Bombay High Court
KUNAL BHARAT KONDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail applications and disposed of them as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicants, Sachin Suresh Suryavanshi and Kunal Bharat Konde, filed anticipatory bail applications (Nos. 212 and 213 of 2026) after a B Summary Report was filed against them in a Sangli incident. They argued they were in Pune at the time of the alleged offence and that the complaint was filed because they assisted the complainant's husband. The Assistant Public Prosecutor accepted this statement and the applicants sought leave to withdraw their anticipatory bail applications. The Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of both applications as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant after filing
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- bail jurisdiction
- summary report
Judgment
30 & 31-ABA-212-2026 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 212 OF 2026
Sachin Suresh Suryavanshi … Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
WITH
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 213 OF 2026
Kunal Bharat Konde … Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
——————
Mr. R. M. Shinde for the Applicants.
Mrs. Priyanka S. Rane, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State in ABA/212/2026.
Mr. S.S. Chaudhari, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State in ABA/213/2026.
Officer :- PSI Ms. Reshma Khot, Sangli City Police Station, present.
——————
Coram : RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.
Date : 23rd April 2026.
PER COURT :
1. Learned A.P.P., on instructions, submits that the ‘B’ Summary Report has
been filed against the accused on 22 nd April 2026. He submits that the
osk 1 of 2
30 & 31-ABA-212-2026 (CR).docx
incident in the present F.I.R. is of Sangli, whereas the Applicants were in Pune
on the said date of incident. He submits that the Investigating Officer has
concluded that the complaint has been filed against the Applicants, as the
Applicants were assisting / helping the husband of the complainant. The said
statement is accepted.
2. In view of the said statement made by the learned A.P.P., learned
Advocate for the Applicants seeks leave to withdraw the present Anticipatory
Bail Applications.
3. Leave granted.
4. Both the Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of as withdrawn.
[ RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
OMKAR SHIVAHAR
SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.04.24
19:27:33 +0530
osk 2 of 2
Checking your session…