Bombay High Court
ANANDRAO SARJERAO THOMBAREversusPRAKASH DIGAMBAR LANJEKAR AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SANDESH D PATIL
Holding
The application is dismissed as infructuous because Respondent No.2 is no longer alive.
Summary
The applicant, Anandrao Sarjerao Thombare, filed an application for leave to appeal in a criminal matter before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. The respondents were Prakash Digambar Lanjekar and another party. During the proceedings, it was brought to the court's notice that Respondent No.2 had passed away. Counsel for the applicant submitted that the application had become infructuous due to the death of the respondent. The court agreed and disposed of the application as infructuous, without further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether an application for leave to appeal can continue when one of the respondents is deceased
Subjects
- leave to appeal
- infructuous
- death of party
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
45-ALP-367-2017 (CR).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 367 OF 2017
Anandrao Sarjerao Thombare .....Applicant
Vs.
Prakash Digambar Lanjekar & Anr. .....Respondents
…...
Mr. Mohan M. Chavan with Mr. Sumit Dhanwade and Mr. Indrajeet
Babar i/b Mr. Rajaram V. Bansode, for the Applicant.
Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for Respondent-State.
…..
CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
DATED: 2nd JULY 2026.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Applicant states that the
Application has become infructous because Respondent No.2 is no
more. Hence, disposed of as infructous.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
Suresh
1
Checking your session…