Bombay High Court
ANANDRAO SARJERAO THOMBAREversusPRAKASH DIGAMBAR LANJEKAR AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SANDESH D PATIL
Holding
The application is disposed of as infructuous because Respondent No.2 is no more.
Summary
An application for leave to appeal was filed by Anandrao Sarjerao Thombare against Prakash Digambar Lanjekar and another respondent. During the proceedings, the second respondent passed away. The applicant's counsel argued that the application should proceed, while the respondent's counsel noted the death. The court held that the death of a respondent rendered the application infructuous, as the necessary party was no longer available to be served or to participate. Consequently, the application was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether an application for leave to appeal becomes infructuous upon the death of a respondent?
Subjects
- Leave to appeal
- Infructuous application
- Death of party
- Criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
45-ALP-361-2017 (5th copy).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 361 OF 2017
Anandrao Sarjerao Thombare .....Applicant
Vs.
Prakash Digambar Lanjekar & Anr. .....Respondents
…..
Mr. Mohan M. Chavan with Mr. Sumit Dhanwade and Mr. Indrajeet
Babar i/b Mr. Rajaram V. Bansode, for the Applicant.
Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for Respondent-State.
…..
CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
DATED: 2nd JULY 2026.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Applicant states that the
Application has become infructous because Respondent No.2 is no
more. Hence, disposed of as infructous.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
Suresh
1
Checking your session…