Bombay High Court
BHAUSAHEB VITTHAL MOHITEversusMANISHA W/O. DATTATRAYA JADHAV AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SANDESH D PATIL
Holding
The appeal was dismissed for default due to the appellant's failure to appear.
Summary
The appellant, Bhausaheb Vitthal Mohite, filed an appeal against an order dated 16 September 2025. The High Court directed that the appellant be served afresh because the matter was transferred to the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The appellant was duly served but failed to appear before the court. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal for default. No substantive merits of the case were considered, and the dismissal was purely procedural.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when an appellant fails to appear after being served anew?
Subjects
- default judgment
- civil appeal
- procedural default
- high court
Judgment
106-AO-364-2025 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 364 OF 2025
Bhausaheb Vitthal Mohite …...Appellant
Vs.
Manisha W/o. Dattatraya Jadhav & Ors. …...Respondents
...
None for the Appellant.
Mr. Prasad P. Kulkarni a/w Nakul v. Shukla & Amol S. Kanaki for
Respondent No. 2.
...
CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
DATED : 22nd JUNE 2026.
P. C. :
1. Vide order dated 16.09.2025 the Appellant was directed to be
served afresh as the matter was transferred to the Circuit Bench at
Kolhapur. The Appellant is served; however, none appears for the
Appellant.
2. Hence, Appeal from Order is dismissed for default.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
Harish 1
Checking your session…