Bombay High Court
RUPESH HARIBHAU KUMBARE AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that the matter is essentially civil and consequently granted anticipatory bail to the applicants under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Summary
The applicants, Rupesh Haribhau Kumbare and Kanchan Rupesh Kumbare, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a criminal case (C.R. No.155 of 2026) alleging offences under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 and several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicants, as builders, induced the informant to invest Rs.2.64 crore, misappropriated the amount, and threatened him when he demanded repayment. The parties later reached a settlement whereby the applicants agreed to pay Rs.3.25 crore, of which Rs.2.38 crore had already been received and the balance Rs.87 lakh was deposited with the Sessions Court. The court observed that the dispute was essentially civil in nature and therefore granted anticipatory bail with standard conditions, directing the applicants to appear before police and not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. The court also allowed the informant to seek withdrawal of the deposited amount from the Sessions Court.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the underlying dispute is primarily civil.
- Whether Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is applicable to quash a potential arrest in this case.
- Whether the settlement between the parties affects the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 3(5), 351(2)
- Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 — s. 3, 4
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- civil settlement
- Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- criminal procedure
- bail conditions
Judgment
913-ABA-1821-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1821 OF 2026
signed by
SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.09.03 Rupesh Haribhau Kumbare & Anr. …Applicants
10:32:56
+0530 Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Vinod Kendre i/b. Mr. Vipul DUshing, for the Applicants.
Mrs. Savita M. Yadav, APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Shailesh Kharat, for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Ravindra Alekar, API, attached to Kothrud Police Station, Pune
City, Pune, present.
Mr. Rupesh Haribhau Kumbare, Applicant No.1, present.
Mrs. Kanchan Rupesh Kumbare, Applicant No.2, present.
Mr. Manohar Aburao Dagade, Respondent No.2, present.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
PC:-
1. Heard Mr. Kendre, learned Counsel appearing for the
Applicants, Mrs. Yadav, learned APP appearing for Respondent
No.1-State and Mr. Kharat, learned Counsel appearing for
Respondent No.2.
2. Both the learned Counsel tendered affidavits dated 2 nd
September 2026.
Page 1
Sonali
913-ABA-1821-2026.DOC
3. This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail in
connection with C.R. No.155 of 2026 registered with Kothrud
Police Station, Pune, for the offences punishable under Sections 3
and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In
Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 and Sections 316(2), 316(5),
318(4), 3(5) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
4. The prosecution case is set out in paragraph 5 of the
Anticipatory Bail Application, which reads as under:
“5. That the prosecution story in nutshell is as
under:
A. On the basis of complaint lodged by one Manoj
Dagade it is alleged that, M/s R.K. Life Space
Developers Pvt. Ltd. which was ran by persons
namely Rupesh Haribhau Kumbare, Kanchan
Rupesh Kumbare, developed building namely
"R.K. Gracia" on property which was owned by
informant as per the agreed development
agreement.
B. It is further alleged that, Thereafter, by
inducing and gaining trust as builders, the
accused persons lured him by assuring that the
flats allotted to his share in the said building
could be sold at higher market rates. It is also
alleged that accused obtained a Power of
Attorney from informant for sale of the flats.
Subsequently, they sold Flat Nos. 301, 902, and
1102 in the said building to customers and, out
Page 2
Sonali
913-ABA-1821-2026.DOC
of the sale proceeds received, an amount of Rs.
2,64,00,000/- belonging to his personal share
was credited into their own bank accounts and
induced him to reinvest the said amount in their
company by assuring monthly returns at the rate
of 2% on the investment.
C. It is alleged that informant entrusted the said
amount of Rs.2.64 Crores to accused as
investment. However, the accused persons neither
returned the principal investment amount nor
paid any promised returns. Further, when
informant demanded his investment amount
personally as well as over phone calls, the
accused persons threatened the informant.
D. Accordingly, CR No. 155 of 2026 registered at
Kothrud Police Station against the accused for
offences punishable under Section 316(2),
316(5), 318(4), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, along with
S. 3,4 Of Maharashtra Protection of Interest of
Depositors Act.”
5. Both the learned Counsel state that the Applicants are
builders and Respondent No.2 is the owner of the plot, which is
being developed by the Applicants. In view of monetary dispute, an
FIR was lodged based on the contention of Respondent No.2-First
Informant that he had been cheated. Both the learned Counsel
state that however, during the pendency of this Anticipatory Bail
Application, the parties have arrived at settlement dated 27 th
August 2026. A photocopy of the same is annexed to the affidavit
dated 2nd September 2026 of the Applicants tendered in Court.
Respondent No.2-First Informant has also filed an affidavit dated
Page 3
Sonali
913-ABA-1821-2026.DOC
2nd September 2026. In the said affidavit, it is stated that the
Applicants will be paying total amount of Rs.3,25,00,000/- to the
Respondent No.2 and out of the same, Rs.2,38,00,000/- has
already been received by the Respondent No.2. The balance
amount of Rs.87,00,000/- has already been deposited before the
learned Sessions Court. In the affidavit of the Applicants dated 2 nd
September 2026, no objection has been given for transfer of the
said amount deposited before the learned Sessions Court at Pune,
Pune to the account of the First Informant-Respondent No.2.
6. The Respondent No.2 has also filed the affidavit stating that
the dispute is settled pursuant to which, Rs.3,25,00,000/- have
been agreed to be paid and Rs.2,38,00,000/- have been received
by the Respondent No.2 and the balance amount of Rs.87,00,000/-
has been deposited by the Applicants before the learned Sessions
Court, Pune.
7. Perused the FIR and the material on record. The same shows
that the dispute is predominantly of civil nature.
Page 4
Sonali
913-ABA-1821-2026.DOC
8. Accordingly, the case is made out for grant of Anticipatory
Bail. In view thereof, the following order is passed:
ORDER
(a) In the event of arrest of Applicant No.1-Rupesh
Haribhau Kumbare and Applicant No.2-Kanchan
Rupesh Kumbare in connection with C.R. No.155 of
2026 registered with the Kothrud Police Station, Pune
City, Pune, the Applicants are directed to be released
on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of
Rs.10,000/- each with one or two solvent sureties
each in the like amount.
(b) The Applicants shall attend the concerned Police
Station as and when called by the Investigating
Officer.
(c) The Applicants shall furnish their cell phone number
and residential address to the Investigating Officer
and shall keep the same updated, in case of any
change thereto.
(d) The Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make
any inducement, threat, or promise to any person
Page 5
Sonali
913-ABA-1821-2026.DOC
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or
to any Police personnel.
(e) The Applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence and shall not contact or influence the
Complainant or any witness in any manner.
9. The Respondent No.2 is at liberty to file an Application
before the learned Sessions Judge, Pune for the withdrawal of the
amount of Rs.87,00,000/-, which has been deposited before the
learned Sessions Court, Pune. If such Application is filed and as the
Applicants have given their no-objection for the transfer of the said
amount into the account of the First Informant/Respondent No.2,
the learned Sessions Judge, Pune, is requested to pass an
appropriate order expeditiously.
10. The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 6
Sonali
Checking your session…