The petitioner filed a writ petition on 27 February 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Ramling S/o Narsappa Deshmane, filed Writ Petition No.1104 of 2018 before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through Advocate Abdullah Shaikh, sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court considered the request and, after hearing, granted leave to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Nitin Ravindranath Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Bhiwandi City Police Station and others. The court noted that after 12 February 2018 the petitioner or his counsel made no effort to circulate the petition or appear for hearing. The record …
Rekha Dnyaneshwar Kunte filed a writ petition on 23 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 25 January 2018 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for any hearing after filing. The court noted that the petitioners made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition. It was …
The Karbhari Anna Charitable Foundation, operating a primary school, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement from the State of Maharashtra. The State, through the Principal Secretary of Education, submitted that it had received recommendations from the Zilla Parishad, Pune, and forwarded the …
The petitioner, Dwarkanath Namdev Patil, filed a writ petition on 9 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No further action was taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, including failure to circulate it for hearing. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in …
The petitioner, Abdul Nayeem Kayyum Khan, filed a writ petition on 16 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared for the petitioner at the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026, and the court record shows that neither the petitioner nor his …
Satish Ramchandra Sangar filed a writ petition (No.12762 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioner submitted a praecipe requesting the court's permission to withdraw on written instructions. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, …
The applicant, Israil Mohd. Ali Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Rahul Raj (in the name of R. Sathyanarayanan), sought relief pending a trial before the Sessions Judge, 27th Court, Mumbai. The court noted that there was no …
This is a criminal writ petition filed by Sunanda Suresh Patil against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was filed on 26th March 2018. When the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. The record showed that since the date of filing, the petitioner and/or …
The petitioner, Mohammed Sharif Abdulla Shaikh, filed a writ petition on 26 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petition was scheduled for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate or pursue the petition …
The petitioner, Usman Gani Hussain Rathod, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The applicant, Ganesh Baban Gite, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging forgery and fraud in land subdivision to evade the statutory requirement of reserving 20% of large residential projects for EWS/LIG housing under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that fabricated …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 April 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, long‑serving employees, applied for pension under the Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995 on the basis of the joint option for higher wages. EPFO rejected their applications, citing the employer’s failure to produce required documents such as Form 6A and challans. The petitioners argued …
The appellants sought to delete a deceased appellant from the first appeal and substitute his heirs, while the respondents filed a civil application to delete a deceased respondent and implead his heirs. Both applications were filed after considerable delay, prompting the court to consider …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After filing, the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and submitted an undated statement signed by an advocate. The court recorded the statement and, on the …
The petitioners, Laxmi Mandhawani and others, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code before the trial court. The High Court examined whether such withdrawal with the said liberty could …
The appellants, the family of an engineer who died in a road accident on 6 December 2009, appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs 39,70,000. The Tribunal had calculated compensation based on the deceased’s monthly salary of Rs 33,000, deducted one‑third for personal …
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Deepak Dada Khatal on 17 April 2018 because the petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and made no effort to pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel did not circulate the petition even once, …
M/s. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 27 January 2025, did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Taraben Navinbhai Barot, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after September 24, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
A writ petition was filed by C. S. Ravi Narayan. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 October 2018. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 5 May 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
The petitioner, Sudhir Popatlal Kotak, filed a writ petition after the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. He sought leave to withdraw the petition and instead file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code for further investigation. The Court granted the leave, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner and her counsel failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 28 May 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 28 May 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when the matter was called for hearing. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition since its filing. It was observed …
The petitioner, Sachin Babarao Kale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The parties subsequently settled the dispute amicably. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. The petition was consequently withdrawn and the matter disposed of. No …
The petitioner, Bhairulal Hiralalji Chowdhari, filed a writ petition on 5 June 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.86,000 to the claimant, a vegetable vendor who was injured in a 2005 road accident while transporting his own goods. The insurer argued that the claimant was a gratuitous passenger and thus ineligible …
A writ petition was filed on 12 April 2018 by Chandrakant Baban Bidkar seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to advance the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Sagar Maruti Suryawanshi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
Amit Rajkumar Singhania filed Writ Petition No.2540 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court against the Union of India. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and, after 19 July 2017, took no steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions (Nos. 2726 of 2018 and 2429 of 2018) because the petitioner, Umesh Motwani, failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petitions after March 2019. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the …
Petitioner Asiya Begam filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. During proceedings, her counsel stated on 16 June 2022 that she had no objection to the appointment of Mr. Gharat as Special Public Prosecutor to conduct her case. The Court held that this unequivocal statement …
The petitioner, Mohd. Siddhiq Haji, failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 23, 2019, made no effort to circulate the writ petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the judges considered whether the petition could continue …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief against the respondents. The court examined the case status of the underlying suit and found that it had been disposed on 3 May 2018. Since the suit was already concluded, the writ petitions were deemed infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and, since October 2018, made no effort to circulate the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented …
The petitioners filed an interim application seeking amendment of Arbitration Appeal No. 53 of 2023, which was still at the pre‑admission stage. The respondents opposed the amendment, filing a detailed affidavit. The court examined the application and noted that the appeal had not yet been admitted. …
The petitioner, Shivpratap Ramnivas Maurya, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The matter of Vinod Chandrakant Pitale & Anr. v. Tanaji Shivram Kothawale & Ors. was before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The Court, presided over by Justice Farhan P. Dubash, dealt with procedural aspects of the appeal. An order dated 18 April 2026 had earlier fixed a deadline for …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking relief against an order affecting its claim. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Himanshu Takke, submitted that the insurance company had already deposited the decree amount with the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The court accepted this …
The petitioner, Gulfam Ahmed Samani, filed a writ petition on 6 July 2018 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the scheduled hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court noted that the …
HCL Services Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 22 September 2016 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petitioner's cause of action still existed. It concluded that the cause of action had ceased to exist, rendering the petition …
The petitioner, Idris Abdul Hamid Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after December 3, 2018, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Ganesh Laxman Lagas, filed a writ petition on 17 July 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner did not take any steps to circulate the petition after …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ramesh Bhalerao, filed a writ petition on 20 July 2018 challenging the actions of the Director of Higher Education and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps …
Ganesh Investments & Financial Technics Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The Court examined whether the cause of action still existed. It held that the passage of time had extinguished the …
The petitioner, Ganesh Investments & Financial Technics Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time since the alleged cause of action arose. The Court examined whether the petition remained maintainable …
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Ankit Nitin Palekar after the petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not circulate the petition after February 10, 2021. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition …
The petitioner, Sachin Sopanrao Vede, filed Writ Petition No. 3199 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Investigation Officer and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after March 7, 2018. …
The petitioners, Laxmi Mandhawani and others, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code before the trial court. The High Court examined whether such withdrawal with the said liberty could …
M/s. Fiabrecom Industries Limited, represented by its proprietor Bilal Husain Namrah, filed a writ petition (No. 3291 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed on 14 August 2017, but the court observed that neither the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 August 2017. Since filing, the petitioner and her counsel failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. On this basis, the court …
Petitioner Laxman Madhavdas Harwani filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 3 December 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Bapu Prabhakar Nair, filed a writ petition on 18 August 2017 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner Diwakar Sinha filed a writ petition on 18 August 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026. The court noted that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue the …
The petitioner, Ravindra Chandrakant Chiplunkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 24 August 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioners, Swapnil Ajay Madhukar Chaudhari and an associate, filed Writ Petition No. 10604 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court against respondent Pritam Ramchandra Pawar. The petition was heard before Justice Gauri Godse. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the underlying suit had already …
The petitioner, Rachna Puri, filed a writ petition challenging an investigation. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the police had already filed a closure report in the case. The Court held that the filing of the closure report rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the …
Nagina Hasan filed Writ Petition No. 3438 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 October 2018. The court …
Mahesh Chandrakant Zagade filed a writ petition on 12 August 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No petitioner or his counsel appeared when called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court inferred that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to take any steps to circulate the petition after November 1, 2017. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the judges concluded that the petition was effectively …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 September 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner’s apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioner, Ananda Baban Sable, filed a writ petition on 15 September 2017. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, and the petitioner did not appear for hearing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Rohit Phadtare, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after July 4, 2018, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case. The respondents, represented by Smt. P. P. Shinde, highlighted this inactivity. The Court examined …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 18, 2015. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Umesh Kailesh Athani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court record shows that after 8 November 2017, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Manish Hansraj Jain, filed a writ petition on 29 September 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner did not take any steps to circulate the petition …
The petitioners, Edit Guru, filed a writ petition (No. 4081 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court noted that after 14 November 2017, the petitioner and its counsel made no effort to circulate the petition even once. It was …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 6, 2017. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the …
M/s Jay Gurudev Realty filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 6 December 2018. The court noted that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 25 September 2017 but failed to take any steps to circulate or pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioners and their counsel did not appear for hearing and appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. On this basis, the court …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra, but their counsel reported that no further instructions were received. The court noted that after 26 November 2018, neither the petitioners nor their advocate took any steps to advance the petitions. It appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 October 2017 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed by Zehaan Subhasish Das, who was charged under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for alleged non‑consensual sexual intercourse, forcible recording and …
The petitioner, Sundarabai Govardhan Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after February 13, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Majula Baban Jadhav filed a writ petition on 13 November 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared …
The applicants, Avinash Kadam, Amit Vishwakarma and Sahil Kadam, sought bail in connection with CR No. 837 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. They invoked the principle of parity, relying on an …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after August 7, 2018, the petitioner or her counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioners, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its officials, challenged an Industrial Court order that had upheld the suspension of employee Suresh Kadam and treated the suspension period as leave, alleging that the suspension and subsequent fine of Rs.5,000 were illegal and …
The petitioners, cooperative housing societies, challenged orders granting deemed conveyance of land and common areas by the District Deputy Registrar under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. They argued that conveyance should be deferred until the entire multi‑phase project was completed or …
The petitioner-wife filed a writ petition challenging the Family Court's order rejecting her application to amend a counterclaim in a divorce proceeding on the ground that the amendment was sought after the issues were framed. The High Court examined the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Mahila …
The petitioner, Pooja Swapnil Sonawane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a divorce from her husband, Swapnil Sandeep Sonawane. The High Court, after hearing counsel, directed the Family Court to allow the petitioner-wife to file a written statement on the next date. It also …
The petitioner, Chandrashekhare Kaluram Sawant, challenged a Small Causes Court order dated 8 September 2025 that rejected his application to extend the time for depositing interim compensation, a period originally fixed by a High Court order on 16 September 2016. The High Court noted that the …
The appellant, M/s Multi Modal Freight System Pvt Ltd, challenged the acquittal of Yogesh Mordani by the Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant argued that, under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, …
Rupali Sachin Kadam filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against her husband, Sachin Shankar Kadam. The petition pertained to a pending family court case (Petition No. A‑2208 of 2021) originally filed in the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. By consent, the High Court ordered …
Petitioner Baghu Budhiyabhai Halpati filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and others. The Court examined whether the cause of action for the petition still existed. It concluded that the cause of action no longer survived. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Wasim Akram Alihasan Ansari, filed a writ petition on 24 November 2017 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ramchand Chhabaria, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 July 2019. The …
The petitioner, Raosaheb Dagdu Chougule, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate R. Sathyanarayanan, later applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, comprising Justices A.S. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 384 of 2018) and a related criminal application (No. 501 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after 23 October 2018, indicating a lack of …
The respondents, legal heirs of the deceased Balu Vithu More, sued to declare ownership of a suit property, alleging that the appellant had fabricated a will to claim title. The trial court declared the respondents as owners, ordered the appellant to deliver vacant possession, and revoked the …
The High Court entertained three civil applications seeking to record the legal heirs of a deceased revision applicant and the legal representatives of a sole respondent, and allowed them, directing necessary amendments within three weeks. All three applications were subsequently disposed. In a …
The petitioner, Siddharth P. Shah, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The High Court considered three criminal bail applications filed by Ateev Vrajlal Gala and co‑accused, who were charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 34, 465, 467 and 471 for allegedly misrepresenting that flats were free of mortgage and forging a ‘no due’ certificate. The prosecution alleged that …
The petitioners, Reliance Retail Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 28 February 2017 passed by a judicial authority. The respondents, the Controller of Rationing and Director Civil Supplies, opposed the petition. The Court held …
The petitioner, Rajvindarsingh Ajeet Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 5396 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court. After 31 January 2018, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear for any further hearing and did not take steps to circulate the petition. The Court noted that the petitioner appeared …
The applicant, Mr. Mohammad Mustafa Gafor Shaikh, filed a civil revision application (No. 365 of 2016) against Mr. Ramesh Jairam Gupta and others. Conditional directions were issued on 20 February 2026, but one of the respondents was unserved and had died. The court directed that the revision …
The applicant was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act and the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Regulation for allegedly cheating investors by inducing them to invest in residential flats, forging documents, and diverting funds to a bogus …
Petitioner Sharada Vijay Sapkale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner later sought leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition due to subsequent events. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and another, opposed the withdrawal. The …
The High Court considered three criminal bail applications filed by Ateev Vrajlal Gala and co‑accused, who were charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 34, 465, 467 and 471 for allegedly misrepresenting that flats were free of mortgage and forging a ‘no due’ certificate. The prosecution alleged that …
The plaintiff filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 60‑day delay in filing a first appeal against a judgment dated 22‑Oct‑2012. The application was heard before Justice K.K. Tated. The court ordered that the application be returned after 12 weeks, allowing the plaintiff to serve the …
The appellants, originally defendants, appealed the concurrent judgments that granted an injunction to protect the plaintiffs' possession of a suit property and dismissed the appellants' counter‑claim for an injunction. The plaintiffs relied on a sale deed executed by the father of the defendants, …
The petitioner, Somnath Waman Bhoir, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later submitted a letter seeking to withdraw the petition unconditionally, stating he does not wish to file a fresh petition. The petition was before a two‑judge bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari and Justice Kamal …
The National Insurance Co. appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order awarding Rs.9,97,500 plus interest to the claimants. The insurer challenged the award on the ground that the deceased’s name was inconsistently recorded in the FIR as “Raghu Raj Shetty” versus “Raghu Raj Ganiga Mahalinga” in …
The National Insurance Co. appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order that awarded Rs.9,97,500 plus interest to the claimants. The insurer challenged the award on the ground that the deceased’s name was inconsistently recorded in the FIR as “Raghu Raj Shetty” versus “Raghu Raj Ganiga Mahalinga” …
The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …
The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …
The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …
The High Court examined multiple writ petitions filed by obstructionists (unit owners) and decree‑holders concerning the execution of a 2014 eviction decree in a lease‑dispute. The lease, though intended for 99 years, was treated as a monthly lease under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, …
The applicant, Vasant Anandrao Idhol, was arrested after 2,800 grams of ganja were seized from him based on intelligence inputs, leading to charges under several provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The applicant pleaded that he has no prior criminal record and …
The petitioner, Ravindra R. Koregaonkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
Bhaurao Shankar Khute, a peon at Bhonsla Military College, was dismissed in 2019 for absenteeism, temporary misappropriation of college funds, and alleged corruption involving parents' money. He appealed the dismissal to the University Tribunal, which upheld the penalty, finding the enquiry fair, …
Santosh Dagadu Sane filed Interim Application No. 115 of 2026 seeking additional time to amend pleadings in First Appeal No. 90 of 2023. The Court had earlier, on 10 April 2026, granted permission to amend but mistakenly cited FA No. 154 of 2024. The applicant reiterated the request for further time …
Santosh Dagadu Sane filed Interim Application No. 115 of 2026 seeking additional time to amend pleadings in First Appeal No. 90 of 2023. The Court had earlier, on 10 April 2026, granted permission to amend but mistakenly cited FA No. 154 of 2024. The applicant reiterated the request for further time …
The wife, Pallavi Ganesh Gangurde, filed a transfer application seeking to move divorce proceedings initiated by her husband before the Family Court at Nashik to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. She resides in Kandivali with her parents and a seven‑year‑old daughter, is a homemaker and receives …
The applicant, Darshan Gorakh Gaikwad, was charged under multiple sections of the IPC, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act for an alleged assault with intent to kill on 25 June 2023. He had been in custody for over two and a half years while all co‑accused had …
The applicant, Haider Paigamber Pathan, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant argued for bail, but the Court expressed disinclination to grant relief at that stage. On the Court's indication, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail …
The petitioners challenged a Civil Judge's order that the amendment of the plaint be heard before the application to reject the plaint. The High Court examined the precedents cited by both sides, particularly Pramod s/o Manoharrao Konge v. Shantaram Dhok and Bharat Travellers v. Sumitrabai Buty, …
Applicant Rhuturaj Mehta filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court. During the pendency of that application, he appeared before the trial court and was granted regular bail. The applicant's counsel argued that, in view of the regular bail, there was nothing left to be decided on …
The applicant Bhavesh Devkumar Vasu filed a bail application seeking an order to mask the victim's name in the online case status. The counsel for the original complainant, Ms. Neha Ahuja, informed the court that the victim's name had already been masked by the Registry. The court noted this …
The petitioner filed a writ petition alleging that the detainee was being held in police custody without legal authority. The Respondent, the State, through the Acting Chief Police Prosecutor, informed the Court that the detainee would be released on the same day and sought liberty to take …
The Bombay High Court was hearing Interim Application No.2658 of 2026 in Writ Petition No.823 of 2026. The application was moved by Ravindra Dudugu, described as Intervenor/Applicant. The writ petition is between Laxmi Shankar Ande and Anr. as Petitioners and Mactec Realtors and Developers Pvt. Ltd. …
Prashant Balkrishna Mohire filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant the bail. The applicant's counsel then sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged a Small Causes Court order that permitted amendment of the plaint to include a claim for Rs.1.50 crore spent on repairs and refurbishment of the suit premises. The High Court observed that the trial court had only allowed the amendment and …
The Bombay High Court examined several writ petitions challenging the eligibility criteria for the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) for promotion to Cluster Head in Maharashtra. The petitioners argued that the cut‑off date for six years of service and the Teacher Eligibility Test …
The petitioners, Polyster Realtors Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra and others. The Court heard counsel for both sides and examined the report of the City Civil Court. The matter concerned the disposal of a chamber summons. The Court …
The petitioners, employees of Zilla Parishad working in tribal and PESA areas, sought mandatory direction for the State of Maharashtra to grant them the "Eksthar" one‑step pay‑scale benefits and arrears from the date of their appointments, invoking earlier government orders dated 06‑08‑2002, …
The Bombay High Court modified orders of the Small Causes Court Appellate Bench concerning interim compensation payable by obstructionists who occupied units in a building constructed on a 99‑year lease that was not registered. The lease was treated as a monthly tenancy under Section 106 of the …
The Bombay High Court modified orders of the Small Causes Court Appellate Bench concerning interim compensation payable by obstructionists who occupied units in a building constructed on a 99‑year lease that was not registered. The lease was treated as a monthly tenancy under Section 106 of the …
The Bombay High Court modified orders of the Small Causes Court Appellate Bench concerning interim compensation payable by obstructionists who occupied units in a building constructed on a 99‑year lease that was not registered. The lease was treated as a monthly tenancy under Section 106 of the …
The petitioner, Jitesh Dudhale, challenged an order dated 11 March 2026 of the Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. He had filed an appeal before the Appellate Senior Citizen Tribunal on 29 March 2026, but the Tribunal refused to register …
The appellant, Noor Mohammed Ibrahim Tambe, filed an appeal against an order dated 2026. During the proceedings, the parties reconciled their dispute and executed a five‑page Minutes of Order, which was filed and marked for identification. The court accepted the Minutes of Order as binding …
The petitioners filed a review petition challenging the High Court's order dated 27 March 2026 in Writ Petition No. 15677 of 2025. The Court noted that the review was filed through counsel who had not argued the original petition, a practice the Supreme Court has discouraged. The petitioners also …
The applicant, Nilesh Dipak Naik, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing eleven cheques totaling Rs.33,00,000 and was ordered to pay Rs.66,00,000 in compensation. He had deposited Rs.13,20,000 before the trial court, which was withdrawn by the respondent, and …
The applicant, Nilesh Dipak Naik, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing eleven cheques totaling Rs.33,00,000 and was ordered to pay Rs.66,00,000 in compensation. He had deposited Rs.13,20,000 before the trial court, which was withdrawn by the respondent, and …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a civil application seeking substituted service of a respondent by publishing notice in newspapers. The court examined whether such a method of service was permissible under procedural law. Finding the applicant’s request justified, the court ordered service by …
The Army Institute of Technology and other petitioners filed three writ petitions challenging actions of certain university officials, including two professors and the Chairman. Both sides agreed that the matters should be remanded for fresh proceedings before the university's Grievance Committee. …
The applicants were arrested on 19 December 2020 for possession of 34.404 kg of charas, a commercial quantity, under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii) and 29 of the NDPS Act. They have been in custody for about five years and three months without the trial commencing. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the …
Fibercon Industries Ltd. and another filed Writ Petition No.2457 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioners failed to appear. The court observed that after 14 November 2019 the petitioners or their counsel did not take any …
The petitioner, Mohammad Shafiq Abdul Majeed Qureshi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and sought unconditional leave to withdraw it. The …
The petitioner, Pankaj Bhagwat Giri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel later sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court considered the request and, without examining the merits of the petition, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, …
Punjab National Bank filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after August 8, 2017, the petitioner and its counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the …
The petitioners, Mathurabai Rajara Bhandari and an associate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear when called. The court record shows that after 25 September 2017, …
The petitioner, Tarachand R. Nashiney, filed a writ petition on 15 July 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 10 April 2026, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel made …
The petitioners, a facility management company, challenged a 2019 Industrial Court order that found them guilty of an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and directed payment of …
Multiple writ petitions were filed in the Bombay High Court by various petitioners, including Zeco Aircon Limited and individuals such as Nikhil Padte, Sujata Wathoo and Manish Gupta, against the State of Maharashtra. The complainant, Respondent No.2, informed the court that it no longer wished to …
The High Court of Bombay considered a batch of writ petitions (including WP No. 4081 of 2024 and several related petitions) after receiving an office note indicating that the date of disposal recorded in the earlier order was incorrect. The note stated that the correct disposal date should be 10 …
The applicant, Dhananjay R. Tiwari, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment until the rising of the court and a fine of Rs.20,00,000. He deposited Rs.10,00,000 of the fine and applied for suspension of the sentence and bail pending the …
The applicant, Abhichandra @ Abhiram Harishyam Podh, filed an interim application seeking modification of condition (ii) of a bail order dated 15 September 2023, which required his attendance at the concerned police station. He argued that for the past four years he has been regularly attending the …
The appellant Rajkumar Sharma appealed against two orders of the Trial Court dated 5 August 2023 and 27 September 2024 that rejected his ad‑interim reliefs. The respondents Vishrut Anand Sharma and others filed a counter suit seeking to set aside those interim orders. Both parties complained that …
The appellants, Thakur Blue Heaven Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal against Mahadev Tower Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and sought to withdraw the appeal. Counsel for the appellants informed the court of their intention to withdraw, and the court entertained the request. The …
The High Court considered the bail application of Raju Ganpat Kamble, accused of repeatedly sexually assaulting a minor between September 2024 and June 2025, offences charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The …
The applicant, Yogesh Shahaji Doiphode, sought regular bail in a case (Crime No. 401 of 2024) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Criminal Law Amendment Act, including alleged assault and attempted murder. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with …
The applicants, Vishnukumar Bansal and another, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Bombay. The underlying criminal complaint was subsequently withdrawn by the complainant. The applicants then sought leave from the Court to withdraw their application in view of the withdrawn …
The applicant, Govind Ladu Kale, was charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (including murder, attempt to murder, robbery, and criminal intimidation) and the Arms Act for allegedly breaking into a relative's bungalow, assaulting occupants, and stealing jewellery worth …
Santosh Dagadu Sane filed Interim Application No. 115 of 2026 seeking additional time to amend pleadings in First Appeal No. 90 of 2023. The Court had earlier, on 10 April 2026, granted permission to amend but mistakenly cited FA No. 154 of 2024. The applicant reiterated the request for further time …
The New India Assurance Company filed an appeal challenging an order of the Commissioner for Employee’s Compensation, Thane, but delayed filing the appeal by 147 days. The Court examined whether such delay could be condoned and whether the decretal amount already deposited justified a stay of the …
The appellant’s counsel was absent and failed to supply the required copies of the appeal record despite being granted a two‑week extension. The Registrar, invoking Chapter VII, Rule 2(iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, noted that non‑payment of process fees and failure to …
The petitioners, Hi Rock Construction Company, challenged orders of the City Civil Court, Mazgaon, which had refused to return summary suit plaints filed by the respondents alleging fraud and non‑payment of advances. The petitioners argued that the Court lacked jurisdiction because the partnership …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award granted to Kisan Gopala Deshmukh and others in a land acquisition matter (Reference No. 137 of 1995). The acquisition officer had awarded Rs. 15,679, whereas the jurisdictional District Judge had awarded Rs. 77,740. The appellant argued that the …
Shripad Appsaheb Bhosale filed a writ petition (No. 828 of 2015) against the State of Maharashtra. An earlier petition dated 4 December 2023 had been dismissed for non‑prosecution and later restored by the court. On the present date, the petitioner failed to appear before the bench and indicated a …
The applicants sought to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent in a pending civil application for condonation of delay. The respondents opposed, alleging the applicants should have known of the death. The Court examined the applicants' sworn statement that they …
The writ petition arose from a dispute between Sushilabai Raghunath Wani and Shakuntalabai over CL-III Licence No.24, which was originally held by a partnership between Raghunath and Manohar and later continued by Sushilabai and her son, with an agreement that the late Pandit Thorat (Wani) was …
Petitioner Rahul Viresh Mehta filed a writ petition challenging FIR No. 654 of 2025 registered at Waliv Police Station, Vasai. The State, through APP Mrs. Rajeshree Newton, informed the Court that the investigation was nearing completion and a chargesheet would be filed within a month. On this …
The applicant, Umesh Kondiba Avhad, sought suspension of his sentence and release on bail pending the appeal of his conviction. The record showed that co‑accused Nos.2, 3 and 4, who faced identical charges of assaulting the deceased, had already been released on bail. The respondent’s counsel …
The petitioners challenged the rejection of their interim relief application and a stay order against a disqualification order of the housing society's managing committee under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The High Court noted concerns about the procedure of the original order and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 45 of 2026 registered at Kashimira Police Station and a stay on further investigation. They later requested to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition if a chargesheet is filed and cognizance taken. The …
Neeraj Parshuram Rathod filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh bail application after six months. The Court, after hearing both sides, …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority directed Shri Sai Vishram Co‑operative Housing Society and its promoters to pay interest under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). The Society appealed to the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, which …
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority directed Shri Sai Vishram Co‑operative Housing Society and its promoters to pay interest under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and to make a pre‑deposit under the proviso to Section 43(5). The Society …
The case arose from a fatal road accident on 25 August 2000 in which a Tata Sumo vehicle, being used on a hire basis, collided with a truck, killing Mr. Thummala Palli Ravi, an employee of Ispat Industries. The dependents of the deceased filed a claim for compensation before the Motor Accident …
M/s Amit Enterprises Housing Ltd appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal directing it to deposit the full amount ordered by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The appellant argued that any interest payable under Section 18 of the Real Estate …
The applicant, Vedant Kamlakar Gharat, filed an interim application seeking relaxation of bail conditions imposed by the Bombay High Court on 19 June 2024, which barred him from entering certain police jurisdictions and required him to attend police stations on specific dates each month. The State …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Competent Authority and Sub‑Divisional Officer, Bhiwandi. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted a praecipe on 6 April 2026 indicating the petitioner's desire to withdraw the petition. The court …
The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition seeking court directions to expedite the investigation of C.R.No.1474 of 2025 registered at Bandra police station. The respondent State argued that the accused is residing in the USA, making a swift investigation difficult, and that a Letter of Credit …
The petitioners, members of Matsyaghandha Co‑operative Housing Society, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Minister dated 12 September 2014 that de‑registered their society, alleging that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 21‑A of the Maharashtra …
Ashim Deb and another filed Criminal Revision Application No. 150 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court challenging the proceedings of the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought relief on the basis of alleged procedural or substantive deficiencies in the criminal case. The Court examined the …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Kalwa filed a first appeal (No. 465 of 2026) against Chetana Raghupati Reddi and others, with a cross objection filed by the same appellant against Salubai Barku Thorat and another party. Several interim applications were also filed by the …
The appellant, Suresh Baldevdas Talreja, filed a civil appeal against Shivkumar Baldevdas Talreja and another respondent. During the hearing, the parties informed the Court that the dispute had been amicably settled and presented a written Consent Term. The Consent Term, signed by the parties and …
The applicant, Heena Sameer Burondkar, filed an anticipatory bail application and later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Javed Sayed Nawaz Dordi, requested leave to withdraw the application. The court, after considering the request, …
The Bombay High Court heard a batch of first appeals filed by Indumati Nivrutti Kute and others against Anuradha Umashankar Jaiswal and others. The appellants failed to appear for the hearing on 4 March 2026, and the court noted that the order dated 4 February 2026 had not been complied with. The …
The petitioner, Amit Devendraprasad Ojha, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after April 25, 2017, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioners challenged a February 24, 2026 order of the Civil Judge, Pune, which appointed a Court Commissioner to measure and demarcate the disputed properties in an injunction suit. They argued that the suit sought only an injunction and did not request removal of encroachment or possession, …
The applicant, Prathmesh Prakash Kankekar, through Advocate Ms. Bhagyesha Kurane, admitted that due to inadvertence the compliance with the court's order dated 8 September 2025 remained pending. She sought a two‑week extension to fulfill the amendment required by that order. The State of …
The applicant, Rajendra Gangadhar Damale, has been incarcerated for about 14 years and was ordered to be released on bail on 16 January 2026, subject to furnishing a surety. He lacks a close relative to provide the surety, and consequently remains in custody. Through a legal aid‑appointed advocate, …
Aparna Ramesh Nandoskar, a 68‑year‑old housewife, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after hearing, was not inclined to grant the bail. Counsel for the applicant then sought leave to withdraw the application. The court …
The applicant, Ilesh Nemishchandra Shah, was convicted under Sections 420, 467, 471 and 468 read with Section 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of three years, two years and two years respectively, along with a fine. During the trial he was released on bail and, …
The applicant, Mohammed Ali Memon, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.91/2026 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant participated in an unlawful assembly and assaulted an informant, while the defence contended that he was …
The applicants, Shri Sai Vishram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and others, filed interim applications seeking condonation of a 20‑day delay in filing second appeals against orders of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal. The delay arose because the appellants had earlier filed writ …
The High Court considered an interim application filed by Mr. Kiran G. Kulkarni seeking the Court's intervention in Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation No.3 of 2023, alleging that the Thane Municipal Corporation was carrying out illegal demolition exercises. The Court examined whether the applicant, …
The petitioners were charged under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the suicide of a teacher, Shivaji Gade, following a departmental inquiry that allegedly humiliated him. They contended that the prosecution evidence did not establish any act of …
The applicant, Alka Netaji Wagh, filed a civil application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain Respondent No.1 from interfering with her possession of the suit land. The underlying suit for specific performance was initially decreed in her favour by the trial court, but the defendant …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a land acquisition award where the Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation at Rs. 25,250, while the jurisdictional reference court (11th Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Pune) had awarded Rs. 1,40,000. The appellant’s Additional Government Pleader (AGP) …
The petitioner, Mr. Munal Indrakumar Jhaveri, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. No counsel appeared on the scheduled hearing date, and the petition was adjourned for listing. On the subsequent date, again no counsel appeared for …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that struck out the name of Defendant No.12, a Special Land Acquisition Officer, in a suit for partition and separate possession. The petitioners argued that the plaint could not be partially rejected and that the deletion of the …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.