Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 18201–18400
The petitioner, Mohan Nagu Kunchikorve, filed writ petition No.1628 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 2 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioners obtained six loans of Rs 20 lakh each from a cooperative credit society, totalling Rs 1.2 crore, by using five relatives as co‑borrowers. After default, the society sought recovery under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, and the Deputy Registrar issued …
The petitioners obtained loans of Rs.20,00,000 each from a cooperative credit society, totalling Rs.1,20,00,000, by involving five relatives as borrowers. After default, the society sought recovery under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and the Deputy Registrar issued …
The petitioner, Chandan Chittaranjan Sharma, filed a writ petition on 27 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Amol @ Avikumar Dhondiram Dhule, filed a writ petition on 28 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when called for hearing. The court noted that since the filing date, neither the petitioner nor his advocate has taken any …
Parwana Amardeep Co‑Operative Housing Society Ltd. filed a writ petition, but after 10 April 2019 neither the petitioner nor its counsel appeared or took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Mohammed Raza Khan, filed a writ petition on 26 March 2016 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. …
The Bombay High Court examined a writ petition filed by Aishwaryam Courtyard Phase-1 Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. challenging a Competent Authority order dated 28 November 2025. The Society alleged an inordinate delay of over a year between the closure of proceedings on 24 October 2024 and the …
The appellants, Mrs. Surinder Kaur Chhabara and Mr. Yashwant Sawant, appealed against the trial court’s order rejecting their interim injunction application in a suit concerning undivided shares of land originally owned by the late Merwan Feroze Cama. The suit sought specific performance of sale …
The petitioners filed a contempt petition in the High Court of Bombay. While a revision application was pending before the competent authority, the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No …
The applicant, Niranjan @ Niraj Narayan Khadsare, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the pendency of the application, the applicant was arrested. Counsel argued that the arrest rendered the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The Court considered this …
The petitioner, Glynis M. Sequeira, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after 23 July 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
In a writ petition (No. 4942 of 2002) before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners sought relief against the respondent. Two interim applications were filed: one to record a new trustee after the death of the previous trustee, and another to record the legal heirs of a deceased respondent. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 April 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.
The petitioner, Purshottam Bhaskar Mhatre, filed a writ petition on 4 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court observed that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court held that …
The petitioner, Mohammed Nihal Mohd. Maqsood, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 13 October 2023. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, …
A criminal writ petition (No. 2302 of 2026) was filed in the High Court of Bombay by Sonali Milind and others against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Niranjan Mundargi and a team of counsel from Trilegal. The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ …
Ashwini Sagar Pawar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel later sought leave to withdraw the application. The court considered the counsel's submission and permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was withdrawn …
Gajanan Rajaram Nagarkar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 18 April 2019 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained inactive as the petitioner and his counsel made no attempts to circulate or advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing and, after April 26, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Mahesh Kissan Motewar, Director of Samruddha Jeevan Multi State Multi Purpose Cooperative Society, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After filing, the petitioner and his counsel failed to circulate the petition or take any further steps after 9 July 2019. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18th April 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
The applicants, Utsarg Shambhunarayan Singh and others, filed a criminal revision application against Anchal Utsarg Singh and another respondent. During the hearing, both parties informed the court that they had settled the dispute. The applicants' counsel, Dr. Samarth Shrikant Karmarkar, requested …
The petitioner, Shiva Ramanna Shetty, filed a writ petition on 23 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court noted …
Azam Aslam Butt filed a writ petition (No. 2427 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court on 24 April 2019. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
Pravya Gems filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2698 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later informed the court that the dispute had been settled out of court and sought permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the …
Uday Vishnu Panchabhai filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1195 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. The applicant, through counsel Satyajeet Dighe, sought permission to withdraw the application and to file a fresh one before the Sessions Court. The State, represented by M. M. Deshmukh, …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting their application for condonation of delay in filing a revision against a 2021 magistrate order. They argued that the delay of about 100 days was caused by the advanced age (94 years) of one …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but the court had not been able to serve notice to the respondents because spare copies of the notice were not supplied. The petitioner later withdrew his brief and gave no objection to another advocate filing a …
The petitioner, Mr. R. B. Yadav, a member of the Ramnath Cooperative Housing Society, filed a private complaint under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that respondent No.3 forged documents to obtain membership and an alternate accommodation allotment. The Metropolitan …
A writ petition (No. 2529 of 2019) was filed by Priyanka Santosh Shete against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court of the death and submitted that the petition stood abated. The court …
The petitioner, Mamta Shri Prakash Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the investigation in criminal case No. 731 of 2017 registered at Wakad Police Station. The petitioner alleged that her daughter did not support the allegations in the FIR. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor informed …
The applicant, Nityanand Hirappa Ayappol, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The prosecution indicated that about twelve witnesses would be examined and the trial would be concluded within eighteen months. On this basis, the applicant’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail …
The petitioners, owners of CTS No.114 in Koregaon Park, sought to develop the land for residential use but discovered it was reserved for a playground (Reservation PG‑97) in the Revised Draft Development Plan under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. A committee appointed under …
The petitioner, Shree Yamai Devi Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition on 3 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhay Bijay Beero, accused of possessing 22.2 kg of ganja under Sections 8(c) read with 20(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution argued that the entire quantity constituted commercial quantity, invoking the bar under Section 37, while …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 2 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for any hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel showed no interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court held that the …
Meena Bhimanand Sonavane filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 3 May 2019. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. …
The petitioners, Kamlakar Shankar Pawar & Anr., challenged a notice dated 2 April 2019 issued by the Malegaon Municipal Corporation alleging unauthorized structures. The corporation was directed to act on the notice and take appropriate enforcement action within eight weeks, provided there were no …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 7 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this …
The appellant, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, filed a civil application seeking a stay of the tribunal's order dated 4 February 2019. The application requested that the order be stayed pending the disposal of the appeal, provided the appellant deposited the decree amount with interest. …
The petitioner, Jalinder Mahadev Dhekale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioners, a group of temporary and casual workers of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, sought review of a judgment that denied them any continuing right of employment under Clause 4 of a 2002 circular. They argued that the clause guaranteed their right to remain in post even if …
The petitioner, Dhiren Dungarshi Shah, filed a writ petition on 5 April 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The court noted that since filing, the petitioner and his advocate made no effort to advance or circulate the petition. It …
A writ petition was filed on 16 May 2019 by Hafiz Abdul Bari Khan against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 16 May 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. No substantive …
Mohd Shahjad Mallik filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was examined by a two‑judge bench. The court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the cause of action for filing the petition had become …
Kunda Kulkarni filed a writ petition on 17 May 2019 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 May 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the record shows that the petition was never circulated or pursued. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing …
The petitioner, Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 3, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Rekha Mistry filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 27 November 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The applicants, Pradeep Valjibai Parmar and an associate, filed Interim Application No. 1659 of 2026 seeking permission to travel to and reside in Australia for one year while a criminal appeal (No. 848 of 2009) filed by the State of Maharashtra remains pending. The appeal challenges an acquittal …
The petitioner, Ravsaheb Dattu Shingate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after July 1, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Ujwla Santosh Yede, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after July 24, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking quash of an FIR registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing they were informed that they had been dropped from the charge‑sheet. On that basis they applied to withdraw the criminal application. The …
The applicant, Amit Nagoji Pote, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving alleged murder, attempt to murder and conspiracy (IPC Sections 302, 201, 120‑B read with 34). The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the …
The applicant, Pankaj Prabhakar Baviskar, was arrested for alleged fraud involving investment schemes and charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 sections 3 and 4. He has been in custody for over two years without trial, despite the …
Ramdulare Murat Sharma filed Writ Petition No. 2828 of 2019 on 16 May 2019 against Senior Inspector of Police and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The appellant, Mr. Bans Bahadur Jaiswal, filed a special civil suit seeking a declaration that a notice issued by MHADA under Sections 52 and 53(1) of the MRTP Act was illegal and to restrain demolition of his alleged premises (CTS No.1‑2, Survey No.42). MHADA contended that the notice concerned an …
Sunil Koksingh Rajput filed writ petition No. 2836 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after 21st December 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Avinash Rajaram Kalokhe, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 10 March 2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, which authorized the issuance of process against him. The petitioner alleged that the respondent altered …
The Shree Safalya Co-operative Housing Society filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order of deemed conveyance dated 27 May 2015. The petition was essentially identical to Writ Petition No.8070 of 2025, the only distinction being that the conveyance instrument had not yet been registered. …
Ms. Chanchal Singh and Mrs. Putladevi filed separate criminal bail applications before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel, Mr. S.T. Pandey, sought leave to withdraw both applications, citing a change in circumstances and the intention to file fresh applications before the trial court. The Court, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 3 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the court …
The petitioner, Aruna Prashant Chakraborti, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. As a …
The petition concerned the dismissal of a driver who was also a union office‑bearer after allegations that he used vulgar, derogatory language towards women of the Koli community and refused duties. The Labour Court had upheld the dismissal, finding the misconduct proved, while the Industrial Court …
The High Court of Bombay heard counsel for Wheelabrator Alloy Castings Ltd. (appellant) and Mrs. Nirmala Khandelwal & ors. (respondents). Both sides jointly submitted that they were exploring an amicable settlement. The court, at the joint request of counsel, adjourned the matter to 12 August 2026. …
The petitioner, Syed Hasan Madaar, filed a writ petition on 15 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The Court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief. The issue …
The petitioners challenged the authorization granted to Respondent No.6 by Respondent No.5 (a society) to vote in the society's elections, alleging that Respondent No.6 was a defaulter of Rs.97,00,000. Examination of the society's records revealed that only Rs.15,00,000 was outstanding, which …
The petitioner, Aanchal Dharmendra Sajnani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 17, 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
Mangesh Dipak Kalokhe applied under Section 528 of the BNSS for relaxation of bail condition 2(a) which required him to deposit Rs.2,00,000 as a pre‑condition for release. The Additional Judge of the Special Court, MCOCA, Pune had imposed the condition despite granting bail, and the lower court …
The petitioners, Kamlakar Shankar Pawar & Anr., challenged a notice dated 2 April 2019 issued by the Malegaon Municipal Corporation alleging unauthorized structures. The corporation was directed to act on the notice and take appropriate enforcement action within eight weeks, provided there were no …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking a stay of the order dated 16 September 2015 passed against it. The applicant contended that the decretal amount had been deposited, warranting a stay of the impugned order until the appeal is finally decided. The court examined the …
Mangesh Tukaram Padwal filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing a revision application against Sunita Mangesh Padwal. The applicant argued that the delay was justified, while the respondent opposed condonation. The Court, after hearing both sides, considered the …
In Criminal Writ Petition No. 1675 of 2026, the Applicants sought relief from costs imposed on certain family members (Applicants Nos. 4 and 6) who were not named as accused but were parties due to a settlement. The Applicants' counsel, Mr. Azharuddin Khan, explained that the omission of this fact …
The petitioner challenged the Municipal Corporation's attempt to force acceptance of TDR/FSI as compensation for land acquired for road widening and to demolish alleged unauthorised construction. The High Court had earlier ordered the corporation not to take coercive action. Despite that, the …
The applicants, Jaykumar Rampyare Yadav & Ors., filed an interim application seeking leave to amend their writ petition and to produce the charge‑sheet on record in a criminal appellate matter before the High Court of Bombay. The State of Maharashtra, represented by Ms. S. G. Talhar, did not oppose …
Dilip Waman Mhatre filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petition listed Ravi Waman Mhatre and others as respondents, with Ms. Ankita Rathod of S.K. Legal Associates LLP appearing for Respondent No.3. The court observed that the appearance of Respondent No.1 required correction …
The petitioners challenged the acquisition of land for the widening of a National Highway. They later submitted a letter offering a settlement to the Collector, which the Collector accepted, proposing to dispose of the writ petition on those terms. Both parties filed affidavits confirming the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 20 June 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and took no steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The respondents, represented by Ashish I. Satpute, argued …
Petitioner Dhiraj Singh filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after March 5, 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. The issue …
The petitioner, Dr. Deepali Pankaj Athavale, filed a writ petition on 17 June 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 24 June 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and took no steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Ceat Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging orders of the Labour and Industrial Courts concerning compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased employee, Dayaram K. Yadav. The parties negotiated an amicable settlement whereby Ceat Ltd. agreed to pay a lump‑sum sum of Rs.10,00,000 to the widow, Smt. …
The petitioner, Anil Premchand Kanjani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court record shows that after 25 February 2020, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It appears the petitioner was not …
The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after October 9, 2019. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
The petitioners, claiming to be sisters of certain respondents, challenged a permission granted by the Special Divisional Officer under Section 43 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act to sell joint family land to a nephew. They filed a revision before the Maharashtra Revenue …
Rashida Abdul Majid Ansari filed writ petition No. 3546 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 15 March 2021, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The applicant, Abhijit Ashok Talwalkar, challenged the Assistant Sessions Judge's order rejecting his discharge application in a case where the deceased, a tenant, allegedly committed suicide due to harassment and financial pressure from the applicant and co‑accused. The prosecution relied on a …
Deepak Bhargava filed Criminal Revision Application No.346 of 2017, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on 19 January 2024 for non‑prosecution. He subsequently filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 482‑day delay in filing the revision and restoration of the dismissed …
The petitioner, Nitin Ashok Maniyar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Kalpesh Piyush Sanghavi filed a writ petition on 18 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. …
Janardhan Abaso Kedari filed a writ petition (No. 3753 of 2019) in the High Court of Bombay against the Commissioner of Police, Pune City and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called out for hearing. The record shows that after 28 August 2019 neither the petitioner nor his advocate took …
Avarsekar Realty Private Limited filed Writ Petition No. 3763 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 14 August 2019, neither the petitioner nor its counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court …
Aishwarya Yogesh Joshi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 14 January 2019 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested …
Kusum Jaiswar filed a writ petition challenging an order issued by a magistrate, which the respondent argued was a process order only reviewable by a criminal revision under Section 438 of the BNSS 2023. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition and instead file a criminal revision, …
The applicants/appellants, Saeed Ali and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing their appeal against K. R. Construction & Anr. The court noted that the appeal had been filed beyond the prescribed period. The applicants submitted reasons for the delay as recorded in …
The petitioner, Chandan Chittaranjan Sharma, filed a writ petition on 27 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. Neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared for the hearing nor took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Harinder Surinder Bagai filed a writ petition (No. 11195 of 2025) in the Bombay High Court against Rukmani Bagai. The petitioner, through counsel Gaurav Srivastav, later sought leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent, Rukmani Bagai, was represented by counsel Taubon F. Irani and her team. The …
The appellants filed a suit seeking a declaration and injunction that the Maharashtra State Electricity Board should not charge excessive amounts for electricity consumption. The trial court and the first appellate court found that the plaintiffs had not produced sufficient documentary evidence to …
The Pune Housing and Area Development Board (the Board) sought a writ under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution to set aside an order of the Appellate Officer that dismissed the Board's appeal and allowed the respondent's appeal, thereby staying an eviction order. The dispute concerned a flat …
The appellant filed an interim application in the Bombay High Court seeking to bring the legal heirs of the deceased original respondent, Bharati Parekh, onto the record of the appeal. Bharati Parekh died on 6 May 2025, leaving three heirs: Rajanikant Parekh, Sheetal Kapadia, and Tushar Parekh. The …
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) sought revision of a Civil Judge's order that rejected its application to dismiss a suit filed by Shivam Govendra Singh challenging two notices issued under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The plaintiff alleged the …
Petitioner Chetan Ramesh Gomta filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an FIR. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that the FIR had already been registered and that he wished to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the State opposed no point. …
Baig Salim Abdul Razzak filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention. The State of Maharashtra, through its Additional Public Prosecutor, informed the Court that the petitioner had already been released after serving his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners, street vendors licensed for Vending Zone No. 216 in Pune, challenged the Pune Municipal Corporation's attempt to remove their carts during footpath repairs, invoking protection under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. The …
The petitioner, Jagannath Laxman Jadhav, sought a stay of recovery proceedings initiated by Shri Kulswami Co‑Op Credit Society Ltd. under a Recovery Certificate issued pursuant to Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, after defaulting on a loan of Rs 50 million. He claimed …
M/s. Perfect Enterprise & Anr. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners, through counsel, later filed a praecipe on 12 June 2026 indicating their desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the …
The petitioners, Devidas Ganpat Kuchekar & Ors., were directed by the High Court on 17 June 2026 to deposit a cost of Rs.10,000 each with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa's Advocate Academy and Research Center. On the petition, they submitted electronic receipts and a UPI transaction …
The petitioner, Sagar Sanjay Garud, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Manmad City Police Station and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through his counsel Mr. Virendra V. Pethe, communicated that he no longer wished to pursue the petition. The …
Revati Alias Sapana Ranjit Pawar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Ranajit Murlidhar Pawar and others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. Since the settlement resolved all issues, the court found that no relief remained …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a civil suit. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the underlying suit had been disposed of on 9 September 2021, rendering the writ petition moot. The court took note of the order of disposal of the suit. Since the suit …
The petitioner, Balkrishna, filed Writ Petition No. 3208 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Rupesh Jaiswal and Anjali Raut, decided not to pursue the existing petition. He sought the …
The petitioners, Zingubai Haribhau Galande and anr., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondent, Daryus Soleey Panthakey. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the grievance no longer subsisted and that they wished to …
The petitioner challenged a 4 January 2018 order of the Grievance Redressal Committee that dismissed his appeal and held him ineligible. After that order, eviction proceedings were initiated, leading to a fresh inquiry and a subsequent order dated 8 June 2026 declaring the petitioner eligible. The …
The State of Maharashtra filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 205‑day delay in filing a petition for leave to appeal an acquittal granted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in a case involving offences under Sections 302, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The delay arose …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 5375 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The court scheduled hearings on 6 April 2026 and 23 April 2026, but no party appeared on either date. The court noted that even on the final date of 17 June 2026, neither the …
The applicant, Bhau Nana Chavan, was arrested in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 of the IPC and sought bail under Section 439 of the CrPC. The trial court granted bail on 3 February 2024, conditioning the applicant to deposit Rs.5 lakh within two months. The …
Mukesh Bhandari filed Interim Application No. 4031 of 2025 in the High Court of Bombay seeking leave to unconditionally withdraw the application. The applicant was represented by Ms. Anushka Jain and Ms. Mittal Munoth, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Mrs. Rajeshree Newton. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. C.R. No.7 of 2018 registered at Vishrambaug Police Station for alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 472 read with 34, alleging diversion of funds with K.K. Enterprises. The respondents contended that the …
The High Court noted that First Appeal No. 111 of 2025 had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 06/03/2025. Consequently, the Interim Application No. 262 of 2025, which sought a stay of that dismissal, could not survive. The court therefore disposed of the interim application without granting …
The writ petition filed by Sumit Ravindra Chandane in 2018 remained pending for several years. The last listing was on 1 February 2019, after which neither the petitioner nor his counsel took steps to have the matter listed. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in …
The HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order that awarded Rs.5,06,763 plus 9% interest to the claimant, Ganesh Arjun Ladkat, for injuries sustained in a road accident. The insurer argued that the vehicle driver lacked a valid licence, constituting a breach …
The Bombay High Court, acting suo moto, reviewed the minutes of its order dated 17 June 2026. It identified a clerical mistake in clause (viii) of the operative part where the term "six months" was used. The Court directed that this phrase be corrected to read "60 days". No other part of the order …
Gorakh Hiraman Jadhav filed Civil Writ Petition No. 1994 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The respondents were represented by Smt. Neha Bhide and Smt. Leena Patil. The Court …
Pramod Kumar Sitaram Jha filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Mr. Heramb Pawar, appeared and sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. The application was consequently …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority that had dismissed complaints by homebuyers against Esque Finmark and Macrotech, directing the developers to execute sale agreements and deliver possession. The developers argued they …
The applicant, Sagar Daji Beluse, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay. The prosecution informed the court that the trial was scheduled to commence that day, with the victim in custody and eight witnesses to be examined, and that the trial would be concluded within one year. On this …
Mangesh Vasudev Barhate had earlier filed a criminal bail application which was denied, leading him to withdraw it with permission to reapply after a year if the trial stalled. The trial is scheduled for 14 July 2026 and the prosecution expects to complete it within three months. The applicant now …
The appellant, Lata Dadabhau Ponde, claimed possession of a shop premises based on a leave and licence agreement executed with Pannadevi Shyamsunder Khandelwal, partner of the lessee M/s. Poorna Warehousing Corporation, for a three‑year term starting 1 October 2001. The licence term had expired, yet …
The appellant, originally Defendant No.1, claimed continued possession of a shop premises based on a leave and licence agreement executed with the lessee's partner, which was set for three years starting 1 October 2001. The licence term had unequivocally expired, and the appellant persisted in …
The petitioner, Liladhar Manikrao Duphare, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to execute an order dated 6 January 2025 passed by the 6th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC, Belapur. The issue before the Court was whether a writ petition is the appropriate remedy for enforcing that …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside orders of the MAHARERA that dismissed complaints by homebuyers against Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Esque Finmark Pvt. Ltd., directing execution of sale agreements and delivery of possession. The appellants argued they were improperly made …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking directions to serve notices on Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, whose addresses were unknown and the earlier notices had been returned unserved. The Registrar listed the matter three times and directed the applicant’s counsel to provide correct addresses …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioner, Rohan Nayan Shah, challenged a notice and order of assessment for AY 2015-16 issued by the Income Tax authorities. The petitioner argued that the assessment and any subsequent re‑assessment, demand or penalty notices were unlawful. The Court observed that the matter fell within the …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioner Shubhada R. Bora filed multiple writ petitions challenging notices, reassessment orders, demand and penalty notices issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik. The Court noted that these petitions would be decided in accordance with the precedent set in Hexaware Technologies …
Zentest Software Private Limited filed several writ petitions challenging income tax notices and assessment orders for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, alleging that the sanction for assessment was improperly obtained. The Court relied on its earlier decision in Siemens Financial Services Private Limited v. …
The petitioner Shubhada R. Bora filed multiple writ petitions challenging notices, reassessment orders, demand and penalty notices issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Nashik. The Court noted that these petitions would be decided in accordance with the precedent set in Hexaware Technologies …
The Bombay High Court dealt with a large batch of writ petitions (WP 3641/2022 and many others) all concerning the Assessment Year 2015-16. Petitioners challenged notices, reassessment orders, demand and penalty notices issued by the Income Tax authorities. The Court observed that the matters are …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that such notices should have been issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) in accordance with the scheme under Section 151A. The Court referred to its earlier …
A series of writ petitions filed by various taxpayers challenged income‑tax notices, demand notices, penalty notices and re‑assessment orders for different assessment years. The petitioners argued that the orders were illegal and sought their quashing. The Court observed that the matters fall within …
The applicant, Narshi Kanji Nakrani, filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay. Counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the bail application, citing a change in circumstances and the intention to file a fresh application before the trial court. The court considered whether it …
The applicant, Mohammed Salim Ali Hasan Khan, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court. The prosecution indicated it would examine up to five witnesses and aim to conclude the trial within nine months. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting …
The petitioner, Gharpure Engineering Vasai Virar STP Private Limited, sought the appointment of a second arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the respondent, Vasai Virar City Municipal Corporation, failed to make a balance payment promised on 22 April …
The applicant, Deepak Girdharilal Matai, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Niranjan Shimpi, submitted a written request to withdraw the pending proceedings. The court recorded the request and considered whether it should grant leave to …
The petitioner, Narmada Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner later instructed its counsel, Mr. Rohan P. Surve, to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The written instruction was tendered and marked for identification. The Court …
The petitioners Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Pandurang Narayan Tapkir filed arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator and the deletion of certain respondents. The respondents argued that the partnership firm had …
The appellant, Polar Textiles and Fabrics Private Limited, filed an appeal against Order No. 277 of 2021 passed by the High Court of Bombay. The appellant, through counsel Ms. Namrata Vashisht, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The sole issue before the Court was whether the …
Harbhajan Singh B. Ajimal filed an interim application in a writ petition seeking to record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent Jiledar Singh Parasnath Singh. The respondents, represented by Advocate D. Mishra, raised no objection to the filing of the application. The Court examined whether …
Narayan Yajindar Bhosale was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murdering his daughter by pouring kerosene on her and setting her ablaze, allegedly over a dowry dispute following her inter‑caste marriage. After serving more than twelve years in custody, he filed an interim bail …
The petitioner, Ashok Shripat Bharati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order passed by a Competent Magistrate under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner argued that the order was …
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Samyak Welfare Association on the ground of non‑prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after March 4, 2019, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Kanchan, sought to recall the order dismissing her writ petition for default and to restore the petition, citing reasons for non‑appearance and unpaid costs by the respondents. She also moved to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent and to amend …
The Bombay High Court considered a praecipe filed by the appellants seeking a stay of its own order dated 12 June 2026, which had vacated an interim injunction concerning Survey No. 73/2B. The court examined the arguments of both sides, noting that the respondents' counsel had previously taken a …
The appellant, Ali Waris, appealed an order refusing ad‑interim relief against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The High Court noted that the notice of motion itself was listed for hearing on 14 July 2026 and directed the parties to present arguments on that date. The Court ordered the …
The appellant, Ali Waris, appealed an order refusing ad‑interim relief against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The High Court noted that the notice of motion itself was listed for hearing on 14 July 2026 and directed the parties to present arguments on that date. The Court ordered the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Trial Court. While the petition was pending, the underlying civil suit was finally disposed by an order dated 2 May 2024. The respondent argued that the disposal of the suit rendered the writ petition infructuous. The High …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order passed by the Trial Court. While the writ petition was pending, the underlying civil suit before the Trial Court was finally disposed on 2 May 2024. The respondent's counsel argued that the disposal of the suit rendered the writ …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the trial court. While the petition was pending, the underlying suit before the trial court was disposed on 11 July 2024. The respondent argued that the disposal of the suit rendered the writ petition infructuous. The court …
The petitioner, Surendraprasad Suryanarayan Pandey, filed a writ petition challenging an interim order passed by the trial court. The respondent, Shantidevi Mrutunjay Mishra, was represented by Advocate A. A. Khan. The respondent argued that the underlying civil suit, which formed the basis of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26 November 2025 issued by the Revisional Authority under Section 23 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906, which had set aside the Mamlatdar’s order under Section 5 dismissing the respondents’ application for removal of obstruction and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 2 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record showed that the petitioner made no effort to advance the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested …
The petitioners, who are defendants in a 2006 civil suit for recovery of Rs.18,00,771.72, challenged three orders of the trial court that closed evidence and barred cross‑examination because the defendants and their counsel were absent. They argued that the orders were harsh, especially given the …
The applicant, Mohammed Jakir Hussain Shaikh, has been in jail for two years on alleged charges under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a criminal bail application, but his counsel sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to re‑file after fifteen months if the trial is not …
The petitioner, Lalita Chunnilal Nayak, filed a writ petition but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after July 30, 2018. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the …
The Saraswat Co‑op. Bank Ltd, a multi‑state cooperative bank, sought to dismiss a summary suit filed by Mulani Associates for recovery of professional fees for valuation services, arguing that the suit fell within Section 115 of the Multi‑State Co‑operative Societies Act, 2002 which requires prior …
The appellant Khandu Kondaji Dongare filed Criminal Appeal No. 622 of 2009 against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant sought leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal in view of subsequent developments. The Court considered the request and examined …
The applicant, Pavan Madan Sonparakhe, sought anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act for allegedly acting as a pimp. The prosecution claimed that a police raid on a hotel rescued victims and that …
Vaishali Anil Tikam filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The investigating officer, through the Assistant Police Inspector, sought to issue a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS to the applicant. The applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the …
The appeal concerned the right, title and interest in a suit property slated for acquisition by the Municipal Corporation for road widening. The appellant, who is also the original plaintiff, argued that despite a pending title suit, he should be allowed to participate in the acquisition proceedings …
The appeal concerned the right, title and interest in a property slated for acquisition by the Municipal Corporation for road widening. The appellant, who is also the original plaintiff in a pending title suit, sought permission to participate in the acquisition proceedings and submit ownership …
Both criminal writ petitions (WP No. 2287 of 2026 and WP No. 2288 of 2026) were filed by the petitioners against the Intelligence Officer, Central Intelligence Unit, Mumbai. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that the purpose of filing the petitions had been achieved. …
M/s. Siddhivinayak Kohinoor Vastu and its partners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners alleged that a suit pending before the court clerk had not been disposed of. Upon examination, the court clerk’s records indicated that the …
The High Court of Bombay considered a civil revision application filed by Ram Mahal Co‑Operative Housing Society against Ravi Joseph Pereira and others. The applicant sought condonation of delay in filing the first appeal, which the court granted. Counsel for the applicant indicated that the parties …
The Padmavati Nagar Co‑operative Housing Society resolved to terminate its developer and, during a special meeting of its Managing Committee on 15 April 2026, passed a no‑confidence motion against its Chairman (Petitioner No.2). The motion was adopted by six votes out of nine members present, and …
The petitioner, Rajendra Ramchandra Agarwal, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the application, stating that a notice under section 35(3) of the BNSS had been served on the petitioner. The …
The petitioner, Shevantibai Yashwant Barad, failed to appear for the hearing of her writ petition and, according to the record, made no effort to advance the petition since its filing on 17 May 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, …
Abdul Afsar Salam Khan filed an appeal (No. 424 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court, comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, issued a notice to respondents numbered 2 to 6, directing that it be returned by 24 July 2026. …
The applicant, Manoj Ankush Gawali, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences under IPC Sections 302, 323 and 34. He had previously been granted regular bail in March 2018, but failed to appear for trial, leading to a non‑bailable warrant and his …
The applicant, Sohel Ahmed Ekhlak Ahmed, filed a bail application for C.R. No. 120 of 2024 under sections 8(c) and 22(c) of the NDPS Act. He later sought permission to withdraw this bail application and to file a fresh bail petition before the trial court, relying on a liberty previously granted by …
The Bombay High Court heard a consolidated group of 28 writ petitions filed by individual shop and house owners whose structures were demolished by Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) for road‑widening. The petitioners sought permission to reconstruct their demolished premises, alternate accommodation …
The Court considered a praecipe filed by counsel Mr. Jatin Karia (Shah) on behalf of the applicants seeking correction of typographical errors in the order dated 12 June 2026. The petition highlighted the omission of Advocate Mr. Janmesh Vora’s name in the appearance section and the erroneous …
Satish Krishna Pujari appealed against his conviction in CBI Special Cases 35/2011 and 36/2012, where he was found guilty of several IPC offences and sentenced to up to three years imprisonment. He sought suspension of the substantive sentence pending final disposal of the appeal, arguing that he …
The applicant, Sunil Dutt Sharma, filed a criminal revision application (Revn No. 228 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the trial court, along with an interim application (CRI‑Interim No. 1771 of 2026). During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought leave to …
The writ petition filed by Navkiran Power Loom Owners Industrial Co‑Operative Society Ltd was admitted in 2006 but no interim orders were made and the case remained pending. The petitioner failed to pursue the matter, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the Court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave and ordered the petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any costs. The related …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, but after February 7, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges noted the lack of …
The Bombay High Court, on a petition filed by Swapnil Shankar Yashvant Kaudare, noted that the petitioner's appearance on 12 June 2026 was not recorded. The court ordered that the earlier order dated 12 June 2026 be corrected to include the name of the petitioner's counsel, M. S. Lad, and to delete …
The petitioner, Pradeep Nanubhai Paghdal, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after April 15, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the …
The Bombay High Court, in Writ Petition No. 2872 of 2018, issued a procedural order directing the Registry to comply with a prior order dated 24 July 2018. The court instructed that compliance be effected within two weeks from the date of the order, i.e., by 26 June 2026. The order also directed the …
Petitioners Chetan Narendra Dhakan & Ors filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, they applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave, ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, and consequently disposed of …
JSW Steel Coated Product Ltd. filed a civil revision application against John Cockerill India Ltd. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had been dismissed as withdrawn by the trial court, rendering the revision application moot. The High Court accepted this submission …
Petitioner Kishore Shankar Singnapurkar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous, without …
The petitioner, Hanumant Govind Chandgude, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 8 April 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance or circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
