Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 18001–18200
The petitioners filed a writ petition which was initially listed but no counsel appeared. The court ordered a stand‑over to allow the respondents to take instructions, and later noted that the petition was dismissed against one respondent under a prior conditional order. Despite the petitioners' …
M/s. Kundan Collection A and Ors. filed an arbitration appeal before the High Court of Bombay against The Cosmos Co-op. Bank Limited, Pune. The appellants were represented by Mr. Harshad Kapadiya and Mr. Ronak Shah, while no counsel appeared for the respondent. The court noted that the matter had …
A. Doshi and Co. filed an interim application seeking restoration of their writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant's counsel, Minal Chandnani, was absent in the morning session, and later her instructed advocate, Rajesh Ranglani, appeared to inform the Court that Chandnani was …
The Court noted that the Board could not be taken up on the scheduled date due to paucity of time. Consequently, the matter was adjourned to 7 July 2026. Any interim relief previously granted continues to operate until the next date. No substantive arguments or evidence were addressed in this …
The petitioner, Pradyot Govind Nawathe, filed a criminal writ petition and later sought leave to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal, disposing of the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, all other pending applications in the matter were also …
The applicant, Sayeed Amjadkhan Pathan, filed an interim application in a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. The court noted this instruction and considered whether there was any …
The petitioner, Asif Kapadia, filed a writ petition (No. 17207 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Bharat Co-op. Credit Soc. Ltd and others. During the proceedings, a remand order was passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel applied for …
The petitioner, Mahadev Hira Koli, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking relief. The petitioner later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue his grievance in a civil court. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. …
On 15 June 2026 the petitioners, Keshav Malaji Makwana & Anr., failed to appear before the Bombay High Court for their writ petition. The matter was listed for hearing on the same day and again on 22 June 2026, but the petitioners remained absent. No representation was made on either occasion. The …
The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation claiming ownership of a property and alleging that construction by Respondent No.6 was contrary to national interest because it proceeded without defence authority permission. An earlier suit filed in 2022 sought an interim injunction, which the …
The petitioner, Kalyani Pandharinath Lohakare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a condition requiring submission of a bank statement and to compel the Nashik Municipal Corporation to consider cash vouchers as proof of experience. The corporation responded with a communication …
The petitioner, Hari Karamshi Thakkar, filed a review petition (No. 79 of 2026) seeking relief from the earlier order in Writ Petition No. 2478 of 2025. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Krishna Shukla, on instructions, applied to the Court for permission to withdraw the review petition. The Court …
Petitioner Vipul Kanji Rajor filed a criminal writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the quash of FIR No./C.R. No.37/2016, the charge-sheet, and related proceedings against him. The petition alleged that the proceedings were improper and requested a writ of certiorari. The petitioner’s …
Amit Shrikant Nemade filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, his counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted. It found no impediment to the applicant's request. Consequently, the …
The Bombay High Court heard two related writ petitions challenging the termination of Sunita Chandramauli Singh and the appointment of Jaya Rajesh Singh as Head Mistress of a school. Both petitioners and respondents agreed to dispose of the matters as per the minutes of order. The Court did not …
The applicant, Mohammad Ali Abdul Ajij Shaikh, sought bail on medical grounds after being released on interim bail and subsequently surrendering on 18 June 2026. The applicant's counsel argued that the medical condition which justified the earlier interim bail still persisted and that the applicant …
Petitioner Prashant S. Kokane applied for a certificate to appear in person and sought preservation of CCTV footage of an incident dated 17-20 March 2025. The petitioner also filed an interim application (No. 1946 of 2026) requesting the same preservation. The Court noted that the petitioner had …
The appellant, a tenant of a ground‑floor tenement in Abubakar Estate, Dharavi, challenged the trial court’s order rejecting his notice of motion seeking protection against demolition of an alleged unauthorized structure. The Municipal Corporation had issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai …
The appellant, a tenant of a ground‑floor tenement in Abubakar Estate, Dharavi, challenged the trial court's order rejecting his notice of motion seeking protection against demolition of an alleged unauthorized structure. The municipal corporation had issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai …
The writ petition filed in 2019 remained pending for several years without any action to circulate the matter. The petitioner's counsel reported an inability to obtain instructions from the petitioner, who had not communicated since the filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioners sought to amend their writ petition after a land acquisition award was passed on 1 June 2026, adding new grounds of challenge and prayer clauses. They argued that the amendment was necessary to address the potential demolition of a temple on the disputed property, claiming urgency. …
Maya Pandu Shinde applied for bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 80, 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, through counsel, sought to withdraw the present bail application and obtain liberty to file a fresh …
Divyakant Khatau filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 4871 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Accordingly, leave to …
In a writ petition filed by Majeeda Mauzam Kazi, the High Court ordered that the Court Receiver take actual physical possession of the disputed property. The Court Receiver, represented by Mr. Deepak Bhalerao, submitted a site report confirming possession. The petitioner’s counsel agreed to deposit …
The applicant, Ranjith Naramadan, filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. On instructions, his counsel, Ms. Ashwinii Acharii, sought leave to withdraw the application citing a change in circumstances. The respondent State of Maharashtra was represented by Mr. V. A. …
The applicant, Piyush Nitin Donde, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail in a case involving alleged participation in a dacoity and charges under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Indian Arms Act, 1959, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was adjourned earlier as a last chance hearing. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that she had no instructions to proceed further with the petition. …
Mr. Swapnil Sunil Raut filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The Court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant bail. Counsel for the applicant then sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, …
The applicant, Aman Bhola Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging illegal diversion of international telephone calls through a company called M/s Maindoevuvers Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The …
An application was filed seeking restoration of an appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove an objection. The appeal concerned an order passed under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The applicant argued that the delay in filing the restoration application should be condoned. …
The petitioner, a 26‑week pregnant married woman, sought termination of her pregnancy due to severe fetal anomalies, including congenital heart disease and short long bones suggestive of Tetralogy of Fallot. A Medical Board of the District Hospital, comprising specialists, examined the mother and …
The petitioner, Lata Vithal Katkari, claimed a 4,500 sq. m. parcel of land allotted to her under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2008, located in Survey/Gat No.219. The Forest Department proposed to erect a boundary wall around Gat …
The petitioners, a trust, sought relief in a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The State, as respondent No.6, filed a reply affidavit stating that, in light of the Court’s order dated 21‑04‑2017 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal (S.L.P. (C) …
Three anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 1646, 12210, and 12200 of 2026) were filed before the Bombay High Court arising from the same FIR. The applicants, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw these applications and re‑file fresh applications before the Sessions Court. The learned …
Three applicants filed anticipatory bail applications before the Bombay High Court arising from the same FIR. The counsel sought permission to withdraw these applications and re‑file fresh applications before the Sessions Court. The Court, after considering the submissions, allowed the withdrawal, …
The applicants, who were original defendants in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction, filed a Civil Revision under Section 115 CPC challenging the trial court’s order rejecting their application under Order VII Rule 11 seeking dismissal of the plaint. They contended that Section …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 June 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and made no effort to advance the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No …
The petitioner, Sachin Shantaram Sonavane, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. Subsequently, the petitioner applied for leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the cause of action no longer survived. The court considered whether it could grant leave to withdraw a …
The appellant filed Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request to withdraw at a relatively advanced stage of the proceedings. It held that the appellant's request could not be entertained and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 11 July 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and took no steps to circulate the petition. The court noted the petitioner’s apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive arguments …
The appellants filed an appeal against the trial court's order dated 15 June 2019 that dismissed their notice of motion. The trial had already commenced and evidence had been led before the trial court. The High Court, while hearing the appeal, directed the parties to maintain the status quo …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 23 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No steps were taken by the petitioners or their counsel to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing …
The petitioner, Dashrath Kallappa Bhosale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Abhilasha Pawar appearing through Mr. Vivek Arote, requested the court’s permission for the withdrawal. The court considered …
The petitioner, Shabbir @ Vali Dawood Khan, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court's Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 24 January 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the …
Neves Agusta D'souza filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not circulate the petition after 31 July 2019. The record indicated that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition thereafter, suggesting a lack of …
The petition was filed on 16 July 2019 by Vranda Gokuldas Pai and others. No petitioner appeared for hearing and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioner, a liquor retailer, challenged an order directing him to pay full transfer fees for shifting his liquor licence after his shop was demolished for road widening. He argued that the transfer was involuntary and that later notifications exempting such transfers should apply …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 July 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and took no steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Girish Ramdas Nayak, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 17 December 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
Padmini Likhar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 19 November 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the …
The petitioner, Uddhav Mohan Khomne, filed a writ petition and later sought leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to file a fresh petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal as prayed for, expressly keeping all contentions of the parties open for future reference. The …
The petitioner, Ramachandran Vadivel Moopanar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Sathyanarayanan, made the application. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Romaster Mulji Discretionary Trust, filed a writ petition on 2 August 2019 seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No further action was taken by the petitioner or its counsel to advance the petition, including any attempt to circulate it. The court noted the petitioner’s …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 August 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could continue. …
The petitioner, Dr. Arun Natthujee Khodskar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The appellants, Ranjan Mitchell and another, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court against the Deputy Collector, Bombay and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants when the matter was called. Earlier, the court had granted the appellants time to seek instructions and …
The petitioner, Dipti Saroj Kale, filed a writ petition on 19 August 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petition was scheduled for hearing but the petitioner failed to appear when called. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since …
The United India Insurance Company appealed a tribunal order that awarded Rs. 24,32,240 with interest to Ashok Mahadev Patil and others. The insurer argued that the multiplier for compensation should be based on the parents' ages rather than the deceased's age, citing a later decision, but the court …
The petition was filed by Pride Universal Private Limited on 22 August 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioners, a family of six, challenged orders issued by MHADA directing them to obtain amended plans, allocate a 185 sq ft shop area to the Dave family, and surrender surplus built‑up area of 53.36 sq m to the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board. The orders were based on a …
The petitioner, Harshad Dhaneshlal Patel, filed a writ petition on 27 August 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that …
The appellant C.A. Consultants appealed against the acquittal of Thinking Machines Pvt. Ltd. and others by a Judicial Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The magistrate had found the respondents not guilty. The appellant’s counsel failed to appear, and the …
The petitioners, MSEDC Ltd, supplied electricity to the respondent's milk centre on the basis that it would be used for milk processing and thus attracted an industrial tariff. An inspection in 2017 revealed that the premises were only being used as a milk collection, storage and transport centre, …
The State Electricity Distribution Co. issued a provisional assessment bill to M/s Delight Bakery after a Flying Squad inspection found that the bakery, which had obtained an industrial‑category electricity connection, was also selling bakery products on the premises. The petitioner argued that this …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging a January 2020 order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that directed Dr. Ghanshyam to take a suitable policy decision for certain applicants. The State produced a Government Resolution dated 15 March 2024, asserting that the …
The petitioner, IGL Finance Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Directorate of Enforcement and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel requested unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company challenged an order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum directing it to pay Rs.24,000 compensation to one of three complainants whose electricity supply was disrupted due to a transformer failure. The complainants alleged loss of crop …
The petitioner, Purushottam Arjunrao Khairnar, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, Rajeshri Purushotam Khairnar, requested that the Family Court continue with the pending maintenance matter and that the applicant deposit arrears. The Court allowed the …
Meera Ravi Punjabi and Sonia Rajesh Punjabi filed writ petitions challenging the dismissal of their applications under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which sought interim compensation of 20% of the cheque amounts. The Metropolitan Magistrate had dismissed the applications, but the …
The petitioner, Puraram Deeparam Gujar, filed a writ petition (No.1459 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Fauzan Shaikh, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The respondents, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Umashankar Singh Thakur, who was charged with murder, attempted murder, grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and offences under the Arms Act and Bombay Police Act. The prosecution relied on multiple dying declarations of the deceased, who had …
The Bank of India dismissed clerk Sharad Rajaram Khadtare in October 2000 for alleged misappropriation of customers' funds after a domestic enquiry. Thirteen years later, the employee sought reinstatement, leading the Government to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal, which, unable to …
The applicants, two doctors and their sister, were charged with cheating, forgery and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on a complaint alleging fraudulent investment schemes. They sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The Bombay High Court heard two related writ petitions challenging the termination of Sunita Chandramauli Singh and the appointment of Jaya Rajesh Singh as Head Mistress of a school. Both petitioners and respondents agreed to dispose of the matters as per the minutes of order. The Court did not …
The petitioner, Asif Kapadia, filed a writ petition (No. 17207 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Bharat Co-op. Credit Soc. Ltd and others. During the proceedings, a remand order was passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar. On instructions, the petitioner's counsel applied for …
Umesh Kantikumar Gautam applied for bail in a 2020 offence (Crime No. 2666) before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Mr. Prasad Avad, requested permission to withdraw this bail application so that a fresh bail petition could be filed directly in the trial court, relying on a liberty granted in an …
Petitioner Mohammed Salim Shaikh filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order related to FIR No. 0490 of 2023. The petition was listed for hearing on 22 June 2026, but the petitioner did not appear in person or via video conference. The Respondents, represented by APP Mr. Ajay S. Patil and …
Ashok M Khandekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. During hearing, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to raise the same issue before the appropriate authority later. The Court, after hearing the …
Kalpesh Tanaji Kirve applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, his counsel sought to withdraw the application, stating that a notice under section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS Act) was being served to the applicant. The court …
Anand Rosari Fernandes filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, produced medical reports concerning the applicant, which were marked for identification. On the basis of these reports, the applicant's counsel sought leave to …
The original claimant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a first appeal against a judgment and award dated 6 October 2016 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (Original Application No. OA 185 of 2012). The applicant’s advocate requested urgent orders, but no …
Manish Kisan Mazgaonkar filed a writ petition on 17 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The appellants, Suryakant Varhade and Lalita Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, for allegedly planting a cannabis plant in the courtyard of their residence, under Sections 20(b)(i) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution’s case was based on a raid conducted after receiving …
The petitioners, Dnyaneshwar Narayan Doke and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 11 February 2019. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court’s recent …
The appellants were convicted for a bank dacoity under Sections 395 read with 397 and 342 read with 34 of the IPC, based primarily on a test identification parade. The prosecution alleged that the accused, armed with weapons, robbed a bank on 12 December 1995. The defense argued that the …
Chandrahas filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petition could be entertained despite the passage of time. It held that the cause of action had become extinct due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and others. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested unconditional leave to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous. The Court granted leave to …
Vilas Suryakant Mayekar filed a writ petition on 19 December 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record showed that neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court …
Petitioner Suresh Kumar Balkrishna Modi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer existed, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining basis to …
The petitioner, Kalamuddin Usman Shaikh, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after June 19, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The appellant, Ram Saket Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd., sought condonation of a 4,258‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an ex‑parte decree dated 10 April 2014. The delay stemmed from the society’s prolonged litigation under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which it pursued from 2014 until …
Applicants Ajay Kumar R Bhartiya and another filed an anticipatory bail application after being charged under multiple sections, which were later dropped, leaving only a charge under section 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, punishable by up to three years imprisonment. The applicants …
The petitioner, Rohit Prem Chhabra, filed a writ petition on 7 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that …
The petitioner, Manisha Uttam Kunde, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after 17 March 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
Ikhlak Ismail Modak filed Writ Petition No. 105 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 3 March 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking restoration of a decree. The applicant's counsel, Ms. Poonam Mittal, informed the court that the client was no longer pressing for restoration. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application. No substantive legal arguments or …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court …
Madhuri Pritam Choudhari filed Writ Petition No. 130 of 2019 on 8 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested …
The petitioner, Nandeepak Dayal Patade, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after June 11, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …
A writ petition (No. 141 of 2019) was filed by Aasma Mohammed Farooq & Anr. before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 4 February 2019, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 9 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. No substantive …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. It appears …
The vehicle owner appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s order that held both the owner and driver jointly and severally liable for a fatal pedestrian accident and refused to make the insurer liable despite an existing policy. The appellant contended that the insurer should be liable …
The petitioner, Noaman Kharodia, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the police filed a charge‑sheet, the petitioner contended that the petition had become infructuous and sought unconditional leave to withdraw it. The Court granted the petitioner's request for leave to withdraw …
The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Vishwanath Trivedi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel circulated the petition after May …
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after March 4, 2019, neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 18 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. Since filing, neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared for any hearing or took steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared disinterested in pursuing the matter. …
Baig Salim Abdul Razzak filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention. The State of Maharashtra, through its Additional Public Prosecutor, informed the Court that the petitioner had already been released after serving his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 316 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court. After a prolonged pendency since 2017, the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could be dismissed …
The petitioners failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after June 17, 2019. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Amjad Mohammad Harun Ansari filed Writ Petition No. 494 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court on 29 January 2019 against the Commissioner of Police, Thane City and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court …
The petitioner, Smt. Neela Ravindra Kamathe (deceased) represented through Lr. Madhumilind R. Kamthe, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner subsequently sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and found no legal impediment to …
The petitioners, Mrs. Sonali Ramdas Sasane and another, filed a criminal writ petition but failed to appear before the Court at any stage. The record shows that since 27 June 2016 the petitioners and/or their counsel took no steps to circulate the petition, and they were absent on the final date of …
The petitioner, Lalita Santosh Chawariya, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after June 17, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed a Tribunal order that awarded Rs.17,22,426 plus interest to Rohit Udayraj Pal & Anr. for injuries sustained in a motor accident. The insurer argued that the driver’s lack of a valid licence breached the policy and that the Tribunal should not award …
The petitioner, Deepa Trivedi, filed a writ petition on 17 December 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at any hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 December 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when called for hearing, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that …
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Madni Rashida S Abbas, appealed a decree that declared the respondent, Leena Francis D’Souza, as owner of certain premises and ordered the appellants to deliver vacant possession and pay monthly compensation. The trial court had found that the respondent’s …
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Madni Rashida S Abbas, appealed a decree that declared the respondent, Leena Francis D’Souza, as owner of certain premises and ordered the appellants to deliver vacant possession and pay monthly compensation. The trial court had found that the respondent’s …
Petitioner Balu Mukka Khair filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after 25 March 2019. The court observed that the …
Aishwarya Yogesh Joshi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 14 January 2019 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court …
Aparna Chandrakant Karve filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. As a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested …
Amol filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Inspector General and others. The petitioner was on furlough leave from Yerwada Open District Prison when he died on 16 November 2024, as reported by the jailor. The respondent State, through its counsel, submitted that …
The petitioner, Seema Shashikant Kalel, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after February 13, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. …
The petitioner, Amit Yogesh Sampat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the return of his passport. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition and instead file an application before the Sessions Court for the same relief. The Court considered …
The second appeal filed by Shantilal Bhikchand Surana challenged the first appellate court’s decree granting partition and separate possession of joint family property. The appellant argued that House No. JA‑2‑16/4 was in his wife’s name and thus not part of the joint family, relying on documents …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 638 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. After February 20, 2019, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared …
The petitioner, Jiendra Motwani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after July 1, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner, Shirley Naresh Rajwani, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a trial court order that allowed the defendants, Nensee Construction Pvt. Ltd. and others, to file a written statement despite a prior "no written statement" order dated 16 January 2014. The defendants had …
The petition was filed on 5 February 2019 by SRT Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. seeking relief, but the petitioner and its counsel made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Uday Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court of the death. The Court considered whether the petition could continue after the death of the …
Indus Towers Limited, a telecom infrastructure company, obtained permission from Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation to install a cellular tower in 2008. After complaints from local residents, the corporation issued a notice and the Ward Officer attempted to dismantle the equipment, prompting the …
Ashok Purushottam Bachuwar filed a writ petition on 12 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
Petitioner Kajal Manoj Misra filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal before the …
The petitioner, Irfan Hussain Ilfat Hussain Shaikh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 31, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court …
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) sought revision of a Civil Judge's order that rejected its application to dismiss a suit filed by Shivam Govendra Singh challenging two notices issued under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The plaintiff alleged the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 February 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Chetak Manohar Sheth, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 30 March 2022. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioners, Sachin Audumber Toraskar & Ors., filed Writ Petition No. 926 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 18, 2019, neither they nor their counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The Court noted the petitioners' apparent lack of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Sunita Vilas Gaonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 22 August 2018. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Mohd. Masood Alam, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after March 19, 2019. The court …
The petitioner, Amar Bama Mhatre, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 9, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The applicant, Swapnil Shivaji Bagal, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court considered the counsel's submission and examined whether a withdrawal of an anticipatory bail …
The petitioner, Samina Shaikh, filed a writ petition on 22 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner at the hearing, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor her advocate took any steps to advance the petition since its filing. The court observed that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The issue before the court was whether the …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 1038 of 2019 on 22 February 2019 seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. They failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record shows that from the filing date, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the …
The applicants filed an interim application seeking condonation of an 11‑day delay in filing an appeal against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dated 21 November 2025. The court noted that the notice was served on Respondent No.2 and that Respondent No.2 did not appear. The …
The applicant, Vishweshwar, was charged under Sections 376(2), 354, 354-A, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(l), 6, 7, 8 of the POCSO Act in a special POCSO case. He had already filed four bail applications before the trial court and sought a fifth bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
The petitioners, Tarmat Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the court that the cause of action for the petition no longer existed. The court accepted this submission and held that the petition had become infructuous. …
Petitioners Abhishek Dilip Kharkar and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel submitted that the dispute had been settled out of court and sought permission to withdraw the petition, attaching a copy of the consent terms. The court examined the submission and the …
Petitioner Seema Nitin Kalgutkar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. The judges granted …
The petition sought restoration of a writ petition challenging CIDCO's termination notice dated 24‑02‑2016 of a leave‑and‑license agreement for plot No.4‑A at Kharghar. The agreement, originally for 33 months with a possible 98‑month extension, prohibited sub‑letting and allowed termination on …
The petitioner, Rambhavu Nana Pathare, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after June 19, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, were allotted flats under a slum rehabilitation scheme but later received notices directing them to vacate, on the ground that their eligibility was unsatisfactory. They had previously been declared eligible in Annexure‑II and had taken possession of the flats …
The appellant, Michael Thomas Gracious, was ordered on 1 July 2024 to deposit 75% of a sum, but failed to comply despite repeated follow‑up by counsel. The appellant did not provide any instructions to his counsel, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court observed this …
The appellant, Michael Thomas Gracious, was ordered on 1 July 2024 to deposit 75% of a sum, but failed to comply despite repeated follow‑up by counsel. The appellant did not provide any instructions to his counsel, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court observed this …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The respondent State, represented by counsel, highlighted the petitioner's inaction. The Court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 11 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court inferred that the petitioner was not …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after April 24, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to take any steps to circulate the petition after 9 April 2019. The court noted that neither the petitioners nor their counsel pursued the matter further. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in …
Plaza Hotels Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition on 11 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No steps were taken by the petitioner or its counsel to advance the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed …
The appellants filed an interim application seeking a fresh notice to be issued to Respondent No. 1 at a new address. They also requested permission to amend the cause title of the civil application for condonation of delay and the second appeal to incorporate this new address. The court examined …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, …
Petitioner Vilas Suryakant Mayekar filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019. The petitioner was absent when called for hearing on 17 June 2026 and had not taken any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's absence and lack of any action to advance the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No …
The petitioner, Vilas Suryakant Mayekar, filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The respondent State of Maharashtra, represented by Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 13 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition at any …
The petitioner, Nazeer, filed a writ petition on 13 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or …
The petitioners, Members of Golden Isle CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition on 28 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No petitioner or counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing. The court noted that since filing, the petitioners made no effort to circulate the petition or pursue the …
The petitioner, Deepak Ganpat Devrukhhar, filed a writ petition on 13 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing dated 17 June 2026. The court noted that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate the petition. It …
The petitioner, Nalini Ashok Panchal, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither she nor her counsel circulated the petition after March 25, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Dr. Pranjali Omkar Jadhav, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after July 2, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. …
The petitioner, Salma Wahidulla Khan, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 20 March 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
A writ petition (No. 1472 of 2019) was filed by Vijendra Kumar Rai against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 10 April 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court …
The petitioner, Aliya Mojib Pinjari, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing when called. The court record shows that after 15 October 2025, neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It appears the …
The petitioner, Sonali Arvind Nadkarni, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. She failed to appear for the hearing and, after June 19, 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Rakesh Gupta filed Writ Petition No. 1504 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 3 April 2019, indicating a lack of …
The appellants filed an appeal against Order No. 476 of 2026 and raised Interim Application No. 3727 of 2026 seeking a correction in the judgment dated 17 June 2026. The application specifically requested that the word "India" in the last line of paragraph 23 be replaced with "Mumbai". The Court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 20 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to circulate the petition after filing. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 17 June 2026. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The appellant, M/s. Satec Envir Engineering (India) Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 709 of 2022. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant before the High Court. The Court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. No …
Tata Capital Limited (formerly Tata Motors Finances Limited) filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Ranvijay Kumar Singh and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition. The court entertained the request and permitted the withdrawal. …
The petitioner, Prem C. Somani, filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 17 January 2025. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition …
The petition filed by Mahakali Builders challenged a certificate of deemed conveyance of 288 sq. m. of land issued to Mayuresh Co-operative Housing Society. The builder argued that the original landowner had died without notice and that unutilised floor space index (FSI) remained, which it claimed …
Manish H. Milani filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after March 25, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and assault under Section 324 IPC, receiving life imprisonment and a three‑year rigorous imprisonment respectively, with both sentences to run concurrently. The conviction was based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's …
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and assault under Section 324 IPC, receiving life imprisonment and a three‑year rigorous imprisonment respectively, with both sentences to run concurrently. The conviction was based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's …
