Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAVIN JOSEPH PATHE AND ANR.versusM/S. KOTHARI ASSOCIATES AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for default due to the appellant's non‑appearance.

Summary

The appellant, Pravin Joseph Pathe & Anr., filed a criminal appeal challenging an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. A fresh notice was issued in March 2026, but when police attempted service, the appellants could not be found at the address. No party appeared before the court on the hearing date. The court noted the absence of the appellants and, relying on procedural rules, dismissed the appeal for default. The dismissal upheld the earlier acquittal due to the appellant's failure to appear and prosecute the appeal.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can proceed when the appellant fails to appear before the court
  • Whether dismissal for default is appropriate in the absence of service of notice and participation

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Section 138
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • default judgment
  • criminal appeal
  • acquittal
  • notice service

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by
          ANANT
ANANT     KRISHNA                                                                   45.APEAL.940.2008.doc
KRISHNA   NAIK
NAIK      Date:
          2026.04.30
          19:05:41
          +0530                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.940 OF 2008

                   Pravin Joseph Pathe & Anr.                             … Appellants.
                         Vs.
                   M/s Kothari Associates & Ors.                          … Respondent.
                                                          ***
                   None for the Appellant.
                   Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for the Respondent-State.

                                                        ***
                                                    CORAM           : M. M. SATHAYE, J.

                                                    DATED           : 30th APRIL 2026
                   P.C.:

                   1.      The Appeal is filed by the Complainant challenging the order of the
                   acquittal in the proceedings arising out of the section 138 of the Negotiable
                   Instruments Act, 1881. Recently in March, 2026 fresh notice was issued to
                   the Appellants.

                   2.      Learned APP has placed on record a copy of the report indicating that
                   when the concerned police officer went for effecting service of notice upon
                   the Appellants, they were not found at the address. Copy of the report is
                   taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

                   3.      Nobody is attending the matter today.

                   4.      In that view of the matter, appeal is dismissed for default.




                                                                          (M. M. SATHAYE, J.)



                   akn                                          1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.