Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAKET ANIL BAGARIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The Court held that the respondents had complied with the order and no further orders were required.

Summary

The Bombay High Court heard two criminal applications, APL/807/2025 filed by Abdul Hafeez Shaikh and APL/446/2024 filed by Saket Anil Bagaria, both against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought enforcement of an earlier order dated 28 January 2026 that directed the respondents to pay specified amounts. Counsel for the respondents submitted that the required amounts had been deposited by their respective clients. An office noting dated 13 February 2026 confirmed that the deposits were indeed made. Consequently, the Court found that the order had been complied with and issued no further orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents have complied with the order dated 28 January 2026 directing payment of amounts?

Subjects

  • compliance
  • court order
  • criminal application
  • High Court
  • Maharashtra

Judgment

          Digitally signed
          by LAXMIKANT
LAXMIKANT GOPAL                                                            (25) APL-807.25.DOCX
GOPAL     CHANDAN
CHANDAN   Date:
          2026.02.16
          18:16:46 +0530
                                                                                            lgc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.807 OF 2025

                             Abdul Hafeez Shaikh                             : Applicant.
                                  Versus
                             The State of Maharashtra and anr.               : Respondents.

                                                        AND
                                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.446 OF 2024 (Not on Board)

                             Saket Anil Bagaria                       : Applicant
                                   Versus
                             The State of Maharashtra and anr.        : Respondents.
                             ______________________________________________________

                             Ms. Prajkta Shinde, for the Applicant in APL/807/2025.
                             Mr. Avinash Kari a/w Ms. Anjali Nimbalkar, for the Applicant
                                  in APL/446/2024.
                             Mr. Sukanta Karmarkar, APP for the Respondent/State in
                                  APL/807/2025.
                             Mr. Prasanna Malshe, APP for the Respondent/State in
                                  APL/446/2024 .
                             Ms. Asmeeta Bhoir, for Respondent No.2 in both the
                                  Applications.
                             ______________________________________________________

                                                    CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                                     DATED : 16 FEBRUARY 2026
                             PC:-



                             1.      Ms. Prajakta Shinde, learned Advocate for the Applicant
                             in APL/807/2025, Mr. Avinash Kari, learned Advocate for the
                             Applicant in APL/446/2024 and Ms. Asmeeta Bhoir, learned


                                                             1
                                                (25) APL-807.25.DOCX


Advocate for the Respondent No.2, submit that the order
dated 28 January 2026 is complied with and the amounts
directed to be paid by the said order, have been deposited by
their respective clients.

2.    Office Noting dated 13 February 2026 confirms the said
position.

3.    In view of the same, no further orders.




                                      (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




                               2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.