Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. MUKSH TRADERSversusSHIVAJI ANANDRAO PATIL AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn upon the appellant’s request.

Summary

The appellant, M/s Mukesh Traders, and the respondent, Shivaji Ananda Patil & Anr., appeared in person before the Bombay High Court’s Kolhapur Circuit Bench and submitted self‑attested Aadhaar cards for identification. Both parties stated that the dispute had been amicably settled and the appellant expressed a desire to withdraw the criminal appeal. The court considered the appellant’s request to withdraw the appeal. Accepting the appellant’s statement, the bench disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated beyond the procedural withdrawal.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal pending before the High Court can be withdrawn by the appellant after an amicable settlement.

Subjects

  • appeal withdrawal
  • amicable settlement
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural law

Judgment

1/2                                            130.Apeal.718.2009.odt



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
               BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 718 OF 2009

M/s Mukesh Traders, Kolhapur                    … APPELLANT

Versus

Shivaji Ananda Patil & Anr.                     … RESPONDENT


Mr. Vikas Chandar Nagdeo, Appellant in person present.
Mr. Shivaji Ananda Patil, Respondent in person present.
Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent/State.


                              CORAM   :     PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
                                          (Head of the Panel)
                                            KALPANA S. HORE,
                                          (Retired District Judge)
                                                 Member
                                            RAHUL R. PATIL,
                                           (Panel Advocate)
                                               Member
                              DATE    :     MARCH 14, 2026.

P.C:

.          In the present matter, the Appellant and Respondent
appeared in person. Both the parties have produced copies of self-
attested Adhar Card. The same are taken on record and marked as
‘X’ collectively for identiication.
2/2                                            130.Apeal.718.2009.odt



2.        Both the parties states that this matter is amicably
settled between them. Accordingly, the Appellant, who is present in
person states that he want to withdraw the present Appeal.


3.        In view thereof, by accepting the statement of the
Appellant, present Appeal stands disposed of, as withdrawn.




(RAHUL R. PATIL) (KALPANA S. HORE) (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.)
Panel Advocate   Retired District Judge Head of the Panel
  Member              Member




vijaya                                                  Digitally signed
                                                        by VIJAYA
                                         VIJAYA         GOURISHANKAR
                                         GOURISHANKAR   YADAO
                                         YADAO
                                                        Date: 2026.03.17
                                                        16:48:05 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.