Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 13201–13400

DAGDU GUNDU KAMBLE AND ORS.versusPRIYANKA PRADIP KAMBLE AND ANR.

Dismissed as Withdrawn

The matter concerned a criminal application filed by Dagdu Gundu Kamble and others against Priyanka Pradip Kamble and others. During the hearing, Respondent No. 1 indicated that he would withdraw the criminal proceedings pending against Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 before the trial court and gave an …

M/S. ARATI COMPANYversusRAM GURAPPA MHETRE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, M/s. Arati Company, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court. Both parties cited the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) and argued that the matter should be heard by the Sessions Court having jurisdiction. The High Court, after …

INDRAJEET ALIAS AJAY ANANDA KUMBHARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicant, Indrajeet alias Ajay Ananda Kumbhar, sought bail in a case involving charges of rape, sexual assault, criminal intimidation and offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The prosecution alleged that between January 2020 and March 2021 the accused …

LAXMAN VISHNU SARGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.,

Allowed

The High Court considered an interim application filed by Laxman Vishnu Sargar, who had been convicted in a Special POCSO case for offences under Sections 354A(1)(ii), 354B read with 506 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(w)(ii) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, with a three‑year …

UTTAM RAJARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

TRANSFER TO OTHER COURT AT ADMISSION STAGE

Uttam Rajaram Patil filed a writ petition (No. 1639 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition sought relief against respondents numbered 2 and 3, who are located within the jurisdiction of the Principal Seat of …

YOGESH GORAKHNATH SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Yogesh Gorakhnath Shinde, filed an interim application seeking to allow the original complainant (intervenor) to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2832 of 2023. Neither the applicant nor his counsel appeared in court despite the case being listed as a prioritized matter. …

APPARAO GOPALRAO KOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

ABATED

The petitioner, Apparao Gopalrao Kore, filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking an order for the registration of a crime. The petition remained uncirculated and was not listed before the Court for several years. The Court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to advance the matter despite …

SHITAL SAGAR KOKAREversusSAGAR VITHAL KOKARE

Allowed

The applicant, Shital Sagar Kokare, sought transfer of a Hindu marriage petition (No. A‑2970 of 2024) filed by her husband and pending before the Family Court in Bandra, Mumbai, to the Family Court in Sangli, where she resides. The application was filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil …

ANITA DEVENDRA KAMBLEversusDEVENDARA GULABRAO KAMBLE

Allowed

The applicant filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking clarification on the procedural steps for restoring a marriage petition (No. 292 of 2021) that had been dismissed for default on 31 December 2025. The respondent indicated an intention to file a restoration application and sought guidance …

THE GODAVARI SUGAR MILLS LTDversusSURESH BABURAO BIRANJE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, heard Criminal Appeal No. 1532 of 2011 filed by Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd against Suresh Baburao Biranje and others. The appellant was not present, while the respondents’ counsel relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …

DIPAK AKARAM GHADAGE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicants, Dipak Akaram Ghadage and Viru Deepak Ghadage, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with CR No.81 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 376(2)(f) and 504 r/w 34. An interim bail was earlier granted in ABA No.2313 with several …

PRASHANT VASANTRAO DESHMUKHversusAMRUTA PRASHANT DESHMUKH

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Prashant Vasantrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition (No. 11969 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Kalpesh Patil, submitted a settlement document marked as Exhibit X, indicating that the parties had reached an …

VISHWANATH PANDURANG DALVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Vishwanath Pandurang Dalvi and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging a complaint pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) in Mandangad. Respondent No. 2, through counsel, undertook to withdraw the complaint, and consequently the petitioner's counsel …

ATUL LINGAPPA KAMBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellant, Atul Lingappa Kamble, was named in a suicide note of a deceased who alleged harassment over loan repayments and caste-based abuse, leading to charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The …

NIKHIL JAYWANT KATRATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Nikhil Jaywant Katrat, sought a compassionate appointment as Lab Attendant/Peon/Clerk after his father, a government employee, retired on medical grounds and died three and a half months later. The Director of Education rejected the application citing the Government Resolution dated …

SUNIL NARHARI BALUGADE AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Sunil Narhari Balugade and another, filed a writ petition challenging certain proceedings. The petitioners later sought permission to withdraw the petition after a chargesheet was filed, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with the chargesheet attached. The learned counsel …

ANNASAHEB KALLAPPA UPADHYE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Popat Ramchandra Durge filed a writ petition (No. 222 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, which was later joined by an intervenor application filed by Mr. Kuldeep Nikam. The intervenor sought to be allowed to withdraw his appearance, and the petitioner subsequently …

LAXMI AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSATISH RAVINDRA LAVATE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, heard Criminal Appeals Nos. 1540 and 1541 of 2011 filed by Laxmi Auto Services Private Limited against Satish Ravindra Lavate and others. Neither the appellant nor the appellant's counsel appeared, while the State was represented by Mr. C. D. Mali. …

LAXMI AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSATISH RAVINDRA LAVATE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, heard Criminal Appeals Nos. 1540 and 1541 of 2011 filed by Laxmi Auto Services Private Limited against Satish Ravindra Lavate and others. Neither the appellant nor the appellant's counsel appeared, while the State was represented by Mr. C. D. Mali. …

MUKESH RAJU SATAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Mukesh Raju Satam was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for murder under Section 302 IPC and for dacoity‑related offences under Sections 394 and 397 IPC, receiving life imprisonment and a term of rigorous imprisonment respectively. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the …

AJINATH NAGNATH WAGHMODEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ajinath Nagnath Waghmode, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. Subsequently, the charge-sheet in the case was filed, prompting the applicant to seek liberty to withdraw his bail application. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted a …

Visnu Dattu KhuleversusState of Maharashtra Through Public Prosecutor

Rejected

The accused, Visnu Dattu Khule, obtained a loan of Rs.50 lakh from a bank and issued a cheque for Rs.12 lakh which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The bank served a statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and upon non‑payment, filed a complaint leading to the …

Vishnu Dattu KhuleversusState of Maharashtra Through Public Prosecutor

Disposed Off

The accused, Visnu Dattu Khule, obtained a loan of Rs.50 lakh from a bank and issued a cheque for Rs.12 lakh which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The bank served a statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and upon non‑payment, filed a complaint leading to the …

OM RAHUL NIKAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Om Rahul Nikam, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4(25) of the Arms Act, relating to the murder of Akshay Mane. The FIR initially did not name the applicant, but a later witness statement under Section …

SONU ALIAS ONKAR BIRA PUKALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sonu alias Onkar Bira Pukale, was charged with murder, conspiracy, and several other offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. He has been in custody since December 9, 2018, and the charge‑sheet has been filed but no …

PANKAJ BHASKAR PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants Pankaj Bhaskar Pawar and Nitin Baburao Dhone sought bail in Crime No.690 of 2025 registered at Mohol Police Station, Solapur Rural, for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The prosecution alleged that on secret information, …

PRAVINCHANDRA MANILAL SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Pravinchandra Manilal Shah, sought relaxation of condition No. 7(iii) of the anticipatory bail order dated 30‑03‑2022, which required surrender of his passport to the investigating officer. He submitted an affidavit and medical documents showing his daughter’s cancer treatment in the …

CHITRALEKHA TUKARAM KAMBLEversusSHRI. BHASKAR TUKARAM KAMBLE AND ORS

Allowed

The Court examined several interim applications filed in Writ Petition No. 7335 of 2011. It held that effective service of notice was made on respondents No. 4 and 7 under Order V Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, obviating the need for substituted service. The Court also found valid service …

CHITRALEKHA TUKARAM KAMBLEversusSHRI. BHASKAR TUKARAM KAMBLE AND ORS

Allowed

The Court examined several interim applications filed in Writ Petition No. 7335 of 2011. It held that effective service of notice was made on respondents No. 4 and 7 under Order V Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, obviating the need for substituted service. The Court also found valid service …

SHABBIR TAJUDDIN MULANIversusHANUMANT SAHEBRAO MAGAR

Dismissed

The petitioner, accused of a cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sought to recall the complainant as a witness under Section 311 of the CrPC, alleging that his counsel failed to ask about a part payment made by a friend. The trial court rejected the application, …

UMESH SHIVAJI MALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners Umesh Shivaji Mali and Shivaji Ganpati Mali filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 27‑10‑2025 issued by the State under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act. They contended that the order was unlawful and sought to have the interim protection granted on 23‑12‑2025 …

LALITA PRABHASHANKAR THOBDEversusSUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SOLAPUR-1

Allowed

Lalita Prabhashankar Thobde filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 5121 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against the Sub Divisional Officer, Solapur-1. The court examined the prayer clause (b) of the application. It allowed the application in accordance with that …

OMKAR VIJAY KSHIRSAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Omkar Vijay Kshirsagar applied for anticipatory bail in Crime No. 723 of 2025 registered at Faujdar Chawadi Police Station, Solapur City. The applicant deposited Rs. 14,58,500 and complied with the trial court’s direction to report to the police and cooperate with the investigation. The High Court, …

RAGHUNATH RAJARAM DESAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Raghunath Rajaram Desai, filed a criminal application (No. 973 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel or the applicant appeared when the matter was called. During the pendency of this application, …

NITIN BABURAO DHONEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Pankaj Bhaskar Pawar and Nitin Baburao Dhone, were arrested for allegedly facilitating prostitution under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 after a police raid on Aryan Lodge uncovered prostitution activities. The prosecution alleged …

MOHD ISMAIL MOHD SALIM KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mohd Ismail Mohd Salim Khan, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel indicated that the antecedents of the case had not been disclosed, and therefore sought to withdraw the bail application. The court …

SANGRAM SANTARAM SAVANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Court considered Interim Application No. 3806 of 2023 filed by Sangram Santaram Savant seeking to intervene in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2737 of 2023. Neither the applicant nor his counsel were present when the matter was called, but the court examined the records. The applicant’s …

DIGVIJAY DINKAR PATILversusDIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PUNE

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Divisional Commissioner of Pune to decide a complaint filed under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. A Division Bench ordered the Commissioner to decide the complaint, but the petitioners alleged …

SUNIL CHANDRAKANT KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants, Sunil Chandrakant Kamble and Ratan Bhosale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, under IPC s.307 r/w s.34 for an incident where compressed air was forced into a victim's rectum, causing serious injury. They filed an interim application seeking a stay of the …

Mitali mayekarversusKishore Vichare

Disposed Off

The applicant filed a criminal revision challenging the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratnagiri, affirmed by the Sessions Court, which ordered the accused to pay Rs.2,00,000 compensation and undergo one year of simple imprisonment. The accused has fully complied by depositing the …

ABHIJIT JANARDAN KHARAT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicants sought a transfer of criminal proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Devgad, to the Court of the JMFC/Civil Judge Senior Division, Oros, both talukas within Sindhudurg District. The High Court noted that the applicants had repeatedly failed to appear, had not …

BHIMA RAMA KORAVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Bhima Rama Koravi, filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of a notice of hearing dated 4 April 2025 issued by the Residential Deputy Collector, Kolhapur, requiring his appearance on 15 April 2025. The petitioner could not explain what transpired after the hearing …

ROHIT ALIAS GOTYA ANIL CHOUGULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicant, Rohit Anil Chougule, was charged under Section 79 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly making obscene remarks towards a pregnant woman and her minor niece. The complainant alleged mental distress …

ANKUR SAMBHAJI SALUNKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicant, Ankur Sambhaji Salunkhe, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 370 of 2025, which involves offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (sections 69, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3)) and the Indian Penal Code (sections 376, 504, 506). The High Court initially …

PRASHANT SHASHIKANT KUCHEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioner, Prashant Shashikant Kuchekar, filed an interim application seeking an early hearing of Writ Petition No. 1273 of 2024 against the State of Maharashtra. The respondent did not object to the request. The Court, after noting the lack of objection and the reasons stated in the …

GOPINATH BHANUDAS SURYAWANSHIversusThe collector of sangli

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Gopinath Bhanudas Suryawanshi, filed a contempt petition (No. 623 of 2025) arising out of Writ Petition No. 10915 of 2025 against the Collector of Sangli and others. The petition alleged that the respondents had failed to comply with a prior order, thereby committing contempt of …

YOGESH MADHUKAR NIKAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Yogesh Madhukar Nikam applied for bail in a criminal case where the trial had already progressed with 19 prosecution witnesses examined. The State opposed bail, citing that the trial was substantially underway. The Court referred to the Apex Court decision in X v. State of Rajasthan (2024 INSC 909), …

AMAR DADASAHEB PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellants, eleven individuals, filed a criminal appeal seeking bail in connection with Crime No. 622 of 2025, alleged offences under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Appellant No. 1, Amar Dadasaheb Patil, …

TEJAS RAHUL BHALERAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Tejas Rahul Bhalerao, sought regular bail for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000 relating to a large-scale digital arrest scam. The prosecution alleged that the applicant was complicit in defrauding a retired professor of Rs.3.57 …

EKTA VIVEK ALIAS VIBHAS KOKATEversusVIVEK ALIAS VIBHAS ASHOK KOKATE

Allowed

The applicant, a homemaker with a three‑year‑old daughter, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 27 of 2025 from the Civil Judge Senior Division at Vaduj (Satara) to the Civil Judge Senior Division at …

PRADEEP ASHOK PATIL (BHOJE)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposed Off

Petitioner Pradeep Ashok Patil filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor informed the Court that the petitioner had already been acquitted by the trial court. The Court held that, in view …

ROHIT VIJAY WADARversusMOHINI ROHIT WADAR THR DATTRAY BALU SANGAONKAR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Rohit Vijay Wadar filed a writ petition against Mohini Rohit Wadar and others in the Bombay High Court. Both parties appeared before a mediator and reached a settlement, submitting a consent decree to the court. The petitioner then moved to withdraw the petition on the basis of the settlement. The …

SHAMA SALIM SHAIKHversusSAYARA HASHAM KACHHI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Shama Salim Shaikh, was absent along with counsel when the appeal was called. The State's counsel, Dr. A. A. Takalkar, relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to argue that the matter should be before a Sessions …

ATUL BHAIRVNATH KHUPSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellant, Atul Bhairvnath Khupse, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (CR No.711 of 2025) alleged that he assaulted a labourer on his farm, abused him with caste slurs, forced him to consume poison and committed other offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …

RAMESHWAR KISAN GIRIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Rameshwar Kisan Giri, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for assaulting an informant with a wooden stick (sattur). The FIR alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, …

SAMADHAN JAYSINGH PAWARversusAXIS BANK AND ANR

Disposed Off

Samadhan Jaysing Pawar filed a writ petition challenging a possession notice issued by Axis Bank under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Court examined the validity of the notice and whether the petitioner had any other remedy under the Act. It observed that the notice had been taken to its logical end …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD,versusMINAKSHEE PRAMOD SHELAKE AND ORS.,

Disposed Off

The applicant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd, filed an interim application seeking restoration of its first appeal (No. 1932 of 2010) which had been dismissed for default on 15-12-2025. The application was filed immediately thereafter, within the prescribed time. The court examined the averments …

AKSHAY RAMESH KAMATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Akshay Ramesh Kamate, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. He later sought leave to withdraw the bail application, requesting that he be allowed to approach the Court again if the trial does not progress within one year. The Court, after hearing counsel, …

ABDUL AABU KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Abdul Aabu Khan, filed a bail application before the charge sheet was filed in the trial court. Subsequently, the charge sheet was filed, prompting the applicant to move a praecipe seeking permission to withdraw the bail application. The applicant's counsel, Advait P. Vajaratkar, …

NIVRUTTI RAJARAM PATIL AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, two brothers, were granted bail on 16 October 2024 with a condition that they not enter the territorial jurisdiction of Chandgad Police Station during the trial. They sought relaxation of this restriction, citing the ill health of their mother and wife and the need to tend to their …

ABHIJIT BABASO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, considered two anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 2526 and 2527 of 2025) filed by Ranjit Madan Nikam and Abhijit Babaso Patil in connection with Crime No. 286 of 2025, alleged to involve assault causing grievous hurt under several sections of the Bharatiya …

SOHAM SHAHAJI PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Soham Shahaji Patil, filed a criminal bail application which the Court was not inclined to consider. On the applicant's instructions, counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as …

Amit Arun PalavversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Amit Arun Palav filed Contempt Petition No. 21 of 2026 arising out of Writ Petition No. 6527 of 2025 against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought relief alleging contempt of the court. During hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the bench that the underlying proposal had been …

ARUN SHANKAR PATILversusJAYSINGH VASANT GAIKWAD THR LEGAL HEIRS

Disposed Off

Arun Shankar Patil filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging certain actions of the legal heirs of the deceased Jaysingh Vasant Gaikwak. While the petition was pending, the petitioner, through his counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The …

MAYUR DILIP KULKARNIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Allowed

The petitioner, Mayur Dilip Kulkarni, challenged the order dated 17 September 2025 which rejected his proposal for approval of non‑teaching staff, relying on a communication dated 28 May 2025 that barred such approvals until surplus teachers were absorbed. The petitioner argued that this …

GAJANAN GOPAL SHINDE AND ORS.versusSUHAS MAHADEO SHITUT AND ORS

Allowed

The applicants, Gajanan Gopal Shinde and others, filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay and restoration of their writ petition, which had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The court examined whether the delay in filing the application could be excused. It …

SHRI. SANTOSH SHRIRAM SHIRGAONKAR AND ORS.versusDR. SHRI. SONAL DILIP KADAM

Allowed

The appellant, Santosh Shirgaonkar & Ors., deposited Rs.7,50,657 but failed to meet the full statutory deposit required under the proviso to Section 30(1) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, and sought time to comply. The court stood over the matter to 22‑Oct‑2026, warning that the appeal would …

SHRI. SUNIL AMRUTA BOBADE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioners Shri Sunil Gokul Rane and Shri Sunil Amruta Bobade filed writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra seeking relief. Their counsel, Mr. Laxman Deshmukh, filed vakalatnamas and indicated no objection to the petition. The petitions were listed for dismissal, and the court noted that …

ARIF AMAJADKHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Arif Amajadkhan Pathan, challenged a notice terminating his weighman licence upon reaching the age of 58 under the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) bye‑laws. He argued that the age restriction is inapplicable to him because he is covered by the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal …

APPA RATNAPPA HASURKAR DECS THR LRSversusMARUTI RATNAPPA HASURKAR

Allowed

The applicant filed an interim application seeking to record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent. The court noted that the application was filed after a delay. The respondent's counsel raised no substantive objection but requested that costs be imposed on the applicant for the delay. The …

JAGANNATH RAMA VADAR (CHIPARIKAR)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

Jagannath Rama Vadar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Collector to decide a representation dated 8 September 2025, wherein he claimed that a consent decree in a second‑appeal proceeding had settled the partition of a piece of land and that the partition should be effected according …

MADANMOHAN HARIPAD HAJRAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Madanmohan Haripad Hajra, was charged with sexual assault of a minor girl under Sections 75 and 64(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The prosecution alleged the offence occurred on 10 August …

ROSHAN BHIMRAO RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, one of four accused convicted under IPC sections 302, 307, 397 and 34 for the murder of Sunanda and assault on Reshma, sought suspension of his life sentence. The trial court had relied mainly on the testimony of Reshma, an injured eye‑witness, and a test identification parade …

PUSHPA ASHOK KAMBLE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants, Pushpa Ashok Kamble and others, filed a criminal application seeking leave to withdraw the pending application after the charge-sheet had been filed. They requested liberty to file a fresh application if advised. The learned counsel for the respondents opposed the withdrawal. The …

DIGVIJAY SUBHASH MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Digvijay Subhash More, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 37 of 2025) involving alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust over a banana supply transaction. The court observed that the FIR …

NANDKUMAR BABAJI TANDELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Nandkumar Babaji Tandel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chiplun, for murder (IPC s.302), attempt to murder (IPC s.307) and dacoity (IPC s.452), receiving a life term and additional imprisonments with fines. He filed an interim application under Section 235(2) of the …

NAGRAJ R.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Nagraj R., sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging sexual assault of a seven‑year‑old girl, invoking sections 354A(1)(1), 363 read with 34 of the IPC and section 8 of the POCSO Act. The trial court on 30‑Oct‑2023 granted bail subject to a personal bond and …

RIZWAN JAWEED HUSAIN BELIFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, an RTO agent, was implicated in alleged forgery of signatures on Form 26 for vehicle lien removal and issuance of duplicate registration certificates, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471. He sought anticipatory bail, which the trial court granted on 30 …

MAHAVIR BABASO PATILversusSHANKAR SHAHURAO RATHOD AND ANR

Disposed Off

Mahavir Babaso Patil appealed against a summary judgment convicting Shankar Shahurao Rathod under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, seeking to have the judgment quashed and the conviction affirmed. The respondent submitted a death certificate showing that Rathod had died on 13 …

DILIP @ DAGDU SAYAPPA GAIKWAD AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Gaikwad family filed a criminal revision challenging the Special Court’s order that rejected their discharge application in a case alleging disproportionate assets under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Earlier discrete and open inquiries (2005‑2008) by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau found no …

PRATAPSINGH VASANTSING CHAVANversusSUNIL WAMANRAO NANNAJKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant Pratapsingh Vasantsing Chavan filed a criminal appeal against Sunil Wamanrao Nannajkar and another. The appellant, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), argued that the matter should be before a Sessions Court having …

RAVINDRA DATTATRAY TULPULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Ravindra Dattatray Tulpule, did not appear before the Bombay High Court, either in person or via video conference. The State of Maharashtra, through counsel C. D. Mali, relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to argue …

JANARDHAN SHANKAR DHONE AND ORS.versusSADASHIV SHANKAR DHONE AND ORS.

Allowed

The appellant filed Civil Application No. 14 of 2018 to record the legal heirs of a deceased appellant, and the court found the application to be within the prescribed time and allowed it. Similarly, Civil Application No. 13 of 2017 was filed to record the legal heirs of a deceased respondent, and …

VITTHAL MAHADEO JAGDALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Vitthal Mahadeo Jagdale, sought anticipatory bail in connection with CR No. 166 of 2020, which alleged his participation in an unlawful assembly and assaulting persons with an axe, invoking multiple IPC offences, the Disaster Management Act and the Maharashtra COVID‑19 Act. The …

DEEPAK ASHOK DHALEversusASHUTOSH JOHN BEDEKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Deepak Ashok Dhale, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court. The appellant and Respondent No.1 relied on the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) to argue that the matter should be heard by …

PARTH SHRIKRISHNA GOREversusPRASHANT PRAKASHRAO MANE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Parth Shrikrishna Gore, was absent when the matter was called. The State's counsel, Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to argue that the case should be heard by the Sessions Court having …

SAI GANESH CO OP CREDIT SOCEITY LTDversusJITENDRA SHANKAR KURNE AND ANR

Disposed Off

Sai Ganesh Co‑Op Credit Society Ltd appealed against Jitendra Shankar Kurne and others before the Bombay High Court. The appellant and the State counsel argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025), that the criminal proceedings should be heard by …

SHIVAJI SHANKAR PAWAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants, Shivaji Shankar Pawar and others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre‑arrest bail in Crime No. 435 of 2023. The State of Maharashtra produced a copy of the judgment dated 20 May 2026 in Sessions Case No. 29 of …

ALLBAKSHI FARAUKHSAB CHAPATIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Allbakshi Farukshab Chapat, proprietor of Green Fuel Services, was implicated in a fraud case where a sum of Rs 17.64 lakh was allegedly transferred to his account and then to a trading company that failed to deliver oil. The applicant contended he had no direct transaction with the complainant and …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co Operative Society Ltd, filed Criminal Appeal No. 1650 of 2011 against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and the appellant wished to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's counsel confirmed this …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co‑Operative Society Ltd, filed several criminal appeals (Nos. 1648‑1655 of 2011) against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant’s counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and sought to withdraw the appeals. The respondent’s counsel concurred with …

VILAS MARUTI SHENDAGEversusDIGVIJAYSINGH ROHIDAS BHATI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Vilas Maruti Shendage, filed a criminal appeal seeking that the proceedings be transferred to a Sessions Court having jurisdiction, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision. The respondent State opposed the transfer. The High Court, after hearing counsel, noted that the Supreme …

APARNA ADHIK BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Aparna Adhik Bhosale (applicant) had deposited Rs.50,000 and Rs.2,50,000 in the District Court, Sangli, in a criminal proceeding, which were not placed in fixed deposits because the amounts were part of a criminal case. The applicant's advocate could not locate her client, making it impossible to …

NEHA OM NERIKAR MAIDEN NAME NEHA SUNIL BADAVEversusOM CHANDRASHEKHAR MERIKAR

Disposed Off

Neha Om Nerikar filed Misc. Civil Application No. 105 of 2025 seeking relief against Om Chandrashekhar Nerikar. The Court issued notices and set dates for filing an affidavit of service, but the applicant and her advocate, Mr. Bagwe Anil Pandurang, failed to appear on multiple occasions, including …

SHAMRAO GANPATI KOLI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRSversusADINATH GANPATI KOLI

Allowed

The applicant filed an interim application in a second appeal seeking to have the legal heirs of appellant No.1(b) placed on record. The respondents opposed the application. After hearing both sides, the court found merit in the applicant's request and allowed the interim application in accordance …

SNEHAL AMBADAS MERGUversusANAND BAJIRAO UBALE AND ANR

Disposed Off

Snehal Ambadas Mergu filed a criminal writ petition seeking the High Court to call for the records of a Session Court judgment and a Special Trial Court order, and to quash those orders. The petitioner argued that she had already been acquitted in the Special Trial Court case, rendering the petition …

SANDEEP SHAKAR JAKNAIKversusANNARAO RAMCHANDRA AALURE AND ANR

Disposed Off

In Criminal Appeal No. 1058 of 2014, the appellant Sandeep Shakar Jaknaik sought relief against the respondents Annarao Ramchandra Aalure and others. The learned counsel for both sides relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to …

DEEPAK RAMCHANDRA MANEversusMARUTI DATTATRAYA VATKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant Deepak Ramchandra Mane filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against respondents Maruti Dattatraya Vatkar and others. Both parties, citing the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), argued that the matter should be …

SIDDHESH SURESH KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Siddhesh Suresh Kadam, filed two criminal applications (Nos. 1570 and 1558 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. After hearing, the court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the impugned order. On that indication, the applicant’s counsel, on instructions, …

SIDDHESH SURESH KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Siddhesh Suresh Kadam, filed two criminal applications before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. After hearing, the applicant sought leave to withdraw both applications. The court accepted the applicant's statement to withdraw. Consequently, the applications were dismissed as …

SUNITI CHETAN PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Suniti Chetan Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The respondent State, through its learned Additional Public Prosecutor, informed the Court that the petitioner had already been released on bail. On the basis of this information, the Court held that …

TANUJA TUKARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Tanuja Tukaram Patil, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to comply with a High Court order dated 2 January 2024, which directed the Commissioner of Social Justice and Special Assistance to issue directions for payment of her father's family …

VIKAS S. KULKARNIversusTHE COMPETENT AUTHORITY /DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Vikas S. Kulkarni filed a writ petition (No. 1874 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the Deputy Collector, Sangli and others. The petition was accompanied by an interim application. The bailiff’s report later revealed that the sole petitioner was …

SANDEEP SHANKAR JAGTAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19 July 2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 14(1) of the SARFAESI Act. The High Court held that challenges to actions taken under Section 14 must be made under the SARFAESI Act itself and that the court's writ …

VINAYAK JAGANNATH DHOPESHWARKARversusMAHESH RAMCHANDRA GHONE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Vinayak Jagannath Dhopeshwarkar, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The appellant and the State counsel relied on the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) to argue that the matter should be heard by the Sessions …

GOPIKA NILKANTH AAEERversusLADU PARSHURAM GAONKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Gopika Nilkanth Aaeer, filed a criminal appeal (No. 1658 of 2019) against respondents Ladu Parshuram Gaonkar and others. An interim application (No. 3875 of 2024) was filed seeking transfer of the proceedings to a Sessions Court having jurisdiction, relying on the Supreme Court’s …

MALLINATH S/O. TAMANAPPA CHAMARGOALversusNIRMALA W/O. HARIDAS MANE AND ANR

Abated

Mallinath filed an application for leave to appeal and a criminal appeal challenging a Sessions Judge's judgment. During the pendency of these proceedings, the sole applicant died. The applicant's counsel submitted that the death rendered the applications infructuous and sought their disposal. The …

RAJESH MOTORS PVT. LTD., SATARAversusAPPASO HARI GAWADE AND ANR

Disposed Off

Rajesh Motors Pvt. Ltd appealed against Appaso Hari Gawade & Anr. before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench, Kolhapur. The appellant argued, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), that the matter should be heard by a Sessions …

SUJIT SHRIPAD CHIKANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sujit Shripad Chikane, a salesman for Better Choice, was alleged to have misappropriated Rs.1,75,894 while handling payments from retailers, leading to charges under IPC sections 406 and 420. He filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 3182 of 2023) seeking pre‑arrest bail. The trial court, after …

NIKHIL RAVINDRA SHINDE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Petitioners Nikhil Ravindra Shinde and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through counsel, informed the court that the dispute had been amicably settled and they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The learned advocate …

VASANT MARUTI MORE (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL LRS )versusISHWARA JOTI MORE

Disposed Off

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Vasant More, sought restoration of possession of a suit property after a decree of possession in favour of the respondent Ishwara More was being executed. They filed an application (Exhibit 99) alleging improper measurement and execution, invoking Section 47 of …

SUBHASH MAHADEV NAIKversusSINDHUDURG ZILLA PARISHAD AND ANR.

Disposed Off

Subhash Mahadev Naik filed a writ petition seeking the release of his gratuity and pension from Sindhudurg Zilla Parishad, challenging an order dated 30‑06‑1999 that had quashed his retirement benefits. The Court examined the legality of that impugned order and the petitioner’s entitlement under …

ANAND GANGARAM SAWANT AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings (R.C.C. No.74 of 2023) pending before a Judicial Magistrate for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 472 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that the matter was …

SACHIN TUKARAM SHEDAGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Sachin Tukaram Shedage, was incarcerated while a Special POCSO case was pending and had been sentenced to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2025, which was admitted on 17 February 2025, and subsequently filed Interim Application No. 4425 of 2024 …

SUBHASH MAHANTAPPA MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition on 22 December 2015 seeking the quashing of FIR No. 395 of 2015. The petition remained uncirculated since its filing in 2015. The respondent State filed that charges had already been framed against the petitioner. No counsel appeared on behalf of the …

MADHUKAR PARBATI JADHAV AND ANRversusMARUTI PARBHATI JADHAV AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, seeking relief against the respondents. The proceedings were transferred from the Principal Seat in Mumbai to the Kolhapur bench. On the scheduled hearing dates, neither the petitioners nor the respondents …

TUSHAR SATISH PATIL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the reservation of a parcel of land for the construction of a high school and its playground. The petition sought relief against the reservation order. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called on 22 September 2026 …