Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 8001–8200

SURAJ ANIL PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

Suraj Anil Patel filed a criminal writ petition seeking Rs.10,00,000 compensation for alleged illegal detention from 22.08.2021 to 23.08.2021. The petitioner had been charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and a bailable warrant was ordered on 08.03.2021 after he failed to …

BHUSHAN BELAJI BORADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Bhushan Belaji Borade applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. The court, noting the change in …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHALANBAI RAJU JAGTAP AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal (No. 3821 of 2016) and a related civil application before the National Lok Adalat at the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench. The appellant accepted the award previously passed by the M.A.C.T., Ahmednagar in M.A.C.P. No. 228/2010 …

DNYANDEO BHAGWANTA YENAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, a police havildar, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and receiving Rs.1,000 as a bribe. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s testimony and a panch witness, but the defence argued that the money was …

RAMJI MANIKRAO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, a poor agriculturist, filed an application seeking condonation of a 2,294‑day delay in filing his first appeal against a judgment dated 12 April 2007. He argued that the delay was not deliberate, arising from his illiteracy, lack of legal knowledge, and communication gaps with his …

SAMBHAJI NARSINGH JAGTAPversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the Acquiring Body, which had deposited 50% of the award amount in the court as directed by a Reference Court. The issue was whether the applicants could withdraw the entire deposited sum along with accrued …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusR L STEELS AND ENERGY LIMITED

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The New India Assurance Co Ltd filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the remaining balance of funds deposited in the court’s office after an earlier order on 20 August 2026 allowed it to withdraw the amount to which it was entitled. The earlier order had already resulted in the …

DHONDIRAM RAMRAO SURYAWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

These cross-appeals arose from a common judgment and award dated 17 April 2008 of the Land Reference Court, Latur, in LAR Nos. 86, 88, 89, 92 and 252 of 2007. The claimants' lands in Gurnal, Taluka Deoni, District Latur, were acquired for construction of the Gurnal Storage Tank under a Section 4 …

Ambadas Anna shindeversusThe union of India Through The General Manager

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a civil application to have the legal heirs of two deceased persons, Ambadas Anna Shinde and Gayabai Ambadas Shinde, brought on record in pending proceedings. The heirs were unaware of the case, resulting in a delay in seeking their joinder. The court examined whether the delay …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ANRversusVINAYAK SHANKARRAO MANE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay—209 and 208 days respectively—for filing first appeals, citing the time taken to obtain directions from the Law and Judiciary Department. The learned Advocate General for the State argued that the delay was not …

OSAMA KHAN KALEEM KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered several anticipatory bail applications filed by individuals accused of assaulting an informant under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that 8‑10 persons, including the applicants, …

LAXMAN VITHOBA SHINDEversusFAKIRCHAND KEDARI KHANDEKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Laxman Vithoba Shinde filed a writ petition challenging an order of the District Collector that disqualified him under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. He had previously contested the same order before the Divisional Commissioner under Section 16 of the …

SHRIDHAR NARAYAN TAMBE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants, Shridhar Narayan Tambe and others, filed a criminal application which, during its pendency, was settled between the parties. The applicants' counsel sought to withdraw the application. The Court noted the settlement and the request for withdrawal. No substantive merits of the case …

SYED ALI SYED IBRAHIMversusTAHSILDAR SILLOD, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, represented by Ms. Fatema Kazi and Mr. S.S. Kazi, filed a writ petition (No. 4281 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Tahsildar, Sillod and others. During the proceedings, the petitioners applied for leave to withdraw the petition, …

ANIRUDDHA EKNATH LATPATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Aniruddha Eknath Latpate, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Superintendent of Police, Parbhani, consider a representation he submitted on 25 November 2016. He relied on a prior judgment of this Court (Writ Petition No.12966/2017) which held that interest at 12% per …

SATISH GAJANAN DUSANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Satish Gajanan Dusane filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal against a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, represented by Advocate Joydeep Chatterji, requested that the application for leave to appeal be fixed for final hearing at an early date. The Court, after …

SUNIL RAMDAS MAHAJAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants sought to be impleaded in writ petition No. 8964 of 2021 and to obtain appointment as Kendrapramukh in Zilla Parishad schools. They argued that earlier orders of the Court dated 17‑08‑2021 and 14‑08‑2026 prevented the Zilla Parishad from proceeding with such appointments. The Court …

Dhanshli Akash SurwaseversusAkash Annarao Surwase

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The wife filed a Section 24 CPC application seeking transfer of a custody suit (Civil M.A. No.11 of 2024) from the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nilanga (Latur) to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, citing the inconvenience of traveling 350 km with a minor child. The …

HIMMAT NAMDEO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The appellant, Himmat Patil, appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a 2016 Sessions case involving offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 324, 325 and 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the victims with sticks, an iron rod, an axe and a sword on 14 February …

Satish Daniel BhaleraoversusSujit Bhairu Jadhav

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Satish Daniel Bhalerao, filed a writ petition and a contempt petition against Sujit Bhairu Jadhav in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. S.R. Andhale, later instructed the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and …

GANESH VIJAY MEHERversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THR REVENUE DEPT AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ganesh Vijay Meher, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief concerning a representation he submitted on 10 August 2026. The representation was addressed to Respondent No. 2, the Union of India, and the petitioner sought a decision on its merits. The Court …

Purushottam Narayanrao BaradkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by several former government employees seeking correction of their pensionary benefits after superannuation. The petitioners argued that their pensions were calculated without including the annual increment in …

IBRAHIM DADABHAI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ibrahim Dadabhai Shaikh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in FIR No. 0832 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the POCSO Act, including alleged caste‑based abuse, outraging the modesty of a 17‑year‑old SC/ST victim …

Anantrao Vitthalrao SoudagarversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, former government employees, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pensionary benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment in their last drawn salary. The Court noted that the issue had …

Sanjay Prabhakarrao RampurkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of their last drawn salary, including the annual increment, and that …

Vinayak Keshavrao KalambarkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

A group of government employees filed several writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment in their last drawn salary. The petitioners sought the difference in pensionary …

Pandhari Shreepatrao WaranganeversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking recalculation of their pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should include the annual increment applicable to their last drawn salary before …

VITTHALSING NARAYANSINGH THAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The petitioner filed several contempt petitions (Nos. 415 of 2018, 89 of 2019, 284 of 2020, 285 of 2020) and criminal writ petitions (Nos. 423 of 2019, 1385 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought to withdraw all the petitions. The …

SHAIKH ASLAM SHAIKH KHUSHALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Shaikh Aslam Shaikh Khushal, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. After hearing, the court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The court granted the leave, …

DATTA BANSI PRADHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged a 2017 common judgment fixing compensation for dry land acquired in Devgaon Khavne, seeking a higher rate by relying on earlier awards: Rs.7586 per R from LAR No.457/2013, Rs.6000 per R from a National Lok Adalat settlement (First Appeal No.43/2023), and Rs.3700 per R from …

RUPSING SUBHASH RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Rupsing Subhash Rathod was convicted by the Special Sessions Judge, Latur, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for possession of 6 kg of ganja, receiving a two‑year imprisonment. He was the pillion rider on a motorcycle from which the narcotics were …

RAVIKUMAR VASUDEV RAJPALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Deepak Ramesh Chetwani, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1425 of 2026) along with a criminal application (No. 3596 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief, and both parties were represented by counsel. After …

MUJEEB ALIAS MUJAHED AYYUB QURESHI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were released on bail with a condition to attend the police station three times a week. One applicant sought relaxation of this condition for the dates 7th, 9th and 12th September 2026 due to his daughter's wedding. The prosecution, through a report dated 3rd September 2026, expressed …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The appellants filed criminal appeals challenging the trial proceedings after a charge-sheet was filed against the respondent. The respondent was subsequently granted regular bail. The appellants argued that the filing of the charge-sheet and the bail did not preclude the appeals, while the …

SURYA ALIAS SURYA SONYA BHAVAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Surya Bhavare, was convicted under Section 326 IPC for assault with an axe causing a skull fracture and sentenced to three years and six months imprisonment. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 729 of …

GANESH HARI DASversusMANOHAR GANPATRAO SAPATE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ganesh Hari Das, filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of an earlier order. He later submitted a letter dated 10 September 2026 stating that he had complied with the contempt order and requested the withdrawal of the petition. The court took the letter on record and, after …

RAKESH RAMESH KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …

RAHUL KISHOR PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Rahul Kishor Patil filed a writ petition fearing loss of his admission to an M.Tech program because he could not produce a Scheduled Tribe validity certificate, whereas a vigilance report had been accepted for his brother. He alleged inaction by the committee handling his case and sought …

VASANT RAMBHAU BHADANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vasant Rambhau Bhadane, was appointed as Mistri Grade‑II in 1983 and was placed on a time‑bound pay scale in 1995, becoming eligible for a higher pay scale from December 2007. Despite this entitlement, he was not paid the benefits of the second time‑bound scale before his retirement …

Mahadeo Krishana Bhanduge Died Through His Lrs Chandrakala Mahadeo Bhandurge Dead And OthersversusThe State of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, heirs of the deceased Mahadeo Krishana Bhanduge, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of Rs.10,48,261 deposited by the acquiring body. The court noted a prior order in First Appeal (St.) No.15473 of 2024 allowing a similar withdrawal and, for consistency, ordered the same …

Gena Anna Rama Kasab Died Through His LRs Dagadabai Gena Kasab Died Sakhubai and OthersversusThe State of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad Dist Osmanabad

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Gena Anna Rama Kasab, sought to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the Acquiring Body in the court, along with accrued interest, against the State of Maharashtra. The State opposed the withdrawal, arguing that only 50% of the amount had been deposited as …

Savala So Tayappa Jadhav Died Through his LRs Malan Savala Jadhav Since Deceased and OthersversusThe State of Maharashtra Through Collector Osmanabad At Osmanabad

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed a civil application (No. 10161 of 2026) seeking deletion of the name of Applicant No.1, who had died on 16 December 2025, from all proceedings before the Court. The Court accepted the death certificate and allowed the deletion, directing it be effected within a week. In a …

SURESH AMBARNATH LONDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISMISSED

The applicant, Suresh Ambarnath Londhe, was convicted under Section 500 IPC for defamation based on letters, pamphlets, and a public display alleging fraud by the complainant. He appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial was conducted as a summary trial and that the successor magistrate …

URMILA GANPATRAO PANDHAREversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Urmila Ganpatrao Pandhare applied to the Bombay High Court seeking to withdraw the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The court examined the tribunal's endorsement of the applicant's entitlement and the competing interests of the parties. It allowed a …

NANA BHAGWAN BANGAR AND OTHERSversusMACHINDRA APPARAO ANDHARE

DISPOSED OFF

The writ petition was dismissed on 18.08.2026 for want of prosecution, with the court noting the petitioner had lost interest and made an incorrect statement about a stay. The petitioner subsequently filed a civil application seeking recall of that dismissal order. Neither the petitioner nor any …

BHIMRAO KISHANRAO UGHADE AND OTHERSversusBHAUSAHEB SADU HIWALE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …

UTTAM DHARMA KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner Uttam Dharma Koli filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for an effective investigation into FIR No.15 of 2023 registered at Raver Police Station, Jalgaon. The Court examined the petition and noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in respect of the FIR and that a …

YOGESH SUBHASH ANNADATEversusPUNJABAI BHAGAJI PERE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petition was filed challenging an order dated 10 August 2023 passed by an Adhoc District Judge in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 39 of 2022, which arose from an order in Special Civil Suit No. 17 of 2022. While the writ petition was pending, the trial court disposed of the underlying Special …

GOVIND BALAJI LONEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Govind Balaji Lone, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the delay by the Education Officer in deciding a proposal dated 24 August 2026. The petitioner sought a directive for a timely decision, alleging that the delay violated his statutory rights. The Court …

VISHWAJIT KISHANLAL SHARMAversusLEELA KISHANLAL SHARMA DIED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of writ petitions numbered 1468 of 2025 to 14662 of 2025. The court issued practical directions ordering the petitioners to take necessary steps within four weeks, failing which the petitions would be dismissed. It directed that notice be …

MADHAV RAMRAO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Madhav Ramrao Shinde applied for anticipatory bail before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already surrendered to the police. Consequently, the court found that there was no longer any ground for …

MAULA KHAN WAHAB KHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Maula Khan Waheb Khan Pathan, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution lodged a charge sheet. The petitioner, through his counsel, sought to withdraw the bail application and requested …

PRASHANT BHASKAR WAGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

RULE DISCHARGED

The petitioner, Prashant Bhaskar Wagh, sought to quash several notices and orders issued by various state officials and to restrain them from taking possession of his properties, claiming the notices were illegal and beyond jurisdiction. He specifically requested an interim stay of a notice dated …

AARTI NAMDEO GAWALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought a direction to the Divisional Commissioner to register appeals against orders that invalidated their tribe claims. The State argued that the Commissioner was already registering the appeals. The petitioners relied on Section 6(b) of the relevant statute, which provides a …

RAHUL SHALIGRAM INGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Aarti Namdeo Gawali, Mukunda Balu Padale and Rahul Shaligram Ingle filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, to register appeals against orders that invalidated their claims of belonging to a Scheduled Tribe. The petitioners …

MUKUNDA BALU PADALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Aarti Namdeo Gawali, Mukunda Balu Padale and Rahul Shaligram Ingle filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, to register appeals against orders that invalidated their tribe claims. The State, through its AGP, informed the Court …

DADARAO @ ANIL BHAGWAN UJGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABATED

The appellant, Dadarau @ Anil Bhagwan Ujgare, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, counsel for the appellant submitted a death certificate, indicating that the appellant had passed away. The court was required to determine whether the appeal …

SHRIKRISHNA KACHARDAS SOMANI AND OTHERSversusJANARDHAN SHANKAR DHAS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Shri Krishna Kachardas Somani and others, challenged an order dated 19.03.2016 of the Civil Judge Junior Division, Shevgaon, which dismissed their execution petition on the ground that the decree holder had alienated the suit property during the pendency of the proceedings. The …

SHYAMRAO SIDRAM PATIL.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals filed by the acquiring body concerning compensation awards. They argued that seeking enhanced compensation is a statutory right and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate …

PRASHANT BHAGWANSING KACHWAversusSANTKUMAR BHALCHANDRA JAIN

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Prashant Bhagwansing Kachwa, was convicted and sentenced by a Judicial Magistrate on 11 July 2022, a sentence later confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on 14 August 2026. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the substantive sentence and bail, arguing that he …

NILESH GITARAM GHOLAPversusSAGAR SHIVAJI KADU AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Sagar Shivaji Kadu and Mangesh Prakash Gholap, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 469 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 119(1), 118(1), 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. An interim protection order dated 26‑08‑2025 required …

MARUTI BALA KAPSE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay disposed a writ petition after a settlement was reached in Lok‑Adalat. A contempt petition was subsequently filed because the compensation awarded in the settlement was alleged not to have been paid. The Attorney General for the State submitted an affidavit stating that the …

DHUPAJI CHAGUNA KAPSE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Dhupaji Chaguna Kapse and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 503 of 2011) against the State of Maharashtra and others. No petitioner appeared before the court on the hearing date. The respondent State filed an affidavit-in-reply indicating that the compensation amount had been …

EKNATH RANGRAO HAKE.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Multiple petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections to first appeals against the State of Maharashtra and an acquiring body. The petitioners argued that the merit of the award was under challenge and that filing cross‑objections, rather than separate …

RAGHUNATH RAMBHAU MOREversusBABITA MAHENDRA TAJANE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Raghunath R. More, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue any appropriate legal remedy. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mahajan Sudhakar T., submitted the application for …

KIRAN CHANDAN RUNWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus for a missing girl. The court ordered a medical report, which indicated that doctors could not determine whether an abortion had taken place. The petitioner’s counsel later submitted that the prayer for the writ had become …

DIPAK UTTAM HIWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Ganesh Uttam Hiwale, Dipak Uttam Hiwale and Dadarao Rambhau Hiwale filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. They sought leave to withdraw the petitions so that they could pursue an appeal under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, …

AMIT LALKHA TADVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Amit Tadvi filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1317 of 2026 seeking parole. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition and to surrender, asking for liberty to file a fresh parole application thereafter. The State, through its A.P.P., indicated that surrender should precede any …

KALPANA ALIAS CHANDRAKALA KONDIBA SHEVTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Kalpana alias Chandrakala Kondiba Shevte, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court, after hearing counsel, indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the petitioner then sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The …

RAVINDRA RAGHUNATH CHAVAN AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Ravindra Raghunath Chavan and another, were arrested in connection with the suicide of a lineman following a long‑standing land dispute. The FIR alleged that the deceased was harassed and threatened by the petitioners, and a suicide note allegedly named them. The petitioners argued …

VILAS RAJENDRA MORALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, a Talathi, was arrested on 18 August 2026 for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.70,000 in connection with a sand‑transportation case, as recorded in a pre‑trap operation. The prosecution presented recovered anthracene‑treated currency notes, a recorded conversation, and …

SAYYED ABDUL QUDUS ABDUL RASHIDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sayyed Abdul Qudus Abdul Rashid, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet was filed in the trial court. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and requested …

MARUTI JALINDAR SARVADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for attempt to commit rape under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the IPC and for kidnapping under Section 452 IPC. The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of the victim’s mother (PW‑2) and two neighbours (PW‑3 and PW‑4) who saw …