Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ESHA DILIPKUMAR SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was disposed of as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested.

Summary

The applicant, Esha Dilipkumar Shah, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1263 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court. On 06.05.2026, she was arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. Both counsel for the applicant and the State confirmed that the application was now infructuous. The Court, noting the admission of arrest, disposed of the anticipatory bail application as infructuous. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be entertained after the applicant has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • infructuous application
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                               17-ABA-1263-2026.doc



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                               ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1263 OF 2026
                       Esha Dilipkumar Shah                                … Applicant
                              Versus
                       The State Of Maharashtra                          … Respondent
                        __________________________________________________________
                       Ms. Shrishti Singh i/b Madan Gupta, for the Applicant.
                       Mrs. Anuja Gotad, APP for the Respondent – State.
                        __________________________________________________________
                                                   CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                                     DATE : 8th May, 2026.
                       P.C. :
                       1.      Ms. Shrishti Singh, learned Advocate for the Applicant

                       states that on 06.05.2026, the Applicant has been arrested and as

                       such, the present Application is rendered infructuous. She

                       therefore requests for disposal of this Application.


                       2.      Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP for the Respondent – State,

                       confirms the said statement made by Shrishti Singh, learned

                       Advocate for the Applicant. She submits that the present

                       Application is rendered infructuous and insists for its disposal.


                       3.      In view of the statement made by Ms. Shrishti Singh and

                       Mrs. Anuja Gotad, learned APP, Anticipatory Bail Application No.

                       1263 of 2026 is disposed of as infructuous.

                                                                   (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
          Digitally
          signed by
          ARJUN
ARJUN     KRISHNA
KRISHNA   RODGE        Arjun                           1
RODGE     Date:
          2026.05.08
          15:32:19
          +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.