Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAOSAHEB NANA RUPNAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the applicant to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.

Summary

The applicant, Raosaheb Nana Rupnawar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case registered at Natepute Police Station, Solapur. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought a brief adjournment to consult the client and subsequently requested unconditional withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application. The State’s counsel did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the request, granted leave to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 can be withdrawn unconditionally by the applicant

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure
  • High Court
  • Bombay
  • Kolhapur

Judgment

                                                                1/2
                                                                                905-ABA-581-2026 (CR).DOC


                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.581 OF 2026


                        Raosaheb Nana Rupnawar                                     ….Applicant
                              VERSUS
                        The State Of Maharashtra and Anr.                          ....Respondents

                        _________________________________________________________________


                        Mr. Annasaheb N. Patil, for Applicant.
                        Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.
                        _________________________________________________________________



          Digitally
          signed by
          SHANTANU
                                               CORAM       :   ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
SHANTANU SHANKARSA
SHANKARSA DHUDUM
DHUDUM    Date:
          2026.09.30
          20:58:55
          +0530                                DATE        :   30th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                        P.C.


                        1.            Heard Mr. Annasaheb N. Patil, learned Advocate for the

                        Applicant and Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and

                        2 - State.


                        2.            By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the

                        following substantive relief:


                                    “A) In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with
                                        C.R. No.146/2026 registered with Natepute Police Station
                                        Tal.: Malshiras, Dist.: Solapur, The applicant may kindly
                                        release on bail u/s 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha



               Shantanu S. Dhudum
                                               2/2
                                                                905-ABA-581-2026 (CR).DOC


                      Sanhita, 2023 on such terms and conditions as this
                      Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.”


         3.          After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Annasaheb

         Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, sought a pass over to take

         instructions from the Applicant. After some time, at his request, this

         Application was taken up.


         4.          Mr. Annasaheb Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on

         instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to unconditionally withdraw

         the present Anticipatory Bail Application.


         5.          This request is not opposed by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P.

         for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.


         6.          In view of the statement made by Mr. Annasaheb Patil, learned

         Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present

         Anticipatory Bail Application.


         7.          Anticipatory Bail Application 581 of 2026 is disposed of as

         withdrawn.




                                                      ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




Shantanu S. Dhudum


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.