Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 7601–7800
The petitioners, members of the Shankrod family, challenged a judgment of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee that invalidated their caste certificates on the ground that they failed to prove belonging to the Mannervarlu tribe. The Committee relied on school records showing …
The applicant, whose land was acquired, sought compensation under the same award that listed the petitioners. The petitioners had been ordered to withdraw Rs.21,35,347, and the applicant's entitlement was undisputed. Although the applicant was not a petitioner in the related writ petition, the court …
The claimants filed three civil applications seeking the withdrawal of an amount that had been deposited by the Acquiring Body following a stay order dated 21 February 2025. The Court had previously stayed the withdrawal pending the deposit of 50% of the amount. The claimants now requested the …
The applicant, Aniket Dayanand Jadhav, filed a bail application while his criminal investigation was ongoing. During the pendency of the bail application, the investigation concluded and a charge sheet was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file …
The claimants, legal representatives of deceased persons, filed civil applications seeking the withdrawal of an amount that had been deposited by the Acquiring Body following a court-ordered stay dated 21 February 2025. The High Court had earlier stayed the withdrawal pending the deposit of 50% of …
The claimants filed three civil applications seeking the withdrawal of an amount that had been deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to an order dated 21 February 2025, which the court had stayed subject to a 50% deposit. The court examined whether the claimants were entitled to retrieve the …
The petitioner challenged the grant and confirmation of a temporary injunction in Civil Suit No.64 of 2023, filed by the respondents, arguing that the suit was frivolous and the injunction should be set aside. The injunction was originally granted on the basis of prima facie case, balance of …
The petitioner, Sidhhesh Raju Iste, who is incarcerated, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash the refusal of parole leave for his own marriage. He relied on an earlier order (Criminal Writ Petition No. 794 of 2026) where the Court had granted parole on humanitarian grounds despite the …
The applicants, Mahadeo Annappa Badure and others, filed a civil application seeking to bring the legal heirs and representatives of applicant No.5 onto the record, condoning a delay of 1,576 days and setting aside an abatement that had been effected. The delay arose because the death of applicant …
The petitioners filed several civil applications challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the filings were delayed and, after hearing, condoned the delay, restored the petitions to their original positions and allowed the civil applications. The petitioners then …
The petitioner, Pawan Devidas Adhane, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, expressed a disinclination to grant the relief sought. Consequently, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the application …
Shivaji Shaikshanik Pratishthan, through its President, filed writ petition No. 10888 of 2026 before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through Advocate Sandesh R. Patil, later sought leave of the Court to withdraw …
The High Court considered three anticipatory bail applications arising from an assault case registered as Crime No. 179/2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The first applicant, Gaurav Deshmukh, withdrew his application, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The remaining applicants, Bhavesh Sunil …
Shaikh Mujahid Abdul Majid and others filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief, including police protection, against the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that identical prayers had already been addressed in Criminal Public Interest Litigation No. 15 of 2022, where it had directed the …
The petitioner, Pranita Babanrao Nikalje, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding a representation dated 16 July 2024 submitted to Respondent No.2. The High Court examined whether the authority was obligated to adjudicate the representation promptly and on its merits. The Court found …
Vishal Prabhakaro Deshmukh filed a criminal writ petition (No. 752 of 2026) alleging that Respondent No. 11 fraudulently sold land that had been acquired by the Government, misrepresenting its boundaries. The High Court had earlier dismissed the petition on the ground that the dispute was civil in …
The petitioners, former government employees, challenged the calculation of their pension benefits, arguing that they were denied the annual increment and appropriate arrears. The High Court examined earlier orders of its coordinate benches in Writ Petitions No. 5445 of 2026, No. 3412 of 2026, and …
The petitioners, Dhanraj Virshhetti Biradar and others, filed a criminal application seeking relief under prayer clause‑B of their writ petition. The High Court, after considering the reasons set out in the application, allowed the application and directed that the required amendment be made within …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for approximately 7,880 candidates after finding that their mark sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had the statutory …
The applicant, Dnyaneswar alias Akash Bhagwanrao Banayat, filed a bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous and there was nothing left for consideration. The respondent's counsel was present but …
The applicant's land was compulsorily acquired and he received compensation that he deemed inadequate. He approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. The acquiring body appealed the enhancement and deposited the entire award amount …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment that had enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Benitura Medium Project in Turgaon village, Osmanabad district. The claimants’ land, originally valued at Rs.14,000 per hectare, was awarded Rs.40,000 per acre by the Reference Court, which the …
The applicant wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 171/2026 from the Civil Judge Senior Division, Shirur to the Family Court at Ahilyanagar, citing a criminal case and domestic‑violence application pending in …
The High Court considered several civil applications filed in 2011 and 2026 relating to a stay of execution, condonation of delay in filing an appeal, and the late inclusion of legal representatives on record. The application for a stay of execution (Civil Application No.15023/2011) was deemed …
The petitioners filed a writ petition after their appeal was rejected by the Appellate Grievance Redressal Committee. The High Court noted that a State Grievance Redressal Committee had been constituted by a government resolution dated 31 July 2026, which is the appropriate forum for the petitioners …
The applicant, Fulchand Somnath Giri, had his land acquired by the Acquiring Body under compulsory acquisition and was awarded compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer. Dissatisfied with the award, he approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the …
Christchan Primary School, Latur, filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra's delay in deciding on a proposal forwarded by the Education Officer on 26‑08‑2025, where the school was listed at serial No.10. The petitioners sought a judicial direction for the State to act on the …
The wife, Rachana Wo Subhod Ukey, applied to transfer a marriage petition (No. A/86/2026) from the Family Court in Aurangabad to the Family Court in Ahilyanagar, arguing that the husband resides in Ahilyanagar and that their three‑year‑old child is in her custody. The husband opposed, claiming he is …
During the pendency of a first appeal, one of the appellants, Gurunath (son of Raghunath Jadhav), died. The surviving parties filed an application to be impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased appellant. The applicants submitted a copy of an heirship certificate issued by the Joint Civil …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a compensation award of Rs 40,000 per acre for irrigated land acquired for the Benitura Medium Project, arguing that the award was excessive. The claimants, whose 2.5‑hectare land was acquired, contended that similar cases decided by this Court had set …
The petitioners, Polachand Ambarsingh Rajput and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Nattu Sandu Landage. Both sides were represented by counsel, with the petitioners' advocates being S. D. Tele and Shivprasad G. Jadhavar, and the respondent's …
The State of Maharashtra appealed to reduce compensation awarded to claimants whose lands were acquired for the Benitura Medium Project under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The claimants argued that, like a previous case (First Appeal No.765 of 2007), their irrigated lands should …
The applicant, Pandit Kalyan Giri, had his land compulsorily acquired by the State of Maharashtra and was awarded compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer. Unsatisfied with the award, he approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the State Council of Examinations and the Commissioner had statutory authority under the …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 36‑day delay in filing a review petition, and the court allowed the condonation despite the respondents not appearing. The review petition raised several issues: that the partition suit filed by the respondent was barred by limitation …
The applicant's land was compulsorily acquired and he was awarded compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer. Unsatisfied with the award, he approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. The acquiring body appealed the enhancement and …
The applicant's land was compulsorily acquired and he received compensation that he deemed inadequate. He approached the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which enhanced the compensation. The acquiring body appealed the enhancement and, as directed by this Court, …
The applicant, Ramesh Baliram Palve, filed a civil application seeking to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded to him by a tribunal in an insurance claim against Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd (now IndusInd General Insurance Co Ltd). The insurer appealed the tribunal's award but had …
The petitioners, Parbhani Education Society, filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Assistant Charity Commissioner regarding the operation of their school. They sought a direction to allow the appointed Headmaster, Khaleeque Ur Rehman Khan, to continue running the school while the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the annual …
The applicant sought restoration of Criminal Application No.3443/2023, which had been dismissed for failure to pay costs of Rs.1500 by the deadline of 06/07/2026. The court had earlier condoned a 140‑day delay in filing the revision, subject to that payment, and later extended the deadline by one …
The appellant, original defendant No.2, appealed against the District Judge's order rejecting his application to condone a 244‑day delay in filing an appeal against a 2019 decree. He claimed the delay was due to a heart attack and bypass surgery on 12 June 2019, followed by prolonged …
The petitioner, Vikas, sought a writ to quash the Education Officer's order rejecting approval of his appointment as Assistant Teacher at Tirupati Vidyalaya, a school run by Jay Bhawani Shikshan Sanstha. The school had initially advertised a vacancy for a Scheduled Tribe (ST) post twice in 2016 …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
The applicants, DWARKABAI SANJAY MANKAR and family, sought to withdraw the compensation amount that had been awarded by a tribunal in their favour and subsequently deposited by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). MSRTC appealed, objecting to the amount awarded, but had already …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two anticipatory bail applications filed by Kiran Arjun Valavi and Dnyaneshwari Harishchandra Ghuge against the State of Maharashtra. After arguments, the applicants, on their counsel's instructions, sought to withdraw both applications. The Court, …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
The appellant's land in Wahegaon Sopara, Jalna district was acquired for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with an initial compensation of Rs.1,545 per R, later enhanced to Rs.3,500 per R by a Reference Court. The appellant challenged this award, arguing that a prior First …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The applicant, Om Sanjay Mahajan, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1624 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection against arrest in a criminal proceeding instituted by the State of Maharashtra. The court heard arguments from both sides, with Mr. Datta A. …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
A group of petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11961, 11990, 11991, 12015, 12028, 12030, 12037, 12068 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, through their counsel, they submitted written instructions on 6 July 2026 seeking to …
The claimants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of a portion of an amount that had been deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to a court order dated 26‑09‑2024, which required 75% of the award amount with interest to be deposited within 12 weeks. The Court allowed the claimants to …
In a regular civil suit for a perpetual injunction, the plaintiff gave his examination‑in‑chief in English but faced cross‑examination in Hindi and Marathi. Being a Bengali who is not fluent in the local language, he applied to the trial court for permission to engage a qualified translator to …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates. The Court noted that the issues raised were already decided in Writ Petition …
Deepak Balasaheb Tupe, convicted under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for assault with a sword, applied for suspension of his five‑year sentence and bail pending an appeal. He argued that he was only a secondary accused, that the sword was not recovered, and that the FIR was lodged three …
A batch of writ petitions filed by retired government employees sought the inclusion of a notional annual increment in their retirement benefits, arguing that they had served at least six months in the relevant year. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) …
The petitioners alleged that the respondents had obstructed the natural flow of a government nala adjoining their land and sought relief under Sections 4 and 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906. The Mamlatdar ordered the respondents to clear the nala, but the respondents challenged this order …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained two civil applications filed alongside a first appeal. The first application sought condonation of a nine‑day delay in filing the first appeal; the Court, finding no deliberate delay, allowed the application and condoned the delay. The second …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a nine‑day delay in filing a First Appeal, arguing that the delay was not deliberate. The respondent’s counsel appeared and waived service of notice. The court examined the application, found no mala fide intent, and in the interest of …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking to withdraw the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a motor accident case. The insurance company, as appellant, challenged the tribunal's award and appealed to the High Court. The Court examined the tribunal’s endorsement of …
The petitioners, Ramesh Uttam Hinge and others, filed writ petitions seeking liberty to file fresh applications in two execution proceedings that had been stayed because a first appeal by the State Government was pending. The State Government’s first appeal was subsequently dismissed. The …
The appellant, an acquiring body, challenged a 2008 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired in 1991 for a 33 kV sub‑station. The claimants had originally sought Rs 15 per sq ft but were awarded Rs 10 per sq ft, which the Reference Court later enhanced to Rs 6 per sq ft. The appellant …
The appellant, the legal heirs of the deceased Gopinath Narayan Dhoble, appealed against the State of Maharashtra challenging the compensation awarded for land acquired under a public purpose. The appeal arose from a 2013 award in Land Acquisition Reference No.1497 of 2012. The appellant argued that …
The Ex. Engineer NMC Aurangabad (applicant) filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals, withdrawal of a monetary amount, and a stay of proceedings against the respondents, including a minor under guardianship. The court examined the explanations provided for the …
The Ex. Engineer NMC Aurangabad (applicant) filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals, withdrawal of a monetary amount, and a stay of proceedings against the respondents, including a minor under guardianship. The court examined the explanations provided for the …
The Ex. Engineer NMC Aurangabad (applicant) filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals, withdrawal of a monetary amount, and a stay of proceedings against the respondents, including a minor under guardianship. The court examined the explanations provided for the …
The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste student admitted to a B.D.S. program, had not yet produced a caste validity certificate, with her claim pending before a scrutiny committee. She sought permission to appear for the first‑year examination scheduled for 19‑09‑2026 and requested the committee decide …
The petitioner Nazeer Ahmed filed Writ Petition No.10490/2015 seeking relief related to Civil Applications Nos.5600/2023 and 3749/2024. The Court examined the prayer clauses B and C of the applications and ordered that they be allowed, directing the parties to effect any necessary amendment within …
The petitioner, Avinash Pawar, filed a criminal revision application against his wife, Deepali Pawar. The trial court had earlier dismissed the matter for want of prosecution because the petitioner's advocate was repeatedly absent. The High Court restored the case to give the advocate another …
Ketan Lahu Phapale filed a bail application (No. 1729 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail, after which the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court granted the leave, resulting in the bail …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court for land acquired for a storage tank, arguing that the court had unjustifiably deducted 70-80% of the sale consideration based on a prior sale exemplar. They contended that the land was not for residential development and …
The appellant's land in Wahegaon Sopara, Jalna district was acquired under a 2008 notification for a percolation tank, with an initial compensation award of Rs.1,460‑1,545 per R in 2011. The appellant challenged this award, and the Reference Court raised compensation to Rs.3,500 per R. The appellant …
The appellant's land in Wahegaon Sopara, Jalna district was acquired under a 2008 notification of the Land Acquisition Act for a percolation tank. The Civil Judge awarded Rs.1,545 per R, which was increased to Rs.3,500 per R by a Reference Court under Section 18. The appellant argued that, because a …
Ashru Babu Walekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in consideration of his representation submitted to the State of Maharashtra. The petition noted that the representation was forwarded by Respondent No.4 to Respondent No.7 on 24 August …
The Acquiring Body filed a first appeal against a land acquisition award. During the appeal, respondent No.1‑F, Padmin Dashrath Jogdand, died, prompting a civil application to amend the appeal’s title clause to insert his legal representatives and delete his name. Similar applications were filed to …
The State Government issued resolutions on 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 disqualifying Alfalaha Welfare Education Society from receiving grant‑in‑aid and ordering the closure of its primary, secondary and higher secondary schools without providing a hearing. The Society challenged these resolutions …
The appellant's land in Wahegaon Sopara, Jalna district was acquired under a 2008 notification for a percolation tank, with an initial compensation of Rs.1,460 per R fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. The appellant challenged this assessment, and a reference court raised the compensation to …
Seven appellants challenged a common judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation of Rs.585 per Are for land acquired for a Yestar Storage Tank, based on a sale exemplar of Rs.5,000 per Are but after a 70‑80% deduction. The appellants argued the deduction was unjust and …
The petitioners, Bhagyashri Yogendra Shisode and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of respondents Nos.3 and 4 in deciding their representation dated 12 June 2025. They sought a direction that the decision be made in accordance with Government …
The applicant, Lahu Gitaram Phapale, was charged with multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an alleged assault and robbery of an informant on 23.12.2024. The applicant contended that the FIR was the result of an old dispute and that the injuries mentioned in the FIR …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking permission to join the legal heirs of appellant No. 2 to the record and to condone the delay in filing the application, requesting that any abatement be set aside. The counsel learned after the court’s earlier order that appellant No. 2 had died, …
The petitioners, two accused convicted under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, were sentenced to three years' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25,000 each by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Beed, a sentence later confirmed by the Sessions Court. After surrendering, the second …
The petitioners, represented by Mr. M. M. Parghane on behalf of Mr. Pratik P. Kothari, sought an adjournment of their criminal writ petition. The State of Maharashtra was represented by Mrs. M. L. Sangit, while no counsel appeared for Respondent No. 2. The court noted that the office objections to …
The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased Prabhawati Narayanrao Chaudhari, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. They requested that the respondent verify the land record and consider their application dated 24 February 2026, which had been recommended on 28 July …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from Crime No. 303 of 2026, registered at Bhoom Police Station, involving a dispute over hoisting a blue flag over a saffron flag which led to stone‑pelting by a mob of over 200 persons and injuries …
The petitioner, aged 57, filed a writ petition seeking correction of his date of birth in his SSC Board Certificate, having joined service in 1999. The petition was filed at the fag end of his service. The Court noted the settled legal position that corrections to birth dates cannot be entertained …
The petitioner, Subhash R. Agrawal, challenged a 14 October 2024 order by the State of Maharashtra that remitted a revision application concerning Mutation Entry No. 2534 (dated 1 June 1989) back to the Sub‑Divisional Officer, despite a 24‑year delay. The petitioner argued that under Section 257 of …
Vishwas Balasaheb Deshmukh filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in deciding his representation dated 25 November 2025 filed with the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought a directive for the concerned government department (Respondent No.2) …
The petitioner, Gautam Manik Kamble, filed a writ petition challenging the failure of Respondent No.2 to decide a representation he submitted on 11 November 2025. The petitioner alleged that the delay violated his right to a timely decision under government policy and rules. The High Court examined …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Baswaraj Raikawade, filed a civil application (No. 9963 of 2026) and writ petition (No. 6843 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, against the Union of India and other respondents. The matter was listed before a two‑judge bench comprising Justice Nitin B. …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision application seeking condonation of delay, but the High Court expressed disinclination to entertain it. The petitioners then requested permission to withdraw the revision. The Court disposed of the revision application as withdrawn and consequently dismissed …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prafull Shravan Gaikwad in connection with FIR No. 0493 of 2026 alleging threats, extortion and an alleged outraging of modesty under Sections 132, 74, 308(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant …
Ajay Madhukar Sonavane applied to the High Court of Bombay seeking to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The tribunal had affirmed the applicant’s entitlement after considering the rival contentions. The court examined …
The applicant, Neeraj Mohan Agrawal, filed a civil application seeking to set aside the Registrar's order dated 28 April 2026 which refused registration of his Family Court Appeal (Stamp No. 7096 of 2026) on the ground of pending office objections. The court considered the applicant's undertaking to …
The applicants were convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class for cheating and preparing false documents (IPC §§ 420, 468, 471 read with §34) in a property dispute and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment with a fine. They appealed, but the Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal, …
The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher who was acting as In‑charge Headmaster in a Zilla Parishad school, was disciplined for allegedly failing to inform authorities that a colleague, Assistant Teacher Gurav, had been detained for more than 48 hours under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, …
The applicant, Keshavrao Deorao Patil, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the amount in dispute had already been withdrawn by the applicant. …
The petitioner, Kiran Dilip Mutkule, challenged a communication dated 08 July 2025 that rejected his appointment as Lab Assistant in a school, relying on a Government Resolution dated 4 April 2025. The petition argued that his appointment, made on 10 March 2024, preceded the resolution and therefore …
The petitioner filed Criminal Application No. 3340/2022 seeking condonation of delay. The Court observed that no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It warned that if no representation is made on the next date, the application would be dismissed. Consequently, the Court dismissed …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a group of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking monetary benefits and pensionary arrears. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated by including the annual increment in their last drawn salary and that …
The petitioners, Amol Sunil Kshirsagar and another, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge confirming a stay order in Special Civil Suit No. 25 of 2021. They sought a direction that the trial court should not allow any third‑party interest and should decide the suit within …
The petitioner, Shaikh Sattar Rashid, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a decision on his representation dated 26 November 2025. The petition was filed against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court examined whether Respondent No. 3 had unreasonably …
The applicant, a permanently disabled 30% injured plaintiff, sought compensation from a tribunal but received a modest award. Due to his ill health and the misplacement of his case file during a lawyer's office relocation, he was unable to file the first appeal within the prescribed limitation …
The plaintiff, Shivaji Govind Ekale, was 13 years old when he executed a sale deed of the suit property. The defendants, Hanmant Madhavrao Deshmukh and others, argued that the plaintiff had not challenged the deed within the limitation period and had enjoyed possession for decades, implying the deed …
The appellants challenged a lower court judgment that had upheld a sale deed executed when the plaintiff was only 13 years old. The trial and appellate courts found that the sale was procured by fraud and that the suit was filed within the statutory limitation period. The High Court examined whether …
The applicant, Kusum Jitendra Chaudhari, filed three criminal applications and corresponding revision applications against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. After a hearing, the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the matters. The bench, noting its earlier reluctance to …
The petitioner, Tausif Ahamed Wajed Hussain, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief regarding representations he submitted on 11 August 2026 and 13 August 2026. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and …
Janardhan Nivrutti Dake filed a writ petition (No. 9621 of 2014) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner argued that the passage of time had rendered the issues in the petition infructuous. The court examined the claim and considered whether the petition …
Anil Ramnath Davle filed a criminal writ petition seeking police protection, a decision on his earlier representations, and the addition of a fifth respondent as an accused with specific IPC sections in FIR No. 505 of 2023. The Court observed that a charge sheet has already been filed and the …
The petitioner, a grandson of a land‑acquisition awardee, obtained a Project Affected Person (PAP) certificate after his uncle could not utilise it due to age. The Deputy Collector later cancelled the certificate, alleging that two other persons from the family had already received daily‑wage …
The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe candidate, filed a writ petition challenging a Government Resolution dated 2 July 2026 that extended the deadline for submitting caste validity certificates by six months only for SEBC and OBC candidates, alleging discrimination against SC and ST candidates. The …
The applicant, Nilesh Sunil Pendurkar, was convicted by an Additional Sessions Judge in Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving a three‑month imprisonment and a fine, which has been paid. An appeal (Criminal Appeal No.703 of 2026) was filed, and the …
The petitioners, legal representatives of the late Shamlal Shriniwas Agrawal, filed a civil application seeking to be brought on record after the petitioner's death on 12 June 2026. The application invoked prayer clause‑B, requesting the court to recognize the representatives and allow the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking direction for the trial court to expedite the pending civil suit R.C.S. No. 971 of 2018, which had been in litigation since 2021. Both parties acknowledged that the suit had reached the evidence stage. The High Court, noting the prolonged pendency, …
The petitioners, heirs of a deceased Inamdar, sought a grant of Virasat for an Inam property but filed the application 42 years after the death of the Inamdar. Their application for condonation of delay was rejected by the Divisional Commissioner with a one‑line order lacking reasons. The …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking recall of the High Court’s order dated 20 July 2026 which had dismissed their petition. The application argued that the dismissal order should be set aside. The Court examined the request and, without citing any statutory provisions or precedents, …
The petitioners, Shrikant Satishrao Salunke and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18‑08‑2023 passed by the Returning Officer and seeking inclusion of 33 members in the final voters list. During the pendency, the election was declared, prompting the petitioners to amend their …
The applicant, Naim Shaha Usman Shaha, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a theft case (CR No. 447/2026) alleged to have occurred on 7 July 2026 in a temple. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a statement of a co-accused, which the applicant’s counsel argued is …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a review petition challenging the trial court’s order dated 16.07.2026, which did not award interest on arrears. The applicant argued that the earlier order dated 18.08.2016 in Writ Petition No. 11892 of 2015, which …
The petitioners sought to recall an earlier order dated 24.07.2024 that dismissed their writ petition against respondent No.1, arguing that they could not serve notice due to an unknown change of address. They requested permission to serve respondent No.1 by publishing a notice in a newspaper under …
Petitioners Vinod Jadhav, Mahesh Patil and Shailaja Thombare filed writ petitions challenging the State of Maharashtra's denial of their right to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance to medical officers. The High Court had earlier decided the matter in a common judgment dated …
The petitioner, Kusum Jitendra Chaudhari, filed three criminal applications and corresponding revision applications against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. After a hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought leave of the court to withdraw all pending matters. The bench, noting …
The appellant filed Civil Application No. 9597 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 502‑day delay in filing an application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that the delay was unjustified. The court examined the …
The legal heirs of the deceased Gangadhar filed a death claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, alleging that a tractor collided with his motorcycle, causing his death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held United India Insurance Co. Ltd. jointly and severally liable with the owner and …
The appellants were convicted under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC for assaulting the complainant with sticks, causing injuries to his back, knee and eye. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s testimony, two independent eye‑witnesses (PW7 and PW8), and a medical expert’s injury …
The petitioners, Appasaheb Karbhari Kasar (through his attorney) and Changdeo s/o Karbhari Kasar, filed writ petitions (Nos. 673 of 2016 and 12497 of 2015) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court issued an order on 02‑04‑2026. The petitioners sought a correction to the cause title …
Gajanan Bhausaheb Gore was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 2 September 2024. The school’s proposal for approval of his appointment, submitted on 29 April 2025, was rejected by the Education Officer on the ground that a Government Resolution dated 4 April 2025, issued by the School Education and …
The applicant, Ganesh Chhagan Munne, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet against the applicant. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the FIR that led to prosecution and eventual acquittal of the accused. The respondents, represented by Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, argued that the acquittal rendered the petition moot. The court observed that the order of acquittal dated …
The petitioner, Sambhaji Prakash Suryawanshi, challenged an order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that rejected his claim to belong to the Koli Mahadev (29) Scheduled Tribe on the basis of alleged fabricated documents. He argued that his first cousin, Shrikant Sanjay …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions filed by subject teachers challenging Clause 3 of a Government Circular dated 13‑10‑2016. Relying on the coordinate bench decision in Ganesh Mahadeo Asekar v. State of Maharashtra (W.P. No. 5563/2022), the Court held that the …
Krishnaprasad Bhanudas Gore filed a review application challenging the High Court's order dated 15 July 2025 that his writ petition (No. 5936/2024) was withdrawn on his instructions. The petitioner argued that the court had committed an error apparent on the face of the record in disposing of the …
The petitioner, claiming to be the husband of a missing adult woman, filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking her production before the court, alleging that her brother and family abducted her and forced her to lodge a false FIR under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner presented a marriage …
Manohar Arjun Parkhe filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised concerns regarding the Collector's failure to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 19 January 2026 and 20 March 2026. The Court …
The State of Maharashtra acquired 40 Ares of land in Shiradhon village for a percolation tank. The Special Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation at Rs.78,000 per hectare for 30 Ares and Rs.1,500 per hectare for 10 Ares, which the claimant challenged before a Reference Court. The Reference …
Prof. Dr. Subhash Gaybu Landge filed a writ petition (No. 11696 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petitioner sought a decision on a representation he submitted on 23 April 2026. The court examined the petition and …
The appeal was filed by Rajendra Kundlik Nikam challenging a lower court decree granting both prohibitory and mandatory injunctions against him for constructing on Plot No. 55, which belongs to Feroz Musamiya Maniyar. The appellant argued that no measurement had been done and that his own plot (No. …
The petitioners, a school, sought reimbursement of fees for the 25 % of students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The petition raised the question of whether the school was entitled to such reimbursement and what procedure the authorities must follow. …
The petitioners, former government employees, filed writ petitions seeking the difference in their pensionary benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not accounted for the annual increment in their last drawn salary. The Court examined the earlier decision in Writ …
The appellant, Rajendra Kundlik Nikam, appealed a judgment that granted a mandatory and prohibitory injunction to the respondent, Feroz Musamiya Maniyar, ordering the appellant to cease construction and demolish a building on Plot No. 55. The appellant argued that no surveyor measurement had been …
The petitioners, employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, filed a writ petition seeking the application of the Eksthar (one-step) pay‑scale as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They argued that a coordinate bench of the same High Court had already allowed similar petitions in Writ …
Petitioner Pankaj Uttamrao Ranveer filed a writ petition (21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9975 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition had been delayed, and the State moved to dismiss it on that ground. The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered whether the delay …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the investigation of a crime. The Superintendent of Police issued an order on 22 April 2026 transferring the investigation to the E.W.O. Wing, Ahilyanagar. The court observed that this transfer fulfilled the petitioners' purpose for filing …
The Competent Authority of National Highway No. 6 and the Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General), Dhule filed a civil application against Nilesh Dattatray Marathe and others seeking payment of compensation under the land acquisition proceedings. The respondents contested the amount and the …
Ekta Education and Welfare Society, a minority institution, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to consider and decide its proposal for an additional division in its junior college at Ahilyanagar. The petitioner claimed that although the Education Officer had …
The petitioners, Satish Rupchand Jain and another, filed a writ petition which, according to their counsel, became infructuous. The learned advocate informed the court of this development. The bench, after noting the petition's infructuous status, ordered its disposal. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioner, Sachin Shubhamangalrao Kale, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding his representation dated 08 September 2025. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. The Court observed that the representation had not been adjudicated and …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra, alleging that the authorities had acted unlawfully. The Court observed that the petitioners have an alternate and efficacious remedy under Clause 5 of a Government Resolution dated 07/12/2021, which allows them to …
The petitioner, a judgment debtor, filed a writ petition challenging a civil court order that rejected his application under Section 2 of the Partition Act, 1893, seeking relief from execution of a decree that would require removal of walls and cause damage to the property. He argued that executing …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against an award of compensation for land acquired for the construction of a ring road at Ambajogai. The acquisition was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 1992, with the award passed in 1994, while possession had been taken earlier. …
The appellant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., filed a letter of authority to withdraw its appeal in the First Appeal No. 4016 of 2016 before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court, Aurangabad. The appellant asserted that the award amount, along with accrued interest, had already …
Seema Raviraj Ambhure filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner had submitted a representation dated 05-08-2026, which remained pending. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to …
The applicant, Laxmikant Anilrao Joshi, filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions Court in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium …
Govind Madhavrao Chaudhari and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra’s failure to consider their representations dated 1 October 2024 and 3 August 2026. They contended that the State’s inaction violated their right to a fair …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 745 of 2012) before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, but subsequently filed a withdrawal petition along with an authority letter. The court, upon receipt of the withdrawal, disposed of the appeal and any …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, while numerous claimants appealed for enhanced compensation and interest. The issues centered on whether the lands were dry or semi‑irrigated, the adequacy of the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of writ petitions filed by retired government employees of Maharashtra seeking monetary benefits and arrears of pension. The petitioners contended that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the …
The High Court of Bombay heard three anticipatory bail applications filed by police personnel accused of misappropriating Rs. 47.6 lakh of government funds transferred to their accounts through a digital salary processing system. The applicants claimed they were unaware of the illegality, …
The petitioners, Rukminbai Govindrao Bhatte and others, filed a writ petition (No. 3039 of 2017) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondent, Govindrao Madhavrao Mahadu Bhatte. The petition was filed in 2017 but was only heard on 2 February 2026. During the …
The petitioner, Laxmibai Venkatrao Dhoble, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Education Officer to decide a representation she submitted on 16 June 2026. The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, opposed the petition, relying on a circular dated 13 November 2025 which …
Jyoti Dayalsing Thakur filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner alleged that his grievance could not be addressed by the court and sought a direction for redress. The Court examined whether the grievance fell within the …
The petitioner, Sahaji Balasaheb Irkar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application, and the court, after hearing counsel for both sides, expressed a disinclination to grant …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 47‑day delay in filing their second appeal and, in a separate application, a stay of execution of a judgment dated 12‑09‑2022. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found them neither deliberate nor intentional, deeming …
Ashok Girdharlal Khandelwal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, on 17 April 2026, warned that failure to appear on the next date would result in dismissal for want of prosecution. The petitioner did not appear on the scheduled date of 8 May 2026, …
The High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a bail application (No. 1813 of 2026) filed by Krushna Arun Shingare against the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the earlier order dated 1st October 2026 mistakenly referred to the proceeding as a "CRIMINAL APPLICATION". The judge directed that the …
The petitioners, a group of former government employees, filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. The Court examined whether the pension should be computed on the basis of the actual last drawn salary, including the annual increment, and …
The petitioner, Suchita Kailash Navtakke, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 08.08.2026 passed by Respondent No.2. The Court noted that the petitioner has an alternate statutory remedy under the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024, which establishes a Grievance Redressal Committee. …
The High Court considered several writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pensionary benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of their actual last drawn salary, including the annual increment, …
The appellants, agricultural landowners in Siregaon, challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired in 1995 for the Shillegaon Minor Irrigation Project, arguing that the land and fruit‑bearing trees were undervalued. The Civil Judge had partially enhanced compensation under Section 18 of the …
The petitioners filed several writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee (Respondent No. 2) that demanded explanations for why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The State’s Additional Government Pleader argued that an …
The petitioner, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 15 days' imprisonment, filed a criminal revision which led to a non‑bailable warrant and his arrest on 31 July 2023. He was remanded to judicial custody until 14 August 2023, but was not produced before …
Subhash Motiram Aade and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the State of Maharashtra's respondent No.8 to consider their representations dated 14 July 2025 and 23 March 2026. The petitioners contended that the non‑consideration …
The petitioners challenged show‑cause notices issued by a committee (respondent No. 2) that sought reasons why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The State argued that an amendment to the governing statute, effective from 23 July 2026, vested …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee, which asked them to explain why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The State, through its Attorney‑General, contended that an amendment to the …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee (respondent No. 2) that sought explanations for why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The State, through its Additional Government Pleaders, …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by the Committee (Respondent No. 2) that sought reasons why their cases should not be reopened. The Committee relied on a statutory amendment dated 22 July 2026, which purported to give it power to review its own …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee (respondent No. 2) that sought reasons why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The respondents argued that an amendment to the governing statute, …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee, which sought explanations as to why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July 2026 and 6 August 2026. The State, through its Attorney‑General, contended that an amendment to …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by a committee (respondent No. 2) that questioned why their cases should not be reopened. The notices were dated 30 July and 6 August 2026. The State’s Attorney‑General argued that an amendment to the governing …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging show‑cause notices issued by the Committee (respondent No. 2) that demanded explanations for why their cases should not be reopened. The Committee relied on an amendment to the governing statute, effective 23 July 2026, which vested it with …
The petitioners sought modification of a 26‑Nov‑2014 order that allowed them to withdraw a sum subject to a bank guarantee of 25% of the amount. They argued that furnishing such a guarantee was onerous and impeded withdrawal of the balance. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed dilution …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Hausabai Babasaheb Birangal, filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against two judgments of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amalner, which had partially allowed Section 18 references under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and fixed compensation for land acquired for the Shirpur‑Raver Road at Rs.15 per square foot. The …
The petitioner, Disha Agro Industries, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a final assessment order dated 24-08-2023, alleging it was illegal, arbitrary, and violated natural justice. The order in question was a communication from the Deputy Executive Engineer of Maharashtra …
The appellant Bhima Tulshiram Thakare appealed against the Special Land Acquisition Officer and another regarding a 2010 award in a land acquisition matter for minor irrigation works. The court noted that the issues were already decided in a coordinate bench judgment dated 8 January 2026 in First …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against two judgments of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amalner, which had partially allowed Section 18 references under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and fixed compensation for land acquired for the Shirpur‑Raver Road at Rs.15 per square foot. The …
The applicant, Dayanand Namdeo Kamble, a supervisor for the erection of a distribution pole, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a death of a laborer who came into contact with a live electric wire. The FIR alleged that the death occurred despite a permit being obtained for the work, and the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court order to restart the TB Sanatorium Hospital run by the Indian Red Cross Society in Ahmednagar and to decide service benefit claims of ex‑employees whose services were terminated due to the hospital's closure. The District …
The petitioners, non‑teaching employees of grant‑in‑aid secondary schools in Maharashtra, challenged a Government Resolution dated 14 March 2024 that granted the second benefit under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) with retrospective effect from 1 January 2024. They argued that …
The applicant, M/s. Datta Sai Services, filed a civil application under Section 29-A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an extension of time for completing arbitration proceedings against M/s. Om Sai Industries. The High Court examined whether it possessed the authority to …
The applicant, Mirabai, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the CrPC against an order of a Judicial Magistrate. The appeal was later converted into a criminal revision application by this Court. The applicant sought to withdraw the revision and instead file a revision before the Sessions …
The petitioner, Santosh Suresh Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in consideration of his representations dated 1 June 2026 and 15 June 2026 submitted to Respondent No.2. The High Court examined whether the court could intervene to compel the respondent to decide the …
The applicant filed multiple applications seeking condonation of a 71‑day delay in filing first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, invoking the principle of interest of justice, condoned the delay and allowed the …
The plaintiff, Chola MS General Insurance Company Ltd, filed multiple applications seeking condonation of a 71‑day delay in filing its first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, finding them satisfactory, condoned the …
The appellants, Bapu Shivaji Saindane and Amol, were taken into custody on 18 July 2026 for failing to appear before the trial court in a case registered under multiple IPC offences and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Their application for bail enlargement was rejected by the Special …
