Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVAJI DHONDIBA PATILversusAMOL NARAYAN SUTAR AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The application is transferred to the concerned District and Sessions Court and shall be treated as an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC, with the period spent before this Court excluded for limitation.

Summary

The applicant, Shivaji Dhondiba Patil, filed an application for leave to appeal against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1320. The High Court, after hearing counsel, ordered that the matter be transferred to the appropriate District and Sessions Court, to be treated as an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and directed that the time spent before the High Court be excluded for limitation purposes. The court directed the registrar to effect the transfer and the concerned court to issue notices and proceed accordingly. The application was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act can be transferred to a District and Sessions Court.
  • Whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran applies to such transfers.
  • Whether the appeal should be governed by the proviso to Section 372 CrPC.
  • Whether the period spent prosecuting the leave application should be excluded from the limitation period.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • leave to appeal
  • Section 138 NI Act
  • transfer of proceedings
  • Section 372 CrPC
  • limitation period
  • acquittal
  • appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                           922-ALP-74-2021 (CR).docx


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

           APPLN FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 74 OF 2021

Shivaji Dhondiba Patil                                  … Applicant
                      Versus
Amol Narayan Sutar And Anr.                             … Respondents



                                    ——————
Mr. Anand Patil i/b. Mr. Naveen Khaire for the Applicant.
Mr. Nitin B. Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State.
                                    ——————

                      Coram :      RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.

                      Date     :   30th April 2026.

PER COURT :

1.    Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned A.P.P. for

Respondent - State.

2.    Learned counsel for the Applicant points out that, the instant

application has been preferred seeking leave to file appeal against the order

of acquittal from offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act, 1881. He prays that, now, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme

Court in M/s. Celestium Financial             Vs. Ganasekaran ETC., reported in

[(2025) SCC    OnLine SC 1320], the Applicant would contest the appeal


osk                                  1 of 2
                                                                                 922-ALP-74-2021 (CR).docx


                     before the learned District and Sessions Court and hence urges that, the same

                     be transferred to the District Court.

                     3.       In view of the above, the following order is passed :

                                                           ORDER

                      (i)        The present proceeding be transferred to the concerned District
                                 and Sessions Court. Learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to
                                 take further necessary action for transferring this matter to the
                                 concerned District and Sessions Court, immediately.
                      (ii)       The concerned Court to whom this matter will be assigned, after
                                 registering it, shall issue notice to the concerned parties, and
                                 thereafter, proceed further with the matter in accordance with
                                 law.
                      (iii)      The concerned Court shall treat this matter as appeal under
                                 proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as per
                                 the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
                                 M/s. Celestium Financial (supra).
                      (iv)       Learned District and Sessions Judge to exclude the period spent
                                 in prosecuting instant leave application before this Court while
                                 calculating the period of limitation.
                      (v)        The Application therefore stands disposed of.



                                                       [ RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J. ]

           Digitally signed
           by OMKAR
OMKAR      SHIVAHAR
SHIVAHAR   KUMBHAKARN
KUMBHAKARN Date:
           2026.04.30
           19:20:00 +0530




                     osk                                  2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.