DISPOSED OFF
The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. concerning motor accident claim petitions. The insurer submitted withdrawal letters and authority letters for each matter, indicating acceptance of the awards …
DISPOSED OFF
The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Limited against various claimants in motor accident claim matters. The insurer sought condonation of delay in filing the appeals and submitted withdrawal letters …
DISMISSED
Suraj Anil Patel filed a criminal writ petition seeking Rs.10,00,000 compensation for alleged illegal detention from 22.08.2021 to 23.08.2021. The petitioner had been charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and a bailable warrant was ordered on 08.03.2021 after he failed to …
Withdrawn
Bhushan Belaji Borade applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. The court, noting the change in …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking an extension of time for the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner’s tribe claim, after the High Court had previously ordered a decision by the end of July 2026. The Committee reported that due to the pendency of the claim it could not …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra and the Scheduled Tribes Certificate Scrutiny Committee applied for an extension of time to decide the tribal claim of the petitioner in Writ Petition No.1153 of 2026. The High Court had previously ordered the Committee to render its decision by the end of June 2026. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, RadhaKrishna Rajaram Gaikwad, filed a complaint on 29 April 2026 under Sections 10(1d) and 12 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court was asked to determine whether the respondent authorities were required …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by several retired government employees seeking correction of their pensionary benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary, including the annual …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of heirs filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay ranging from 3,167 to 4,754 days in preferring first appeals against the State of Maharashtra. The State contested the applications, but the court found no evidence of mala‑fides and noted the applicants were willing to …
DISPOSED OFF
The Rajbinde family members filed civil applications (Nos. 14037, 14055, 14047 of 2024) against the State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Jalna. These applications were linked to first appeals (Nos. 26264 of 2024, 480 of 2026, 476 of 2026). The High Court, after disposing of the …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal (No. 3821 of 2016) and a related civil application before the National Lok Adalat at the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench. The appellant accepted the award previously passed by the M.A.C.T., Ahmednagar in M.A.C.P. No. 228/2010 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the amount they had deposited in the court pursuant to an award. The respondents opposed the application. The court examined the submissions of both parties and, after considering the arguments, decided to partially allow the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Yashwant Laxman Shelke, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction that Respondent No.3 decide on his proposal dated 2 September 2025. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra and other parties. The principal issue was whether the court could …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Rangnath Limbrij Mudame et al. and Yadav Ramchandra Barhale et al., filed writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the grievance could be directly entertained by the High Court or had to be first raised …
DISMISSED
The case involved multiple land acquisition references for the construction of a State Transport (S.T.) stand and residential quarters at Erandol. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed different market values for the same project, which were later enhanced by the Reference Court using …
DISPOSED OFF
Kalpesh Ramakant Deshmukh filed a writ petition seeking regularisation of his appointment as a peon, requesting a regular pay scale of Rs.15,000-47,600 instead of the honorarium of Rs.8,000 he was receiving. The petition alleged that the respondent authorities had failed to approve his regular …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking an extension of time to pronounce judgment in a validity proceeding against Anushka Natkare. The High Court had earlier, on 8 June 2026, directed the committee to decide the proceedings by the end of July 2026. The applicants argued that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sadashiv Champatrao More, filed Civil Application No. 10858 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. The application sought the relief specified in Prayer Clause B of the petition. After hearing the matter, the court found …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, a police havildar, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and receiving Rs.1,000 as a bribe. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s testimony and a panch witness, but the defence argued that the money was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking restoration of a first appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The Registrar had previously granted the applicant two weeks from 03‑02‑2026 to comply, but the applicant delayed 199 days before filing the civil …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, a poor agriculturist, filed an application seeking condonation of a 2,294‑day delay in filing his first appeal against a judgment dated 12 April 2007. He argued that the delay was not deliberate, arising from his illiteracy, lack of legal knowledge, and communication gaps with his …
DISPOSED OFF
Irba Tukaram Tompe filed Writ Petition No. 12650 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction that Respondent No. 2 decide on his representation dated 18 August 2026. The petition alleged undue delay by the respondent authority in acting on the representation. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, which had deposited 50% of the award amount in the court as directed by a Reference Court. The issue was whether the applicants could withdraw the entire deposited sum along with accrued …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a candidate for MBBS admission, sought a direction for the State Tribal Status Committee to decide her Scheduled Tribe status claim, pending since December 2024, and also requested interim admission under the ST category as her name appeared in the Common Entrance Test list. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Sandesh Devidas Surwad filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Committee to decide his Scheduled Tribe claim within a stipulated period and to have his category corrected in the State Common Entrance Test list where he was not shown as ST. The petition noted that his …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The New India Assurance Co Ltd filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the remaining balance of funds deposited in the court’s office after an earlier order on 20 August 2026 allowed it to withdraw the amount to which it was entitled. The earlier order had already resulted in the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
These cross-appeals arose from a common judgment and award dated 17 April 2008 of the Land Reference Court, Latur, in LAR Nos. 86, 88, 89, 92 and 252 of 2007. The claimants' lands in Gurnal, Taluka Deoni, District Latur, were acquired for construction of the Gurnal Storage Tank under a Section 4 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application to have the legal heirs of two deceased persons, Ambadas Anna Shinde and Gayabai Ambadas Shinde, brought on record in pending proceedings. The heirs were unaware of the case, resulting in a delay in seeking their joinder. The court examined whether the delay …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay heard four writ petitions challenging the dismissal of applications for substitution of names in a compassionate appointment waiting list. All petitions were heard together because they raised common issues. The Court relied on its earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 8116 …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates. The Court found that the examination …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay—209 and 208 days respectively—for filing first appeals, citing the time taken to obtain directions from the Law and Judiciary Department. The learned Advocate General for the State argued that the delay was not …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Dhananjay Laxman Tondewad, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State's Scrutiny Committee failed to comply with the court’s order dated 27 July 2026, which required a decision on his tribal claim within three weeks. The petitioner needed a validity certificate for admission …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court considered several anticipatory bail applications filed by individuals accused of assaulting an informant under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that 8‑10 persons, including the applicants, …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Laxman Vithoba Shinde filed a writ petition challenging an order of the District Collector that disqualified him under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. He had previously contested the same order before the Divisional Commissioner under Section 16 of the …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Shridhar Narayan Tambe and others, filed a criminal application which, during its pendency, was settled between the parties. The applicants' counsel sought to withdraw the application. The Court noted the settlement and the request for withdrawal. No substantive merits of the case …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed four civil applications seeking relief in connection with two first appeals (ST No.31208/2010 and ST No.31214/2010). Applications 16390/2010 and 16392/2010 pleaded for condonation of a delay of 209 and 208 days respectively in filing the first appeals, attributing the …
DISPOSED OFF
The State filed civil applications seeking condonation of 208‑209 day delays in filing first appeals against a judgment favoring Vinayak Shankarrao Mane. The State’s Advocate General explained the delay was due to awaiting directions from the Law and Judiciary Department. The court held that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, represented by Ms. Fatema Kazi and Mr. S.S. Kazi, filed a writ petition (No. 4281 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Tahsildar, Sillod and others. During the proceedings, the petitioners applied for leave to withdraw the petition, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award, asserting that the entire amount had been deposited with the court. The respondent’s counsel opposed the stay. The court examined the request and, noting the deposit of the amount, granted a stay …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Aniruddha Eknath Latpate, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Superintendent of Police, Parbhani, consider a representation he submitted on 25 November 2016. He relied on a prior judgment of this Court (Writ Petition No.12966/2017) which held that interest at 12% per …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Dattu Kistappa Machinwar filed a writ petition seeking direction for the fixation of his pay under the 7th Pay Commission, alleging undue delay. Respondents, including the State of Maharashtra, indicated that the proposal for his pay fixation had been forwarded by Respondent No.5 to …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Satish Gajanan Dusane filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal against a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, represented by Advocate Joydeep Chatterji, requested that the application for leave to appeal be fixed for final hearing at an early date. The Court, after …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Babasaheb Karbhari Sarbande, filed a first appeal 95 days after the impugned judgment and sought condonation of the delay. The appellant also applied for a stay of execution of the judgment and award, claiming the entire amount had been deposited with the court. Additionally, the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants sought to be impleaded in writ petition No. 8964 of 2021 and to obtain appointment as Kendrapramukh in Zilla Parishad schools. They argued that earlier orders of the Court dated 17‑08‑2021 and 14‑08‑2026 prevented the Zilla Parishad from proceeding with such appointments. The Court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The wife filed a Section 24 CPC application seeking transfer of a custody suit (Civil M.A. No.11 of 2024) from the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nilanga (Latur) to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, citing the inconvenience of traveling 350 km with a minor child. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Balasaheb Dagdu Pandit, filed a writ petition challenging a grievance that had been considered by the State of Maharashtra. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was absorbed into service and subsequently retired upon superannuation. The petitioner’s counsel informed the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sau. Chandrakala, filed Writ Petition No. 8959 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Divisional Commissioner and others. The petition remained pending for over thirteen years before the matter was heard on 6 August 2026. The learned …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Himmat Patil, appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a 2016 Sessions case involving offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 324, 325 and 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victims with sticks, an iron rod, an axe and a sword on 14 February …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, United India Insurance Company Ltd, appealed against a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award of Rs.12,92,400 in favor of the deceased's family, alleging that the death resulted from the deceased's own intoxication and not from the truck driver's negligence. The deceased, Narendra, was …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Satish Daniel Bhalerao, filed a writ petition and a contempt petition against Sujit Bhairu Jadhav in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. S.R. Andhale, later instructed the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ganesh Vijay Meher, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief concerning a representation he submitted on 10 August 2026. The representation was addressed to Respondent No. 2, the Union of India, and the petitioner sought a decision on its merits. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by several former government employees seeking correction of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. The petitioners argued that their pensions were calculated without including the annual increment in …
DISPOSED OFF
Bharti AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd., as appellant, filed a first appeal against a decree. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after considering the request, allowed the withdrawal and ordered that the appeal stand disposed of as withdrawn. …
DISPOSED OFF
Bharti AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application against Afsana Saleem Shaikh and others. The matter was linked to a first appeal, which the appellant subsequently withdrew. The court noted that with the withdrawal, no substantive issues remained in the civil application. Accordingly, …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Ibrahim Dadabhai Shaikh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in FIR No. 0832 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the POCSO Act, including alleged caste‑based abuse, outraging the modesty of a 17‑year‑old SC/ST victim …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, former government employees, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pensionary benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment in their last drawn salary. The Court noted that the issue had …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of their last drawn salary, including the annual increment, and that …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners sought permission to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record in the pending suit. An application (CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13167 OF 2025) was filed for this purpose, and a separate application (CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2025) requested condonation of a …
DISPOSED OFF
Nandini Kerba Surwase filed a writ petition (No. 10401 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner learned that the substantive claim she raised had already been decided by the respondent's …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of government employees filed several writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment in their last drawn salary. The petitioners sought the difference in pensionary …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking recalculation of their pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should include the annual increment applicable to their last drawn salary before …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a common judgment dated 5 April 2017 that enhanced the compensation for dry land acquired in Devgaon Khavne from Rs.1500 to Rs.2600 per R. They sought a higher rate by relying on three different precedents: Rs.7586 per R fixed in LAR No.457 of 2013 (still under appeal), a …
Withdrawn
The petitioner filed several contempt petitions (Nos. 415 of 2018, 89 of 2019, 284 of 2020, 285 of 2020) and criminal writ petitions (Nos. 423 of 2019, 1385 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought to withdraw all the petitions. The …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for dry land acquired from Devgaon Khavne, arguing that the rate should be enhanced based on earlier reference court decisions and a National Lok Adalat settlement. The State opposed, contending that the 2013 rate of Rs.7586 per R was not final, the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shaikh Naser Shaikh Hasan, filed applications with the Tahsildar on 28 July 2025 and 13 April 2026, which remained undecided despite directions from a higher authority. The petitioner approached the Bombay High Court seeking enforcement of those directions. The Court examined whether …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Shaikh Aslam Shaikh Khushal, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. After hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The court granted the leave, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a 2017 common judgment fixing compensation for dry land acquired in Devgaon Khavne, seeking a higher rate by relying on earlier awards: Rs.7586 per R from LAR No.457/2013, Rs.6000 per R from a National Lok Adalat settlement (First Appeal No.43/2023), and Rs.3700 per R from …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pravin Hanumant Kumkar, submitted a proposal on 16th March 2026 through the Head Master, which was pending consideration by Respondent No.3. The petition sought judicial intervention to ensure the proposal was acted upon. The Court examined whether the administrative authority …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Rupsing Subhash Rathod was convicted by the Special Sessions Judge, Latur, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for possession of 6 kg of ganja, receiving a two‑year imprisonment. He was the pillion rider on a motorcycle from which the narcotics were …
DISPOSED OFF
Shaikh Alim Shaikh Nur filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Collector of Maharashtra on a representation submitted on 06‑02‑2026. The petitioner sought a directive for the Collector to consider the representation on its merits within a reasonable time. The Court examined whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Deepak Ramesh Chetwani, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1425 of 2026) along with a criminal application (No. 3596 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief, and both parties were represented by counsel. After …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants were released on bail with a condition to attend the police station three times a week. One applicant sought relaxation of this condition for the dates 7th, 9th and 12th September 2026 due to his daughter's wedding. The prosecution, through a report dated 3rd September 2026, expressed …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed applications under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 20 February 2024, seeking acquisition of land. They approached the High Court by filing Writ Petition No. 12266 of 2026 challenging the delay in adjudication. The Court examined whether the Sub‑Divisional …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The court examined the statutory powers …
DISMISSED
The appellants filed criminal appeals challenging the trial proceedings after a charge-sheet was filed against the respondent. The respondent was subsequently granted regular bail. The appellants argued that the filing of the charge-sheet and the bail did not preclude the appeals, while the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Surya Bhavare, was convicted under Section 326 IPC for assault with an axe causing a skull fracture and sentenced to three years and six months imprisonment. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 729 of …
DISPOSED OFF
Shankar Chandrakant Batinwar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The respondent State, through its Additional Government Pleader, contended that the petitioner had an alternate efficacious remedy by approaching the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioner sought condonation of a 42‑day delay in filing an appeal, which the learned appellate court considered. The State opposed the condonation. The court, after reviewing the reasons provided, allowed the application and condoned the delay, disposing of the criminal application. In a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ganesh Hari Das, filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of an earlier order. He later submitted a letter dated 10 September 2026 stating that he had complied with the contempt order and requested the withdrawal of the petition. The court took the letter on record and, after …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants sought restoration of a criminal proceeding that had been dismissed because they failed to amend the application within the time ordered by the court. They explained that they could not obtain a certified copy of the chargesheet until after the amendment deadline, causing an …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a group of writ petitions filed by retired government employees seeking enhanced pensionary benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be recalculated to include the annual increment on their last drawn salary and that they were …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Rafat Hussain Ansari and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 57 of 2014) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was heard by the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, with counsel P. P. Mandlik and A. S. Gandhi representing the petitioners and N. B. Patil …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Nilesh Chandraprakash Somani and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They had submitted representations to the Secretary of the Uchchatam Krushi Utpadan Bazar Samiti on 17 July 2026 and 14 August 2026. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged the bid proceeding for a property in Gut No.19/1, village Khadit Khurd, alleging that the calculation under Order 21 Rule 66 of the Civil Procedure Code was not in line with the decree of 27‑04‑2007 and resulted in a substantially lower amount even at a 19% rate. They …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Rahul Kishor Patil filed a writ petition fearing loss of his admission to an M.Tech program because he could not produce a Scheduled Tribe validity certificate, whereas a vigilance report had been accepted for his brother. He alleged inaction by the committee handling his case and sought …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vasant Rambhau Bhadane, was appointed as Mistri Grade‑II in 1983 and was placed on a time‑bound pay scale in 1995, becoming eligible for a higher pay scale from December 2007. Despite this entitlement, he was not paid the benefits of the second time‑bound scale before his retirement …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner was appointed as Kotwal in March 2015 to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates, with a condition to submit a tribe validity certificate within six months. No proposal was sent to the Scrutiny Committee for more than eleven years, and the Collector issued a show‑cause notice …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Ravindra Narayan Wagh filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief concerning a representation he submitted on 14 May 2026. The petition challenged the failure of Respondent No. 3 to consider the representation on its merits. The Court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Pradeep Pandurang Kawarkhe and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. They had earlier submitted an application/representation on 11 June 2026 which remained pending. The Court examined whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shubhangi Shamakant Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Education Officer regarding her representations dated 24 June 2024, 26 March 2025 and 5 December 2025. The High Court examined whether the Education Officer was obligated to consider and decide those …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Jyotsana Sunil Pagare, filed Writ Petition No. 11588 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The legal heirs of the deceased filed an appeal but failed to file it within the prescribed period, resulting in a delay of 2,228 days. They moved the High Court seeking condonation of this delay, stating there was no objection from the State and they were willing to forgo any interest or statutory …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The husband deposited Rs.50,000 in the court as interim maintenance without prejudice to his rights. The wife filed a separate application seeking withdrawal of that amount, contending that her total maintenance arrears exceed Rs.4 lakhs and that she is unemployed. The husband objected to the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard two civil applications filed by Shri Saibaba Sansthan, Shirdi, seeking the Court's permission to implement internal resolutions. The first application sought approval to install 333 new CCTV cameras under Resolution No. 264 dated 07/07/2026, with an …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard two civil applications filed by Shri Saibaba Sansthan, Shirdi, seeking the Court's permission to implement internal resolutions. The first application sought approval to install 333 new CCTV cameras under Resolution No. 264 dated 07/07/2026, with an …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Mahadeo Krishana Bhanduge, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of Rs.10,48,261 deposited by the acquiring body. The court noted a prior order in First Appeal (St.) No.15473 of 2024 allowing a similar withdrawal and, for consistency, ordered the same …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Kadam Sanjaykumar Shivraj and others, and Munjaram Bapurao Mundhe and others, filed writ petitions seeking the grant of a selection grade, alleging that their representations and proposals were pending with the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. The respondents, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Gena Anna Rama Kasab, sought to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the Acquiring Body in the court, along with accrued interest, against the State of Maharashtra. The State opposed the withdrawal, arguing that only 50% of the amount had been deposited as …
DISPOSED OFF
Patel Arth Earth Movers, represented by Aakeb Azhar Shaikh, filed Writ Petition No. 12271 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Collector of Sambhajinagar regarding a representation dated 21 April 2026. The petition sought a directive for the Collector …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Magasvargiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed Writ Petition No. 12289 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to act on their proposal dated 09‑02‑2026. They contended that despite a Government …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application (No. 10161 of 2026) seeking deletion of the name of Applicant No.1, who had died on 16 December 2025, from all proceedings before the Court. The Court accepted the death certificate and allowed the deletion, directing it be effected within a week. In a …
DISPOSED OFF
Santosh Shivlal Munemanik filed a writ petition challenging the failure of Respondent No.4 to forward his application to the appropriate authority. The High Court examined whether Respondent No.4 was legally obliged to transmit the petitioner's proposal to Respondent No.3 and whether Respondent No.3 …
DISMISSED
The applicant, Suresh Ambarnath Londhe, was convicted under Section 500 IPC for defamation based on letters, pamphlets, and a public display alleging fraud by the complainant. He appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial was conducted as a summary trial and that the successor magistrate …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the delay in the State of Maharashtra's consideration of their representations filed as Exhibit‑F. The High Court examined whether the State had complied with procedural requirements and prevailing government policies in addressing the petitioners' …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Mahendra Ganeshlal Agrawal and others, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw compensation that had been deposited with the High Court of Bombay. They relied on a prior order dated 09.06.2025 in Civil Application No.2120 of 2025. The Court examined whether the applicants …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Dr. Govind Hari Chaudhari and another, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They sought relief from the High Court, alleging that the appropriate forum for their grievance was not being provided. The Court examined whether the petition fell within …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Urmila Ganpatrao Pandhare applied to the Bombay High Court seeking to withdraw the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The court examined the tribunal's endorsement of the applicant's entitlement and the competing interests of the parties. It allowed a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Bharat Ramniwas Chandak, sought to withdraw 10% of the compensation amount deposited by CIDCO after CIDCO appealed a 2019 award and deposited 60% of the payable sum with interest. The applicant argued that, based on the shareholding arrangement, he is entitled to a 10% interest in the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Rangubai Parasram Godse, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body under a court‑ordered award. The entire award amount had been deposited following a judgment dated 7 April 2026. Relying on earlier …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Prasanna Bhalchandra Vaidya, was terminated in April 2022, successfully appealed and was reinstated in November 2022 with salary as per the 6th Pay Commission. He filed two civil applications seeking unpaid salary, back wages, and the benefit of the 7th Pay Commission, as well as a …
DISPOSED OFF
The writ petition was dismissed on 18.08.2026 for want of prosecution, with the court noting the petitioner had lost interest and made an incorrect statement about a stay. The petitioner subsequently filed a civil application seeking recall of that dismissal order. Neither the petitioner nor any …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 25‑July‑2018 which directed that the respondent, Santosh, be given the designation of Tracer with retrospective benefits from his date of joining in 1985. The respondent, originally appointed as a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shivaji Shekshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition challenging a matter before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was found to contain procedural defects, prompting the petitioner to seek permission to withdraw the petition and file a fresh one. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to implement an order dated 10 October 2024 passed by the District Magistrate of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The respondents, …
DISPOSED OFF
Mahalappa Shripati Tele and others filed Writ Petition No. 12390 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners also lodged an objection on 09.04.2026 concerning the same matter. The Court examined whether the objection …
Dismissed/Rule Discharged
The applicant, a minor represented by a guardian, filed a civil application seeking a modification of a June 29, 2026 order that gave the State Committee six months to decide the applicant's claim. The applicant argued that the Committee had not decided the claim by the September 7, 2026 deadline …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Tukaram Sambha Musande, filed a civil application seeking modification and correction of a judgment dated 26 March 2026 in First Appeal No. 632 of 2012. The correction pertained to the description of land in the chart, specifically changing the Gat number from …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
DISPOSED OFF
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to implement a District Magistrate's order dated 19 October 2023, issued under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner argued that the order should be enforced without delay. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner Uttam Dharma Koli filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for an effective investigation into FIR No.15 of 2023 registered at Raver Police Station, Jalgaon. The Court examined the petition and noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in respect of the FIR and that a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petition was filed challenging an order dated 10 August 2023 passed by an Adhoc District Judge in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 39 of 2022, which arose from an order in Special Civil Suit No. 17 of 2022. While the writ petition was pending, the trial court disposed of the underlying Special …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pornima Rajesh Bhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking direction regarding a pending appeal filed on 18 August 2025. The petition raised concerns about the delay in the respondent's decision on that appeal. The Court examined whether it …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a student seeking admission to a medical college, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State’s Committee to decide her pending caste validity claim by 11 September 2026. The claim had been pending since 2024, with a Vigilance Cell Committee report submitted in May 2025. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Govind Balaji Lone, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the delay by the Education Officer in deciding a proposal dated 24 August 2026. The petitioner sought a directive for a timely decision, alleging that the delay violated his statutory rights. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of writ petitions numbered 1468 of 2025 to 14662 of 2025. The court issued practical directions ordering the petitioners to take necessary steps within four weeks, failing which the petitions would be dismissed. It directed that notice be …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 and 4.7 of a 2012 Government Resolution that barred medical officers in government, semi‑government and local self‑government hospitals from engaging in private practice. The High Court noted that the same issue had already been decided in Writ …
DISMISSED
Madhav Ramrao Shinde applied for anticipatory bail before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already surrendered to the police. Consequently, the court found that there was no longer any ground for …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajendra Natthu Wadar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the delay in deciding a proposal dated 28/06/2019 that had been recommended by the Commissioner. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and a third respondent, …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Abdul Rauf Ansari and Momin Jula Mohamad in connection with FIR No. 427/2026 alleging assault on an informant. The FIR alleged that the applicants used a stick or iron rod, but the injury certificate showed only a single incised …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Piraji Baburao Manjule and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a directive that the respondents decide on their representation dated 18 July 2026 on its merits. The petitioners urged the Court to consider the order issued by the Reserve Bank of India on 1 …
DISPOSED OFF
Several educational trusts filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right to Education Act. The petitions questioned whether they were eligible for such reimbursement and asked the State to examine their proposals. The Court noted that the matter was …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Maula Khan Waheb Khan Pathan, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution lodged a charge sheet. The petitioner, through his counsel, sought to withdraw the bail application and requested …
RULE DISCHARGED
The petitioner, Prashant Bhaskar Wagh, sought to quash several notices and orders issued by various state officials and to restrain them from taking possession of his properties, claiming the notices were illegal and beyond jurisdiction. He specifically requested an interim stay of a notice dated …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.08.2016 of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which rejected their application under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioners argued that the civil suit (RCS No. 579 of 2014, now SCS No. 64 of …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by former state employees seeking correction of their pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions were calculated without including the annual increment in their last drawn salary and that they …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition on 31 August 2026 seeking a court order that the scrutiny committee decide his pending claim by 5 September 2026, fearing loss of a medical college admission. The claim had been pending since 19 December 2025, but the required …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Vaishnavi Rajendra Lokhande filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. Subsequently, the petitioner moved a praecipe for withdrawal of the petition, which was heavily objected to by the respondent's Additional Government Pleader, who argued that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Indira IVF Hospital Limited Medical Store, challenged the suspension of its license by the Assistant Commissioner, Drugs and License Authority under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The suspension order dated 28 August 2026 was served on the petitioner only on 31 August 2026, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners sought a direction to the Divisional Commissioner to register appeals against orders that invalidated their tribe claims. The State argued that the Commissioner was already registering the appeals. The petitioners relied on Section 6(b) of the relevant statute, which provides a …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Aarti Namdeo Gawali, Mukunda Balu Padale and Rahul Shaligram Ingle filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, to register appeals against orders that invalidated their claims of belonging to a Scheduled Tribe. The petitioners …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Aarti Namdeo Gawali, Mukunda Balu Padale and Rahul Shaligram Ingle filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, to register appeals against orders that invalidated their tribe claims. The State, through its AGP, informed the Court …
ABATED
The appellant, Dadarau @ Anil Bhagwan Ujgare, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, counsel for the appellant submitted a death certificate, indicating that the appellant had passed away. The court was required to determine whether the appeal …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the Civil Judge Junior Division, Dharur's order rejecting their application to frame a preliminary issue in a suit for declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction. The trial court held that the suit, valued at Rs.1,000 with a court fee of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners Rohidas Sahebrao Tajanpure and another filed an appeal against Order No. 19 of 2026 passed in Civil Applications No. 10016 and 2192 of 2026 filed by the respondents M/s Trymens Properties. The appeal sought a direction that the pending Regular Civil Appeal No. 166/2024 be decided …
DISPOSED OFF
Bhagwan Shankarrao Deshmukh and another, former school employees, filed a writ petition seeking accommodation near their former school and the release of pending salary. The petitioners submitted a communication dated 13‑Oct‑2025 showing they had been accommodated nearby, thereby satisfying the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that subsequent developments had rendered the petition infructuous. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition on that basis. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to the First Appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They contended that seeking enhancement of compensation is a statutory right and that the cross‑objections should be heard …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to the first appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that seeking enhanced compensation is a statutory right and that the cross‑objections should be heard on merit …
DISPOSED OFF
Laxman Raoji Bondhare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matter that was also the subject of an election petition. The petitioner, through counsel N. B. Patekar, argued that the writ petition should proceed. The Court noted that the election petition …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Shri Krishna Kachardas Somani and others, challenged an order dated 19.03.2016 of the Civil Judge Junior Division, Shevgaon, which dismissed their execution petition on the ground that the decree holder had alienated the suit property during the pendency of the proceedings. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Multiple petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals against the State of Maharashtra and an acquiring body. The petitioners argued that the merit of the award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, representing the Acquiring Body, filed an application to withdraw the compensation amount deposited with the Court following a land acquisition award. The Acquiring Body had already deposited the full awarded amount, whereas in related sister appeals only 75% had been deposited and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that seeking enhanced compensation is a statutory right and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, retired employees of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation, sought a notional annual increment and recalculation of their pension benefits under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, claiming they had served at least six months in the year preceding …
DISPOSED OFF
Vaijanath Shriram Sadavarte filed a writ petition challenging a suspension order dated 30 July 2026 issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. The petitioner sought relief against the order, alleging it to be unlawful. The High Court examined the petition and, rather than …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Prashant Bhagwansing Kachwa, was convicted and sentenced by a Judicial Magistrate on 11 July 2022, a sentence later confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 14 August 2026. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the substantive sentence and bail, arguing that he …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Sagar Shivaji Kadu and Mangesh Prakash Gholap, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 469 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 119(1), 118(1), 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. An interim protection order dated 26‑08‑2025 required …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay disposed a writ petition after a settlement was reached in Lok‑Adalat. A contempt petition was subsequently filed because the compensation awarded in the settlement was alleged not to have been paid. The Attorney General for the State submitted an affidavit stating that the …
DISMISSED
The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Project Division, Osmanabad appealed against a judgment and award dated 13 April 2010 in L.A.R. No.175 of 2007, which had enhanced compensation for land acquisition. The appellant argued that the reference court's enhancement did not exceed four times the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Dhupaji Chaguna Kapse and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 503 of 2011) against the State of Maharashtra and others. No petitioner appeared before the court on the hearing date. The respondent State filed an affidavit-in-reply indicating that the compensation amount had been …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Multiple petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals against the State of Maharashtra and an acquiring body. The petitioners argued that the merit of the award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that seeking enhanced compensation is a statutory right and that filing cross‑objections, rather than …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Appellant‑Acquiring Body appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against a 2012 award that granted the claimants enhanced compensation for a house acquired for the Turori Medium Project and ordered interest from the date of possession. The claimants had relied on a private …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Raghunath R. More, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue any appropriate legal remedy. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mahajan Sudhakar T., submitted the application for …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to the First Appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that the merit of the award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate appeals, was …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Riyazoddin Fatroddin Jamadar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined the appropriate forum for redress and directed the petitioner to approach the Grievance Committee constituted under the Government …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Abhijeet Ashok Deshpande and others, filed a writ petition challenging the failure of Respondent No.3 to decide their representation dated 07‑07‑2025 and a subsequent notice dated 09‑05‑2026. The High Court examined whether the respondent, a government authority, was obligated to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, representatives of the deceased Prabhavati Shankar Bhapkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking rental compensation from the State of Maharashtra. They had submitted representations on 1 August 2024, 7 July 2026 and 8 July 2026, which remained pending. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to decide a representation dated 19 January 2026, referring to an earlier order of this Court in Writ Petition No.12920 of 2025. The petition raised a simple, innocuous prayer for administrative action. The Court …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Appellant, an acquiring body, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against a reference court award that granted enhanced compensation, solatium and interest calculated from the date of possession of a house acquired for a public project. The reference court had relied …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for a missing girl. The court ordered a medical report, which indicated that doctors could not determine whether an abortion had taken place. The petitioner’s counsel later submitted that the prayer for the writ had become …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a civil surgeon, was transferred from Beed to Ahilyanagar and then, within a short period, to Udgir, which he claimed was a mid‑term transfer violating the Maharashtra Government Servants Regulation of Transfers Act. He filed an original application before the Maharashtra …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ganesh Uttam Hiwale, Dipak Uttam Hiwale and Dadarao Rambhau Hiwale filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They sought leave to withdraw the petitions so that they could pursue an appeal under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ganesh Uttam Hiwale, Dipak Uttam Hiwale and Dadarao Rambhau Hiwale filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They sought leave to withdraw the petitions so that they could pursue an appeal under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ganesh Uttam Hiwale, Dipak Uttam Hiwale and Dadarao Rambhau Hiwale filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They sought leave to withdraw the petitions so that they could pursue an appeal under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, …
Withdrawn
Amit Tadvi filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1317 of 2026 seeking parole. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition and to surrender, asking for liberty to file a fresh parole application thereafter. The State, through its A.P.P., indicated that surrender should precede any …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Vaishali K. Kadam and Vilas K. Landge filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, to register their appeals against orders that invalidated their tribe claims. The State of Maharashtra opposed the petitions. The petitioners relied …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajesh Laxmanrao Pawar, filed a writ petition (No. 11940 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, on the basis of a complaint lodged by Nivrutti Shankarrao Bangar. During the pendency of the petition, the committee that was to consider the complaint dismissed it. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Vaishali K. Kadam and Vilas K. Landge filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, to register their appeals against orders that invalidated their tribe claims. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief. The petitioners relied on a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, government servants of a medical college in Nanded and a Zilla Parishad employee in Beed, filed writ petitions challenging orders of a Scrutiny Committee that cancelled their caste/tribe certificates. They sought relief fearing adverse action by their employers. The Court held that, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, government servants of a medical college in Nanded and a Zilla Parishad employee in Beed, filed writ petitions challenging orders of a Scrutiny Committee that cancelled their caste/tribe certificates. They sought relief fearing adverse action by their employers. The Court held that, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, government servants of a medical college in Nanded and a Zilla Parishad employee in Beed, filed writ petitions challenging orders of a Scrutiny Committee that cancelled their caste/tribe certificates. They sought relief fearing adverse action by their employers. The Court held that, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, government servants of a medical college in Nanded and a Zilla Parishad employee in Beed, filed writ petitions challenging orders of a Scrutiny Committee that cancelled their caste/tribe certificates. They sought relief fearing adverse action by their employers. The Court held that, …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Kalpana alias Chandrakala Kondiba Shevte, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel, indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the petitioner then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pooja Limbaji Padgi (and similarly Rajkumar Limbaji Padgi), filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petitions and to file an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. The Bench, comprising …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pooja Limbaji Padgi (and similarly Rajkumar Limbaji Padgi), filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petitions and to file an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner. The Bench, comprising …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Rajendra Alias Raju Damu, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged sexual assault of a minor. The FIR was lodged …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, filed writ petitions seeking the benefit of the one‑step pay‑scale (Eksthar) as mandated by the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They argued that a prior coordinate bench order in Writ Petition No. 248 of 2026 had granted similar …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged the State Government's decision to discontinue the scheme of advance increments, arguing that earlier resolutions and circulars effected the discontinuation and that the 24 August 2017 resolution should operate retrospectively. The Court examined the 2009 Government …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Ravindra Raghunath Chavan and another, were arrested in connection with the suicide of a lineman following a long‑standing land dispute. The FIR alleged that the deceased was harassed and threatened by the petitioners, and a suicide note allegedly named them. The petitioners argued …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, a Talathi, was arrested on 18 August 2026 for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.70,000 in connection with a sand‑transportation case, as recorded in a pre‑trap operation. The prosecution presented recovered anthracene‑treated currency notes, a recorded conversation, and …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Sayyed Abdul Qudus Abdul Rashid, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed in the trial court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and requested …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Kalyan Dhondiram Dhapate, filed writ petition No. 10402 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. The petition remained pending for ten years without any appearance by the petitioner. On 26 March 2026, the …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for attempt to commit rape under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the IPC and for kidnapping under Section 452 IPC. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of the victim’s mother (PW‑2) and two neighbours (PW‑3 and PW‑4) who saw …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a permanent assistant teacher at a private school, challenged his termination under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. He argued that the School Tribunal rendered its judgment within a very short period after the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, represented by the legal heirs of the deceased Shivram Kundlik Arjunkar, filed a civil application against the State of Maharashtra and others. Their counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending application and to be allowed to file a fresh civil suit. The sole …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department regarding a stay application filed in revision. The High Court examined whether the department had unreasonably delayed adjudicating the stay application and the revision. The Court found …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Shaikh Pashu Shaikh Yaseen and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Divisional Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Chh. Sambhajinagar, regarding their Revision Application No. 29 of 2025. The Court examined whether …