Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 18601–18800

ZABBAR ASIF MOVARversusTHE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioner, Zabbar Asif Movar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 September 2025 issued by the District Magistrate of Diu under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act. The petition argued that the order failed to specify a detention period and did not disclose any …

MEDHA SHAMRAJ PATHAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 349/2025 registered at Panchvati Police Station, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice Act, on the ground that the dispute was a matrimonial one that had been amicably …

ANKUSH R SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Ankush R Singh and others, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 6286 of 2025 and Interim Application No. 1576 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court. After the trial court passed certain orders, the petitioners, through Senior Advocate Majeed Memon, sought leave to withdraw both the writ …

SISHIRKUMAR GOPALCHANDRA PADHY (PADI)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The appellant, Sishirkumar Padhy, was convicted for murder (IPC 302) and criminal intimidation (IPC 452) after a woman was stabbed in her home. He claimed he had tried to chase the assailant and reported the incident to police, but the trial court relied on CCTV footage, recovered weapons, a dying …

SANJOY SHIVDAS MUKHERJEEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The accused, Sanjoy Shivdas Mukherjee, filed Criminal Bail Application No. 2391 of 2023 seeking relaxation of a condition that required his regular attendance at the police station, a condition imposed on 6 October 2023. The prosecution opposed the relaxation, proposing that the accused appear only …

APL YASHOMANGAL DEVELOPERS AND ANRversusYASHWANT DASHRATH SAWANT AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Yashomangal Developers & Anr., filed Writ Petition No. 685 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging an order arising from earlier civil proceedings. The petitioners later informed the Court that the original civil suit had been finally decided because the parties had amicably …

ASHIWNI RAJENDRA CHAVAIversusRAJENDRA BALASAHEB CHAVAI

Disposed Off

The wife (applicant) sought transfer of her pending divorce proceedings from the Principal Family Court, Sangli to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, citing her residence in Pune with her parents and minor son and the respondent's non‑payment of maintenance. The husband (respondent), employed in …

SHRI. TUSHAR SHIVAJI THORAT AND ANRversusSMT. ANJANI ATMARAM SHIRSAT DECD THRU LR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Shri Tushar Shivaji Thorat, filed Writ Petition No. 4076 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging the suit filed by the respondents. While the suit was pending, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the petition. The Court, after …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASTRA

Disposed Off

The victim filed an interim application seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused on the condition that the accused not act as a counsellor until further order of the trial court. The accused’s counsel argued that the accused had provided counselling via video conferencing, alleging a …

DNYANESHWAR BALU SHELARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Balu Shelar, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 101.88 kg of cannabis from a car on 18 March 2024. The prosecution alleged that the seized material, comprising leaves, seeds, stalks and stems, constituted "ganja" under the NDPS Act and sought to deny bail. The …

SMT.ANAGHA A. KHANDKAR and ORS.versusMARULLA B. PATHAN and ORS.

Dismissed

The appellants, Smt. Anagha A. Khandkar and others, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court against the respondents, Marulla B. Pathen and others. The appellants were represented by Ms. Neeta Patil, instructed by Mr. S.R. Nargolkar. No further instructions or pleadings were received from …

NILESH @ TUSHAR ASHOK BORSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Nilesh @ Tushar Ashok Borse, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 101 kg 880 g of cannabis from a car intercepted by police on 18 March 2024. The prosecution alleged that the seized material constituted a commercial quantity of "ganja" under the NDPS Act, justifying denial …

ARUN JACOB REBERIOversusP.C.GANDHI AND ASSOCIATES (OWNER) AND ORS.

Dismissed

Arun Jacob Reberio filed a first appeal (No. 1431 of 2002) against P.C. Gandhi and Associates and others. The appellant and the cross‑objectors failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled dates of 11 March 2026 and 30 April 2026. The Court, noting the non‑appearance, issued an order that if …

Suryadeep MalhotraversusUnion of India

Disposed Off

The applicant filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the proceedings remained inactive. The court noted the lack of prosecution of the application. Consequently, the court dismissed …

ARJUN LALCHAND VISHWAKARMA AND ORSversusTILAK KHETSHI SHAH AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners Arjun Lalchand Vishwakarma and others filed a writ petition challenging the execution of a decree concerning possession of suit premises. The respondents, Tilak Khetshi Shah and others, contended that the decree had already been executed and possession was in the hands of the …

ANIL GAJANAN MANEversusTHE THANE JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED

Dismissed

The petitioner, a former peon of Shri Sadguru Jangli Maharaj Bank, claimed unfair labour practice and was granted permanency in 2001. He was terminated in 1999 and later sought reinstatement with back wages, but the Labour Court ordered reinstatement without back wages or, alternatively, …

MSTC LIMITEDversusShri Ishar Alloy Steels Limited

Allowed

MSTC Limited, a government company, filed an application to restore its earlier leave to appeal (ST) No. 639 of 2019 and a related delay‑condonation application (No. 1410 of 2019) which had been dismissed for default on 9 January 2026. The restoration application was filed 15 days late, and the …

SHAHAJI MADHUKAR JADHAVversusALICON CASTALLOY LTD.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, former employees of Alicon Castalloy Ltd., challenged their termination on grounds of alleged submission of a forged B.A. certificate. They argued that the departmental enquiry denied them the right to legal representation, relied on an unexamined handwriting expert report, and …

Mrs Nirmakumari Aakash PurohitversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mrs. Nirmakumari Aakash Purohit, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No submissions or evidence were presented on behalf of the applicant. The respondent was represented by Mr. S. S. Ghag, Advocate. The Court …

SANJAY HARIRAM AGARWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sanjay Hariram Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 21 March 2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 37th Court, which framed charges under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 114, 120B and 34. The petitioner argued that the facts were identical to those …

DR KUMUD PATEL AND ASSOCIATES AND ORSversusKUMUD MANGALDAS PATEL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicants, Dr. Kumud Patel & Associates and others, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the Bombay High Court seeking an extension of time to carry out an amendment as directed by the Court on 30 April 2026. The applicants, through counsel Tanjul Sharma (appearing on behalf of Dhruve …

ROHITAS PARAMHANS PATHAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners Ratnakar Dubey, Rohitas Pathak, Sushil Tiwari and others were charged under Crime No. 920 of 2019 by the State of Maharashtra. They filed criminal writ petitions (Nos. 3815, 3816, 3817 of 2023 and ST 5546 of 2026) seeking quash of the FIR, contending that the matter had been settled …

SUSHIL RADHEYMOHAN TIWARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners Ratnakar Dubey, Rohitas Pathak, Sushil Tiwari and others were charged under Crime No. 920 of 2019 by the State of Maharashtra. They filed criminal writ petitions (Nos. 3815, 3816, 3817 of 2023 and ST 5546 of 2026) seeking quash of the FIR, contending that the matter had been settled …

JAFAR DILAWAR SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Jafar Dilawar Shaikh, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh application before the trial court. The court considered the submissions and allowed the withdrawal of …

SANSKAR ABASO PATOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sanskar Abaso Patole applied for regular bail in a murder case (Crime No. 690 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 238 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that Patole and a co‑accused conspired to murder the deceased, who was Patole's father, while the defence argues …

VITTHAL KISAN GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. They had joined duties between 1993 and 2000 and had been working in plain areas. The Zilla Parishad produced a ready reference chart marked 'X' showing their service details. On comparing it with the chart at page 82, the Court …

RAJSHEKHAR RAMJI KUMBHARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. TEHSILDAR BORIVALI

Allowed

The applicant, Rajshekhar Ramji Kumbhar, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his appeal after the High Court had dismissed the appeal by order dated 26 March 2026. The applicant argued that sufficient cause existed for restoration and noted that there was no opposition from the …

LALITA PRABHAKAR SANGAWAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a civil suit seeking specific performance of a sale deed and an interim injunction concerning a disputed immovable property. During the suit, the police prompted an Executive Magistrate to act under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, leading to a criminal revision …

SHRAVAN @ AARAN JANARDAN CHAVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Shravan @ Aavan Janardan Chavan, filed a criminal application seeking a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai, to expedite the hearing of his appeal against an Externment Order dated 7 January 2026, which barred him from Greater Mumbai for 18 months. The …

NITIN BALARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Nitin Balaram Patil filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra contended that only the investigating officer's evidence remained. The applicant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail …

SNEHALI SACHIN PANCHALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Snehali Sachin Panchal, filed an application before the High Court seeking bail. The applicant's counsel subsequently requested leave to withdraw the application. The Court entertained the request and directed that if the applicant appears before the Special Judge, any bail …

RAJA RAM MUKHERJEEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 251 of 2012 and the related chargesheet for an alleged offence under IPC Section 354. Both parties admitted that the dispute arose from a …

VINOD JUTHALAL VISARIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Vinod Juthalal Visaria applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under FIR No. 88 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The complaint stemmed from a disputed flat sale where the respondent alleged the applicant failed to clear a loan …

ASHOK J. ARORA AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicants, Ashok J. Arora and others, had filed First Appeal No.1543 of 2019 against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appeal was dismissed by the High Court for non‑prosecution, i.e., failure to pursue the proceedings. The appellants filed Interim Application No.9610 of 2025 …

JIGNESH ASHOKBHAI LUMBHANI ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR 408 of 2021 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and 34. The FIR arose from a matrimonial …

NASIR SALAM SAUDAGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Nasir Salam Saudagar, filed an interim application seeking an extension of a prior order dated 30‑04‑2025 that permitted him to submit a spare copy of his application to the court registry for the purpose of issuing a fresh notice to Respondent No.2. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. …

SAYYED AAKIF SAYYAD ZAFARUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sayyed Aakif Sayyad Zafaruddin, filed an interim bail application under Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release pending the hearing of his appeal against a life‑sentence conviction for offences under the UAPA, MCOC Act and IPC. The trial court had …

MOHAMMED SADIQUE QURESHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mohammed Sadique Qureshi, filed an interim application seeking continuation of an interim order granting anticipatory bail, originally dated 21 May 2025 and repeatedly extended up to 9 April 2026. He alleged a procedural lapse when the matter was not listed on the board on 9 April but …

SHRIDHAR APPARAO BABBARversusJAISINGH BHAUSAHEB SONAVANE

Dismissed

The appellant failed to appear before the High Court of Bombay on the scheduled date of 30 April 2026. Earlier, on 12 March 2026, the Court had warned that if the appellant did not appear on the next date, the appeal would be dismissed. On the appointed date, no representative of the appellant was …

MURLIDHAR GOPINATH BHORversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2019 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra, but neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared before the court for any hearing. The State's counsel also indicated that no copies of the petition were supplied to the State Government. The matter …

POOJA PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Pooja Motilal Pandey, challenged an order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had allowed a criminal revision filed by respondents Nos.2 and 3 and quashed the process issued against them for offences under Sections 499 and 500 of the IPC. The petitioner argued that the Sessions …

ROHIT SHIVAJI JADHAV AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioners challenged the FIR (CR No. 88 of 2011) filed by Rohit Jadhav and the Indapur Winery Society alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust over a wine supply agreement with Champagne Indage Ltd. The petitioners argued that the FIR lacked specific particulars, did not disclose any …

SUNIL KUMAR RAMSUCHIT BHARTIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sunil Kumar Ramsuchit Bharti, filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed disinclination to grant bail at that stage. Consequently, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to …

SAMIN ILIYAS ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The appellants, Samin Iliyas Ansari and Sonu Boloram Muramu, were convicted in a POCSO case for the rape of an 11‑year‑old mentally challenged girl. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the victim’s testimony, the absence of a proper test identification parade, and the lack of …

SNEHAL GULAB GHULEversusABHIJEET TULSHIRAM KADAM AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

Snehal Gulab Ghule filed an appeal against an order dated 2025 and also moved an interim application. The appellant later filed a praecipe on 29 April 2026 indicating withdrawal of the appeal. The Court noted that the consent terms had been filed and the original suit had been disposed by the trial …

PRAVIN JOSEPH PATHE AND ANR.versusM/S. KOTHARI ASSOCIATES AND ORS.

Dismissed

The appellant, Pravin Joseph Pathe & Anr., filed a criminal appeal challenging an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. A fresh notice was issued in March 2026, but when police attempted service, the appellants could not be found at the address. No party appeared …

SUKRI CHANGU BHASMAversusMAHADU DAMA VARGADA (DECEASED)

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed an interim application to bring on record the legal heirs of Respondent No.1, who died during the pendency of the writ petition. The application was unopposed by the counsel appearing for the deceased respondent. The court allowed the application, permitting the legal heirs to …

SANJAY MANYA DONGARKARversusGOKHALE EDUCATION SOCIETY

Allowed

The petitioner, employed as a watchman since 2003, was terminated in 2018 after a long period of continuous service. He challenged the termination, alleging it was arbitrary, constituted an unfair labour practice, and that the employer failed to prove any legal basis such as age limits or vacancy …

MAHENDRA SHRIDHAR HIRLEKARversusSHAMSUDDIN A. KAZI AND ORS.

Dismissed

The High Court of Bombay heard multiple first appeals (Nos. 323, 324, 325 of 2010) filed by various appellants against Shamsuddin A. Kazi and others. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled dates of 17 December 2025 and 13 March 2026. The court, noting the continued non‑appearance, listed the …

HIROO ADVANIversusDAVID VEDNAYAGAM RAJA

Dismissed

The petitioner, a former director of M/s Usha Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the legality of a 2022 order of the Industrial Court that dismissed his revision application against a criminal complaint alleging breach of a 2004 labour court order. The criminal complaint was filed in 2005 for …

HIROO ADVANI ,versusWAMAN SHIVRAM KENI

Dismissed

The petitioner, a former director of M/s Usha Offset Printers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the legality of a 2022 order of the Industrial Court that dismissed his revision application against a criminal complaint alleging breach of a 2004 labour court order. The criminal complaint was filed in 2005 for …

SURESH KACHRU KURLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Suresh Kachru Kurle, filed a criminal writ petition challenging FIR No. 101 of 2017 registered at Mahatma Phule Police Station, Kalyan, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties consented to settle the matter out of court and submitted …

PRITHVI VALLABH BHALCHANDRA RAWAT AND ANRversusSMT. MANJU S. AGARWAL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Prithvivallabh B. Rawat and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM). The respondents, including Manju Santosh Agarwal, contended that the underlying civil suit had been dismissed on 23 …

SONU BOLORAM MURAMUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The appellants, Samin Iliyas Ansari and Sonu Boloram Muramu, were convicted in a POCSO case for the rape of an 11‑year‑old mentally challenged girl. On appeal, the High Court examined the reliability of the victim’s testimony, the absence of a proper test identification parade, and the lack of …

AKASH DILIP UTTEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant Akash Dilip Uttekar was convicted for murder (IPC §302) and causing hurt (IPC §324) after a violent incident in which he allegedly used a scissor to stab the deceased Sameer, resulting in death. The trial court relied mainly on the testimony of four eye‑witnesses, especially PW‑5 …

SHANKAR SHRIPATI GAIKWADversusINDIRA KESHAV SHIVGAN AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Shankar Shripati Gaikwak, sought leave to withdraw his criminal appeal pending before the Bombay High Court and to re‑file it before the Sessions Court, relying on a precedent of the Supreme Court. The respondent State, represented by Ms. Kranti T. Hiwrale, opposed the withdrawal. The …

ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY AND ANRversusRAJBALA CHOUDHARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) had stayed further proceedings in a debt recovery case because a moratorium under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) was in force due to a pending petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The petitioners – a secured creditor and …

SIDDHESHWAR VISHNU MARALEversusANANTRAO PAWAR PRATHAMIK VIDYALAYA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Court noted that Respondent No. 2 had complied with the order dated 30 April 2026. Accordingly, the writ petition was deemed disposed and listed for reporting compliance. No further orders were required. The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the amount deposited in the Registry. The judgment …

AKASH DILIP UTTEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant Akash Dilip Uttekar was convicted for murder (IPC §302) and causing hurt (IPC §324) after a violent incident in which he allegedly used a scissor to stab the deceased Sameer, resulting in death. The trial court relied mainly on the testimony of four eye‑witnesses, especially PW‑5 …

haroon hamza rashidversusthe state of maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant, a military officer, sought discharge from charges of sexual assault under IPC sections 376 and 354-A, arguing that the complaint was filed three years after the alleged incident and that he was posted elsewhere at the time. The prosecution presented WhatsApp chats indicating a …

MOHAMMAD AFTAB S/O DILSHADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Mohammad Aftab applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged insurance fraud amounting to Rs.33,39,418, charged under Sections 318(4), 319,3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. The prosecution alleged that Aftab, together with co‑accused, …

ATIQUE AHMED MOHAMMAD YAKUBversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered the bail application of Atique Ahmed Mohammad Yakub, accused No.14 in FIR No.40 of 2025, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The applicant, arrested on 22 February 2025 and detained for over a year …

RAMESH D AJMERAversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BSFB NEW DELHI

Disposed Off

Ramesh D. Ajmera filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief from an order dated 20 November 2025 that had affected his Criminal Revision Application No.199 of 2016 against the Central Bureau of Investigation. The applicant contended that the order should be recalled and …

RAMESH BUILDERS THR RAMESH NANJI THAKKAR PARTNER AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF RAMESH BUILDERversusDHARMENDRA LABHSHANKAR VORA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS.1.1 BHADRA DHAMENDRA VORA AND ORS.(Deceased)

Allowed

The applicant, Ramesh Builders, filed an appeal 14 days beyond the prescribed period and moved an interim application seeking condonation of the delay. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court examined the short duration of the delay and, finding no prejudice, decided to condone it. …

SHYAM SHANTARAM THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shyam Shantaram Thorat, who was charged under Sections 64, 74, 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 6, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly sexually assaulting a 17‑year‑old girl …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusSUSHEELA JANAKRAO TAMADA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pune, challenging the inclusion of a Rs.17 lakh ex gratia amount and the use of the deceased's last drawn salary rather than the average income of the preceding three years. The Court held that, …

RANJAN KUMAR SAHUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ranjan Kumar Sahu, filed a criminal bail application before the High Court. Subsequently, his counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh application before the trial court. The learned counsel submitted that withdrawal was necessary for procedural …

GANESH SHIVAJI KALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Ganesh Shivaji Kale, was charged with harboring co‑accused who had committed dacoity and assault with intent to kill, under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and MCOCA. He had been in custody for over a year, was not present at the time of the offence, …

ABASO SHIVDAS BANDGARversusRAVINDRA SHIVDAS BANDGAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petition challenged a civil judge’s order dismissing an application to file a counter‑claim in a 2014 partition suit. The petitioner sought to bring additional joint family properties into the common hotchpot by filing the counter‑claim after the plaintiff’s affidavit and commencement of …

YOGESH KAILAS JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Yogesh Kailas Jadhav, sought bail and suspension of his life sentence under Section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pending appeal against a conviction for murder and related offences. The trial court had found him guilty of IPC sections 302, 323, 498A, 504 and …

M/S KOYNA POWER LIMITEDversusSUNIL BHIKAJI KANADE

Disposed Off

M/s. Koyna Power Ltd appealed Order No. 406 of 2026 dated 04.03.2026. By consent, the High Court set aside that order and directed that Notice of Motion No. 1903 of 2021 be heard and finally decided within six weeks of the parties' appearance before the Trial Court. The parties agreed to appear …

SNEHA S. TAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sneha S. Tawade filed a criminal application challenging an order passed by a Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The challenge arose from a notice issued to her under Section 353A of the same Act. Respondent No.2, the Bombay Municipal …

USHA S. PRABHUDESAIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the Court that it intended to withdraw the …

SOMNATH B. GAONKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the court that it intended to withdraw the …

SANDEEP H. RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the Court that it intended to withdraw the …

MILIND D. PARABversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the Court that it intended to withdraw the …

BHARTI S. PIMPALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the Court that it intended to withdraw the …

MUKUL B. SAPTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the Court that it intended to withdraw the …

DURGESH @ DURVESH PAPPU SANTOSH JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Durgesh @ Durvesh Pappu Santosh Jadhav, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh application before the trial court. The respondent State, …

KAMAL KEDU KHARE AND ANRversusNARAYANRAO GANPATRAO VINCHURKAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Kamal Kedu Khare and another, alleged that they were not present before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) and that their signatures on consent terms were forged, yet the MRT issued an order on 6 February 2024. They challenged this order through a writ petition in the Bombay …

VINODKUMAR KEHARISINHA BANJARAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Vinodkumar Banjara, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, with an acquittal on the charge under Section 504 IPC. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, the brick‑kiln owner (PW‑1) and …

Shweta Pravin ParmarversusPune Metropolitan Region Development Authority

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shweta Pravin Parmar, filed a contempt petition (No. 265 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay, which was at the pre‑notice stage. The petitioner’s counsel moved on 27 April 2026 to withdraw the petition, stating that the grievance had been redressed. The respondents, represented by …

AZIM HUSEN MANIYARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Azim Husen Maniyar, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1084 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b) and 20(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act, 1985. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Arbaz Pathan, requested …

KIMAYA WELLNESS LTDversusShree Siddhivinayak Developers

Disposed Off

Kimaya Wellness Ltd filed an interim application seeking to withdraw Rs.15,00,000 deposited before the High Court of Bombay in pending criminal revision matters. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, insisting that the applicant provide an undertaking to redeposit the amount if required. After …

KIMAYA WELLNESS LTDversusShree Siddhivinayak Developers

Disposed Off

Kimaya Wellness Ltd filed an interim application seeking to withdraw Rs.15,00,000 deposited before the High Court of Bombay. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, insisting that the applicant provide an undertaking to redeposit the amount if required. The court heard arguments from both sides and …

KIMAYA WELLNESS LTDversusSHREE SIDDHIVINAYAK DEVELOPERS

Disposed Off

Kimaya Wellness Ltd filed an interim application seeking to withdraw Rs.15,00,000 deposited before the High Court of Bombay in pending criminal revision matters. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, insisting that the applicant provide an undertaking to redeposit the amount if required. After …

SAGAR BABA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sagar Baba Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in FIR No. 68 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 316(2) and 318(4). The applicant contended that the complaint stemmed from a commercial …

IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHRI.SANTOSH KUMAR SIPAHILAL GUPTA AND ANR.

Dismissed for non-complying conditional Order

The appellant, Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal but failed to provide the required spare copies of the appeal documents to the court. Consequently, the court could not issue notice to the respondents, Shri Santosh Kumar Sipahilal Gupta and another. The judge directed the …

THE SHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusS.G. MISTRY

Dismissed

The High Court considered four writ petitions challenging a trial court's refusal to dismiss a suit under Order XI Rule 21 of the CPC on the ground of alleged non‑inspection of documents. The petitioner argued that the plaintiff had failed to produce certain documents referenced in the plaint and …

YOGESH SURESH JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Yogesh Suresh Jadhav, an advocate, was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for preparing false and forged documents to provide surety and impersonating the original surety before the trial court. He applied for regular bail, arguing that co‑accused advocates with …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusMR GANPAT HARIBHAU JADHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 326 of 2016) against Ganpat Haribhau Jadhav & Ors. The appellant sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted the leave, ordered that the statutory deposit of Rs.25,000 be transferred to the concerned Motor …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusMR GANPAT HARIBHAU JADHAV AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 326 of 2016) against Ganpat Haribhau Jadhav & Ors. The appellant sought leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted the leave, ordered that the statutory deposit of Rs.25,000 be transferred to the concerned Motor …

VANDANA SHAHversusSANJEEV DOSHI

Disposed Off

The applicants, Vandana Shah and another, filed a criminal revision application challenging an order dated 26 February 2021. They later sought leave to withdraw that revision application and requested liberty to file an appeal against the same order. The respondent, Sanjeev Doshi and others, were …

ANANDA ABAJI SHELARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Ananda Abaji Shelar filed a criminal revision application challenging an order of acquittal. The applicant failed to appear despite service of notice, and fresh notices were issued on 13.01.2026. Several respondents, including accused and villagers, were reported dead, with death certificates …

YATIN PANDHARINATH VEKHANDEversusPRANALI YATIN VEKHANDE

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Yatin Pandharinath Vekhande, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. On instructions, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was disposed of …

TARANNUM BEGUMversusISMAIL ABDULLAH SHAIKH

Disposed Off

The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 14 October 2020, seeking to restrain the respondent from dispossessing her of Flat No. 306. The respondent contended that the agreement was forged and that he could not have signed it because he was hospitalized for …

SOHAIL RAIMANversusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA)

Disposed Off

The appellants, owners of 24 flats in the Universal Garden building, challenged a notice issued by MMRDA under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 alleging unauthorized enclosure of balconies. They sought interim relief to prevent removal of the structures, claiming …

MOHAMMED PARVEZversusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA)

Disposed Off

The appellants, owners of 24 flats in the Universal Garden building, challenged a notice issued by MMRDA under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 alleging unauthorized enclosure of balconies. They sought interim relief to prevent removal of the structures, claiming …

JAYSHREE M. LIKHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants challenged an order issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which was based on a notice issued under Section 353A of the same Act. The Corporation (Respondent No.2) informed the court that it intended to withdraw the …

DYANESHWAR S. KELAJIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners (Dyaneshwar S. Kelaji, Dinesh P. Maru and Vaishali A. Dabholkar) filed applications challenging an order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The order arose from a notice issued to them under Section 353A of the same …

DINESH P. MARUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners (Dyaneshwar S. Kelaji, Dinesh P. Maru and Vaishali A. Dabholkar) filed applications challenging an order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 471 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The order arose from a notice issued to them under Section 353A of the same …

MR. RAJIYA TAHIR KURESHI AND ORSversusSHRI SANJAY APPASAHEB SWAMI AND ORS

Dismissed

The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 536‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order dated 2 March 2012. They claimed the delay was due to awaiting receipt of the awarded sum and attending to the ailing health of respondent No.4, which …

Pradeep Ramchandra ShindeversusSujata Saunik

Disposed Off

Petitioners Kailas Bhima Gunjal & Anr. and Pradeep Ramchandra Shinde & Anr. filed contempt petitions alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to issue reasoned orders on their eligibility for National/State teaching awards. The respondents, senior officials of the Rural Development …

CHOLAMANDLAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petition was filed by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented in the High Court of Bombay under the criminal writ jurisdiction. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing. The Court …

ADITYA SHARAD SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aditya Sharad Shinde, sought regular bail in a case (Crime No. 19 of 2025) where he was charged under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that he was present near the co‑accused auto‑rickshaw driver who transported the dead body of …

RITESH VILAS MARUversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, R. V. Maru, had been granted bail on 1 July 2025 on condition of furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one or more solvent sureties. By April 2026, the applicant was unable to provide the surety for about eight months and sought a reduction of the surety amount. The State …

JAMIL AHMED ANSARI @ SAMEERversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Jamil Ahmed Ansari, sought modification of the bail conditions imposed on 17 July 2025, specifically requesting a reduction in the surety amount from Rs. 25,000 to a lower figure due to his inability to furnish the original surety for about eight months. The respondent State and the …

SACHIN GOVIND WALKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sachin Govind Walke, filed an interim application seeking relaxation of bail condition No. 8(iv) imposed by the Bombay High Court on 2 September 2024, which required him to report to a police station on the 1st and 16th of each month between 10 a.m. and 12 noon. The applicant's …

SHAFI IBRAHIM MEMONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The prosecution alleged that the applicant, Shafi Ibrahim Memon, supplied 50 grams of mephedrone to a co-accused who was later found in possession of the drug. The co-accused (Accused No.1) had been acquitted by the Trial Court and no record was produced showing any transaction between the applicant …

KUNAL LAXMAN PETHEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Kunal Laxman Pethekar, was charged under Sections 64, 75, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman over the age of 16 on two occasions in September and …

SHANKAR MUKESH KAMBALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Shankar Mukesh Kambale applied for regular bail in a case (Crime No. 367 of 2025) alleging assault with a sharp weapon and intent to kill, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013. The prosecution presented CCTV footage …

Anuraag AgarwalversusState of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

Anuraag Agarwal filed Writ Petition No. 1531 of 2025 and Contempt Petition No. 663 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court. The Court had earlier disposed Writ Petition No. 3224 of 2026 by an order dated 16 July 2026. The petitioner subsequently moved a Praecipe on 17 July 2026 seeking modification of …

M/S. V. V. ENTERPRISES AND OTHERSversusSHREE MANDAR CO-OP.HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

Disposed Off

The appellants, M/s. V. V. Enterprises and Ors, filed an appeal from Order No.392 of 2026 challenging a procedural order in Regular Civil Appeal No.25 of 2025 pending before the District Judge, Kalyan. They sought a time‑bound disposal of the appeal from order without any adjudication on the merits, …

SHRI.NIRMALKUMAR CHIRANJILAL JAGOTAversusSHRI.CHANDRAKANT GOVIND BHIDE

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Nirmalkumar Chiranjee Lal Jagota, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, an office note revealed that the petitioner had died. No legal heirs or representatives appeared before the Court to continue the petition. The Court considered whether the …

HIRAMAN MAHADU MALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Hiraman Mahadu Mali, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 49‑day delay in filing an appeal against his conviction. The application was presented through Ms. Manisha Devkar, appointed by the Legal Aid Committee, on behalf of Mr. Shankar Katkar. The State of Maharashtra …

Shardul PujariversusRevati Pujari

Disposed Off

The father (Petitioner) filed an interim application seeking a temporary order allowing his daughter, Mihika, to travel to the United States for a ceremony, with a condition that she return to India by a specified date. The mother (Respondent) opposed, alleging that the father had previously taken …

NEW LOTUS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The New Lotus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. filed writ petitions challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. In the court's order dated 23/04/2026, two clerical errors were identified: the abbreviation ‘PMC’ was mistakenly typed as ‘BMC’, and the filing date of Writ Petition No. …

BABU ALIAS DHONDU LAXMAN PADWALversusSHANKAR GENU PADWAL AND ORS.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The appellant, Swapnil Babu alias Dhondu Laxman Padwal, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on multiple scheduled dates for his second appeal against Shankar Genu Padwal and others. The court had previously adjourned the appeal on at least four occasions due to the appellant's …

ASSOCIATION OF THE MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDED PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES (MAHARASHTRA) AND ORSversusHIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPT. THR ITS PRIN. SECRETARY , THE STATE OF MAH. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, associations of management of various unaided colleges in Maharashtra, filed multiple writ petitions seeking direction for the State to pay pending scholarship, freeship and reimbursement fees to their institutions. The Court held that these writ petitions should be treated as …

KIRAN CHANDRAKANT KULKARNIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Kiran Chandrakant Kulkarni, filed Criminal Application No. 168 of 2013 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The application was presented without any supporting documents or evidence. The court examined …

MADHAVI SACHIN SIRSATversusTHE STATE MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Madhavi Sachin Sirsat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …

NITENDRASINGH KUMARSING PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 20 April 2018, the petitioner or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the …

MOHAMMED ISHTIAQUE EBRAHIM BAGBANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Mohammed Ishtiaque Ebrahi Bagban, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after November 25, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …

KAPADIA DEVELOPMENT CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners, Kapadia Development Co‑op. Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition on 29 January 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The Court observed that the petitioners appeared …

MR.RAJENDRAKUMAR KALICHARAN VERMAversusMR.MANGILAL BHIMRAMJI CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Mr. Rajendrakumar Kalicharan Verma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record shows that after 28 January 2016 the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the …

KETAN CHUGHversusHEMANT NAGRALE AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Ketan Chugh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …

TAJPAL DUNGARJI PATIDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Tajpal Dungarji Patidar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The record shows that after July 6, 2017, the petitioner or his counsel made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …

JAIKUMAR LAXMANDAS JHULAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Jaikumar Laxmandas Jhula, filed a writ petition on 31 January 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No further steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, including any circulation of the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested …

PURAN KARANSINGH DAS THROUGH DINESH KARANSINGH DASversusSENIOR INSPECTOR AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Puran Karansingh Das, filed Writ Petition No. 608 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 26 April 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …

HAMID GANI SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Hamid Gani Shah, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for further investigation into a crime for which a charge-sheet had been filed in 2019. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, submitted that the investigation was complete. The High Court examined …

DHAMMPAL KADUBA DANDGEversusISHWAR KISHANLAL AGRWAL AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Dhammpal Kaduba Dandge, filed a writ petition on 9 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. Despite the filing, the petitioner failed to appear for the scheduled hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel had …

SANTOSH SITARAM GAIKWAD AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 554 of 2018) and a related criminal application (No. 62 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court. After February 22, 2018, the petitioners and their counsel failed to take any steps to circulate the petition or appear before the court. The court observed that …

SHOEB M. ZUBER ANSARI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 16 February 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No petitioner appeared when called for hearing, and the record shows that the petitioners or their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition at any time. The court observed that the petitioners appeared …

MADHAVI SACHIN SIRSATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Madhavi Sachin Sirsat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …

MANJULA TOKERBHAI SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2018 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …

MANOHAR DHONDU KARNUKversusSENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE and ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Manohar Dhondu Karnuk, filed a writ petition on 24 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026. The court noted that since filing, neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to circulate or pursue …

Shweta Kishore DaniversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant, Shweta Kishore Dani, filed a criminal application seeking relief. Counsel for the applicant, Ms Srushti Dube, requested leave of the court to withdraw the application. The court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as …

PIYUSH TRIPATHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Piyush Tripathi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …

DENIS C. LOBOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Denis C. Lobo, filed Writ Petition No. 976 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after …