Bombay High Court
AMOL RAMDAS KONDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- N JAMADAR
Holding
The Court allowed the anticipatory bail applications, directing that the applicants be released on bail if arrested, subject to prescribed conditions.
Summary
Amol Ramdas Konde and Krushnat Mahadev Aarde were charged in CR No.124/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 82 of the Registration Act, alleging forgery of a NA order. Their first anticipatory bail application (ABA No.589/2023) was rejected. After the investigation concluded, the charge‑sheet indicated that the applicants were not involved in the forgery but had merely used the purportedly forged order, and the investigating officer recorded no complicit conduct. The applicants cooperated with the investigation and no further arrest was deemed necessary. The Court, noting the completed investigation, the applicants' societal ties, and the lack of evidence of complicity, exercised its discretion to grant anticipatory bail, ordering release on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with conditions. The applications were therefore allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the investigation is complete and the applicants are not found complicit in the alleged forgery.
- Whether the arrest of the applicants is necessary to further the investigation.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 41-A
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471
- Registration Act, 1908 — s. 82
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- pre‑arrest bail
- forgery
- registration act
- IPC offences
- investigation
- charge sheet
- bail conditions
Judgment
1-ABA-3445-2025.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3445 OF 2025
Amol Ramdas Konde ..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3498 OF 2025
Krushnat Mahadev Aarde ..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Mr. Aadesh Konde-Deshmukh, for the
Applicant in both applications.
Smt. R. S. Tendulkar, APP in ABA No. 3445/2025
Mr. A. R. Metkari, APP in ABA No. 3498/2025.
Mr. Ganesh Dixit – P.S.I., Alankar Police Station is present.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 8th JANUARY 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
SANTOSH
Digitally signed
by SANTOSH
2. These are the second applications for pre-arrest bail.
SUBHASH
SUBHASH KULKARNI
KULKARNI Date: 2026.01.08
19:03:20 +0530
3. The applicants are arraigned in C.R. No. 124/2022
registered with Alankar Police Station, Pune for offences
punishable under Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w Section
34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘the Penal Code’) and Section
82 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 (‘the Registration Act,
1/4
SAINATH
1-ABA-3445-2025.DOC
1908’). The gravamen of the indictment against the applicants
and co-accused was that, the accused had forged NA permission
purportedly granted by the Sub Divisional OfEcer, Pune.
4. The Erst application for pre-arrest bail, which was jointly
Eled by the applicants, being Anticipatory Bail Application No.
589/2023, was rejected by this Court by an order dated 21 st
August, 2023.
5. The applicants have preferred these second applications
for bail, as in the intervening period, the Investigating Agency
has completed the investigation and lodged the charge-sheet,
with the assertions that, the investigation revealed that, the
forgery of NA Order was allegedly committed by the Accused
Nos. 1 to 5 and the applicants had no role in the alleged forgery
of the NA order. The Investigating Agency has arraigned the
applicants primarily for the offence punishable under Section
82 of the Registration Act, 1908.
6. On perusal of the charge-sheet, it becomes evident that,
the Investigating OfEcer has recorded a categorical opinion that,
the investigation did not reveal the complicity of the applicants
in the alleged forgery of the NA Order and the role of the
applicants is restricted to using the allegedly forged order while
2/4
SAINATH
1-ABA-3445-2025.DOC
registering the instrument, and, thus, they are sought to be
arraigned under Section 82 of the Registration Act, 1908.
7. The learned APP, on instructions of the Investigating
OfEcer, who is present in the Court, submits that, post the
rejection of Erst application for pre-arrest bail, during the
course of investigation, notices under Section 41-A of Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 were issued to the applicants and
they have co-operated with the investigation, and, thus, the
Investigating OfEcer did not consider it necessary to arrest the
applicants.
8. In view of the aforesaid developments, at this juncture, the
arrest of the applicants does not seem necessary to facilitate
further investigation. In fact, the investigation has, prima facie,
ruled out the complicity of the applicants in the forgery of
alleged order.
9. In these circumstances, since the investigation is complete
for all intent and purpose and the applicants appear to have
roots in the society, this Court is inclined to exercise the
discretion in favour of the applicants.
10. Hence, the following order:-
3/4
SAINATH
1-ABA-3445-2025.DOC
::ORDER::
a) The applications stand allowed.
b) In the event of the arrest of the applicants - Amol Ramdas
Konde and Krushnat Mahadev Aarde, in connection with the
C.R. No. 124/2022, registered with Alankar Police Station, Pune
for offences punishable under Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471
r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 82 of
the Indian Registration Act, 1908, the applicants be released on
bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each,
with one or two sureties in the like amount.
c) The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence and/or give threat or inducement to the Erst informant
or any of the prosecution witnesses or any of the persons
acquainted with the facts of the case.
e) The applicants shall regularly attend the proceedings
before the jurisdictional Court.
f) The applications stand disposed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
4/4
SAINATH
Checking your session…