Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 9201–9400

NIDHI DHIRAJ KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Two writ petitions were filed by Swarnandini Tanaji Dabade and Nidhi Dhiraj Koli seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide their pending tribe‑validity claims, which had been awaiting decision since May 2024 and September 2023 respectively. The petitions limited their prayer to an …

MANOHAR GOVINDRAO GAJAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Manohar Govindrao Gajare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any appropriate remedy …

MADHUSUDAN BABULAL BHARTIYAversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Madhusudan Babulal Bhartiya, challenged an order dated 17 July 2019 issued by the learned Arbitrator and District Collector, Aurangabad, which rejected his arbitration application concerning land acquired under the National Highways Authority. The respondent argued that the …

SANJAY S/O. NANA AHIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Sanjay, was convicted by the JMFC and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under IPC sections 451 and 354, based on testimonies of four prosecution witnesses. He filed a criminal revision under Section 397 CrPC challenging both the conviction and the sentence, …

JAMIR WAJIR SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

Jamir Wajir Shaikh filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1456 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking an adjournment on the ground of the unavailability of Ms. Sunita Sonawane. The petitioner’s counsel alleged that the adjournment was necessary, but the court noted that the …

MANTHAN MOHAN NIMBALKARversusSnehal A Govekar

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondent's Scrutiny Committee had not decided his tribe claim within the time prescribed by a prior High Court order. The Court heard the matter and the respondent’s Additional Government Pleader, on instruction, undertook that the pending …

MANOJ LAXMAN ROUTREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Manoj Routre was convicted by a Special/Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case for rape under Section 376(2)(l) of the IPC, based on DNA evidence and the prosecution’s claim that the victim was mentally challenged. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of his sentence and bail, …

MADHUKAR TUKARAM PANDITversusTHE NANDED WAGHALA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Madhukar Tukaram Pandit, filed a writ petition challenging the Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation. After arguing, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition and to make a comprehensive representation to the corporation. The Court, after hearing, granted leave to …

BABUMIYA AHMEDSAB SHAIKH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The petitioners, Babumiya Ahmedsab Shaikh and others, filed a criminal application seeking to bring the legal heirs of respondent No.2 (the informant) on record in a pending criminal revision. The court considered the procedural propriety of allowing the legal heirs to be added to the revision …

JAYANT ANANDRAO KULKARNI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, represented by Advocate Ramesh V. Naiknaware, moved the court to correct the minutes of an order dated 22 September 2026, alleging that First Appeal numbers 2819, 2820 and 2818 of 2016 were incorrectly listed. The court examined whether it could amend its own order to delete the …

TRIMBAK ANANDA DAFALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Trimbak Ananda Dafal, filed a contempt petition (No. 160 of 2020) arising out of Writ Petition No. 7293 of 2019, alleging non-compliance with a contempt order. The petitioner was represented by Mr. P.B. Salunke, appearing on behalf of Mr. V.G. Salgare. The respondent State of …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusBHAMABAI LAXMAN JADHAV

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment and award dated 26 March 2009 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, concerning land acquired for the Terna Medium Project at Makni. The respondent, Bhamabai Laxman Jadhav, had claimed compensation for the acquired land. The High Court noted that it …

MAHENDRA SITARAM BARELAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal appeal against Mahendra Sitram Barela. The appeal was filed 86 days after the prescribed period, prompting a petition for condonation of delay. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused under procedural law. It held that the 86‑day delay was …

NITIN BAPURAO MOHITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Nitin Bapurao Mohite and Radhesham Panjabrao Bhalerao, accused in a kidnapping‑ransom case registered as Crime No.597 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that abducted an elderly man and demanded a Rs 1 crore …

RAJENDRA S/O. DILIPSINGH TEHRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rajendra Dilipsingh Tehra, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent State of Maharashtra filed a 'B Summary' report, which, according to the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, rendered the pending application infructuous. On this …

SHABANA SHAIKH YUNUSversusABDUL HAMID ABDUL GAFUR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Shabana Shaikh Yunus filed writ petition No. 13565 of 2019 in the High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad bench, against Abdul Hamid Abdul Gafur and another seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the cause of action had become infructuous. The court noted this submission and …

RATNAMALA PRALHAD SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Ratnamala Pralhad Salve filed a writ petition seeking an appointment as Anganwadi Sevika, invoking two government resolutions dated 12 March 2008 and 13 August 2014. The petitioner asked the court to direct the respondent authority to decide her claim and issue an appointment order. The …

MANIKCHAND MADANLAL GANGWALversusASHVIN ANIL MULE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Manikchand Madanlal Gangwal filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gevrai, which had rejected his application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC in suit No. 927 of 2021. The petitioner argued that the order …

MANOJ P GADEKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

KISHOR ARVIND PURIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 LATUR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

NARAYAN PARUMAL LALWANIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER 2 JALGAON AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

NARAYAN PARUMAL LALWANIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

RAMESH KISAN KHEDKARversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

MADAN GANGADHAR BIDARKARversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …

BALAJI MAROTI BANBAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Balaji Maroti Banbare, challenged the award dated 13 June 2019 of the Reference Court in L.A.R. No. 225/2012, seeking full compensation for his house property acquired for the Lendi project. The Reference Court had granted only a 40% enhancement over the basic award, rejecting the …

HANMANT RAJARAM BANBAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant challenged a 2019 award that enhanced compensation for a house acquired for the Lendi project only by 40% of the private valuer's assessment. The private valuer’s report valued the property at Rs. 2,76,356, but the Reference Court had granted only Rs. 34,930 in addition to the original …

VINOD PREMCHAND SURANAversusTHE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Vinod Premchand Surana filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme …

VIKAS EKNATH BHAGWATversusMANISHA VIKAS BHAGWAT

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vikas Eknath Bhagwat, filed a writ petition (No. 3469 of 2017) arising out of H.M.P. No.65 of 2016. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be entertained despite the earlier proceedings. The court examined the status of H.M.P. No.65 of 2016 and found that it had …

KRISHANA W/O. SANDEEP BARDAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Krishana filed an application seeking cancellation of bail (No. 150 of 2019) in a criminal case. Respondent No.3, appearing via video conference, informed the court that the substantive case had already been decided and there was no pending issue. The court, noting the submission that the matter was …

WASIM KHAN S/O. YUSUF KHANversusANJUM MUMTAZ W/O. WASIM KHAN AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Wasim Khan, filed a criminal application (No. 3133 of 2018) and a revision (Rev. No. 315/2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. He argued that the trial court had already disposed of the main criminal matter during the pendency of these applications. He contended that …

BALAJI NAMDEV DAPKE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged a 2019 award by the Reference Court that granted compensation of Rs 68,928 with only a 40% enhancement for their house acquired for the Lendi project, arguing that the court should have accepted the private valuer’s report of Rs 2,29,916 in full. The respondents contended …

Tushar Murlidhar BaviskarversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Tushar Murlidhar Baviskar filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra failed to decide his tribe claims by the deadline of 22‑09‑2025 as ordered. The State’s Advocate General acknowledged the delay, citing subsequent events that prevented the orders, and promised that the …

SHANKAR BALASAHEB RAUT AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …

JAGANNTH TRIMBAK MARKEversusLAXMI GAJANAN SALUNKE

DISMISSED

The appellant, Jagannth Trimbak Marke, filed a first appeal (No. 3039 of 2013) against the order in Civil Application No. 15368 of 2013. During the hearing, the appellant, through counsel, expressed a desire to discontinue prosecution of the appeal and sought the court's permission to withdraw it. …

JAGANNTH TRIMBAK MARKEversusLAXMI GAJANAN SALUNKE

DISMISSED

The appellant, Jagannath Trimbak Marke, filed a first appeal but later instructed his counsel to withdraw the appeal. The appellant’s counsel, Mr. Kalyan Patil, communicated this request to the court. The learned Judge, Rohit W. Joshi, allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn and …

BHAGWAN DEORAO HAMBARDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appeal challenges a 2014 award of compensation in a land acquisition case. The appellant argued that the dispute is identical to matters previously decided by this Court in First Appeal No.67 of 1997 and First Appeal No.1264 of 2017. Both the State and the acquiring authority accepted this view. …

BANABAI BAJRANG RAJPUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Banabai Bajrang Rajput filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of a direction dated 21 November 2011 and 2 December 2011 for payment of rental compensation. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the applications had already been decided and …

WAMANRAO VINAYAKRAO SHEPversusKAMLAKAR RAMBHAU GANDAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 735 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, on 13 August 2026, the petitioner issued a written instruction indicating a desire to discontinue the proceedings. The court recorded this instruction and, after considering the withdrawal, …

PRAKASH BABURAO KADUSKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Prakash Baburao Kaduskar appealed for bail and suspension of a 20‑year sentence imposed for offences under Sections 354, 376(2)(i)(j)(n), 376(3), 506 of the IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, the victim was almost 16 and had a consensual …

SAMEER ASHARAF TADAVIversusYASIM SAMEER TADAVI

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant failed to appear before the High Court on two consecutive dates despite a clear warning that non‑appearance would be taken as lack of interest. The Court reiterated that if no one appeared for the applicant on the next date, it would presume the applicant was not interested in …

ULHAS RANJIT DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

In a criminal appeal (No. 804 of 2026) filed by Ulhas Ranjit Deshmukh against the State of Maharashtra, the High Court at Aurangabad addressed procedural matters. The court issued a notice to the State, directing that it be returned by 15 October 2026. The appellant, through counsel, waived service …

ULHAS RANJIT DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Ulhas Ranjit Deshmukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhoom, for an offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three months' imprisonment. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the hearing of …

PUNAM AMIT CHATE AND ORSversusKRISHNA LAXMAN GENDALE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, heirs of the deceased Amit Chate, filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, which was decided by the M.A.C.T., Beed on 20 February 2016. They sought to appeal the tribunal's judgment but filed the appeal 159 days late, and therefore filed a …

SUNIL PARBHATRAO CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sunil Parbhatrao Chaudhari filed an application seeking to fix Application for Leave to Appeal (ALS) No.143 of 2022 for final hearing. The applicant argued that the reasons stated in the application warranted scheduling the appeal. The High Court examined the content of the application and found the …

SHAKIL KHAJASAB PATELversusSIKANDAR EKBAL PATEL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Sikandar Ekbal Patel filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1726 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a disinclination to grant any relief. On the instructions of the applicant, …

SURAJ SARDARSINGH CHAVHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered an application by Suraj Sardarsingh Chavhan, convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape, seeking suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. The applicant argued that the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor, citing the absence of a birth certificate and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OSMANABADversusKISAN NAMDEV WAIKAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimant sought to withdraw a portion of compensation deposited by the State Government in the reference court, relying on a prior order in the same matter. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% of the amount upon an undertaking and 25% upon furnishing a solvent security, with the remaining 25% to …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OSMANABADversusKISAN NAMDEV WAIKAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimant sought to withdraw a portion of compensation deposited by the State Government in the reference court, relying on a prior order in Mahadev Kisan Waikar v. State of Maharashtra. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% upon an undertaking and 25% upon furnishing solvent security, with the …

DHANAJI GANPAT KHOMANEversusUTRESHWAR GANPAT KHOMANE

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Dhanaji Ganpat Khomane filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his suit for default by the Trial Court. The petitioner had also filed an application (Civil M.A. No.943/2025) seeking restoration of the suit before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Beed. The respondent argued …

VIJAY BHAUSAHEB SHINDE AND OTHERSversusFAKIRA CHILLOBA SHINDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petition arose from an order of the Tahsildar, Rahuri, confirming the existence of a 2‑3 foot customary pathway on the boundary of Gats 224 and 225 and directing the removal of an obstruction allegedly caused by the petitioners. The petitioners contended that the panchnama produced under Section …

SANATKUMAR BHALCHANDRA JAINversusPRASHANT BHGWANSINGH KACHWAH

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sanatkumaar Bhalchandra Jain, filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw Rs.3,00,000 that had been deposited by the respondent, Prashant Bhagwansingh Kachwah, as security following the suspension of the respondent's sentence. The amount was already in the court …

CHAVALIBAI MULCHAND RATHODversusTHE COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND ORS

DISMISSED

The appellant, Chavalibai Mulchand Rathod, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation for fruit‑bearing trees on land acquired for the Minor Irrigation Tank Londhari Project. The reference court had determined compensation for the land but rejected the …

RADHESHAM PANJABRAO BHALERAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered bail applications filed by Nitin Bapurao Mohite and Radhesham Panjabrao Bhalerao, accused in a kidnapping‑ransom case registered as Crime No.597 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that abducted an elderly man …

SHAILESH SAMBHRAO BORLEPWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Withdrawn

The applicant, Shailesh Sambhrao Borlepwar, filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw the application and to raise all grounds before the trial court, noting that charges had already been framed and two witnesses examined. The respondent State of Maharashtra opposed the request. …

NISAR AHMED SHAFIQUE AHMED (MANIYA)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

RULE ABSOLUTE

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …

MOHAMMAD SIDDIQUE ASHRAF TADVI BHEELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

RULE ABSOLUTE

The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had the statutory authority to …

THE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCOversusRADHABAI PRABHULAL JAISWAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) had deposited Rs.1,18,70,800 as directed by the Court, but only 70% of that amount was to be released to the claimants upon furnishing an undertaking, with the balance contingent on a solvent surety. The Acquiring Body filed a civil application seeking …

THE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCOversusRADHABAI PRABHULAL JAISWAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) deposited Rs.1,18,70,800/- as directed by the Bombay High Court and sought to withdraw the amount. The Court noted that the Respondent, Radhabai Prabhulal Jaiswal, had only deposited 70% of the amount as per earlier orders, and the Court’s established …

NAVNATH VISHNU MADKE AND ANOTHERversusUDDHAV ANKUSH MADKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a common order dated 21.08.2023 in which the trial court allowed a second application for a fresh Court Commissioner report in a boundary dispute suit (RCS No.237/2015). They argued that once an earlier application had been allowed and a report submitted, the court should …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusNAMDEV BALIRAM RANKHAMB

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,966‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award rendered by a learned Reference Court. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard arguments from both parties. The court examined the reasons for the delay as set …

BHAUSAHEB KASHINATH KADNARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

Bhausaheb Kashinath Kadnar filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1674 of 2022 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to remove office objections and did not obtain the required circulation after filing the petition. The court observed that this indicated a lack of interest in …

RASIK SHANITLAL KOTHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Rasik Shanitlal Kothari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging Crime No. 311/2015 of Jawaharnagar Police Station. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the underlying criminal case had already been quashed on compromise in Criminal Application No. 184 of 2022. …

SHARAD KISAN BHUMBARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Sharad Kisan Bhumbar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, finding no impediment, …

SURESH BANSI LABADE AND ANOTHERversusTHE TAHASILDAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Suresh Bansi Labade and another, filed a writ petition asserting ownership of a property based on a registered sale deed dated 31.01.1989 and a registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the court's order dated 04.03.2026 …

Reliance General Insurance Co LtdversusManisha Shriram Ransing

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd filed a civil application seeking a stay of proceedings. The applicant’s counsel submitted that, following the court’s order dated 24‑12‑2025, the entire amount directed by the court had been deposited. The court considered the submission and, finding no …

PANDIT PUNDALIK DAFALversusBHIKADAS RAMBHAJI MHASKE AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, a 66‑year‑old retired bank employee, sought cancellation of a non‑bailable warrant issued after he failed to pay the full Rs.5,00,000 conditionally required for suspension of his sentence. The High Court noted that while the applicant had paid Rs.2,43,000, he had not deposited the …

Shantaram Tryabak AparversusRAJESH KUMAR I A S Secretary

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shantaram Tryabak Apar, filed a continuous petition (No. 893 of 2025) seeking relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court had previously directed that a certain amount be paid to the petitioner. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Badribishan A. Darak, informed …

IMRAN KHAN MUSTAK KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation of Crime No. 213 of 2022, originally registered with the City Police Station, Jalgaon. The Court examined the Resource Personnel report and found that a Sessions case (No. 104 of 2024) concerning the same offence …

SANTOSH GOVINDRAO DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Santosh Govindrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the case, the sole petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court of the death, raising the question of the petition’s continuance. The Court …

SONAL RAVINDRA MAHADWARversusNAMDEV AMBADAS RATHOD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The respondents filed a civil suit for declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction against the petitioner. After a temporary injunction was rejected, the plaintiffs sought to withdraw the suit and were granted liberty by the trial court to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action, with …

AVINASH ALIAS BATLYA SAHEBRAO INGOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Avinash alias Batlya Sahebrao Ingole, aged 23, was arrested on 16‑12‑2021 in connection with a murder and related offences under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. After more than four years of pre‑trial detention, he applied for regular bail, claiming …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBHAURAO BALI RANKHAMB

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,966‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award rendered by a learned Reference Court. The primary issue before the court was whether such a lengthy delay could be condoned under the principles of natural justice and …

SANTOSH DAMODHAR ARAGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The appellant, Santosh Damodhar Aragade, appealed against his conviction under Sections 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly pulling down a revenue officer who was on duty, causing injury. The prosecution presented the complainant’s testimony supported by two independent eyewitnesses …

SHAHU S/O. DAGADU KAMBLE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISMISSED

The applicants, Shahu S/o Dagadu Kamble and others, filed a criminal application (No. 3490 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The record showed that on three prior occasions, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. …

RAMCHANDRA MADHAVRAO MUNDHEversusVIJAYMALA RAOSAHEB UPASE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ramchandra Madhavrao Mundhe, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of this petition, the related regular civil suit (No. 121 of 2022) was disposed of by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mukhed. The petitioner submitted …

JANARDHAN DIGAMBAR KALUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent Gram Rojgar Sevaks. The Court noted that the petitioners were appointed only on a temporary scheme and had not been appointed to a …

RAMRAO DEVIDAS MUNDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure, who had been employed on a temporary Gram Rojgar Sevak scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent employees. The High Court examined whether a temporary appointment …

NANA BHAGWAN BANGAR AND OTHERSversusMACHINDRA APPARAO ANDHARE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the civil court's refusal to appoint a commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC for a 2014 suit seeking perpetual injunction. They alleged that the suit was stayed and sought a stay of the suit proceedings, claiming prejudice to the defendant. …

SHYAMRAO PANDURANG CHAVAN AND OTHERSversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

A writ petition (No. 12234 of 2018) was filed by Shyamrao Pandurang Chavan and others against the Union of India. The Court had issued a specific order on 30 July 2026 directing the petitioners to appear. On 10 September 2026, the petitioners failed to appear despite the order. No counsel was …

SUDHIR SUBHASH SONTAKKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by various educational institutions and individuals against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitions raised procedural objections termed as "office objections" that were pending before the court. The …

SANVAR BAIG SHABBIR BAIGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sanvar Baig Shabbir Baig, filed Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel D. K. Dagadkhair, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …

SANDIP BABURAO GORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the counsel for the applicants sought permission to withdraw the pending application and to file a fresh one. The respondent State opposed the request. The Court examined …

SUNIL DHUDA CHITTE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants, Sunil Dhuda Chitte and others, filed a criminal application seeking relief, but they had already filed an application for discharge in the trial court, which remained pending. The State argued that the pending discharge application constituted an alternate statutory remedy and should …

DADASAHEB S/O. KUSHABAPU PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Dadasaheb Pawar sought a court direction for the Dairy Development Officers and the Superintendent of Police to initiate criminal action against contractors (respondents 5‑7) based on a 2019 committee report that alleged irregularities. A later committee report dated 10‑Nov‑2022, accepted …

Sayli Wo Akshay PawarversusAkshay S/o Satish Pawar

DISMISSED

The wife, Sayli, filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Family Court at Pune. She sought transfer of the proceedings to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chalisgaon, citing the 300 km distance, financial constraints, lack of lodging, and the …

SHIVAJI GOVIND AAVULWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Shivaji Govind Aavulwad, filed a criminal application alleging suspicion that certain persons were involved in the murder of his father. The police recorded his statement, in which he admitted he only had suspicion and that the post‑mortem report concluded the death was due to a heart …

PRADIP KAKASAHEB SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Pradip Kakasaheb Sathe, was convicted by a Special Judge in 2025 for demanding a bribe under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He sought a stay of the conviction, arguing that the co‑accused who allegedly received the bribe had been acquitted, that he …

ANIL S/O. GANJIDHAR PAWARversusMADHAV VINAYAK KULKARNI AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Anil, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against respondents including Madhav Vinayak Kulkarni. The petitioner failed to appear in court on multiple dates (22-11-2018, 03-12-2025, and 10-12-2025) despite orders directing personal …

SHAIKH IRFAN S/O. SHAIKH PASHAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1722 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the Court issued a notice, the petitioner failed to circulate the matter or appear before the Court. The petitioner remained absent on the …

GANPATRAO YASHWANTRAO DESHMUKH DIED THR LRS 1A SAHEBRAO DIED THR LRS 1B SINDHUBAI DIED AND ORSversusPURUSHOTTAM SHRINIWAS JOSHI DIED THROUGH LRS 1/1 BHARATBAI DIED 1/2 PADMAKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The court considered a civil application (No. 11628 of 2026) filed to allow the legal representatives of a deceased appellant (No.1(a)) to be placed on the record in a long‑pending second appeal (No. 529 of 1992). The application sought permission for the appellants' counsel to file a vakalatnama on …

KUNDLIK KRUSHNA GHOBALE AND ANOTHERversusMINAKSHI NANDKISHOR KALE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Kundlik Krushna Ghobale and another, filed Writ Petition No. 13296 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondent Minakshi Nandkishor Kale. The petitioners argued that the regular civil suit No. 165 of 2015, which was the subject of the …

ICICI LOMBARD INSURANCE CO LTDversusGAULANBAI SIDDHARTH KOLTE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd filed an application seeking a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award in a civil suit. The applicant asserted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the court. The learned counsel for the applicant requested that the …

RAVI NAMDEORAO JADHAVversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ravi Namdeorao Jadhav, challenged an order dated 24 November 2022 that demoted him from Assistant Accountant Officer to Junior Accountant Officer. He argued that the order was passed without a prior show‑cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents …

GANGADHAR BHAURAO JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of land‑acquisition appeals. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and …

RAJENDRA RAGHUNAGH MAJKURIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajendra Raghunagh Majkuri, filed writ petition No. 4748 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mr. Syed Masood Chand, while the State was represented by Mr. A. V. …

FATRU ALIKHAN KHADAR ALIKHAN LASHKARI THROUGH LRS JULEKHABI FATRU ALI KHAN AND OTHERSversusISHRAT ALIKHAN KHADAR ALIKHAN LASHKARI THROUGH LRS KHAMRAMUNNISA ISHRAT ALI LASHKARI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a judgment dated 31‑08‑2019 in which a Junior Division Civil Judge set aside an ex‑parte decree in a partition suit (Civil Suit No.141/2002). They argued that the decree should not have been vacated because the application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC was filed 85 days …

DEVSING KIRTA VALVI AND OTHRSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The revision petitioners, five individuals present at the scene of a student’s death from electric shock, were later named in the chargesheet despite not being mentioned in the FIR. They sought discharge under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C., arguing lack of incriminating material and that they were …

MANDAKINI SANJAY SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Withdrawn

The applicants filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing both sides, the court expressed reluctance to grant relief. Consequently, the applicants' counsel requested withdrawal of the application. The court accepted the request and dismissed the …

PADMAKAR SADASHIV BAGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered an application (Criminal Application No.4070/2026) seeking suspension of the substantive sentence imposed on Padmakar, who had been convicted under Sections 279 and 337 of the IPC by the JMFC, Kaij (SCC No.102/2011) and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai …

SUNIL JAGANNATH KORDEversusBABABAI JAGANNATH KORDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Korde, filed a writ petition seeking relief. On instructions, his counsel, Mr. Nitin K. Chaudhari, applied to withdraw the petition. The Court, after considering the application, ordered that the writ petition stand disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, any pending …

BHARATI SAMBHAJI KARPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bharati Sambhaji Karpe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later moved a motion to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, applying procedural rules, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was …

SUDHAKAR S/O. TUKARAM SALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

Sudhakar filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1740 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court issued a notice to the respondents, but the petitioner remained continuously absent and failed to pursue the matter since 2019. The …

RAHUL S/O NARHARI SAWANT AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants, convicted under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC for assaulting a man named Santosh, appealed the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge who sentenced them to one month imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of eight witnesses, including …

GANGABAI PRALHADRAO JAMBLEversusKISHANRAO DHONDIRAM TAINAK AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Gangabai Pralhadrao Jamble filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of Kishanrao Dhondiram Tainak and others. While the petition was pending, a related Special Civil Suit No.58 of 2011, pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, …