Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 7801–8000
The petitioners, two lecturers in Computer Science appointed in 1998‑99, challenged an order that reduced their salary, arguing that the Computer Science subject had been receiving 100% grant‑in‑aid since the 2002‑03 academic year and therefore they were entitled to the higher pay scale and arrears. …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of respondent no.6, a girl whose father had lodged a missing complaint. The girl was produced before the court, and her statement was recorded at the police station. During the hearing, the girl …
The plaintiff, Chola MS General Insurance Company Ltd, filed multiple applications seeking condonation of a 71‑day delay in filing its first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, finding them satisfactory, condoned the …
The petitioners, adjoining landholders, were defendants in a civil suit where the plaintiff obtained a temporary injunction on 4‑Oct‑2021 to remove an obstruction on a pathway. The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the injunction, alleging abuse of revenue proceedings and the existence …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking relief, but later informed the court that a compromise had been reached between the parties. They requested the withdrawal of the application. The court considered the request and, noting the parties' agreement, dismissed the application as …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, considered a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence imposed on Nagorao alias Nagnath Bhimrao Lande. He had been convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Palam, under IPC sections 354, 354‑A(2) and 323 and sentenced to imprisonment …
Balaji Anandrao Chinmalwar filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Divisional Commissioner of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Division to register an appeal under Section 6(B) of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 against a Scrutiny Committee order dated 10.08.2026. The respondents, …
Petitioner Jyoti Anandrao Chinmalwar filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Divisional Commissioner of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Division to register an appeal under Section 6(B) of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 against a Scrutiny Committee order dated 10‑08‑2026. The …
The petitioners, who had superannuated, sought the grant of advance increments that were allegedly denied after the Government Resolution dated 24‑08‑2017. The issue was whether the resolution operated retrospectively, denying benefits accrued before its date, or only prospectively. The Court relied …
The petitioners, a group of government employees, sought the grant of advance increments that were denied following a Government Resolution dated 24‑08‑2017. They argued that the resolution should apply retrospectively, affecting increments awarded for outstanding work performed before that date. …
Shahabaz Ali Ashfaq Ali Baig filed Writ Petition No. 12094 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition sought relief concerning a communication issued by Respondent No.2 on 30 September 2025. The Court, …
The petitioners, who are teachers, were appointed as Assistant Teachers by respondent No.6 but were not paid regular salaries by respondents Nos.5 and 6, leading them to resign. They sought payment of arrears of salary, gratuity, and Provident Fund contributions, as well as issuance of service books …
Vishwajeet Engineering Works, through its proprietor Vijay V. Dhumal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. The petitioner had submitted a representation dated 16 August 2026, which the …
The applicant, Vishnupant Dadaroo Devkar, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of an amount of Rs. 16,72,201 deposited by the acquiring body in the court. The court first corrected a misspelling of the applicant's surname in the pleadings. The applicant also requested correction of the same …
The petitioner, Vikas Annsaheb Nakade, claimed he was appointed as a junior clerk in a private school on 4 August 2021 and, after completing probation, should have been regularised with a proposal for approval under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules. He challenged a fresh …
The applicant, a hardware shop owner, lodged a complaint that the accused entered his shop on 15 January 2011, damaged articles and assaulted him. The trial court convicted the accused under IPC sections 452, 324, 323 and 506 read with section 34 and imposed simple imprisonment and fines. The …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, contending that the Special Land Acquisition Officer had correctly valued the dry lands at Rs.360‑400 per R and that the Reference Court erred in enhancing compensation to …
Mohan Dashrath Sasane filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of Respondent No.3 to decide his representation dated 15 March 2026. The petitioner alleged that the delay violated his right to a timely administrative decision. The Court examined …
The case concerned compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project in Ahmednagar. The State of Maharashtra appealed the Reference Court’s award of Rs 2,00,000 per hectare, while the claimants sought a higher rate of Rs 6,00,000 per hectare and interest from the date of the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the award of compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project, contending that the Reference Court had erred in enhancing compensation and in granting interest from the Section 4 notification date. The claimants argued that the Reference Court …
The applicant, Arjun Santu Vetal, filed an application seeking permission for his counsel, Mr. B.T. Bodkhe, to assist him in the anticipatory bail proceedings. The respondents, Sanjay Bajirao Vetal and others, raised no objection to the request. The matter was heard by Justice R.M. Joshi. The sole …
A large group of former government employees filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation, alleging that the pension did not incorporate the annual increment of their last drawn salary. The petitioners contended that they were entitled to the …
The petitioner, Veerabhadreshwara Traders (prop. Yogeesh Hosahalli Mahesha), filed a criminal application seeking amendment of the pleadings and prayer clauses in Writ Petition No. 236 of 2026 against the State of Maharashtra. The respondent's appointed advocate raised no serious objection to the …
A minor petitioner, Ayesha Mohd Ajaz Tadvi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Committee (Respondent No.2) to determine the validity of her claim that she belongs to a Scheduled Tribe, which is essential for her admission to an MBBS course. The petitioner argued that her sister's claim …
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment dated 27‑02‑2012 concerning compensation for lands acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra contended that the Reference Court erred in enhancing compensation to Rs 2,00,000 per hectare …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions pending before it in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment dated 27‑02‑2012 concerning land acquired for the Ghatghar Hydro Electric Project. The State of Maharashtra sought to uphold the original compensation of Rs.360‑400 per R, arguing that the reference …
The petitioner, Jakir, filed a writ petition (No. 10411 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent, Hasmatbee. The petition was filed in 2015, and the matter was heard on 1 September 2026. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition should …
The applicant Mahadeo Pandharinath Munde sought to withdraw the remaining 25% of an amount deposited by the acquiring body, which had earlier deposited only 50% of the sum ordered by the court. The court had previously conditioned the withdrawal on the applicant furnishing a solvent surety, …
The appellant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 265‑day delay in filing a subsequent application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record, and also requested that the abatement of the earlier proceeding be set aside. The respondents opposed the …
The Executive Engineer of SINA Kolegaon Project Division filed multiple civil applications seeking a stay against various respondents in a dispute over an awarded amount. The applicants contended that 75% of the award had already been deposited with the High Court registry as per earlier directions. …
The appellant, Vithal Satwaji Gite, filed Civil Application No. 10163 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 225‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record and to set aside an abatement. Simultaneously, Civil Application No. 10164 of 2026 was filed to condone a …
The appellant, Vithal Satwaji Gite, filed Civil Application No. 10163 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 225‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record and to set aside an abatement. Simultaneously, Civil Application No. 10164 of 2026 was filed to condone a …
Koyta Infotech Private Ltd, through its director, filed Writ Petition No. 11796 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of a government department. The petitioner sought a direction that Respondent No.3 decide the representation/application dated 14 July 2026 …
The Applicants (Vitthal Tukaram Makhre and others) sought recall of a conditional order dated 1 July 2026, which had been issued because the Petitioners failed to complete service on unserved Respondents. The Applicants argued that the failure was bona fide, inadvertent, and due to lack of knowledge …
The applicant, Santosh Shivram Kanhuje, sought the withdrawal of the entire amount deposited by the acquiring body for land acquired for the Ahmednagar‑Beed‑Parali Railway Line. The acquiring body did not contest the withdrawal. The court noted a prior judgment (Civil Applications No. 7662 of 2025) …
The petitioner, Srushti Nilesh Bhoinwad, filed a contempt petition (No. 504 of 2026) arising out of Writ Petition No. 2161 of 2026. The petition sought relief based on a tribe claim. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the State of Maharashtra placed on record an order dated 03.09.2026 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions filed by contractual ambulance drivers seeking relief against non‑payment of wages and arbitrary replacement by contractors. Relying on its earlier order in Writ Petition No. 1913 of 2024 and the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioners filed a civil application (Civil Application No. 9961 of 2026) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The application was considered by the Hon'ble Judge Sachin S. Deshmukh on 4 September 2026. After reviewing the content of the application, the Court …
The applicant, Cheniram Kruparam Sharma, filed a civil application seeking paper publication of a decree. The respondents were summoned twice but failed to appear before the court. At the request of the applicant's counsel, the court considered the application despite the respondents' …
The petitioners, Mahadev Narhari Bhondave and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17 July 2026 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Washi. The petition was presented before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench, with counsel Mr. V. S. Undre appearing for the petitioners and Mr. …
The petitioners, who are doctors employed in government and semi‑government hospitals, challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government Resolution dated 07‑08‑2012 that prohibited them from private practice and made the receipt of a non‑practicing allowance compulsory. The High Court …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of arbitration applications filed by various contractors seeking extensions of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29‑A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications were filed against the Project Director of the National …
The High Court considered three anticipatory bail applications arising from an assault case registered as Crime No. 179/2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The first applicant, Gaurav Deshmukh, withdrew his application, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The remaining applicants, Bhavesh Sunil …
The petitioners, Balasaheb Bhausaheb Gangad and others, filed a civil application seeking to recall an order dated 27 July 2026 that had affected their writ petition (WP No. 3080/2026). The High Court examined whether the order could be set aside and the writ petition restored to its original stage. …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of arbitration applications filed by various contractors seeking extensions of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29‑A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications were filed against the Project Director of the National …
The Dargah Hazrat Gaib Shah Wali Sayyed Sadat (RH), represented by its Mutawalli Shahin Salim Pathan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra and its Minority Welfare Department for not deciding two pending applications dated 19 …
The applicant, a 68‑year‑old man, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a property‑sale fraud alleged under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleges that he impersonated the owner of Gut No. 453 and executed a fraudulent sale deed. The …
The Akhil Marathawada Jilha Parishad Kamgar Union filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Deputy Secretary of the Rural Development and Irrigation Department and other respondents. The petition sought relief against the alleged administrative actions affecting the union members. The High …
The appellant, New India Assurance Company Ltd., filed a first appeal (No. 3194 of 2018) before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The appellant’s authorized signatory and counsel submitted a withdrawal petition, indicating that the award amount had already been …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a group of writ petitions filed by former state employees seeking pensionary benefits. The petitioners claimed they were entitled to monetary benefits and recalculated pension based on the annual increment in their last drawn salary, provided …
The intervenor, a witness, filed two criminal applications seeking to intervene in separate appeals. On the hearing date, he appeared and objected to relief being granted to the original appellant, then filed the intervention applications. Later, without providing any reason, he sought to withdraw …
The petitioners filed a regular civil suit in 2001 for partition and injunction, which was dismissed by the trial court in 2014. They appealed to the District Court, where they later sought, under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC, a short amendment of the prayer to declare title and possession of 5 acres …
The appellant Pradip appealed against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, seeking to have the appeal transferred from the High Court to the District and Sessions Court. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that …
The petitioners, adjoining landholders in Wakodi, Ahmednagar, challenged a temporary injunction granted by the trial court that ordered the opening of a disputed pathway, arguing that the injunction effectively amounted to a final decree in the underlying civil suit. The trial court had allowed the …
The petitioners, who are superannuated government employees, sought entitlement to advance increments for work performed before 24 August 2017 and the calculation of consequent benefits. The Court referred to its earlier orders in Writ Petition No. 9967 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 10947 of 2022, …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing both sides, the court expressed reluctance to grant relief. The applicants' counsel then sought to withdraw the application. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the …
The petitioner, Mandhir Prakashrao Deokar, filed writ petition 12138 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.2) on his representations dated 04‑12‑2025 and 05‑01‑2026. He alleged that the failure to consider the …
A large number of cooperative societies filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought permission to participate in the hearing of their appeals before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Dairy), Mumbai. The Court examined whether the petitioners …
The applicants, Pradhan Shivajirao Sonkamble and Pranita Madhavrao Sonkamble, filed a criminal application seeking quashment of an FIR and charge‑sheet registered for offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC read with Section 34. The FIR alleged an illicit relationship between the …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
The petitioners are forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Assistant Registrar ordered their liquidation and winding‑up under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without granting any hearing. …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners are forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Assistant Registrar ordered their liquidation and winding‑up under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without giving the societies a …
A large number of cooperative societies filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought clarification on their right to participate in the hearings of appeals before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Dairy), Mumbai. The Court examined the …
A large number of cooperative societies filed writ petitions (Nos. 11376‑11599, 11602‑11626 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, on 2 September 2026, issued an order directing the petitioners to participate in the hearing of their appeals before the Joint …
The applicant-wife sought to have Marriage Petition No. 70 of 2026 transferred from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chalisgaon to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon. She argued that the 100 km distance, lack of personal income, and absence of accompaniment would cause financial hardship …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners, a group of 42 cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without being …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
A large number of writ petitions were filed by various Sheli Mendhi Palan Sahakari Sansthas challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitions sought correction of clause (c) in the operative part of the order dated 2 September 2026. The Court examined the petitioners’ request that the …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Venkat applied to quash FIR No. 198 of 2025 alleging that he was falsely implicated for abetment of his alleged fiancée Sunita's suicide under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR, lodged by Sunita's brother Balaji a month after her death, claimed that Venkat had promised marriage, …
Krushna Bhujang Kadam applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with charges under Sections 74, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioners, 42 cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being afforded a hearing. …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies appealed under Section …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1) based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed …
Forty‑two registered cooperative societies under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Murlidhar Pralhad Wattamwar filed a writ petition (6 WRIT PETITION NO.12157 OF 2025) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra concerning land measurement proceedings. The State argued that the petitioner was absent during a scheduled measurement and that joint owners had objected, producing …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 challenged liquidation and winding‑up orders issued by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) of the Act. The societies argued that the orders were passed without any hearing, that the Assistant …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners, forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a government circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies appealed under Section …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
The petitioners are forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar on the basis of a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a government circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies appealed under …
The petitioners are 42 cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 that were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without any …
Anand Devidas Vidyagar filed a criminal revision challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, which rejected his application for discharge under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He also sought condonation of a 115‑day delay in filing the revision. The High Court, …
A large number of cooperative societies filed writ petitions (Nos. 11376‑11399, 11400‑11626 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought clarification and participation in the hearing of their appeals before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Dairy), …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up orders by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1), based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by an Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1), based on a 2022 government circular and a ministerial direction, without being afforded a hearing. The …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were ordered to be liquidated and wound up by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(1) based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without any hearing. The societies filed writ petitions …
Forty‑two registered cooperative societies under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were placed under liquidation and winding‑up by the Assistant Registrar invoking Section 102(1), based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies filed …
Forty‑two cooperative societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, were subjected to liquidation and winding‑up orders under Section 102(1) by the Assistant Registrar, based on a 2022 circular and a ministerial direction, without being given a hearing. The societies …
Komal Tulshiram Girdwad filed a writ petition challenging an order that directed his employer to take action under Section 10 of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De‑Notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of …
In a First Appeal before the National Lok Adalat (High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench), the appellants Rani Santosh Palewad and others sought settlement of a motor accident claim against Shri Shikant Govindrao Shrimangale and others, including an insurance company. The parties, represented by …
The appellant, Soyeb Qureshi, appealed against respondents Feroz Khan and an insurance company regarding a compensation dispute. Both parties appeared before the National Lok Adalat at the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, and submitted a joint compromise agreement. The Lok Adalat, under Section …
The appellants owned lands in Shridhar Jawale village, Jalna district that were acquired for the Nimna Dudhna Project under a 1999 notification. The Land Acquisition Officer’s compensation rates were deemed inadequate and the Reference Court enhanced them to Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, Rs 3,750 for …
The petitioners challenged the order dated 14‑08‑2026 of the Committee that invalidated their claim of belonging to a Scheduled Tribe. They sought direction that the Divisional Commissioner, as appointed Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, …
The petitioner, Shivhar Ankushrao Mande, was appointed to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribes on 13 February 2026, subject to submission of a caste validity certificate from a designated Committee (respondent No. 2). The Committee had not yet decided the petitioner's claim, and the petitioner was …
The petitioner, Abdul Khalil Abdul Rahim, filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents seeking enforcement of a contempt order. Respondents No.4 and No.5 filed an affidavit‑in‑reply stating that they had complied with the order by paying Rs.3,67,770 directly into …
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued that the appeals were non‑maintainable …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Hausabai Babasaheb Birangal, filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued …
Syed Tanveer A. Rahim filed a writ petition (No. 11319 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 13 August 2026, the content of which was not detailed in the order. The principal issue …
The petitioners filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued that the appeals were non‑maintainable …
The petitioners sought condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued that the appeals were non‑maintainable because they were filed beyond the …
The applicants sought condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The trial court noted that the appeals were beyond the 120‑day limit and that the statute …
A large group of writ petitions (19‑Group) were filed by former government employees against the State of Maharashtra seeking proper calculation of their pensionary benefits. The petitioners contended that their pensions were computed without including the annual increment in their last drawn salary …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking execution of a decree from Regular Civil Appeal No.134 of 1970. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. B.A. Darak, requested permission to withdraw the petition while urging the court to expedite the execution proceedings. The bench, presided …
The petitioners, two co‑operative societies – Sant Baludeo Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and Kalika Wadar Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit – filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitions sought relief regarding a representation …
The petitioners, two cooperative societies, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's actions. The court, after hearing counsel, directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 16 June 2026 on its …
The petitioner, Govind Sukhdeorao Aage, challenged the order dated 19‑08‑2026 by the Minister of Rural Development which stayed the Divisional Commissioner’s order disqualifying respondent No. 5, the Sarpanch of Kitti Aadgaon, under the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act. The petitioner argued that …
The appeal in Sandeep Rangnath Shevkar v. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. was withdrawn following an order from a National Lok‑Adalat dated 11‑02‑2023. The applicant, who was both the original claim petitioner and the respondent in the appeal, sought the court's permission to withdraw the amount …
The petitioners, a farmers' cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging an interim order dated 31.08.2015 of the Latur Labour Court and a subsequent judgment dated 16.08.2017 of the Industrial Court in a labour dispute. They sought a direction that the Labour Court decide the main …
The applicants sought permission to withdraw amounts they had deposited with the Court in connection with pending appeals, requesting the same withdrawal proportions previously ordered (50% on undertaking, 25% on surety, 25% to remain in fixed deposit). They also contended that four of the …
The Maharashtra State Council of Examinations and the State cancelled the results of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) after discovering large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering affecting about 7,880 candidates. The petitioners, many of whom were in‑service teachers, challenged both the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions challenging Clause 3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016, which denied subject teachers of classes 6‑8 the prescribed pay scale. Relying on the Nagpur Bench decision in Ganesh Mahadeo Asekar v. State of Maharashtra, …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pensionary benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary, including the …
The petitioners, former government employees of Maharashtra, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. They contended that the State had failed to incorporate the annual increment of their last drawn salary and sought arrears of …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking correction of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. The petitioners argued that their pensions were calculated without including the annual increment in their last drawn …
The petitioners sought to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased Bhausaheb Murlidhar Gondkar, who died on 10 August 2025. A civil application was filed 293 days after the death, raising the question of whether such delay could be condoned. The Court examined the reasons provided for the …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated by including the annual increment applicable to their last …
The appellants were convicted by the Sessions Court for assault causing grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC and for offences under Sections 323 and 504 read with Section 34 IPC, based on an incident on 16 August 2008 where the victim was struck on the head with a wooden log after a verbal dispute …
The petitioner, Rutik Panjabi, challenged a detention order dated 24‑06‑2025 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act (MPDA Act). Although the petitioner faced multiple pending criminal cases and had been released on bail for one …
Ashlesa Avinath Bhandarkar filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking amendment of her petition against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The application specifically prayed for relief under clause ‘B’, which required the court’s permission to …
The High Court of Bombay heard three anticipatory bail applications filed by police personnel accused of misappropriating Rs. 47.6 lakh of government funds transferred to their accounts through a digital salary processing system. The applicants claimed they were unaware of the illegality, …
The petitioners, a group of subject teachers of classes 6 to 8, challenged Clause 3 of the Government Resolution dated 13‑10‑2016, alleging it was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The High Court examined whether the clause unjustly denied the petitioners the …
The petitioners, the legal representatives of the deceased Bhimrao Yadav Koli, filed an application seeking the withdrawal of an award amount that had been deposited by the acquiring body in the High Court. The petitioners argued that the first appeal (No. 3588 of 2023) had already been disposed of, …
The petitioners, Raosaheb Vitthalrao Savant and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief concerning a representation they had submitted on 10 February 2025. They alleged that the respondent State authority had not taken a decision on the …
The petitioner, Nishant Shrikrushnarao Gophane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation, Parbhani. The petitioner had submitted a representation on 21 November 2024 which remained pending. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners, an education society, challenged a School Tribunal order that allowed the termination of Respondent No.1, a teacher appointed on a temporary basis in 2006, after he had served continuously until 2014. The petitioners argued that the employee, who held only a B.P.Ed. qualification …
The petitioners Shaikh Latif, Shaikh Chand and others filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed its reluctance to interfere with the impugned order. Consequently, the …
Aarti Bisan Teji filed a civil application (No. 10540 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard the matter and allowed the application. The court directed that the petition be amended within three weeks and that the amended copy be served on the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for about 7,880 candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The Court found that the examination …
Raybhan s/o Namdeo Game & others filed a civil application and writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. The matter was heard by Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. The court examined the prayer clauses sought by the applicants. It allowed …
Shaikh Farooq Shaikh Habib filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the failure of the State of Maharashtra, through Respondent No.3, to decide his representations dated 24 October 2024 and 28 November 2024. The petitioner alleged that the delay violated his right to a timely …
The petitioner, Geetabai Mahadev Khedkar, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in a writ petition (WPST/29567/2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The State, represented by its Deputy Secretary, raised objections concerning the delay and procedural deficiencies. The High Court …
The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Jaggnath Pedde, filed Criminal Application No. 3412 of 2022 seeking relief against Vaishnavi, his wife, and another respondent. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. H. H. Padalkar and Mr. Katneshwarkar, informed the court that the dispute between the parties had been amicably …
The petitioner, Usha Bhausaheb Phule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Vilas S. Panpatte, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission. After hearing, the …
The petitioner, Santosh Raosaheb Nikhade, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representation dated 11 April 2025. The petitioner sought a judicial directive compelling the respondent to consider his representation. The High Court examined whether …
The petitioner filed an RTI application for information on Primary/Secondary Ashram Schools, but the Public Information Officer directed him to approach each school separately and the petitioner did not receive the information. He appealed to the first appellate authority under Section 19(1) of the …
The petitioners, Sangita Sadashiv Nikat and others, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the State of Maharashtra decide on their representation dated 11 August 2026. The petition raised the question of whether the State must consider the representation on its merits in light of a …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals filed by numerous claimants against the State of Maharashtra and acquiring bodies, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in land acquisition proceedings. The claimants argued that the same land acquisition …
The petition was filed by Vivekanand Shikshan Sanstha Samarth Nagar, represented by its President, seeking the State of Maharashtra's approval for the promotion of its second petitioner to the post of Assistant Teacher/Lecturer at Vivekanand Junior College, Samarth Nagar, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a batch of first appeals filed by numerous claimants seeking enhanced compensation under land acquisition proceedings. The claimants argued that their appeals should be referred back to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication, relying on the …
The petitioner, Virbhadra Temple Shaha Dongar, through its trustee Ashok Bhikaji Katkar, filed a writ petition against the Assistant Charity Commissioner seeking a direction to decide Change Report No. 741 of 2024 within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the delay in deciding the change …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a consolidated group of first appeals filed by numerous claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in land acquisition proceedings. The claimants argued that, similar to earlier matters, the appeals should be relegated back to the …
The petitioners, former government employees, challenged the calculation of their pensionary benefits, contending that they were denied the appropriate increments and arrears. The High Court examined earlier orders of its coordinate benches in Writ Petitions No. 5445 of 2026, No. 3412 of 2026, and …
The petitioner, Bhagyeshali Bhaskar Rao Jagtap, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the handling of his representation dated 24 August 2026. The petition sought relief concerning the application of a transfer policy contained in a Government Resolution …
The petitioners, a group of former government employees of the State of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions alleging that their pensionary benefits were miscalculated because the annual increment in their last drawn salary was not incorporated. They sought monetary benefits, recalculated pension …
The petitioner, Avinash Thaka Shete, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted by a Government Resolution dated 27 March 2024. Accordingly, the Court …
Lokmat Media Private Limited and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners later approached the court seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition, stating that they had already filed a Civil Revision Application as the appropriate remedy. The court …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings where claimants sought enhanced compensation. The claimants, represented by Ms. M. V. Narwade, argued that the appeals should be sent back to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication, citing a prior …
The appellant, Damodhar Durgaï Bhadange, sought leave to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025), the appellant requested that the appeal be transferred to the District and Sessions …
The petition filed by Parwatibai Bhimrao Bende sought condonation of a 381‑day delay in filing a cross‑objection in Civil Application No. 9703 of 2026. The respondent opposed the condonation, arguing that no sufficient reason was shown for the delay and prayed for rejection. The court examined the …
The High Court considered a consolidated batch of first appeals filed by numerous claimants against the State of Maharashtra and acquiring bodies, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in land acquisition matters. The claimants argued that, similar to earlier cases, the appeals should be …
Sunita Yuvraj Jadhav filed Civil Application No. 9977 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant moved the court for amendment of the petition as per prayer clause ‘B’. The court examined the reasons set out in …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered an anticipatory bail application (No. 1463 of 2026) filed by Nilesy Raju Deore against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant sought leave of the court to allow an informant, who is also the victim, to assist him. The court held that since the …
The applicant, Prafull Shravan Gaikwad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 0493 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 132, 74, 308(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR, lodged by the Medical Superintendent, claimed that the applicant and co‑accused …
The petitioners, Nitesh Kumar Prakash Kendre and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The court examined whether the petitioners' grievance could be addressed directly by the court or through the Grievance …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition (No. 480 of 2011) arising out of a writ petition (WP/6155/2011). The main writ petition had already been disposed of by the court. The respondents argued that with the disposal of the writ, the contempt petition could no longer survive. The bench examined …
The petitioner, Manda Buvasaheb Bade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief concerning his representation dated 1 July 2026. The petition challenged the respondents’ (State of Maharashtra and others) failure to decide the representation on its merits. …
The petitioners, employees deployed in tribal and PESA areas, filed a writ petition seeking salary benefits under the one‑step pay‑scale made available by a Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They alleged that the State had not paid the applicable arrears and current salary. The Court noted …
The petitioner, Satyawan Vitthal Khandekar, sought review of a judgment dated 22 August 2025 in which his writ petition was dismissed, confirming his removal from service based on a conviction under Section 309 IPC. The petitioner argued that his conviction had been set aside by an appellate court …
Swati Deepak Gujar filed a writ petition challenging her appointment, alleging grievance against the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief concerning the validity of her posting as an Aasha Swayam Sevika. The High Court examined the petition and found that the petitioner had already been …
The appellants, owners of land acquired for Percolation Tank No. 07 in Belora village, Jalna district, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and enhanced by the Reference Court as inadequate. They sought higher rates on the basis of parity with a recent judgment …
The petitioners, a group of retired government employees, filed writ petitions challenging the denial of advance increments that were promised for outstanding work performed before 24 August 2017. The State of Maharashtra contended that a Government Resolution dated 24 August 2017 barred …
The petitioner, Sachin Janaba, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of a compassionate appointment under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Respondents, including the State of Maharashtra, argued that a Government resolution dated 27 …
The New India Assurance Co. appealed against the compensation awarded by a tribunal, seeking to prevent the applicants from withdrawing the balance amount deposited by the insurer. The applicants filed a civil application requesting permission to withdraw a portion of the balance to fund their …
The applicants sought permission to intervene in a criminal appeal, stating that the victim's legal representatives wished to join the proceedings. The respondent No.1 (appellant) raised no objection to the intervention. The court considered whether the intervenor’s request complied with procedural …
In Contempt Petition No. 489 of 2013 filed by Sanjay Uttamrao Kotule against Rajiv Digambarrao Javalekar, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether any further relief could be granted. Finding that the petition could no longer be …
Mangesh Siddharth Jadhav and Siddharth Magan Jadhav were convicted by the Sessions Court in Aurangabad for offences under Sections 326 and 367 of the Indian Penal Code, relating to grievous hurt and kidnapping, arising from a family dispute that escalated into a violent assault with an iron rod. The …
The applicant, Abdul Javed, convicted under Section 9A of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment, applied for a passport to attend the Haj pilgrimage. The passport authority refused issuance pending clarification of two police cases and the pending …
Petitioners Jyoti Asaram Surse Katkar and another filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief. The Court examined whether the petitioners could pursue their grievance through the Grievance Committee established under a Government Resolution dated 27 March 2024, clause 15. …
The petitioners, teachers awarded the Adarsh Shikshak Puraskar, claimed that the additional increment promised under Government Circular dated 12‑12‑2000 had not been paid and that the respondents had taken no cognizance. The High Court observed that their grievance fell within the scope of its …
The petitioners, teachers awarded the Adarsh Shikshak Puraskar, claimed they were entitled to an additional increment under Government Circular dated 12.12.2000, but the increment had not been granted. They filed writ petitions seeking direction to the State and Zilla Parishad to confer the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a correction to the minutes of an order dated 02.09.2026, specifically requesting deletion of the first paragraph on the ground that steps had already been taken against unserved respondents and those …
The applicant, Ravin Baban Bhil, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The court examined the tribunal's endorsement of the applicant's entitlement after considering the rival …
Aruna, the appellant, filed a criminal appeal against the trial court's acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. She sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025). The High …
Manoj Sampat Bhil applied to the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The tribunal had earlier endorsed his entitlement after considering the rival contentions of the parties. The court …
The petitioner, a student, sought admission to a professional course under a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates and applied for caste/tribe certificate verification on 18 May 2026. She filed a writ petition requesting the Scrutiny Committee to decide her claim within a stipulated period. …
The petitioners, Urmila B. Nikam and another, filed a civil application seeking relief following the death of Balasaheb Balwantrao Nikam. The application was filed against the Union of India and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The High Court examined the prayer clause ‘C’ of the …
The petitioners, managing trustees of Kali Math Trust, challenged the judgment and order dated 26 July 2024 of the Joint Charity Commissioner which set aside an earlier 2014 order approving a new scheme under Section 50A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. They argued that the Joint Charity …
The appellant was convicted by a Special Court for offences under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. On appeal, the High Court examined whether the prosecution had satisfactorily proved that the victim was a child under …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and its 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's cancellation of the TET 2018 and 2019 results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had statutory authority …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The petitioners sought to bring the legal representative of the deceased petitioner No.6, Ms. Kusum Vitthalrao Dawkhare, on record, despite a delay of 2,280 days in filing the application. The court examined whether such a delay could be condoned and whether the additional representative, Ms. …
