Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 8401–8600

Kavita Suresh SonawaneversusTHE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by The New India Insurance Company in the court pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The respondent opposed, arguing that the tribunal had not properly considered the deceased's contributory negligence in the …

THE STAE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusKISHAN RAMRAO BIRADAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank at Sukni village. The State contended that the compensation rates of Rs.3100 per R for non‑irrigated land and Rs.4650 per R for irrigated land …

YADAVRAO SHANKARRAO SOMWANSHI DIEDversusSAMBHAJIRAO SHIVAJIRAO SOMWANSHI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay for filing petitions to bring various legal representatives of parties on record and to add respondents in a second appeal. Delays ranged from 148 days to over 4,400 days. The court examined the reasons for delay …

YADAVRAO SHANKARRAO SOMWANSHI DIEDversusSAMBHAJIRAO SHIVAJIRAO SOMWANSHI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay for filing applications to bring various legal representatives of deceased parties on record and to add respondents as parties in a second appeal. The delays ranged from 148 days to …

THE STATE OF MAH THR. COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANRversusASHOK HIRAJI DEOKARE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Land Reference Court's award of compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank at Sukni, Latur. The claimants argued that the court correctly applied a 10% escalation based on sale exemplars predating the acquisition …

YADAVRAO SHANKARRAO SOMWANSHI DIEDversusSAMBHAJIRAO SHIVAJIRAO SOMWANSHI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay for filing pleadings to bring various legal representatives and parties on record, with delays ranging from 148 to 4,430 days. The applications also sought permission to add respondents as parties in a second …

YADAVRAO SHANKARRAO SOMWANSHI DIEDversusSAMBHAJIRAO SHIVAJIRAO SOMWANSHI

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay for filing applications to bring various legal representatives of parties on record and to add respondents in a second appeal. The delays ranged from 148 days to over 4,400 days, and the …

Swarajya Mathadi General Kamgar SanghatanaversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Swrajya Mathadi General Kamgar Sanghatana, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in decision on its representation dated 06/06/2026 filed with respondent No.3 of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought a judicial direction that the respondent decide the representation on …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusHANSRAJ PANDURANG BIRADAR AND ANR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to a group of agricultural claimants whose lands were acquired for a minor irrigation tank. The claimants had been awarded Rs.3100 per R for non‑irrigated land and Rs.4650 per R for …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSAIDURAM BAPURAO BIRADAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank. The claimants argued that the compensation, based on sale exemplars, was correctly increased by 10% for escalation …

THE MAHARASHTRA KRUSHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THR EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORSversusSHAHAJI VITHOBA SHIRSAT WITH CONSENT NAMDEO BABU GANJE DEAD THR LRS VANITA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Maharashtra Krushna Valley Development Corporation appealed the compensation awards granted by the Reference Court for land acquired in 1999 for the Sangli Malumbra irrigation tank. The court had fixed compensation rates after applying a 40% deduction based on a sale of land 8 km away, and had …

NANDINI MORILAL DALVIversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AURANGABAD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The United India Insurance Company appealed a tribunal award and deposited the compensation amount awarded to the claimants. The applicant, now a majority adult, filed a civil application seeking to withdraw a portion of the deposited compensation as apportioned by the tribunal. The court examined …

RUCHA SAMADHAN KULKARNIversusSAMADHAN ANANTRAO KULKARNI

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The wife, Rucha Kulkarni, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 117‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal against her husband, Samadhan Kulkarni. The husband’s counsel was absent, and the wife’s counsel, S. B. Kendre, appeared before the bench. The sole issue was whether the court …

PRASHANT GORAKHNATH JADHAV.versusRAFIQ MAQBOOL TAMBOLI AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioner, Prashant Gorakhnath Jadhav, filed Civil Application No. 10768 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Rafiq Maqbool Tamboli and another. The application sought reliefs enumerated in prayer clauses B and C. The learned Judge, Justice Sachin S. …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPRAVIN SHANTARM MAHALE AND ANR.

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of an Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector (accused No.1) and a private individual (accused No.2) who were charged under sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a bribe of Rs.2,600 to issue driving licences. The …

SHARDA RAJENDRA AAJBEversusSAURABH VIJAY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Sharda Rajendra Aajbe filed a contempt petition against the Secretary of the Maharashtra State Higher and Technical Education Mantralaya. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after noting compliance, disposed of the contempt petition …

GANESH ASHOKRAO KAWADE PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ganesh Ashokrao Kawade Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner had submitted three representations dated 15 June 2026, 10 July 2026 and 31 July 2026 to the Divisional Joint Registrar, …

PRASHANT MADHUKAR GHANEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a government employee, was served a show-cause notice for alleged failure to submit a caste validity certificate within six months of his appointment, leading to a termination order dated 21 July 2026. He filed a writ petition seeking quash of the order and direction to the Committee …

SUVARNA SOUDAGAR PATANGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking a stay of the order, arguing that the newly appointed Divisional Commissioner as appellate authority had not commenced work and that the order failed to mention the protection period …

GAJANAN SOUDAGAR PATANGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A group of petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their caste certificates and seeking a stay of the order pending appeal to the Divisional Commissioner appointed as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026. They argued that the order …

KIRAN MAROTI SOMWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A group of writ petitions were filed by individuals whose caste certificates had been cancelled by a Scrutiny Committee, seeking a stay of the order and direction to the Divisional Commissioner, appointed as Appellate Authority under Section 6B of the Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 2026, to commence …

SIDHESHWAR KISAN GHATULversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions for the Government to absorb them into regular service. The Court examined whether any right had accrued to the petitioners to …

GANESH DEVIDAS KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that the Government absorb them into regular service. The Court noted that their engagement was limited to a specific scheme and that …

KIRAN BALU GANGURDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant Kiran Balu Gangurde filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh …

BHARAT AATMARAM DAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA), filed writ petitions seeking a direction that the Government absorb them into regular service. They contended that their employment under the scheme gave them a …

SHAIKH ATHAR SHAIKH AKHTARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, was hearing two anticipatory bail applications, No. 1742 of 2026 filed by Shaikh Athar Shaikh Akhtar and No. 1743 of 2026 filed by Saleem Murtuza Shaikh, both against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought anticipatory bail pending investigation. …

SALEEM MURTUZA SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two anticipatory bail applications filed by Shaikh Athar Shaikh Akhtar and Saleem Murtuza Shaikh against the State of Maharashtra. After hearing counsel for both sides, the court expressed reluctance to grant any relief. Subsequently, the applicants' …

BALAI RAMCHANDRA PATNE AND ANOTHERSversusRAOSAHEB BABARAO HINGOLE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 10886 of 2015 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was presented before Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh. On the petitioners' instructions, counsel Mr. G. N. Chincholkar submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court recorded …

BALASAHEB EKNATH CHENDWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Balasaheb Eknath Chendwal was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 86 of 2024 for an offence under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving a six‑month imprisonment and a fine which has been paid. He had been on bail during the trial and filed a criminal …

BANSI S/O. BALA SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ABATED

The petitioner, Bansi Sonawane, filed a criminal revision application (No. 254 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the revision, the petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death of the applicant caused the revision to abate. The Court …

SAINATH RAMESH PUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Sainath Ramesh Punde filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a directive that Respondent No.3 decide on his proposal dated 11 March 2026. The petition raised the issue of whether the court could compel the administrative authority to make a decision within a specified …

KAILASH SUKHDEO SHENDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Kailash Sukhdeo Shende was convicted by a Special Judge under Section 74 of the Bombay Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(v‑a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, receiving a one‑year imprisonment. He filed a criminal application seeking …

VENKATESH NITIN DONGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Venkatesh Nitin Dongare, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release pending trial. The applicant's counsel informed the court of instructions to withdraw the present bail application and to file a fresh application on medical grounds …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra filed applications seeking cancellation of bail granted to several accused in a case of alleged abetment of suicide. The trial court had released the accused without, according to the State, examining the investigation material or the specific allegations in the FIR. The …

ASLAM GULAM NABI QURESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Aslam Gulam Nabi Qureshi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case involving alleged assault with an axe on a witness. The FIR alleged multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, but the injury certificate showed only simple injuries and there …

SUNITA SOPANRAO NEWASEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a series of civil applications filed by various claimants seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the Acquiring Body under a prior order dated 02.05.2024, which directed the deposit of 50% of compensation within twelve weeks. The Acquiring …

RAMKRUSHNA SHAURAO MISAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Ramkrushna Shaurao Misal and others, filed a civil application seeking to correct the names of several petitioners and delete one name from the title clause of the proceeding. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, did not raise any serious opposition to the proposed amendments. …

SUBHADRA UDDHAV NEWASEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a slew of civil applications seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the Acquiring Body under a prior order dated 02.05.2024. That earlier order required the Acquiring Body to deposit fifty percent of the compensation award within twelve …

VANDANA PUNDLIK KARAD AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Vandana Pundlik Karad and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) regarding their representations dated 11 August, 31 August, 3 September and 4 September 2026. They sought a …

SADASHIV BUVAJI CHEDEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench dealt with a series of civil applications seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the Acquiring Body under a prior order dated 02.05.2024. That order required the Acquiring Body to deposit 50% of the compensation award within twelve weeks, but only 13% …

RAJENDRA UDDHAV NEWASEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking withdrawal of compensation amounts that had been partially deposited by the Acquiring Body following a prior court order directing 50% payment within 12 weeks. The Acquiring Body deposited only 13% of the mandated amount, prompting the …

SHAIKH RIZWAN HARIS SHAIKH HAROONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Shaikh Rizwan Haris Shaikh Haroon filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Education Officer (Respondent No.3) regarding a proposal submitted on 27 August 2026. The petition sought a directive for the Education Officer to decide …

SHAIKH MOHAMMAD AWES SHAFIUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHRA AND OTHRS

DISPOSED OFF

Shaikh Mohammad Awes Shafiuddin filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents seeking relief. The Court noted that the matter was not on board and subsequently took it on board. It directed the Education Officer (respondent No.3) to decide the petitioner’s proposal …

SAIF ALI NOOR ALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Saif Ali Noor Ali filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Education Officer regarding a proposal submitted on 27 August 2026. The petitioner sought a directive for the Education Officer to decide the proposal. The Court examined whether …

SANDIP SHRIKANT AHIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sandip Shrikant Ahire, challenged a 24 May 2017 order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe, relying solely on the affinity test and area restriction. He submitted pre‑independence documents (1938, 1919, 1925, 1934) showing his …

SHIVRAJ GOVIND RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The accused Shivraj, Bhimrao and Sahebrao were charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the informant's family with iron rods, wooden sticks and an axe, causing injuries. The prosecution’s charge‑sheet contained injury certificates only for two victims and …

RAJU BANSHI KOHOKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Raju Banshi Kohok, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the matter had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. …

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusAANNA VITTHAL KOLI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a first appeal (No. 386/2025) before the National Lok Adalat of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision in a dispute with Anna Vithal Koli and others. The insurer, through its counsel Adv. Abhijit G. Choudhari, submitted a written …

VISHAL S/O. DNYANESHWAR AAHERversusAASHA W/O. VISHAL AAHER AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

Vishal Aaher filed a criminal revision application (No. 266 of 2019) against Aasha Aaher and others. During the pendency of the revision, the applicant died. The learned counsel informed the court of the death. The court held that the death of the applicant rendered the revision proceedings …

BALU DATTATRAYA KHARADEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) considered a batch of civil applications filed by various claimants seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the Acquiring Body under a prior order directing 50% of compensation to be paid within 12 weeks. The Acquiring Body had deposited only 13% of the …

SAJAY NAMDEO NEWASEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, had earlier ordered the Acquiring Body to deposit 50% of the compensation award within twelve weeks. The Acquiring Body deposited only 13% of the directed amount, prompting the claimants to file multiple civil applications seeking withdrawal of the …

APPASAHEB GULAB THANGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Appasaheb Gulab Thange filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner submitted multiple objections and representations on 15 April, 19 April, 21 April, 24 April, 28 May, 7 June, 3 July and 5 August …

MADHAV GANPAT NEWASEversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KUKADI PRAKALP VIBHAG SHRIGONDA

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a slew of civil applications seeking withdrawal of compensation amounts that had been partially deposited by the Acquiring Body following a prior order directing 50% of the award to be paid within 12 weeks. The Acquiring Body deposited only 13% …

DR. MEENA NARHAR SAKHALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Dr. Meena Narhar Sakhalkar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents regarding a proposal dated 06‑11‑2025. The petition sought a directive that the proposal be considered by the appropriate …

MUNJARAM BAPURAO MUNDHE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking selection grade, alleging that their representations and proposals were pending with the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra, waived service of notice for certain parties. The Court …

SHRIRAM ASHOK GAWAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shriram Ashok Gaware filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner had submitted representations on 27 July 2026 and 31 August 2026, which remained pending. The Court examined whether …

ARJUN MURLIDHAR DANDGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Arjun Murlidhar Dandge filed a writ petition (No. 13074 of 2026) before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted that a similar issue was pending before the Principal Seat of the High Court. The Court noted a …

ZIYAURRAHEMAN AZIZURRAHEMANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ziyaurraheman Azizurrahman, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of Respondent No.3 on representations submitted on 24/02/2025, 26/02/2026 and 29/06/2026. The petition sought a directive for the respondent to consider these representations on their merits. The High Court …

PATEL BHAGYASHRI VIJAYKUMAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a group of government employees working in Tribal and PESA areas, filed multiple writ petitions seeking the grant of the one‑step pay‑scale (Eksthar) benefits as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. They argued that they are similarly situated to the petitioners in Writ …

VISHAL UTTAM JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the dismissal of applications for compassionate appointment on the ground of substitution of a family member's name on a waiting list. All petitioners sought to replace the name of an elder brother, who had been removed from the waiting …

ANJALI BALAJI DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Anjali Balaji Deshmukh, who had been granted bail, filed an application seeking its cancellation. The applicant later instructed counsel to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. After hearing the parties, the court granted permission to withdraw the application. …

LALA SHANKARRAO PAWARversusRAMA SHANKARRAO PAWAR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner obtained interim relief in a writ petition but failed to prosecute the case, leading to its dismissal for want of prosecution. An application (Civil Application No. 5341 of 2026) was filed to restore the writ petition, and the court initially restored it on the condition that the …

ARJUN JALABA MOREAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Arjun Jalaba Morea, was appointed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA). He filed a writ petition seeking direction that he be absorbed into regular government service. The Court examined whether a person appointed solely for a scheme can be …

SHANKAR SITARAM WAGHMAREversusSHAIKH YAKUB SHAIKH AYUB

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Shaikh Yakub and another, filed a contempt petition (No. 253 of 2010) alleging non-compliance with a previous court order. The State of Maharashtra, through its Education Officer, filed an affidavit-in-reply stating that the corrected seniority list had been prepared as directed by …

HANSABAI BHAURAO KHANDAGALEversusJOGINDAR KAUR PRITAMSINGH SHILEDAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

In Contempt Petition No. 535 of 2012, the petitioner, Hansabai B. Khandagale, contended that a contempt order had been passed in Writ Petition No. 283 of 2012, which has now been disposed. The respondents argued that with the disposal of the writ petition, there was nothing left to enforce under the …

RAJU BABURAO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Raju Baburao Shinde, filed a criminal revision application (No. 3674 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the lower court. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, expressed its reluctance to entertain the revision. Consequently, …

NAGORAO SAKHARAM JAGTAP AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

In Contempt Petition No. 121 of 2011, petitioners Nagorao Sakharm Jagtap and others sought compliance with an earlier order directing the respondents to decide their application for rental compensation. The High Court, by order dated 11 September 2026, reiterated that the respondents must decide the …

BABITA UMAKANT NARWADE AND OTHERSversusSANJAY SOPAN MARDE AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The deceased driver Umakant Narwade died after a road accident that occurred while he was employed as a driver for the respondent employer. His widow, children and mother filed a compensation claim under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, which was dismissed by the Compensation Commissioner on …

SMT SUSHILA BHIMRAO GADADEversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Sushila Bhimrao Gadade challenged an order dated 01‑06‑2016 of the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar, which dismissed her appeal in RTS Appeal No. 324 of 2016. She filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against that order. The Court observed that the petitioner …

SACHIN SURYAKANT PATILversusRUPALI W/O SACHIN PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Sachin Suryakant Patil, filed a criminal revision application against Rupali, his wife. Both parties informed the court that they have settled the dispute between them. The court held that a settlement extinguishes the cause of action for the revision. Consequently, the revision …

ULHAS S/O MADHAVRAO NARAGUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, allowed two criminal appeals filed under CrPC s.374(2) by two Irrigation Department officials convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for alleged bribe demands. The Court examined whether the sanction to prosecute was issued by a competent …

SHIVPRASAD MALLINATH SOLAPUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a part‑time teacher at Asta High School, challenged the Education Officer's refusal to sanction his salary and the subsequent termination of his services. He claimed that his appointment was a permanent part‑time post approved by the authorities and that no inquiry or due‑process was …

PRADIP HIRALAL SHAH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1686 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the trial court filed the charge-sheet, the applicants were granted regular bail. On that basis, the applicant's counsel informed the court that they wished to withdraw the …

SUNIL RAOSAHEB SATPUTE AND ANRversusG B DHANORKAR

DISPOSED OFF

Sunil Raosaheb Satpute and another filed Contempt Petition No.87 of 2012 arising from Writ Petition No.2762 of 2011, alleging non‑compliance with an earlier contempt order directing authorities to decide the petitioners' representation promptly. The respondent, G.B. Dhanorkar, filed an …

SUMAYYA WO AJMODDIN NADAFversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sumayya Wo Ajmoddin Nadaf, filed a civil application against the Executive Engineer and two other respondents. She later sought leave to withdraw that application and to file a fresh civil application in which she would appear as the legal representative of a deceased respondent. The …

UTTAMRAO HARIBHAU KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Uttamrao Haribhau Kadam filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the lower court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the …

KALPANA ARUN CHAUDHARI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased government employees, filed writ petitions seeking monetary benefits and pension differentials due to their relatives. The Court examined earlier orders of the same High Court (Writ Petitions No. 5445/2026, 3412/2026, and 15662/2025) which addressed similar …

DEEPAK MADHUKAR DEHADRAYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Deepak Madhukar Dehadray, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1577 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief against the alleged violation of his rights. During the proceedings, the petitioner's …

VITTHAL SANTRAM DAHATONDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vitthal Santram Dahatonde filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner learned that the matter had already been decided by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. …

AJAY RAJKUMAR SHUKLAversusRUPCHAND BHAGCHAND KASLIWAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged an order of the District Judge, Shrirampur, which allowed the plaintiff in a commercial summary suit to amend the plaint by withdrawing a specific prayer concerning a refund of Rs.2,29,95,660. The plaintiff sought the amendment after the defendant raised an objection to …

KRUSHNA JANARDHAN TODKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Krushna Janardhan Todkar and others, filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR No. 0205 of 2025 and related proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Beed. The parties engaged in court‑appointed mediation, resulting in a settlement dated 27.08.2026, wherein the …