Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUMIT PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The applications are dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The applicant, Sumit Pal Singh, filed several criminal applications (Nos. 351, 368, 369, 370 of 2023) before the High Court of Bombay. The Court earlier listed the applications for dismissal on 13 February 2026. On 17 February 2026, no appearance was made on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, the Court dismissed the applications for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal applications should be dismissed for want of prosecution?

Subjects

  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • criminal application
  • High Court of Bombay
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                                 903-APL-351-2023.doc


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 351 OF 2023

Sumit Pal Singh                                      …Applicant

        V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.                    ...Respondents

                                 WITH
                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 370 OF 2023
                                 WITH
                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 369 OF 2023
                                 WITH
                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 368 OF 2023


None for the Applicants.
Mr. V. N. Sagare, APP for the Respondent/State.
Adv. Tushar Gujjar a/w Adv. Deep Madnani i/b SL Partners,
Advocate for Respondent No.2.


                                    CORAM        :   N.R. BORKAR, J.
                                    DATE         :   17.02.2026.

P.C. :


1.                On 13.02.2026 this Court had passed the following

order :

                  .    None   for    the    Applicants.   List      the
                  applications under the caption “for dismissal”
                  on 17th February 2025 on supplementary board.


Pramod S.Lakare
                                           1/2
                                                              903-APL-351-2023.doc


2.                Today again none appears for the applicants. The

applications are thus dismissed for want of prosecution.



3.                Ad-interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                   [N.R.BORKAR, J.]




Pramod S.Lakare
                                          2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.