Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAHLADCHAND G. OBEROI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The Applicants filed a criminal application seeking the court to call for investigation papers and to quash the charge sheet filed under Sections 395, 458 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code in FIR No. 198 of 2019. They alleged that the investigation papers were improperly seized and that the charge sheet should be set aside. The State did not oppose the Applicants' request to withdraw the application. The Applicants, through counsel, unconditionally withdrew the application, and the State consented to the withdrawal. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should order the production of investigation papers and quash the charge sheet filed under Sections 395, 458 and 342 IPC.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • quash of charge sheet
  • withdrawal of application
  • investigation papers
  • IPC sections 395, 458, 342

Judgment

                                                                                                 31-APL-63-2020.doc



                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           Digitally signed
           by GAYATRI
GAYATRI    RAJENDRA
RAJENDRA
SHIMPI
           SHIMPI
           Date:
           2026.01.30
           21:18:28 +0530
                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                               CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2020



                              Prahladchand GOberoi & Ors.                               … Applicants
                                       V/s.
                              The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                           … Respondents
                                                                      -------

                              Mr. Aaryan Survase, i/b Mr. Prashant Aher, Advocate for
                              Applicants.
                              Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                                            ---
                                                          CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                                                     DATE :      28th JANUARY, 2026.


                              P.C. :



                              1.                By the present Application, the Applicants have sought

                              for the following substantive reliefs in prayer clauses (a) and (b) :-


                                                 “(a) that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call
                                                 for the investigation papers concerning FIR No.198 of
                                                 2019, of Antop Hill Police Station, dated 15.06.2019,
                                                 Under Sections 395, 458, 342 of IPC, (Exhibit "B"
                                                 hereinabove) from the Antop Hill Police Station,
                                                 currently seized of the investigation and after
                                                 examining the legality, validity and/or propriety of
                                                 the same, may be pleased to quash and set aside
                                                 against the present Applicants;



                              Gayatri shimpi                         1
                                                                31-APL-63-2020.doc



                 (b) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to
                 quash and set aside the Charge sheet, arising out of
                 FIR No. 198 of 2019, of Antop Hill Police Station,
                 dated 15.06.2019, Under Sections 395, 458, 342 of
                 IPC;”



2.               Mr.   Aaryan   Survase,     learned    Advocate        for   the

Applicants, on instructions from the Applicants, craves leave to

unconditionally withdraw this Application.



3.               Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, learned APP for the State does

not object to the said request made by Mr. Aaryan Survase.



4.               In view of the above, leave granted to withdraw this

Application.



5.               Criminal Application No. 63 of 2020 is dismissed as

withdrawn.


                                              (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




Gayatri shimpi                       2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.