Bombay High Court
REGENCY WOOD PRODUCTS AND OTHERSversusMR. VINOD RANCHHODDAS POPAT AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHARMILA U DESHMUKH
Holding
The Court ordered the judgment to be corrected by replacing "Plaintiffs" with "Defendants" in paragraph 17 and to upload the corrected version.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay entertained a praecipe filed to amend a typographical error in its earlier judgment dated 27 July 2026. The error involved the use of the word "Plaintiffs" instead of "Defendants" in the second last line of paragraph 17. The Court examined the request and found no substantive issue, merely a clerical mistake. Accordingly, it ordered that the word be replaced and the corrected judgment be uploaded. The order was signed by Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh.
Issues considered
- Whether the judgment dated 27 July 2026 requires correction of the term "Plaintiffs" to "Defendants" in paragraph 17
Subjects
- judgment correction
- procedural order
- typographical error
Judgment
AO-668-2026 (nob-1).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 668 OF 2026
[No papers]
Regency Wood Products and Others ...Appellants
Versus
Mr. Vinod Ranchhoddas Popat and Another ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Udayan Jain, Mr. Ganesh Bajpai for Appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Bhimekar i/b J. Sagar Associates for Respondent.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 31st July, 2026
P. C. :
1. Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.
2. Praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the
judgment dated 27th July, 2026.
3. In 2nd last line of paragraph no. 17 of the judgment dated 27 th
July, 2026, replace the word “Plainti:s” with “Defendants”.
4. Judgment to be corrected and uploaded accordingly.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Sairaj 1 of 1
Checking your session…