Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 8201–8400

MAHADEO S/O PRABHAKAR DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Mahadeo Deshmukh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 326 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting his wife, daughter and others with a sickle in April 2015. The trial court relied mainly on the police report, medical expert testimony …

SANJAY ALIAS PANDHARI DIGAMBAR PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Dattaprabhu Baburao Pawar and Sanjay Alias Pandhari Digambar Pawar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 308(2), 308(3) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged extortion involving an obscene video of a complainant's wife. The FIR was …

BASLING SHANTLING TAGDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to pass a compensation award under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondent’s Attorney General argued that a Section 19 …

SHIVANI SANJAY JOSHIversusTHE ZONAL MANAGER BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Shivani Sanjay Joshi filed a writ petition (No. 11289 of 2022) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Zonal Manager of Bank of India and another respondent. After hearing the matter on its merits, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the …

MADHAV TUKARAM PHADversusVIKAS RAMKISHAN RENGE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Parbhani, which allowed the respondent's application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure to appoint a commissioner. The civil suit involved a claim for declaration and …

LINGESHWAR SIDDHESHWARAPPA KHURPEversusSUREKHA LINGEWHAR KHURPE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Lingeshwar Siddheshwarappa Khurpe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later instructed his counsel to withdraw the petition. The learned advocate submitted the written instructions to the court seeking withdrawal. The court considered …

MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAVAversusDAGDU PANDU SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

In Contempt Petition No. 742 of 2015 arising out of WP/10066/2014, the petitioners alleged that the respondents had not paid the compensation due to them. The learned Additional Government Pleader initially claimed the petitioners were not coming to accept the compensation, but later produced …

SUMIT SANJAY POL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Sumit Sanjay Pol and others, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation of Crime No. 213 of 2022, registered at City Police Station, Jalgaon. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the transfer and argued that the matter was already before the …

SANDIP KISHAN KOKATE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants, Sandip Kishan Kokate and others, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement and the applicants sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the applicants moved …

AJITKUMAR PATILSAHEB DENGALEversusBHAGWAT CHANDRBHAN DHOKCHOULE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant filed a writ petition which the High Court dismissed for want of prosecution because he failed to supply spare copies for notice within the time prescribed, as ordered on 27 July 2026. The applicant subsequently filed a civil application 38 days after the dismissal, claiming that his …

PRAVIN VASANTRAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Pravin Vasantrao Pawar, filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1528 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The court, after reviewing the report of its Resource Personnel, noted that a charge-sheet in the underlying …

ANIL YASHWANT KARDURE AND ANOTHERversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Anil Yashwant Kardure and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority and the Collector of Osmanabad to pass a fresh award because their names were omitted from an earlier compensation award. They alleged that compensation had been paid …

KISHAN IRBAJI KHANDREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, headmaster of an Ashram school, sought quashment of an FIR and charge‑sheet filed under Sections 306 r/w 34 IPC and Section 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act alleging his involvement in a girl’s suicide. The prosecution alleged the applicant concealed the victim’s condition and harassed her, while …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusRAGHUNATH NARAYAN CHAURE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgment of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Nagar Bypass Road, treating the lands as non‑agricultural. The State argued that the lands, shown in the Urban Development Plan’s Green …

VISHNU S/O. ASARAM KANADEversusVISHAL S/O. VISHNU KANADE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vishnu S/o Asaram Kanade filed Criminal Application No. 3126 of 2019 seeking revision against Vishal S/o Vishnu Kanade and others. During the pendency, the related Family Court matters (Case Nos. 07/2019 and 09/2017) were concluded, and the Family Court order dated 22 October 2021 was produced. The …

ONKAR TANAJI KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Onkar Kale, a 24‑year‑old student, was convicted by the Special Fast Track Court, Dharashiv, for a serious offence involving a minor victim. He applied to the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal, arguing that the prosecution’s evidence on …

Nikhil Sakharam ChavhanversusDIVISIONAL CONTROLLAR MSRTC, AURANGABAD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Nikhil Sakharam Chavhan, filed an application before the Bombay High Court seeking to withdraw the compensation amount that had been awarded by a Tribunal and deposited by an insurance company. The Tribunal had endorsed the applicant’s entitlement after hearing the rival contentions …

NEHA JITENDRA AGRWAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioners, including Neha Jitendra Agrawal, filed Criminal Application No. 3663 of 2026 (and earlier No. 3891 of 2023) against the State of Maharashtra. The applications sought relief under the prayer clause (B), presumably for amendment of pleadings or procedural orders. The High Court, after …

HEMLATA MANIKCHAND CHUDIWALversusGTL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (GIL) AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Hemlata Manikchand Chudiwal filed an arbitration appeal (Arbitration Appeal No. 36 of 2025) challenging an order and contended that the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not maintainable. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal while preserving the …

HARSHAL KISHOR SAPKALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Harshal Kishor Sapkale, filed a civil application seeking permission to appear for the summer 2026 MBBS examination and to continue his studies, relying on a prior interim order that allowed his admission pending a caste claim. The High Court noted that the petitioner repeatedly …

ASHOK APPASAHEB MATKARversusTUKARAM DNYANOBA KACHGUNDE AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Tukaram Dnyanoba Kachgunde applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged assault on informant Ashok on 28 June 2026, for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant claimed the applicant sat on his chest and throttled him, while co‑accused used iron …

SANJAY RAMDAS TAVADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sanjay Ramdas Tavade, filed a writ petition (No. 10203 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Abhay R. Nimbalkar, appeared on his behalf. During the hearing, the learned …

RAJSHREE BHAGWAN BELAMBEversusBRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Rajshree Bhagwan Belambe, sought to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The tribunal had previously endorsed the applicants' entitlement after considering the rival contentions. The High Court examined whether the …

VAISHALI YUVRAJ WAGH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Vaishali Yuvraj Wagh and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the arbitrator (Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division) to decide Arbitration Case No. 51 of 2012. The petition alleged undue delay in the arbitral proceedings. The …

SHEELA SAMBHA DEOKATE AND ANOTHERversusSAMBHA BAPURAO DEOKATE AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

In a civil application filed by Sheela Sambha Deokate and another, the applicants sought to serve notice on Respondent No.4, who had not been served by the regular mode of service. The applicants prayed for service by way of paper publication in a daily newspaper. The learned counsel for the …

DATTAPRABHU BABURAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Dattaprabhu Baburao Pawar and Sanjay Alias Pandhari Digambar Pawar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an extortion case involving an obscene video of the informant's wife. The FIR, lodged on 3 August 2026, alleged that the applicants threatened the informant to pay …

ASHUTOSH SURESH ZAREversusHARSHADA ASHUTOSH ZARE

DISPOSED OFF

The husband appealed to the High Court seeking to quash two orders of the Family Court, Dhule, which had enhanced his maintenance liability to Rs.7,000 per month for his wife and second child under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. The wife had earlier obtained Rs.3,000 per month each for herself and her …

UDAY APPASAHEB DESHMUKH AND OTHERSversusTHE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that the Collector's office had failed to register their appeal. The Government Pleader argued that the maintainability of the appeal could be decided in the appeal itself and promised to instruct the Collector to register the appeal and decide it on …

SITARAM BABURAO JAGTAP ALIAS BHAUSAHEB SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The accused, Sitaram Baburao Jagtap alias Bhausaheb Salve, was convicted on 28 June 2017 and filed an appeal after a delay of 3,285 days, seeking condonation of the delay. The State of Maharashtra opposed the condonation, relying on Supreme Court judgments in State of M.P. v. Saleem alias Chamaru …

VIJAY VASANTRAO MANEKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioners filed criminal applications seeking restoration of original criminal proceedings that had been dismissed because they failed to comply with a court order to amend the pleadings within the stipulated time. The petitioners assured the court that the required amendment would be …

VIKRANT VIJAY MANEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioners filed criminal applications seeking restoration of original criminal proceedings that had been dismissed because they failed to comply with a court order to amend the pleadings within the stipulated time. The petitioners assured the court that the required amendment would be …

SUBHASH AHSOK KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Subhash Ahsok Koli filed a criminal writ petition seeking the transfer of the investigation of Crime No. 127 of 2023, registered at Erandol Police Station, to the CBI or CID. The Court observed that a Sessions case (No. 184 of 2023) was already pending before the Sessions Judge, rendering …

DADASAHEB S/O. KUSHABAPU PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Dadasaheb Pawar filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to Dairy Development Officers and the Superintendent of Police to initiate criminal action against three contractors (respondents 5‑7) based on a 7 June 2019 committee report that alleged irregularities. A later committee report …

Popat Sakharam JadhavversusChandu Shantaram Choudhari

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Popat Sakharm Jadav was terminated on 03‑12‑2002 and successfully challenged the termination in IDA No.18/2016, obtaining an order for reinstatement with 50% back wages. The employer appealed that order before the Bombay High Court (Writ Petition No.14322 of 2023), which was dismissed on …

GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION T/H EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MID, JALNA AND ANO..versusBALU VITHOBA JAGDALE (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. LAXMI BALU JAGDALE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) considered applications filed by the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (the acquiring body) seeking condonation of delays in filing first appeals and a stay of several judgments and awards passed by the Reference Court in multiple …

BALIRAM ASARAM KALAMKARversusTEH STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Court considered two criminal applications filed by members of a family seeking quash of FIR No. 317 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties submitted consent terms indicating that the husband and …

RAJENDRA BANSI DOKHEversusREKHA RAJENDRA DOKHE AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant sought to quash a Family Court order directing him to pay maintenance of Rs.5,000 per month to his son until further orders, arguing that the son had attained majority and all arrears had been paid. The respondents contended that the proper remedy was a modification application under …

RAJENDRA BANSI DOKHEversusREKHA RAJENDRA DOKHE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rajendra Bansi Dokhe, filed Criminal Application No. 3443 of 2023 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against respondents Rekha Rajendra Dokhe and another. The application was initially not placed on the court's board for consideration. Upon the …

GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION T/H EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MID, JALNA AND ANO..versusSAVITRIBAI GANPAT GHADGE (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. BHIMRAO GANPAT GHADGE AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (the Acquiring Body) filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals, alleging procedural changes caused the delays. The Court examined whether the delays of 110 to 169 days could be condoned under the …

BALU SHANKARRAO PATODEversusNARAYAN MARUTI WATTAMWAR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Balu Shankarrao Patode, challenged the order of the Joint Civil Judge that impleaded Respondent No.2 in his specific performance suit against Respondent No.1 concerning a sale of a property in Udgir. The petitioner argued that Respondent No.2 was a stranger to the contract and that …

WASIM KHAN MUNSAF KHAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel requested to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a discharge application. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty. It directed …

SHAIKH MOHAMMAD ISMAIL AND ANRversusSOPAN SONAJI GORE AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Shaikh Mohammad Ismail and another, filed a petition in the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of a seven‑day delay in filing an appeal against a judgment dated 21‑06‑2024 of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune‑2. The appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period, and the …

MATIN ABDUL GAFFAR SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Matin Abdul Gaffar Shaikh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both parties were represented, and the court expressed reluctance to grant bail. On the instructions of the applicant, counsel sought to withdraw the application. The court entertained …

MANSUR HUSAIN DALALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mansur Husain Dalal, a broker who introduced the informant to co‑accused in a complex real‑estate fraud involving the takeover of two subsidiary companies. The informant alleged that the co‑accused forged documents, misappropriated …

FIROJ KHAN MAHEMUD KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Firoj Khan Mahemud Khan applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged receipt of contraband gutka and pan masala seized from co‑accused. The offences are punishable under Sections 123, 223, 274, 275 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 59 of the Food …

FAIYYAZ ALTAF DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, a bank manager, filed an anticipatory bail application claiming that the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, particularly sections 83, 84 and 104, rendered the FIR against him untenable and that any dispute should be resolved by arbitration under the Act. He further argued that he …

SUSHIL LAXMAN THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The appellant, Sushil Laxman Thorat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, in Sessions Case No.62 of 2023 for offences under Sections 353, 332 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving a six‑month imprisonment, of which he had already served two months. He filed a criminal …

SHASHIKANT @ SACHIN RAOSAHEB GAIKWAD.versusSINGARA SINGH HARNAMSINGH AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a civil application seeking to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by an insurance company. The court examined the tribunal's endorsement of the applicant's entitlement and the competing interests of the parties. It held that allowing a …

SIKANDAR EKBAL PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Sikandar Ekbal Patel filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a disinclination to grant bail. Consequently, the applicant, on his counsel's …

BHASKAR GANGADHR SOLASE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The three Solase applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 695/2024 alleging assault on an informant and witnesses on 6 July 2024. The FIR was lodged five months later, on 19 December 2025, raising doubts about the informant's version and the possibility of false implication. …

VAIJNATH TRIMBAKRAO ZARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vainath Trimbakrao Zarkar filed Writ Petition No. 10171 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Pathan Ziya J., holding the file of G.R. Syed. The State was represented by Advocate …

PADMASHREE DR. VITTHALRAO VIKHE PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD., TRHU. ABHIJIT ARJUNRAO DIGHEversusTHE AHMEDNAGAR DISTIRCT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD. THRU. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered two contempt petitions filed by Padmashree Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. alleging that the respondent sugar factory had violated an interim arbitration order dated 2 September 2024 by creating mortgages over suit property and failing to furnish a …

PADMASHREE DR. VITTHALRAO VIKHE PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD., TRHU. ABHIJIT ARJUNRAO DIGHEversusTHE SHRI. GANESH SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. THRU ITS INCHARGE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR.

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered two contempt petitions filed by Padmashree Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. alleging that the respondent sugar factory violated an interim arbitration order dated 2 September 2024, which restrained the creation of third‑party interests over certain …

JYOTI RAHUL BANSODEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Jyoti Rahul Bansode, filed Criminal Application No. 3686 of 2026 seeking restoration of his anticipatory bail (Application No. 1188 of 2026) and an extension of time to deposit the security amount ordered on 03.08.2026. The State of Maharashtra opposed the relief. The Court examined …

PRATIBHA BHALCHANDRA KAVALE AND OTHERSversusANITA RAJKUMAR KHATKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

In Special Civil Suit No.128 of 2017, the death of a defendant led to the admission of his legal representatives and a will deed, prompting the plaintiff to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The defendants then sought to amend their written statement to meet the amended plaint, but the …

KIRAN CHANDAR SASANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Kiran Chandar Sasane, filed a criminal revision application (St. No.184 of 2013) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant’s counsel submitted that the revision had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and ordered the revision application to be …

RAJSHREE BHAGWAN BELAMBEversusBRANER NATIONAL INSURANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Rajshree Bhagwan Belambe, filed two civil applications seeking to withdraw the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The High Court examined the tribunal's endorsement of the applicants' entitlement and the competing interests of the parties. …

PRASHANT ALIAS PRASAD BANDU GAVLI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioners, Prashant alias Prasad Bandu Gavli and another, filed an application seeking restoration of anticipatory bail after an order dated 8 July 2026 dismissed their earlier application for want of prosecution. The State opposed the application. The Court, after hearing both sides, found …

SONYABAPU LAXMAN BACHKAR AND OTHERSversusSWATI RAJARAM TAKPERE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought a writ challenging an order of the Civil Court that granted police protection to the respondents for a specific date, 15/03/2021. The petitioners argued that since the protected date had already passed, the petition had become moot. The respondents' reply confirmed that the …

Ujawala Satish KantodeversusThe Divisional Manager

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Ujawala Satish Kantode and others, sought a court order to withdraw the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by the National Insurance Company Ltd. The insurance company appealed, objecting to the tribunal's award, but had already deposited the amount as per the court's …

CHAYA GANPAT THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Chaya Ganpat Thorat, filed writ petition No. 12665 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a decision on a proposal dated 25 March 2025. The petition alleged that Respondent No. 5 had not yet decided the proposal, causing prejudice. The Court examined the …

VASANT NARAYAN CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vasant Narayan Chaudhari, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. A. R. Sayed, submitted a vakalatnama and a pursis indicating the …

NITIN DEVRAM SAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nitin Devram Sake, sought condonation of delay in filing a review of the High Court's order dated 27 November 2025 in Writ Petition No. 11649 of 2025. The review raised the claim that a bank guarantee was never provided and that an amount was deducted without any policy or rule. The …

Ajhar Ali Ejaj AliversusRajiv Rathod Sukhlal Rathod

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Ajhar Ali Ejaj Ali and Arbaz ShamuHammad Pathan, filed civil applications seeking to withdraw a portion of the compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by an insurance company. The court examined the tribunal's endorsement of the applicants' entitlement after considering the …

Arbaz Shamuhammad PathanversusRajiv Rathod Sukhlal Rathod

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Ajhar Ali Ejaj Ali and Arbaz Shamuammad Pathan, filed civil applications seeking to withdraw a portion of compensation awarded by a tribunal and deposited by an insurance company. The issue before the court was whether the applicants could be permitted to withdraw any part of the …

MANGALA MOHANRAO UNAHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, an 80‑year‑old woman, filed a criminal application seeking an expeditious decision in R.C.C. No. 221 of 2019 pending before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, on the ground that her advanced age necessitated a swift resolution. The applicant’s counsel argued that the …

ANITA SHIVAJI SHINDE AND ORSversusBHAPUSAHEB KACHARU TODMAL AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Anita Shivaji Shinde and others, filed a civil application before the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of a 243‑day delay in filing their first appeal against a motor accident claim petition. The respondents, Bhapusaheb Kacharu Todmal and others, opposed …

NILESH RAJENDRA TARKASE AND ANOTHERversusPRAKASH BACHHAV

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Nilesh Rajendra Tarkase and another, filed a contempt petition in 2017 but failed to engage any counsel despite ample opportunity. The Court observed that the petitioners showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of …

AJAY MOHAN BENDWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, Ajay Mohan Bendwal, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case involving alleged assault with an axe, citing sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 189(4), 191(2) and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the investigation had concluded with a …

SHAIKH FEROZ SHAIKH RAFIQversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A criminal writ petition (No. 1503 of 2022) was filed by Shaikh Feroz Shaikh Rafiq against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. M. K. Bhosale, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The respondents, represented by Mr. A. S. Shinde, made no …

POPAT BAPU DEVKAR AND OTHERSversusDATTU LAXMAN DEVKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, owners of Gut Nos.364, 365, 366, 355 and 357 in Mahindrawadi, challenged a Deputy Collector's order that accepted their objection only for Gut No.367 and withheld compensation for the other gut numbers. The High Court had earlier granted interim relief restraining the release of …

MAMTA @ PUNAM RAJENDRA PATIL AND ORSversusRAEESABI RAMZAN PATEL AND ANR

DISMISSED

The appellants filed a First Appeal No. 674 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel for the appellants requested the withdrawal, and the court entertained the request. The court ordered that the First Appeal stands dismissed as …

JALINDARSING JABARSING PAWARversusBHIKAN CHINDHA MARATHE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Jalindarsing Jabarsing Pawar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the passage of time had rendered the petition …

ISMAIL BAIG MIRZA ISAM BAIG AND OTHERSversusBABURAO BAPURAO WARKAD

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a group of family members, claimed that a 4‑acre agricultural inam land in Aurangabad was illegally sold in 1968 without the prior permission required under the Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954. They sought cancellation of the sale deed and mutation under …