Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NOORUDDIN KARIMBHAI KATHAWALAversusABDULLA KARIMBHAI KATHAWALA and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as abated because the appellant died before the three-year period and no case survives.

Summary

The appellant, Nooruddin Karimbhai Kathawala, filed a criminal appeal against Abdulla Karimbhai Kathawala and others. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died before the expiry of the three-year limitation period. The police station submitted a communication confirming the appellant's death. The court examined whether the appeal could continue in view of the appellant's demise and the lapse of the prescribed period. Finding that the appellant's death extinguished the right to prosecute and that no surviving case remained, the court held that the appeal could not proceed. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as abated.

Issues considered

  • Can a criminal appeal continue when the appellant has died before the prescribed limitation period?
  • Does the death of the appellant and the lapse of the three-year period result in abatement of the appeal?

Subjects

  • abated appeal
  • death of appellant
  • criminal procedure
  • limitation period
  • procedural law

Judgment

                        Mamta Kale                                                                   51-apeal-267-2004.docx


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       Criminal Appeal No. 267 of 2004
                    Nooruddin Karimbhai Kathawala                                                    … Appellant
                        versus
                    Abdulla Karimbhai Kathawala and Ors.                                             …Respondents
                                                ----

                    Mr Atit Shirodkar i/b Mr Ganesh Gole, for the Appellant.
                    Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the Respondent / State.
                    PSI Chavan, Agripada Police Station, Mumbai, is present.
                                                  ----
                                                         Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.
                                                                                         Date: 17 February 2026
                    P.C.:
        Digitally
        signed by
        MAMTA
                    .        The learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned
MAMTA AMAR
AMAR KALE
KALE  Date:
      2026.02.17
        18:51:41



                    APP jointly inform the Court that the appellant has passed
        +0530




                    away before three years and nothing survives in this criminal
                    appeal. The learned APP also tenders a communication to that
                    effect received from Police Inspector, Agripada Police Station,
                    Mumbai, which is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
                    identification.
                    2.       In view of the above, the present criminal appeal stands
                    dismissed as abated.


                                                                                                    (R.N. Laddha, J.)


                                                            Page 1 of 1
                                               __________________________________________________

                                                    17 February 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.