Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HIMMATLAL RATANSHI PATELversusMR. SHIVSHANKAR TIHULI SAROJ

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is withdrawn and disposed of without any consideration of its merits.

Summary

The appellant, Himmatlal Ratanshi Patel, filed an appeal against a trial court order dated 23 February 2024. Counsel for the appellant sought the court's permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after hearing the application, disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. The court expressly noted that it had not examined the merits of the case, and therefore all rights and contentions of the parties remain open. The trial court is directed to decide the suit on its own merits without being influenced by the withdrawn appeal. No substantive findings on the underlying dispute were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal pending before the High Court can be withdrawn at the request of the appellant
  • What is the effect of withdrawal of an appeal on the parties' substantive rights and the pending trial court proceedings

Subjects

  • appeal withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • rights preserved
  • trial court jurisdiction
  • high court order

Judgment

            Digitally signed
            by SHAGUFTA
SHAGUFTA    QUTBUDDIN
QUTBUDDIN   PATHAN
PATHAN      Date:
            2026.06.24                                                       26-AO-447-2024.doc
            10:46:21 +0530

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.447 OF 2024

                   Himmatlal Ratanshi Patel                                  …Appellant
                             Versus
                   Shivshankar Tihuli Saroj                                  ...Respondent
                                                ——————
                   Ms. Henna P. Shah for the Appellant

                   Mr. Surya Das a/w Mr. Prateek Kharwar i/b Mr. R. R. Sharma for the
                   Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

                   Ms. Neeta Jadhav i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent-Corporation
                                               ——————

                                                 CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
                                                 DATE    : JUNE 22, 2026
                   P. C. :

                   1.        Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions, seeks

                   permission to withdraw the Appeal.

                   2.        The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

                   3.        It is clari/ed that this Court has not gone into the merits of the

                   matter and hence, all rights and contentions of all parties are expressly

                   kept open.         The Trial Court to decide the suit on its own merits,

                   unin3uenced by the /ndings in the impugned order dated 23 rd

                   February 2024.



                                                           [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]


       SQ Pathan                                                                             1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.