Bombay High Court
YOGESH KANUBHAI DARJIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED
Holding
The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, holding that custodial interrogation is not warranted and the applicant's personal liberty must be protected.
Summary
The applicant, Yogesh Kanubhai Darji, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after an FIR was lodged by his wife alleging dowry demand and cruelty dating back to 2010. The FIR was filed six years after the alleged incidents, while a divorce petition filed in 2020 remains pending, suggesting the allegations arise from a matrimonial dispute. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Court observed the substantial delay and the context of marital discord, concluding that custodial interrogation was not warranted and that the applicant's personal liberty should be protected. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail, imposing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and directing the applicant to cooperate with the investigation.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant given the delay in filing the FIR and the matrimonial dispute background.
- Whether the nature of the offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita warrants custodial interrogation.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 115(2), 316(2), 3(5), 352, 85
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — s. 3, 4
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- dowry prohibition
- marital dispute
- delay in FIR
- personal liberty
- Section 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- criminal procedure
Judgment
5-ABA-2630-2026.ODT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2630 OF 2026
Yogesh Kanubhai Darji …Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Adv. Vivek N. Arote a/w Adv. Akshay Dingale and Adv. Harish
Garde, for Applicant.
Mrs. Megha S. Bajoria, A.P. P., for Respondent – State.
PSI Shruti Malpote and APP Smt. Bhajoria, Dahisar Police Station,
Mumbai, are present.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C:-
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned
APP for respondent – State.
2. The applicant has filed the instant application under
Section 482 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No. 600 of
2026 dated 24.04.2026, registered with Dahisar Police Station,
Brihanmumbai, for the offence punishable under Sections 3 and
4 of The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Sections 3(5), 85,
115(2), 316(2) and 352 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Page 1 of 5
nd
22 September 2026
5-ABA-2630-2026.ODT
3. The FIR is registered on the basis of a report lodged by
the complainant/wife of the applicant alleging that from 29th
March 2010 till date the husband (this applicant) and the
father-in-law and mother-in-law have acted in collusion and
committed certain acts of cruelty upon her on account of
demanding dowry. She has also alleged that her Stridhana
articles are not returned by them. On the basis of these
allegations, the offence came to be registered against three
persons including this applicant and his parents.
4. Learned counsel for applicant submits that the FIR is
registered by the complainant in the background of the
matrimonial dispute between husband and wife and the
allegations about cruelty from March 2010 are without any
substantial basis. He submits that the complainant/wife has
already filed a divorce petition in the year 2020 and the same is
pending. As such, in the background of this matrimonial dispute
the allegations of cruelty do not show commission of any
offence. He submits that there is a delay of about six years in
lodging the report and the allegations are leveled for causing
harassment to the applicant and his aged parents. He submits
Page 2 of 5
nd
22 September 2026
5-ABA-2630-2026.ODT
considering the nature of the offence, the custody of this
applicant is not warranted.
5. Learned APP for the respondent – State opposed the
application and submitted that there are allegations in the FIR
about demand of dowry by the applicant and other accused
persons. It is also submitted that the Sessions Court has taken
note of the conduct of the applicant in not disclosing the
criminal antecedents and hence the application is disposed and
therefore, the instant application be also rejected.
6. Perused the FIR and the documents on record. It has
to be noted that the FIR is registered by the wife in the
background of matrimonial dispute in between the applicant
and the complainant. It has also to be noted that in the year
2020, the divorce petition is filed and the allegations of cruelty
if any, are with respect to the period when they were living
together. Thus, it is clear that there is substantial delay in
lodging the FIR and it prima facie appears that the offence is
registered to cause harassment to the applicant and his aged
parents.
7. At this stage, considering the nature of offence, custodial
interrogation of this applicant is not warranted and the presence
Page 3 of 5
nd
22 September 2026
5-ABA-2630-2026.ODT
of this applicant can be secured by directing him to attend the
Police Station. Having regard to all above aspects, the personal
liberty of the applicant needs to be protected.
8. Hence, I pass following order :-
ORDER
(i) The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed.
(ii) In the event of arrest of this applicant in
connection with Crime No. 600 of 2026,
registered with Dahisar Police Station,
Brihanmumbai, for the offence punishable
under Sections 3, 4 of The Dowry Prohibition
Act, 1961 and Sections 3(5), 85, 115(2),
316(2) and 352 of The Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023, he be released on bail on
furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Five Thousand only) with one solvent
surety of the like amount.
(iii) The applicant is directed to attend the Police
Station on 28th September 2026 in between
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and thereafter as and
when called upon by the investigating agency.
(iv) The applicant is directed to extend co-
operation during investigation and trial.
Page 4 of 5
nd
22 September 2026
5-ABA-2630-2026.ODT
(v) Breach of any of these conditions, shall be a
ground for cancellation of the bail.
9. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of in above
terms.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
VDMokal/-
Page 5 of 5
nd
22 September 2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.