Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 13001–13200

BHAUSAHEB VITTHAL MOHITEversusMANISHA W/O. DATTATRAYA JADHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Bhausaheb Vitthal Mohite, filed an appeal against an order dated 16 September 2025. The High Court directed that the appellant be served afresh because the matter was transferred to the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The appellant was duly served but failed to appear before the court. …

SURESH DATTATRAY PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Suresk Dattatray Patil, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. After the charge-sheet was filed, he sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh one. The petition raised the procedural question of whether a writ petition …

SAVITA @ SAUBAI SAYAPPA KAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Savita @ Saubai Sayappa Kare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, allowed the withdrawal. …

SAHIL HIRALAL ATTAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioners, Sahil Hiralal Attar and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings in RCC No. 411 of 2024. The charge in the case was framed on 12 May 2026, but the petitioners failed to appear when the matter was called out. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, Mr. S. …

MOHAMAD KACHARODDIN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Mohamad Kacharoddin Pathan, filed an interim application seeking a stay of the conviction and sentence dated 5 January 2023 passed by the Special Judge (ACB) in Solapur. The High Court, recalling its earlier order dated 1 February 2023 which granted bail to the applicants during the …

BHARAT GOPAL HOLKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Special Judge (PC Act) in Karad convicted Bharat Gopal Holkar under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, imposing a one‑year rigorous imprisonment with a Rs.5,000 fine and a concurrent two‑year rigorous imprisonment for the same offence. The …

SANGITA SURESH BODARE AND ORS.versusSANJAY RAMCHANDRA JADHAV AND ORS.

Allowed

The applicants filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in restoring a first appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The court examined whether the delay could be condoned despite procedural lapses. It held that the reasons provided justified …

VISHAKHA VISHWAJIT CHAVANversusVISHWAJIT BIPINCHANDRA CHAVAN

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The Applicant, Vishakha Vishwajit Chavan, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of a marriage petition from the Family Court at Satara to the Family Court at Pune. The application was filed under Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 281 of 2025. The Applicant's counsel, Mr. Balwant …

Kundlik Sambhaji patilversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant sought discharge in a criminal case where the accused was charged under Sections 354 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the discharge application, holding that eye‑witness statements provided sufficient material to frame charges despite the fact …

SEEMA KAILAS SAWANTversusKAILAS SHIVAJI SAWANT

Disposed Off

The applicant, Seema Kailas Sawant, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. Subsequently, through counsel, she sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The Court examined whether a party may be allowed to withdraw a …

DHANANJAY VISHWASRAO BHOITEversusVILAS SANTARAM SARODE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Dhananjay Vishwasrao Bhoite, filed a leave application seeking permission to appeal an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) to argue that the appeal should be …

Musab Irfan NirbadkarversusThe State of Maharashtra

Allowed

The applicant, Musab Irfan Nirbadkar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged sexual intercourse with a 13‑year‑old girl, charged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act, 2012. The prosecution alleged two forced sexual encounters, one in …

MUEEN S/O. MOHD. YUSUF KAZIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Mueen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the order dated 17 January 2025 of the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Pune, which rejected his application for furlough leave. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the order was based on the Maharashtra Prisons …

NILOFAR HAMID METKARI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Several interim applications were filed seeking to join numerous applicants as co‑petitioners in Writ Petition No. 11151 of 2025. The petitioners, represented by Senior Advocate Rajendra Deshmuri, argued that all applicants were identically placed and there was no conflict of interest, thus …

MALLAPPA RAYAPPA MENDIGERIversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, SATARA AND ORS.

TRANSFER TO OTHER COURT AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner, Mallappa Rayappa Mendigeri, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Court, noting an administrative order dated 26 June 2026 that mandates all such petitions be transferred to the Principal Seat at Mumbai, directed that the …

SUKHADEV SOPAN BARIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court of Bombay (Kolhapur Circuit Bench) considered an interim application filed by Sukhdev Sopan Barik seeking suspension of his sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for convictions under IPC sections 302, 201 and 341. The trial court had sentenced him to life …

BASHIR VAJIRBHAI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, heard a writ petition filed by Bashir Vajirbhai Shaikh seeking compliance with a decree dated 09.08.2023. The Court had earlier, on 25.06.2026, directed the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records (DSLR) to implement that decree. The State, through its Government …

Mohsin Akil BurondkarversusThe State of Maharashtra and Another

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mohsin Akil Burondkar, filed Criminal Revision Application No. 354 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. Both parties submitted consent terms dated 24 September 2026, which were signed in the presence of counsel and identified by the court. The counsel …

JAMSHID DASTGIR JAMADAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 2737 of 2023) under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 420, 468 and 34 of the IPC registered as Crime No. 154 of 2023 at Ajara Police Station, Kolhapur. Interim bail was granted by the Court of Session and …

Vaibhav Mohan ChoudhariversusState of Maharashtra

Allowed

The applicants, Vaibhav Mohan Choudhari and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. After the filing of a charge-sheet by the State of Maharashtra, the applicants sought the Court's permission to withdraw their pending application, requesting …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusHANMANT MAHADEO SONWALKAR AND ANR.

Allowed

The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 107‑day delay in filing its appeal (Application for Leave to Appeal). The High Court had previously issued notice to the respondents, who were duly served but failed to appear. The State argued that the delay was justified and …

VAISHALI NITIN ASHTEKAR AND ANRversusRAMESH ANAND SATPUTE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, who purchased a suit land from respondent No.2 in December 2022, challenged an injunction granted by lower courts that restrained them based on concurrent findings of fact that possession lay with the respondents. They argued that they held valid title and that the courts erred in …

SANTOSH VILASRAO YADAV AND ANR.versusSHAILENDRA VILASRAO YADAV AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The Applicants, Santosh Vilasrao Yadav & Anr., filed a Review Petition seeking to set aside a judgment dated 09 June 2025 in Civil Revision Application No. 322 of 2024. They later instructed their counsel to withdraw the Review Petition and instead pursue appropriate proceedings challenging the …

SANTOSH VILASRAO YADAV AND ANR.versusSHAILENDRA VILASRAO YADAV AND ORS.

Allowed

The applicants, Santosh Vilasrao Yadav and anr, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 62‑day delay in filing a review under Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against an order dated 09‑06‑2025 in Civil Revision Application No. 322 of 2024. The respondents, Shailendra …

RAJENDRA BASAVESHWAR MALGEversusLAXMAN ATTYAPPA TALBHADARE AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Rajendra Basaveshwar Malge filed a writ petition challenging the proceedings against him before the High Court of Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The respondents, Laxman Attyappa Talbhadare and others, were parties to the same matter. Both parties' counsel agreed that the related …

VASANT BHAGOJI VHADAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

The petitioner, a senior teacher, was promoted to headmaster in June 2022 with individual approval from the Education Officer, but the approval was cancelled in March 2024 citing an inter‑se dispute among the managing trust factions. The Deputy Director of Education upheld the cancellation, …

DEEPAK LAKSHMAN SUPUGADEversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SATARA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Deepak Lakshman Supugade, filed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition (Stamp) No.15646 of 2024, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution by orders dated 16 August 2024 and 2 September 2024. The court examined whether a dismissed petition could be revived …

Abhay Lalit SuranaversusSumitra Abhay Surana

Dismissed

Petitioner Abhay Lalit Surana filed a contempt petition alleging that Respondents Sumitra Abhay Surana and others willfully disobeyed an order dated 4 August 2025 passed in an appeal against Order No. 444. The order directed that if a disputed amount had not been disbursed, Respondents 2 and 3 were …

SONALI MADHUKAR DHUTUREversusTHE STATE MAHRASHTRA THR. SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, teachers, filed writ petitions seeking direction to the Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of their respective Zilla Parishads to decide pending representations concerning a government scheme that allows husband and wife teachers to be posted at the same station or within 30 km. They …

PRATAPSINGH LALASO DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Pratapsingh Lalaso Deshmukh, was implicated in FIR No. 509 of 2023 for alleged forgery and fraud in securing a police constable post, charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with section 34. He contended that he was not the same person named in the charge sheet (P.L. …

DR. GANESH HARIBHAU HOLversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed Off

Dr. Ganesh Haribhau Hol filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashment of FIR No. 216 of 2025 and the charge‑sheet filed for alleged offences under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued that the …

SUNIL NARAYAN TEGNINAMNIversusDILIP SADASHIVRAO DESAI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sunil Narayan Tegninamni, filed criminal appeals (Nos. 834 and 836 of 2014) against respondents Dilip Sadashivrao Desai and others. The appellant and his counsel were absent when the matter was called, while the respondent's counsel, Mr. Kaustubh Rayrikar, and the State's APP, Mr. C. …

SUNIL NARAYAN TEGNINAMNIversusDILIP SADASHIVRAO DESAI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sunil Narayan Tegninamni, was absent from the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 835 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. Counsel for the respondents cited the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to argue that …

SUNIL NARAYAN TEGNINAMNIversusDILIP SADASHIVRAO DESAI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sunil Narayan Tegninamni, filed criminal appeals (Nos. 834 and 836 of 2014) against respondents Dilip Sadashivrao Desai and others. The appellant and his counsel were absent when the matter was called, while the respondent's counsel, Mr. Kaustubh Rayrikar, and the State's APP, Mr. C. …

APPASAHEB BIRUNAGI PANDITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Appasaheb Birunagi Pandit, challenged the Caste Scrutiny Committee’s order that invalidated his caste certificate on the ground that his family originated from Bijapur, now in Karnataka. He argued that his family’s roots lie in the old Bombay State before the Bombay Reorganisation …

SHRI.SURESH GANPATI POTDARversusSHRI.PANDURANG RAMCHANDRA PATIL JADHAV

Disposed Off

The appellant, Shri Suresh Ganpati Potdar, filed a second appeal against Shri Pandurang Ramchandra Patil Jadhav. The appellant's counsel, Advocate Paraswi Deodhar, was given an opportunity but failed to file a Vakalatnama. The court considered whether the appeal could continue without the required …

LAXMAN SAVALA CHAVAREversusSANTOSH PRALHAD SUTAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant Laxman Savala Chavare filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court. Both parties, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision (Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, 2025), argued that the matter should be heard by the Sessions Court having jurisdiction. The High Court, after …

AISHWARYA SUNIL BUJAREversusSUNIL ANANDRAO BUJARE

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aishwarya Sunil Bujare, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, relating to a matrimonial dispute with the respondent, Sunil Anandrao Bujare. The applicant’s counsel submitted that the dispute had been amicably settled and …

TEJAL YASH BOHARAversusYASH ANIL BOHARA

Disposed Off

The wife (applicant) filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed by her husband from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ichalkaranji to the Family Court at Ahmednagar, invoking her severe medical condition (heterozygous pathogenic variants in GNC gene …

ATMARAM GANPATI HULWAN AND ORS.versusNIVAS BANDU HULWAN AND ANR.

Dismissed

The petitioners, heirs of Ganpati Hulwan, claimed co‑ownership of a 42‑R land parcel (Gat No. 2067) purchased jointly with the respondents' father in 1986 and alleged that a 2004 family partition allotted them the western half. The respondents contended that Ganpati never paid his share, that the …

VIJAY LAHU PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Petitioner Vijay Lahu Patil filed three criminal writ petitions (Nos. 4332, 4334, 4365 of 2022) before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the accused in the underlying criminal case had been acquitted. On that …

PINTYA @ SACHIN LAXMAN DUPATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellant, Pintya @ Sachin Laxman Dupate, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on the testimony of an 11‑year‑old girl, Pranita Dupate, and on forensic evidence that the High Court found unreliable. On appeal under Section 415 of the Bharatiya …

PINTYA @ SACHIN LAXMAN DUPATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Pintya @ Sachin Laxman Dupate, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC based primarily on the testimony of an 11‑year‑old child witness, Pranita Dupate, and on forensic evidence that the High Court found unreliable. The appeal under Section 415 of the …

SULEMAN MAHAMAD DARAWAJKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Suleman Mahamad Darawajka, filed Interim Application No. 3533 of 2023 seeking to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2737 of 2023. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Dhananjay Utture, argued for permission to be added as an intervenor, while the State’s counsel, Mr. S. H. Yadav, …

SUGRIV ANANDRAO KALE AND ORS.versusPUSHPA PANDURANG MASAL @ PATIL AND ANR.

Allowed

The petitioners, original defendants, challenged a district court order that had imposed an injunction on their possession of land allotted as Gat No.120/5 in Katewadi, Solapur. Both parties claimed ownership of overlapping parcels, with the petitioners asserting that the land lay on the northern …

SANTOSH DATTATRAY BHINGARE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, four brothers, challenged two-year externment orders issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune and the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Solapur, which barred them from Solapur and Dharashiv districts. They argued that the authorities did not apply their mind, failed to record …

KHAJAPPA PARASAPPA AARENAVRU AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Khajappa Parasappa Aarenavru and others, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The trial of the underlying criminal matter had progressed to the stage of judgment pronouncement. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Onkar Arun Mane, informed the court that they …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER M.S.E.D.C LTD.versusSHRI. HARIDAS SANGRAM GAVHANE

Dismissed

The appellant, Executive Engineer MSEDCL Ltd., appealed against a compensation award of Rs. 8,61,120 with 12% interest made by the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation and the Labour Court. The appellant argued that the deceased employee's monthly salary was Rs. 6,000, not Rs. 8,000 as recorded, …

RAJENDRA DADOBA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Shri Sahebrao Subrao Shelke, a tax consultant, was arrested in connection with a large-scale investment fraud allegedly perpetrated by A.S. Traders and its subsidiaries, and charged under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 read with 34 and MPID Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant contended he was merely an …

SHAMSUDDIN MAHMULAL PATHANversusYASHWANT MARUTI KANTHODE

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shamsuddin Mahmulal Pathan, filed a contempt petition (No. 84 of 2026) arising from the order passed in Writ Petition No. 9140 of 2004 dated 26 September 2024. The respondent, Yashwant Maruti Kanhode, was alleged to have failed to comply with that order. The respondent's counsel …

YOGESH NIWASRAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Petitioner Yogesh Niwasrao Jadhav filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Respondent State, through its Additional Public Prosecutor S. V. Gavand, informed the Court that a "Summary Report" had been …

VIJAYA @ NISHA SADASHIV JADHAV AND ORS.versusSAMPAT SARJERAO JADHAV AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants filed an appeal but missed the prescribed time limit by eleven days. They subsequently moved an interim application seeking condonation of this delay. The Court examined the reasons provided in the application for the tardiness. Finding the explanations satisfactory, the Court decided …

VITTHAL LAXMAN PATILversusAPPASAHEB RAMCHANDRA PATIL

Allowed

The applicants, Vitthal Laxman Patil and others, filed a second appeal (Stamp No. 29245 of 2025) but delayed filing it by 125 days. They moved an interim application seeking condonation of this delay. The learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Ankita Chindage, requested that a spare copy of the …

NITIN KESHAV WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Allowed

The applicant, Nitin Keshav Waghmare, was arrested for kidnapping a minor and establishing physical relations with her, alleged under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was lodged on 22 November 2024 and the applicant was detained on 1 June 2025. The charge‑sheet has been …

SUSHMA SHANKAR PARKAR AND ORS.versusSHALINI HANUMANTRAO BORADE AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants filed a criminal revision application and later instructed their counsel to withdraw it. The court considered the request to withdraw the pending revision. No substantive issues were argued as the application was merely withdrawn. The court accordingly disposed of the revision …

FIROZ NARUDDIN KAZIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The Court entertained a motion to correct a clerical error in the anticipatory bail application where the Criminal Revision (C.R.) number was incorrectly stated as 498 of 2025 instead of 497 of 2025. The petitioner sought substitution of the wrong number and amendment of the prayer clause. The Court …

NAGNATH HANMANT BALWANTRAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a June 2022 order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his caste certificate as a member of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. He argued that the Committee ignored a 1934 birth entry of his paternal aunt showing the caste as Mahadev Koli, which was certified …

KALPANA ATUL PAWARversusATUL SUBHASH PAWAR

Disposed Off

Kalpana Atul Pawar appealed to the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, against Atul Subhash Pawar in a family court matter. Both parties filed consent terms dated 5 October 2026, indicating they had amicably settled their dispute and were residing together for the past three months. The …

SURESH DHONDIRAM BHONGALEversusRANJANA VIJAY GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER

Disposed Off

The appellant, Suresh Dhondiram Bhongale, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against respondents Ranjana Vijay Gaikwad and another. The appellant's counsel, citing the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), argued that the …

SHRI DIGAMBAR VITHOBA KAMBLE AND ANRversusSHRI BAPU SADHU KAMBLE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a judgment dated 14 August 2015 of the District Judge, Sangli, which had rejected their application for a stay in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014. The order had been in force for more than eleven years without any further hearing. The High Court examined whether it was …

SHRI DIGAMBAR VITHOBA KAMBLE AND ANRversusSHRI BAPU SADHU KAMBLE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a judgment dated 14 August 2015 of the District Judge, Sangli, which had rejected their application for a stay in Regular Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2014. The order had been in force for more than eleven years without any further hearing. The High Court examined whether it was …

MOHANLAL KANWARLAL VAIDversusASAVARI AVINASH DESHPANDE AND ANR.

Allowed

The appellant, Mohanlal Kanwarlal Vaid, filed an application seeking leave to withdraw his criminal appeal after a judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Ghanasekaran. He also requested permission to initiate appropriate proceedings before the Sessions Judge. The Court considered the time taken by …

PREETAM GANPATI PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Preetam Ganpati Patil was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for murder (IPC s.302), attempt to murder (IPC s.201) and criminal intimidation (IPC s.452), each under section 235(2) of the CrPC, and sentenced to life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonment terms. The prosecution’s …

SIDDHANT BHAGWAN PARABversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Siddhant Bhagwan Parab, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No.252 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegations stem from a disputed property transaction where the …

DILIP GUNDA SATHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Dilip Gunda Sathe, was charged with assault and homicide under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following a complaint that he and co‑accused attacked the complainant and others with sticks, stones and other weapons, resulting in the death of Sachin Kamble. The …

VANITA ARJUN PATILversusKRUSHNA RAU KURANE AND ANR.

Dismissed as Withdrawn

The applicant, Vinita Arjun Patil, filed Civil Revision Application No. 434 of 2025 seeking to quash the order dated 03/07/2025 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur, in Special Civil Suit No. 438/2023 and to have the suit dismissed with costs. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Himanshu …

SHEETALKUMAR SUDHAKAR MANEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The petitioner, Sheetalkumar Manere, challenged a July 2025 order of a Judicial Magistrate that directed further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Cr.P.C. against him and Mahesh Oza, based on an application filed by the complainant, Sanjay Ghodawat. The court examined whether a proposed …

Dattatraya Narayan DeshmukhversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant, Dattatraya Narayan Deshmukh, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging a decision of the lower court in a criminal matter against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the court expressed reluctance to entertain …

KALPANA ATUL PAWARversusATUL SUBHASH PAWAR

Disposed Off

Kalpana Atul Pawar appealed to the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, against Atul Subhash Pawar in a family court matter. Both parties filed consent terms dated 5 October 2026, indicating they had amicably settled their dispute and were residing together for the past three months. The …

BALU AKARAM VARNEversusTHE CEO OF NAGARPARISHAD ASHTA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Balu Akaram Varne filed a writ petition challenging the order that rejected his proposal for regularisation by the CEO of Nagarparishad Astha. The Court examined whether the petition could be entertained in view of the existence of an alternate statutory remedy to appeal the order. It observed that …

ABHIJEET BALU BURANGEversusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2 PANDHARPUR

TRANSFER TO OTHER COURT AT ADMISSION STAGE

Petitioner Abhijeet Balu Burange filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the Income Tax Officer, Ward‑2, Pandharpur and others. The petition was listed before a two‑judge bench comprising Justices M.S. Karnik and Ajit B. Kadethankar. Counsel …

SANDHYA ANAND MAHINDAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY AND ORS.

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …

VINOD SHIVAJI BOBADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an interim application under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to suspend the life sentences imposed on Vinod Shivaji Bobade for raping his step‑daughter and related offences. The conviction covered offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section 5(n) r/w Section …

ANKUSH RAM BIDKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Ankush Ram Bidkar, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide, criminal conspiracy, extortion and offences under the Maharashtra Money Lending Act. The trial court had earlier granted interim bail to the applicant's wife but conditioned the applicant to …

VRUSHALI RAKESH MOREversusRAKESH BHIMRAO MORE

Allowed

The applicant, Vrushali Rakesh More, a resident of Hupari in Kolhapur district, filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking the transfer of the Hindu Marriage Petition No. 237 of 2023, originally filed in Vita, Sangli, to the Civil Judge’s court at …

YASHWANT ESHWAR SARNAIK AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, original owners of several parcels of land, had filed returns under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and the lands were declared surplus with a notice under Section 10(5) for surrender. The notice was challenged and stayed in 1985, leading the High Court to order …

RAM KISAN SATHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay, Kolhapur Bench, heard applications for anticipatory bail filed by Ram Kisan Sathe (ABA No. 2394 of 2025) and Ravi Prakash Sonawane (ABA No. 2395 of 2025). The applicants argued that the court had already disposed of Sathe's application and that the second application should …

VAIBHAV KRUSHNAT PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Vaibhav Krushnat Patil, was charged under Sections 420, 406 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly cheating an informant by taking large sums of money as investment and failing to return them. The informant lodged a complaint in March 2025, leading to the registration of …

YOGESH NAGNATH PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

Petitioner Yogesh Nagnath Pawar filed a criminal writ petition challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order that upheld the rejection of his discharge application in a 2016 criminal case. The petitioner argued that CCTV footage either did not show his presence or, if it did, it was at a time …

AMRUTA VIJAY KHORATversusVIJAY SHRAVAN KHORAT

Disposed Off

The wife (Applicant) sought transfer of a divorce petition filed by her husband (Respondent) from the Civil Judge Senior Division Court at Gadhinglaj to the Court at Karad, citing the distance of 136 km and her residence with her mother and minor son in Karad. Mediation between the parties was …

MARUTI VITTHAL KULKARNI,versusSIDHOJIRAO DADASO CHAVAN AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Maruti Vitthal Kulkarni filed a writ petition and a related civil application against respondents Sidhojirao Dadaso Chavan and others. The parties appeared before the court and presented a notarized Consent Terms dated 30 June 2025, a Power of Attorney, and a No Dues Certificate from …

RANJAN BHAUSAHEB DOMBEversusMAHESH DEVIDAS SATHE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The applicant, originally Defendant No.1, filed a revision challenging the trial court's dismissal of his request to frame a limitation issue as a preliminary matter in Civil Suit No. 61 of 2021. The applicant subsequently withdrew the request for a preliminary determination, seeking instead that …

DATTATRAY RAJARAM JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY AND ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Dattatray Rajaram Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no …

ASHTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSHRI. PRADIP NANASAHEB PATIL AND ANR.

Allowed

The Ashta Municipal Corporation filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24 June 2014 that rejected its application for condonation of a two‑year‑two‑month delay in seeking restoration of a suit for recovery of Rs. 95,676. The suit, filed against contractors for non‑remittance of octroi …

Kshitija Shashank KusalkarversusShashank Arvind Kusalkar

Disposed Off

In a family court appeal (No. 95 of 2025) concerning the matrimonial dispute between Kshitija Shashank Kusalkar (wife) and Shashank Arvind Kusalkar (husband), the parties submitted a mutually agreed Consent Terms on 24 August 2026. The terms stipulated that the wife would return 14 tolas of gold to …

Kshitija Shashank KusalkarversusShashank Arvind Kusalkar

Disposed Off

In a family court appeal (No. 95 of 2025) concerning the matrimonial dispute between Kshitija Shashank Kusalkar (wife) and Shashank Arvind Kusalkar (husband), the parties submitted a mutually agreed Consent Terms on 24 August 2026. The terms stipulated that the wife would return 14 tolas of gold to …

SUYOG GAJANAN AUNDHKARversusPOLICE INSPECTOR ISLAMPUR AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Suyog Gajanan Aundhkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Police Inspector, Islampur, and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, without addressing any …

SHRIPAD GOPAL VYAS AND ANR.versusDATTATRAY DEO. MATH. KARVEER KOLHAPUR AND ORS.

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, exercising its inherent powers, granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the …

DIPAK MOHAN BHAT AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Dipak Mohan Bhat and another, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC for alleged offences including rioting, robbery and assault under various IPC sections. They argued that there was an inordinate delay in lodging the FIR and that the investigation was already …

Aishwarya Shrikant KadamversusShrikant Dattatray Kadam

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aishwarya Shrikant Kadam, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of a marriage petition. The respondent, Shrikant Dattatray Kadam, subsequently withdrew the marriage petition. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the underlying petition was withdrawn, …

PRITI WILSON SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Priti Wilson Shinde, the wife of a main accused in a financial fraud case, applied for anticipatory bail under sections 318(4), 316(5), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. She had …

ARCHANA RAJESH DESAIversusRAJESH RAVSHAHEB DESAI

Allowed

The applicant, a homemaker residing in Sangli with a minor child, filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. A‑45 of 2024 from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan (Thane) to the Family Court, Sangli. …

ANANDRAO LAHU PATIL AND ANR.versusSHIVSAGAR RAMAYYA SWAMI

Rejected

The plaintiff, Shivsagar Ramayya Swami, filed a suit seeking declaration, cancellation of a sale deed dated 21‑10‑2021 and a permanent injunction. The defendants, Anandrao Lahu Patil and others, moved an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC alleging that the plaintiff had paid …

Deepak Tukaram MohiteversusRekha Deepak Mohite

Disposed Off

The Family Court, Satara, ordered the husband to pay Rs 6,000 per month as maintenance to his wife from June 2023. Both parties appealed, and the High Court examined the husband’s net salary of Rs 45,076 and Supreme Court precedents that endorse 25% of net earnings as a just maintenance amount. The …

SANTOSH NAMDEV JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Santosh Namdev Jadhav applied for anticipatory bail after a complaint alleged that, as an official linked to the Mayor of Khed Municipal Council, he failed to maintain vehicle logbooks and facilitated the misuse of diesel fuel allowance, leading to charges under IPC sections 409, 420, 465, 468 and …

Ramesh Nagnath KadamversusThe State Of Maharashtra

Rejected

The applicant, a sitting MLA, filed a criminal revision under Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging the rejection of his discharge application in a case involving offences under Sections 353, 341, 342, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He argued that the discharge …

PRAMOD LAXMAN WASTEversusRATANCHAND SHAH SAHKARI BANK LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Pramod Laxman Waste, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17 February 2024 issued under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, a possession notice dated 16 March 2024, and the subsequent auction proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the records …

SHUBHADA SUBHASH SHAH AND ORSversusPRASHANT GAURISHANAKAR RAJMANE AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioners, office bearers of Vidya Vikas Mandal, challenged an order of the University and College Tribunal that imposed a fine of Rs 1,00,000 on them under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, for non‑compliance with the Tribunal’s directions to reinstate a former …

SHIVAJI KRISHNATH PATILversusSantosh Kumar Yadav

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shivaji Krishnath Patil, filed a contempt petition alleging that the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) had not complied with a court order to deposit compensation. The High Court, after hearing submissions, noted that on 20 July 2026 it had directed NHAI to deposit the …

DIVYA RAJESH REVANKAR AND OTHERSversusNAGESH VYANKATRAMAN REVANKAR AND OTHERS

Dismissed as Withdrawn

The petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition and obtain liberty to file a statutory appeal under Section 29 of the P.W.D.V. Act, 2005 against an order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ichalkaranji. The respondents argued that the petition was filed beyond the limitation period for …

RAMHARI JAGANNATH PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, heard a bail application where the order dated 2 February 2026 incorrectly mentioned "Sangli Police Station" instead of "Sangli City Police Station." The court corrected this clerical error throughout the document. No substantive legal issues were …

DILIP NATHU KANK AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, five individuals claiming to be project‑affected persons, filed a writ petition in 2021 seeking execution of an order dated 11 August 2000 that allegedly allotted them land under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. The petition was filed …

KIRANARAJ PURUSHOTTAM GHODAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Kiranaraj Purushottam Ghodake, filed a criminal writ petition seeking relief. After the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioner moved the court for leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be …

RAIBAI GANU PATILversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, KOLHAPUR AND ORS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Raibai Ganu Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The petitioner’s counsel later sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as …

BALU AMBRUSHI BAGALEversusSTATE OF MAHA. THR. COLLECTOR OF SOLAPOUR AND ORS

Allowed

A group of petitioners sought a direction for the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to pay compensation determined by awards under Section 28A(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, based on enhanced compensation awarded in Land Acquisition Reference No. 23 of 2003. The original award under …

RAHUL RAGHUNATH GHOGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Rahul R. Ghogare, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Cr. No. 772 of 2025) alleging outraging the modesty of a female informant, with the prosecution alleging an extra‑marital relationship supported by call detail records. The trial court, after hearing counsel, ordered that if …

ROHIT RAMESH THORATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Rejected

The appellant, convicted under multiple IPC sections and the POCSO Act for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 15‑year‑old girl, sought bail and suspension of his sentence. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, a married man, lured the minor to a lodge, sexually assaulted her, and left bite …

GANESH CHANDRAKANT BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ganesh Chandrakant Bhosale, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a fraud case (Crime No.804 of 2025) involving alleged cheating of Rs.5,55,000 under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that Bhosale, along with co‑accused, conspired to obtain a loan of …

AMIT NAMDEV PHAKADEversusRUPALI AMIT PHAKADE

Disposed Off

The petition stems from a Hindu marriage dated 2014 that produced a daughter. The husband (petitioner) lost his job during the COVID-19 pandemic and moved to Miraj, while the wife (respondent) continued working in Pune. The wife filed for divorce and both parties applied for interim maintenance; the …

KUNAL SURESH MESTRIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Kunal Suresh Mestri, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR alleging cheating investors in a financial scheme, under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. The prosecution argued that Mestri was a …

SURAJ ANKUSH AVGHADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The applicant, Suraj Ankush Avghade, had been granted ad‑interim relief and temporary bail by an order dated 30 September 2024. The applicant’s counsel affirmed that the bail remained in force, and the respondents did not contest this statement. The Court noted that the interim order had been …

MARYAN ALES MANTERversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Maryan Ales Manter, filed a criminal application seeking leave to withdraw the pending application in view of filing a charge-sheet, requesting liberty to file a fresh application if advised. The learned counsel submitted the request on 7 August 2026. The Court examined whether the …

Rupali Sandip PatsupeversusSandip Gopal Patsupe

Disposed Off

The applicant, a homemaker with a minor child and no income, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking transfer of Marriage Petition No. 1564 of 2025 from the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Kalyan to a court in Kolhapur, citing extreme inconvenience and financial …

JITENDRA KUMAR MAHAVEER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Jitendra Kumar Mahaveer Singh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. While the application was pending, he was arrested, which rendered the cause of action for anticipatory bail moot. The court noted that once the applicant is in custody, the purpose of anticipatory …

NETRA DYANESHWAR GIRMEversusDYANESHWAR ANKUSH GIRME

Allowed

The wife, Netra Dyaneshwar Girme, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of the divorce petition filed by her husband, Dyaneshwar Ankush Girme, from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara to the Family Court at Pune. She argued that she resides in Pune with two school‑going …

RAMCHANDRA POPAT SATAVversusDATTATRAY GANPAT SATAV AND ORS

Allowed

Ramchandra Popat Satav, the owner of land Gat No. 630/2 in Solapur, filed a regular civil suit seeking perpetual and temporary injunctions against Dattatray Ganpat Satav and others for alleged obstruction of his cultivation. The respondents claimed a 12‑foot customary road on the western side of the …

SUNIL LAXMANDAS NARSINGHANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Partly Allowed

The applicant, Sunil Laxmandas Narsinghani, sought transfer of a Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) application (No. 125 of 2022) and a related appeal (No. 35 of 2024) from the 5th JMFC Court and Additional Sessions Judge in Sangli to the corresponding courts in Kolhapur, arguing …

DATTATRAY DAGADU KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Petitioner Dattatray Dagadu Kamble filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quash of an order dated 29/09/2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Revision Application No. 6/2024. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Anand S. Patil, requested a short recess to take …

RADHIKA KIRAN JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Radhika Kiran Jadhav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with Crime No.841 of 2024 involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed the bail, but the investigating officer …

RAMAKANT LAXMANT GAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Ramakant Laxman Gawade, sought to have FIR No. 28 of 2025 and the accompanying chargesheet quashed, alleging that the FIR was filed malafidely due to an existing family dispute. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 74, 75(2), 333, 351(2) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, …

AAKASHANK BALKRUSHNA CHANDANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Aashank Balkrushna Chandane was implicated in FIR No. 733 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, relating to a claim that a 2006 Non‑Agricultural (N.A.) order was fabricated. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting ownership of the land and that the dispute …

SHANKAR KONDIBA CHIKANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shankar Kondiba Chikane, filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra alleging that his cattle died due to an attack by a wild animal. The Collector of Forest submitted a report stating that the cattle died from a broken jaw, not from a wild‑animal attack, creating a …

DR BHARAT BAJARANG BALLALversusTHE VICE CHANCELLOR AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Bharat Bajarang Ballal challenged an order dated 07.02.2026 passed by the Grievance Committee of Shivaji University, claiming it to be an appealable order before the University Tribunal. The High Court observed that an equally effective remedy exists in filing a statutory appeal before …

SUNIL SHAMRAO CHOUGULE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants sought to quash FIR No.1 of 2025 and the charge‑sheet filed under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the deceased had not been harassed by them and that there was …

AKASH PRAKASH LONDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Akash Prakash Londhe, sought a Project Affected Certificate for land in Gat Nos. 12 and 13 that had been acquired for the Ujjani Left Bank Project. The land had been re‑granted as watan land to his grandfather, whose name was later entered in the revenue records via Mutation Entry …

SOMNATH JAYSING KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioner, Somnath Jaysing Kadam, filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition after a charge-sheet had been filed, and to file a fresh petition incorporating the charge-sheet. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s leave to …

SHRI. PRAVIN BABAN NARALEversusSHRI. YOGESH BABAN JADHAV

Allowed

The applicants filed an interim application in a second appeal seeking to implead Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, who are subsequent purchasers of the suit property, as parties to the appeal. The counsel argued that under Order I Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, such parties could be added. The court …

CERAFLUX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, THR. ITS DIRECTOR.versusSUNIL DIPAK PATIL

Dismissed

Ceraflux India Private Limited terminated a permanent employee, Sunil Dipak Patil, without complying with the procedural safeguards mandated by the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 and the Maharashtra Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) …

ROHIDAS DAYANAND KAMBLE AND ANR.versusDHONDIRAM SAHDEV KAMBLE AND ORS.

Dismissed

The petitioners, Rohidas Dayanand Kamble & Anr., filed a writ petition challenging an interlocutory order dated 07.10.2008 that rejected their Section 28 application raising a preliminary objection to the maintainability of Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2023. They contended that the appeal …

INDUBAI ANNA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Intervenor, Indubai Anna Patil, an 88‑year‑old complainant in an FIR alleging cheating by her brother and nephew, filed an interim application seeking permission to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2341 of 2023 filed by Arun Shankar Patil and others. The Applicants opposed the …

NARENDRA MANIK BHOSALEversusUDDHAV MURALIDHAR CHAVAN AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Narendra Manik Bhosale, was absent along with his counsel when the appeal was called. The State’s counsel, Dr. A. A. Takalkar, relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to argue that the matter should be before a …

M/S. N. I. PLAST INDIAversusM/S. MULTIMEDIA ENTERPRISES AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, heard Criminal Appeal No. 1511 of 2011 where the appellant, M/s. N. I. Plast India, was absent along with its counsel. The respondent State, represented by Mr. Chandrakant D. Mali, relied on the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …