Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 9801–10000
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, appealed a judgment and award dated 19 September 2022 issued by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed in a land acquisition matter. The appeal was filed after a delay of 281 days, which the appellant attributed to …
The appellant, Shamdhan, alleged that he extended a hand loan of Rs.3,75,000 to the accused, Vidhya, who later issued a cheque that was dishonoured. He claimed to have served a legal notice demanding payment, leading to a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashment of FIR No. 0439 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 498‑A, 504, 506 and 34 for domestic cruelty and dowry demands. The informant, Madhuri, accused her husband …
The Superintending Engineer, Regional Electricity Circle Construction, filed a civil application seeking a stay of the award against Ramshetti and others. The applicant's counsel submitted that the entire awarded amount had already been deposited with the Court. The primary issue was whether the …
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed three civil applications (Nos. 725, 727, 729 of 2025) which were linked to first appeals (Nos. 802, 803, 804 of 2026). The High Court observed that the first appeals had been disposed of, and consequently the pending …
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Rajuri Navgan village for a new railway line and initially offered compensation of Rs.2000‑2250 per R. Claimants filed reference petitions, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.6875 per R for Jirayat land and …
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project, Omerga filed a civil application against Mohan Krishnaji Gaikwad and others. The court’s order dated 3 September 2026 mistakenly recorded that claimants could withdraw 50% of the amount with interest upon an undertaking and 25% upon a surety, instead of …
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project, Omerga filed a civil application against Mohan Krishnaji Gaikwad and others. The court’s order dated 3 September 2026 mistakenly recorded that claimants could withdraw 50% of the amount with interest upon an undertaking and 25% upon a surety, instead of …
Tarachand Yashwant Jadav filed a contempt petition against Suvarna Mane, Deputy Conservator of Forest, alleging non‑compliance with a court order. The respondent appeared before the court and submitted an additional affidavit stating that the pension proposal for the petitioner had been forwarded to …
A complaint was lodged with the Maharashtra Lokayukta alleging encroachment of government and gaothan land by a sarpanch in Jalna district. The Lokayukta’s confidential report under Section 12(3) of the Maharashtra Lokayukta and Upa‑Lokayuktas Act, 1971 found deficiencies in the Zilla Parishad …
The applicant/accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour of a cheque of Rs. 12,00,000 issued to the respondent/complainant, and his appeal was dismissed by the Sessions Court, leading to this criminal revision. The complainant alleged that he …
The petitioners, six Zilla Parishad teachers in Latur district, challenged transfer orders dated 22‑08‑2025 on the ground that the postings placed them more than 30 kilometres away from their spouses, allegedly contravening Government Resolutions of 07‑04‑2021 and 18‑06‑2024 which require such …
The appellants filed a motion to speak to the minutes of the order dated 19.08.2026, alleging a typographical error in Clause V of paragraph 10 where the words "appellants/claimants" were used. They sought substitution of the phrase "respondent – Acquiring Body" in place of the erroneous wording. …
The appellants filed a motion seeking correction of a typographical error in the minutes of an order dated 19.08.2026. The error was in Clause V of paragraph 10 where the words "appellants/claimants" were mistakenly used. The court examined the request and determined that the error could be …
The Special Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of first appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. against various claimants in motor accident claim petitions. The insurance company, through its advocate Mr. R.H. Dahat, submitted email instructions withdrawing …
The applicants, brothers Sakharam and Tukaram Shinde, sought quashment of an FIR and pending criminal case arising from a land‑partition dispute with the complainant, Sanjay Shinde, who alleged assault on him despite his disability. The court noted an unexplained delay of over a year in filing the …
The petitioners, Rajendrasing and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. They later applied to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the concerned magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Criminal …
Yogirao Nivrutti Gawandi filed a contempt petition (No. 817 of 2019) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner alleged that an order of contempt had been passed against the State. The petitioner’s counsel, R. V. Gunale, submitted that the State had complied with the contempt order. The bench …
Petitioner Laxman Bholaram Bundele filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15.04.2017 of the 21st Joint CJJD, Aurangabad, which rejected his application for a temporary injunction in RCS No. 654 of 2016. The order was subsequently affirmed by the District Judge, Aurangabad, on 25.08.2023. …
The petitioner, a B.Com and B.P.Ed graduate, challenged the appointment of a candidate (Respondent No. 6) as Shikshan Sevak, alleging that the advertisement in Punya Nagari required a B.P.Ed qualification, which the appointee did not possess, holding only a B.Ed. The respondent management argued …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking directions to the Union of India and the Central Railway to decide their applications dated 07.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 within the statutory time limit. Respondent No.1, represented by counsel, waived notice and, together with the State, stated that the …
The Union of India, as the acquiring body for a new railway line, appealed against the Reference Court’s award that enhanced compensation for Jirayat lands in Rajuri Navgan village from the rates fixed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer to Rs 6875 per R. The claimants had produced oral and …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of three civil applications filed by the Union of India (Central Railway) against various respondents because the corresponding first appeals had already been decided. The court held that once the first appeals are disposed, the pending civil …
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications in the Bombay High Court relating to three separate respondents. These applications were pending alongside first appeals (Nos. 795, 796, and 797 of 2026). The Court observed that once the …
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Rajuri Navgan village for a new railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 1,800‑2,250 per R, but the claimants obtained a higher rate of Rs 6,875 per R from the Reference Court. The …
Dr. Prakash Kanhayalal Kamkriya filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later approached the Court requesting leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant such …
The petitioner, Devidas Nandu Rathod, filed a writ petition against Bhau Dagdu Rathod. The court observed that both the petitioner and Respondent No.1 had died, and directed the petitioner to record their legal heirs within four weeks. The petitioner was given a deadline of 04.10.2025 to comply. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.0328/2024, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on a complaint by the wife of Applicant No.1. The FIR accused the husband of harassment and …
The applicant, Santosh Gorakh Punde, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The court …
The petitioner, Devising, filed a criminal revision application (No. 267 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the State. The respondent State, through counsel Mr. Aher, produced a letter from the Nashik Road Central Prison dated 12‑08‑2026 confirming …
Ganesh Murlidhar Sonawane was charged under Sections 109, 118(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting a minor with an iron rod. The prosecution alleged the act was pre‑meditated and caused serious injuries requiring hospitalization. The applicant contended …
Arun Yashwant Medhe alias Doctor Baba was convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(J) and 376(3) and under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for offences involving sexual assault, and was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. He filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and …
The appellant, Shivaji Narsimlu Gurulwar, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the appeal, the respondent submitted a communication dated 8 March 2026 along with a death certificate indicating that the appellant had died on 30 December 2023. The court …
Jilani Vali Sayyed filed Writ Petition No. 818 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the manager of M/s B G Construction Technology Ltd. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on multiple occasions, including on 23 February 2026 and 4 March 2026. The …
The appellants' land was acquired in 1986 for a percolation tank, with compensation of Rs.3,600 per acre awarded by the State Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO). The claimants contended that the compensation was inadequate, arguing that the SLAO relied on average sale values rather than the highest …
The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Mahila Bachat Gat Massa Khandeshwari Thro, filed writ petition No. 2396 of 2020 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the cause of …
The petitioner, Munjabhau Bhagwanrao Thite, challenged a temporary injunction granted by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jintur, Parbhani, which was affirmed by the District Judge in a civil appeal. The petition, filed in 2017, sought to set aside the injunction order dated 22 April 2016. The High …
The appellant, Shubham Dattatrya Gondkar, was arrested in connection with the death of his father, initially recorded as accidental but later investigated as murder under Section 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The defence argued that the deceased suffered a prior accident and …
The Rahuri Education Society filed a writ petition seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel later requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the parties had reached an out-of-court settlement. The court considered whether a petition can be withdrawn after filing. Relying on the …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The petitioner, Dilip Laxmanrao Aher, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Parwati Sahakari Gruh Nirman Sanstha Ltd. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard Civil Application No. 258 of 2025, a writ petition filed by Balaji Gangaram Sonawane against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition sought relief as specified in prayer clauses B and B‑1. After hearing the parties, the Court allowed the …
The petitioners, Adarsh Education Society and its president, filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra's rejection of their proposal for the 2024-25 academic year on the basis that their NAAC accreditation had expired on 4 November 2021. The petitioners argued that they had obtained …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The applicant, Sahil, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody. During the proceedings, the applicant, through counsel, requested to withdraw the bail application. The issue before the court was whether the applicant could be permitted to …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard a motion to correct the minutes of an order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of land‑acquisition appeals. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been mistakenly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and …
The applicants filed a writ petition seeking condonation of a 2,496‑day delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 on record. The respondents, through counsel, indicated they would appear on behalf of the legal heirs and argued that the …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The petitioners challenged the trial court’s order rejecting their application to frame two additional issues in suits for specific performance of a contract. They argued that the document in question was a security for a loan, not an agreement to sell, and that the market value of the agricultural …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The …
The petitioners sought to set aside the trial court's order rejecting their application to frame two additional issues in suits for specific performance of a purported agreement to sell dated 4 January 2010. They argued that the document was merely a security for a loan and that the market value of …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body …
Balaji Rajebhau Chavan filed two bail applications (Nos. 2320/2025 and 2179/2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The first application was filed through a private counsel, while the second was filed by a lawyer appointed under legal aid. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw …
The petitioner, Adarsh Education Society, filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra’s rejection of its proposal for the 2024‑25 academic year on the ground that its NAAC accreditation had expired on 4‑Nov‑2021. The petitioner argued that it had already obtained a B+ grade NAAC …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioner, Sharad, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the actions taken against the Sarpanch and Village Development Officer (VDO) of Janve Village Panchayat. The respondents submitted a communication indicating that the Sarpanch's term had ended, a disqualification report had been …
Magma HDI General Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed a stamp matter before the National Lok Adalat of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking resolution of a claim by Rekha Chandrakant Samale and other family members. The panel, after verifying the identities of the claimants and confirming that …
The applicants filed a civil revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting their application to dismiss a suit on grounds of limitation and improper valuation. They argued that the suit seeking cancellation of a 1997 relinquishment deed was filed within the three‑year period prescribed by …
The petitioner, Sahebrao Asaraji Adik, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for the acquisition of his agricultural land (Gut No.227) in Khanapur, Taluka Shrirampur, District Ahilyanagar. The petition originally contained a prayer clause that was deemed innocuous but required amendment. The …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay and restoration of a first appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The respondents were Sambhu Wajya Gavit (deceased). The primary …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Kasturbai Dattatraya Kulkarni, filed a civil application seeking to withdraw the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co., appealed the award, contesting the amount. The High Court examined the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, dealt with a series of land‑acquisition disputes where the Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against several landowners who claimed compensation. The appellants sought to introduce additional evidence, particularly concerning the presence of …
The petitioner, Sayed Nasir Sayed Sultan, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21‑01‑2017 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ashti, which had been affirmed by the District Judge in a miscellaneous civil appeal. The petitioner sought a direction that the trial court should decide the …
Arjun Limbaijirao Sukre filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the State of Maharashtra to decide his representation dated 18 August 2025. The petitioner alleged undue delay and sought a direction for a prompt decision. The Court examined …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anuradha Tanaji Bharade, the wife of a deceased man who had allegedly sent a video accusing her of illicit relations, leading to his suicide. The FIR under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was based largely on suspicion …
The petitioner, appointed as a peon on an ad‑hoc basis on 11‑08‑2010, served continuously but was never granted permanency or the pay‑scale salary stipulated for private‑school employees. He filed a complaint under Section 28(1) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair …
The appellant's land in Rohina village was acquired under a Section 4 notification on 27‑04‑2000 for the Nimna Dudhana Project, with an award dated 10‑04‑2003 fixing compensation at Rs 800 per R. The appellant sought the benefit of escalation on the ground of parity, arguing that similar lands had …
The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court despite a specific order dated 06.04.2026 directing their presence. The court observed that the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No …
Mukund Rameshwar Bhulange was convicted by an Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Special Case No.89 of 2021 for an offence under Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, receiving a six‑month imprisonment and a fine which has been paid. He filed a criminal …
The petitioner, Bhikkan Sardar Tadvi, filed a contempt petition challenging the State of Maharashtra for allegedly failing to pass a mandated award. The High Court had earlier directed the award to be passed, and the petitioner sought enforcement through contempt proceedings. The court observed that …
Sushilabai Deoram Pawar filed a writ petition against Guman alias Shriram Deoram Pawar and others. The respondent's counsel informed the court that the underlying Regular Civil Appeal No. 33 of 2019 had already been dismissed for want of prosecution by the District Judge‑2, Amalner on 7 June 2023. …
Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. Their counsel later applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No …
Shriram General Insurance Co. filed a first appeal against a decision involving Anita Haribha... and others. The insurer, through its counsel, submitted written instructions (pursis) to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after considering the withdrawal documents, ordered that the appeal be …
The petitioners, Manohar Indrabhans Sarode and others, filed two continuation petitions challenging a contempt order. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, were represented by Ms. M.N. Ghanekar. The petitioners complied with the contempt order, as acknowledged by their counsel. On …
The petitioners, Bhange Organic Chemicals Private Limited, challenged a letter dated 22 June 2023 that denied their request for police protection while working in their company. They had earlier applied for such protection on 6 May 2023, but the impugned letter gave no reasons for the refusal. The …
The case involves an appeal filed by Rohidas Sahebrao Tajanpure and another against M/s Trymens Properties, represented by proprietor Deepak Haridas Jadhav. The appeal challenges Order No. 19 of 2026 and is accompanied by two pending civil applications. Both parties presented their submissions …
The petitioners Rohidas Sahebrao Tajanpure and another appealed against an order dated 2026 in a civil matter involving M/s Trymens Properties. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard arguments from counsel for both sides. The court, after considering the submissions, allowed the regular …
The original claimants filed two civil applications seeking a court order directing the respondent to deposit a deficit amount arising from a miscalculation of days in a prior award, together with 12% interest. The court found that the discrepancy in calculation was undisputed and that the award had …
The acquiring body appealed a 2014 land acquisition award and deposited 80% of the award amount in the High Court as a condition for a stay. The original claimant, Madhukar Mahadappa Sarane, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the deposited sum. The Court allowed a partial withdrawal: …
The applicant, Kamla Bai Rameshwar Zawar, filed a second appeal 7 days beyond the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The application was presented before the Hon'ble Judge Sanjay A. Deshmukh, who examined the reasons provided for the delay. The court considered whether the delay …
The petitioner, Sopan Namdeo Kale, was appointed as a teacher in 2003 to a clear, vacant permanent post but was issued yearly appointment orders that labelled his service as temporary. After serving continuously for fifteen years, the management refused to allow him to join duty in 2017 and …
The petitioner, Rayees Khan Zafar Khan Pathan, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Ramesh Onkar Thakur, challenged the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his claim of belonging to the “Thakur” Scheduled Tribe. He submitted pre‑constitution documents dated 1926 and 1932, which the Committee discarded, insisting on an …
Gopal Rangnath Devare applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the Police Inspector. The Court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant bail. The applicant’s counsel, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court granted permission to …
A batch of writ petitions filed by assistant teachers and junior college teachers appointed before 1 November 2005 sought a declaration that they remain governed by the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, the Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 and the …
A group of assistant teachers and junior college teachers appointed before 1 November 2005 in partially or fully aided schools filed writ petitions seeking declaration that they remain governed by the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, the 1984 Commutation Rules and the General …
The appellant filed an application seeking condonation of a fifteen‑day delay in filing a first appeal under Section 41D(vi) of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act. The court noted that the contents of the application were not contested and that the delay was minimal. Considering the uncontroversial …
The applicant was charged under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code for stealing buffaloes and a calf belonging to two villagers. He was found standing with the stolen animals at a cattle market, and the prosecution’s witnesses identified him as the possessor. The trial court convicted him, …
Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd filed Civil Application No.13046 of 2025 seeking condonation of a 37‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The court examined the reasons for the delay and concluded that it was not deliberate. Accordingly, the application for condonation was allowed, and the delay …
Petitioners Prashant Lachhiram Dasarwar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioners' counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, held that the petition was indeed …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Jalna filed an application seeking condonation of a 101‑day delay in filing an appeal against a decree. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons, which were detailed in the application. The Court examined the reasons and found them …
Kisan Baburao Kumbhar filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit involving Pooja Kisan Kumbhar, a minor, and another party. The respondents argued that the underlying civil suit had already been disposed of, leaving no operative relief to be granted. The Court examined the submissions and found …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dealt with a massive group of writ petitions challenging the cancellation of TET 2018 and 2019 results of thousands of candidates and their permanent debarment from future exams. The court found that the Maharashtra State Examination Council, acting under …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, issued an order on 28 April 2026 concerning a large number of writ petitions filed in 2025. The court directed the petitioners to take necessary steps within four weeks from the date of the order, failing which the petitions would be dismissed without further …
The applicants, Samir Yasin Pathan and another, filed a criminal application and subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned advocate for the applicants requested that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether it could grant such a withdrawal. Finding no …
The applicant, Pushpamala Gopinathrao Nalawade, filed a criminal revision application 19 days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The respondent State of Maharashtra, through counsel, opposed the condonation on the ground that the delay was not properly explained. The …
The petitioners Amanulla Khan, Harun Khan and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction that Respondent No.7 decide the representations they had submitted on 6 June 2024 and 10 June 2024. The Court examined whether the administrative authority …
The petitioner, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking entitlement to the one‑step pay scale and related salary arrears applicable to staff serving in Tribal and PESA areas, as per the Government Resolution dated 29‑02‑2024. The High Court noted that the issues were already decided in …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) examined a massive Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) scandal in which marks of thousands of candidates were altered. It held that the State and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination were within their statutory powers to cancel the tainted results …
The petitioner, Sheshrao Ramrao Mirge, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dated 06‑11‑2019 that dismissed his 2015 complaint on the ground that a separate factory‑level agreement existed. The High Court noted that the petitioner had not produced the alleged agreement …
The petitioner, Balkrishna Yeshwantrao Bansod, filed a complaint (ULP No. 218 of 2015) before the Industrial Court, Aurangabad, alleging a grievance against MS Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Maryadit. The Industrial Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that a separate agreement existed …
The applicant, Pawan Jitendra Ghundiyal, filed two applications seeking cancellation of bail orders No. 4 of 2023 and No. 2 of 2023 issued by the High Court. The issue before the court was whether the bail orders should be set aside. The applicant, through counsel, later instructed that both …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of writ petitions filed by numerous assistant teachers and junior college teachers appointed before 1 November 2005 in partially‑aided or 100 %‑aided schools. The petitioners sought a declaration that they remain governed by the Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Almas Vahatuk Va Hamal Sahakari Sanstha, a cooperative labour society that has handled food grain work in Parbhani district since 2005, sought to quash communications and direct the allocation of work to it, alleging that the allocation to another cooperative, Shalimar Vahatuk Va …
The applicant, Dhanraj Shrirang Phad, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking protection from arrest. The Court, after hearing, expressed that it was not inclined to grant any relief. Consequently, the applicant’s counsel, on instructions, …
The applicant Ramesh Abhiman Patil challenged the conviction and sentence imposed for an offence under Section 430 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients, that there was a 13‑day delay in registering the crime, and that no independent …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of first appeals challenging the compensation awarded in land acquisition cases concerning the Nimna Dudhana Project. The appellants argued that the compensation rates should follow a recent decision of the same court, which set the dry‑land …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard multiple first appeals (Nos. 1234‑1238 of 2017) challenging land acquisition awards dated 15‑04‑2015 and 17‑04‑2015. The appellants argued that the compensation rates should follow a recent order of this Court (13‑03‑2026) which fixed the dry‑land rate …
The Central Railway (appellant) challenged a common judgment and award dated 09‑10‑2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line at Rs 4,762 per R, alleging the rate was excessive and the reference court exceeded its jurisdiction. The respondents, a group of landowners from …
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, appealed a common judgment and award dated 09‑10‑2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line in Beed district at Rs. 4,762 per R. The appellants argued that the Reference Court exceeded its …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani, for lands acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project. The Court observed that the controversy was identical to a prior decision (CA/2333/2026) and adopted the same methodology, fixing the …
The appeals (FA Nos. 1234‑1238 of 2017) challenged awards dated 15‑04‑2015 and 17‑04‑2015 made by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Parbhani, in respect of land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project in Salegaon village. The petitioners contended that the compensation rates fixed for their lands were …
Petitioner Shaikh Shakir Abdul Sattar filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 15 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petitioner, through counsel Ajinkya Kale, sought to withdraw the petition. The court noted the request for …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, considered a bail application filed by Vinod Rajaram Damale, accused of abetting the forcible sexual assault of a 12‑year‑old girl under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant physically lifted the …
The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 332/2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR indicated that the informant was initially assaulted by a single person and later by a group, without naming the applicants, and the …
Petitioner Babubee Gorekha Pathan filed a writ petition but failed to appear before the Court on multiple occasions. The Court noted the petitioner's absence during the morning and afternoon sessions on 06.01.2026 and again on 08.01.2026. Despite being given an additional opportunity, the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge that quashed a temporary injunction granted by the trial court in a property dispute concerning the boundaries of Gat Nos. 117 and 118. The trial court had restrained the defendants from constructing on the suit plot …
The Chief Officer Municipal Council, Tuljapur appealed against the award of compensation in Land Acquisition Reference No.139 of 2013, wherein the Joint Civil Judge had determined the amount payable to Shridevi Prakashrao Sarkale and others. The appellant contended that the compensation was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a batch of first appeals challenging the awards of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani, in land acquisition references concerning the Nimna Dudhana Project. The appellants argued that the compensation rates for their lands should be …
The appellants, Dnyaneshwar and Bhagwan Gaddime, were convicted for murder and dowry death under Sections 302 and 498‑A IPC based primarily on two dying declarations of the victim, Mahadevi. The defence argued that the first declaration was recorded 18 hours after admission, was not in the victim's …
The applicants filed several civil applications and revision applications seeking the deletion of certain respondents from the suit and the re‑issuance of notice to other respondents. The court examined the applicants' averments and considered whether such deletions and re‑issuance of notices could …
The applicants filed several civil applications and revision applications seeking the deletion of certain respondents from the suit and the re‑issuance of notice to other respondents. The court examined the applicants' averments and considered whether such deletions and re‑issuance of notices could …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated batch of first appeals filed by numerous claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in land‑acquisition proceedings. The claimants argued that the matters should be referred back to the Reference Court for fresh …
The petitioners, Shyam Murlidhar Salunke, filed bail applications (Nos. 2350 and 2351 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of these applications, the charge sheet was filed against the accused. Counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the pending …
The petitioners, Shyam Murlidhar Salunke, filed two bail applications (Nos. 2351 and 2350 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of these applications, the charge sheet was filed against the accused. Counsel for the applicants sought leave of the court to …
Shivkumar Umakant Swami filed a civil application against Bhagwan Gunderao Jadhav and others. The applicant was represented by Advocate V.V. Bhavthankar, while the respondents were represented by Advocate Siddhesh Deshmukh. The court examined the prayer clause (B) of the application. Finding merit …
The petitioner, a NEET‑2025 qualifier, applied for a stray vacancy round in a government medical college and was placed on the waiting list. He alleged that another candidate (Respondent No.5), who was not on the merit or waiting lists published on 18‑11‑2025 and 19‑11‑2025, was later selected for …
The petitioners, Kajal Hemant Vispute and another, filed writ petition No. 14641 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent Hemant Sudhakar Vispute. The petition was listed for hearing on 18 April 2026, but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the …
The applicants filed a writ petition which was deregistered by the Registrar for failing to remove office objections within the prescribed time. They filed a civil application seeking to set aside the deregistration order, despite a 37‑day delay in filing. The Court condoned the delay, quashed the …
The petitioners challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government Resolution dated 07‑08‑2012 that barred medical officers in government, semi‑government and local self‑government hospitals from engaging in private practice. The High Court noted that a prior judgment in Writ Petition No. 6549 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, upheld the State's and the Maharashtra State Council of Examination's decision to cancel the TET 2018 and 2019 results of the petitioners, finding sufficient evidence of mark‑sheet tampering. It held that the Commissioner of the Council had authority under …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,855‑day delay in filing a petition to bring the legal representatives of a deceased appellant. The court examined the application and heard the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Bhosale Mahesh S. It was observed that the delay was not …
The petitioners claimed that their father, the owner of house No. 238 in Palshi village, was omitted from the list of beneficiaries of an alternative plot under a rehabilitation scheme due to a typographical error, and that plot No. 200 was wrongly allotted to another person. They sought a court …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the District Judge, Jalgaon, to decide a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 85 of 2015) concerning possession of land (Gat No. 708, 90 R) within a specific time. The petition arose from an order dated 28‑Nov‑2016 that had allowed an application preventing …
The petitioner, Nitin Sumatilal Sanghavi, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1912 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rahul R. Awhad, on behalf of Mr. Choudhari N. L., later moved the Court …
Shekhar Dattatraya Hinge filed a writ petition (WP No. 3307 of 2024) and a concurrent civil application (No. 9245 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner obtained the approval he was seeking, rendering the relief sought moot. The petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Farida Begum Afsar Khan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no further cause of action. Consequently, the Court disposed of the …
The petitioner’s writ petition was initially dismissed because court fees had not been paid. However, the petition was assigned legal aid, leading the court to waive the fee objection. The petitioner filed a civil application seeking condonation of the delay in filing the writ petition. The court …
The applicant, Sanjay Chandrakant Varpe, filed a criminal revision (CrR No. 296 of 2017) challenging a conviction. While the revision was pending, the applicant completed the sentence imposed in the original case. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Y.S. Choudhari, argued that since the sentence had been …
The applicants, legal heirs of the deceased Shivappa Tamanappa Ankalkote, filed a civil application seeking to bring their names on record as the sole heirs. The deceased died on 1 November 2023, and the application was filed 657 days later, raising a question of whether the delay could be condoned. …
The applicants, representing the estate of the deceased Shivappa Tamanappa Ankalkote, filed a cross objection in case FA/3153/2011. The Registrar issued a common order on 18‑01‑2022 directing the parties to act within four weeks or face dismissal for default. Due to the death of their earlier …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 15‑day delay and restoration of First Appeal No. 4908 of 2017. The appeal challenged a 2009 judgment and award in a land acquisition case, contending that compensation rates fixed in an earlier decision (Special Land Acquisition …
The petitioners, appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Zilla Parishads and later promoted to Graduate Teacher pay scales, applied for inter‑district transfers. The 24 April 2017 Government Resolution (Clause 3.3) required that such transferred teachers revert to their original Assistant Teacher …
The petitioners, appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Zilla Parishads and later promoted to Graduate Teacher pay scales, applied for inter‑district transfers. The 24‑April‑2017 Government Resolution (Clause 3.3) required them to consent to revert to their original Assistant Teacher posts upon …
Sunita Balaji Javalge filed a first appeal in a civil matter but did so after the prescribed period. She applied to the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking condonation of the delay. The court examined the reasons set out in her application for the delay. Finding the explanations …
The petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner in the Backward Class Cell, was transferred to the post of Deputy Election Officer in Parbhani, but upon arrival the post was found to be non‑vacant, preventing him from joining. He approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal seeking a stay of the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga, which had awarded compensation to Sadu Baliram Lale. The State contended that the compensation exceeded four times the amount granted by the State Legal Aid Office (SLAO) and therefore should be reduced. The …
Manohar Shivaji Patil, a Shikshan Sevak who had cleared both Maha‑TET and CTET, was implicated in a alleged TET examination scam. He filed Writ Petition No.4775 of 2023 and obtained an interim order protecting his salary but withholding any increment until the court’s further direction. The Project …
The petitioner challenged the order dated 28.02.2024 of the Hon'ble Minister, which set aside the Additional Commissioner’s decision on mutation entries of land jointly purchased in 2005. Subsequent sale deeds led to additional mutation entries that the petitioner contested, arguing that the …
The petitioners challenged clauses 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 and 4.7 of a Government Resolution dated 07‑08‑2012 that barred medical officers in government, semi‑government and local self‑government hospitals from engaging in private practice. The High Court noted that a prior judgment in Writ Petition No. 6549 …
The Dr. Zakir Hussain Education Society filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the civil application, proposing to pursue the related writ petition that remained pending. The Court exercised its …
The petitioners, Vandana Vasantrao Ingale and another, filed a writ petition seeking pension under the old pension scheme. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, contended that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan v. State of Maharashtra …
In a criminal matter before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, the petitioner Nafeesa Abdullabhai F. Baquri Siraj Goriwalla filed Criminal Application No. 4490 of 2025 seeking condonation of delay in filing a leave application. The respondent No.2, appearing via video conference, did not …
The petitioner, Sameer Ali Gulam Ali Makrani, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Adv. Rupesh A. Jaiswal, requested the withdrawal of the petition. The …
Petitioner Mohammed Rafiq filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.6 to register an offence for alleged black marketing of food grains and to hand over the investigation to a Special Task Force. The respondents filed an affidavit stating that the Tahsildar had already …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the State of Maharashtra decide on a representation they submitted on 04 September 2025. The High Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to consider the representation on its merits within a reasonable time. The Court held …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the issuance of a mutation entry for a property, arguing it would establish their right. The Court held that a mutation entry is merely a fiscal record and does not confer any right, title, or interest in the land; such substantive rights must be determined by …
The applicant, Kartarsingh Hatyarsingh Tak, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 321/2025 for alleged offences under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act after police seized a vehicle containing weapons and identified him as a passenger. The …
The petitioner, a donor to the Smriti Udyan Yojana, alleged that the forest officials (respondents 3 and 4) abruptly discontinued the scheme, cut down trees, and misappropriated donor funds, seeking an enquiry, criminal prosecution and recovery of monies. The State (respondent 1) and its forest …
Nikita Vikas Bhosle appealed to the Bombay High Court seeking bail in a criminal matter against the State of Maharashtra. The appellant's counsel requested that the bail request be revived if the trial was not concluded within six months. The Court expressed a disinclination to grant any relief at …
Ebix Cash Pvt. Ltd filed an arbitration application against Aurangabad Smart City Development Corporation Limited. The court examined a consent letter and a statement of disclosure dated 28‑08‑2026 submitted by former District and Sessions Judge Shankar G. Shete. The issue was whether the …
The co-operative society filed a suit under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to evict Usman Sayyed Dastgir, which the trial court dismissed. The society appealed, and the appellate court remanded the case back to the trial court to implead a "necessary party" (Dr. Popatlal Kothari) and rehear …
The petitioner, Kisan S/o Mahadev Avhad, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1921 of 2019 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was being heard before a bench comprising Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28‑02‑2019 that recalled arrest warrants issued against the judgment debtors in a civil execution proceeding. The decree in the original suit was undisputed, and the execution court had attached the debtors' immovable property and later …
The applicant, Sunny Patole, filed an application to quash FIR No.442 of 2016 and related charge‑sheet and special case pending before the Sessions Court, which alleged offences under IPC, POCSO Act and the IT Act. The victim, respondent No.2, submitted an affidavit stating she was a minor at the …
In Civil Application No. 853 of 2024, the petitioners Dagadu Harishchandra Rathod and another filed a suit against Daljeet Singh Jogindar Singh and another. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Sushant B. Choudhari, while the first respondent was represented by Mr. Shyam C. Arora. The High Court …
The petitioner, Sanjay Narsingrao Wadikar, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Tukaram Maruti Venjane, informed the court that the order of contempt had been complied with. The court noted that with compliance, there was no …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 507 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioners instituted a fresh suit (RCS No.1083/2023) concerning the same subject matter. The respondents argued that the …
The petitioner, Laximan Digambar Randive, filed a writ petition (933/2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether the petition could still be entertained …
The petition sought to enforce an order directing the Education Officer to approve the appointment of Petitioner No.3, based on vacancy and state policy at the time. The respondent produced a communication dated 03.10.2016 showing that the Education Officer had found no vacancy and refused approval. …
The appellants, Laxmi Ramchandra Dongre and Vitthal Ramchandra Dongre, challenged the award of Rs 2,000 per R by the Reference Court for dry land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project in Salgaon village. They sought a higher rate, invoking escalation benefits recognized in a prior common order …
The appellants, Laxmi Ramchandra Dongre and Vitthal Ramchandra Dongre, challenged the compensation award of Rs 2,000 per R made by the Reference Court for dry land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project in Salgaon village. They relied on a common order dated 18 December 2025 in FA No. 241 of 2022, …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 19‑day delay in filing their first appeal (First Appeal (St.) No.36346 of 2023). The delay was challenged by the State of Maharashtra, represented by the Attorney General. The Court examined the precedent set by the Supreme Court in …
Dilip Tatyabhau Korade filed a bail application (No. 2336 of 2025) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Z.H. Farroqui, informed the court that the bail application had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and held that there was nothing left …
The petitioners, Jayshree and another, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction to transfer the investigations of Crime No. 642 of 2019 (registered at M.I.D.C. Police Station, Ahmednagar) and Crime No. 133 of 2016 (registered at Tophkhana Police Station, Ahmednagar) to the Central …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
A large number of review applications (Civil Nos. 174‑192 of 2026) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and its Department of Urban Development. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the court’s permission to withdraw these applications on the basis of prior …
The petitioner, Pranita Mangesh Lohare, filed a writ petition (No. 11116 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due to …
The petitioner, Dnyaneswar, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the initiation of departmental and criminal proceedings against respondents 3 and 4 and the quashing of an order dated 17 October 2019 issued by the District Collector, Osmanabad, which had found the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Bhoom and …
Ramappa Balasheb Mahajan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later moved the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of filing it had been served. The …
The Union of India, through the Central Railway, acquired land in Ghatsawali village for a new railway line and initially awarded compensation of Rs.1180 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the rate to Rs.4000 per R for Jirayat lands, also granting statutory …
The deceased Aishwarya Sasane alleged that her husband and in‑laws subjected her to physical and mental cruelty over a demand of Rs 4,00,000 for a car and that her mother‑in‑law administered poison, leading to her death. An FIR was lodged under Sections 498‑A, 328, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC, later …
The petitioner, Shravank Damodhar Amrutkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, subsequent developments occurred that rendered the relief sought no longer necessary. Both parties agreed that there was nothing left for the Court …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a batch of first appeals filed by numerous claimants seeking enhanced compensation under land acquisition proceedings. The claimants argued that, like earlier cases, their appeals should be sent back to the Reference Court for fresh adjudication. …
