DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Madhav Baba Billewad and Gangabai Baba Billewad filed separate writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies. While the petitioners were present in court, their counsel informed the bench that …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Swarnandini Tanaji Dabade and Nidhi Dhiraj Koli filed writ petitions seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide their claims of tribal status, which had been pending since May 2024 and September 2023 respectively. The petitions were limited to obtaining a timely decision on …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Madhav Baba Billewad and Gangabai Baba Billewad filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies. After filing, they approached the Court seeking to withdraw both petitions. The learned counsel for the …
DISPOSED OFF
Two writ petitions were filed by Swarnandini Tanaji Dabade and Nidhi Dhiraj Koli seeking a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide their pending tribe‑validity claims, which had been awaiting decision since May 2024 and September 2023 respectively. The petitions limited their prayer to an …
DISPOSED OFF
Manohar Govindrao Gajare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any appropriate remedy …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shree Swami Services, filed a writ petition and later, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after noting the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Madhusudan Babulal Bhartiya, challenged an order dated 17 July 2019 issued by the learned Arbitrator and District Collector, Aurangabad, which rejected his arbitration application concerning land acquired under the National Highways Authority. The respondent argued that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 11636/2022, 11654/2022, 11652/2022, 11651/2022, 11650/2022, 11649/2022, 11648/2022, 11645/2022, 11637/2022, 11643/2022) filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. All petitions sought relief …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Sanjay, was convicted by the JMFC and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under IPC sections 451 and 354, based on testimonies of four prosecution witnesses. He filed a criminal revision under Section 397 CrPC challenging both the conviction and the sentence, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 11636/2022, 11654/2022, 11652/2022, 11651/2022, 11650/2022, 11649/2022, 11648/2022, 11645/2022, 11637/2022, 11643/2022) before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Over the course of the …
DISPOSED OFF
Several writ petitions (Nos. 11636/2022, 11654/2022, 11652/2022, 11651/2022, 11650/2022, 11649/2022, 11648/2022, 11645/2022, 11637/2022, 11643/2022) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through counsel, sought relief but did not advance the matters for …
DISPOSED OFF
Baban Murlidhar Patunkar filed a writ petition challenging an order dated page 150. The petitioner claimed a grievance concerning a writ property. While the petition was pending, a related civil suit was decided in the petitioner's favour, thereby redressing his grievance. The Court held that the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Applicants 7 and 8, distant relatives of the complainant, filed an application seeking quashment of FIR No. 256/2023 that alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and 34 for dowry harassment and physical assault. The FIR was lodged by Shila, wife of Vinayak, claiming that the …
DISMISSED
Jamir Wajir Shaikh filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1456 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking an adjournment on the ground of the unavailability of Ms. Sunita Sonawane. The petitioner’s counsel alleged that the adjournment was necessary, but the court noted that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondent's Scrutiny Committee had not decided his tribe claim within the time prescribed by a prior High Court order. The Court heard the matter and the respondent’s Additional Government Pleader, on instruction, undertook that the pending …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Manoj Routre was convicted by a Special/Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case for rape under Section 376(2)(l) of the IPC, based on DNA evidence and the prosecution’s claim that the victim was mentally challenged. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of his sentence and bail, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Madhukar Tukaram Pandit, filed a writ petition challenging the Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation. After arguing, the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition and to make a comprehensive representation to the corporation. The Court, after hearing, granted leave to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who are contractual ambulance drivers, sought two reliefs: (i) to be placed on the minimum pay scale of the lowest grade regular employees, and (ii) protection against termination of their contractual services. The State opposed the second relief, arguing that many petitioners had …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners, Babumiya Ahmedsab Shaikh and others, filed a criminal application seeking to bring the legal heirs of respondent No.2 (the informant) on record in a pending criminal revision. The court considered the procedural propriety of allowing the legal heirs to be added to the revision …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners Kaushalyabai Tukaram Chavan and Ramprasad Appasaheb Kakade filed civil applications before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of delays of 2,676 and 1,152 days respectively in filing their appeals. The court examined the explanations provided for the delays and found them …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed several writ petitions and civil applications challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates. The Court observed that the matters raised are identical to those already decided in Writ Petition …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, represented by Advocate Ramesh V. Naiknaware, moved the court to correct the minutes of an order dated 22 September 2026, alleging that First Appeal numbers 2819, 2820 and 2818 of 2016 were incorrectly listed. The court examined whether it could amend its own order to delete the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a writ petition challenging the Aurangabad Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's order that allowed Kantabai Divekar to amend her compensation claim for her husband's accidental death. The amendment sought to correct the offending vehicle's …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Trimbak Ananda Dafal, filed a contempt petition (No. 160 of 2020) arising out of Writ Petition No. 7293 of 2019, alleging non-compliance with a contempt order. The petitioner was represented by Mr. P.B. Salunke, appearing on behalf of Mr. V.G. Salgare. The respondent State of …
DISPOSED OFF
Shakuntala Baban Garje filed a writ petition (No. 11065 of 2016) against Grampanchayat Nahuli and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, because of the passage of time, no cause of action remained and the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment and award dated 26 March 2009 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, concerning land acquired for the Terna Medium Project at Makni. The respondent, Bhamabai Laxman Jadhav, had claimed compensation for the acquired land. The High Court noted that it …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Kiran Vasantrao Ture, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Divisional Commissioner to register and decide his appeal against a committee order that invalidated his claim of belonging to the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. The petition relied on the newly enacted …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, all holders of M.Phil degrees and recipients of fellowships from BARTI or BANRF, filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a direction for the university to admit them to its Ph.D programme without undergoing the prescribed Ph.D Entrance Test (PET). They relied on a UGC …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, all SC‑category candidates holding M.Phil degrees and fellowships from BARTI or BANRF, filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a direction to the university to constitute a Research Recommendation Committee and to grant them admission to the Ph.D programme without undergoing …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The State of Maharashtra filed a criminal appeal against Mahendra Sitram Barela. The appeal was filed 86 days after the prescribed period, prompting a petition for condonation of delay. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused under procedural law. It held that the 86‑day delay was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a series of civil applications filed by the claimants seeking to have the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased claimant placed on record in the appeals filed by the State. The court noted that the names of the applicants had already …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their appeals against the State of Maharashtra. Both sides were heard, and the court noted that similar delays had been condoned in related appeals. Relying on the reasons set out in the applications, the court allowed the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants, legal heirs of the deceased Parvatabai Kusa Gudnar, filed multiple civil applications seeking to be formally recorded as parties in appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra. The State had already listed the heirs as representatives in its own appeals, but the claimants sought a …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered bail applications filed by Nitin Bapurao Mohite and Radhesham Panjabrao Bhalerao, accused in a kidnapping‑ransom case registered as Crime No.597 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that abducted an elderly man and demanded a Rs 1 crore …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The petitioners filed two civil applications seeking condonation of delay in bringing the legal representatives of deceased parties on record—one for a delay of 3,994 days and another for 413 days. Both applications were heard, and the Court examined whether the delays were deliberate. Relying on …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Rajendra Dilipsingh Tehra, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent State of Maharashtra filed a 'B Summary' report, which, according to the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, rendered the pending application infructuous. On this …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants filed multiple civil applications seeking to bring on record the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased claimant. The State had already listed these heirs in its own appeals, raising the question of whether the claimants could amend the record to include them. The Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their appeals against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court examined the reasons for the delay and noted that similar delays had been condoned in related appeals. The Court allowed the applications for condonation of delay …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased parties on record. The first application sought condonation of a 3,994‑day delay, and the second sought condonation of a …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench allowed the civil application filed by Govindrao Ramrao Korde and others, granting relief under prayer clause B. The court directed that the amendment to the application be effected within two weeks and that a copy be served on the respondents. It ordered …
DISPOSED OFF
Shabana Shaikh Yunus filed writ petition No. 13565 of 2019 in the High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad bench, against Abdul Hamid Abdul Gafur and another seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the cause of action had become infructuous. The court noted this submission and …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Ratnamala Pralhad Salve filed a writ petition seeking an appointment as Anganwadi Sevika, invoking two government resolutions dated 12 March 2008 and 13 August 2014. The petitioner asked the court to direct the respondent authority to decide her claim and issue an appointment order. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Manikchand Madanlal Gangwal filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gevrai, which had rejected his application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC in suit No. 927 of 2021. The petitioner argued that the order …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court held that the State and the Maharashtra State Council of …
DISPOSED OFF
A large number of writ petitions and associated civil applications were listed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The petitioners sought transfer of all these matters to the Principal Seat of the Court, invoking a Supreme Court judgment (Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, Balaji Maroti Banbare, challenged the award dated 13 June 2019 of the Reference Court in L.A.R. No. 225/2012, seeking full compensation for his house property acquired for the Lendi project. The Reference Court had granted only a 40% enhancement over the basic award, rejecting the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Subhash Tukappa Hirmukhe and others, filed a writ petition (No. 7512 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought reliefs specified in prayer clauses B and C, but the filing was delayed. The respondents …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant challenged a 2019 award that enhanced compensation for a house acquired for the Lendi project only by 40% of the private valuer's assessment. The private valuer’s report valued the property at Rs. 2,76,356, but the Reference Court had granted only Rs. 34,930 in addition to the original …
DISPOSED OFF
Vinod Premchand Surana filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a farmer, challenged the dismissal of his land acquisition reference (L.A.R. No.05 of 2015) by the Civil Judge, who had set aside the reference because the petitioner failed to appear or present evidence. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the judgment and award …
DISPOSED OFF
Golden Dreams Buildcon Pvt Ltd, through its director, challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment …
DISPOSED OFF
Golden Dreams Buildcon Pvt Ltd challenged a notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., held that after the faceless reassessment scheme came into …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vikas Eknath Bhagwat, filed a writ petition (No. 3469 of 2017) arising out of H.M.P. No.65 of 2016. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be entertained despite the earlier proceedings. The court examined the status of H.M.P. No.65 of 2016 and found that it had …
DISPOSED OFF
Krishana filed an application seeking cancellation of bail (No. 150 of 2019) in a criminal case. Respondent No.3, appearing via video conference, informed the court that the substantive case had already been decided and there was no pending issue. The court, noting the submission that the matter was …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Wasim Khan, filed a criminal application (No. 3133 of 2018) and a revision (Rev. No. 315/2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. He argued that the trial court had already disposed of the main criminal matter during the pendency of these applications. He contended that …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a 2019 award by the Reference Court that granted compensation of Rs 68,928 with only a 40% enhancement for their house acquired for the Lendi project, arguing that the court should have accepted the private valuer’s report of Rs 2,29,916 in full. The respondents contended …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Tushar Murlidhar Baviskar filed a writ petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra failed to decide his tribe claims by the deadline of 22‑09‑2025 as ordered. The State’s Advocate General acknowledged the delay, citing subsequent events that prevented the orders, and promised that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prabhawati Babasaheb Kombde, received a show‑cause notice from the Deputy Conservator of Forest demanding a Scheduled Tribe (ST) caste certificate, as she had been appointed to a post reserved for ST candidates. Fearing that failure to produce the certificate would lead to adverse …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, seeking just compensation for acquired land, filed an application to condone a delay of 2,613 days in filing an appeal against a 2018 judgment. The court examined the reasons for the delay, noting that the applicants had explained the circumstances in their application. It held that …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of a large group of writ petitions (904‑931) that raised the entitlement of medical officers to engage in private practice and to receive a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that it had already decided the matter in a common judgment dated 30 …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Jagannth Trimbak Marke, filed a first appeal (No. 3039 of 2013) against the order in Civil Application No. 15368 of 2013. During the hearing, the appellant, through counsel, expressed a desire to discontinue prosecution of the appeal and sought the court's permission to withdraw it. …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Jagannath Trimbak Marke, filed a first appeal but later instructed his counsel to withdraw the appeal. The appellant’s counsel, Mr. Kalyan Patil, communicated this request to the court. The learned Judge, Rohit W. Joshi, allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Superintending Engineer MSEDCL Latur, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Latur dated 04‑04‑2016 which allowed a complaint filed by the respondent, Prabhakar Rangnath Awade, and directed payment of salary for his suspension period (02‑04‑2004 to 18‑05‑2006). The respondent …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appeal challenges a 2014 award of compensation in a land acquisition case. The appellant argued that the dispute is identical to matters previously decided by this Court in First Appeal No.67 of 1997 and First Appeal No.1264 of 2017. Both the State and the acquiring authority accepted this view. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a series of civil applications seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, permission to withdraw half of the amount deposited with the court, and condonation of a 133‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court first allowed the stay application as per prayer clause …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a series of civil applications seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, permission to withdraw half of the amount deposited with the court, and condonation of a 133‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court first allowed the stay application as per prayer clause …
DISPOSED OFF
The Latour City Municipal Corporation filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 25‑02‑2022 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) Nos. 69 and 70 of 2021. The High Court observed that the substantive industrial‑court proceedings were still pending and therefore declined to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a motion seeking correction of the minutes of an order dated 28 April 2026, alleging errors in the case number, party names, and the operative clause regarding withdrawal of deposited amount. The respondent agreed that Clause 2 of the operative part should be deleted. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Banabai Bajrang Rajput filed a contempt petition seeking enforcement of a direction dated 21 November 2011 and 2 December 2011 for payment of rental compensation. The State, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the applications had already been decided and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 735 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, on 13 August 2026, the petitioner issued a written instruction indicating a desire to discontinue the proceedings. The court recorded this instruction and, after considering the withdrawal, …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Maharashtra Krushna Valley Development Corporation (the acquiring body) appealed against a judgment and award dated 17 June 2013 that enhanced compensation for land acquired for a storage tank project in Wadgaon (Dev.), Osmanabad. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially valued the …
DISMISSED
Prakash Baburao Kaduskar appealed for bail and suspension of a 20‑year sentence imposed for offences under Sections 354, 376(2)(i)(j)(n), 376(3), 506 of the IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was delayed, the victim was almost 16 and had a consensual …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant failed to appear before the High Court on two consecutive dates despite a clear warning that non‑appearance would be taken as lack of interest. The Court reiterated that if no one appeared for the applicant on the next date, it would presume the applicant was not interested in …
DISPOSED OFF
Shraddha Rajendra Mokase filed several writ petitions (Nos. 11911/2025, 12201/2024, 12896/2024, 14090/2024, 10487/2024, 11117/2024, 11972/2025) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on the scheduled dates. The bench observed that …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
In a criminal appeal (No. 804 of 2026) filed by Ulhas Ranjit Deshmukh against the State of Maharashtra, the High Court at Aurangabad addressed procedural matters. The court issued a notice to the State, directing that it be returned by 15 October 2026. The appellant, through counsel, waived service …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Ulhas Ranjit Deshmukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhoom, for an offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three months' imprisonment. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the hearing of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Amit Chate, filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, which was decided by the M.A.C.T., Beed on 20 February 2016. They sought to appeal the tribunal's judgment but filed the appeal 159 days late, and therefore filed a …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Sunil Parbhatrao Chaudhari filed an application seeking to fix Application for Leave to Appeal (ALS) No.143 of 2022 for final hearing. The applicant argued that the reasons stated in the application warranted scheduling the appeal. The High Court examined the content of the application and found the …
DISPOSED OFF
Sikandar Ekbal Patel filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1726 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The Court, after hearing counsel for both parties, expressed a disinclination to grant any relief. On the instructions of the applicant, …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court considered an application by Suraj Sardarsingh Chavhan, convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape, seeking suspension of his sentence and bail pending appeal. The applicant argued that the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor, citing the absence of a birth certificate and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimant sought to withdraw a portion of compensation deposited by the State Government in the reference court, relying on a prior order in the same matter. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% of the amount upon an undertaking and 25% upon furnishing a solvent security, with the remaining 25% to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimant sought to withdraw a portion of compensation deposited by the State Government in the reference court, relying on a prior order in Mahadev Kisan Waikar v. State of Maharashtra. The court allowed withdrawal of 50% upon an undertaking and 25% upon furnishing solvent security, with the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Dhanaji Ganpat Khomane filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his suit for default by the Trial Court. The petitioner had also filed an application (Civil M.A. No.943/2025) seeking restoration of the suit before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Beed. The respondent argued …
DISPOSED OFF
The petition arose from an order of the Tahsildar, Rahuri, confirming the existence of a 2‑3 foot customary pathway on the boundary of Gats 224 and 225 and directing the removal of an obstruction allegedly caused by the petitioners. The petitioners contended that the panchnama produced under Section …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners sought approval of their services, which was rejected by the State of Maharashtra on 16 May 2023 on the ground of a management dispute and pending submission of Schedule‑I. The petitioners later produced an order dated 27 May 2025 from the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Beed, …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition seeking direction to grant benefits to 52 daily‑wage labourers employed under the Agriculture Department. The State’s affidavit‑in‑reply asserted that all labourers had been paid the applicable minimum wages and that only 11 of them, who had worked at …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Sanatkumaar Bhalchandra Jain, filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw Rs.3,00,000 that had been deposited by the respondent, Prashant Bhagwansingh Kachwah, as security following the suspension of the respondent's sentence. The amount was already in the court …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Chavalibai Mulchand Rathod, appealed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhanced compensation for fruit‑bearing trees on land acquired for the Minor Irrigation Tank Londhari Project. The reference court had determined compensation for the land but rejected the …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered bail applications filed by Nitin Bapurao Mohite and Radhesham Panjabrao Bhalerao, accused in a kidnapping‑ransom case registered as Crime No.597 of 2024. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a gang that abducted an elderly man …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Shailesh Sambhrao Borlepwar, filed a criminal application seeking permission to withdraw the application and to raise all grounds before the trial court, noting that charges had already been framed and two witnesses examined. The respondent State of Maharashtra opposed the request. …
DISPOSED OFF
Ganesh Maruti Yemulvad filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing a review application against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant argued that there was no contest to the averments in the application and that condonation was appropriate. The respondents did not …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Nagesh Ramdas Gulewad, challenged his removal from the office of Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Ijali under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The removal was effected after the election held in 2020‑2021, and the petitioner argued that the removal was …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of thousands of candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court upheld the cancellation of the 2018 and 2019 Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for thousands of candidates after finding that mark‑sheets had been tampered with. It held that the Commissioner of the Maharashtra State Council of Examinations had the statutory authority to …
DISPOSED OFF
Iqbal Babar Sayyad filed a writ petition against Classic Fire Works and its proprietors. The respondents argued that the petition became infructuous because the Insurance Company had filed First Appeal No. 627 of 2024, which was admitted by the Court on 4 August 2025. The petitioner objected to this …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) had deposited Rs.1,18,70,800 as directed by the Court, but only 70% of that amount was to be released to the claimants upon furnishing an undertaking, with the balance contingent on a solvent surety. The Acquiring Body filed a civil application seeking …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) deposited Rs.1,18,70,800/- as directed by the Bombay High Court and sought to withdraw the amount. The Court noted that the Respondent, Radhabai Prabhulal Jaiswal, had only deposited 70% of the amount as per earlier orders, and the Court’s established …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a common order dated 21.08.2023 in which the trial court allowed a second application for a fresh Court Commissioner report in a boundary dispute suit (RCS No.237/2015). They argued that once an earlier application had been allowed and a report submitted, the court should …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,966‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award rendered by a learned Reference Court. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard arguments from both parties. The court examined the reasons for the delay as set …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, legal heirs of the deceased sole claimant Madhukar Shripat Gadhve, sought condonation of a 1,228‑day delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing the heirs on record. The court examined whether the cause of action survived against the heirs and whether the delay was …
DISMISSED
Bhausaheb Kashinath Kadnar filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1674 of 2022 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to remove office objections and did not obtain the required circulation after filing the petition. The court observed that this indicated a lack of interest in …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Shakil Md. Mushir Bagwan and another, filed a writ petition (WP/8237/2024) against the State of Maharashtra. On 18 March 2026, the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard the matter. The petitioners subsequently filed a civil application seeking amendment of their pleadings. The …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Rasik Shanitlal Kothari, filed a criminal writ petition challenging Crime No. 311/2015 of Jawaharnagar Police Station. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the underlying criminal case had already been quashed on compromise in Criminal Application No. 184 of 2022. …
DISPOSED OFF
Sharad Kisan Bhumbar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, finding no impediment, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Ex. Engineer NMC Aurangabad (applicant) filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals, withdrawal of a monetary amount, and a stay of proceedings against the respondents, including a minor under guardianship. The court examined the explanations provided for the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Suresh Bansi Labade and another, filed a writ petition asserting ownership of a property based on a registered sale deed dated 31.01.1989 and a registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the court's order dated 04.03.2026 …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sakshi Balaji Chilkar, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later applied to withdraw the petition, requesting permission to continue a related representation or application pending before another respondent. The respondent State …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, accused Nos.1, 6 and 7, were convicted by the trial court and the conviction upheld by the appellate court for assault under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They filed a criminal revision alleging that the prosecution’s evidence was insufficient, …
DISPOSED OFF
Vijay Alias Laddya Sarjerao Kulkarni filed a bail application (Criminal Application No. 3954 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, after hearing the applicant's counsel, indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. On the instructions of the applicant, counsel sought …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The case involved multiple first appeals and cross‑objections arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Urdhva Pravara Project in villages Mehenduri and Bahirwadi, where claimants sought higher compensation and the acquiring body contested interest. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd filed a civil application seeking a stay of proceedings. The applicant’s counsel submitted that, following the court’s order dated 24‑12‑2025, the entire amount directed by the court had been deposited. The court considered the submission and, finding no …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of first appeals and cross‑objections arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Urdhva Pravara Project canals in Ahmednagar district. Claimants sought further enhancement of the market value of their lands beyond the awards of the Reference Court, while …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, a 66‑year‑old retired bank employee, sought cancellation of a non‑bailable warrant issued after he failed to pay the full Rs.5,00,000 conditionally required for suspension of his sentence. The High Court noted that while the applicant had paid Rs.2,43,000, he had not deposited the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shantaram Tryabak Apar, filed a continuous petition (No. 893 of 2025) seeking relief from the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court had previously directed that a certain amount be paid to the petitioner. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Badribishan A. Darak, informed …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of the investigation of Crime No. 213 of 2022, originally registered with the City Police Station, Jalgaon. The Court examined the Resource Personnel report and found that a Sessions case (No. 104 of 2024) concerning the same offence …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Santosh Govindrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the case, the sole petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court of the death, raising the question of the petition’s continuance. The Court …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of first appeals and cross‑objections arising from land acquisition awards for the Urdhva Pravara Project canals in villages Mehenduri and Bahirwadi. Claimants sought further enhancement of the market value of the acquired lands, while the acquiring body …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, as the acquiring authority, sought to acquire land in Arvi village for the expansion of a broad‑gauge railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.127 per square metre, which the reference court enhanced to Rs.70 per square foot. The original …
DISPOSED OFF
The respondents filed a civil suit for declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction against the petitioner. After a temporary injunction was rejected, the plaintiffs sought to withdraw the suit and were granted liberty by the trial court to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action, with …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Avinash alias Batlya Sahebrao Ingole, aged 23, was arrested on 16‑12‑2021 in connection with a murder and related offences under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. After more than four years of pre‑trial detention, he applied for regular bail, claiming …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The GMIDC and the Executive Engineer, Latur filed appeals against a reference court award that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank. The land was taken under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 1996, with possession taken in 1994 through …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Gujarat Minor Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) appealed the award of compensation granted to the original claimants whose lands were acquired for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The reference court had enhanced the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,966‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award rendered by a learned Reference Court. The primary issue before the court was whether such a lengthy delay could be condoned under the principles of natural justice and …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer filed a writ petition challenging a 06‑10‑2023 order of the CJSD, Paranda that issued a warrant against the judgment debtor. The petitioner had deposited the entire award amount except for interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the interest component …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Shailesh Gaikwad and Somnath Dale, both labourers, filed an anticipatory bail application after a charge sheet was filed against them. The court had earlier directed them to attend the police station, which they complied with. The State and the victim opposed the application, but the court found no …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Santosh Damodhar Aragade, appealed against his conviction under Sections 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly pulling down a revenue officer who was on duty, causing injury. The prosecution presented the complainant’s testimony supported by two independent eyewitnesses …
DISMISSED
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that ordered it to pay compensation to a passenger who suffered 100% permanent disability in a head‑on collision involving an auto‑rickshaw. The insurer contended that the policy (Exh.37) was an “act only” policy …
DISPOSED OFF
The husband filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order that granted monthly maintenance of Rs.3,000 to his wife and Rs.1,000 each to two children, effective from the petition filing date of 3 April 2018. The revision application, filed after a delay, was condoned by the High Court. …
DISMISSED
The applicants, Shahu S/o Dagadu Kamble and others, filed a criminal application (No. 3490 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The record showed that on three prior occasions, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ramchandra Madhavrao Mundhe, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of this petition, the related regular civil suit (No. 121 of 2022) was disposed of by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mukhed. The petitioner submitted …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of first appeals and cross‑objections arising from land acquisition proceedings for the Urdhva Pravara Project canals in Ahmednagar district. Claimants sought a further increase in the market value of the acquired lands beyond the awards of the Reference Court, …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent Gram Rojgar Sevaks. The Court noted that the petitioners were appointed only on a temporary scheme and had not been appointed to a …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ramrao Devidas Mundhe and Janardhan Digambar Kalure, who had been employed on a temporary Gram Rojgar Sevak scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a court direction that the State of Maharashtra absorb them as permanent employees. The High Court examined whether a temporary appointment …
Transfer to other court
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions pending before it in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Manik Harichandra Phad, had been issued an arms licence on 20 June 2024, which was later revoked by the District Magistrate of Beed under Section 17 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner challenged the revocation, contending that he was not served a show‑cause notice nor given …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the civil court's refusal to appoint a commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC for a 2014 suit seeking perpetual injunction. They alleged that the suit was stayed and sought a stay of the suit proceedings, claiming prejudice to the defendant. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, owners of agricultural land Gut No.159 in Nanded, were sued by neighboring landowners (respondents) who claimed a pre‑existing usage pathway (Wahivat Rasta) through their land and sought its clearance under Sections 4 and 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906. A panchnama was taken …
DISPOSED OFF
A writ petition (No. 12234 of 2018) was filed by Shyamrao Pandurang Chavan and others against the Union of India. The Court had issued a specific order on 30 July 2026 directing the petitioners to appear. On 10 September 2026, the petitioners failed to appear despite the order. No counsel was …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a series of writ petitions filed by various educational institutions and individuals against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitions raised procedural objections termed as "office objections" that were pending before the court. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The Dnyan Sandeep Shikshan Sanstha, representing teachers and management, filed writ petitions against the Education Officer (Primary) of Z.P. Aurangabad and against Omprakash Sanjabrao Sawadatkar, alleging disputes related to their employment and administration. A third petition was filed by the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Fareddan Baba Farzen Aredeshir Dordi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain orders. The respondents, including Nasima Begum Masood Khan and others, contested the petition. During the proceedings, both parties agreed that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sanvar Baig Shabbir Baig, filed Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel D. K. Dagadkhair, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …
DISPOSED OFF
Premilabai Pralhadrao Pattewar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing the Court expressed disinclination to issue a notice. The petitioner's counsel then sought leave to withdraw the petition and to pursue appropriate civil proceedings. The Bench …
Withdrawn
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the counsel for the applicants sought permission to withdraw the pending application and to file a fresh one. The respondent State opposed the request. The Court examined …
DISPOSED OFF
A group of candidates filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a court order directing Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University to constitute a Research Recommendation Committee and admit them to its Ph.D. programme without undergoing the prescribed Ph.D. Entrance Test (PET). The …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Sunil Dhuda Chitte and others, filed a criminal application seeking relief, but they had already filed an application for discharge in the trial court, which remained pending. The State argued that the pending discharge application constituted an alternate statutory remedy and should …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, all holders of M.Phil degrees and recipients of fellowships from BARTI or BANRF, filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a court order directing Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University to admit them to its Ph.D programme without undergoing the prescribed Ph.D Entrance …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Dadasaheb Pawar sought a court direction for the Dairy Development Officers and the Superintendent of Police to initiate criminal action against contractors (respondents 5‑7) based on a 2019 committee report that alleged irregularities. A later committee report dated 10‑Nov‑2022, accepted …
DISMISSED
The wife, Sayli, filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Family Court at Pune. She sought transfer of the proceedings to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chalisgaon, citing the 300 km distance, financial constraints, lack of lodging, and the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Arjun Bhimrao Mandve, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition (WP No. 10804 of 2022) and to file a fresh petition challenging the same orders. The learned senior counsel, Rajendra Deshmukh, appeared on behalf of the petitioner and requested the court's leave to withdraw. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ahmednagar Jilha Prathamik Shikshan Sahakari Bank Ltd (through its director), challenged the order dated 12 September 2018 of the Divisional Joint Registrar Co‑Societies, Nashik, which dismissed its revision of an inquiry conducted under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Shivaji Govind Aavulwad, filed a criminal application alleging suspicion that certain persons were involved in the murder of his father. The police recorded his statement, in which he admitted he only had suspicion and that the post‑mortem report concluded the death was due to a heart …
DISMISSED
The wife, Shital Mangesh Ahire, filed an application seeking transfer of the Hindu Marriage Petition No. 93 of 2025, originally pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division in Malegaon, to the Family Court in Aurangabad. She argued that the 160 km distance, her responsibility for two minor …
DISPOSED OFF
Sunny Dharmvir Bidla filed a writ petition (No. 13343 of 2022) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was heard before a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. After hearing on merits, the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant the relief …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Pradip Kakasaheb Sathe, was convicted by a Special Judge in 2025 for demanding a bribe under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. He sought a stay of the conviction, arguing that the co‑accused who allegedly received the bribe had been acquitted, that he …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shaikh Jabbar Razzak, filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary arrears, having submitted a proposal to the Education Officer in 2018. The Education Officer identified deficiencies in the proposal and issued an order on 16 July 2024. The petitioner subsequently rectified these …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) results for the 2018 and 2019 examinations and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates alleged to have been involved in mark‑sheet …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
DISMISSED
The petitioner, Anil, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against respondents including Madhav Vinayak Kulkarni. The petitioner failed to appear in court on multiple dates (22-11-2018, 03-12-2025, and 10-12-2025) despite orders directing personal …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of around 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory …
DISMISSED
The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1722 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After the Court issued a notice, the petitioner failed to circulate the matter or appear before the Court. The petitioner remained absent on the …
DISPOSED OFF
The court considered a civil application (No. 11628 of 2026) filed to allow the legal representatives of a deceased appellant (No.1(a)) to be placed on the record in a long‑pending second appeal (No. 529 of 1992). The application sought permission for the appellants' counsel to file a vakalatnama on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Kundlik Krushna Ghobale and another, filed Writ Petition No. 13296 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondent Minakshi Nandkishor Kale. The petitioners argued that the regular civil suit No. 165 of 2015, which was the subject of the …
Transfer to other court
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions pending before it in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd filed an application seeking a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award in a civil suit. The applicant asserted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the court. The learned counsel for the applicant requested that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ravi Namdeorao Jadhav, challenged an order dated 24 November 2022 that demoted him from Assistant Accountant Officer to Junior Accountant Officer. He argued that the order was passed without a prior show‑cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The State opposed the applications, but the court found no malafide intent and held that the delay was not intentional. The court conditioned condonation on …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Piraji Bhimrao More and Jagan Vitthalrao Khavne, filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,221‑day delay in filing appeals related to claims for just compensation for acquired land. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Jalna, opposed the …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of land‑acquisition appeals. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The State opposed the applications, but the court found no malafide intent and held that the delay was not intentional. The court conditioned condonation on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajendra Raghunagh Majkuri, filed writ petition No. 4748 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mr. Syed Masood Chand, while the State was represented by Mr. A. V. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government Resolution dated 07‑08‑2012. The High Court observed that it had already examined those clauses in Writ Petition No. 6549/2026 and had held them to be valid. Accordingly, the present writ petition was found to be covered …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, EKLAVYA JAL KSHETRIYA BHOI MATSYA VYAVSAIK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, challenged an order that allotted a fish tank to the respondents for a period of five years, which expired in 2015. The petition, filed in 2014, sought relief despite the expiry of the allotment period. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a judgment dated 31‑08‑2019 in which a Junior Division Civil Judge set aside an ex‑parte decree in a partition suit (Civil Suit No.141/2002). They argued that the decree should not have been vacated because the application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC was filed 85 days …
DISPOSED OFF
The revision petitioners, five individuals present at the scene of a student’s death from electric shock, were later named in the chargesheet despite not being mentioned in the FIR. They sought discharge under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C., arguing lack of incriminating material and that they were …
Withdrawn
The applicants filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing both sides, the court expressed reluctance to grant relief. Consequently, the applicants' counsel requested withdrawal of the application. The court accepted the request and dismissed the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The High Court considered an application (Criminal Application No.4070/2026) seeking suspension of the substantive sentence imposed on Padmakar, who had been convicted under Sections 279 and 337 of the IPC by the JMFC, Kaij (SCC No.102/2011) and affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, Shanta Premkumarji Loya, appealed against the award of compensation for 2 R of land acquired for a JNNURM housing scheme, contending that the valuation and the 70% deduction for development charges were excessive. The trial court had fixed the land value at Rs 2,25,000 per R but …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sayyad Sattar Sayyad Abbas (deceased) through his legal representatives, filed a civil application seeking relief under prayer clause B against the State of Maharashtra. The application alleged certain grounds (not detailed in the judgment) and requested the Court to permit a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Trimbak Mahadev Markad and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 June 2022 issued by the State of Maharashtra. The challenge was premised on Clause‑3 of a Government Resolution dated 13 October 2016, which the petitioners alleged to be discriminatory and …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Raghapur village, Beed district, for a new railway line and paid a compensation rate of Rs 1,200 per R. The civil court enhanced the rate to Rs 2,065 per R for Jirayat land and Rs 2,900 per R for seasonally irrigated land. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sunil Jagannath Korde, filed a writ petition seeking relief. On instructions, his counsel, Mr. Nitin K. Chaudhari, applied to withdraw the petition. The Court, after considering the application, ordered that the writ petition stand disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, any pending …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Bharati Sambhaji Karpe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later moved a motion to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, applying procedural rules, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition proceedings. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused and under what conditions. It held that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, two assistant professors, challenged the refusal of the Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University registrar to grant them benefits under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS), alleging procedural irregularities in the committee that evaluated their proposals. The university rejected …
DISPOSED OFF
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), through its Project Director, deposited an amount equal to 50% of the excess compensation as determined by an arbitrator in a land acquisition dispute. The court, by order dated 06.03.2026, allowed the landowner respondents to withdraw this deposited …
DISPOSED OFF
The Gram Panchayat Usmanpur filed writ petition No. 13303 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on 06.01.2026, and despite the court’s adjournment to the afternoon …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the continuation of proceedings in suit R.C.S. No.173/2007. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the suit had already been disposed of, leaving no operative relief to be claimed. The respondent's counsel was present but made no substantive …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 64‑day delay in filing an appeal. The respondents did not object to the condonation, and two of the respondents were absent despite being served. The court considered the lack of objection and …
DISMISSED
Sudhakar filed a criminal writ petition (No. 1740 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court issued a notice to the respondents, but the petitioner remained continuously absent and failed to pursue the matter since 2019. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, convicted under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC for assaulting a man named Santosh, appealed the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge who sentenced them to one month imprisonment and a fine. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of eight witnesses, including …
DISPOSED OFF
Gangabai Pralhadrao Jamble filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of Kishanrao Dhondiram Tainak and others. While the petition was pending, a related Special Civil Suit No.58 of 2011, pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, …