2014 and No. 899 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The applicant's counsel submitted that the causes of action in both applications had become infructuous and there was no need for the matters to …

YATISH SACHDEVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Yatish Sachdev, sought the Court’s permission to travel to Melbourne for business from 29‑08‑2026 to 04‑09‑2026, invoking a condition in an earlier interim protection order that required court approval for any foreign travel. The State opposed, alleging the travel could facilitate …

SANTOSH JIVANRAO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Santosh Jivanrao Shinde filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a reluctance to grant any relief. On instructions, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw …

SUNIL SAKHARAM MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sunil Sakharm More, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner submitted representations on 26 May, 5 June, and 10 June 2026, which the respondent had not acted upon. The Court examined whether the respondent was …

RAHUL DEVIDAS KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant Rahul s/o Devidas Kale filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court noted that the trial had substantially progressed, with only two witnesses remaining to be examined, as per the report from the District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, …

AHMEDNAGAR MAHANAGAR PALIKA THROUGH COMMISSIONERversusLATA RAMESH SADAFALE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, filed a writ petition seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the cause of action had become infructuous. The court accepted this statement. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous. No further orders were …

HARI JANGLU KUMBHAR AND OTHERSversusJAYANT HARESHWAR OAK AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a civil application (No.9752 of 2026) arising out of writ petition No.8331 of 2015 filed by Hari Janglu Kumbhar and others against Jayant Hareshwar Oak and others. The applicants sought relief under prayer clause (B) of the petition. The Court, after …

VAIBHAV ANANT CHEMTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Vaibhav Anant Chemte filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a lack of inclination to grant the relief sought. Consequently, the applicant's counsel, on instructions, moved to withdraw the …

GAURAV BHIKAJI ATHAVALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing both sides, the court expressed reluctance to grant relief. The applicant's counsel, on instructions, sought to withdraw the application. The court accepted the withdrawal. …

PRITEE FULJEE KOKANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay heard three anticipatory bail applications filed by police personnel accused of misappropriating Rs. 47.6 lakh of government funds transferred to their accounts through a digital salary processing system. The applicants claimed they were unaware of the illegality, …