Bombay High Court
RAJBAKSH LATIB SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the applicant to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, disposing of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Rajbaksh Latib Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application under sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) and 341(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, seeking release pending investigation of FIR No. 331/2026. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application, but no substantive arguments were advanced. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested a brief recess and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The State’s counsel and the intervener did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, noting the applicant’s request and the lack of opposition, granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under the specified provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 341(1)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
910 - ABA - 526 - 2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VAIBHAV
RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Date: 2026.09.23
CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 526 OF 2026
17:15:47 +0530
Rajbaksh Latib Shaikh … Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Tandale for the Applicant.
Ms. S. N. Deshmukh, APP for the State.
Ms. Ahilya Nalawade with Shraddha Patil for the
Intervener.
Mr. Akash Jadhav, PSI, Gandhinagar Police Station, District
Kolhapur.
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant,
Ms. S. N. Deshmukh, learned APP for the State, and Ms. Ahilya
Nalawade, learned Advocate for the Intervener.
2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for the
following substantive relief:
“A) This Anticipatory Bail Application may kindly be allowed;
B) The applicant may kindly be released on anticipatory bail in
connection with the F.I.R. bearing its Crime No.331/2026 registered with the
Police Station Gandhinagar u/s 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 341(1),
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and for that purpose issue necessary orders.”
VRJ 1
910 - ABA - 526 - 2026.docx
3. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Saurabh
Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, sought a pass-over to take
instructions from the Applicant.
4. After some time, at the request of Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, this Application was taken up. Mr. Saurabh
Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the
Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application. This
request is not opposed by Ms. S. N. Deshmukh, learned APP for the
State, and the Ms. Ahilya Nalawade, learned Advocate for the
Intervener.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw this
Application.
6. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 526 of 2026 is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
VRJ 2
Checking your session…