Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NEETA PANKAJ MODANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court held that custody was not required and disposed of the anticipatory bail application, effectively granting bail.

Summary

The applicants, Neeta Pankaj Modani and others, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions from the investigating officer present in court, submitted that the applicants' custody was not required. The investigating officer’s report dated 21 May 2026 was recorded. Relying on this report, the court disposed of the anticipatory bail application, effectively granting bail by finding no need for custody. The decision was delivered by Justice Gautam A. Ankhd on 21 May 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicants should be taken into custody pending investigation
  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under the circumstances

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • custody
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • high court
  • bail application

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                        CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1367 OF 2026
                   Neeta Pankaj Modani and Ors.                             .. Applicants
                                Vs.
                   The State of Maharashtra,
                   Through Dindoshi Police Station, Mumbai                  .. Respondent


                   Mr. Akshay Shetty, Advocate, i/by AVC & Associates, for the Applicants.
                   Ms. S.G. Talhar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State
                   of Maharashtra.
                   I.O. Ms. Shubhangi Shirgave attached to Dindoshi Police Station is
                   present in Court.

                                                CORAM : GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
                                                DATE         : 21ST MAY 2026
                                                               [ VACATION COURT ]
                   P.C. :

                   1.       Ms.   Talhar,   learned Additional    Government   Pleader,     on

                   instructions from the Investigating Officer who is present in the Court,

                   submits that custody of the Applicants is not required. The learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor tenders a report of the Investigating Officer

                   dated 21st May 2026, which is taken on record and marked “X” for

                   identification.

                   2.       In terms of the aforesaid statement and the report, Anticipatory

                   Bail Application no.1367 of 2026 is disposed of.


                                                                 [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.]
      Digitally
      signed by
      SNEHA
SNEHA ABHAY                                            1/1
ABHAY DIXIT      13-ABA-1367-2026.doc                                                       Dixit
DIXIT Date:
      2026.05.21
      18:03:12
      +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.