DISMISSED
The appellant's 41‑acre land in Domgaon was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a medium project, and an initial compensation of Rs.37,093 per hectare was awarded. Dissatisfied, the appellant sought a reference under Section 18, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Trimbak Pandharinath Thombre, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel submitted that the passage of time had rendered the matter infructuous. The court considered whether any relief could still be granted. Finding that the petition was no longer …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Faizunnisa Begum Abdul Khadar, filed Writ Petition No. 13110 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction on the representation dated 30 March 2026. The petition raised the question of whether Respondent No.5 should be compelled to decide the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant sought condonation of a 3005‑day delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record and also requested that an abatement be set aside. The respondents opposed the application. The court examined the liberal interpretation of …
DISPOSED OFF
Shivam Eknath Jamadar obtained a Scheduled Tribe (ST) certificate on 10 January 2026 and applied to the Scrutiny Committee for verification of his ST claim on 2 April 2026, seeking admission to an MBBS course under the reserved category. His category was later changed to open without his knowledge, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Vidya Sanjay Chaudhari, filed an application to withdraw the compensation amount that had been deposited by United India Insurance Company following a Tribunal award. The Court examined the Tribunal's endorsement of the applicant's entitlement and considered the competing interests of …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The appellant, Durgabai Eknath Bajpai, filed a civil application (No. 14017 of 2023) seeking permission to bring the legal representatives of a deceased appellant on record in a second appeal. The application was heard before Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh. The court examined the application and found …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 12710‑12720/2026) filed by various petitioners whose vehicles and machinery had been seized by revenue officials and a penalty of Rs.7,50,000 (or Rs.2,00,000 in one case) imposed under Section 48(8) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 12710‑12720/2026) filed by various petitioners whose vehicles and machinery had been seized by revenue officials and a penalty of Rs.7,50,000 (or Rs.2,00,000 in one case) imposed under Section 48(8) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Mangal w/o Laxman Bahirwal and others, and Sangita w/o Appa Ranmare and others, filed civil applications against respondents Subhash and Navnath respectively. Respondent No.1 was duly served but failed to appear before the court. The court, after noting the service and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Mangal w/o Laxman Bahirwal and others, and Sangita w/o Appa Ranmare and others, filed civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Subhash s/o Shivaji Gujar and Navnath s/o Rangnath Hatavate respectively. Service of notice was effected on …
DISPOSED OFF
In a first appeal filed by Amar Mahadev Choudhary against Komal Amar Choudhary, the appellant, through counsel Mr. M. K. Jadhav and Mr. More Abhijit S., sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The matter was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Rohit W. Joshi. No substantive issues on the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed First Appeal (ST) No. 32443 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, along with Civil Applications No. 10018/2013 and 10019/2013. Civil Application No. 10018/2013 sought condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal. The matter was referred …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Pathan Akhib Pathan Rashid, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 36‑day delay in restoring the original proceeding (Criminal Application No. 8 of 2024) and requested an extension of time to file the charge‑sheet. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and found …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Nana Kama Patil, challenged the Sub‑Divisional Officer’s (SDO) order dated 04‑07‑2025 which upheld a customary right of way through his land and directed him not to obstruct it. The petitioner argued that the SDO had been inconsistent in earlier orders, that the affidavit of Manohar …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Nimna Dudhna Project, filed a civil application seeking an extension of time to deposit a compensation amount ordered by the court, and permission for the office to accept the payment. The court examined the applicant’s averments and found that the applicant had made out a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vaibhav Prabhakr Kulkarni, sought allotment of a plot that had been purchased by his father in an auction conducted by a bank. The plot is designated for industrial use, but the petitioner submitted a proposal for a restaurant, a commercial activity, which the Maharashtra Industrial …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking to recall an order dated 30.07.2026 in Civil Application No.8089 of 2026 and to correct a typographical error in prayer clause “B”, where the names of applicants were mistakenly listed as Nos.1A to 1G instead of Nos.1A to 1E. The petitioner’s counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, a clerk and a branch officer of the Irrigation Department, were convicted under Sections 7, 12 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe in a trap operation conducted by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau. They challenged the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Gajanan Haribhau Kawale, filed an application seeking condonation of a six‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. The application was supported by Advocate Yash B. Mote, while the State was represented by Advocate G. O. Wattamwar. The sole issue …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, owners of land acquired for the widening of National Highway No.361, challenged the arbitral awards that granted them compensation of Rs.399 per square metre, arguing that the arbitrator improperly differentiated compensation for similarly situated lands. The arbitrator had awarded …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief that arose out of Civil Suit No. 48 of 2021. While the writ petition was pending, the principal civil suit was finally disposed. The Court observed that the relief claimed in the writ petition was wholly dependent on the existence of the pending …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions filed by former government employees sought recalculation of their pension benefits, claiming entitlement to monetary differences based on actual service and last drawn salary. The petitioners argued that they should receive pension amounts including the annual …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Shivaji Vishwanath Kalbile and Bali @ Kiran Shivaji Kalbile, were convicted by the District Judge‑4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, for theft under Section 363 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment. They had earlier been acquitted of rape and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, retired civil servants, sought direction that they be granted the notional annual increment due on 1 July and that their pensionary benefits be recalculated to include this increment, invoking Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The Court noted that …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions were filed by former employees of the State of Maharashtra seeking correction of their pensionary benefits. The petitioners alleged that their pensions were calculated without including the annual increment in their last drawn salary and that they were denied …
DISPOSED OFF
The husband appealed against a magistrate's order granting his wife Rs.10,000 per month as maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, despite no finding of domestic violence. The appellate court affirmed the order, and the husband filed a criminal revision under …
DISMISSED
The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against a judgment of the Commissioner for Employees’ Compensation, which had awarded Rs. 1,40,000 to the employee, Tirupati Pochayya Raghela, under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923. The insurer contended that the employee had not produced sufficient …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, members of the Kohinoor Education Society, were unable to appear before the Assistant Charity Commissioner in Inquiry No.382 of 2019 because they were remanded to judicial custody, which also prevented them from signing their affidavits and applications. The Commissioner rejected …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, Namdeo B. Survase, challenged a 2017 award concerning land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana project in Jalna district, seeking higher compensation based on the parity principle. The land, classified as dry and semi‑irrigated, had been originally awarded at Rs.554 per are for dry land …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of retired civil servants filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the notional annual increment in their retirement benefits, arguing that they had served at least six months in the year preceding their superannuation. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services …
DISMISSED
The National Insurance Company appealed under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the Commissioner’s award of Rs.7,94,940 compensation for the death of Ganesh, a 22‑year‑old employee earning Rs.7,000 per month. The respondents proved the deceased’s age through a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought direction that they be granted the notional annual increment under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, and that their pension benefits be recalculated to include such increment. The Court examined whether an …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who were co‑owners of certain lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, alleged that they received no compensation for Survey Nos. 240 and 241 and that the compensation for Survey Nos. 4 and 169 was improperly allotted to the respondents. They applied to the Deputy …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Central Railway’s acquisition of land in Hanumantwadi village for a broad‑gauge line led to compensation awards under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The award dated 07‑02‑2008 set compensation at Rs.1,170‑1,420 per square foot, which claimants contested, seeking Rs.50 per sq. ft., later …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought directions for the Zilla Parishad to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July after their retirement, arguing that they had rendered at least six months of service in the preceding year. They relied on Rule 10 of the …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of former government employees filed multiple writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation. They contended that the pension should include the annual increment of their last drawn salary and that they were entitled to any arrears arising …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of former employees of the State of Maharashtra filed writ petitions alleging that their pension benefits were miscalculated. They contended that the pension should be computed on the basis of their last drawn salary including the annual increment and that they were eligible for …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, an assistant teacher appointed in 2013, claimed his appointment was lawful and that his oral termination on 10 March 2023 was illegal. The school, after becoming a grant‑in‑aid institution, disputed the validity of his appointment and denied any termination. The petitioner appealed …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, originally a defendant in a civil suit, challenged an order dated 5 August 2019 that appointed a court commissioner before any oral evidence was taken. The High Court noted its consistent jurisprudence that a court commissioner should normally be appointed only after the recording of …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra acquired 30 R of land in Takle Pokhari village for a percolation tank, issuing a Section 4 notification in 2005. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 710 per R for dry land, but the reference court enhanced the compensation to Rs 3,000 per R, treating …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Ravindra Siddharth Kale, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the applicant was arrested. The applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court which had re‑classified land acquired for Percolation Tank No. 4 as irrigated and enhanced compensation from Rs 710 per R to Rs 4,000 per R, also awarding interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act. The State …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, an assistant teacher appointed in 2013, was allegedly terminated orally on 10 March 2023 after the school began receiving grant‑in‑aid, leading him to file an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 before …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants filed an application seeking restoration of an appeal that had been dismissed for non‑compliance and default by this Court on 28 August 2026. The applicants argued that they had filed a pursis indicating that the legal representatives of respondent No.1 were already on record, and …
DISPOSED OFF
Atul Manik Kore was appointed as a Sevak in a private school in 2011 and later became a permanent employee. After the school began receiving grant‑in‑aid, a dispute arose and the petitioner was orally terminated on 10 March 2023 for protesting. He appealed the termination under Section 9 of the …
DISMISSED
The applicant, Shashikant Kokate, filed a second anticipatory bail application after his first was rejected on 18 July 2026. He argued that the filing of a charge‑sheet and an injury certificate indicated a change in circumstances that warranted bail. The respondent contended that no further …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, represented by Advocate Y. G. Somani, sought the Court's permission to withdraw their writ petition and to file an amendment application in the trial court. The Court, after noting the petitioners' desire to withdraw, granted leave for the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition. …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The wife (applicant) filed an application under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking transfer of Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 5 of 2025, pending before the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna, to the Family Court at Sambhajinagar, Aurangabad. She alleged ill‑treatment by …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners sought condonation of a 1,226‑day delay in filing an application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record by setting aside an abatement. The High Court examined the application and heard counsel for both sides. Considering that the substantive dispute …
DISMISSED
The husband filed a criminal revision under Section 397 of the CrPC challenging a Family Court order dated 29 March 2019 that directed him to pay Rs.2,000 per month to his wife and Rs.1,000 each to his two minor children as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. He contended that he was not heard, that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Arun Vishnupand Bhagyanwant, instructed the court to withdraw his contempt proceedings against certain respondents in multiple contempt petitions (CP No. 251, 580, and 59 of 2022). The court accepted the petitioner's statements and ordered the dismissal of the petitions against the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Three individuals—Ashok Pamajee Borawake, Nitin Laxmikantrao Apasingikar and Rajendrakumar Nanarao Patil—were convicted by a Special Judge in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a bribe in connection with a sale‑deed transaction. They filed …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. Counsel for the petitioner later submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petition could no longer be …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Dhondiba Baburao Shep, sought condonation of a 282‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award that enhanced their compensation. The Court examined whether the delay could be justified under the principles of equity and procedural law. Considering the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged the State Government's decision to discontinue the scheme of advance increments for employees under the 6th Central Pay Commission. The Court examined earlier Government Resolutions (27‑02‑2009, 24‑08‑2017) and Circulars (03‑07‑2009, 04‑09‑2018) to determine whether a …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Three accused—Ashok Pamajee Borawake, Nitin Laxmikantrao Apasingikar and Rajendrakumar Nanarao Patil—were convicted by a Special Judge in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding a bribe in connection with a sale‑deed transaction. While on bail …
DISPOSED OFF
Chaya Bhimrao Sable filed a contempt petition (No. 180 of 2020) seeking enforcement of a direction that respondent No.2 pay arrears of salary. The petitioner alleged that the order under contempt had not been complied with. The Court examined the record and noted the petitioner’s absence, inferring …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court heard contempt petitions and related civil applications concerning the payment of amounts ordered under a contempt decree. Respondent No.4 calculated the amounts due to petitioners Atul V. Warangule (Rs 63,08,103) and Nitin B. Gaikwad (Rs 61,67,729). Respondent No.1 had already …
DISMISSED
The applicant, Nitin, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that was returned unpaid. He claimed the cheque was given as security for a small hand loan of Rs 30,000 to a friend, not for the larger Rs 1.6 lakh loan alleged by the complainant. The trial …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Nitin, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that was returned due to insufficient funds. The complainant alleged a hand loan of Rs.1,60,000 and presented the dishonoured cheque as evidence of a legally enforceable debt. The applicant …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Three individuals—Ashok Pamajee Borawake, Nitin Laxmikantrao Apasingikar and Rajendrakumar Nanarao Patil—were convicted by a Special Judge in Latur under Sections 7, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding bribes in connection with a sale‑deed transaction. They filed …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Ravindra Parshuram Khirid, filed a criminal application seeking an extension of time to deposit the amount ordered by the court on 17 August 2026. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Amol R. Joshi, requested a one‑week extension. The respondent, Sonali Ravindra, was represented by Mr. D.R. …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court heard contempt petitions and related civil applications concerning the payment of amounts ordered under a contempt decree. Respondent no.4 calculated the total sums due to petitioners Atul V. Warangule (Rs 63,08,103) and Nitin B. Gaikwad (Rs 61,67,729). Respondent no.1 had already …
DISPOSED OFF
In a contempt petition (No. 814 of 2025) filed by Shobha Atmaram Patil against the State of Maharashtra and others, the High Court considered a related civil application (No. 10923 of 2026) seeking amendment. The court allowed the amendment as per prayer clause "A" and directed that the amendment be …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed several writ petitions seeking the benefits of the ACPs scheme, alleging that the authorities had not granted them the entitlements. The State, through the Additional Government Pleader, opposed the petitions on the ground that the petitioners had not first made any …
DISPOSED OFF
Vinod Anna Jadhav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Beed, to decide on a proposal he submitted on 06‑02‑2015. The petitioner alleged that the inaction violated his right to a timely …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Jitendra Balasaheb Jadhav, filed a writ petition challenging a 20 September 2021 order that rejected his application for the transfer of respondent No. 3. The petition was never circulated after filing, and the court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in prosecuting …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, educated unemployed persons, challenged a Government Resolution dated 05.05.2022 that regularised and absorbed two municipal employees (Respondents 5 and 6) into the Parbhani Municipal Corporation. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the resolution, alleging illegal …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners Anil Kishor Ade (Rathod) and others filed a criminal application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. Both parties were referred to mediation, which was reported to be successful. The informant, who was present, filed an affidavit stating no objection to the …
DISMISSED
The petitioners, Sandeep Popatrao Kothavade and another, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The court directed them on 20 June 2022 to submit written notes of arguments, which they failed to do. The petitioners also did not appear before the court thereafter. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking a court direction for the police to take action against respondents 4 to 6 based on a complaint dated 11 September 2019. The State's Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted a communication dated 7 December 2019 indicating that the complaint had …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a large group of writ petitions (numbers 904‑931) that raised the issue of whether Medical Officers are entitled to engage in private practice and receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the matter had already been decided in a …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a large group of writ petitions (numbers 904‑931) that raised the issue of whether Medical Officers are entitled to engage in private practice and receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the matter had already been decided in a …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Gopal Sitaram Tiwari, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. He later sought leave to withdraw that application, requesting liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The sole issue before the court was whether …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking recovery of a sum from the respondents. The Government, acting as a respondent, filed an affidavit stating that the amount in question had already been recovered from respondent No. 4. The court examined the affidavit and found that the relief sought by …
DISPOSED OFF
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, allowed writ petitions filed by subject teachers challenging Clause 3 of the Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016. Relying on the Nagpur Bench’s decision in Ganesh Mahadeo Asekar v. State of Maharashtra (W.P. No. 5563 of 2022), the Court held that the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The claimants' houses in village Rui, Latur district were acquired for the Udharva Manyar Project under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer initially paid Rs 35 per square metre, but the Land Reference Court increased it to Rs 110 per square metre. The claimants …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court heard multiple appeals challenging the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Wadala Tank project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed compensation at Rs 150‑225 per R, which the reference court enhanced to Rs 940 per R. The acquiring body argued that the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged awards of compensation granted by the State of Maharashtra for land acquired for the Sina‑Kolegaon Medium Project, alleging that the reference courts failed to treat a 1994 sale (Exhibit 19) as a comparable sale and that the land in one appeal was irrigated, warranting …
RULE DISCHARGED
The petition stems from a marriage in 2000 that broke down in 2006, leading the wife to file a criminal complaint under Sections 498A and 494 IPC and later a maintenance suit under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The trial court ordered the husband to pay Rs.5,000 per month as …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The wife, Babita @laxmi, filed a civil application seeking condonation of an 80‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal against her husband, Sunil Dasharath Bhoi. The bailiff’s report indicated that the husband refused to accept the notice, which the court deemed to constitute service. No …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of an amount that had been deposited in the court following an interim order directing the Acquiring Body to deposit 75% of the award. The court permitted the claimants to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount upon furnishing a standard …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of an amount deposited pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The High Court, having earlier directed the depositing body to place 75% of the amount in the court, allowed the claimants to withdraw 50% of that sum upon furnishing a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Branch Manager of National Insurance Co Ltd filed a civil application seeking a stay of the impugned judgment and award in a dispute with the deceased Bhausaheb Asaram Jadhav's estate. The court noted that the entire amount awarded had been deposited with the court as per an earlier order dated …
DISMISSED
The appellants, represented by Advocate B. R. Kedar, filed a written request to withdraw their second appeal (SA/705/2015). The High Court recorded the instructions and, pursuant to the withdrawal, dismissed the appeal. Consequently, any interim relief that had been granted was vacated. The Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Kondiba Mohan Shelar, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the full compensation amount, including accrued interest, that had been deposited by the Acquiring Body after a stay was granted on the impugned judgment. The applicant relied on a prior order in Civil Application …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Rajendra Subhash Kanwade and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking monetary benefits arising from an extension of their pay scale and entitlement to dearness allowance. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, contested the extent and timing of such …
DISPOSED OFF
Akbar Khan Karim Khan filed Writ Petition No. 11590 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. During the proceedings, the …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, daughter of the deceased, sought a temporary injunction to prevent the respondents from creating any third‑party interest in several plots that form the subject of a partition suit. The suit for partition was dismissed, but the trial court had earlier granted an injunction (Exhibit‑5) …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various government employees seeking proper calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation. The petitioners argued that they were entitled to pension amounts that included the annual increment on their last …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various retired government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners contended that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the annual increment and that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ajay Govindrao Surywanshi, filed a civil application (No.336 of 2024) and a writ petition (No.12304/2022) seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The civil application was allowed in accordance with prayer clauses B and C, though the judgment does not detail the specific …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court considered two applications for condonation of delay: one for a 175‑day delay in filing an appeal and another for a 3,332‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record and setting aside an abatement. The court found that the first delay was not …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra. A motion was filed to correct typographical errors in the order dated 22 September 2026, specifically the omission of the words “excluding the Portion” after “houses” and the substitution of “remaining” with “from”. Both …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a criminal revision seeking discharge after the charge was framed on 27 June 2022. The respondent argued that the filing of the charge rendered the revision application infructuous. The court examined whether the revision could proceed given the subsequent framing of charges. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vasant Narso... Kamble, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge Junior Division, Tuljapur dated 08.08.2025, which rejected his application (Exhibit‑14) under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a stay of the suit on the ground that the issue was …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The wife, Yogita @ Seema Krushna Bhadke, filed a Hindu marriage petition for divorce in Pune. After experiencing cruelty, she moved back to her parents’ home in Ambajogai, Beed, a distance of about 275 km, and sought transfer of the petition to the nearer court under CPC s.24. The husband opposed …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) considered several appeals and civil applications arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1993 for the establishment of a Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) project at Latur. The appellants challenged earlier judgments and …
DISMISSED
The appellants challenged three compensation awards dated 27‑02‑2004, 19‑01‑2004 and 17‑06‑2006 that arose from land acquisition proceedings of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) in Latur dating back to 1993. The issues centered on whether the earlier awards were proper and …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The husband filed a revision seeking to set aside a maintenance order of Rs.4,000 per month granted under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, arguing it was excessive and ignored his limited earning capacity as a labourer. The wife and children opposed the revision, noting that …
DISPOSED OFF
Krushna Devidas Haleghongde filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashment of an order dated 02.02.2026 that placed him under Category 2(c) of the 2010 Guideline and requested placement under Category 3(b). He relied on a prior judgment of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 364 of 2026, …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary including the annual …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of petitioners filed multiple writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra related to a tender process. The petitioners later sought the Court's permission to withdraw their petitions so that they could pursue the remedy provided under Clause 55 of …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Prakash Nivrutti Yachwad filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Latur and other respondents. The petition sought relief without specifying the exact nature of the grievance. The Court examined whether …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of ten writ petitions filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra sought relief concerning a tender process. The petitioners requested permission to withdraw their petitions so they could pursue the remedy available under Clause 55 of the tender document. The Court granted …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging the finalization of tenders and later sought the Court's permission to withdraw those petitions in order to pursue the remedy provided under Clause 55 of the tender document. The Court considered whether such withdrawal was permissible and …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of ten petitioners filed separate writ petitions challenging the finalization of tenders issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought relief, arguing that their objections under Clause 55 of the tender document had not been considered. The petitioners later requested permission …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Collector of Jalgaon to decide a reference application filed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highway Act and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966. The respondents waived service of notice, and the Collector’s counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging the finalization of tenders issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought the Court's permission to withdraw these writ petitions so that they could pursue the remedy provided under Clause 55 of the tender document. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary including the annual increment, and that they were …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of petitioners filed multiple writ petitions challenging the finalization of tenders issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writs so they could pursue the remedy provided under Clause 55 of the tender document. The High Court allowed the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petition (Contempt Petition No. 983 of 2025) was filed by Ravindra Dhondu Gawali against Minal Karanwal. The petitioner sought relief from an order of contempt that had been previously issued. The respondent/State was represented by Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar and the other respondents by Mr. V.V. Gujar. …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of nine writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and others sought relief concerning a tender process. The petitioners requested permission to withdraw the petitions so they could pursue the remedy available under Clause 55 of the tender document. The High …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of ten writ petitions filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and others sought relief concerning objections to a tender process. The petitioners requested permission to withdraw the petitions to pursue the remedy available under Clause 55 of the tender document. The …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of former government employees filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits, alleging that the pension department failed to incorporate the annual increment of their last drawn salary and to pay arrears due on their superannuation. The petitioners …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of former government employees filed multiple writ petitions in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the calculation of their pension benefits after superannuation. They alleged that the pension department had not incorporated the annual increment of their last drawn …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a batch of writ petitions filed by retired government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary including the annual increment, and that they …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions were filed by former government employees seeking monetary benefits and recalculated pensionary benefits after superannuation. The petitioners argued that they were entitled to the difference in pension amounts, inclusion of the annual increment from their last drawn …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of ten petitioners filed separate writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging the finalization of tenders issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought the Court's permission to withdraw their writ petitions so that they could pursue the remedy provided under Clause 55 …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that refused to allow the exhibition of a lease deed and an agreement to sale, both over 30 years old, in a suit for specific performance and perpetual injunction. The trial court rejected the petitioners' application on the …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of writ petitions filed by former government employees sought enhanced pension benefits from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the annual increment, and that they were entitled to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, originally a defendant in a suit seeking declaration that a will and gift deed were fraudulent, challenged the trial court's order appointing a Court Receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code to manage and preserve donations received between 12‑09‑2026 and …
DISPOSED OFF
Mukesh Kailash Kochure filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Education Officer regarding a proposal submitted on 09 September 2026. The petition sought judicial intervention to compel a decision on the proposal. The Court, after noting …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Pratik Dnyaneshwar Kharale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after taking the petition on board, directed the Education Officer (respondent No.3) to decide the petitioner’s proposal dated 9 …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of teachers filed writ petitions challenging Clause 3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016, which denied them the subject‑teacher pay scale. The petitioners argued that the clause was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The High Court, relying on its …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Omkar Rajendra Ingale, filed a contempt petition (No.602 of 2026) arising out of Writ Petition No.9278 of 2026. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order passed against the respondent, Shri Abhishek Singh, had already been complied with. The Court was required to consider …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to a court order dated 25.11.2025. The applicant claimed parity with other claimants in Civil Application No. 7805 of 2026, who were allowed to withdraw 75% of the deposited sum. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust, through its Executive Engineer, filed a civil application seeking the High Court's permission to implement Resolution No.192 dated 02‑06‑2026, which authorises the issuance of an e‑tender for the annual maintenance contract of 23 diesel generator sets and 5 …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Company Ltd., having accepted the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar (Petition No. 56 of 2005), filed a first appeal before the Special Lok Adalat, High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The appeal was delayed, but the court condoned the delay and …
DISPOSED OFF
The New India Assurance Company filed a first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in a 2005 motor accident claim. The company subsequently accepted the Tribunal’s award and submitted a withdrawal pursis dated 25 March 2026, seeking to withdraw the appeal. The …
Withdrawn
The petitioners, Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar and another, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1585 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the In Charge of Vimantal Police Station, Nanded. The petitioner’s counsel later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Jahir Ismail Shaikh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for offences under Sections 397 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence on the grounds that he was falsely implicated, the prosecution failed to prove his …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a member of a primary agricultural credit society (respondent No.5), objected to the inclusion of respondent No.6 as the society’s delegate for voting in the election of a district central co‑operative bank (respondent No.4). The objection was based on two grounds: (i) a pending …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Ravindra Raghunath Chavan and another, were arrested in connection with a suicide case involving a land dispute and alleged harassment, with the deceased's suicide note naming them. The FIR alleged that the applicants threatened the deceased and were involved in a prior physical …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of 43 petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the denial of the old pension scheme, contending that their recruitment to Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar occurred before 1 November 2005, which would make them eligible for the pre‑2005 pension benefits. The respondents, representing the State …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered Writ Petitions 12893 and 12878 of 2026 challenging Clause 3 of the Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016, which denied subject‑teacher pay scale benefits to certain teachers. Relying on the Nagpur Bench decision in Ganesh Mahadeo Asekar v. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Nirman) of Central Railway filed a delay application seeking condonation of a 2,030‑day lapse in filing an appeal against an award of the Reference Court. The applicant argued that the delay was due to administrative reasons and that the entire awarded amount had been …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Nirman) of Central Railway filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,030‑day delay in filing an appeal against an award of a reference court. The applicant argued that the delay was due to administrative reasons and that the entire awarded amount had been deposited …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, original defendants in a 2017 suit for declaration, possession and perpetual injunction, were unable to attend a scheduled cross‑examination of the plaintiff on 9 October 2019 because their counsel was engaged elsewhere. Consequently, the trial court issued a ‘no cross’ order on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a licensed medical general store, was inspected and served a show‑cause notice for alleged violations, after which his licence was suspended effective 21 September 2026. He filed an appeal under Section 66(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, but the suspension took effect before …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Laxman Mittu Pawar filed applications seeking condonation of a 3,202‑day delay in preferring first appeals against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents did not contest the applications, and the applicant offered to forgo interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. The Court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
A large group of former government employees filed writ petitions challenging the calculation of their pension benefits, alleging that the State of Maharashtra had not incorporated the annual increment of their last drawn salary and had denied arrears. The petitioners contended they were eligible …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Balu Rambhau Gund, filed an application seeking to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.5, Bhanudas Narayan Bhagwat, and to amend the title clause of the writ petition accordingly. The court considered whether such an amendment could be permitted …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Mahesh Dhananjay Naikwad and another, filed a writ petition challenging the failure of the Scrutiny Committee to decide their claim of belonging to the Scheduled Tribe category, a matter pending since 17 November 2025. The petitioners argued that the hearing had concluded and the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, brother of the deceased, claimed an accidental death insurance benefit of Rs.20,00,000 for his sister who died on 21 May 2016 following an alleged accident on 20 May 2016. The claim was filed with the insurer on 29 October 2018 and rejected on 5 May 2019. The petitioner approached …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a stenographer appointed in the Agricultural Department of Maharashtra to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates, was required to produce a validity certificate of Scheduled Tribe status. She filed a claim with the Scrutiny Committee on 17 February 2026, which remained …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prabhakar Balaji Deshatwad, was appointed to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates and was directed by the State of Maharashtra to submit a caste validity certificate within six weeks. He contended that his claim for Scheduled Tribe status was pending before the relevant …
DISPOSED OFF
The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Limited relating to motor accident claim petitions. The appellant filed withdrawal letters and authority letters for each matter, which the court accepted and marked …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Atish Balaji Tekle, was appointed to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribes and was directed by the State to submit a caste validity certificate within six weeks. He filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 08‑09‑2026 that threatened termination for non‑submission of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Gangabharati Mahila Bachat Gat, filed a writ petition challenging the order of allotment of a fair price shop by the State of Maharashtra. The respondents argued that an alternative remedy existed in the form of an appeal before the Commissioner. The Court examined whether the writ …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants appealed the awards of the Land Reference Court concerning the acquisition of their lands for two percolation tanks in Latur district. They argued that the court had incorrectly applied an aggregate method for compensation despite the existence of sale exemplars, and that the lands …
DISPOSED OFF
Two writ petitions were filed against the Nanded Zilla Dehkrekh Sahakari Sanstha Marya, Nanded challenging Labour Court orders that directed the respondent to pay Rs.1,79,072 to the petitioners. In petition 5126/2020, the petitioner argued that the respondent had admitted a higher liability of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased government employees, filed writ petitions seeking monetary benefits and pension differentials due to their relatives. The Court examined earlier orders of the same High Court (Writ Petitions No. 5445/2026, 3412/2026, and 15662/2025) which addressed similar …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Dnyandeo Ramabhau Mokate and others, filed writ petitions (Nos. 8368 and 8369 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Vijay Chandrabhanu Mokate. The petitioners sought relief, but during the proceedings the parties reached an amicable settlement. The learned …
DISPOSED OFF
Madhukar Sudhakar Puri filed a civil writ petition (No. 1511 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the Union of India and others. The petition had been delayed, and the respondents raised objections. The Court, after hearing, decided to condone the delay and restored the writ …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by retired government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the annual increment, and that they …
DISPOSED OFF
The Branch Manager of IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna's order rejecting its application for a witness summons to Dr. Kishor Dange Patil of Hirai Hospital and Critical Care Hospital Center. The insurer alleged that the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Baban Dhondiba Shinde filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking to withdraw the enhanced compensation that the respondent, the Division Manager of M.S.R.T.C. Ltd., had deposited following a prior judgment dated 26 June 2024. The applicant argued that, having …
Withdrawn
Gopinath R. Ambhure filed an anticipatory bail application. The informant and the State pointed out that the applicant had not disclosed his criminal antecedents. The applicant contended that the non‑disclosure was not deliberate and requested to withdraw the application, seeking permission to file …
DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION/DEFAULT AT FINAL HEARING STAGE
Ashok and Arun, brothers, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in Aurangabad for offences under Sections 307 r/w 34 and 107/109 of the IPC. They filed an application seeking suspension of their sentence and bail, arguing that the prosecution's case lacked corroboration, was based on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Dattatraya Natha Nimse, challenged an order (Exhibit 94) in Civil Suit No. 255 of 2023 that allowed the plaintiff to produce a list of documents (Exhibit 95) including public documents and relinquishment deeds, some of which were marked for reference only. The petitioner argued that …
DISMISSED
The High Court examined two contempt petitions filed by Padmashree Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. alleging that the respondent sugar factory violated an interim arbitration order dated 2 September 2024, which restrained creation of third‑party interests over certain …
DISPOSED OFF
A writ petition (916 WRIT PETITION NO. 8367 OF 2017) was filed by Aiyodhyabai Jaijairam Kasab and another against Dashrath Govinda Parihar and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Doke Kishor R and Doke S K, while the respondents (nos. 2 to 12) were represented by Ms. Ashwini P Shinde. …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for about 7,880 candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The court held that the State and the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a group of students, filed multiple writ petitions challenging the university's refusal to grant them an extension for submitting their theses. The High Court noted that the matter was already covered by its earlier order in Writ Petition No.6661 of 2026. Relying on that precedent, …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants' lands were acquired in 2005 for village rehabilitation and a compensation of Rs 1,87,000 per hectare was awarded, later enhanced to Rs 2,70,000 per hectare by the reference court. Dissatisfied, the claimants appealed, relying on an earlier award (LAR No. 150/2013) for the same Gat …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (904-923 of 2026) filed by various petitioners challenging orders of the Collector and the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners had earlier made representations to the Collector on several dates in July 2026 and were …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of writ petitions (Nos. 13169‑13199, 13204‑13239 of 2026) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials, seeking relief from orders of the Collector. The petitioners had earlier made representations to the Collector on several dates in July 2026. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an earlier order. The respondent filed an affidavit-in-reply stating that it had complied by deciding the representation under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act and by making the required payment to the petitioner. The court …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated batch of first appeals filed by numerous claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in land acquisition proceedings. The claimants argued that, like earlier matters, their appeals should be sent back to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication, …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of petitioners filed multiple writ petitions (904, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 922, 923) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The High Court observed that the petitioners must first deposit the amount specified in the notice within two …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from an alleged assault on 29‑07‑2025. The prosecution alleged that the applicants, using an iron rod and axe, inflicted multiple injuries on the victim, and presented an injury certificate …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of writ petitions (Nos. 904‑923) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra challenging orders of the Municipal Council and the Collector. The petitioners sought relief without complying with a notice requiring them to deposit a specified amount. The High Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The dispute between New India Assurance Company Ltd. (appellant) and Kanhopatra @ Pooja Pandurang Gadamwad and others (respondents) was referred to the Lok Adalat for determination. The appellant, represented by Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, submitted withdrawal purses and an authority letter, indicating its …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 2833-2842 of 2017) filed by various petitioners against the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board, Ahmednagar. The petitioners were represented by Advocate Vinayak Sudhakar Bedre, while the respondent was …
DISMISSED
The applicant, Shilpa Mohan Shukla, filed a praecipe seeking correction of typographical errors in an order dated 28.01.2026. The errors involved the incorrect naming of the court as “Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune” instead of the correct “Civil Judge Senior Division, Indapur, District Pune” in …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of writ petitions (Nos. 904, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 922 and 923) were filed by various individuals against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners sought relief concerning representations made to the Collector, but the Court noted that a notice …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Shaikh Rauphodin Gayasodin filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel C.V. Thombre, sought permission to withdraw the petitions and to be allowed to file a review before Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh as per the bye‑laws. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by former government employees seeking enhanced pension benefits. The petitioners argued that their pensions should be calculated on the basis of the last drawn salary inclusive of the annual increment, and that they …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 2833-2841 of 2017) against the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board, Ahmednagar, challenging certain actions of the Board. The respondent filed a motion seeking that the order dated 02.02.2026 be "spoken to minutes" and that separate corrected …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Savera Majur Sahkari Sanstha Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was to be heard on 10 July 2026, but the petitioner's counsel was absent. The court recorded the absence and, after no representation was made, posted the matter for …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 2833‑2841 of 2017) filed by various petitioners against the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board, Ahmednagar. The petitioners sought relief, while the respondent’s counsel requested that a separate order be issued for …
DISPOSED OFF
The landlord filed a suit for eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement and obtained a decree for possession of shop No. NMC 3-6-525 (CTS 1888). The decree was affirmed by the High Court, but the District Judge remanded the execution proceedings without giving reasons, allowing the …
DISPOSED OFF
A series of writ petitions filed by former government employees of Maharashtra sought recalculation of their pension benefits, claiming that the annual increment in their last drawn salary before superannuation had not been accounted for. The petitioners argued that they were entitled to the …
DISPOSED OFF
Shaikh Abdul Rizwan Mannan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. After oral arguments, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged the State Government's decision to discontinue the scheme of advance increments for employees under the 6th Central Pay Commission. The Court examined earlier Government Resolutions (27‑02‑2009, 24‑08‑2017) and Circulars (03‑07‑2009, 04‑09‑2018) and held that the 2009 …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Aditya Shivraj Motegaonkar filed Writ Petition No. 10275 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking to amend the petition. The respondents, including the Union of India and other parties, opposed the amendment. The Court examined whether the amendment could be …
DISPOSED OFF
Dr. Pawan Shivajirao Mahajan filed Writ Petition No. 13121 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was heard on its merits, and the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. On the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The appellant, Karan Namdeo Bankar, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. The prosecution’s case relied on three eye‑witnesses whose statements were recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC rather than Section 161, and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against a judgment dated 20 June 2015 that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Nagar Bypass Road, arguing that the land should have been treated as agricultural because it was shown in the Green Zone of the Urban Development Plan. The State sought …
DISMISSED
The applicant filed a criminal revision application but failed to appear before the High Court. The court had previously warned that non-appearance would be taken as a loss of interest in prosecuting the matter. On the scheduled date, the applicant again did not appear. The court therefore concluded …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Dinkar Madhukarrao Kerkar, filed a criminal application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant requested that the application be withdrawn. The bench, after considering the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer (the acquiring body) filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that allowed the original claimants to amend their compensation claim to include additional trees and related assets. The claimants sought to increase the number of trees and associated compensation …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired in 2005 for the Upper Tapi Project, arguing that a later award in the same village (LAR No.150/2013) granted a higher rate of Rs 100 per square metre. The original award was Rs 1,87,000 per hectare, later enhanced to Rs 2,70,000 …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Bhaskar Eknath Badak, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb him as a permanent Gram Rojgar Sevak. The Court examined whether temporary workers under the Gram Rojgar scheme acquire a right to permanent appointment. Relying on its earlier …