Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BABULAL RAMKRUSHNA BADGUJARversusAJAY PRABHAKAR CHAUDHARY

Disposal
Transfer to other court

Holding

An appeal under Section 138 NI Act may be transferred to the District and Sessions Court as an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC, following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Celestium Financial.

Summary

The appellant Babulal Badgujar appealed against a trial court acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought transfer of the appeal to the District and Sessions Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran. The High Court, after noting the SC precedent, ordered the matter to be transferred to the concerned District and Sessions Court as an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Registrar was directed to effect the transfer and the Sessions Court to issue notices and proceed according to law. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of pending transfer.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be transferred to a District and Sessions Court under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in light of the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 138
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • appeal transfer
  • Section 372
  • Code of Criminal Procedure
  • Supreme Court precedent
  • High Court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38030


                                                       {1}          CrAppeal-264-2019


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               917 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 264 OF 2019

                                    Babulal Ramkrushna Badgujar
                                               VERSUS
                                     Ajay Prabhakar Chaudhary
                                                   ...
                 Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satyajit S. Bora
                 Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G.A. Nagori
                                                  ….

                                        CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                                        DATE :        21 AUGUST, 2026
                 PER COURT :-



                 1.    Learned counsel for the appellant points out that, the instant

                 appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of

                 acquittal from offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable

                 Instruments Act. He prays that, now, in view of the decision of the

                 Hon'ble Supreme Court in Celestium Financial v. Ganasekaran Etc.,

                 [(2025) SCC OnLine SC 1320], he would contest the appeal before

                 learned District and Sessions Court and hence urges that the same be

                 transferred to the District Court.


                 2.    In view of the above, the following order is passed :
                                   {2}            CrAppeal-264-2019




                                ORDER

I.     The present proceedings be transferred to the concerned
District and Sessions Court.

II.    Learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take further
necessary action for transferring this matter to the concerned District
and Sessions Court, immediately.

III.   The learned Sessions Court to whom this matter will be
assigned, after registering it, shall issue notice to the concerned
parties, and thereafter, proceed further with the matter in accordance
with law.

IV.    The concerned Sessions Court shall treat this matter as appeal
under proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as
per the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Celestium Financial (supra).


V.     Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.



                                         ( ABHAY S. WAGHWASE )
                                                 JUDGE
SPT


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.