Bombay High Court
KRUNAL BHARAT GHOGALE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The High Court held that, given the consent of the informant and the amicable settlement, the FIR and all consequential proceedings must be quashed.
Summary
The applicants, husband and mother‑in‑law, filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashal of FIR No. 58 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 85, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The dispute was matrimonial and had been settled by mutual consent divorce, with consent terms filed in the Family Court and an affidavit of no‑objection by the first informant, Respondent No. 2. The court examined whether the consent and settlement justified exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Finding that the informant consented and no public interest warranted continuation of the prosecution, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all related proceedings. The order disposes of the criminal application.
Issues considered
- Whether an FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute can be quashed on the basis of a mutual consent settlement and the informant's affidavit of no‑objection.
- Whether the High Court has jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS/Section 482 CrPC and Articles 226/227 to quash the FIR and consequent criminal proceedings.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 3(5), 351(2), 352, 85
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
- Constitution of India — s. Article 226, Article 227
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 13(B)
Subjects
- quash FIR
- consent affidavit
- mutual consent divorce
- Section 528 BNSS
- Section 482 CrPC
- extraordinary jurisdiction
- domestic dispute
- criminal application
Judgment
902-APL-1471-2026.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1471 OF 2026
Krunal Bharat Ghogale & Ors. …Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Sheetal Gaikwad a/w. Mr. Shashwat Nehete i/b. Mr. Omkar
Bhalal, for the Applicants.
Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Seema Pandya, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 18th SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C.:
1. At the outset, Ms. Gaikwad, learned Counsel appearing for
the Applicants seeks leave to amend the cause-title by making
certain corrections.
2. Accordingly, leave as aforesaid is granted. Amendment be
carried out forthwith. Re-verification is dispensed with.
3. By this Criminal Application filed under Section 528 of the
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”)/Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Applicants are seeking
Page 1
Sonali
902-APL-1471-2026.DOC
quashing of FIR bearing C.R. No.58 of 2025 registered with
Nayanagar Police Station, Mira Bhayandar under Sections 85, 352,
351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”).
The Application has been filed for quashing of the said C.R. by
consent. The relevant averments are to be found in paragraph
Nos.4 to 7 of the Application, which read as under:
“4. The Applicants submit that all disputes and
differences between Applicant No.1 and
Respondent No.2 have been amicably resolved
and settled out of Court. Pursuant thereto,
Consent Terms dated 13.07.2026 have been duly
executed between the parties and have been filed
before the Hon'ble Family Court at Bandra. A copy
of the said Consent Terms is annexed hereto and
marked as "EXHIBIT C."
5. The Respondent No.2 has agreed to remain
personally present before this Hon'ble Court,
along with her learned Advocate, at the time of
hearing of the present Criminal Application and
has further agreed to file an Affidavit recording
her consent and expressing her no objection to
the quashing of the aforesaid F.I.R. and all
consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
6. The Applicants state that, in view of the
aforesaid Consent Terms and the amicable
settlement arrived at between the parties,
Respondent No.2 does not wish to prosecute the
matter any further. Accordingly, Respondent No.2
has executed an Affidavit recording her
unconditional consent and no objection for
Page 2
Sonali
902-APL-1471-2026.DOC
quashing F.I.R. bearing C.R. No.58 of 2025
registered with Nayanagar Police Station and the
criminal proceedings arising therefrom, being
R.C.C. No.0002045 of 2025. A copy of the said
Consent Affidavit is annexed hereto and marked
as "EXHIBIT D."
7. The Applicants submit that in view of the
amicable settlement, the execution of the Consent
Terms and the Consent Affidavit of Respondent
No.2 expressing her unequivocal desire not to
proceed further with the criminal case, no useful
purpose would be served by continuing the
prosecution. It is therefore just, fit and proper that
this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set
aside F.I.R. bearing C.R. No.58 of 2025 registered
with Nayanagar Police Station and all
consequential proceedings arising therefrom,
including R.C.C. No.0002045 of 2025 pending
before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Mira Bhayandar, in exercise of its extraordinary
jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.”
4. A separate Consent Affidavit of the Respondent No.2 dated
25th August 2026 has also been filed in this Criminal Application.
The Respondent No.2-Sharvari Krunal Ghogale is personally
present in Court. She states that the dispute is of matrimonial
nature and she has settled the dispute with the Applicants.
5. The Applicant No.1, husband and the Applicant No.2, the
mother-in-law of Respondent No.2 as well as the Respondent No.2
Page 3
Sonali
902-APL-1471-2026.DOC
are personally present in the Court and they state that they have
settled the dispute in terms of the Consent Terms, which are filed
in the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, in Petition No.A-1093 of
2025, which are annexed at Exhibit ‘C’ (Pages 19 to 22) of the
Application. The Consent Terms records that the Applicant No.1
and the Respondent No.2 have decided to get divorce by mutual
consent by converting the said Petition in Mutual Consent Divorce
Petition under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on
the various terms and conditions set out in the said Consent Terms
including clause No.4, which reads as under:
“4. It is agreed between the parties that after
filing the Consent terms the Petitioner shall file a
Petition before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court
for quashing of the F.I.R bearing No.58 of 2025
registered by Respondent u/s 498A, now bearing
Court Case No.R.C.C/0002045/2025 pending
before Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mira
Bhayandar. The Respondent agrees to file her
Affidavit of No-Objection for quashing of the said
F.I.R., and the corresponding Court case. The
Respondent agrees to personally remain present
accompanied by her Advocate at the time of
hearing of the said quashing proceedings.”
6. The present Application is filed in terms of the said Consent
Terms. As noted earlier, the Respondent No.2, who is personally
present in Court states that the dispute is settled and gives her
Page 4
Sonali
902-APL-1471-2026.DOC
consent for quashing the FIR and even the Consent Affidavit of the
Respondent No.2 has also been filed in this Court.
7. As the dispute is of matrimonial nature and as the
Respondent No.2 i.e. the First Informant has given consent for
quashing of the FIR, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer
clause (a), which reads as under:
“a) To quash and set aside F.I.R. bearing C.R.
No.58 of 2025 registered with Nayanagar Police
Station for the offences punishable under Sections
3(5), 85, 351 and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023, together with all consequential
proceedings arising therefrom, including R.C.C.
No.0002045 of 2025 pending before the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mira Bhayandar.”
8. Thus, the FIR bearing C.R. No.58 of 2025 together with all
consequential proceedings including the chargesheet filed
concerning the said FIR, are also quashed.
9. Accordingly, the Criminal Application is disposed of in above
terms.
Digitally [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
signed by
SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.09.19
11:25:59
+0530
Page 5
Sonali
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.