Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 9001–9200
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through its authorized signatories, filed first appeals against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards in Osmanabad, Ahmednagar and Beed. The insurance company subsequently submitted withdrawal pursis and an authority letter dated 25‑03‑2026, indicating its …
The petitioner, Siddheshwar alias Siddhu Murlidhar Kekan, sought the return of a revolver seized in connection with Crime No.25/2022, alleging that his firearms licence, though expired in 2021, was pending renewal before the Collector, Jalna. The trial court, exercising powers under Section 452 of …
The petitioner sought to implead the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation in a suit for declaration of ownership, possession, and voiding a sale deed. The trial court rejected the impleadment application, holding that no relief was claimed against the corporation. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus to have a missing girl, aged 16 years and 8 months, returned to her parents. The girl had gone with an accused, Ganesh Mahadu Rangote, and gave birth to a three‑month‑old daughter. She was rescued and placed under the care of the Child Welfare Committee …
Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd, a license holder, had its drug manufacturing license suspended by the Joint Commissioner and Licensing Authority after a show‑cause notice citing breaches. The suspension order dated 18‑09‑2026 was to take effect on 22‑09‑2026, giving the company only a few days to file …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) deposited an amount equal to 50% of the compensation determined by an arbitrator, as ordered on 22 October 2024. On 6 March 2026, the court permitted the land‑owner respondents to withdraw that deposited amount. The court then ordered that execution of …
The appellants challenged a compensation award of Rs.1,500 per R for their agricultural land acquired for an irrigation tank, arguing that similar jirayat lands in the same village had been awarded Rs.3,000 per R in a related reference case. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had originally …
The petitioner, Pawan Sheshrao Bhaote, filed Writ Petition No.13370 of 2026 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition included representations dated 15 April 2026 and 23 July 2026. After hearing the matter, the Court …
The petitioner, Kalpana Rajesh Chavan, a Sarpanch of Kavada village, was disqualified by the District Collector under Section 14(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 on allegations of failing to hold Gram Sabha meetings and misappropriating Panchayat funds through cheques issued to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Principal District Judge in a civil appeal (Regular Civil Appeal No.197 of 2014). The petition sought to raise an exception to that order. However, the civil appeal was subsequently decided by a judgment dated 08 February 2016, thereby …
Petitioner Rajendra Madhav Kulkarni filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon dated 17 August 2024 which restored Regular Civil Suit No.20 of 2015 that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The suit, filed by respondent Ramesh Sampat More, …
The petitioners, a group of educational institutions, sought reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The State of Maharashtra and other respondents contested the claim, arguing that the reimbursement proposals required …
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 860‑1000 per R. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 2,047 per R, treating the land as dry land, and also …
Several educational institutions filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The petitioners argued that they were entitled to such reimbursement from the State of Maharashtra. The State …
The petitioners filed two criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Petition 1424 of 2021 was filed by the original informant seeking transfer of investigation and a fresh inquiry into Crime No.250/2020, lodged on 15 July 2020. The Court noted that a Resource Personnel …
The Bharatiya Gramin Punarrachna Sanstha filed a writ petition seeking inclusion of its name in the CAP (Community Action Programme) round. The petition was filed on the grounds that the decision on its proposal dated 30/12/2025 was pending despite the ongoing CAP rounds. The High Court, noting the …
The petitioners challenged the State of Maharashtra’s decision to discontinue the scheme of advance increments for employees under the 6th Pay Commission. The Court examined earlier government resolutions and circulars from 2009 and found they did not constitute a final decision to discontinue the …
The appellants challenged the award of Rs. 2,400 per are for land acquired for the Nimna Dudhna Project, contending that the land is irrigated and should attract Rs. 5,500 per are with escalation. They also disputed the compensation awarded for various fruit‑bearing trees, arguing that the private …
The applicants, parents of a minor, sought to quash FIR No. 359/2024 alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita, arguing it was a retaliatory "counter‑blast" after they filed a non‑cognizable receipt accusing the complainant of threats and assault. They contended that the FIR was false, …
The petitioner, Jayashri Vijaykumar Tekale, filed a writ petition against Vaijinath Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on multiple occasions, including the scheduled hearing on 6 January 2026 and the adjourned hearing on the same day, as well as on 8 …
The appellants' 3.68‑acre land in Mauje Jarul, Taluka Vaijapur was acquired for MIDC and they sought enhanced compensation through a land acquisition reference. The trial court dismissed their claim for failure to produce evidence, noting the original claimant had died on 14‑09‑2009, which prevented …
The applicant, Gulab Abdul Sayyad, sought withdrawal of Rs.7,95,079 deposited by the respondent/acquiring body, claiming entitlement to the amount with accrued interest. The respondent contested, arguing the enhancement exceeded nine times the original amount. The court, referring to similar cases …
Santosh Dagdu Mhase filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner later discovered an alternative remedy before an appellate authority and applied to withdraw the petition, requesting that the interim order already granted be continued for four …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained an application for condonation of delay filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. The Court allowed the condonation as per Prayer Clause ‘B’, ordered that the first appeal be registered, and directed that the parties, being ad idem, may have …
The applicant, Sunil Viswasrao Patil, sought anticipatory bail after his liberty had been protected by a prior order on 22 October 2024, which was based on the fact that co-accused had been granted pre‑arrest bail by the Sessions Court. The State opposed the application but could not differentiate …
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 106‑day delay in filing a second appeal in a civil suit. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found it was neither deliberate nor intentional. Consequently, the court granted condonation but imposed a condition that the …
The appellant, daughter of the deceased, sought a temporary injunction to restrain the respondents from creating any third‑party interest in several land parcels that form the subject of a partition suit. The suit for partition was dismissed by the trial court, but the trial court had earlier …
The petitioner, Sadanand Sakharam Hattiambire, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief directly from the court regarding his grievance. The Court examined whether the petitioner could approach the High Court …
The petitioners, a charitable trust and another entity, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009. The State of Maharashtra and other respondents contested the claim. The Court examined …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered writ petitions filed by subject teachers alleging that Clause 3 of the Government Resolution dated 13‑10‑2016 denied them the subject‑teacher pay scale, constituting discrimination. Relying on the earlier Nagpur Bench decision in Ganesh Mahadeo …
The petitioner, a doctor, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.4) to remove encroachments on municipal land and a municipal road in Shrigonda. He alleged that despite his representation, the corporation had only removed encroachments of …
The applicant, Devaji, filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his 2013 appeal for want of prosecution. The appeal had contested an earlier acquittal of accused persons on several IPC offences. The High Court had previously warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal. On …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …
Petitioners Vaishnavi Sudhakar Lolapod and another filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief pending a decision by the Scrutiny Committee. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, waived service of notice. The court noted that the Scrutiny …
The petitioner, Tarabai Vitthal Patil, filed a contempt petition (WP/4625/2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later sought liberty to withdraw the petition, stating a desire to take appropriate steps regarding the underlying controversy. The respondent, Sheetal …
Ms. Aishwarya N. Tanpure, filing a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, sought relief against the District Collector and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous because of the passage of time. The Court examined whether a writ petition can be …
The appellant's land in Wahegaon Sopara, Jalna district was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a percolation tank, with an initial compensation of Rs.1,545 per R, later enhanced to Rs.3,500 per R by a reference court. The appellant challenged this award, arguing that a previous First …
The applicant's counsel issued a notice informing the applicant of the withdrawal of the vakalatnama and the collection of case papers. Despite receiving the notice, the applicant failed to appear before the court. The respondent's counsel highlighted this non‑appearance. The court considered …
Several educational institutions filed writ petitions seeking reimbursement of fees paid for students admitted under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The petitioners argued that the State of Maharashtra was obligated to refund these fees but had not done so. The …
Sharda Bhavan Education Society challenged a government order that barred the introduction or expansion of pharmacy courses for the 2026-27 academic year. The society had applied to the Pharmacy Council of India for B.Pharm, D.Pharm and M.Pharm programmes; B.Pharm and M.Pharm were approved but the …
The applicants, Shriniwas Nanabhau Nagargoje and others, filed a criminal application seeking restoration of the original proceedings after they had been directed to amend their pleadings within a specified time. Although the amendment was eventually made, it was done beyond the time limit set by …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a criminal revision application filed by Shaikh Shakil Sayyad Sadik. The Court had earlier ordered the applicant to deposit Rs.25,000 on 4 January 2017, a direction that remained unfulfilled. On 12 August 2026, the Court granted a final …
The brothers Tushar and Nikhil Raut sought confirmation of their Scheduled Tribe status as Koli Mahadev, relying on a caste certificate issued by the S.D.O. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee rejected their claim, citing lack of proof, contradictory entries in birth‑death registers, …
The petitioner, Ramprasad Tulshiram Raut, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court had previously ordered on 10 March 2026 that the petition must be argued on the next date, otherwise it would be dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner failed to …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking restoration of a revision application (Criminal Revision Application No. 189/2024) that had been dismissed on 07/09/2026 for want of prosecution. The court considered whether the dismissal could be set aside. After hearing counsel, the court found …
Mahendra Pratapsing Rajput applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forgery, fraud and cheating under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had earlier granted interim protection on the condition that he attend the police station weekly. The applicant claimed he …
The appellant's land in Wahegaon Sopara, Jalna district was acquired under a 2008 notification for a percolation tank, with an initial compensation of Rs.1,545 per R fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. The appellant challenged this award, and a reference court raised the compensation to Rs.5,250 …
The petitioners, Govind Gangaptrao Ganapure and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled hearing dates of 06.01.2026 and 08.01.2026, despite the court granting an additional opportunity in the …
A contempt petition (No. 129 of 2013) was filed by Jakir, Akhtar and others against the State of Maharashtra alleging disobedience of an earlier order directing the Collector of Jalgaon to decide a representation within six weeks. The order required the Collector to instruct the Special Land …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions for the State of Maharashtra to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and to recalculate their pension benefits by including such increment. They relied on Rule 10 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations' decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had …
The Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust filed a civil application seeking the court's permission to implement a circulatory resolution dated 29 September 2025, which authorizes a donation of Rs.5 crore to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund. The court examined whether such a donation required judicial …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered to cancel the TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering, and therefore upheld the cancellation orders. However, the Court set aside the orders …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority …
The petitioner, Veej Kamgar Co-operative Credit Society, sought a writ directing Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd (MSEDCL) to accept two cheques issued by respondent No.6 and to refund the amounts to the society's members after recovering them from employees' salaries. The society …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court …
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a consolidated group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of approximately 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑tampering. The court examined the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The court …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results of thousands of candidates and their permanent debarment from future TET exams. The Court found that the examination authorities, acting under the …
The High Court examined a group of writ petitions filed by teachers and aspirants whose TET 2018 and 2019 results were cancelled after the Maharashtra State Examination Council discovered large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering affecting about 7,880 candidates. The petitioners argued that the cancellation …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority under the 1998 …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the State Council of Examinations had sufficient statutory authority …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) upheld the State’s order cancelling the TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results of thousands of candidates on the basis of proven mark‑sheet tampering, finding that the Council and the Commissioner had statutory authority to do so. However, the Court set aside the …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 10028 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. On 13 July 2026, the petition was listed for hearing but the petitioners' counsel was absent. The court noted the continued non-appearance of the petitioners' …
A batch of writ petitions filed by retired Maharashtra civil servants sought the grant of a notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and the recalculation of their pension benefits to include such increment. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra …
The petitioner challenged his preventive detention order dated 28‑08‑2025, issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, on the ground that the detaining authority had not established a live link between the alleged offences and a threat to public order, nor recorded …
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions filed by teachers and aspirants whose TET‑2018 and TET‑2019 results were cancelled after a police‑led investigation uncovered large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The petitioners argued that the cancellation and the …
Satyajeet Uday Shisode filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s directions in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, which outline entitlement to such additional amounts for landowners …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered under the 1998 Act and the 2010 Regulations to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of 7,880 candidates after verifying large‑scale mark tampering. The court found ample documentary and police evidence …
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations was empowered to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of about 7,880 candidates after finding substantial evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. The court found the Commissioner had authority under the 1998 Act and the 2010 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It set aside the order permanently debaring the petitioners from future TET exams, holding that the penalty was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2021 which remained pending for several years. On 14 January 2026, the court ordered the matter to be listed for dismissal, giving the petitioners another opportunity to appear. The petitioners failed to appear in both the morning and afternoon sessions on …
The acquiring body appealed a 2012 land acquisition award, and the claimant filed a cross‑objection 1,814 days late seeking enhanced compensation. The court was asked to condone the delay and determine the appropriate compensation for dry land. It allowed the civil application, condoned the delay, …
The petitioner, Ramamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, sought a court direction compelling the State of Maharashtra to permit the commencement of 8th standard classes for the academic year 2019‑2020, after its proposal was rejected by an unreasoned order dated 02‑05‑2018. The Court examined whether the …
The appellant, Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, appealed a 2012 judgment and award of compensation in a land‑acquisition case, alleging a deficit in the amount awarded to the claimant, Nagnath Gundappa Todkari. The claimant filed a cross‑objection seeking enhanced …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It set aside the order permanently debaring the …
Shabbir Daud Bagwan filed a writ petition (No. 76 of 2023) against the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. On 29 September 2023, the Court directed the petitioner to record the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner within two weeks. The petitioner failed …
The petitioners, Pandit Bhika Jadhav and Pramod Pandit Jadhav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No. 436/2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The informant, who had served as vice‑president and president of a trust from 2014 to …
The petitioner, Ulka Pradeep Jain, filed a writ petition seeking relief against M/s Tarkheda Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. J. M. Murkute, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after considering the application, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
Petitioners Arun Rangnath Sodalkar and another filed writ petition No. 11128 of 2014 against the Returning Officer, Grampanchayat, Beed and others. The petition sought relief concerning an election matter, but the petitioners' counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because of the …
The Executive Engineer, acting as the acquiring body, deposited the entire amount payable in the court, prompting the bench to convert the earlier stay order into an absolute stay. Consequently, the applications filed by the acquiring body were allowed and disposed of. In separate proceedings, a …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) filed civil applications seeking to enforce a stay that had been earlier granted. The appellant deposited the full payable amount in the court, leading the judge to convert the provisional stay into an absolute stay and to allow and dispose of those …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The applicant, Arjuna Vilasrao Shinge, was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that, owing to the arrest, there was nothing further to be considered and sought to withdraw the application …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results of thousands of candidates after finding that their mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of the candidates. The Court found that the Maharashtra State Council of …
The petitioners, comprising several individuals and heirs, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts that had been deposited by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, as part of an acquiring body. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State's and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently debaring the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners on the basis of large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. The Court found that the Commissioner of the Council …
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding large‑scale mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had authority under the 1998 Act to …
The High Court examined a massive tampering of marks in the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) in Maharashtra, where about 7,880 candidates had their answer sheets altered to inflate scores. The State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations cancelled the results of these …
The petitioners, comprising several individuals and heirs, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts that had been deposited by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, as part of an acquiring body. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, …
Dr. Praful Vishnupant Dhabekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. After hearing the arguments, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief sought. On the petitioner's instruction, the counsel sought permission to …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Finance Establishments) Act, 1999, originally in 2018. When the matter was called, the original counsel, Mr. Rahul G. Joshi, withdrew his instructions, and a replacement counsel, Mr. …
The petitioner, Syed Aziz Mohiuddin Mustafa Ali, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 140 of 2013) seeking a direction to decide his representation within a specified period. The court noted that the direction was originally issued in 2012 and, given the passage of time without any …
Petitioners Rasul Kharum Kha Pathan and another filed writ petition No.14681 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, M.B. Sandanshiv, was absent, and the court directed that the petitioners argue only on the maintainability issue. The court, after considering the …
The petitioner, AU Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra authorities had failed to hand over possession of a property despite a prior court order dated 16/09/2025. The court noted that the respondent's Advocate General indicated that possession …
Petitioner Prabhakar Namdev Sarag filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed through Advocate Ms. Tanuja D. Dhage on behalf of the petitioner. The Court first allowed correction of the respondent's …
The applicant, Vasant, filed a criminal revision seeking to quash the judgment of the Sessions Judge that upheld the acquittal of respondents Rajesh and Anil in a loan‑dispute case. Vasant alleged that the trial courts erred by not calling the investigating officer to record his evidence, which he …
Vilas Koli filed a writ petition challenging the execution of a possession decree arising from a 2001 suit against the heirs of Kadu Lahanu Koli. The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, ordered the execution of the possession warrant within four weeks, and imposed a cost of Rs.15,000 on …
The petitioner, Ranjana Ramjivan Teland, filed a civil application (No.11366 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Secretary of Bharat Liberal Education Society and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Anandsing Bayas, later sought leave to withdraw the …
The applicant, Haidar Azim Shaikh, was arrested in connection with the alleged theft of a buffalo (Crime No.0203/2025). During the pendency of his anticipatory bail application, the buffalo was recovered from the informant's agricultural field, establishing that the alleged stolen property was no …
The applicant, convicted under Sections 7, 8, 11(4) and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Sections 341 and 506 of the IPC, was sentenced to three years' imprisonment. The High Court had earlier suspended his sentence on 12 October 2023. He filed a criminal …
The petitioner, Rahul Dharma Kalunke, filed a criminal revision application (No. 10671 of 2026) but delayed filing it by four days. The petitioner sought condonation of this delay. The Court examined the reasons provided in the application and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court …
The High Court of Bombay entertained three civil applications arising from a dispute between United India Insurance Company Ltd and Shubham Sharadra Kale et al. The first application sought condonation of a 95‑day delay in filing a first appeal, which the court allowed in the interest of justice. …
The applicant, Vikas Vishwanath Dolas, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,45,000. He filed a criminal revision application seeking suspension of the sentence, offering to deposit an additional …
The petitioner, Vaishali Vivek Padkantwar, filed a writ petition against the District Collector and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel later submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court considered the submission and found no merit in continuing …
The petitioners, a large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants, sought directions for the State to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and to recalculate their pension benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil …
The petitioners, Vandanabai BhauSaheb Desale and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Balu Namdev Patil and another. During the proceedings, the parties reached a compromise settlement. The petitioners' counsel submitted that, in view of the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the State to acquire their lands as per proposals dated 26/03/2015 and to pay compensation. The respondents submitted an affidavit stating that the acquisition process is proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, with …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a motion to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning multiple first appeals relating to land acquisition compensation. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed and should be …
Gauri Shriprasad Ladda and others filed Writ Petition No. 12101 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the non‑decision of their representation dated 17 July 2025 by Respondent No.10. The petition sought a directive for the respondent to consider the representation on its …
The Chief Officer Municipal Council, Tuljapur appealed judgments and awards dated 29 July 2016 that granted compensation in land acquisition matters (L.A.R. Nos.11 and 12 of 2013). The appellant argued that the controversy was identical to that already decided in First Appeal No.237 of 2017, which …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants contended that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The …
The Chief Officer Municipal Council appealed judgments awarding compensation in two land acquisition cases (Surekha Rajendra Sonji and Anand Sahebrao Sonji). The appellant argued that the controversy was identical to matters previously decided by this Court in First Appeal No.237 of 2017 and First …
The State of Maharashtra challenged a Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal order that altered the seniority of a clerk, Madansingh Gusinge, by considering his seniority from the date he passed the Sub Services Departmental (SSD) examination on 15‑02‑2012, rather than from his date of joining in 2009. …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a large group of writ petitions (numbers 904‑931) that raised the issue of whether Medical Officers are entitled to engage in private practice and receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the matter had already been decided in a …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of first appeals related to land acquisition in Latur. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were improperly clubbed with First …
The petitioners, all holders of M.Phil degrees and recipients of fellowships from BARTI or BANRF, filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a directive for the university to constitute a Research Recommendation Committee and to admit them to the Ph.D. programme without undergoing the Ph.D. …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 by deleting First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 from the title clause as urged by the appellants. The court partially allowed the appeals of both the claimants and the acquiring body and affirmed compensation of …
The wife filed an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, alleging domestic violence, but the Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed it after the wife admitted no violence. The wife appealed to the Sessions Court, which, without hearing the husband, set aside …
The United India Insurance Company applied to the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of a 3,120‑day delay in filing an application to bring the legal heirs of a deceased claimant (respondent No.6) on record and to set aside the abatement of its claim. The original claimants (respondents Nos.1‑5) …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions and civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging various orders of the State of Maharashtra. On 1 September 2026, respondents argued that the matters were already decided in Writ Petition No.13945/2025 of this Court and …
Minakshi Ramesh Vedpathak, a former headmistress, was convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a Rs.1,000 bribe, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. She filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the …
The applicant, Vandana Sugriv Gadhave, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount she had deposited in the High Court as security following an impugned judgment and award. The respondent, Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd, opposed the withdrawal, arguing that the deceased’s risk was …
The petitioners, a large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants, sought directions that the State grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July, even though they retired on or after 30 June, and that their pension benefits be recalculated to include such increment. They relied on Rule …
A large group of retired government employees filed writ petitions seeking the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, arguing that they had served with good conduct for more than six months in the relevant year. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the …
A large group of retired civil servants filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the annual increment, as provided under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, in their retirement benefits. They argued that having served at least six months in the year preceding …
A large group of civil servants who retired after serving at least six months in the last financial year sought directions that the State of Maharashtra grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July and recalculate their pension benefits accordingly. The petitioners relied on Rule 10 of the …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions for the State of Maharashtra to grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July and to recalculate their retirement benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) …
The petitioner, Ravindra Shesherao Rathodkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After the hearing had commenced, the petitioner, through his counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, upon oral instructions from the …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions that the State of Maharashtra grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July, even though they retired after that date, and recalculate their pensionary benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions seeking notional/annual increments that became due on 1 July after their retirement, arguing that they had served at least six months in the relevant year. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions that the State of Maharashtra grant them the notional annual increment due on 1 July and recalculate their retirement benefits to include this increment, arguing that they had served at least six months in the relevant …
A large group of retired government employees filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the annual increment, as provided under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, in their retirement benefits. The petitioners argued that having served at least six months in the …
The petitioners, retired government employees, sought directions for the grant of a notional annual increment that became due on 1 July after their retirement, invoking Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. They contended that having served with good conduct for at …
The case concerns the acquisition of land for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation based on a pre‑notification sale (Exhibit 21) and the reference court enhanced the award to Rs.1,40,000 per …
The GMIDC, as the acquiring authority, appealed a reference court award that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank. The land was taken under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with possession taken in 1994 and the award declared later. The …
The claimants filed multiple civil applications seeking to have the legal heirs/representatives of the deceased brought on record in the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra. The court examined whether such amendment could be permitted. It observed that the names of the legal heirs were already …
The petitioners, original claimants, filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their appeals. The court heard arguments from both sides. It noted that similar delays had been condoned in related appeals. Relying on the reasons set out in the applications, the court granted …
The dispute arose from a land acquisition proceeding where the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad awarded compensation on 30‑04‑2012. The claimant, Limbrij Gundappa Todkari, challenged the award alleging deficient compensation and filed a first appeal (FA‑1412/2018). He also filed a …
The acquiring body, Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, appealed a 2012 award of compensation in a land acquisition matter. The claimant, Limbrij Gundappa Todkari, filed a cross‑objection after a delay of 1,814 days, seeking enhanced compensation for his dry land. The Court …
The petitioners, a large group of retired government employees, sought directions for the State of Maharashtra to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July, after their retirement, and to recalculate their pension benefits accordingly. They relied on Rule 10 of the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard writ petitions filed by Akash Nandu Range and Laxman Bhagwan Ghorpade seeking a direction for the Scrutiny Committee to decide their pending tribe‑validity claims. The petitions alleged that the claims had been pending since December 2025 and …
The High Court heard two writ petitions filed by Akash Nandu Range and Laxman Bhagwan Ghorpade seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide their pending tribe validity claims, which had been awaiting decision since December 2025 and December 2024 respectively. The petitioners, who are …
Vikram Arjun Bhandarwad filed Writ Petition No.13129 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition sought a correction in the minutes of the order dated 28/09/2026. The court noted that in paragraph 5, line 2, the reference to “Section 6(B)(1)” was erroneous and should read …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, sought direction that they be granted the notional annual increment due on 1 July and that their pensionary benefits be recalculated to include this increment. They relied on Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, filed writ petitions seeking notional annual increments and recalculation of their pension benefits, contending that they were entitled to such increments under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The Court …
The petitioners, a large group of retired Maharashtra civil servants, sought directions for the State to grant them the notional annual increment that became due on 1 July after their retirement, arguing that they had served with good conduct for more than six months in the relevant year. They …
The petitioners, retired civil servants of Maharashtra, sought directions that they be granted the notional annual increment due on 1 July and that their pensionary benefits be recalculated to include this increment, invoking Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009. The …
The petitioners, a group of retired government employees, sought directions that their retirement benefits be recalculated to include the annual increment under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, arguing that they had served at least six months in the relevant year …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw it after the charge-sheet had been filed. The counsel for the applicants argued that the withdrawal should be allowed with liberty to file a fresh application if needed. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The …
M/s. Arihant Auto Care Center filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India. The Court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant the relief sought. The petitioner’s counsel then requested permission to withdraw the petition to avoid …
A large group of retired government employees filed writ petitions seeking the inclusion of the notional annual increment, under Rule 10 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, in their retirement benefits. The petitioners argued that having served at least six months in the …
Anitabai Santosh Nikam filed a writ petition seeking direction for the payment of ex-gratia assistance/insurance cover from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner alleged that the payment had not been made. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents informed the Court that the …
The petitioner, Sadashiv Sanap, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash a police letter dated 06/06/2019 that closed investigation into Crime No.588 of 2016 and to set aside a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 21/09/2019 rejecting his earlier application. The High Court examined the police …
The New India Assurance Company filed a first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in a motor accident claim. The company subsequently accepted the Tribunal's award, deposited the compensation amount with the court registry, and filed a withdrawal pursis dated …
The petitioner, Dushyant Madhavrao Borade, challenged an order dated 27 August 2026 issued by the Tahsildar, Mantha, which directed the creation of an approach road from the petitioner's land (Gut Nos. 325 and 1) to benefit another landowner. The Tahsildar had earlier conducted a Panchanama and …
The New India Assurance Company filed a first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in a motor accident claim. The company subsequently accepted the Tribunal's award, deposited the compensation amount with the court registry, and submitted a withdrawal pursis …
The petitioners challenged the order of the District Judge rejecting their appeal against a civil judge’s refusal to stay a municipal notice ordering removal of unauthorized constructions. The notice, issued under Sections 179 and 189 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 and Sections …
The petitioner filed a criminal revision application (ST) No.11881 of 2024. The court had previously warned that if the applicant failed to appear on the next date, the matter would be presumed abandoned and dismissed. On the scheduled date, no representative of the applicant appeared. Consequently, …
Dr. Reena Shriprakash Jaiswal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief, the specifics of which were not detailed in the judgment. After hearing arguments, the Court indicated it was not inclined …
The applicant, Sitaram Rabhaji Wanve, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1821 of 2024) after a charge sheet was filed against him. The trial court had already granted regular bail to the applicant upon his appearance. The State of Maharashtra opposed the anticipatory bail but did not …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a series of contempt petitions (Nos. 57/2023, 673/2023, 258/2024, 393/2023, 260/2024, 259/2024, 86/2024, 87/2024 and 897/2024) arising from various civil matters. Petitioners submitted that they had complied with the orders previously issued in …
A series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) were filed by various petitioners against Rajgopal Deora and others. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Sharad S. Shinde and Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar, argued that the contempt orders had not been complied …
The petitioners filed a series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) against various respondents alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioners argued that the contempt orders had been complied with, rendering the petitions …
A series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) were filed by various petitioners against Rajgopal Deora and others. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Sharad S. Shinde and Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar, argued that the contempt orders had not been complied …
A series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) were filed by various petitioners against Rajgopal Deora and others. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Sharad S. Shinde and Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar, argued that the contempt orders had not been complied …
The petitioner, Shubhesh Dilip Jain, filed a writ petition and a related civil application (No. 12522 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Mr. B. R. Warma, while Respondent No.1 was represented by Advocate Mr. V. Y. Bhide. The court …
The petitioner, Santosh Bhikaji Mote, filed an application seeking condonation of a two‑day delay in filing his criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. The application was supported by Advocate Balasaheb N. Magar, while the State was represented by Advocate G. O. Wattamwar. The sole issue …
Vishnu Nivrutti Koli filed a writ petition challenging the order that disqualified him from the post of Sarpanch. The petitioner argued that the disqualification was illegal. The court observed that the term of the Gram Panchayat had already expired on 10 February 2026, leaving no operative issue to …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard three first appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against various respondents. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw all the appeals on instructions, and the court granted the leave, disposing the appeals as withdrawn. …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging actions of the Pharmacy Council of India. The court noted that, due to the passage of time, the petitions had become infructuous. No substantive merits were addressed. Consequently, the court disposed of all the writ petitions as infructuous.
The petitioners, school teachers, claimed they were harassed and unlawfully terminated by school management and sought condonation of a 374‑day delay in filing appeals before the School Tribunal. The Education Officer and Deputy Director had directed that the teachers continue in service and advised …
The petitioners filed writ petitions (WP No. 10959/2016 and WP No. 10961/2016) challenging certain orders in civil suits. Respondents submitted that the original plaintiff was ready to add the Wakf Board as a party‑defendant in both suits. The court accepted this statement as an undertaking. On that …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief in two suits. The respondents informed the court that the original plaintiff intended to implead the Wakf Board as a party-defendant in both suits. The court treated this statement as a formal undertaking. Accepting the undertaking, the court …
The petitioners filed a civil application (No. 11378 of 2026) seeking to amend their main writ petition (WP No. 1778 of 2026) at the pre‑admission stage. The Court examined the application and, noting that it was filed before the writ petition was admitted, allowed the amendment. The petitioners …
The applicants, representing the estate of the deceased Radhakishan Bhaulrao Karhale, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,007‑day delay in filing their first appeal against a decree of the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, the State and its authorities, did not contest the …
The applicants, who are the original claimants in a land acquisition reference (L.A.R. No.329 of 2010), filed a First Appeal challenging the judgment and award dated 06.02.2014 passed by the Reference Court, Jalna, seeking enhancement of compensation. The appeal was filed with a delay of 3115 days, …
The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Company challenging awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer submitted an email instruction, on behalf of its advocate Mr. R.H. Dahat, to withdraw …
Uttam Ramdas Chavan filed a criminal revision application against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, noting its earlier reluctance to entertain the matter, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The appellants owned 82 R of dry land in Jalna district that was acquired for the Nimnna Dudhana Project. The original award under the Land Acquisition Act paid Rs 656 per R, which was later enhanced by the Reference Court to Rs 1,200 per R. The appellants appealed, seeking further enhancement based …
Hanmant Raju Jabde applied for regular bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant had previously been granted bail for an earlier FIR involving sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The present FIR, registered …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through its legal hub, filed several first appeals (Nos. 1677 of 2016, 5016 of 2017, 5015 of 2017, and 5007 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The appellant, represented by Mr. Arun G. Kanade, sought leave of the court to withdraw all the …
Syed Mujah ed Alam filed a contempt petition alleging that Police Inspector Nirmala Pardeshi failed to obey a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 28‑04‑2025 directing a reinvestigation of Crime No.240 of 2022 and the hand‑over of the case to another investigating officer. The respondent filed an …
The petitioners, Arjun Damu Gulmkar and others, filed a writ petition seeking that the State of Maharashtra initiate land acquisition proceedings and pay compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondent …
The petitioners sought to frame a scheme for the Shri Mallikarjun Manwat Trust under Section 50-A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, but the approved scheme omitted any reference to the First Board of Trustees. They filed a revision petition under Section 70-A before the Joint Charity …
The petitioner, Vitthal alias Mauli Tukaram Patil, filed a successive bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor argued that the applicant had not disclosed any prior bail applications and that a subsequent bail plea must be based on a …
The appeal concerned lands acquired from a village for the MIDC Dhule project, originally awarded compensation in 2005 and 2011. The claimants argued that the matter was identical to a prior decision (FA No. 1210/12) and sought a higher market value and statutory benefits. The Court accepted that …
The petitioner, Bhausahab Sundarrao Ghatul, filed a contempt petition (CP No. 599 of 2019) arising from a civil application (No. 2761 of 2020). The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the order of contempt had been fully complied with. The Court examined whether any issue remained pending …
The petitioners sought permission to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record in the pending suit. An application (CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13167 OF 2025) was filed for this purpose, and a separate application (CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2025) requested condonation of a …
The petitioners, who were original defendants in a 2011 partition suit, claimed they were misled into believing the suit only concerned Gut No.140 because a prior partition of the ancestral property had been effected in 1955. Relying on mutation records, they argued they did not oppose the suit and …
Ahmadoddin Wahidoddin Tadvi filed a writ petition in 2015 challenging a 1994-95 recruitment process, alleging that a lower‑ranked candidate was appointed over him. The High Court dismissed the petition on the grounds of delay and laches. In 2026 Tadvi filed a review application contending that the …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition (No. 427 of 2020) arising from WP No. 5690/2015, alleging non-compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioners' counsel, Mr. Tushar Shinde, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court examined the submission and found no …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mehedi Rahim Hannure in connection with criminal case No. 266/2025 alleging assault, robbery and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The informant alleged that the applicant broke a …
Abdul Rashid Hamid Ansari applied for anticipatory bail before the High Court after the Additional Sessions Court had rejected his bail application on 15 September 2026. The charge-sheet against him was filed later on 19 September 2026, prompting the High Court to hold that it could not entertain …
