Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 13401–13600

SHIVAJI BAPU SHENDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Shivaji Bapu Shende applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under sections 420, 406, 409, 467 and 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that co‑accused had been granted interim bail in similar applications (ABA Nos. 1967 and 2197 of 2023). The court noted …

AMOL GOPINATH CHORAGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …

SANDIP RAVASAHEB BEDKYALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sandip Ravasaheb Bedkyale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented by advocates Mr. Bhushan Jadhav and Mr. Chetan Gajanan Patil. During the hearing, the …

PANDURANG NARAYAN SANKPALversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Pandurang Nayaran Sankpal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the District Collector, Sangli and other respondents. The petition was presented in person, and counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pankajsinh A. Deshmukh and Mr. …

MAHAMADALI A. VAHAB SHAIKHversusMARIUAM MAHAMADALI SHAIKH

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mahamadali A. Vahab Shaikh, filed a Family Court Appeal but subsequently lost contact with his counsel, resulting in no instructions being available. The applicant's counsel sought condonation of delay, while the respondent's counsel highlighted two illegitimate children and a …

VIJAY @ DHANANJAY SRIKANT SHINDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Vijay Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for murder (IPC s.302) and criminal intimidation (IPC s.506) based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's wife, who claimed to have seen Shinde assaulting her husband with a stone. The High Court re‑examined the …

BALASAHEB KRISHNA MALIversusASST. REGISTRAR CO-OP. SOC. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Balasaheb Krishna Mali, filed a writ petition but repeatedly failed to supply required copies of documents and did not appear for hearings despite multiple extensions. Notices to the respondents could not be issued, and the petition was already dismissed against two respondents. On …

MASOOD AZIZ MUNNAWAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed To be withdrawn

Petitioners Masood s/o Aziz Munnawar and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. While the petition was pending, evidence commenced in the underlying criminal proceedings. The petitioners, through their counsel, applied to the Court for …

JOTIBA PANDURANG GAVADEversusGRAMSEVAK GRAMPANCHAYAT

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jotiba Pandurang Gavade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled date of 6th November 2025, leading to an adjournment. The petition was again unattended on the subsequent date, 27th November 2025. …

GANESH VISHNUPANT SONAWANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

TRANSFER TO OTHER COURT AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petition filed by Ganesh Vishnupant Sonawane sought to remain before the Principal Seat of the High Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition should be transferred to the Principal Seat. The Court, after hearing counsel, directed the Registry to transmit the papers …

VAIJAYANTI DIPAK KOHLIversusTHE COLLECTOR AND ANR.

Disposed Off

Petitioner Vaijayanti Dipak Kohli filed a writ petition seeking payment of pension and post‑retirement benefits that had been withheld by the Collector. While the petition was pending, she filed an Original Application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) seeking the same relief and …

DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKHversusPUNIT AVINASH SONAWANE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, sought to be impleaded in an injunction suit (RCS No.798 of 2016) filed by respondent No.1 concerning land that had been acquired by the government and later sold to the plaintiff. He alleged that respondents 5 and 6 had fraudulently obtained the land despite …

DHANASHRI SANTOSH RUPNARversusANNASAHEB KALLAPPA UPADHYE

Disposed Off

The applicants, Dhanashri Santosh Rupnar and others, filed a Civil Revision Application No. 345 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging a lower court order. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the Court that they had instructions to withdraw the …

MAHAVIR BHUJGONDA PATILversusTATYASO SHANTGONDA PATIL AND ORS

Allowed

Mahavir Bhujgonda Patil filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 15‑day delay in filing Second Appeal (ST) No. 32792 of 2022 against a judgment dated 11 August 2022 passed by the District Judge‑1, Sangli. The applicant alleged financial hardship and that he could obtain legal assistance …

NARAYAN MARUTI PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Narayan Maruti Patil, had earlier filed Criminal Appeal No.1375/2023 under legal aid, for which counsel was appointed by the court. He subsequently filed a second appeal, Criminal Appeal No.191/2026, through a counsel of his own choice. The appellant’s counsel requested that the …

SHRI. MANOHAR RAJAMRA SHINDE and ANR.versusRAJARAM MALHARI SHINDE and ORS

Rejected

The respondents in a second appeal filed Interim Application No. 3467 of 2019 seeking to vacate an interim order dated 20 December 2018, which had been passed by a single judge of the Bombay High Court by consent of the parties. The earlier order allowed execution proceedings to continue but barred …

ARUN RANGRAO ROKADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Arun Rangrao Rokade applied for anticipatory bail in a case (C.R. No.1149 of 2023) alleging cheating under IPC sections 406, 409 and 420 read with section 34. The allegations stem from a commercial arrangement where Rokade and his wife leased four shops, started a grocery store and induced an …

RADHA SUNIL CHANDOLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Radha Sunil Chandole, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, seeking relief in a case where the investigating officer had submitted a “C” Summary Report on 11 January 2025 indicating that no evidence was found against her. The applicant's counsel, …

NAFISA HASHMAT PARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Nafisa Hashmat Parkar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a fraud case (CR No.339/2023) involving alleged illegal transfer of property and multiple IPC offences (403, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 read with 34). The trial court initially granted her interim bail on 11 December 2023 with …

NITIN RANGRAO MANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nitin Rangrao Mane in connection with Crime No. 556 of 2023, alleged to involve cheating under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was not the purchaser of grapes and offered to …

GOVIND SHANKAR PEDNEKARversusSATYAVAN RAMCHANDRA PEDNEKAR AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, original plaintiff in a partition suit (R.C.S. No. 60 of 2001), sought to have additional issues framed in the final decree proceedings to account for supervening events affecting the dwelling house in Schedule‑B, arguing that such issues were necessary for execution of the decree. …

AMOL SAHEBRAO RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellant, Amol Sahebrao Raut, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated as a witness to a fraudulent sale deed executed in 2010, alleged to violate several IPC offences and provisions of the SCST Act. The complainant, Laxmi Bajarang Katakdaunde, claimed the deed was forged using an …

JAYDEEP MAHADEV DEVKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jaydeep Mahadev Devkar, filed a writ petition seeking direction for his appointment as Police‑Patil under the State of Maharashtra. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, expressed displeasure at granting relief given the peculiar facts of the case. The petitioner was …

NISHANT MAHADEO MISALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Nishant Mahadeo Misal filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking release in connection with a case registered for offences under IPC sections 188, 272, 273, 328 and several provisions of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006. The applicant's …

RUTUJA RAJESH RATHYEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Rutuja Rajesh Rathye, filed a writ petition seeking relief. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner obtained individual approval for the relief sought, rendering the petition infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner moved that the petition be withdrawn on this …

TAUFEEK JAHANGIR JAMADAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 0350 of 2024 and related criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 352 and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between the husband (Petitioner No.1) and his wife (Respondent No.2) had …

KUSUM SATISH KHOTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR AGP AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kusum Satish Khot, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to quash an order dated 15 September 2022 passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court noted that the SARFAESI Act provides a specific remedial forum – the Debt Recovery Tribunal – for challenges to such orders. …

SAMARTH COLLECTIONversusSUSHIL CREATIONS SHRI. SUSHIL PREMCHAND VANJANI

Disposed Off

Samarth Collection filed a criminal revision application against Sushil Creations and Shri Sushil Premchand Vanjani. Both parties, through their counsel, presented consent terms dated 1 October 2026, which were read, identified, and marked in the court record. The consent terms were accepted as an …

ASHOK KASHINATH KARPE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. They later withdrew their papers and gave a No Objection Certificate to appoint a new advocate, but failed to appear before the court. No counsel appeared on their behalf on the hearing date. The court observed that the …

SWAPNIL SUNIL POTDAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Swapnil Sunil Potdar and Rohit Motilal Narote applied for anticipatory bail in connection with CR No.1602 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 326, 354, 452, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The trial court, on 21 December 2023, granted conditional anticipatory bail, …

AJAY RAMCHANDRA SAPTALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Ajay Ramchandra Saptale, was named as Accused No.3 in Crime No.849 of 2023 for alleged offences of sexual exploitation and criminal intimidation under Sections 354, 354(A), 354(D), 506 read with 34 of the IPC and Sections 8, 9 and 12 of the POCSO Act. An anticipatory bail application …

ARUN VITTHAL PAUDMALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

The petitioner, Arun Vitthal Paudmal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the request, ordered that the petition be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive issues …

SHANTILAL BHOLENATH SABLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Shantilal Bholenath Sable filed a second anticipatory bail application (pre‑arrest bail) in Crime No. 467 of 2023 after his earlier anticipatory bail application was rejected and he was subsequently arrested. The State’s counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, …

LALIT BABULAL SANGHAVIversusPRITHVIRAJ JAYCHAND OSWAL AND ORS

Allowed

The applicant, Lalit Babulal Sanghavi, filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased respondent, Prithviraj Jaychand Oswal, on record. The court noted that the heirs had been served but had not appeared, …

GOKULABAI BHIMRAO SALUNKHEversusSHRI. ANILKUMAR LAXMAN BHOSALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Gokulabai Bhimrao Salunkhe, filed an appeal against an order dated 2019 along with two interim applications. During the pendency of the appeal, the sole appellant passed away. The learned counsel for the appellant informed the court of the appellant's death. The court held that the …

SUMIT PRAKASH JAINversusBARSHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sumit Prakash Jain, filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning a notice issued under Section 53(1) of the MRTP Act. He indicated that he had already applied to the Barshi Municipal Council for regularisation of the structure under Sections 53(3) and 44(4) of the MRTP Act and …

MR. VIRSEN DHOTREversusSHIVTEJ AAROGHYA SEVA SANTHA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

Virsen Dhotre filed a public interest litigation challenging a Government Resolution dated 7 June 2006 that leased government lands to Shivaji Aaroghya Seva Santha. The petitioner alleged grievance over the lease but failed to appear before the court at any stage. The court noted the passage of time …

JUGGLER SPORTS PVT LTD AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Juggler Sports Pvt Ltd and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a police raid conducted on 31 October 2024, alleging that the raid and subsequent seizure of vehicles, cash, CCTV equipment and other items were illegal and arbitrary. They sought a declaration of …

SANJAY RANGRAO GHODAKE AND ORSversusDHANAJI BABURAO PATIL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicants filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of the order dated 12 June 2026. They asserted that the suit had been withdrawn solely by them and that the order should reflect this fact. The court considered the claim, found no impediment to the …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAMESHANNA SIDRAMAPPA PATIL

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of Rameshanna Sidramappa Patil by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur. The State contended that the trial court erred in disregarding the confession of co‑accused Pradeep and that there was sufficient evidence …

MAHAADEV MALLESHAPPA KUDREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, Mahadev Malleshappa Kudre and others, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined …

Archna Mahadev GaikwadversusMahadev Balbhi Gaikwad

Allowed

The applicant, a homemaker caring for a seven‑year‑old son born out of wedlock and an aged mother, filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the CPC seeking transfer of a marriage petition (No. 256 of 2023) from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramati to the Family Court, …

SNEHAL SUNIL SALVIversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE RATNAGIRI ANDORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11 September 2024 that was passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner argued that the order was improper, although the statute also provides an alternate remedy under Section 17. No counsel appeared on behalf of the …

UTTAM DNYANDEO BHOPALEversusSMT. NANDABAI SAKHARAM PATIL AND ORS.

Dismissed

The applicant, Uttam Dnyandeo Bhopale, filed Interim Application No. 747 of 2025 in the first appeal No. 35861 of 2024. The applicant failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled date. The Court noted that the applicant also did not appear on a prior occasion. Consequently, the Court dismissed …

UTTAM DNYANDEO BHOPALEversusSMT. NANDABAI SAKHARAM PATIL AND ORS.

Dismissed

The applicant, Uttam Dnyandeo Bhopale, filed Interim Application No. 747 of 2025 in the first appeal No. 35861 of 2024. The applicant failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled date. The Court noted that the applicant also did not appear on a prior occasion. Consequently, the Court dismissed …

BHAGOJI VITTHAL BAUDANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Bhagoji Vitthal Baudane, filed an interim application seeking suspension of his sentence and enlargement of bail pending the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 127 of 2022. The applicant’s counsel, Ms. Archana Gaikwad, informed the court that the applicant was already in jail for a …

VINAYAK PARSHURAM PARADKAR AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition in 2024 seeking the quashing of FIR No. 1 of 2024 registered at Malvan Police Station for offences under Sections 353, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent State, through APP Mrs. Priyanka Rane, informed the Court that a charge‑sheet …

GAURAV PRAKASH SHINDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed Criminal Writ Petition No.6697 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench, Kolhapur. During the pendency of the petition, the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) in Satara delivered a judgment on 3-12-2015 in RCC No. 541/2025 acquitting the petitioner. The …

Balkrishna Ramchandra ShelarversusAvinash Narayan Parulekar

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Balkrishna Ramchandra Shelar, sought to withdraw his criminal application after citing the Supreme Court's decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran. He also requested liberty to file an appeal in the appropriate forum. The learned counsel for the applicant made this request …

NEELAM MAHENDRA ARYA and ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ANR.

Dismissed

The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3, challenged the appellate order that upheld their conviction for defamation under Section 500 read with Section 34 of the IPC, while setting aside the imprisonment term and increasing the fine. The complainant alleged that the petitioners, together with accused …

NANASAHEB SHANKARRAO GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaikwad, a 75‑year‑old accused, sought regular bail for offences of cheating and forgery under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 of the IPC, the Registration Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The prosecution alleged that he and family members …

QASIM RASHID KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Qasim Rashid Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the application and to file a fresh one after fully disclosing his criminal antecedents, relying on the Supreme Court decision in Zeba Khan v. State of Uttar …

HARAKCHAND JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard a group of five writ petitions seeking to quash a criminal FIR and the magistrate’s order directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. All petitions arose from the same FIR (No.11 of 2022) filed on a complaint by a former KDMC corporator alleging fraud and …

ASHUTOSH SATCHIDANAND PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, former director and CEO of Kailasa Analytics, was charged under IPC Sections 406 and 409 for the company's failure to deposit statutory Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) contributions for October and November 2017. The company later paid the arrears with interest, but the prosecution …

NIRAJ RAJARAM MOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Niraj Rajaram More, was one of seven accused in FIR No.637 of 2023 for assault and related offences arising from a dispute during a Ganesh Visarjan procession. The complainant later filed an affidavit stating he could not identify More and no longer wished to prosecute him, seeking to …

ROHAN PANDIT MHALASKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Rohan Pandit Mhalaskar, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act and Maharashtra Police Act. The primary evidence was CCTV footage showing his presence at the scene but not any …

MUKTAI GANESH GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaikwad, a 75‑year‑old accused, sought regular bail for offences of cheating and forgery under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 of the IPC, the Registration Act and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The prosecution alleged that he and family members …

TIRUMALESH MALLESHAM KATLAversusTHE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he forged the complainant’s signature to surrender two LIC policies without authority, invoking sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant contended that he acted with the …

M/S. SUTTATTI ENTERPRISES LTD.versusMRS. MANDABAI DATTATRAYA GARAD

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a factory employer, challenged a Labour Court award that ordered the reinstatement of the respondent, a former peon, with full back wages from 5 September 2010. The dispute centered on whether the respondent was lawfully terminated or had voluntarily abandoned her job after being …

SOU. GEETANJALI KULKARNIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS.

Disposed Off

Geetanjali Kulkarni, a retired assistant teacher, filed a writ petition seeking her pension to be calculated on the basis of a revised B.A., B.Ed. pay scale, claiming entitlement after ten years of continuous service post‑qualification. She alleged that despite a 2000 court order directing …

SHUSHMA PARMANAND KATLAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with FIR No. 340 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR was based on …

KIRAN SHIVAJI KHANDAGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered the bail application of Kiran Shivaji Khandagale, arrested under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 for the alleged murder of Santosh Dhamale. The applicant pleaded for bail under Section 483 of the …

JAYASHREE DYANESHWAR BARGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Rohan Pandit Mhalaskar, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act and Maharashtra Police Act. The primary evidence was CCTV footage showing his presence at the scene but not any …

SHAHIDA PASCAL POSTELversusPASCAL MICHEL POSTEL AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Sonali Milind Patil, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 22 June 2026 passed by a Judicial Magistrate First Class. The respondents, Pascal Michel Postel and others, contended that the writ petition was not maintainable because an appeal under Section 29 of the …

SUGANDHA SUBHASH JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, a maid of eight years, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for a theft allegation under Section 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR named an unknown person and did not specifically charge the applicant, basing …

PUROSHOTTAM GAJANAN PATANKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay heard a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Puroshottam Gajanan Patankar, who was charged under several IPC sections including 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 472 read with Section 34. The applicant’s relatives …

AJIT PARMARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ajit Parmar, filed an interim application seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate to hear and finally decide a ‘C’ Summary Report submitted by the Economic Offences Wing, along with related proceedings, within a specified time. The Single Judge had …

SHARIFMIYA AMIRMIYA SHAIKHversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed by accused No.4, No.5 and No.6 in a money‑laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, where the prosecution alleged creation of shell companies and fictitious bank accounts. The accused had been in pre‑trial …

IRFAN IBRAHIM SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, Israr Ahmed Ibrahim Shaikh and others, had filed Writ Petition No.3868 of 2024 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on 22 July 2026 on the ground of non-prosecution. The petitioners filed an interim application (No.2967 of 2026) …

NARENDRA RAMNIRANJAN JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Mohan Thomas filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 2140/2026) directly before the Bombay High Court, without first approaching the Sessions Court after the registration of FIR No. 292 of 2026. The respondent's counsel highlighted this procedural lapse and the applicant's counsel sought …

RITESH KUMAR S. SHAHversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three simultaneous bail applications filed by accused No.4, 5 and 6 in a PMLA case (ECIR/MBZO‑II/20/2024) involving alleged creation of shell companies and money‑laundering. The applicants had been in pre‑trial detention for more than 18‑20 months while the …

KHILJI MOHSINAHMED MUSTAKALIversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed by accused No.4, No.5 and No.6 in a money‑laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, where the prosecution alleged creation of shell companies and fictitious bank accounts. The accused had been in pre‑trial …

JEM FISCAL LIMITED THROUGH ZOHRA HAKEEMversusSHARAN KHANNA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Jem Fiscal Limited and Zohra Nazir Hakeem, challenged orders of an Additional Sessions Judge made under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 which directed a deposit of 30% of a cheque amount, alleging that the orders were passed without any reasons. They relied on …

ZOHRA NAZIR HAKEEMversusSHARAN KHANNA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jem Fiscal Limited, filed six writ petitions challenging orders of an Additional Sessions Judge made under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 that directed a 30% deposit of the cheque amount. The petitioner argued that the orders were passed without any reasons, …

ZOHRA NAZIR HAKEEMversusTAPIN KHANNA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Jem Fiscal Limited and Zohra Nazir Hakeem, challenged orders of an Additional Sessions Judge made under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 which directed a deposit of 30% of a cheque amount, alleging that the orders were passed without any reasons. They relied on …

RANJEEV AGGRWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Ranjeev Aggarwal filed an interim application seeking relief against the order dated 11 August 2026 that dismissed his writ petition for non‑prosecution. The applicant was represented by Ms. Vinsha Acharya, Mr. Rajendra Jain and Mr. Pranil Lahigade, while the State of Maharashtra and another …

DEEPAK DIGAMBAR DHUMALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Deepak Digambar Dhumal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Ishan Paradkar (by Rahi Patil). The State of Maharashtra was represented by APP Mr. Amit Munde. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the …

PODAR EDUCATION TRUST THRU TRUSTEES I) PAVANKUMAR PODAR AND II) MANGAL PRASAD VISHWANATH DIXITversusTHEPRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Podar Education Trust filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging actions of the Principal Secretary, School Education & Sports Department. The petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the existing petition and instead file separate petitions for each school it …

PRATIMA AMIT BHATIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Pratima Amit Bhati, filed an anticipatory bail application which the respondent's counsel highlighted omitted certain antecedent facts. The respondent argued that these undisclosed antecedents should be considered. The applicant's counsel then sought to withdraw the existing …

SUHAS UTTAM SHINDEversusVAISHALI NTIN SHIMPI AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Petitioner Sonali Milind Patil filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4536 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court inadvertently. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the appropriate remedy is a revision, which has already been filed in the same court. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ …

IRFAN GHULAM HUSSAIN TINWALAversusISHAQ ABDULLA PARKAR AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Petitioners Sonali Milind Patil and Irfan Ghulam Hussain Tinwala filed two criminal writ petitions challenging proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging that a typographical mistake was being used to delay the case concerning a cheque of Rs.38,70,000,00/-. The …

WAHEEDA MUNIR HODEKARversusTHE AUTHORISED OFFICER BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Waheeda Munir Hodekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an e‑auction notice issued by the Bank of Maharashtra. She had earlier filed a securitisation application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of …

KISSAN ANANDA GAWLI .versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Dismissed

The appellant, Kissan A. Gawli, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 498-A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving rigorous imprisonment of two years and five years respectively. He filed Criminal Appeal No. 397 of 2000 challenging the conviction and …

SHRI MAHENDRA R. SAWANT .versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Dismissed

Mahendra R. Sawant was tried for murder (Section 302 IPC) and grievous hurt (Section 325 IPC). The trial court convicted him under Section 325 and sentenced him to four years' rigorous imprisonment, acquitting him of the murder charge. He appealed the conviction in Criminal Appeal No. 488 of 2000. …

MANOJ RAMESH BHATIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Manoj Ramesh Bhatia, filed a criminal revision in 2018 challenging a Sessions Court order dated 18 November 2017 that enhanced interim maintenance for his second wife under the Domestic Violence Act. The revision sought to overturn the increased maintenance amount. The matter was …

SHAIKH ISMAIL MOHAMMEDversusSHREE THIRTHANKAR COMPANY AND ANR

Dismissed

The petition was filed by the original defendant challenging the orders of the executing court that dismissed his objection to the execution of an eviction decree. The petitioner argued that the conveyance deed in favour of the plaintiff was unregistered at the time the suit was filed, contending …

ARUN LAXMAN YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Arun Laxman Yadav had been granted interim bail on 13 August 2026 in a criminal case. The parties subsequently settled the dispute amicably, with the applicant paying the full agreed amount to Respondent No.2 and expressing intent to seek quash of the FIR. Respondent No.2, through counsel, indicated …

UMESH VILAS RAHANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellant, Umesh Vilas Rahane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, in Sessions Case No.18 of 2016 for offences under Sections 376(2)(i)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. He filed an appeal …

MR.HARISH CHANDRA SINGH GOURversusMRS JULIANA SERPHIS

Disposed Off

The plaintiff, owner of a garage in Pune, allowed his wife to let the defendant occupy the premises temporarily after the defendant was evicted from her prior residence. The defendant claimed she was a tenant, having paid a deposit of Rs.17,500 and a monthly rent of Rs.125, but produced no …

JAYANT MANIKLAL LUNAWAT and ANR.versusPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jayant Maniklal Lunawat, challenged the Pune Municipal Corporation's (PMC) cancellation of eleven Development Rights Certificates (DRCs) that were issued as compensation for surrendering his land for a sewage treatment plant. The petitioner argued that the DRCs were lawfully granted, …

AMIRULLAH HIDAYATULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Amirullah Hidayatullah Khan, filed a criminal bail application claiming an urgent need for heart surgery. He asserted that his medical condition warranted immediate release on bail. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Hamidullah Khan, submitted a praecipe on 19 September 2026 but did not …

RAMDAS JAGGANATH INGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Ramdas Jagganath Ingale, who was charged under Sections 103, 11(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged murder arising from a property dispute. The …

JYOTI NANA GOLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Jyoti Nana Gole, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case (CR No. 139 of 2026) involving alleged cyber‑fraud where a bogus online profile was used to obtain Rs. 6,03,600 from the complainant. The …

NIRANJAN CHUNILAL SHAHversusAMARJIT SINGH BHATIA AND ANR.

Dismissed

The appellant, Shri Niranjan Chunilal Shah, filed a first appeal (No. 855 of 2006) against Amarjit Singh Bhatia and another respondent. The matter was adjourned multiple times due to non‑appearance of parties and the illness of counsel. On 24 August 2026 the appeal was dismissed for default, but was …

RAVISINGH SHAMSINGH KALYANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ravisingh Shamsingh Kalyani, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999. He is accused of house …

MOHD. MUKEEN KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Mohd. Mukeen Khan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly failing to deliver stitched gowns after receiving 3,200 pieces of cloth worth …

BULCHAND GOKULDAS AHUJAversusTAPANKUMAR CHATTERJEE AND ANR

Dismissed

An appeal was filed by Bulchand Gokuldas Ahuja against Tapankumar Chatterjee and another party. On 11 August 2026, no representative appeared for the appellant, and the court warned that the appeal would be dismissed if the appellant remained absent. The appellant again failed to appear on the …

RAM SAHODER RAJWADEversusSHEEL VARDHAN SINGH, DIRECTOR GENERAL (CISF)

Disposed Off

Ram Sahoder Rajwade filed a contempt petition alleging that the Director General of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) had failed to comply with an earlier order. The Respondents submitted that the petitioner had been reinstated with the CISF and that the order was therefore complied with. …

JITENDRA CHHAGANLAL SHAHversusDAKSHA JITENDRA SHAH AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicant filed a criminal revision application challenging a September 2017 order of the Metropolitan Magistrate that allowed the respondent to reside in a MHADA flat. Since filing the revision in 2018, neither the applicant nor his counsel pursued the matter or sought circulation of the …

ABHISHEK SHASHANK MAITYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Abhishek Shashank Maity filed a criminal writ petition (CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1885 OF 2023) before the High Court of Bombay challenging the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled dates. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mr. …

ROSHAN AFZAL SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Roshan Afzal Shaikh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 62 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving an attempt to pledge a chain as gold to obtain a loan. The chain was …

SABRUDDIN HUSSAIN ALI SHAIKH @ SHABBUversusVIJAY VITTHAL SONAWANE AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petition challenges a judgment of the Co‑operative Court that ordered the petitioner and the co‑operative society to hand over peaceful possession of tenement D‑5 to respondent‑1, a member of the society. The petitioner claims ownership of the tenement through a chain of unregistered sales …

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusM/S. SHREE ENTERPRISES AND ORS

Dismissed

The Employees State Insurance Corporation appealed against the acquittal of two respondents in a case under Sections 85(a) and 85(i)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The Metropolitan Magistrate had acquitted the respondents, but the appellant argued that the appeal should be heard on …

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusM/S. SHREE ENTERPRISES AND ORS

Dismissed

The Employees State Insurance Corporation appealed against the acquittal of two respondents by a Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Sections 85(a) and 85(i)(b) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The police report indicated that the first respondent's establishment did not exist at the …

SAGAR LAXMAN VALVIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Sagar Laxman Valvi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 108, 352, 62 and 356(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that he threatened the …

KARTHIKEYAN VISHNUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Karthikeyan Vishnu, filed a criminal revision application seven days after the prescribed period and sought condonation of the delay. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the condonation. The court considered the submissions and reasons presented by the applicant's …

KAUSAR YUNUS SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Applicant, Kausar Yunus Shaikh, was the original complainant in a prosecution filed by Nagpada Police Station, Mumbai, against Respondent No.2 under Sections 376 and 328 of the IPC and Section 66(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The Applicant had applied for further investigation …

RAMSUMER R. PATELversusASBIBI BHIWANDI EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS.

Dismissed

The petitioner, Navnath Waghmare, filed a writ petition and a civil application seeking relief. The court scheduled the matter for dismissal, but the petitioner’s counsel later submitted copies of written communication, postal receipts, and a tracking report showing delivery on 09.09.2026. Despite …

SHALAKA SHIRISH DESAIversusDAKSHA JITENDRA SHAH AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The applicant filed a criminal revision application challenging a September 2017 order of the Metropolitan Magistrate that allowed the respondent to reside in a MHADA flat. Since filing the revision in 2018, neither the applicant nor his counsel pursued the matter or sought circulation of the …

NAMDEO SOPAN NALWADE AND ANR.versusSMT. SHAMSHAD BEGUM MOHMAD SHAIKH AND ORS.

Dismissed

The appellants, an insured and insurer, appealed against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled hearing dates of 24 August 2026 and again on 7 September 2026. The High Court therefore adjourned the matter and ultimately dismissed the appeal for …

HANUMANPRASAD DEVILAL AGRAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicant, Hanumanprasad Devilal Agrawal, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a cheating and breach of trust case (Section 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) where he is not named in the FIR. The FIR alleges that three accused failed to pay …

NURUDDIN BADRUDDIN AJANIversusFAYYAZ AMIRALI SHROFF AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner Arjun Vitthal filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and to challenge an order directing 20% of the cheque amount to be deposited as interim compensation under Section 143-A. The High Court noted that the …

SETHU JAYAKUMARversusARATI UNNI W/O SETHU JAYAKUMAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sethu Jayakumar, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Judicial Magistrate First Class, 5th Court, Pune, to expedite the pending Criminal MA No.1441 of 2022. The respondents (Arati Unni W/O Sethu Jayakumar and others) raised no objection to the request. The learned …

Baburao Dhondiba KhaireversusParshuram Genu Khaire

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay heard an interim application filed by the applicants, Baburao Dhondiba Khaire & Ors., against the respondents, Parshuram Genu Khaire & Ors. The learned advocate Ms. Poonam Pal, appearing through Mr. Sachin Hande, presented the application. After considering the prayer …

KUMAR KALGONDA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Kumar Kalgonda Patil was granted bail on 29‑04‑2026 with a condition requiring immediate furnishing of surety. He could not comply and filed an interim application seeking provisional cash bail of Rs.20,000 and a deferment of the surety requirement. The High Court examined the application and …

PARVEZ HUSAIN PATEL AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, who have been externed from Mumbai city, Mumbai suburban and Thane for one year, filed an appeal against the externment order and within that appeal sought an interim stay of the order on 7 July 2026. Under the Maharashtra Police Act, such interim applications must be decided within …

ANIL BHAGWAN MHASKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The appellant, convicted of murder under IPC Section 302 and assault under Section 504, was sentenced to life imprisonment and a one‑year rigorous term in 2019. He has been in custody for over 13 years and filed an interim application seeking bail and suspension of his sentence pending a criminal …

SUDHIR BHARAT BHORADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Sudhir Bharat Bhorade, accused No.3 in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 420, 406, 409 read with 34. The principal accused (Accused No.1) and co‑accused No.2 had …

NIRANJAN MANGESH WADNERE AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners, a husband, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to set aside a domestic violence order dated 6 July 2024 passed by the Sessions Judge. During the hearing, the petitioners produced a divorce decree dated 13 February 2026, showing that the marriage had been dissolved by a Civil …

RAHUL ASHOK ASWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Rohit Ashok Aswale filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was represented by Ms. Mrunmai K. Rokade, while the State of Maharashtra and a second respondent were represented by Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad and Ms. Keral Mehta respectively. The applicant chose to withdraw the bail …

STEFAN MENDONSAversusALISHA YOGESH THANDANEY

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Stefan Mendonsa, filed an interim application before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The applicant, through counsel Himanshu S. Nagarkar, sought leave to withdraw that interim application and requested liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings thereafter. The respondent, …

MANISH NAGINDAS DOSHIversusKAVYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ORS

Disposed Off

Manish Nagindas Doshi filed a writ petition seeking an order to expedite the hearing of a criminal case (No. CC/2649/2016) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, 43rd Court, Borivali, which had been pending for more than ten years. The petitioner argued that the prolonged delay violated …

MANISH NAGINDAS DOSHIversusKAVYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Disposed Off

Manish Nagindas Doshi filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking an expedited hearing of a criminal case (No. CC/2648/2016) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, 43rd Court, Borivali, which had been pending for over ten years without disposal. The petitioner …

AARIF RAMZAN TAMBOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aarif Ramzan Tamboli under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with alleged illegal dealing in prohibited gutkha, pan masala and flavored tobacco. The prosecution alleged offences under …

RAKESH BRAJENDRA CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Rakesh Brajendra Chaudhari (also identified as Sumit Durgaprasad Gupta) in connection with charges under Sections 123, 223, 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

ASIF SERAJUL SHAIKHversusState Of Maharashtra

Dismissed

Applicant Asif Serajul Shaikh filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Gaurav Bhawnani, appearing on behalf of Khan Abdul Wahab, sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The State, represented by Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, opposed the withdrawal. …

Shantanu Dnyaneshwar NisalversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Shantanu Dnyaneshwar Nisal, filed a criminal revision seeking the release of his Toyota Fortuner seized by police in a case under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The prosecution alleged that the vehicle, without a number plate, was used by a co-accused to flee …

SOHEL FIROZ SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the CrPC for bail of a 20‑year‑old accused (Accused No.3) in a case involving alleged illegal possession and sale of a country‑made pistol under Sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra …

JAVAHAR ARJUNDAS RAMNANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The 68‑year‑old applicant, a retired businessman, was arrested outside Chinchwad Railway Station for allegedly possessing 6.055 kg of marijuana, alleged violations of Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(b) of the NDPS Act. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

RAHUL @BHAVDYA MACHINDRA JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Rahul Jadhav, was accused of striking his elder brother with the butt of an axe, leading to charges under IPC sections 307, 324, 504 and 506. He had been in custody for over three years and seven months without charges being framed. The applicant sought bail under Section 483 of the …

SOHEL HAKIK KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a murder case (Section 103(1) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023). The prosecution’s case was entirely circumstantial, relying mainly on a …

MAYANK PURUSHOTTAM GUPTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mayank Purushottam Gupta, who was charged with cheating, breach of trust, and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest …

SOMNATH @ SANA RAGHUNATH ZANJARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Somnath @ Sana Raghunath Zanjar, was named in a supplementary statement to FIR No.64 of 2023 for offences including attempt to murder and organised crime, but the statement only alleged that he fled the scene. He had been in custody for over three years while other co‑accused had …

SURESH UMAJI MADNEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Suresh Umaji Madne, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Kritika, argued for the grant of bail, while the State's counsel, Mr. Amit A. Palkar, opposed it. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed its disinclination to …

MANGESH @ SAGAR SHARAD RAHATALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mangesh @ Sagar Sharad Rahatal, was charged under multiple IPC sections including murder (302) in a dispute between two families that escalated to the use of weapons. He had been in custody for over two years while all other co‑accused had been released on bail. The applicant …

SUJIT RAJKUMAR KHIVANASARAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sujit Rajkumar Khivanasara under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 123, 223, 274 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and several provisions of the Food Safety and …

SAMEER ABDULKALAM SHEKHDAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a narcotics case (C.R. No. 73 of 2024) where the applicant, Sameer Abdulkalam Shekhdare, was arrested with 1.037 kg of charas and had been in custody for …

UPESH RANJIT PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Upesh Ranjit Patil, founder of Flynaut OPC and Flynaut Saas Pvt. Ltd., was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging that he duped training candidates by failing to place them despite promises, invoking charges under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 112(2) read with Section …

DEVRAJ @ HAPPY TARKESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Mr. Nikitesh Kotangale and co-counsel Nishant Singh, Krishma Joshi, Amit Jaiswar, and Sachet Patil. The State was represented by Mr. S. V. …

M/S BAADER SCHULZE LABORATORIESversusFDC INTERNATIONAL NV/SA

Disposed Off

M/s. Baader Schulze Laboratories filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 26‑02‑2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court in a summary suit. The petition remained pending for about ten years with no effort by the petitioner to have …

RAJESH GAMBHIRDAS SHAH AND ANRversusJAYESH PANNALAL SHAH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to set aside the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar dismissing their revision application concerning a cooperative housing society membership and alleged non‑payment of consideration for a flat. The registrar had condoned an eight‑year delay in filing the revision and …

YOGESH ABHAG SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

Disposed Off

Petitioner Yogesh Abhang Shinde filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing municipal officials to act on a Property Cell report and take possession of nine galas/shops illegally occupied for 22 years, and to hold errant officers liable for losses. The respondents argued that they needed …

FANCY NATVARLAL BORAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged notices issued under Sections 260(1)(2) and 267(1)(2)(3) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, alleging that the second floor of their building was illegal and that they had already filed a detailed objection on 4 May 2026. The Court referred to an earlier …

MOHAMMED AZHARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, objected, pointing out that the applicant had undisclosed criminal antecedents which were not mentioned in the application. The applicant’s counsel then sought …

BANK OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHRI. A. B. SATARDEKAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bank of Maharashtra, a nationalised bank, owned a chawl that it redeveloped into a new building and entered into tenancy agreements with the former tenants, Arjun Satardekar and Janabai Raut. After the tenants' deaths, the bank served notices under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act …