DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shivprasad Dipak Birajdar, filed writ petition No. 1625 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner had earlier submitted a representation dated 15 June 2023, which apparently had not been adjudicated. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for assaulting and verbally abusing a scheduled‑caste woman in public view. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that key witness statements were …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications (Nos. 13422, 13412, 13419, 13416, 13425 of 2024) against various respondents. These applications were pending because the corresponding first appeals (Nos. 668, 615, 666, 616, 667 of 2026) …
DISMISSED
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications and first appeals against various respondents. The High Court disposed of the first appeals, and the judge held that the pending civil applications could not survive the disposal of those …
DISPOSED OFF
The writ petition (34 WRIT PETITION NO. 14176 OF 2019) was filed by Chandkjhan Imamkhan Pathan against Sanjay Vishwanath Shevale and another. The petition arose from an order dated 19 August 2019 in Regular Civil Suit No.69/2016, which had been dismissed for want of evidence and prosecution. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court considered two civil applications filed after a delay of 2,799 days, seeking condonation of that delay, setting aside the abatement of proceedings, and permission to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellants, Deorao Shankarrao Bhise and Subhadrabai Shankarrao Bhise, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court considered two civil applications filed after a delay of 2,799 days, seeking to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellants, Deorao Shankarrao Bhise and Subhadrabai Shankarrao Bhise, on record and to set aside the abatement of the proceedings. The Court examined the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, who are bank employees, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 436/2025 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation of funds in a real‑estate partnership dispute. The informant, a partner in the disputed …
Withdrawn
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two bail applications filed by Sail Pandurang Bansode and Anwar Shaha Mohammad Shaha against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after detailed hearing, expressed that it was not inclined to grant bail to either applicant. On the instructions of the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants' land was acquired for the Lower Terna Right Canal, with possession taken in 1998 before the Section 4 notification in December 1999. The Civil Judge awarded compensation at Rs 1,050 per R treating the land as dry, while the claimants sought Rs 1,45,303 alleging the land was …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Bhanudas Shamrao Hiwarale, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dismissing his 2015 complaint on the ground that a separate factory‑level agreement, which he failed to produce, was required for locus standi. The High Court examined whether the Industrial …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Special Lok Adalat of the High Court at Aurangabad heard an application by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. seeking to withdraw its first appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Osmanabad. The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal and formally registered it before …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, teachers employed by a school managed by respondent No.3, alleged harassment, salary stoppage and illegal termination after a dispute over the appointment of a headmaster. They repeatedly approached the Education Officer and Deputy Director of Education, who directed the school to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Suresh Shrihari Kawade, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09 June 2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kalam, Osmanabad, which recorded a compromise filed as Exhibit‑55 and led to the disposal of the underlying suit. The petitioner contended that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sonali Shivdas Borase, filed a writ petition seeking a decision on a proposal dated 31 July 2017. The High Court examined whether the respondent authority (No.3) was required to consider the proposal on its merits, taking into account prevailing government policies, resolutions, …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Abed S/o. Kasam Pathan and others, filed a criminal application and subsequently sought leave to amend it after the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet. The learned advocate for the applicants requested the court's permission to make the amendment. The principal issue before …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vitthal Baburao Shelke, filed an application under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, seeking cancellation of a compromise decree that had transferred his residential property to his son, the respondent. The Sub‑Divisional Officer …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed three contempt petitions seeking transfer for the academic year 2025‑26. Respondent states that the petitions are infructuous as the transfer period has elapsed. Petitioners acknowledged this but requested liberty to file fresh transfer applications for the next academic year. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Sakharm Munjaji Dudhate and another, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment dated 28 June 2018 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge, Parbhani in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.20/2017. The petitioners argued that the substantive dispute had already been finally decided in …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prakash Narayan Dahale, filed a writ petition (No. 13112 of 2024) challenging a suspension order dated 2 January 2024 issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief against the suspension, alleging its illegality. During the proceedings, the respondent submitted a …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard three contempt petitions filed by Vivekanand So Bhagwan Kamble, Mohan So Kisan Wagalgave, and Mustafa So Fattusab Shaikh against the State of Maharashtra concerning their requests for academic transfers for the year 2025-26. Respondent counsel …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed three contempt petitions challenging the non‑grant of transfers for the academic year 2025‑26. Respondent states 3 and 4 argued that the petitions had become infructuous because the transfers pertained to that academic year. The petitioners acknowledged the factual situation …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Kadu Narayan Patil filed a writ petition challenging the loan liability alleged against him by the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, presumably to contest the liability or its enforcement. Respondent No.3, through counsel, submitted a statement that …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants filed a civil revision before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the trial court. Subsequently, the applicants, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court considered whether it could grant leave to …
DISPOSED OFF
Ramprasad Tukaram Dabhade filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads, District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The petitioner sought relief despite the existence of a statutory …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants were convicted under IPC sections 353, 323 and 341 read with Section 34 and sentenced to six months’ simple imprisonment with fines, while being acquitted of other charges. They remained on bail throughout the trial, did not misuse liberty, and surrendered after judgment, subsequently …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a group of SC‑category candidates holding M.Phil degrees and fellowships from BARTI and BANRF, filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking a direction to the university to constitute a Research Recommendation Committee and to grant them admission to the Ph.D. programme without …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (including WP 4721/2025, WP 9347/2025, etc.) filed by the petitioners. The petitioners were required to serve spare copies of the petitions on the respondents within a specified time. The Court directed that the spare copies …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Shankar Hiraji Darade, claimed ownership of 83 R of land purchased in 1983, which was entered in the revenue records in their name. In 2011 the respondent applied to correct the mutation, asserting that only 30 R was sold to the petitioners, 23 R remained with …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The respondent failed to appear in both morning and afternoon sessions, leading the court to appoint Ms. Priyanka Sarnaik from the High Court Legal Aid Services Committee to represent her. The applicant was directed to provide a copy of the application memorandum to the newly appointed counsel. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 14351 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the claim of lapse of time rendering the petition ineffective. No …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Satish Gangadhar Sawant, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the clubbing of six First Information Reports (FIRs) registered under various crime numbers with the Majalgaon City Police Station for investigation. The petitioner argued that the FIRs should be combined for trial. The …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, appealed against a reference court award that enhanced compensation for land acquired in Raimoha village for a new railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially offered Rs 2,110‑2,410 per R, but the …
DISPOSED OFF
Vaibhav Vishnu Kale applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, sexual offences under the POCSO Act, and child marriage offences. He claimed the marriage to the minor victim was consensual, performed with parental approval, and that no forcible sexual act occurred. The State …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Abdul Rashid Shaikh Bismilla Bagwan, filed a civil application (No. 724 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant, appearing in court, instructed his counsel, Mr. A. R. Syed, to withdraw the application. The respondent, Dagdu Bapu Khadke and another, were …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, appealed multiple first appeals challenging a common judgment and award dated 9 September 2019 that fixed compensation for lands acquired for a new railway line in Beed district. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation rate from Rs …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, appealed multiple first appeals challenging the compensation rates fixed by a Reference Court for lands acquired for a new railway line in Beed district. The Reference Court had enhanced the rate from Rs.850 per R to Rs.2,161 per R for dry land …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Balwantkaur, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1541 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, on oral instructions, sought to withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Marathwada Gramin Apang Vikas Mandal, filed a writ petition but failed to cooperate with the court despite attempts by counsel to establish contact. The court noted the petitioner's non‑responsiveness and, on that basis, held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the …
DISMISSED
The husband, Suryakant Atkore, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 01.08.2019 that directed him to pay Rs.4,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Family Court had observed that the husband, a truck driver …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, B. Pramod Kumar Reddy Gangareddy and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a suit. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the suit had already been dismissed, leaving no substantive relief to be granted. The court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking relief under prayer clause B. The court examined the application and, without detailed factual findings, allowed the application in accordance with the prayer clause. Consequently, the court directed that the appeal be registered with the office. A …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay and a review application. The Court questioned the applicants' locus standi to file the review. The applicants' counsel then requested permission to withdraw both the civil application and the review application. The Court granted …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Narsing Bhagwandas Bang, filed two family court appeals (Nos. 78 and 79 of 2018) against Smita Narsing Bang. The High Court had earlier ordered that failure to file the private paper book would result in dismissal of the appeals. On 19 August 2026, the appellant did not appear before …
Withdrawn
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking its withdrawal. Their counsel, on their instructions, moved the court to withdraw the application. The court, noting the request, dismissed the application as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were considered. The matter was concluded …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 3785 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil suit No. 312 of 2012, which dealt with the same subject matter, was decided on 9 January 2024. The petitioners argued that the decision of …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Kisan Sadashiv Kamble filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of Crime No. 354 of 2024, which alleged offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR stemmed from a dowry dispute and alleged …
DISMISSED
The appellants, original defendants in a partition suit (Regular Civil Suit No.113 of 2012), challenged the appellate court's order remanding the case for impleading necessary parties and including a left‑out ancestral property. The trial court had dismissed the suit for non‑joinder of necessary …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Prakash Munnalal Kande, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. He sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh application for restoration before the appropriate court. The sole issue before the Court was …
Withdrawn
The applicants, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of the informant, filed an application seeking quash of FIR No.112/15 and the charge sheet RCC No.1093/2015 relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, GOPINATH, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to decide his representation dated 25‑06‑2019 under Section 154(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent State, through its Advocate N. B. Patil, produced a communication dated 17‑12‑2019 indicating that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner and respondents 8‑17 jointly purchased a parcel of land in 2005, resulting in mutation entry No. 39237. Subsequent sales by respondents 8‑17 led to additional mutation entries, which the petitioner challenged under Sections 247 and 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2016 seeking relief, and the Court conditioned the issuance of notice on the petitioners depositing Rs.10,00,000 within 15 days. The petitioners failed to make the deposit, and more than nine and a half years later the Court noted the non‑compliance. …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Prasad Anil Changulpay, was charged with kidnapping and penetrative sexual assault of a 17‑year‑old girl under Sections 137(2), 64(2), 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8, 12 of the POCSO Act. The victim initially went missing, filed a complaint of kidnapping, …
DISPOSED OFF
Shailesh Gulab Dhage filed a criminal writ petition seeking premature release from imprisonment. The petition relied on a letter dated 22.08.2026 from the Superintendent of Open Jail, Paithan. The Court observed that the petitioner had already been released on 06.06.2025 after serving a 26‑year …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The acquiring body, aggrieved by the compensation awarded in Land Acquisition Reference No. 257 of 2007, filed a first appeal and deposited Rs 34,27,415 in the High Court, which stayed execution of the award. The claimants sought withdrawal of the deposited amount, alleging the award payable is Rs …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Shridhar Sonu Patil filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,317‑day delay in filing his first appeal against the Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Tapi Prakalp, Hatnoor Jalgaon and another. The applicant argued that the reasons for the delay were uncontroverted and offered to forgo any …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shubham Arvind Patil, filed a contempt petition (No. 872 of 2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, asserted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with and that no further relief was required. The respondent, represented by the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Parshuram Social and Sports Club, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to continue operating its social club under an existing license. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the club's license had not been renewed. The central issue was whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
Madhav was convicted by a Sessions Court for alleged theft of electricity under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, based on a surprise inspection by MSEB officials who recorded a spot panchanama and photographs of a hook used to draw power. The trial court accepted the prosecution’s case …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants filed appeals against orders dated 2017 and 2016 in civil suits pending before the trial court. Both parties asserted that the disputes had been settled by compromise. The petitioners' counsel submitted the compromise deed for the court's record, and the respondents' counsel concurred …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners Shaikh Tajuddin Shaikh Amiruddin and Shaikh Moinuddin Shaikh Amiruddin filed appeals against orders relating to civil applications pending before the trial court. Both parties asserted that the disputes had been settled by compromise. The petitioners' counsel submitted the compromise …
DISPOSED OFF
Sahebrao Kachru Ghuge filed writ petition No. 27‑WP‑4567‑2018 seeking a direction that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 consider an application he made on 20 June 2016 for information. The petition alleged that the authorities had not yet acted on his request. The High Court examined whether it could compel …
DISPOSED OFF
The Samaki Mata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal filed writ petitions (Nos. 3565 and 3619 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners argued that the matters were still pending and required adjudication. The respondents contended that a …
DISMISSED
In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, appeals No. 78 and 79 of 2018 filed by Narsing Bhagwandas Bang against Smita Narsing Bang were before the court. The court had earlier ordered that failure to file the private paper book would result in dismissal of the appeals. On the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a declaration of the award of their 1.80 hectare land (Gut No.65) acquired under the Old Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and direction for the payment of compensation. The respondents, through the Sub‑Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer, informed …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Dinkar S/o. Nivruttirao Gaikwad, filed a criminal application (No. 3703 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant had died, rendering the application infructuous. The State of …
DISMISSED
The appellant, Atmaram Shankar Ghangaon, appealed against the judgment of the Principal District Judge which upheld a decree in favour of the plaintiffs, Krishna Pandharinath Dandge and Namdeo Pandurang Dandge, confirming their ownership of the suit land and restraining the defendant from …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a judgment debtor, sought to resist a second execution petition filed by the decree holder more than 13 years after a decree was passed on 06‑04‑2002. The petitioner argued that the 12‑year limitation period under Section 136 of the Limitation Act began on the decree date, rendering …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, represented by Mr. P.B. Joshi, sought leave to withdraw the writ petition filed against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Kushivarta Bhausaheb Nannavare, filed a writ petition (No. 14099 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an aspect of the 2015 elections. The petition was filed after the elections had concluded and the petitioner had neither contested nor been elected in …
DISPOSED OFF
Sangitabai Vasudeo Rajput filed a writ petition (No. 13817 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner or his counsel. On 18 March 2026, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief under prayer clauses B and C1, which were inadvertently omitted from the order dated 15 September 2026. The petitioners moved the court to correct this omission. The court examined the claim that the omission was a clerical error and …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Kalusingh Tersingh Pawara, was arrested after police seized 31.120 kg of half‑dried leaves, seeds and branches from a vehicle during a raid, alleging violation of Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii) and 20(b) of the NDPS Act. The defence argued that the seized material may not constitute "ganja" …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a Mamlatdar order directing them to remove an obstruction on a road bordering agricultural lands (Gat Nos. 305 and 313) and a subsequent revision order dismissing their appeal. The respondents argued that an alternate road existed and that electric poles on the boundary …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a former employee of a private school, filed an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, which he later withdrew in 1996 based on an oral assurance from the management that he would be re‑appointed. When the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners Jyoti Satish Kadam and others filed a writ petition (903 WP 15829 of 2023) challenging certain actions of the respondents Jyoti Nitin Thosar and others. During the pendency of the petition, the underlying civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 278 of 2021) was finally disposed by the 8th …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) 2018 and 2019 results and the permanent debarment of about 7,880 candidates for alleged mark‑sheet tampering. The Court examined the statutory powers of the Maharashtra State …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Sakhubai Machindra Gungule and another filed a writ petition (904 WRIT PETITION NO. 11204 OF 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was accompanied by two civil applications (Nos. 17052 and 17053 of 2022). Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Sakhubai Machindra Gungule and another filed a writ petition (904 WRIT PETITION NO. 11204 OF 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Tarabai Ganpat Gahire and others. The petition was accompanied by two civil applications (Nos. 17052 and 17053 of 2022). …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Ganpatrao, filed a criminal application seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The court, after hearing counsel, expressed a disinclination to grant the relief sought. Consequently, counsel for the applicant, on instructions, moved to withdraw the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard Writ Petition No. 15259 of 2025 filed by Rahul Dattatraya Autade against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought accommodation to comply with an earlier order dated 27 January 2026. The Court, exercising its inherent powers, granted a final …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Jyotiram Navnath Autade, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 396 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the trial court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court, …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, disposed of a series of writ petitions filed by several medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance, noting that the issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 July 2026 …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of a series of writ petitions filed by several medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance, noting that the issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 July 2026 (Writ …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of a series of writ petitions filed by medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of a Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the substantive issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court disposed of a group of writ petitions filed by several medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance, noting that the issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 July 2026 (Writ Petition No. 1583 of …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of a series of writ petitions filed by medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the substantive issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a group of medical officers, filed several writ petitions challenging the Public Health Department's denial of their right to engage in private practice and the denial of Non‑Practising Allowance. The High Court noted that the substantive issue had already been decided in a common …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of a series of writ petitions filed by medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance. The Court noted that the substantive issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, disposed of a series of writ petitions filed by medical officers challenging the entitlement to private practice and the payment of Non‑Practising Allowance, noting that the issue had already been decided in a common judgment dated 30 July 2026 (Writ …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, who are bank employees, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 436/2025 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation of funds in a real‑estate partnership dispute. The informant, a partner in the disputed …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions filed by several individuals against the State of Maharashtra challenging orders that had recovered certain amounts from them and denied their retiral benefits. The petitioners contended that the recovery and denial were …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, who are the original defendants, filed a civil revision against the trial court's order refusing to reject the plaint in a 2025 partition suit filed by their siblings. The suit sought partition, separate possession, and rendition of accounts of family properties, alleging that a 1986 …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of several civil applications filed by various respondents against the Union of India (Central Railway) after the corresponding first appeals were already disposed. The court held that with the disposal of the first appeals, nothing remained pending …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Desur village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 800‑900 per R. The Reference Court, hearing grouped reference petitions, enhanced the compensation to Rs 2,181 per R for Jirayat …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed four civil applications (Nos. 13626, 13628, 13630 and 13632 of 2024) in first appeals numbered 770 to 773 of 2026 against various respondents. Each application sought relief in respect of separate disputes. The High …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, who ran a photo studio, was convicted by a Special Judge for raping an 11-year‑old girl, who was also described as mentally retarded, and for multiple offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The appeal challenged the conviction on grounds that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, RadhaKrushna Mahila Nagari Path Sanstha, sought leave to appeal an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was to be filed in the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Sachin Baburao Kamble, a cashier at HDFC Bank, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging he facilitated the misappropriation of loan amounts meant for women self‑help groups (Mahila Bachat Gats). The prosecution alleged that Kamble, acting as a teller, disbursed cash to a sales …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) petitions challenging awards of compensation granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad in several reference cases. The State contended that the compensation awarded exceeded the ceiling of four times the amount fixed by …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, ChandraKant Govindrao Indrale, filed an application seeking condonation of a 2,126‑day delay in preferring an appeal against a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The court found no objection to the contents of the application, no evidence of any oblique motive, and noted that the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Prakash Manik Ghuge filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the term of the Gram Panchayat that was the subject of the relief sought expired. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of stamp duty appeals challenging awards of compensation granted by a reference court in various civil matters. The State argued that the compensation awarded exceeded four times the amount previously granted by the State Legal Aid Office (SLAO). The State …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, Vishnu L. Kanse and Sumanbai D. Kanse, challenged a 2009 judgment and award concerning land acquired for the Kasura Bruhat Project, seeking a compensation rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity. Their land, classified as dry, had previously been awarded Rs.399.50 and Rs.600 …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, Vishnu L. Kanse and Sumanbai D. Kanse, challenged a 2009 compensation award for land acquired for the Kasura Bruhat Project, seeking a higher rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Jalna and the acquiring body, …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed several first‑appeal (stamp) petitions challenging the judgment and award dated 23‑04‑2014 of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had granted compensation in a series of stamp duty cases. The State contended that the reference court’s compensation was …
DISMISSED
On 24 March 2025 the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, granted the applicant interim relief restraining coercive steps, conditioned upon the deposit of Rs.50,000 in the Family Court. The applicant failed to make the deposit and the notice to the respondent could not be served due to an …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Anita Bramaji Kapate and others, filed a civil application against Ramakrishna Ravul and another. The High Court examined the application and, after considering the relief sought in prayer clause B, decided to allow the application. The court ordered that the appeal be registered. …
DISPOSED OFF
Jayshree Chandraprakash Chavan filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, which rejected her application to summon witnesses in a divorce proceeding under Section 13(1)(i‑a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner sought either a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Haaris Mamu Shaikh, filed a writ petition (No. 13349 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. The matter remained pending for several years without any prosecution by the petitioner. On 8 January 2026, the petitioner failed to …
DISPOSED OFF
Giridhari Deepa Rathod filed a writ petition (924/2017) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging the respondents Mulchand Pema Rathod and others. The petitioners argued that the matter had already been resolved in an earlier case, R.C.S. No.53 of 2013, which was settled before the …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first appeals challenging judgments of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad that awarded compensation in stamp duty matters. The State argued that the reference court's compensation exceeded the permissible limit, claiming it was more than four …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging judgments dated 23 April 2014 of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad, which awarded compensation in several stamp duty cases. The State contended that the reference court’s compensation exceeded the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a civil suit seeking declaration and injunction and later applied, under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, to amend the plaint to include a controversy over certain mutation records. The trial court rejected the amendment, noting that the plaintiff already possessed …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Manish Patil and his sister‑in‑law Shweta Patil applied to quash FIR No.0159 of 2023 filed under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34. The informant, respondent No.2, appeared in court and submitted an affidavit stating that the parties have amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and have …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sachin Ajayabsing Adbalwar, challenged an order dated 12 July 2018 issued by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, in Appeal No.150 of 2014, which was made under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The petitioner sought …
DISPOSED OFF
The case concerned a civil application (Civil Application No. 13405 of 2024) filed in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, together with a first appeal (First Appeal No. 298 of 2026). The appellants were the Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, and the respondents were …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to respondent No.3 to decide two representations dated 15 July 2025 and 6 August 2025. Respondent No.3, through counsel Mr. Pulkundwar, waived service of notice and gave an undertaking to decide the representations within two weeks of …
DISMISSED
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed an arbitration proceeding involving three landowners and the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition. The appellant argued that the matter was already decided in Arbitration Appeal No. 72 of 2025, which had been dismissed. The court held that …
DISPOSED OFF
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed Arbitration Appeal No. 76 of 2025 challenging a land‑acquisition dispute involving three private respondents and the Competent Authority of the Jayakwadi Project. The appellant argued that the matter was distinct from earlier proceedings, but the …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Khan Asif Dulekhan and others filed writ petition No. 15324 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel Mr. V.S. Bedre, sought leave of the court to withdraw the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition (901/2023) challenging a July 2022 order of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Dhule, which had rejected their application to impound a document in Special Civil Suit No. 88 of 2015. The High Court issued notice to the respondents but granted no interim relief. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, represented by senior counsel Rajendra Deshmukh, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and to file a fresh petition challenging the same orders. The Court granted the request, disposing of the writ petition as withdrawn while keeping all points open for future litigation. …
DISMISSED
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed an arbitral award concerning a land acquisition dispute with Sanjay Rajendra Late and the Competent Authority. The appellant argued that the matter had already been decided in Arbitration Appeal No. 72 of 2025, which was dismissed by this …
DISPOSED OFF
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed an arbitral proceeding involving Sanjay Rajendra Late and the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition. The appellant argued that the matter should be heard, but the court noted that the controversy had already been covered by its order dated …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered four civil applications arising from a suit concerning agricultural land. It allowed the amendment to add a subsequent purchaser to the second appeal and directed that the amendment be effected within two weeks, with notice to the proposed respondent No.3. The court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant filed a civil application seeking permission to serve the respondents by way of paper publication, alleging that their address could not be ascertained. The respondent's counsel appeared and opposed the request. The court examined the adequacy of the application and the necessity of …
RULE ABSOLUTE
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State of Maharashtra and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. However, the Court set aside the order permanently …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Srinivasa Rayalu B., filed a criminal application seeking quashment of FIR No. 65/2022 registered under multiple sections of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, alleging that the FIR contains omnibus accusations without naming any accused. He relied on a prior judgment dated 25 June 2025 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer Seena Kolegaon Medium Project District, Osmanabad and others filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 232‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court at Paranda. The Court examined the reasons for the delay, which were attributed to …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Sambhaji Vaijinath Bedade filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents alleging non-payment of salary arrears. Respondent No.4, the District Social Welfare Officer, submitted a letter confirming that Respondent No.6 had forwarded the petitioner's …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants sought to replace the name of the deceased non‑applicant, Narayan Shamaji Parmar, with Tanaji Nanasaheb Deshmukh, who claims to be the Chairman of Bada Hanuman (Balaji) Mandir Trust. The counsel for the original non‑applicant did not object and even supported the substitution. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The original claimants, aggrieved by a 2011 land acquisition award for the Waghur Dam, filed a first appeal after a delay of 4,038 days. They sought condonation of the delay, relying on a prior order that had condoned a similar delay of 3,995 days in a related case, and cited the decision in Suresh …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners sought the grant of advanced/additional increments under the Government Resolution dated 14 December 2006, alleging that they were eligible but had not received the benefits. The State of Maharashtra contended that eligibility needed to be verified. The Court noted that the matter …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Pravin Dnyaneswar Shejwale, filed a writ petition (4 WR 5625 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, Savita Pravin Shejwale, contended that the main proceeding from which the writ arose had already been dismissed, a fact not disputed by the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Santosh Uttamrao Mundkar, Laxmi Vitthalrao Pandagale, and Megha Kondiba Pandagale, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petitioners were required to first approach the Grievance Committee established under the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Santosh Uttamrao Mundkar, Laxmi Vitthalrao Pandagale, and Megha Kondiba Pandagale, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court was asked to determine the appropriate forum for redressing their grievances. The Court noted the existence of a …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Rukmibai Chandrabhai Ghume filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had already been disposed of, leaving no substantive relief to be granted. The court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of three civil applications filed by respondents against the Union of India (Central Railway) after the corresponding first appeals were already disposed. The Court held that once the first appeals are concluded, the pending civil applications do not …
DISPOSED OFF
Shaikh Parveen Bano Ibrahim filed a writ petition seeking a transfer of her posting on the ground of couple convenience, requesting a posting within a 30 km radius. She alleged that the State authorities had not considered her request despite a representation made on 28‑10‑2025. The Court referred …
DISPOSED OFF
The matter concerned a second appeal (No. 417 of 2025) filed by Jagannath Kalu Patil (deceased) Laxmibai Jagannath Patil and others against Shankar Supdu Patil and another, along with a related civil application (No. 12520 of 2025). The appellants, through their counsel, sought the court's …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, Jagannath Kalu Patil (deceased) LRs Laxmibai Jagannath Patil and others, filed a second appeal (No. 417 of 2025) against Shankar Supdu Patil and another. The appellants, through their counsel, sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The learned judge considered the request …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR No. 028/2022 and the proceedings before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, which alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 34 IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
Withdrawn
Alka, the wife of Gajanan Pankade, filed a criminal revision application (No. 24 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against her husband Gajanan. The applicant, through Advocate Mr. Yash A. Jadhav, sought leave of the court to withdraw the revision. The sole question before the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, representing the estate of the deceased Vaijanath Shetkar, sought payment of compensation awarded on 20‑12‑1982, which had not been disbursed. The deceased had initially refused a notice to accept the amount but later applied on 21‑05‑1987, accepting the notice and acknowledging a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ramabai Digambar Kulkarni, filed a writ petition seeking the return of land acquired in 1991 and handed over to the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) for an industrial area, alleging that the land remained unused. The MIDC rejected the request, stating the land …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Govind Supdu Patil, filed Civil Application No. 14182 of 2025 seeking to have the second appeal listed for a final hearing. The application was presented before the Hon'ble Justice Arun R. Pedneker. No respondents appeared before the court. The court considered the application and, …
DISMISSED
The petitioner, Nanasaheb Uttamrao Vanve, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of delay and a revision application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Advocate S.G. Sangle. The court noted that the petitioner’s …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, heirs of a deceased landowner, challenged a 2016 compensation award arising from compulsory land acquisition, alleging that they were entitled to a higher rate of compensation as granted in a later, identical case. Their first appeal was filed after a delay of 2,264 days, and they …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Suwalal Mankchand Nabriya, filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit. The court observed that the underlying suit had already been disposed of. Consequently, the court found no remaining matter for adjudication in the writ petition. It ordered that the petition stand disposed. …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Pankaj Pawar, a former sales officer of HDFC Bank, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a large‑scale loan fraud involving bogus members of several Mahila Bachat Gats, alleged to have misappropriated about Rs 30 lakh. The prosecution’s case, based on the FIR, statements …
DISPOSED OFF
Mohd. Masiuddin filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Ravishankar Kishanrao Patil and other respondents. The applicant sought reliefs specified in prayer clauses B and C of the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, S. S. Kazi, presented …
DISPOSED OFF
Manik Vithalrao Katmande was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 30 days imprisonment plus a compensation of Rs.4.30 lakh to the complainant. He appealed, but the Sessions Judge and the appellate court upheld the conviction. In a criminal revision under …
Disposed off/Dismissed for default
The petitioner, an engineering student, mistakenly clicked the cancellation button on the Directorate of Technical Education (DTE) website, leading to the cancellation of his admission to Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College. He filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his admission not be …
Withdrawn
The petitioners Rohit Mahendra Valvi and another filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody. The learned counsel for the applicants argued at length, but the court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail. On the court's indication, the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition concerned a communication dated 16 February 2022 issued by the Joint Commissioner (Group B), Municipal Council Administration, …
Rejected at Admission stage
The wife filed an application seeking transfer of her divorce (Marriage Petition No. A‑296 of 2025) from the Family Court, Akola to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani, asserting her residence is in Parbhani and that a restitution of conjugal rights petition pending in Parbhani should be …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Rangnath Nivrutti Barkule, a landowner from a remote village, sought enhancement of compensation awarded by a Reference Court but filed his appeal 563 days late. He applied to the High Court for condonation of this delay, citing poverty, lack of awareness of procedural requirements, and difficulty …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer sought condonation of a 165‑day delay in filing an appeal, arguing there were no malafides. The State authorities waived service of notice, and the court was asked to call for records and dispense with printing. An interim stay was sought, but since the amount had already been …
DISPOSED OFF
Kantabai Balu Tobare, a democratically elected member of a Village Panchayat in 2021, faced a no‑confidence motion passed by the majority of the local body members. Feeling aggrieved, she challenged the motion before the appropriate authorities under the relevant statute, but her challenge was …
DISPOSED OFF
In Contempt Petition No. 742 of 2015 arising out of WP/10066/2014, the petitioners alleged that the respondents had not paid the compensation due to them. The Attorney General initially claimed the petitioners were not coming to accept the compensation, but later produced receipts (identified as …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Vijay Prabhakar Narle and others filed a writ petition challenging the findings of the Junior Division Civil Judge, Sillod, and the District Judge, Sambhajinagar, which had allowed the respondents' application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure and a subsequent …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) was hearing Criminal Revision Application No.65 of 2017 filed by Devesh Pathrikar against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant’s counsel, Shri Vishal Arjun Chavan, sought a two‑week adjournment because the order dated 28‑09‑2026 had been challenged …
DISPOSED OFF
The husband, Pravin Jadhav, appealed against a lower court order directing him to pay Rs.10,000 per month as maintenance to his wife and minor son under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The wife had filed an application alleging domestic violence and an extramarital affair, …
DISPOSED OFF
Laxminarayan was convicted under Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the court and a fine of Rs.10,000, which he subsequently served and paid. He appealed the conviction, but both …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant filed an arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to Clause 18 of a reconstituted partnership deed dated 16‑01‑2007. The applicant issued a notice on 29‑09‑2025 invoking the arbitration clause, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Kisan Kachru Tupe (deceased) and others, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dated 03‑09‑2019 that dismissed their 2015 complaint (ULP No.141) on the ground of a purported separate factory‑level agreement. The petitioners failed to produce the alleged …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Subhash Deochand Ambekar, filed a civil revision application (No. 114 of 2015) along with two related civil applications. The applicant died on 23 December 2024, and a death certificate was produced and marked for identification. The petitioner’s counsel noted that there was no …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Merabai Buddhar Patel and others, filed a writ petition (No. 290 of 2020) challenging an order dated 1 October 2019 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑1, Shahada, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 16 of 2019. The petition had been pending since 2020 with no interim relief granted. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants filed a motion seeking correction of a typographical error in Clause V of paragraph 10 of the order dated 19.08.2026. The error involved the words "appellants/claimants" which should have read "respondent – Acquiring Body". The court examined the request and determined that such a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief. During the pendency of the case, subsequent developments rendered the petition unnecessary. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and disposed of the writ petition as …
DISPOSED OFF
In a suit for possession and perpetual injunction, the petitioners filed two applications (Exh.116 and 117) seeking an order directing the defendants to produce certain documents. The trial court held that the applications were incorrectly titled as notices and therefore did not consider them on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Hemant G. Meher, filed a civil suit seeking declaration of ownership and a perpetual injunction over 40R of land in Survey No. 200. He obtained an order appointing a Court Commissioner to measure the land, whose report was later accepted by the trial court. During trial, the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The Court considered Civil Application No. 1238 of 2024 filed by the appellant seeking to fix a date for the final hearing of Second Appeal No. 554 of 2007. The application was made on the ground that a hearing date needed to be scheduled. The Court examined the application and found no objection to …
Transfer to other court
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions for hearing in compliance with a Supreme Court judgment dated 10 April 2026 in Income Tax Officer, Ward2(1), Chandigarh vs. Tej Pratap Singh. The petitioners sought to challenge the constitutional validity of Section …
DISPOSED OFF
Ahmednagar Shahar Sahakari Bank Maryadit filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to the State and other respondents to lodge an FIR based on its complaint dated 26 March 2019. The High Court had earlier observed that an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code had already …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Govind Poslya Gavit and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel moved to withdraw the petition after a ministerial order dated 14 October 2024 in RTS 31A 24/Case No.166/J-6A. The court considered the withdrawal request and, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of the Irrigation Department (the acquiring body) filed an appeal 2,725 days after the original order, prompting a civil application for condonation of delay. The claimant (respondent No.1) and the Attorney General of the State opposed the condonation. The court examined the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vitthal Rama Wagmare, challenged a 2016 order of the Superintendent of Land Records, Osmanabad, which had been confirmed by a 2019 order of the State Minister. The petitioner alleged that the Minister’s confirmation was issued without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Shahista Moin Sheikh, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a ‘B’ summary report filed by the Investigating Officer. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a protest petition against the summary report. The Court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The appellant Ramesh was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate and later by a Sessions Court for an offence under Section 498(A) IPC, based on a complaint by his wife alleging harassment and dowry-related cruelty after a sixteen‑year marriage and the birth of five daughters. He appealed the conviction, …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, noting that many petitions required amendment, extended the time for filing such amendments by four weeks from the date of the order, granting …
DISPOSED OFF
Omprakashji Ratanlalji Malpani filed a writ petition (No. 12223 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court examined whether the …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Pramila Kisanrao Gajbhie, sought permission to file an appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging an earlier order. The court considered the request and, instead of allowing the appeal, disposed of the criminal revision application as withdrawn, granting …
DISPOSED OFF
The Special Lok Adalat of the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by New India Assurance Company Limited relating to motor accident claim awards. The insurer sought condonation of delay in filing the appeals and submitted withdrawal letters authorising the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition but failed to file a rejoinder or any subsequent affidavit despite multiple orders granting time. The petitioners' counsel repeatedly sought extensions, and the court granted last chances, yet the petitioners did not appear. The court observed that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Shivdas Vanji Mali, filed a civil application seeking substitute service of notice to respondents No. 11 and No. 12 by way of newspaper publication, as the bailiff reported that the respondents were not residing at the addresses provided. The same addresses had been used in a prior …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Court dealt with several civil applications arising from a land acquisition dispute, including a request for a 12‑week period to deposit 50% of the award, a stay of execution of the judgment, and a petition for condonation of a delay of 866 days in filing an X‑objection. The applicant argued …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Shree Swami Services Labour and Security Contractor, was awarded a contract to collect garbage for the Jamner Municipal Council and performed the work in October‑November 2021, submitting bills for payment. Despite repeated requests, the respondent (Chief Officer of Jamner Municipal …
DISPOSED OFF
Kavita Prakash Lakare filed a writ petition challenging an attachment order issued by Shri Balasaheb Satbhai Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. The petitioner claimed that the land in dispute was transferred to her before the bank obtained an order under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Bessy Kuzhimannile Mathew, paid a sum as sale consideration to Bank of Baroda and later sought a refund of that amount along with interest. The Bank, through its counsel, undertook to refund the principal amount within four weeks, which the court accepted as a binding undertaking. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Vivekanand Ramkrishna Gundewar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the President of Nanded Town Market Area Housing Building Co‑operative Society Ltd. The petitioner relied on an order dated 04‑12‑2023 passed by the Joint Charity …
DISPOSED OFF
The petition challenged the reservation of Gram Panchayat seats for the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in villages where no ST persons reside, arguing that such reservation is unwarranted. Respondents contended that reservations are based on census data showing ST population in the area, and the …